ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 07 May 2019

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00441

Proteomic Analysis Provides Insights Into the Therapeutic Effect of GU-BEN-FANG-XIAO Decoction on a Persistent Asthmatic Mouse Model

  • 1. Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

  • 2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pediatric Respiratory Disease, Institute of Pediatrics, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

  • 3. Children’s Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

  • 4. College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China

  • 5. Department of Chemistry and Institute of Biomedical Sciences of Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Gubenfangxiao decoction (GBFXD) is a traditional Chinese medicine based on a combination of Yu-Ping-Feng-San and Erchen decoctions. GBFXD has been widely used for decades in treating asthma at the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Previously, GBFXD was found to reduce lung inflammation and airway remodeling; however, the underlying mechanism remains unknown. In this study, the effects of GBFXD on asthmatic mice were evaluated based on pathology and lung function; airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and pathology were compared among the two different mouse models utilized. Furthermore, the mechanism of action of GBFXD on asthmatic mice was analyzed using iTRAQ labeling technology combined with ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA). Modeling analysis of pre- and post-treatment proteins identified 75 differentially expressed proteins. These proteins were related to B-cell development, calcium-induced lymphocyte apoptosis, antigen presentation, and Th1 and Th2 activation pathways. Moreover, 68 differentially expressed proteins were identified in the GBFXD treatment group compared with the model group. Upstream regulatory factors predicted that interleukin (IL)-4 (necessary for inducing polarization of type 2 [M2] macrophages), cyclooxygenase, and prostaglandin E2 are significantly elevated in the model group. Based on IPA analysis, it was concluded that several pathways, including mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative phosphorylation, are closely associated with the therapeutic effects of GBFXD in asthma. Moreover, the differential expression of several proteins, including the M2 markers, MRC1, ARG1, Retnla, Chil3, and CHIA, were validated by western blotting, confirming that GBFXD can reduce airway inflammation, which fits the pattern of an alternative M2 activation state, and attenuate AHR. Overall, our findings indicate that GBFXD significantly suppresses M2 macrophage polarization, providing further insights into the mechanism underlying the protective effects of GBFXD.

Introduction

Asthma is one of the most common chronic, non-infectious airway diseases in children, with a global prevalence of 1–18% (Ebmeier et al., 2017; Papi et al., 2018). As a developing country, with the change of industrialization and lifestyle, the incidence of asthma in Chinese children is rising (Guo et al., 2018). Asthma is characterized by chronic airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness and airway remodeling (Grainge et al., 2011). However, asthma in childhood and adult asthma is significantly different in epidemiology. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the main causes of recurrent asthma in children (Jartti and Gern, 2017; William et al., 2018). Moreover, epidemiological studies have shown that early infection with RSV can increase the risk of asthma in children (Carroll et al., 2017). Experiments have confirmed that the increased eosinophils can be found in airway of infants and mice after infection with RSV, which is associated with the involvement of viral prion-induced Th2 type cytokines as well as eosinophil chemotactic factors during RSV replication (Phipps et al., 2007). In addition, RSV infection can also cause damage to the airway surface (Zhang et al., 2002). At present, research on the role of RSV infection in asthma via proteomics has ever been yet reported.

The prevalence of asthma in children in China is 3.01% (Liu, 2019). However, the long-term use rate of ICS is only 57.8% (Liu and Chen, 2013). As a traditional medication, herbal compound has become a common alternative treatment for asthma in children in China and other Asian countries (Huang et al., 2013; Geng et al., 2016). At the molecular level, traditional Chinese medicine formulations are multi-targeted and multi-component. Combinatorial systems biology and omics technology currently provide powerful tools for addressing the complexities and mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine formulations (Yue et al., 2017; Chun et al., 2018).

Gubenfangxiao decoction (GBFXD) has been used clinically for decades. It is consisted of traditional Chinese medicine compound Yupingfeng powder (YPF-P) and Ershen Tang (ECD). Previous clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety for long-term prevention of asthma recurrence (Yuan et al., 2010). Subsequent studies have shown that GBFXD can reduce lung inflammation in OVA-sensitized mice, inhibit the expression of asthma susceptibility genes ORMDL3 and ADAM33, and reduce endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) (Huang et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2016). In this study, as a model of chronic persistant asthma, RSV-OVA-sensitized mice was established. iTRAQ-based proteomics studies and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) were performed to reveal the protein features of RSV-OVA-sensitized mice and investigate the underlying mechanisms of GBFXD.

FIGURE 1

Materials and Methods

Animal Experiments and Drug Treatments

GBFXD Preparation

GBFXD, which consists of 11 components (Table 1), was purchased from the Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu, China) and authenticated by Dr. Sheng-Jin Liu of the College of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China. The principal components of GBFXD were prepared and identified by high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet in a previous study (Lu et al., 2016).

Table 1

ComponentPartWeight (g)
Radix astragali preparata cum melle (Zhi Huang Qi)Root15
Codonopsis radix (Dang Shen)Root10
Atractylodis macrocephalae rhizoma (Bai Zhu)Rhizome10
Poria (Fu Ling)Sclerotia10
Calcined concha Ostreae (Duan Mu Li)Shell15
Periostracum cicadae (Chan Tui)Slough6
Citri pericarpium reticulatae (Chen Pi)Peel6
Saposhnikoviae radix (Fang Feng)Root3
Flos Magnoliae (Xin Yi)Bud6
Schisandrae Chinensis fructus (Wu Wei Zi)Fruit6
Glycyrrhizae radix et rhizoma (Zhi Gan Cao)Rhizome and root3

GBFXD composition.

Animal Model Establishment

Four-week-old, female, specific-pathogen-free BALB/c mice (16–18 g) were purchased from Suzhou JOINN Laboratories Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China). The animals were housed in the experimental animal center of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine and maintained under a 12 h light/dark cycle at a constant temperature of 22 ± 2°C. Cages, bedding, food, and water were sterilized before use. Mice were sensitized with 20 μg intraperitoneal OVA injections (grade II; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States), after which the clinical remission asthmatic (CRA) and chronic persistent asthmatic (CPA) models were established at two different challenge frequencies. The excitation models included 2.5% OVA atomization and RSV in nasal drop form with a titer of 1.0 × 10 TCID50/mL (Figure 1A). The mice were randomly divided into six groups as follows, CON-CRA control group, MOD-CRA model group, GBF-CRA (36 g/kg/d) treatment group, CON-CPA control group, MOD-CPA model group, and GBF-CPA (36 g/kg/d) treatment group. Prior to the experiments, there were no significant differences among the groups in terms of animal weight. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Laboratory Animals and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine [no. SYXK (Su) 2014–0001].

Proteomics

Protein Extraction and Digestion

Lungs were excised, immediately frozen at −80°C, and ground in liquid N2. Cold RIPA extraction buffer (Beyotime, Haimen, China) was added to the pulverized tissue and then the mixture was sonicated. Next, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (Beyotime), 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitor cocktails (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) were added, after which the mixture was centrifuged at 4°C and 30,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and added to five volumes of cold acetone containing 10% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid, thoroughly mixed, and incubated at −20°C overnight. The mixture was centrifuged again at 4°C and 30,000 × g and the supernatant was discarded. The precipitate was then washed three times with chilled acetone, dissolved in RIPA buffer, and air-dried. Proteins were quantified with a BCA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States), after which 300 μg of total protein was mixed with sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, United States) at an enzyme-to-protein ratio of 1:50 and incubated at 37°C for 16 h. Peptides obtained from the digestion were dried by vacuum centrifugation.

iTRAQ Labeling and High-pH Reverse-Phase (RP) Fractionation

Peptides were processed using 4-plex iTRAQ reagent (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, United States) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Control samples were labeled with 116 iTRAQ tags, model samples were labeled with 115 iTRAQ tags, GBFXD samples were labeled with 114 iTRAQ tags, and the mixtures were labeled with 117 iTRAQ tags. High pH RP fractionation was then performed with the U3000 HPLC chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The iTRAQ-labeled peptide mixtures were reconstituted with 100 μL of high pH RP buffer A (98% H2O, 2% acetonitrile; pH 10.0) and loaded onto a C18 column with a particle size of 1.7 μm (2.1 mm × 100 mm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, United States). The column was eluted with the following gradient program, 3–18% buffer B (2% H2O, 98% acetonitrile; pH 10.0) for 30 min; 18–32% B for 15 min; 32–98% B for 6 min; and holding at 98% B for 15 min. The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min and elution was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 214 nm.

Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Analysis

Peptides were re-dissolved in buffer A (2% acetonitrile, 0.1% formate) and centrifuged at 4°C and 20,000 × g for 10 min. The final peptide concentration of each fraction was ∼0.2 μg/μL. The peptides (10 μL) were then loaded onto a 2-cm C18 trap column using the Nano LC System autosampler (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and eluted onto a 15-cm analytical C18 column with an inner diameter of 75 μm using a 3–55% buffer B (84% acetonitrile, 0.1% formate) gradient. The elution process ran for 112 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The peptides were ionized via nano-electrospray ionization at a voltage of 2.2 kV. Data-dependent MS/MS was performed using an LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Using the MS1 full scan at a resolution of 60,000, the five most abundant precursor ions surpassing the 5,000 count threshold were selected for MS/MS analysis at a dynamic exclusion duration of 60 s. Normalized collision energy for high-energy collision dissociation (HCD) was set to 40.0. Finally, the ion fragments were detected in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 7,500 m/z scan ranges were 350–1800 and 100–1800 Da for the MS1 and the MS2 scans, respectively.

Protein Identification and Quantification

Raw MS data were converted into.MGF files using Proteome Discoverer v.1.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were identified with the SEQUEST search engine and considered differentially expressed when their fold changes were > 1.5 or <0.66 and p < 0.05. Parameters required for qualification are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

Parameter
Enzyme: trypsin
Miss cleavage: 2
MS/MS tolerance ppm: 10
Fixed modification: carbamidomethylation (C)
Variable modification: oxidation (M) and deamidation (NQ)
Unique peptide: 2
Peptide FDR: 0.01

Parameters required for qualification.

Bioinformatic Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs)

Protein-encoding genes were functionally categorized according to biological process, molecular function, and cellular components by the PANTHER gene classification system. Proteomic data were analyzed by Ingenuity® Pathways Analysis (IPA; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to elucidate the hidden biological significance of the experimental data. Biological information obtained from data analysis is presented as biological function/disease, canonical pathways, networks, and upstream regulators.

Histopathology

Lung tissues were infused with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and processed for histology. Paraffin-embedded samples were sectioned (5-mm thick) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to examine the extent of peribronchial inflammation. Glandular hyperplasia was analyzed in randomly selected samples using the periodic acid Schiff (PAS) staining method.

Airway Hyperresponsiveness (AHR) Testing

BABL/c mice in their natural state were placed in Whole Body Plethysmography(WBP) and allowed to stabilize for 3 min to adapt to the environment. Basic physiological respiratory parameters were measured for 3 min, after which normal saline was added to the inhalation tubes in the boxes. Diluted methacholine (300 μL) was then injected into the boxes at a concentration of 0, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 g/L. The mist generation rate was adjusted to 50%. For every minute of nebulization and inhalation, Enhanced pause (Penh) values were calculated using the software of the associated computer interface; the average Penh value at each challenge dose was calculated 3 min after inhalation.

Validation

Total RNA from the lung samples was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Japan) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription master mix (G490) and EvaGreen qPCR master mix (MasterMix-ER) were purchased from Applied Biological Materials Inc. (Richmond, BC, Canada). ARG1, MRC1, Retnla, CHIL3, TNF, and IFNG mRNA levels were determined by quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR using GAPDH as a reference gene (Table 3). Expression levels of ARG1, CHIA, and Retnla (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) in lung tissue were also measured by western blotting using β-actin as loading control. Protein samples from the lungs were fractionated via SDS-PAGE. Three independent experiments were performed.

Table 3

GeneForward primerReverse primerExpected product size (bp)
Arg1CCGAGGATGGAGAGCAGCTAGGCCTGAGAGTCTGTGCCAATGAGC150
RetnlaACTTCTTGCCAATCCAGCTAACTATCCGCAGTGGTCCAGTCAACGAGTAAG204
CHIL3CAGTGTTCTGGTGAAGGAAATGACCCAGACTTGATTACGTCAAT119
Mrc1GTCTGAGTGTACGCAGTGGTTGGTCTGATGATGGACTTCCTGGTAGCC85
IFNGGCGTCATTGAATCACACCTGTGAGCTCATTGAATGCTTGG129
TNFGCGACGTGGAACTGGCAGAAGCATCGGCTGGCACCACTAGTTG327
GAPDHCGTGTTCCTACCCCCAATGTTGTCATACTTGGCAGGTTT104

Primer sequences.

Data Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, United States). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test to determine the statistical significance. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Results

GBFXD Alleviates Airway Inflammation and AHR Caused by Persistent Challenge

We improved the previous method (Lu et al., 2016) and established a CPA model that more closely simulates chronic persistent asthmatic characteristics than the one previously tested. H&E staining, PAS staining, and AHR of the two models tested were compared. In both models, the mice developed typical inflammatory changes including bronchial congestion and inflammatory cell infiltration. Mucus expression in the airways was evaluated by quantifying and comparing PAS-positive cells between the two models; the CPA model presented with more prominent goblet cell hyperplasia and mucus overproduction. After GBFXD treatment, however, the average number of PAS-stained goblet cells was greatly reduced (Figure 1B,C). Asthma is an airway obstruction often accompanied by varying degrees of AHR. As the Penh metric can reflect airway responsiveness and Penh values are accepted AHR indicators, we calculated Penh values after induction with a methacholine concentration gradient. We found higher AHR in the CPA model than in the CRA model, with GBFXD showing significantly reduced AHR (Figure 1D).

Proteomic Expression Patterns

To compare the pathological and pulmonary function results, we selected the CPA model for further proteomic experiments. A total of 1,956 proteins were identified by iTRAQ with a < 1% false discovery rate (FDR) after analyzing three biological replicates of mouse lung tissue. Proteins with significantly altered expression levels at a fold change cut-off of > 1.5 relative to the model group were considered DEPs (p < 0.05). We found 71 DEPs in the model group compared with control; 17 proteins were downregulated while 54 proteins were upregulated (Figure 2A and Table 4). Moreover, a total of 68 proteins were differentially expressed after GBFXD treatment compared with that of the model group; 47 proteins were upregulated and 20 were downregulated (Figure 2B and Table 5). EIF4B, HBA1/HBA2, Hist1h1e, HLA-A, and LYVE1 were repressed in the model group but were found upregulated after GBFXD treatment. In contrast, ANXA8/ANXA8L1, APOA, ARG1, CHIA, CYP1A1, FTL, H2AFZ, PLPP3, Retnla, S100A4, and TSN were induced in the model group but downregulated in response to GBFXD treatment (Figure 2C). Furthermore, DEPs were classified using the PANTHER gene classification systems and the enriched gene ontology (GO) terms were found enriched compared with the control group, hydrolase activity (GO:0016787), protein binding (GO:0005515), metabolic process (GO:0008152), and response to stimuli (GO:0050896). DEPs between the GBFXD and model groups were mainly involved in metabolic processes (GO:0008152), cellular processes (GO:0009987), cellular component organization or biogenesis (GO:0071840), intracellular processes (GO:0005622), and protein binding (GO:0005515; Figure 2D–I).

FIGURE 2

Table 4

Expression fold changeIDSymbolEntrez gene name
−4.011O88990Actn3Actinin alpha 3
−4.834P03958ADAAdenosine deaminase
−1.877O35640ANXA8/ANXA8L1Annexin A8 like 1
−1.563Q810I7APOA4Apolipoprotein A4
−3.331Q61176ARG1Arginase 1
−1.622Q69Z96ATP13A1ATPase 13A1
−2.623Q8R429ATP2A1ATPase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting 1
1.675B1ASE2ATP5HATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex subunit D
−6.174Q61114BPIFB1BPI fold containing family B member 1
−1.556Q3TNN6CAPGCapping actin protein, gelsolin like
−2.274Q61362CHI3L1Chitinase 3 like 1
−2.707Q91XA9CHIAChitinase, acidic
−6.08O35744Chil3/Chil4Chitinase-like 3
−1.812P07310CKMCreatine kinase, M-type
−4.014Q9D7Z6CLCA1Chloride channel accessory 1
1.825P02463COL4A1Collagen type IV alpha 1 chain
−1.871D3Z315COPECoatomer protein complex subunit epsilon
−1.82P00184CYP1A1Cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1
1.636Q922K6EIF4BEukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B
−2.16Q3THE6FTLFerritin light chain
−1.552Q3UA95H2AFZH2A histone family member Z
1.609P01942HBA1/HBA2Hemoglobin subunit alpha 2
1.753A8DUV1HBA1/HBA2Hemoglobin subunit alpha 2
2.24P43274Hist1h1eHistone cluster 1, H1e
1.528P01900HLA-AMajor histocompatibility complex, class I, A
−1.82A0A068BD71HLA-DQA1Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 1
−1.809P01921HLA-DQB1Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ beta 1
−1.754P01915HLA-DRB5Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DR beta 5
−1.594Q861Q5HM13Histocompatibility minor 13
−1.791Q66K04IghImmunoglobulin heavy chain complex
−1.885P01868IGHG1Immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 1 (G1m marker)
−1.905P01872IGHMImmunoglobulin heavy constant mu
−1.94A0A075B5V1Ighv1-31Immunoglobulin heavy variable 1–31
−2.789A0A075B5J9Igkv17-127Immunoglobulin kappa variable 17–127
−2.286A0A0B4J1J0Igkv4-50Immunoglobulin kappa variable 4–50
−5.083Q9U410Igkv4-55Immunoglobulin kappa variable 4–55
−3.655A0A0B4J1J2Igkv5-43Immunoglobulin kappa chain variable 5–43
−7.651P01592JCHAINJoining chain of multimeric IgA and IgM
1.668Q8BHC0LYVE1Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1
−1.705Q6ZQJ2METAP1Methionyl aminopeptidase 1
−1.568Q61830MRC1Mannose receptor C-type 1
−2.894P97457MYLPFMyosin light chain, phosphorylatable, fast skeletal muscle
1.555Q3TF41NAP1L1Nucleosome assembly protein 1 like 1
1.534Q7TMG7NPR3Natriuretic peptide receptor 3
−2.226Q62422OSTF1Osteoclast stimulating factor 1
−1.722P08003PDIA4Protein disulfide isomerase family A member 4
1.556D3Z375PEA15Phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes 15
−1.885Q61753PHGDHPhosphoglycerate dehydrogenase
−1.921O35405PLD3Phospholipase D family member 3
−1.741Q99JY8PLPP3Phospholipid phosphatase 3
1.649Q6PD03PPP2R5AProtein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B’alpha
−1.637Q8C6Q7PTPRCProtein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type C
2.09Q99LE7PXNPaxillin
1.673Q9Z0J1RECKReversion inducing cysteine rich protein with kazal motifs
−5.949Q9JM62REEP6Receptor accessory protein 6
−2.315Q9EP95RetnlaResistin-like alpha
−2.726P07091S100A4S100 calcium binding protein A4
−3.757Q6ZPE2SBF1SET binding factor 1
−2.48D6RFV4SEC11CSEC11 homolog C, signal peptidase complex subunit
−2.004Q3TT70SEL1LSEL1L ERAD E3 ligase adaptor subunit
1.583P07759SERPINA3Serpin family A member 3
−2.036Q3U0Y1Serpina3g (includes others)Serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 3G
−2.852G3X9V8SERPINB4Serpin family B member 4
−5.387P97298SERPINF1Serpin family F member 1
−2.29Q08189TGM3Transglutaminase 3
−4.72A2AQJ7TMEM87ATransmembrane protein 87A
1.547Q5SVT2TRIM16Tripartite motif containing 16
−1.52Q62348TSNTranslin
1.565Q9CQU0TXNDC12Thioredoxin domain containing 12
−1.979E9PXX7TXNDC5Thioredoxin domain containing 5
−1.803Q0VGU5VKORC1L1Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 like 1

Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in the CON group compared with the MOD group.

Table 5

Expression fold changeIDSymbolEntrez gene name
−1.548O89054ACTBActin beta
1.871Q9JI91ACTN2Actinin alpha 2
1.698Q9R0Y5AK1Adenylate kinase 1
−1.711O35640ANXA8/ANX A8L1Annexin A8 like 1
−1.784Q00623APOA1Apolipoprotein A1
−1.642Q810I7APOA4Apolipoprotein A4
−1.633Q61176ARG1Arginase 1
1.554Q3TJD4ATP5F1ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial Fo complex subunit B1
−1.99O54962BANF1Barrier to autointegration factor 1
2.894P16015CA3Carbonic anhydrase 3
−1.533Q91XA9CHIAChitinase, acidic
1.626P07310CKMCreatine kinase, M-type
1.76P23927CRYABCrystallin alpha B
−2.023P00184CYP1A1Cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1
−1.781Q9R126Ear7Eosinophil-associated, ribonuclease A family, member 7
1.613Q922K6EIF4BEukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B
3.173P04117FABP4Fatty acid binding protein 4
−1.7G3X9U9FIS1Fission, mitochondrial 1
−1.743Q3THE6FTLFerritin light chain
1.504Q3UDC0GBP2Guanylate binding protein 2
1.742E9QAZ2Gm10020Ribosomal protein L15 pseudogene
1.59D3YVC6Gm21596/Hmgb1High mobility group box 1
1.655P05201GOT1Glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1
1.758E0CXN5GPD1Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1
−1.56Q3UTB8GRPEL1GrpE like 1, mitochondrial
−1.636Q3UA95H2AFZH2A histone family member Z
1.792Q61425HADHHydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase
1.727A8DUV1HBA1/HBA2Hemoglobin subunit alpha 2
2.253P43274Hist1h1eHistone cluster 1, H1e
1.592P01900HLA-AMajor histocompatibility complex, class I, A
1.676Q9JHU9ISYNA1Inositol-3-phosphate synthase 1
2.221Q8BHC0LYVE1Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1
1.58F6TBV1MAGT1Magnesium transporter 1
1.63E0CYU5MAT2BMethionine adenosyltransferase 2B
1.541Q9D1H9MFAP4Microfibrillar associated protein 4
2.021P34884MIFMacrophage migration inhibitory factor (glycosylation-inhibiting factor)
4.167E9QK82MPZMyelin protein zero
2.178Q3TF37MYBPC3Myosin binding protein C, cardiac
1.517Q02566MYH6Myosin heavy chain 6
1.782A2A6Q8MYL4Myosin light chain 4
1.661Q9QVP4MYL7Myosin light chain 7
1.609P97457MYLPFMyosin light chain, phosphorylatable, fast skeletal muscle
1.591Q14BI5MYOM2Myomesin 2
1.825O35683NDUFA1NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit A1
1.509Q9DC69NDUFA9NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit A9
1.545Q9DC70NDUFS7NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S7
1.829Q3TF69PCBP2Poly(rC) binding protein 2
1.631P47857PFKMPhosphofructokinase, muscle
1.634O35129PHB2Prohibitin 2
1.513Q3TD51PICALMPhosphatidylinositol binding clathrin assembly protein
−1.698Q99JY8PLPP3Phospholipid phosphatase 3
1.53Q9WUB3PYGMGlycogen phosphorylase, muscle associated
−1.572Q9EP95RetnlaResistin like alpha
1.523Q9D1R9Rpl34 (includes others)Ribosomal protein L34
1.88Q9JJI8RPL38Ribosomal protein L38
1.666P62267RPS23Ribosomal protein S23
−1.779Q9JL08S100A1S100 calcium binding protein A1
−1.59P07091S100A4S100 calcium binding protein A4
1.534Q8BGH2SAMM50SAMM50 sorting and assembly machinery component
1.701P36536SAR1ASecretion associated Ras related GTPase 1A
−1.541A2BE92SETSET nuclear proto-oncogene
1.804Q7TQ48SRLSarcalumenin
1.924K3W4R6TNNT2Troponin T2, cardiac type
−1.6Q62348TSNTranslin
1.595Q9CQM5TXNDC17Thioredoxin domain containing 17
1.93Q78IK2USMG5Up-regulated during skeletal muscle growth 5 homolog (mouse)
−1.707P68510YWHAHTyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein eta

DEPs in the GBF group compared with the MOD group.

Analysis of Proteomic Data via IPA

Proteomic Analysis of the Model

Proteomic data were analyzed via IPA, in which proteins are analyzed as a network using canonical pathways, disease networks, and predicted upstream regulators. Bioinformatic analysis showed that the model was involved in 165 pathways and 80 biological functions (Figure 3). Functional enrichments in inflammatory response, respiratory diseases, and inflammatory disease suggest that this model exhibits significant pulmonary inflammation. The high degree of enrichment in organismal injury and abnormalities, connective tissue disorders, and tissue morphology also suggests substantial changes in histomorphology. Humoral immune response and immune cell trafficking were also highly involved. The top 20 enriched disease and function terms are shown in Figure 3A. Canonical pathway analysis of the data revealed that our established model significantly activated multiple pathways in the mouse immune system; these included B-cell development, calcium-induced lymphocyte apoptosis, antigen presentation, iCOS-iCOSL signaling in T-helper cells, dendritic cell maturation, PKCθ signaling in T-lymphocytes, and Th1 and Th2 activation pathways. We also found that the DEPs were associated with 30 metabolic pathways. Upstream regulator predictions suggested that six inflammatory cytokines were upregulated and one downregulated (Z-Score > 1 or <−1); among the upregulated cytokines, the classical Th2 cytokines interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 drive M2 macrophage polarization in asthma pathogenesis (Table 6). Moreover, ARG1, MRC1, Chil3/Chil4, CHIA, and Retnla are typical cytokines secreted by M2 macrophages typical M2 cytokines that were found among the DEPs. In addition, GSF1, GSF2, cyclooxygenase, and prostaglandin E2 were significantly predicted upstream. These findings suggest that macrophages play an important role in this asthma model (Table 6). We further edited and expanded the functional network according to the molecular relationship most strongly correlated with the DEPs. The results showed that the DEPs constitute a reliable network and participate in inflammation and immune cell trafficking. The expression of the M2-type macrophage factors ARG1, MRC1, Chil3/Chil4, and Retnla is related to serum amyloid A (SAA) and cyclooxygenase. HBA1/HBA2 is a common biochemical indicator in the network. Therefore, there is abnormal blood oxygen saturation in the reaction state (Figure 3F).

FIGURE 3

Table 6

Upstream regulatorPredicted activation stateActivation z-scorep-value of overlapTarget molecules in dataset
CyclooxygenaseInhibited−22.86E-07ARG1, Chil3/Chil4, MRC1, Retnla
IL4Inhibited−2.4121.63E-06ARG1, ATP2A1, CAPG, Chil3/Chil4, Hist1h1e, IGHG1, JCHAIN, METAP1, MRC1, NAP1L1, Retnla, Serpina3g (includes others), SERPINB4
IL21Inhibited−2.2361.88E-04ARG1, HLA-DRB5, IGHG1, PTPRC, Serpina3g (includes others)
IL5Inhibited−2.3762.05E-04IGHG1, IGHM, JCHAIN, PTPRC, S100A4, Serpina3g (includes others)
Prostaglandin E2Inhibited−2.1912.23E-03ARG1, Chil3/Chil4, IGHG1, MRC1, Retnla
CSF1Inhibited−22.54E-03ARG1, MRC1, PTPRC, Retnla
CSF2Inhibited−2.2191.22E-02ADA, ARG1, HLA-DQB1, MRC1, PHGDH

Upstream analysis of CON vs. the MOD group.

Proteomic Analysis Revealed the Therapeutic Effects of GBFXD

Ingenuity pathway analysis correlation analysis was performed to compare the GBFXD treatment and model groups and a total of 159 pathways were found to be involved. Pathways with significant regulation included actin cytoskeleton signaling, rho regulation of actin-based motility, ILK signaling, and sirtuin signaling. In addition, highly enriched pathways included mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative phosphorylation. DEPs were found associated with 76 biological programs, 6 metabolic pathways, the immune program, and morphologically related programs; lipid and carbohydrate metabolism were the most enriched. Networks constructed with DEPs suggested that GBFXD treatment may have increased mitochondrial respiratory function and oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 4). Furthermore, we compared the highest scoring internetworks predicted by the two protein groups. Seven points were coincident (ARG1, cyclooxygenase, ERK1/2, HBA1/HBA2, hemoglobin, Retnla, and SAA; Figure 4); among them, ARG1, Retnla, and HBA1/HBA2 were common DEPs to both groups. Network analysis suggested that GBFXD regulates mitochondrial energy metabolism and corrects M2 factor expression. Moreover, it was predicted that IFNG is significantly activated after GBFXD treatment, which supports our previous experimental findings. Upstream regulatory factor prediction also suggested that GBFXD significantly inhibits RICTOR. Taken together, the two significant upstream predictions indicate that GBFXD inhibits M2 macrophages in our model.

FIGURE 4

Validation

We further performed western blot analysis and found that expression levels of ARG1, CHIA, and Retnla in lung tissue were significantly decreased in the GBFXD group (Figure 5, Supplementary Data Sheet S1). This result is in agreement with the protein levels measured by iTRAQ analysis and the changing trends in transcription indicated by qRT-PCR. Therefore, our proteomic analysis output was deemed reliable.

FIGURE 5

Discussion

Asthma is the most common chronic airway inflammation disorder whose incidence continues to increase worldwide. The pathophysiological features of asthma include continuous chronic airway inflammation, AHR, and airway remodeling. Moreover, there are dramatic epidemiological differences between childhood and adult asthma. As a first-line treatment for asthma, ICS is not well tolerated in children. Moreover, it may be difficult to diagnose asthma in certain children under the age of five (Pando et al., 2010; Klok et al., 2011; Bush, 2018; Ferrante and Grutta, 2018). As an alternative to ICS, several Asian countries employ GBFXD against asthma. Previous studies have shown that GBFXD reduces pulmonary inflammation during clinical remission in asthmatic mice (Huang et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2016) however, the mechanism remains unknown. Therefore, to understand the therapeutic role of GBFXD, we established a clinically consistent chronic asthmatic model and performed proteomic analysis. The study considerated the epidemiological characteristics of asthma in children; this subpopulation often presents with persistent allergen exposure inevitably (Szentpetery et al., 2017). Therefore, we increased the frequency of OVA challenges compared with that of our previous model. We compared both models and found that mice in the continuous OVA-induced model exhibit remarkable pathological features that were corroborated by lung function tests.

Alveolar macrophages, airway surface mucus, microorganisms, and airway epithelium constitute the first line of airway defense (Hussell and Bell, 2014). Macrophages can be adaptively polarized according to the metabolic characteristics of the tissue and immune environments. Macrophage polarization is categorized as the classical M1 type and the alternative M2 type. M1 polarization is pro-inflammatory and is initiated by adaptive immunity, whereas M2 polarization is anti-inflammatory and is critical for tissue damage and recovery during the late phases of infection (Wynn et al., 2013; Holtzman et al., 2014). M2 polarization mediates airway remodeling, matrix deposition, and other pathophysiological mechanisms in asthma (Wynn and Vannella, 2016). Th2 inflammatory factors are required to polarize macrophages toward the M2 phenotype (Dyken and Locksley, 2013). As OVA is often used to trigger Th2-type immune responses, the combination of OVA and RSV can aggravate Th2-type responses. Furthermore, excessive M2 macrophages are activated in lung tissue after RSV infection (Keegan et al., 2016; Naessens et al., 2016). Therefore, the increased M2 macrophage polarization exhibited by our model is credible.

Clinical studies have found that CD206+ macrophage is highly expressed in the trachea and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in asthmatic patients. The degree of its expression is correlated with biological sex, asthma severity, and lung function. However, CD206+ macrophage may be insensitive to ICS treatment (Melgert et al., 2010, 2011; Draijer et al., 2016). Markers of alternatively activated macrophages include MRC1, ARG1, Retnla, and Chil3 and these are upregulated in the lungs. Herein, proteomic analysis indicated the presence of M2 macrophage markers, MRC1, ARG1, Retnla, Chil3, and CHIA in asthmatic. GBFXD treatment inhibited these factors (Supplementary Figure S1A). The inhibitory effect on M2 macrophages by GBFXD may result from its therapeutic effect in attenuating airway remodeling and ARH, which interact with each other and constitute the hidden pathogen inducing susceptibility to asthma. Therefore, GBFXD may represent an alternative therapeutic agent against asthma.

The upstream predictive function of our experiment indicated that IL-4/IL-5/IL-13 are significantly activated in this model. Arg1 is induced by IL-4/IL-13 in macrophages and counterbalances inflammatory signals. L-arginine metabolism in macrophages is a defining feature of alternative versus classical macrophage activation (Duan et al., 2011). Moreover, chitinase-like protein is elevated in serum and mainly in alveolar cells and macrophages of the lungs of asthmatic patients (Chupp et al., 2007). ARG1 and CHIL3 are well-recognized susceptibility genes closely associated with childhood asthma that increase AHR and weaken lung function; additionally, the polymorphic and epigenetic states of ARG1 are associated with childhood asthma progression (Li et al., 2006; Ober et al., 2008; Salam et al., 2009; Cunningham et al., 2011). Retnla (resistin-like molecule-α), also known as FIZZ 1 (found in inflammatory zone 1), is also highly induced in allergic lung inflammation and bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis (Holcomb et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2014). Furthermore, macrophages can strongly express Retnla in chronic type 2 inflammation (Nair et al., 2003). In agreement, our proteomic analysis identified changes in these proteins that led to clinical outcomes. At the same time, lung function and pathology results also support these conclusions. Therefore, we believe that our model would be valuable in the study of chronic persistent asthma in children.

Mitochondria are the energy centers of cellular activity. They also maintain cellular ion homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Clinical studies have detected dysfunction and structural changes in the mitochondria of airway epithelial cells of asthmatic patients. Similar changes observed in asthmatic animal models indicated that abnormal oxidative stress, mitochondrial membrane potential, and energy metabolism occur (Mabalirajan et al., 2008; Aguilera and Bacsi, 2009; Zifa et al., 2012; Flaquer et al., 2014; Girodet et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017). Th1/Th2 imbalance also adversely affects mitochondrial function (Chang et al., 2009; Pattnaik et al., 2016). Furthermore, arginine and chitinase metabolism affect mitochondrial oxidative stress (Zhang et al., 2009; Chao and Carter, 2015; Xu et al., 2016). In the present study, proteomic analysis showed that after GBFXD treatment, NDUFA1, NDUFA9, NDUFS7, ATP5F1, and HADH were upregulated while FIS1 was downregulated. Pathway and network analyses also suggested that GBFXD increases ATP synthesis and that mitochondrial complex 1 interacts with mitigating M2 macrophage markers (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1B).

Conclusion

Treatment with GBFXD can improve Th1/Th2 balance, inhibit alternatively activated macrophages, and reduce AHR, mucus secretion, and airway remodeling. We believe that GBFXD shows efficacy due to its mechanism of action, specifically the improvement in macrophage polarization and restoration of mitochondrial function.

Statements

Ethics statement

All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Laboratory Animals and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (201810A026).

Author contributions

XZ conceived the project and designed the experiments. L-wL performed the data analysis and interpretation and Q-qX helped to write the manuscript. Q-qX, YL, MT, and Y-mD provided the experimental assistance. CD and YZ contributed to reagents, materials, and analysis tools.

Funding

This work was supported by the Major Research Plan of Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 15KJA360003), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81774367), the Innovation Program for Graduate Students of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant Nos. KYCX18_1553 and KYCX18_1555), the leading academics training program of Chinese Medicine in Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. SLJ0224) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.00441/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1

Effect of GBFXD on expression of M2 and mitochondrial complex 1 marker in macrophages in mouse models. (A) Lung tissue was fixed and sections were processed for Immunofluorescence detection of M2 macrophage (CD206+f4/80+). (B) After macrophage collected from Balf, total mRNA was isolated and examined for transcript levels of the mitochondrial complex 1 markers (NDUFA1, NDUFA9, NDUFS7, ATP5F1) by RT-PCR analysis. Values represent the means ± SE of three independent experiments with 3 replicates per experiment. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.0001; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.

TABLE S1

Primer sequences of NDUFA1, NDUFA9, NDUFS7, ATP5F1.

References

  • 1

    AguileraA. L.BacsiA. M. A. (2009). Mitochondrial dysfunction increases allergic airway inflammation.J. Immunol.18353795387. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900228

  • 2

    BatemanE. D.BousheyH. A.BousquetJ.BusseW. W.ClarkT. J.PauwelsR. A.et al (2004). Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? the gaining optimal asthma control study.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.170836844. 10.1164/rccm.200401-033oc

  • 3

    BushA. (2018). Management of asthma in children.Minerva Pediatr.70444457. 10.23736/S0026-4946.18.05351-3

  • 4

    CarrollK. N.GebretsadikT.EscobarG. J.WuP.LiS. X.WalshE. M.et al (2017). Respiratory syncytial virus immunoprophylaxis in high-risk infants and development of childhood asthma.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.1396671. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.055

  • 5

    ChangH. H.ChenC. S.LinJ. Y. (2009). High dose vitamin C supplementation increases the Th1/Th2 cytokine secretion ratio, but decreases eosinophilic infiltration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of ovalbumin-sensitized and challenged mice.J. Agric. Food Chem.571047110476. 10.1021/jf902403p

  • 6

    ChaoH.CarterA. B. (2015). The metabolic prospective and redox regulation of macrophage polarization.J. Clin. Cell. Immunol.6:371.

  • 7

    ChunW.QingR.Xue-TongC.SongZ. Q.NingZ. C.GanJ. H. (2018). System pharmacology-based strategy to decode the synergistic mechanism of zhi-zhu wan for functional dyspepsia.Front. Pharmacol.9:841. 10.3389/fphar.2018.00841

  • 8

    ChuppG. L.LeeC. G.JarjourN.ShimY. M.HolmC. T.HeS.et al (2007). A chitinase-like protein in the lung and circulation of patients with severe asthma.N. Engl. J. Med.35720162027. 10.1056/nejmoa073600

  • 9

    CunninghamJ.BasuK.TavendaleR.PalmerC. N.SmithH.MukhopadhyayS. (2011). The CHI3L1 rs4950928 polymorphism is associated with asthma-related hospital admissions in children and young adults.Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.106381386. 10.1016/j.anai.2011.01.030

  • 10

    DraijerC.BoorsmaC. E.RobbeP.TimensW.HylkemaM. N.Ten HackenN. H.et al (2016). Human asthma is characterized by more IRF5+ M1 and CD206+ M2 macrophages and less IL-10+ M2-like macrophages around airways compared with healthy airways.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.140280283. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.11.020

  • 11

    DuanQ. L.GaumeB. R.HawkinsG. A.HimesB. E.BleeckerE. R.KlandermanB.et al (2011). Regulatory haplotypes in ARG1 are associated with altered bronchodilator response.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.183449454. 10.1164/rccm.201005-0758OC

  • 12

    DykenS. J. V.LocksleyR. M. (2013). Interleukin-4- and interleukin-13-mediated alternatively activated macrophages: roles in homeostasis and disease.Annu. Rev. Immunol.31317343. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095906

  • 13

    EbmeierS.ThayabaranD.BraithwaiteI.BénamaraC.WeatherallM.BeasleyR. (2017). Trends in international asthma mortality: analysis of data from the who mortality database from 46 countries (1993–2012).Lancet390935945. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31448-4

  • 14

    FerranteG.GruttaS. L. (2018). The burden of pediatric asthma.Front. Pediatr.6:186. 10.3389/fped.2018.00186

  • 15

    FlaquerA.HeinzmannA.RospleszczS.MailaparambilB.DietrichH.StrauchK.et al (2014). Association study of mitochondrial genetic polymorphisms in asthmatic children.Mitochondrion144953. 10.1016/j.mito.2013.11.002

  • 16

    GaoB. Z.ChenJ. C.LiaoL. H.XuJ. Q.LinX. F.DingS. S. (2015). Erchen decoction prevents high-fat diet induced metabolic disorders in C57BL/6 mice.Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med.2015:501272.

  • 17

    GengY. Y.WangW. G.ZhangJ. H.BiS. Y.LiH. X.LinM. J. (2016). Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine herbs for tonifying Qi and kidney, and replenishing spleen on intermittent asthma in children aged 2 to 5 years old.J. Tradit. Chin. Med.363238. 10.1016/s0254-6272(16)30005-x

  • 18

    GirodetP. O.AllardB.ThumerelM.BegueretH.DupinI.OusovaO.et al (2015). Bronchial smooth muscle remodeling in non-severe asthma.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.193627633.

  • 19

    GraingeC. L.LauL. C.WardJ. A.DulayV.LahiffG.WilsonS.et al (2011). Effect of bronchoconstriction on airway remodeling in asthma.N. Engl. J. Med.36420062015. 10.1056/NEJMx180023

  • 20

    GuoX.LiZ.LingW.LongJ.SuC.LiJ.et al (2018). Epidemiology of childhood asthma in mainland china (1988-2014): a meta-analysis.Allergy Asthma Proc.391529. 10.2500/aap.2018.39.4131

  • 21

    HolcombI. N.KabakoffR. C.ChanB.BakerT. W.GurneyA.HenzelW.et al (2000). FIZZ1, a novel cysteine-rich secreted protein associated with pulmonary inflammation, defines a new gene family.EMBO J.1940464055. 10.1093/emboj/19.15.4046

  • 22

    HoltzmanM. J.ByersD. E.Alexander-BrettJ.WangX. (2014). The role of airway epithelial cells and innate immune cells in chronic respiratory disease.Nat. Rev. Immunol.14686698. 10.1038/nri3739

  • 23

    HuangT. P.LiuP. H.LienA. Y.YangS. L.ChangH. H.YenH. R. (2013). Characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine use in children with asthma: a nationwide population-based study.Allergy6816101613. 10.1111/all.12273

  • 24

    HuangZ.GaoL.ZhaoX.LingH.ChenW. (2016). Effect of Gubenfangxiao decoction on respiratory syncytial virus-induced asthma and expression of asthma susceptibility gene orosomucoid 1-like protein 3 in mice.J. Tradit. Chin. Med.36101106. 10.1016/s0254-6272(16)30015-2

  • 25

    HussellT.BellT. J. (2014). Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context.Nat. Rev. Immunol.148193. 10.1038/nri3600

  • 26

    JarttiT.GernJ. E. (2017). Role of viral infections in the development and exacerbation of asthma in children.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.140895906. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.08.003

  • 27

    KeeganA. D.ShireyK. A.BagdureD.BlancoJ.ViscardiR. M.VogelS. N. (2016). Enhanced allergic responsiveness after early childhood infection with respiratory viruses: are long-lived alternatively-activated macrophages the missing link?Pathog. Dis.74:ftw047. 10.1093/femspd/ftw047

  • 28

    KlokT.KapteinA.DuivermanE.BrandP. (2011). Poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma: don’t blame (only) the patient.Eur. Respir. J.38(Suppl. 55):4818.

  • 29

    LiH.RomieuI.Sienra-MongeJ. J.Ramirez-AguilarM.Estela Del Rio-NavarroB.KistnerE. O.et al (2006). Genetic polymorphisms in Arginase I and II and childhood asthma and atopy.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.117119126. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.026

  • 30

    LiuC. H. (2019). The prevalence, diagnosis and management of asthma in children in China.J. Otolaryngol. Ophthalmol. Shandong University, 332832.

  • 31

    LiuC. H.ChenY. Z. (2013). Analysis of the epidemiology and the present situation of prevention and treatment of asthma in chilren in China.Chinese J. Pract. Pediatr.28809811.

  • 32

    LiuT.YuH.UllenbruchM.JinH.ItoT.WuZ.et al (2014). The in vivo fibrotic role of FIZZ1 in pulmonary fibrosis.PLoS One9:e88362. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088362

  • 33

    LuY.XuJ. Y.ZhangX. H.ZhaoX. (2016). Gu-Ben-Fang-Xiao decoction attenuates sustained airway inflammation by suppressing ER stress response in a murine asthma remission model of respiratory syncytial virus infection.J. Ethnopharmacol.192496509. 10.1016/j.jep.2016.09.039

  • 34

    MabalirajanU.DindaA. K.KumarS.RoshanR.GuptaP.SharmaS. K.et al (2008). Mitochondrial structural changes and dysfunction are associated with experimental allergic asthma.J. Immunol.18135403548. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.3540

  • 35

    MelgertB. N.OrissT. B.QiZ.Dixon-McCarthyB.GeerlingsM.HylkemaM. N.et al (2010). Macrophages: regulators of sex differences in asthma?Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.42595603. 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0016OC

  • 36

    MelgertB. N.ten HackenN. H.RutgersB.TimensW.PostmaD. S.HylkemaM. N. (2011). More alternative activation of macrophages in lungs of asthmatic patients.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.127831833. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.045

  • 37

    NaessensT.SchepensB.SmetM.PollardC.Van HoeckeL.De BeuckelaerA.et al (2016). GM-CSF treatment prevents respiratory syncytial virus-induced pulmonary exacerbation responses in postallergic mice by stimulating alveolar macrophage maturation.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.137700709. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.031

  • 38

    NairM. G.CochraneD. W.AllenJ. E. (2003). Macrophages in chronic type 2 inflammation have a novel phenotype characterized by the abundant expression of Ym1 and Fizz1 that can be partly replicated in vitro.Immunol. Lett.85173180. 10.1016/s0165-2478(02)00225-0

  • 39

    OberC.TanZ.SunY.PossickJ. D.PanL.NicolaeR. (2008). Effect of variation in CHI3L1 on serum YKL-40 level, risk of asthma, and lung function.N. Engl. J. Med.35816821691. 10.1056/NEJMoa0708801

  • 40

    PandoS.LemièreC.BeauchesneM. F.PerreaultS.ForgetA.BlaisL. (2010). Suboptimal use of inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: inadequate prescription, poor drug adherence, or both?Pharmacotherapy3011091116. 10.1592/phco.30.11.1109

  • 41

    PapiA.BrightlingC.PedersenS. E.ReddelH. K. (2018). Asthma.Lancet391783800. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33311-1

  • 42

    PattnaikB.BodasM.BhatrajuN. K.AhmadT.PantR.GuleriaR.et al (2016). IL-4 promotes asymmetric dimethylarginine accumulation, oxo-nitrative stress, and hypoxic response-induced mitochondrial loss in airway epithelial cells.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.138130.e9141.e9. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.11.036

  • 43

    PhippsS.LamC. E.MahalingamS.NewhouseM.RamirezR.RosenbergH. F.et al (2007). Eosinophils contribute to innate antiviral immunity and promote clearance of respiratory syncytial virus.Blood11015781586. 10.1182/blood-2007-01-071340

  • 44

    SalamM. T.IslamT.GaudermanW. J.GillilandF. D. (2009). Roles of arginase variants, atopy, and ozone in childhood asthma.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.123596.e8602.e8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.020

  • 45

    SzentpeteryS. S.GruzievaO.FornoE.HanY. Y.BergströmA.KullI.et al (2017). Combined effects of multiple risk factors on asthma in school-aged children.Respir. Med.1331621. 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.11.002

  • 46

    WangC. M.ZhangX. J.YingJ. M. A.LiX. (2017). Mutational analysis of mitochondrial tRNA genes in patients with asthma.Iran. J. Public Health46620625.

  • 47

    WangD.ZhangB. B.QuX. X.GaoF.YuanM. Y. (2015). Microwave-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Yupingfeng powder and their antioxidant activity.Pharmacogn. Mag.11546554. 10.4103/0973-1296.160468

  • 48

    WilliamD.PingshengW.TebebG.TinaH. (2018). Rsv prevention in infancy and asthma in later life.Lancet Respir. Med.6:e32. 10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30231-5

  • 49

    WynnT. A.ChawlaA.PollardJ. W. (2013). Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease.Nature496445455. 10.1038/nature12034

  • 50

    WynnT. A.VannellaK. M. (2016). Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis.Immunity44450462. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015

  • 51

    XuW.GhoshS.ComhairS. A.AsosinghK.JanochaA. J.MavrakisD. A.et al (2016). Increased mitochondrial arginine metabolism supports bioenergetics in asthma.J. Clin. Invest.12624652481. 10.1172/JCI82925

  • 52

    YuanX. J.SunY. Q.WangS. M.LiY. N.WangM. Q.LiuX. R. (2010). Clinical research of Gubenfangxiao decoction combined with point application on chronic asthmatic children in 100 cases.Zhong Hua Zhong Yi Yao Za Zhi2123062309

  • 53

    YueS. J.XinL. T.FanY. C.LiS. J.TangY. P.DuanJ. A.et al (2017). Herb pair Danggui-Honghua: mechanisms underlying blood stasis syndrome by system pharmacology approach.Sci. Rep.7:40318. 10.1038/srep40318

  • 54

    ZhangL.PeeplesM. E.BoucherR. C.CollinsP. L.PicklesR. J. (2002). Respiratory syncytial virus infection of human airway epithelial cells is polarized, specific to ciliated cells, and without obvious cytopathology.J. Virol.7656545666. 10.1128/JVI.76.11.5654-5666.2002

  • 55

    ZhangL.WangM.KangX.BoontheungP.LiN.NelA. E.et al (2009). Oxidative stress and asthma: proteome analysis of chitinase-like proteins and FIZZ1 in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.J. Proteome Res.816311638. 10.1021/pr800685h

  • 56

    ZifaE.DaniilZ.SkoumiE.StavrouM.PapadimitriouK.TerzenidouM.et al (2012). Mitochondrial genetic background plays a role in increasing risk to asthma.Mol. Biol. Rep.3946974708. 10.1007/s11033-011-1262-8

Summary

Keywords

GU-BEN-FANG-XIAO decoction, iTRAQ, chronic persistent asthma, macrophage, IPA

Citation

Liu L, Xing Q, Zhao X, Tan M, Lu Y, Dong Y, Dai C and Zhang Y (2019) Proteomic Analysis Provides Insights Into the Therapeutic Effect of GU-BEN-FANG-XIAO Decoction on a Persistent Asthmatic Mouse Model. Front. Pharmacol. 10:441. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00441

Received

23 October 2018

Accepted

08 April 2019

Published

07 May 2019

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited by

Aiping Lu, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

Reviewed by

Wei Song, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), China; Songxiao Xu, Artron BioResearch Inc., Canada

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xia Zhao,

This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics