OPINION article

Front. Pharmacol., 15 September 2020

Sec. Translational Pharmacology

Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.575444

The Potential of Antiviral Peptides as COVID-19 Therapeutics

  • 1. School of Biosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia

  • 2. Division of Biomedical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia

Introduction

To date, more than 17 million cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 900,000 deaths have been reported globally (). Major collaborative efforts focusing on the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and antiviral therapeutics are accelerated at an unprecedented rate. Various therapeutic agents quickly taken into clinical trials are largely based on existing drugs with non-specific antiviral activities or compounds pharmacologically speculated to be effective in enhancing the overall clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients. To name a few, these include the nucleoside inhibitor prodrug remdesivir (GS-5734), the antiparasitic drug ivermectin, the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir, the anti-inflammatory drug cepharanthine, the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, the general steroid dexamethasone, and others (; ; ; ; ). However, only dexamethasone and remdesivir appear to confer promising treatment outcomes by reducing deaths or time to clinical improvement in the severe COVID-19 patients (; ; ). The world is extremely desperate for a cure or prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 with the hope of saving more lives. Nevertheless, little has been described for antiviral peptides (AVPs) or alternatively known as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that possess antiviral activities. AVPs are a class of short (8–40 amino acids in length) polycationic antivirals with potent broad spectrum antiviral activities (; ; ; ; ; ). Interestingly, there are AVPs demonstrated to exert prophylactic and therapeutic effects against coronaviruses (CoVs). In this opinion paper, we describe the potential use of AVPs against COVID-19 based on the documented evidence against SARS-CoV2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, SARS-related CoVs, and other respiratory viruses that shall warrant further development of this class of compounds in the face of the current pandemic threat.

Mechanism of Viral Infection

SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped virus with the characteristic spike (S) glycoprotein to mediate viral entry via the cell surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) (Zhou et al., 2020). The S1 subunit of S protein is the receptor-binding domain responsible for ACE2 binding (). Subsequently, a cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 is required for S protein priming, which induces proteolytic cleavage of S protein at S1/S2 and S2’ sites (). Following cleavage, both heptapeptide repeat 1 (HR1) and heptapeptide repeat 2 (HR2) regions of the S2 subunit of S protein interact to form the 6-helix bundle (6HB) fusion core (; ). The formation of 6HB is critical in facilitating the viral membrane fusion process for viral entry into the host cell via endocytosis. During the late endosomal stage, endosomal acidification would induce virus-endosome membrane fusion, thereby leading to viral uncoating (viral RNA release) for the initiation of viral replication and infection (; ; ). Notably, the S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 showed a 10- to 20-fold higher ACE2 binding affinity comparing to SARS-CoV, which may explain the higher transmissibility and infectivity of COVID-19 ().

Targeting the Viral Envelope

Mucroporin-M1 (LFRLIKSLIKRLVSAFK) is a peptide analog designed with four residual mutations at positions G3R, P6K, G10K, and G11R from the parent peptide mucroporin (LFGLIPSLIGGLVSAFK) isolated from the venom of the scorpion Lychas mucronatus (; ). Such increase in cationicity enhanced the dipolar characteristic of the peptide helix, which contributed to the drastic increment in antiviral activity against SARS-CoV (50% virus infection, EC50 of 14.46 µg/ml), influenza H5N1 (EC50 of 2.10 µg/ml), and measles (EC50 of 7.15 µg/ml) pseudoviruses (). Based on the observations that mucroporin-M1 directly interacted with measles viral particles and a greater antiviral effect with pre-treatment, mucroporin-M1 was proposed to serve the role of a molecular blocker, which must find its target before viral attachment to the host cells (Figure 1). Following peptide-virus binding, the strong electrostatic affinity of mucroporin-M1 could allow interaction and disruption of the viral envelope, thereby exerting a direct virucidal effect against SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and influenza H5N1 viruses ().

Figure 1

Targeting the Spike (S) Glycoprotein

EK1 (SLDQINVTFLDLEYEMKKLEEAIKKLEESYIDLKEL) is a pan-CoV fusion inhibitor designed by Xia and colleagues. This 36-residue peptide showed high cross-reactivity against all SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and three SARS-related CoVs from bats tested (). As shown in Figure 1, EK1 acts by blocking the HR1 domain to disrupt the formation of the 6HB core, which causes inhibition of viral fusion entry into the host cell (). Intranasal application of EK1 further protected mice from pre- and post-challenges by the HCoV-OC43 alphacoronavirus and MERS-CoV challenges. Such dual therapeutic and prophylactic effects displayed by a single compound against various closely related CoVs are highly desirable. The broad spectrum anti-CoV activity strongly suggests that EK1 could be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recently, a highly potent lipopeptide variant EK1C4 was generated by C-terminally conjugating EK1 with a cholesterol moiety using a glycine/serine linker and a polyethylene glycol (PEG) spacer (-EK1-GSGSG-PEG4-chol) (). The results were exciting, where SARS-CoV-2 cell-cell fusion was severely impaired at 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 1.3nM, while anti-SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses infection activity was recorded at 15.8 nM. Notably, the SARS-CoV-2 HR1 protein binding affinity of EK1C4 was drastically enhanced by 226-fold, which also explained the observed 149-fold higher in antiviral activity of EK1C4 as compared to EK1. It was hypothesized that the conjugated cholesterol might have a profound role in facilitating EK1C4 binding toward the HR1 protein. Indeed, cholesterol conjugation enhancement of antiviral activity had previously been reported with the HIV-1 fusion inhibitor C34 (). Besides EK1C4, HR2P-M2 was a peptide designed based on the 6HB core of MERS-CoV HR1 and HR2 domains (). This peptide acted by blocking the S protein-mediated membrane fusion mechanism of MERS-CoV. Of note, intranasal administration of HR2P-M2 was found to significantly reduce lung viral titers by >1,000-fold and protected the mice from MERS-CoV infection (). However, the narrow specificity of HR2P-M2 against MERS-CoV but not SARS-CoV may indirectly suggest an insufficient cross-reactivity with HR2P-M2 against other betacoronaviruses.

Inhibition of Endosomal Acidification

The mouse β-defensins-4 derived P9 (NGAICWGPCPTAFRQIGNCGHFKVRCCKIR) was shown to bind to the MERS-CoV S2 subunit and remained co-localized with the viruses without inhibiting viral entry into the host cell via endocytosis (Zhao et al., 2016). While in the endosomes, the polycationic property of P9 induced a basic microenvironment to prevent endosomal acidification of the late endosomes. Without endosomal acidification, the pH-dependent activation of viral fusion proteins to initiate viral-host endosomal membrane fusion failed to occur and thus the critical step in viral uncoating prior to viral RNA release (Figure 1). This mechanism of action was indeed highly effective, broadly inhibiting SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and a diverse panel of influenza viruses H1N1, H3N2, H5N1, H7N7, and H7N9. Such target specificity nature of P9 also partly explained the low cytotoxic property of P9 (IC50 of 380 µg/ml) against the mammalian Madin-Darby canine kidney cells tested. The broad therapeutic windows of P9 would be a significant advantage in the future development of P9 as an antiviral agent. Notably, P9 displayed both prophylactic and therapeutic effects as observed in an in vivo SARS-CoV mouse model of infection (Zhao et al., 2016).

For the Host: Shielding the Cell Receptors

ACE2 is well-known as the primary receptor for CoV at the first step of viral infection. It was found that HD5 (ATCYCRTGRCATRESLSGVCEISGRLYRLCCR), a natural lectin-like human defensins-5 (HD5) peptide secreted by the Paneth cells in the crypts of Lieberkuhn, could interact with glycosylated proteins and lipid components (). Based on the structural and biochemical properties, HD5 was initially hypothesized to recognize and inhibit SARS-CoV-2 S protein, host cell ACE2 or both of these target components (). However, it was later confirmed that HD5 competitively blocked ACE2 receptors on the host cells instead of targeting the viral S1 subunit (Figure 1). The high-affinity binding between HD5 and the ligand-binding domain of ACE2 through the formation of multiple hydrogen bonds effectively shielded (protected) the host cells from viral recognition and infection.

Antiviral Immunomodulatory Effect

The cyclic peptide RTD-1 (GFCRCLCRRGVCRCICTR) from rhesus macaque leukocytes was reported to decrease disease pathogenesis of SARS-CoV infection in mice, as observed with a substantial reduction in perivascular infiltrate and necrotizing bronchiolitis (). Interestingly, neither did RTD-1 inhibit the virus or interact with the host cell receptors to exert an antiviral effect. In contrast, it was noticed that the virus titers and lung tissue nucleocapsid (N) gene antigen expression were similar to the untreated control mice. Together with an increase in cytokine levels of interleukin-6, keratinocyte chemoattractant, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in lung cell homogenates, RTD-1 was suggested to act as an immunomodulatory effector molecule via a blunted proinflammatory cytokine response in eliminating SARS-CoV ().

Discussion

Prioritization and emergency preparedness in responding to the emerging infectious diseases associated with outbreaks and pandemics are of utmost urgency. In search of an effective antiviral against COVID-19, we believe AVPs could represent one of the potential classes of new antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2. It is fascinating to discover how AVPs, composed principally of short and simple amino acid sequences, could interact with and specifically target the different viral components to achieve potent antiviral effects. Here, we would like to bring the attention to a number of AVPs with highly promising anti-CoV activities: mucroporin-M1 disrupts viral envelope, HR2P-M2 targets the viral S protein-mediated fusion mechanism, EK1 and EK1C4 block the HR1 domain of viral S2 subunit, and P9 peptide inhibits late endosomal acidification and thus preventing viral RNA release. Besides, there are AVPs that confer protection to the host: RTD-1 is an antiviral immunomodulator that triggers protective immunity; HD5 binds to and shields host ACE2 receptor to prevent viral recognition and attachment. Recent findings have gathered evidence on the potential role of a host serine protease TMPRSS2 in facilitating the S protein priming process of SARS-CoV-2 that is crucial for the subsequent viral membrane fusion events (). Furthermore, the newly discovered S protein furin-like cleavage site and the novel CD147-mediated viral entry pathway could have important implications in SARS-CoV-2 viral pathogenicity (; ; ). These key viral components could represent valuable targets in the development of novel antiviral agents. Cocktail therapy using a selected combination of AVPs or as supplemental therapeutics in combination with other classes of antiviral agents could be a promising treatment strategy that would worth further clinical investigations (). Such optimism is not unfounded, as enfuvirtide, a 36-amino acid fusion inhibitor AVP, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2003 for treatment against human immunodeficiency virus in combination with other antiretroviral drugs (; ; ). It acts by blocking the HR1 domain of the viral envelope glycoprotein 41. Sifuvertide, an AVP with enhanced potency and a lower threshold for resistance than enfuvirtide, is currently under phase III trials in China (; ; ; ). Although clinical trials of AVPs against CoVs have not been reported thus far, the dire need for an effective anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent could potentially reshape the drug discovery landscape as with the initiation of Operation Warp Speed by the US government in April 2020 for COVID-19 vaccine, therapeutic, and diagnostic development (). In conclusion, AVPs are structurally and functionally versatile owing to its simple primary structure and could serve as the molecular templates for the generation of fast-track therapeutic candidates in the face of COVID-19 or emerging outbreaks posing severe public health threats in the unpredictable future. Given its unique and promising antiviral activity, the potential use of AVPs in clinical treatment and as prophylaxis against COVID-19 should be further explored.

Funding

The current work was supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE), grant number FRGS/1/2018/STG05/UNIM/03/1.

Statements

Author contributions

AM, YL, C-MF, H-SL, and CL conceived the idea. AM and CL wrote the article. YL, C-MF, and H-SL provided critical comments on the article. AM, YL, C-MF, H-SL, and CL revised the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AhmedA.Siman-TovG.HallG.BhallaN.NarayananA. (2019). Human antimicrobial peptides as therapeutics for viral infections. Viruses11, 704. doi: 10.3390/v11080704

  • 2

    CalyL.DruceJ. D.CattonM. G.JansD. A.WagstaffK. M. (2020). The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antiviral Res. 178, 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787

  • 3

    ChangK. Y.YangJ. R. (2013). Analysis and Prediction of Highly Effective Antiviral Peptides Based on Random Forests. PLoS One. 11, 704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070166

  • 4

    ChannappanavarR.LuL.XiaS.DuL.MeyerholzD. K.PerlmanS.et al. (2015). Protective effect of intranasal regimens containing peptidic middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus fusion inhibitor against MERS-CoV infection. J. Infect. Dis. 212, 1894–1903. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv325

  • 5

    CohenJ. (2020). Unveiling ‘Warp Speed,’ the White House’s America-first push for a coronavirus vaccine. Sci. (80-. ). doi: 10.1126/science.abc7056

  • 6

    CoutardB.ValleC.de LamballerieX.CanardB.SeidahN. G.DecrolyE. (2020). The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 176, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742

  • 7

    DaiC.MaY.ZhaoZ.ZhaoR.WangQ.WuY.et al. (2008). Mucroporin, the first cationic host defense peptide from the venom of Lychas mucronatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 3967–3972. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00542-08

  • 8

    DasK.AraminiJ. M.MaL. C.KrugR. M.ArnoldE. (2010). Structures of influenza A proteins and insights into antiviral drug targets. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 530–538. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1779

  • 9

    DuL.HeY.ZhouY.LiuS.ZhengB. J.JiangS. (2009). The spike protein of SARS-CoV - A target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 226–236. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2090

  • 10

    FungH. B.GuoY. (2004). Enfuvirtide: A fusion inhibitor for the treatment of HIV infection. Clin. Ther. 26, 352–378. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(04)90032-X

  • 11

    GreinJ.OhmagariN.ShinD.DiazG.AspergesE.CastagnaA.et al. (2020). Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 2327–2336. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016

  • 12

    HeY.XiaoY.SongH.LiangQ.JuD.ChenX.et al. (2008). Design and evaluation of sifuvirtide, a novel HIV-1 fusion inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 11126–11134. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800200200

  • 13

    HoffmannM.Kleine-WeberH.SchroederS.KrügerN.HerrlerT.ErichsenS.et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell181, 271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

  • 14

    HollmannA.MatosP. M.AugustoM. T.CastanhoM. A. R. B.SantosN. C. (2013). Conjugation of Cholesterol to HIV-1 Fusion Inhibitor C34 Increases Peptide-Membrane Interactions Potentiating Its Action. PLoS One. 8, e60302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060302

  • 15

    KangS.PengW.ZhuY.LuS.ZhouM.LinW.et al. (2020). Recent progress in understanding 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) associated with human respiratory disease: detection, mechanisms and treatment. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 55, 1059. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105950

  • 16

    LalezariJ. P.HenryK.O’HearnM.MontanerJ. S. G.PilieroP. J.TrottierB.et al. (2003). Enfuvirtide, an HIV-1 fusion inhibitor, for drug-resistant HIV infection in North and South America. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2175–2185. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035026

  • 17

    LedfordH. (2020). Coronavirus breakthrough: dexamethasone is first drug shown to save lives. Nature582, 469. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01824-5

  • 18

    LetkoM.MarziA.MunsterV. (2020). Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 562–569. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y

  • 19

    LiQ.ZhaoZ.ZhouD.ChenY.HongW.CaoL.et al. (2011). Virucidal activity of a scorpion venom peptide variant mucroporin-M1 against measles, SARS-CoV and influenza H5N1 viruses. Peptides32, 1518–1525. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.05.015

  • 20

    LiuS.XiaoG.ChenY.HeY.NiuJ.EscalanteC. R.et al. (2004). Interaction between heptad repeat 1 and 2 regions in spike protein of SARS-associated coronavirus: Implications for virus fusogenic mechanism and identification of fusion inhibitors. Lancet363, 938–947. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15788-7

  • 21

    NyanguileO. (2019). Peptide antiviral strategies as an alternative to treat lower respiratory viral infections. Front. Immunol. 10, 1366. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01366

  • 22

    OhashiH.WatashiK.SasoW.ShionoyaK.IwanamiS.HirokawaT.et al. (2020). Multidrug treatment with nelfinavir and cepharanthine against COVID-19. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.14.039925

  • 23

    PovedaE.BrizV.SorianoV. (2005). Enfuvirtide, the first fusion inhibitor to treat HIV infection. AIDS Rev. 7, 139–147. doi: 10.1517/14656566.6.3.453

  • 24

    SalaA.ArdizzoniA.CiociolaT.MaglianiW.ContiS.BlasiE.et al. (2019). Antiviral Activity of Synthetic Peptides Derived from Physiological Proteins. Intervirology61, 166–173. doi: 10.1159/000494354

  • 25

    SkalickovaS.HegerZ.KrejcovaL.PekarikV.BastlK.JandaJ.et al. (2015). Perspective of use of antiviral peptides against influenza virus. Viruses7, 5428–5442. doi: 10.3390/v7102883

  • 26

    SuY.ChongH.QiuZ.XiongS.HeY. (2015). Mechanism of HIV-1 Resistance to Short-Peptide Fusion Inhibitors Targeting the Gp41 Pocket. J. Virol. 89, 5801–5811. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00373-15

  • 27

    Vanden EyndeJ. J. (2020). Covid-19: A brief overview of the discovery clinical trial. Pharmaceuticals13, 65. doi: 10.3390/ph13040065

  • 28

    Vilas BoasL. C. P.CamposM. L.BerlandaR. L. A.de Carvalho NevesN.FrancoO. L. (2019). Antiviral peptides as promising therapeutic drugs. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 3525–3542. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03138-w

  • 29

    WangR. R.YangL. M.WangY. H.PangW.TamS. C.TienP.et al. (2009). Sifuvirtide, a potent HIV fusion inhibitor peptide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 382, 540–544. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.057

  • 30

    WangC.WangS.LiD.ZhaoX.HanS.WangT.et al. (2020). Lectin-like Intestinal Defensin Inhibits 2019-nCoV Spike binding to ACE2. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.29.013490

  • 31

    WangK.ChenW.ZhouY.-S.LianJ.-Q.ZhangZ.DuP.et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 invades host cells via a novel route: CD147-spike protein. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.14.988345

  • 32

    WangY.ZhangD.DuG.DuR.ZhaoJ.JinY.et al. (2020). Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet395, 1569–1578. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9

  • 33

    Wohlford-LenaneC. L.MeyerholzD. K.PerlmanS.ZhouH.TranD.SelstedM. E.et al. (2009). Rhesus Theta-Defensin Prevents Death in a Mouse Model of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Pulmonary Disease. J. Virol. 83, 11385–11390. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01363-09

  • 34

    World Health Organization (2020). Coronavirus Dis. Situat. Reports. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports (Accessed July 2, 2020).

  • 35

    WrappD.WangN.CorbettK. S.GoldsmithJ. A.HsiehC. L.AbionaO.et al. (2020). Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science (80-. ). 367, 1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0902

  • 36

    XiaS.YanL.XuW.AgrawalA. S.AlgaissiA.TsengC. T. K.et al. (2019). A pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting the HR1 domain of human coronavirus spike. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav4580. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav4580

  • 37

    XiaS.LiuM.WangC.XuW.LanQ.FengS.et al. (2020a). Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 30, 343–355. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0305-x

  • 38

    XiaS.ZhuY.LiuM.LanQ.XuW.WuY.et al. (2020b). Fusion mechanism of 2019-nCoV and fusion inhibitors targeting HR1 domain in spike protein. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 17, 765–767. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0374-2

  • 39

    YuD.DingX.LiuZ.WuX.ZhuY.WeiH.et al. (2018). Molecular mechanism of HIV-1 resistance to sifuvirtide, a clinical trial–approved membrane fusion inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem.293, 12703–12718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003538

  • 40

    ZhaoH.ZhouJ.ZhangK.ChuH.LiuD.PoonV. K. M.et al. (2016). A novel peptide with potent and broad-spectrum antiviral activities against multiple respiratory viruses. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–13. doi: 10.1038/srep22008

  • 41

    ZhouP.YangX.-L.WangX. G.HuB.ZhangL.ZhangW.et al. (2020). A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature579, 270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7

Summary

Keywords

antiviral peptides, antimicrobial peptides, antiviral prophylaxis, antiviral agents, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, coronaviruses, infectious disease

Citation

Mahendran ASK, Lim YS, Fang C-M, Loh H-S and Le CF (2020) The Potential of Antiviral Peptides as COVID-19 Therapeutics. Front. Pharmacol. 11:575444. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.575444

Received

06 July 2020

Accepted

28 August 2020

Published

15 September 2020

Volume

11 - 2020

Edited by

Paolo Montuschi, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy

Reviewed by

Hassan Zaraket, American University of Beirut, Lebanon

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Cheng Foh Le,

This article was submitted to Translational Pharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics