Abstract
Because nitric oxide and endothelial dysfunction could play a role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS), as was suggested by some preliminary data, we investigated the possible association between the rs2070744 variants in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS or NOS3) gene (chromosome 7q36.1) and the risk for RLS in a Caucasian Spanish population. We assessed the frequencies of NOS3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs2070744, rs1799983, and rs79467411 genotypes and allelic variants in 273 patients with idiopathic RLS and 325 healthy controls using a TaqMan-based qPCR assay. We also analyzed the possible influence of genotype frequency on age at onset of RLS symptoms, gender, family history of RLS, and response to drugs commonly used in the treatment of RLS such as dopaminergic drugs, clonazepam, and GABAergic drugs. The frequencies of genotypes and allelic variants were not associated with the risk for RLS and were not influenced by gender, age, and positive family history of RLS. We identified weak statistical associations of the SNP rs1799983 with the response to dopamine agonists (Pc = 0.018 for the rs1799983 G/T genotype) and of the SNP rs79467411 with the response to clonazepam (Pc = 0.018 for the rs79467411 G allele), although these findings should be cautiously interpreted and require further confirmation. These associations aside, our findings suggest that common NOS3 SNPs are not associated with the risk for idiopathic RLS in Caucasian Spanish people.
Introduction
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) or Willis-Ekbom disease (WED) is a high prevalence neurological disorder () mainly characterized by sensorimotor symptoms, with well-established diagnostic criteria (). Despite the causative genes of RLS have not been definitively identified, initial Genomic Wide Association Studies (GWAS) identified six susceptibility genes, and a further meta-analysis of GWAS identified 13 new susceptibility loci and confirmed these associations (; ). These 19 susceptibility loci should explain 11.7% of RLS heritability (). Results of several case-control association studies on candidate genes, which need further replication, have suggested a possible contribution in modifying the risk for RLS of vitamin D3 receptor (VDR) rs731236 (; ), heme-oxygenase (HMOX1) rs2071746 (; ), allele 2 of the complex microsatellite repeat Rep1 within the alpha-synuclein (SNCA) gene promoter (), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor rho3 (GABRR3) rs832032 (), and alcohol-dehydrogenase 1B (ADH1B) rs1229984 (). A weak association between RLS risk and the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS or NOS1) rs7977109 variant was described in a three-stage association study in Germans (), but this association was not found in a replication study involving Spanish Caucasian population ().
The neurochemical features of RLS are neither well known. Together with dopaminergic dysfunction and iron deficiency as the most consistent hypothesis, and the possible contribution of glutamatergic, GABAergic, and adenosinergic neurotransmission among others (
), several preliminary findings suggested a possible of nitric oxide (NO) and oxidative stress in the RLS pathophysiology:
A) Increased expression of NOS1 in the substantia nigra of patients diagnosed with idiopathic RLS was found in an immunohistochemical study ().
B) Decreased serum levels of nitrites (markers of NO) associated with increased plasma levels of advanced oxidation protein products and serum levels of the marker of lipid peroxidation malonaldehyde (MDA), and decreased serum levels of the antioxidant molecule thiol, in 22 patients with idiopathic RLS compared with 20 controls ().
C) Increased NOS expression in the spinal cord (thoracic intermediolateral nucleus) in DRD3 knock-out mice, compared with wild-type mice ().
Biological functions of NO include the maintaining of the arterial vasodilatory tone, the inhibition of platelet aggregation, antitumor and antimicrobial activities, mediation of macrophage cytotoxicity, and actions on neurotransmission processes (). NO, depending on its redox form, can have neuroprotective effects through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamatergic receptor blockade, or act as a reactive free radical (). NO is synthesized from L-arginine by the action of the three isoforms of NOS: neuronal NOS (nNOS or NOS1), inducible NOS (iNOS or NOS2), and endothelial NOS (eNOS or NOS3). The protein eNOS is encoded by the NOS3 or eNOS gene (chromosome 7q36.1; Gene Identity 4846, MIM 163729) (Link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/4846).
Several studies have described a possible role of vascular factors in the pathophysiology of RLS, mainly increased arterial stiffness (), impaired cerebral and peripheral vascular endothelial dysfunction (; ), and increased capillary network in the skeletal muscle (; ), the later related with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (). In contrast, recent studies have shown decreased serum levels of endocan (a marker of endothelial dysfunction) (), and lectin-like oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-1 (LOX-1, a proatherogenic substance that is expressed in endothelial cells under proatherogenic conditions) () in patients diagnosed with iRLS compared with control groups, suggesting that iRLS patients show decreased risk for atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction.
Because decreased NOS3 expression is related to endothelial dysfunction (; ), we investigated the possible association between the rs2070744, rs 1799983, and rs79467411 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the NOS3 gene and the risk for RLS in Caucasian Spanish people. As a secondary analysis, we studied the possible influence of these SNPs in age at onset and severity of RLS, gender, positive family history of RLS, and the response of RLS symptoms to several treatments.
Patients and Methods
Patients and Controls
This study involved 273 patients diagnosed with idiopathic RLS according to the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) diagnostic criteria (), after exclusion of secondary causes as was described elsewhere (), and 325 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical data of both groups. RLS patients were recruited from the Movement Disorders Unit of 4 hospitals, and healthy controls (none of them have personal or familial history of RLS, tremor, or other movement disorders) were staff or students from the University of Extremadura. Sixty percent of RLS patients were involved in other case-control genetic association studies published by our group (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ).
TABLE 1
| Group | RLS patients (n = 273) | Healthy controls (n = 325) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years): Mean (SD); range | 55.9 (14.9); 21–94 | 51.7 (16.4); 19–96 |
| Age at onset (years): Mean (SD); range | 43.6 (17.9); 5–82 | NA |
| Age at onset <15 years: N (%); range | 157 (55.5); 2–15 | NA |
| Female N (%) | 208 (76.2) | 247 (76.0) |
| Positive family history: N (%) | 181 (66.3) | NA |
| IRLSSG scale score, mean (SD) | 24.7 (8.1) | NA |
Demographic and clinical data of the series studied.
Genotyping of NOS3 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Genomic DNA, obtained from venous blood samples of participants in the study, was used for genotyping, which was performed by using pre-designed specific TaqMan probes for the SNPs rs1799983 (Asp298Glu; C___3219460_20), rs79467411 (Cys602Tyr; C_100840566_10) and the intronic rs2070744 SNP (C__15903863_10), all by Life Technologies, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain). All the SNPs were analyzed by triplicate in a QuantStudio 3 thermocycler (Life Technologies, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain). Full details of the genotyping procedure, which was identical for all SNPs, are described elsewhere (). The promoter rs2070744 SNP was included in the study because it has several clinical associations and it is related to increased mRNA expression () The two missense NOS3 SNPs were selected according to their allele frequencies in public databases such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), because both displayed minor allele frequencies higher than, or around, 10%, which is adequate to reach a high statistical power.
Statistical Analysis
The SPSS 15.0 version for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States) was used to perform statistical analysis. Confirmation of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, both in RLS patients and controls, was done with the online program https://ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl. Intergroup comparison values (both between the whole series of RLS patients and controls, between RLS patients and controls considering each gender separately and between RLS patients depending on the presence or absence of a family history of RLS or the response of RLS symptoms to the therapy) were done using the chi-square test (or the Fisher’s exact test where appropriate). The 95% CIs and the negative predictive values were also calculated (). False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction was used for multiple comparison adjustments ().
Determination of the sample size was done from the allele frequencies observed for healthy individuals by using a genetic model analyzing the minor allele frequency with an odds ratio (OR) value = 1.5 (α = 0.05). According to the sample size of this study, the statistical power (two-tailed association) for variant alleles, was as follows: rs2070744 = 93.7%, rs1799983 = 93.1%, and rs79467411 = 86.5%.
The comparisons of mean age at onset of RLS symptoms and severity of RLS symptoms according to the IRLSSG scale () between genotypes were done by using a t-test for independent samples.
Results
Hardy-Weinberg’s equilibrium for all genotypes and allelic variants frequencies was present both in RLS and healthy control groups. The frequencies of genotypes and allelic variants did not differ significantly between RLS patients and controls, neither in the whole series (Table 2), or analyzing men and females separately (Table 3), and were not influenced by the positivity of family history of RLS (Table 4). With regard to drug response, we analyzed the genotypes stratifying patients according to their response to dopaminergic drugs, clonazepam, and GABAergic drugs (Table 5). We identified a statistically significant increased frequency of patients with the rs1799983 (G/T) genotype in patients not responding to dopamine agonists (DAs), as compared with patients who responded to these drugs (p = 0.002). The statistical significance remained after FDR correction (Pc = 0.018). However, this association is likely to be due to chance, since the subgroup of patients not responding to DAs is small, and no increased frequency of homozygous rs1799983 (G/G) patients was observed among patients not responding to DAs. Also, we identified a low frequency of patients not responding to clonazepam and carrying the rs79467411 (G/G) genotype (p = 0.007), although such statistical significance became marginal after FDR correction (Pc = 0.063). The rs79467411 allele frequencies were also different among patients responding or not responding to clonazepam (p = 0.006; Table 5). After FRD adjustment the p-value remained significant (Pc = 0.018). These findings, however, should be interpreted cautiously since the number of patients not responding to clonazepam was very small (n = 16). Age at onset of RLS (Table 6), and RLS severity (Table 7), did not differ significantly between the different genotypes in RLS patients.
TABLE 2
| RLS patients (N = 273, 546 alleles) | Controls (N = 325, 650 alleles) | Intergroup comparison Or (95% CI), p; NPV (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypes | |||
| rs1799983 (T/T) | 36 (13.2; 9.2–17.2) | 47 (14.5; 10.6–18.3) | 0.90 (0.56–1.43); 0.654; 0.54 (0.52–0.56) |
| rs1799983 (G/T) | 128 (46.9; 41.0–52.8) | 149 (45.8; 40.4–51.3) | 1.04 (0.76–1.44); 0.800; 0.55 (0.51–0.59) |
| rs1799983 (G/G) | 109 (39.9; 34.1–45.7) | 129 (39.7; 34.4–45.0) | 1.01 (0.73–1.40); 0.954; 0.54 (0.51–0.58) |
| rs79467411 (G/G) | 160 (58.6; 52.8–64.5) | 190 (58.5; 53.1–63.8) | 1.01 (0.73–1.40), 0.971; 0.54 (0.50–0.59) |
| rs79467411 (G/A) | 100 (36.6; 30.9–42.3) | 124 (38.2; 32.9–43.4) | 0.94 (0.67–1.31); 0.702; 0.54 (0.51–0.57) |
| rs79467411 (A/A) | 13 (4.8; 2.2–7.3) | 11 (3.4; 1.4–5.4) | 1.43 (0.63–3.24); 0.393; 0.55 (0.54–0.56) |
| rs2070744 (T/T) | 76 (27.8; 22.5–33.2) | 101 (31.1; 26.0–36.1) | 0.86 (0.60–1.22); 0.388; 0.53 (0.51–0.56) |
| rs2070744 (T/C) | 135 (49.5; 43.5–55.4) | 159 (48.9; 43.5–54.4) | 1.02 (0.74–1.41); 0.898; 0.55 (0.51–0.59) |
| rs2070744 (C/C) | 62 (22.7; 17.7–27.7) | 65 (20.0; 15.7–24.3) | 1.18 (0.79–1.74); 0.420; 0.55 (0.53–0.57) |
| Alleles | |||
| rs1799983 (T) | 200 (36.6; 32.6–40.7) | 243 (37.4; 33.7–41.1) | 0.97 (0.77–1.23); 0.788; 0.54 (0.52–0.56) |
| rs1799983 (G) | 346 (63.4; 59.3–67.4) | 407 (62.6; 58.9–66.3) | 1.03 (0.82–1.31); 0.788; 0.55 (0.51–0.59) |
| rs79467411 (G) | 420 (76.9; 73.4–80.5) | 504 (77.5; 74.3–80.7) | 0.97 (0.74–1.27); 0.800; 0.54 (0.48–0.59) |
| rs79467411 (A) | 126 (23.1; 19.5–26.6) | 146 (22.5; 19.3–25.7) | 1.04 (0.79–1.36); 0.800; 0.55 (0.53–0.56) |
| rs2070744 (T) | 287 (52.6; 48.4–56.8) | 361 (55.5; 51.7–59.4) | 0.89 (0.71–1.12); 0.304; 0.53 (0.50–0.56) |
| rs2070744 (C) | 259 (47.4; 43.2–51.6) | 289 (44.5; 40.6–48.3) | 1.13 (0.90–1.42); 0.304; 0.56 (0.53–0.58) |
NOS3 genotypes and allelic variants of patients with RLS and healthy volunteers.
The values in each cell represent: number (percentage; 95% CIs).
TABLE 3
| RLS women (N = 208, 416 alleles) | Control women (N = 247, 494 alleles) | Intergroup comparisoN values OR (95%CI) p | NPV (95%CI) | RLS men (N = 65, 130 alleles) | Control men (N = 78, 156 alleles) | Intergroup comparison values OR (95%CI) p | NPV (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypes | ||||||||
| rs1799983 (T/T) | 28 (13.5; 8.8–18.1) | 36 (14.6; 10.2–19.0) | 0.91 (0.54–1.55); 0.734 | 0.54 (0.52–0.56) | 8 (12.3; 4.3–20.3) | 11 (14.1; 6.4–21.8) | 0.86 (0.32–2.27); 0.754 | 0.54 (0.51–0.58) |
| rs1799983 (G/T) | 91 (43.8; 37.0–50.5) | 113 (45.7; 39.5–52.0) | 0.92 (0.64–1.34); 0.670 | 0.53 (0.49–0.58) | 37 (56.9; 44.9–69.0) | 36 (46.2; 35.1–57.2) | 1.54 (0.80–2.99); 0.201 | 0.60 (0.51–0.69) |
| rs1799983 (G/G) | 89 (42.8; 36.1–49.5) | 98 (39.7; 33.6–45.8) | 1.14 (0.78–1.65); 0.502 | 0.56 (0.52–0.60) | 20 (30.8; 19.5–42.0) | 31 (39.7; 28.9–50.6) | 0.67 (0.34–1.35); 0.266 | 0.51 (0.45–0.58) |
| rs79467411 (G/G) | 122 (58.7; 52.0–65.3) | 145 (58.7; 52.6–64.8) | 1.00 (0.69–1.45); 0.991 | 0.54 (0.49–0.60) | 38 (58.5; 46.5–70.4) | 45 (57.7; 46.7–68.7) | 1.03 (0.53–2.01); 0.926 | 0.55 (0.45–0.65) |
| rs79467411 (G/A) | 74 (35.6; 29.1–42.1) | 94 (38.1; 32.0–44.1) | 0.90 (0.61–1.32); 0.585 | 0.53 (0.50–0.57) | 26 (40.0; 28.1–51.9) | 30 (38.5; 27.7–49.3) | 1.07 (0.54–2.09); 0.852 | 0.55 (0.48–0.62) |
| rs79467411 (A/A) | 12 (5.8; 2.6–8.9) | 8 (3.2; 1.0–5.4) | 1.83 (0.73–4.56); 0.190 | 0.55 (0.54–0.56) | 1 (1.5; –1.5–4.5) | 3 (3.8; –0.4–8.1) | 0.39 (0.04–3.85); 0.406 | 0.54 (0.53–0.56) |
| rs2070744 (T/T) | 60 (28.8; 22.7–35.0) | 77 (31.2; 25.4–37.0) | 0.90 (0.60–1.34); 0.590 | 0.54 (0.50–0.57) | 16 (24.6; 14.1–35.1) | 24 (30.8; 20.5–41.0) | 0.74 (0.35–1.54); 0.416 | 0.52 (0.47–0.58) |
| rs2070744 (T/C) | 105 (50.5; 43.7–57.3) | 121 (49.0; 42.8–55.2) | 1.06 (0.73–1.54); 0.751 | 0.55 (0.50–0.60) | 30 (46.2; 34.0–58.3) | 38 (48.7; 37.6–59.8) | 0.90 (0.47–1.75); 0.761 | 0.53 (0.45–0.62) |
| rs2070744 (C/C) | 43 (20.7; 15.2–26.2) | 49 (19.8; 14.9–24.8) | 1.05 (0.67–1.67); 0.825 | 0.55 (0.52–0.57) | 19 (29.2; 18.2–40.3) | 16 (20.5; 11.6–29.5) | 1.60 (0.74–3.45); 0.229 | 0.57 (0.52–0.62) |
| Alleles | ||||||||
| rs1799983 (T) | 147 (35.3; 30.7–39.9) | 185 (37.4; 33.2–41.7) | 0.90 (0.70–1.20); 0.510 | 0.54 (0.51–0.56) | 53 (40.8; 32.3–49.2) | 58 (37.2; 29.6–44.8) | 1.16 (0.72–1.87); 0.536 | 0.56 (0.51–0.61) |
| rs1799983 (G) | 269 (64.7; 60.1–69.3) | 309 (62.6; 58.3–66.8) | 1.10 (0.84–1.44); 0.510 | 0.56 (0.51–0.60) | 77 (59.2; 50.8–67.7) | 98 (62.8; 55.2–70.4) | 0.86 (0.53–1.39); 0.536 | 0.52 (0.45–0.60) |
| rs79467411 (G) | 318 (76.4; 72.4–80.5) | 384 (77.7; 74.1–81.4) | 0.93 (0.68–1.27); 0.644 | 0.53 (0.47–0.59) | 102 (78.5; 71.4–85.5) | 120 (76.9; 70.3–83.5) | 1.09 (0.62–1.91); 0.756 | 0.56 (0.45–0.67) |
| rs79467411 (A) | 98 (23.6; 19.5–27.6) | 110 (22.3; 18.6–25.9) | 1.08 (0.79–1.47); 0.644 | 0.55 (0.53–0.67) | 28 (21.5; 14.5–28.6) | 36 (23.1; 16.5–29.7) | 0.92 (0.52–1.60); 0.756 | 0.54 (0.51–0.57) |
| rs2070744 (T) | 225 (54.1; 49.3–58.9) | 275 (55.7; 51.3–60.0) | 0.94 (0.72–1.22); 0.633 | 0.53 (0.50–0.57) | 62 (47.7; 39.1–56.3) | 86 (55.1; 47.3–62.9) | 0.74 (0.47–1.18); 0.211 | 0.51 (0.45–0.57) |
| rs2070744 (C) | 191 (45.9; 41.1–50.7) | 219 (44.3; 40.0–48.7) | 1.07 (0.82–1.39); 0.633 | 0.55 (0.52–0.58) | 68 (52.3; 43.7–60.9) | 70 (44.9; 37.1–52.7) | 1.35 (0.85–2.15); 0.211 | 0.58 (0.52–0.64) |
NOS3 genotypes and allelic variants of patients with RLS and healthy volunteers distributed by gender.
The values in each cell represent: number (percentage; 95% CIs).
TABLE 4
| Genotype | Positive family history of RLS (N = 181, 362 alleles) | Negative family history of RLS (N = 92, 184 alleles) | Intergroup comparison values OR (95% CI) p; NPV OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypes | |||
| rs1799983 (T/T) | 23 (12.7; 7.9–17.6) | 13 (14.1; 7.0–21.2) | 0.89 (0.43–1.84); 0.743; 0.33 (0.31–0.36) |
| rs1799983 (G/T) | 88 (48.6; 41.3–55.9) | 40 (43.5; 33.3–53.6) | 1.23 (0.74–2.04); 0.422; 0.36 (0.30–0.41) |
| rs1799983 (G/G) | 70 (38.7; 31.6–45.8) | 39 (42.4; 32.3–52.5) | 0.86 (0.51–1.43); 0.554; 0.32 (0.27–0.37) |
| rs79467411 (G/G) | 106 (58.6; 51.4–65.7) | 54 (58.7; 48.6–68.8) | 1.00 (0.60–1.66); 0.983; 0.34 (0.27–0.41) |
| rs79467411 (G/A) | 66 (36.5; 29.5–43.5) | 34 (37.0; 27.1–46.8) | 0.98 (0.58–1.65); 0.936; 0.34 (0.29–0.38) |
| rs79467411 (A/A) | 9 (5.0; 1.8–8.1) | 4 (4.3; 0.2–8.5) | 1.15 (0.35–3.84); 0.819; 0.34 (0.32–0.35) |
| rs2070744 (T/T) | 53 (29.3; 22.7–35.9) | 23 (25.0; 16.2–33.8) | 1.24 (0.70–2.20); 0.456; 0.35 (0.31–0.38) |
| rs2070744 (T/C) | 92 (50.8; 43.5–58.1) | 43 (46.7; 36.5–56.9) | 1.18 (0.71–1.95); 0.524; 0.36 (0.30–0.41) |
| rs2070744 (C/C) | 36 (19.9; 14.1–25.7) | 26 (28.3; 19.1–37.5) | 0.63 (0.35–1.13); 0.119; 0.31 (0.28–0.35) |
| Alleles | |||
| rs1799983 (T) | 134 (37.0; 32.0–42.0) | 66 (35.9; 28.9–42.8) | 1.05 (0.73–1.52); 0.793; 0.34 (0.31–0.37) |
| rs1799983 (G) | 228 (63.0; 58.0–68.0) | 118 (64.1; 57.2–71.1) | 0.95 (0.66–1.38); 0.793; 0.33 (0.28–0.39) |
| rs79467411 (G) | 278 (76.8; 72.4–81.1) | 142 (77.2; 71.1–83.2) | 0.98 (0.64–1.49); 0.921; 0.33 (0.26–0.41) |
| rs79467411 (A) | 84 (23.2; 18.9–27.6) | 42 (22.8; 16.8–28.9) | 1.02 (0.67–1.56); 0.921; 0.34 (0.32–0.36) |
| rs2070744 (T) | 198 (54.7; 49.6–59.8) | 89 (48.4; 41.1–55.6) | 1.29 (0.90–1.84); 0.162; 0.38 (0.32–0.41) |
| rs2070744 (C) | 164 (45.3; 40.2–50.4) | 95 (51.6; 44.4–58.9) | 0.78 (0.54–1.12); 0.162; 0.31 (0.27–0.35) |
NOS3 genotypes and allelic variants of patients with RLS distributed by family history.
The values in each cell represent number (percentage; 95% CIs). Crude p values are shown. NPV: negative predictive value.
TABLE 5
| Positive response to dopamine agonists (N = 211, 422 alleles) | Negative response to dopamine agonists (N = 18, 36 alleles) | Intergroup comparison values OR (95%CI) p | Positive Response CNZ (N = 88, 176 alleles) | Negative Response CNZ (N = 16, 32 alleles) | Intergroup comparison values OR (95%CI) p | Positive response GABA (N = 50, 100 alleles) | Negative response GABA (N = 11, 22 alleles) | Intergroup comparison values OR (95%CI) p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypes | |||||||||
| rs1799983 (T/T) | 29 (13.7; 9.1–18.4) | 1 (5.6; −5.0–16.1) | 2.71 (0.35–21.14); 0.324 | 13 (14.8; 7.4–22.2) | 0 (0.0; 0.0–0.0) | 1.21<u>a</u> (0.87–1.21); 0.102 | 6 (12.0; 3.0–21.0) | 1 (9.1; −7.9–26.1) | 1.36 (0.15–12.63); 0.786 |
| rs1799983 (G/T) | 95 (45.0; 38.3–51.7) | 14 (83.3; 66.1–100.6) | 0.16 (0.05–0.58); 0.002 | 39 (44.3; 33.9–54.7) | 8 (50.0; 25.5–74.5) | 0.80 (0.27–2.31); 0.676 | 24 (48.0; 34.2–61.8) | 7 (63.6; 35.2–92.1) | 0.53 (0.14–2.03); 0.352 |
| rs1799983 (G/G) | 87 (41.2; 34.6–47.9) | 2 (11.1; −3.4–25.6) | 5.26 (1.17–23.60); 0.017 | 36 (40.9; 30.6–51.2) | 8 (50.0; 25.5–74.5) | 0.67 (0.24–2.02); 0.500 | 20 (40.0; 26.4–53.6) | 3 (27.3; 1.0–53.6) | 1.78 (0.42–7.52); 0.434 |
| rs79467411 (G/G) | 121 (57.3; 50.7–64.0) | 10 (55.6; 32.6–78.5) | 1.08 (0.41–2.83); 0.883 | 59 (67.0; 57.2–76.9) | 5 (31.3; 8.5–54.0) | 4.47 (1.42–14.1); 0.007 | 33 (66.0; 52.9–79.1) | 7 (63.6; 35.2–92.1) | 1.12 (0.28–4.33); 0.882 |
| rs79467411 (G/A) | 80 (37.9; 31.4–44.5) | 6 (33.3; 11.6–55.1) | 1.22 (0.44–3.38); 0.701 | 29 (33.0; 23.1–42.8) | 10 (62.5; 38.8–86.2) | 0.30 (0.10–0.89); 0.025 | 15 (30.0; 17.3–42.7) | 4 (36.4; 7.9–64.8) | 0.75 (0.19–2.95); 0.682 |
| rs79467411 (A/A) | 10 (4.7; 1.9–7.6) | 2 (11.1; −3.4–25.6) | 0.40 (0.08–1.97); 0.245 | 0 (0.0; 0.0–0.0) | 1 (6.3; −5.6–18.1) | 0.00<u>a</u> (0.00–1.12); 0.019 | 2 (4.0; −1.4–9.4) | 0 (0.0; 0.0–0.0) | 1.23<u>a</u> (0.24–1.23); 0.504 |
| rs2070744 (T/T) | 57 (27.0; 21.0–33.0) | 4 (22.2; 3.0–41.4) | 1.30 (0.41–4.10); 0.660 | 28 (31.8; 22.1–41.5) | 7 (43.8; 19.4–68.1) | 0.60 (0.20–1.78); 0.355 | 14 (28.0; 15.6–40.4) | 1 (9.1; −7.9–26.1) | 3.89 (0.46–33.26); 0.191 |
| rs2070744 (T/C) | 100 (47.4; 40.7–54.1) | 12 (66.7; 44.9–88.4) | 0.45 (0.16–1.25); 0.117 | 40 (45.5; 35.1–55.9) | 7 (43.8; 19.4–68.1) | 1.07 (0.37–3.31); 0.900 | 27 (54.0; 40.2–67.8) | 6 (54.5; 25.1–84.0) | 0.99 (0.26–3.63); 0.974 |
| rs2070744 (C/C) | 54 (25.6; 19.7–31.5) | 2 (11.1; −3.4–25.6) | 2.57 (0.61–12.36); 0.171 | 20 (22.7; 14.0–31.5) | 2 (12.5; −3.7–28.7) | 2.06 (0.43–9.83); 0.359 | 9 (18.0; 7.4–28.6) | 4 (36.4; 7.9–64.8) | 0.39 (0.09–1.60); 0.182 |
| Alleles | |||||||||
| rs1799983 (T) | 153 (36.3; 31.7–40.8) | 17 (47.2; 30.9–63.5) | 0.64 (0.321.26); 0.192 | 65 (36.9; 29.8–44.1) | 8 (25.0; 10.0–40.0) | 1.76 (0.75–4.14); 0.194 | 36 (36.0; 26.6–45.4) | 9 (40.9; 20.4–61.5) | 0.81 (0.32–2.09); 0.667 |
| rs1799983 (G) | 269 (63.7; 59.2–68.3) | 19 (52.8; 36.5–69.1) | 1.57 (0.79–3.12); 0.192 | 111 (63.1; 55.9–70.2) | 24 (75.0; 60.0–90.0) | 0.57 (0.24–1.34); 0.194 | 64 (64.0; 54.6–73.4) | 13 (59.1; 38.5–79.6) | 1.23 (0.48–3.16); 0.667 |
| rs79467411 (G) | 322 (76.3; 72.2–80.4) | 26 (72.2; 57.6–86.9) | 1.24 (0.58–2.66); 0.583 | 147 (83.5; 78.0–89.0) | 20 (62.5; 45.7–79.3) | 3.04 (1.34–6.90); 0.006 | 81 (81.0; 73.3–88.7) | 18 (81.8; 65.7–97.9) | 0.95 (0.29–3.12); 0.930 |
| rs79467411 (A) | 100 (23.7; 19.6–27.8) | 10 (27.8; 13.1–42.4) | 0.81 (0.38–1.73); 0.583 | 29 (16.5; 11.0–22.0) | 12 (37.5; 20.7–54.3) | 0.33 (0.15–0.75); 0.006 | 19 (19.0; 11.3–26.7) | 4 (18.2; 2.1–34.3) | 1.06 (0.32–3.48); 0.930 |
| rs2070744 (T) | 214 (50.7; 45.9–55.5) | 20 (55.6; 39.3–71.8) | 0.82 (0.42–1.63); 0.577 | 96 (54.5; 47.2–61.9) | 21 (65.6; 49.2–82.1) | 0.63 (0.29–1.38); 0.246 | 55 (55.0; 45.2–64.8) | 8 (36.4; 16.3–56.5) | 2.14 (0.82–5.55); 0.115 |
| rs2070744 (C) | 208 (49.3; 44.5–54.1) | 16 (44.4; 28.2–60.7) | 1.22 (0.61–2.41); 0.577 | 80 (45.5; 38.1–52.8) | 11 (34.4; 17.9–50.8) | 1.59 (0.72–3.50), 0.246 | 45 (45.0; 35.2–54.8) | 14 (63.6; 43.5–83.7) | 0.47 (0.18–1.21); 0.115 |
NOS3 genotypes and allelic variants of patients with RLS distributed by response to dopamine agonists, clonazepam, and GABAergic drugs.
The values in each cell represent number (percentage; 95% CIs).
The Relative risk is shown instead of the Odds Ratio, because one of the values is equal to 0.
TABLE 6
| Age at onset (years) | Two tailed t-Test compared to non-mutated | Two tailed t-Test compared to heterozygous | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rs1799983 (T/T) | 45.6 ± 15.8 | ||
| rs1799983 (G/T) | 43.7 ± 18.3 | 0.572 | |
| rs1799983 (G/G) | 43.0 ± 17.8 | 0.439 | 0.773 |
| rs79467411 (G/G) | 43.1 ± 17.4 | ||
| rs79467411 (G/A) | 44.1 ± 18.1 | 0.666 | |
| rs79467411 (A/A) | 47.2 ± 19.7 | 0.412 | 0.557 |
| rs2070744 (T/T) | 45.9 ± 16.5 | ||
| rs2070744 (T/C) | 42.7 ± 17.8 | 0.206 | |
| rs2070744 (C/C) | 42.9 ± 18.9 | 0.335 | 0.931 |
Age at onset of RLS according the NOS3 genotypes.
TABLE 7
| Irlssgrs | Two tailed t-Test compared to non-mutated | Two tailed t-Test compared to heterozygous | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rs1799983 (T/T) | 23.0 ± 4.8 | ||
| rs1799983 (G/T) | 24.5 ± 7.0 | 0.230 | |
| rs1799983 (G/G) | 25.0 ± 6.8 | 0.120 | 0.633 |
| rs79467411 (G/G) | 25.0 ± 6.2 | ||
| rs79467411 (G/A) | 24.1 ± 6.5 | 0.265 | |
| rs79467411 (A/A) | 25.6 ± 6.9 | 0.746 | 0.459 |
| rs2070744 (T/T) | 23.7 ± 6.7 | ||
| rs2070744 (T/C) | 24.8 ± 7.0 | 0.240 | |
| rs2070744 (C/C) | 24.9 ± 6.0 | 0.275 | 0.959 |
IRLSSGRS according to NOS3 genotypes.
Discussion
The possible role of NOS3 variants on the risk for neurological diseases has been the matter of several recent reports. In this regard, it has been reported an increased risk for delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage () and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (). One study in the Iranian population showed an association between NOS3 rs2070744 and multiple sclerosis (), but this association was not replicated in other populations (; ). It has been described increased risk for stroke in a population-based study in the United States (), but this association was not replicated by a case-control association study in Turkey (). A meta-analysis showed an association between NOS3 rs2070744CC genotype and the risk for migraine in Caucasians (), but a replication study in the Caucasian Spanish population did not confirm this finding ().
Despite the possibility that NO could play a in the pathogenesis of RLS suggested by several previous mentioned studies (; ; ), the possible contribution of polymorphisms in the NOS genes to the risk of developing RLS has not been established. While a previously mentioned NOS1 variant was associated with RLS risk in a study (), this was not confirmed in another one ().
In the present study, involving Caucasian Spanish people, we analyzed three common NOS3 SNPs: the promoter SNP rs270744, which alters mRNA expression (), as well as two common nonsynonymous SNPs: rs1799983 that induces the amino acid exchange Asp298Glu, and has clinical implications (), and rs79467411 that induces the amino acid exchange Cys602Tyr. Other NOS3 functional SNPs, such as rs143125350 (Arg613Gly) or rs3918166 (Arg112Gln) show extremely low minor allele frequencies (0.000 and 0.002, respectively) in Southern European subjects according to public databases (gnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) and therefore were not included in the analyses. The 27-bp VNTR 4a/4b NOS3 gene variation () was not analyzed because of DNA shortage. However, it should be taken into consideration that the functional effect of the 27-bp VNTR has been determined in a very small number of individuals and quantitatively is relatively small ().
We did not identify any major association between common NOS3 SNPs with the risk for RLS. Moreover, these NOS3 variants were not related to the age at onset or with the severity of RLS assessed by the IRLSSG scale scores (), or family history or RLS. Regarding the response to drugs usually used for the treatment of RLS, we identified weak associations that should be interpreted cautiously, and require further confirmation.
The main limitation of the present study is the relatively low sample size of the two analyzed cohorts (RLS patients and controls). While the sample size of our cohorts should be adequate to detect ORs of 1.5, it is likely that it could not be sufficient to detect more modest associations. However, taking into account this limitation, the results of this study suggest that common NOS3 SNPs are unrelated to the risk for RLS in the Caucasian Spanish people. These results do not preclude the possibility that other SNPs in the NOS3 gene could be associated with the modification of the risk of developing this disease.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: All data related to the current study, intended for reasonable use, is available from JA (University Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, University of Extremadura -UNEx ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Av/ de la Universidad S/N, E10071 Cáceres. Spain) and FJJ-J (Section of Neurology, Hospital del Sureste, Arganda del Rey, Madrid, Spain). Requests to access these datasets should be directed to jagundez@unex.es; fjavier.jimenez@salud.madrid.org.
Ethics statement
We applied the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obligatory to participate in the study, which was approved by the Ethics Committees of Hospital La Mancha-Centro (Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain), University Hospital “Infanta Cristina” (Badajoz, Spain), and University Hospital “Príncipe de Asturias” (Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
FJJ-J: Drafting/revising the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; study concept or design; acquisition of data; analysis or interpretation of data; study supervision and coordination. BGA, JG-T, LT-F, JM-P, MD-F, IA, MC, RG-R, SN-M, MR-B, JFP-N, and EG-A: Drafting/revising the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; acquisition of data. HA-N: Drafting/revising the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; study concept or design; acquisition of data; interpretation of data; study supervision and coordination. PP: Drafting/revising the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; study concept or design; acquisition of data; interpretation of data; study supervision and coordination. EG-M: Drafting/revising the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; study concept or design; acquisition of data; interpretation of data; study supervision and coordination, and obtaining funding. JAGA: Drafting/revising the manuscript for content, including medical writing for content; study concept or design; acquisition of data; statistical analysis and interpretation of data; study supervision and coordination, and obtaining funding.
Funding
This work was supported in part by Grants RETICS RD16/0006/0004 (ARADyAL), PI15/00303, and PI18/00540 from Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain and GR18145 and IB16170 from Junta de Extremadura, Mérida, Spain. Partially funded with FEDER funds.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AgúndezJ. A. G.García-MartínE.RodríguezC.Benito-LeónJ.Millán-PascualJ.Díaz-SánchezM.et al (2020). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) rs2070744 polymorphism and risk for multiple sclerosis. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna). 127, 1167–1175. 10.1007/s00702-020-02211-0
2
AlFadhliS.MohammedE. M.Al ShubailiA. (2013). Association analysis of nitric oxide synthases: NOS1, NOS2A and NOS3 genes, with multiple sclerosis. Ann. Hum. Biol.40, 368–375. 10.3109/03014460.2013.786756
3
AllenR. P.PicchiettiD. L.Garcia-BorregueroD.OndoW. G.WaltersA. S.WinkelmanJ. W.et al (2014). Restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease diagnostic criteria: updated international restless legs syndrome study group (IRLSSG) consensus criteria--history, rationale, description, and significance. Sleep Med.15, 860–873. 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.03.025
4
AltmanD. G.BlandJ. M. (1994). Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ309, 102. 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102
5
AnlıaçıkS. Ö.TokgözS.ZamaniA. G.YıldırımmM. S.İyisoyM. S. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between ischemic stroke and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms [G894T, intron 4 VNTR and T786C]. Turk J. Med. Sci.49, 589–594. 10.3906/sag-1808-57
6
BaskolG.KorkmazS.ErdemF.CanikliogluA.KocyigitM.AksuM. (2012). Assessment of nitric oxide, advanced oxidation protein products, malondialdehyde, and thiol levels in patients with restless legs syndrome. Sleep Med.13, 414–418. 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.11.012
7
BenjaminiY.DraiD.ElmerG.KafkafiN.GolaniI. (2001). Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav. Brain Res.125, 279–284. 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00297-2
8
CelikK.CikrikciogluM. A.HalacG.KilicE.AyhanS.OzarasN.et al (2015). Serum endocan levels in women with restless legs syndrome. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat11, 2919–2925. 10.2147/NDT.S92771
9
ClemensS.SawchukM. A.HochmanS. (2005). Reversal of the circadian expression of tyrosine-hydroxylase but not nitric oxide synthase levels in the spinal cord of dopamine D3 receptor knockout mice. Neuroscience133, 353–357. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.03.002
10
DongH.WangZ. H.DongB.HuY. N.ZhaoH. Y. (2018). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (-786T>C) polymorphism and migraine susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore)97: e12241. 10.1097/MD.0000000000012241
11
FanA. Z.FangJ.YesupriyaA.ChangM. H.KilmerG.HouseM.et al (2010). Gene polymorphisms in association with self-reported stroke in US adults. Appl. Clin. Genet.3, 23–28. 10.2147/tacg.s8574
12
García-MartínE.Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Alonso-NavarroH.MartínezC.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.et al (2015). Heme oxygenase-1 and 2 common genetic variants and risk for restless legs syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore)94: e1448. 10.1097/MD.0000000000001448
13
García MartínE.Navarro-MuñozS.RodríguezC.SerradorM.Alonso-NavarroH.CallejaM.et al (2020). Association between endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) rs2070744 and the risk for migraine. Pharmacogenomics J.20, 426–432. 10.1038/s41397-019-0133-x
14
HalacG.KilicE.CikrikciogluM. A.CelikK.Toprak-ErekA.KeskinS.et al (2016). Serum soluble lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 levels in patients with restless legs syndrome. Bratisl Lek Listy117, 316–320. 10.4149/bll_2016_063
15
HanS. H.ParkK. Y.KimJ. M.YounY. C.ShinH. W. (2019). Restless legs syndrome is associated with arterial stiffness and clinical outcome in stroke patients. Sleep Med.60, 219–223. 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.03.027
16
HeidariM. M.KhatamiM.TahamtanY. (2017). Molecular analysis of rs2070744 and rs1799983 polymorphisms of NOS3 gene in Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis. Basic Clin. Neurosci.8, 279–284. 10.18869/nirp.bcn.8.4.279
17
HendrixP.ForemanP. M.HarriganM. R.FisherW. S.3rdVyasN. A.LipskyR. H.et al (2017). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphism is associated with delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg.101, 514–519. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.062
18
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Alonso-NavarroH.García-MartínE.AgúndezJ. A. G. (2018a). Genetics of restless legs syndrome: an update. Sleep Med. Rev.39, 108–121. 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.08.002
19
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Alonso-NavarroH.García-MartínE.AgúndezJ. A. G. (2019). Neurochemical features of idiopathic restless legs syndrome. Sleep Med. Rev.45, 70–87. 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.03.006
20
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Alonso-NavarroH.MartínezC.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.MillánJ.et al (2013). Dopamine receptor D3 (DRD3) gene rs6280 variant and risk for restless legs syndrome. Sleep Med.14, 382–384. 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.11.009
21
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Alonso-NavarroH.MartínezC.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.Millán-PascualJ.et al (2015a). Neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, NOS1) rs693534 and rs7977109 variants and risk for restless legs syndrome. J. Neural Transm.122, 819–823. 10.1007/s00702-014-1322-z
22
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Alonso-NavarroH.MartínezC.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.Millán-PascualJ.et al (2014). The solute carrier family 1 (glial high affinity glutamate transporter), member 2 gene, SLC1A2, rs3794087 variant and assessment risk for restless legs syndrome. Sleep Med.15, 266–268. 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.08.800
23
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.EsguevillasG.Alonso-NavarroH.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.Millán-PascualJ.et al (2018b). Gamma-aminobutiric acid (GABA) receptors genes polymorphisms and risk for restless legs syndrome. Pharmacogenomics J.18, 555–567. 10.1038/s41397-018-0023-7
24
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Gómez-TabalesJ.Alonso-NavarroH.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.Millán-PascualJ.et al (2017b). Association between the rs1229984 polymorphism in the alcohol dehydrogenase 1B gene and risk for restless legs syndrome. Sleep40 (12). 10.1093/sleep/zsx174
25
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.García-MartínE.Alonso-NavarroH.MartínezC.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.et al (2015b). Association between vitamin D receptor rs731236 (Taq1) polymorphism and risk for restless legs syndrome in the Spanish Caucasian population. Medicine (Baltimore). 94: e2125. 10.1097/MD.0000000000002125
26
Jiménez-JiménezF. J.García-MartínE.Alonso-NavarroH.MartínezC.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.et al (2017a). Thr105Ile (rs11558538) polymorphism in the histamine-1-methyl- transferase (HNMT) gene and risk for restless legs syndrome. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna)124, 285–291. 10.1007/s00702-016-1645-z
27
KimM. S.ParkD. G.YoonJ. H. (2019). Impaired endothelial function may predict treatment response in restless legs syndrome. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna)126, 1051–1059. 10.1007/s00702-019-02031-x
28
Kittel-SchneiderS.ReußM.MeyerA.WeberH.GessnerA.LeistnerC.et al (2015). Multi-level biomarker analysis of nitric oxide synthase isoforms in bipolar disorder and adult ADHD. J. Psychopharmacol. (Oxford)29, 31–38. 10.1177/0269881114555251
29
KohS. Y.KimM. S.LeeS. M.HongJ. M.YoonJ. H. (2015). Impaired vascular endothelial function in patients with restless legs syndrome: a new aspect of the vascular pathophysiology. J. Neurol. Sci.359, 207–210. 10.1016/j.jns.2015.10.041
30
KooB. B. (2015). Restless leg syndrome across the globe: epidemiology of the restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease. Sleep Med. Clin.10, 189–205. 10.1016/j.jsmc.2015.05.004
31
LarssonB. W.KadiF.UlfbergJ.AulinK. P. (2007). Skeletal muscle morphology in patients with restless legs syndrome. Eur. Neurol.58, 133–137. 10.1159/000104712
32
MalikR.RannikmäeK.TraylorM.GeorgakisM. K.SargurupremrajM.MarkusH. S.et al (2018).Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 3 novel loci associated with stroke. Ann. Neurol.84, 934–939. 10.1002/ana.25369
33
MolinaJ. A.Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Ortí-ParejaM.NavarroJ. A., (1998). The role of nitric oxide in neurodegeneration. Potential for pharmacological intervention. Drugs Aging12, 251–259. 10.2165/00002512-199812040-00001
34
NapoliC.de NigrisF.Williams-IgnarroS.PignalosaO.SicaV.IgnarroL. J. (2006). Nitric oxide and atherosclerosis: an update. Nitric Oxide15, 265–279. 10.1016/j.niox.2006.03.011
35
NapoliC.IgnarroL. J., (2001). Nitric oxide and atherosclerosis. Nitric Oxide5, 88–97. 10.1006/niox.2001.0337
36
PattonS. M.PonnuruP.SnyderA. M.PodskalnyG. D.ConnorJ. R. (2011). Hypoxia-inducible factor pathway activation in restless legs syndrome patients. Eur. J. Neurol.18, 1329–1335. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03397.x
37
RocoA.Jiménez-JiménezF. J.Alonso-NavarroH.MartínezC.ZurdoM.Turpín-FenollL.et al (2013). MAPT1 gene rs1052553 variant is unrelated with the risk for restless legs syndrome. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna)120, 463–467. 10.1007/s00702-012-0897-5
38
SchormairB.ZhaoC.BellS.TilchE.SalminenA. V.PützB.et al (2017). Identification of novel risk loci for restless legs syndrome in genome-wide association studies in individuals of European ancestry: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol.16, 898–907. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30327-7
39
Wåhlin-LarssonB.UlfbergJ.AulinK. P.KadiF. (2009). The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in skeletal muscle of patients with sleep disorders. Muscle Nerve40, 556–561. 10.1002/mus.21357
40
WaltersA. S.LeBrocqC.DharA.HeningW.RosenR.AllenR. P.et al (2003). Validation of the International restless legs syndrome study group rating scale for restless legs syndrome. Sleep Med.4, 121–132. 10.1016/s1389-9457(02)00258-7
41
WinkelmannJ.LichtnerP.SchormairB.UhrM.HaukS.Stiasny-KolsterK.et al (2008). Variants in the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, NOS1) gene are associated with restless legs syndrome. Mov Disord.23, 350–358. 10.1002/mds.21647
42
WuY.ZhuZ.FangX.YinL.LiuY.XuS.et al (2016). The association between NOS3 gene polymorphisms and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy susceptibility and symptoms in Chinese han population. Biomed. Res. Int.2016, 1957374. 10.1155/2016/1957374
43
ZhangM. X.ZhangC.ShenY. H.WangJ.LiX. N.ZhangY.et al (2008). Biogenesis of short intronic repeat 27-nucleotide small RNA from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase gene. J. Biol. Chem.283, 14685–14693. 10.1074/jbc.M801933200
Summary
Keywords
restless legs syndrome, genetics, genetic polymorphisms, nitric oxide, nitric oxide synthase genes, risk factors
Citation
Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Agúndez BG, Gómez-Tabales J, Alonso-Navarro H, Turpín-Fenoll L, Millán-Pascual J, Díez-Fairén M, Álvarez I, Pastor P, Calleja M, García-Ruiz R, Navarro-Muñoz S, Recio-Bermejo M, Plaza-Nieto JF, García-Albea E, García-Martín E and Agúndez JAG (2021) Common Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms are not Related With the Risk for Restless Legs Syndrome. Front. Pharmacol. 12:618989. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.618989
Received
19 October 2020
Accepted
22 January 2021
Published
25 February 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Luis Abel Quiñones, University of Chile, Chile
Reviewed by
Melih O. Babaoglu, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Cesar Quiroz, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Jiménez-Jiménez, Agúndez, Gómez-Tabales, Alonso-Navarro, Turpín-Fenoll, Millán-Pascual, Díez-Fairén, Álvarez, Pastor, Calleja, García-Ruiz, Navarro-Muñoz, Recio-Bermejo, Plaza-Nieto, García-Albea, García-Martín and Agúndez.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Félix Javier Jiménez-Jiménez, fjavier.jimenez@salud.madrid.org
ORCID: ZmVsaXguamltZW5lekBzZW4uZXM= http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-7323
This article was submitted to Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.