Introduction
Elucidation of the human genome has increased understanding of human body responses to drug administration (Oprea et al., 2018; Nabirotchkin et al., 2020). Likewise, recent studies on human genetic diversity have shown that it is still necessary to delve into individual genetic differences, the adverse effects associated with drug metabolism, drug response variability with the diet, and even the human microbiome (Sharma et al., 2019). Access to biological samples in Latin America is essential to further understanding the presence of genes that may be associated with adverse effects and pharmacological interactions due to their diversity of populations and in anticipating the effects of new treatments.
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reinforced the urgent need to study the genetic differences among people with mild symptoms and those with complex responses to the disease (Ovsyannikova et al., 2020). During the pandemic, different drugs have been studied in the search for therapeutic alternatives to combat it, mainly due to the “Solidarity Trial” and “Repurposing Drugs” initiatives of the World Health Organization (OMS) (). Similarly, new drugs for actual and future diseases can be designed by using pharmacogenetic information. As an example, due to the diversity of therapeutic action mechanisms of a drug, it is necessary to in parallel study human cell susceptibility to the entry of SARS-CoV-2 in genetic world populations. Pharmacogenetics studies of their allele variants are essential. This approach is imperative in enabling national health systems to make informed decisions about the therapeutic strategies used, especially in countries with multiple ethnic groups.
Examples that illustrate the importance of understanding therapeutic effectiveness responses in target groups include the premature administration of hydroxychloroquine based on affect glycosylation of angiotensin converting enzyme-2, without information on genetic variability () and remdesivir administration (). Research on ethnic group pharmacogenetics in Latin America is still scarce (Sosa-Macías et al., 2016; Leitão et al., 2020), but there is evidence of pharmacogenetic differences (Suarez-Kurtz and Parra, 2018). For example, Mestizo populations are not considered a unique group for these types of studies, since miscegenation varies in each Latin American country ().The COVID-19 pandemic has shown us that data and access to pharmacogenetic information are required for making clinical decisions in a prioritized and sometimes urgent ways.
The reservoirs of genetic material in biobanks in the United Kingdom (McInnes and Altman, 2020) and even in Africa (Matimba et al., 2008), allow researchers to quickly access information on the allelic distributions of important pharmacogenetic markers. However, in Latin America, biobanks for pharmacogenetic research purposes have had only slight development. The bioethical and legal aspects must be considered, and access to biomedical sample information is necessary in a region with high ethnical diversity and little-studied ancestral Amerindian populations.
Biobanks
Biobanks can hold genetic data for a significant percentage of an entire population (Malsagova et al., 2020). In Estonia, e.g., genetic information on about 5% of the adult population can be found in a DNA bank (Reisberg et al., 2019). Additionally, biobanks contribute to reducing the cost of pharmacogenetic studies () avoiding the sampling of the population of interest in each study, also allowing a collaborative approach. In Europe, biobanks like one in Poland, have used different management models, preserving essential fundamental information for the benefit of public health (Sak et al., 2012). Moreover, biobanks are very useful for establishing pharmacogenetic relationships for research drug interactions with genes identified in a population (Muller et al., 2020; Rollinson et al., 2020).
Bioethics and Legal Aspects
There are ethical dilemmas involved with asking a donor to provide unique informed consent. This has, however, been improved with the development of the model of dynamic consent (Steinsbekk et al., 2013). Ethics committees play a key role in the ethical debates concerning approval of donations to biobanks and access to the stored genetic material (). A legal framework is also required for the use of biobank samples (). Recently, legal and ethical issues have focused on sample ownership and access, donor protection, and long-term storage of biological samples (Paskal et al., 2018; ).
Conclusion
Due to high population diversity, Latin America faces the challenge of addressing genetic variability in studies to improve pharmacological responses to therapeutics for diseases. The creation of biobanks, their strengthening, and collaboration among them, would be a fundamental contribution to obtain pharmacogenetic information and efficient therapeutic responses in Latin America.
Statements
Author contributions
RV and OC designed and drafted the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BeigelJ. H.TomashekK. M.DoddL. E.MehtaA. K.ZingmanB. S.KalilA. C.et al (2020). Remdesivir for the treatment of covid-19—final report. New Engl. J. Med.0 (0). 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
2
BottonM. R.CamposK. C.DucongeJ.ScottS. A. (2019). “Chapter 12-pharmacogenomics in Latin American populations,” in Pharmacogenomics. 2nd Edn, Editors LamE. Y. W. F.ScottS. A. (Academic Press), 329–368.
3
FaccaD.SmithM.ShelleyJ.LizotteD.DonelleL. (2020). Exploring the ethical issues in research using digital data collection strategies with minors: a scoping review. PLoS One15 (8), e0237875. 10.1371/journal.pone.0237875
4
FernerR. E.AronsonJ. K. (2020). Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in covid-19. BMJ369, m1432. 10.1136/bmj.m1432
5
HanssonM. G. (2009). Ethics and biobanks. Br. J. Cancer100 (1), 8–12. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604795
6
HarrisonCh. (2020). Coronavirus puts drug repurposing on the fast track. Nat. Biotechnol.38 (4), 379–391. 10.1038/d41587-020-00003-1
7
HelgessonG.DillnerJ.CarlsonJ.BartramC. R.HanssonM. G. (2007). Ethical framework for previously collected biobank samples. Nat. Biotechnol.25 (9), 973–976. 10.1038/nbt0907-973b
8
HuttinC. C.LiebmanM. N. (2013). The economics of biobanking and pharmacogenetics databasing. Technol. Health Care21 (2), 183–190. 10.3233/THC-130729
9
LeitãoL. P.SouzaT. P.RodriguesJ. C.FernandesM. R.SantosS.SantosN. P. (2020). The metabolization profile of the CYP2D6 gene in amerindian populations: a review. Genes11 (3), 262. 10.3390/genes11030262
10
MalsagovaK.KopylovA.StepanovA.ButlovaT.SinitsynaA.IzotovA.et al (2020). Biobanks-A platform for scientific and biomedical research. Diagnostics10, 485. 10.3390/diagnostics10070485
11
MatimbaA.OlukaM. N.EbeshiB. U.SayiJ.BolajiO. O.GuantaiA. N.et al (2008). Establishment of a biobank and pharmacogenetics database of African populations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.16 (7), 780–783. 10.1038/ejhg.2008.49
12
McInnesG.AltmanR. B. (2020). Drug response pharmacogenetics for 200,000 UK biobank participants. bioRxiv. [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.08.09.243311v1
13
MullerH.DagherG.LoibnerM.StumptnerC.KunglP.ZatloukalK. (2020). Biobanks for life sciences and personalized medicine. importance of standarization, biosafety, biosecurity and data management. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.65, 45–51. 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.004
14
NabirotchkinS.PelufoA.RinaudoPh.YuJ.HajjR.CohenD. (2020). Next-generation drug repurposing using human genetics and network biology. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.51, 78–92. 10.1016/j.coph.2019.12.004
15
OpreaT. I.BologaC. G.BrunakS.CampbellA.GanG. N.GaultonA.et al (2018). Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.17 (5), 317–332. 10.1038/nrd.2018.14
16
OvsyannikovaI. G.HaralambievaI. H.CrookeS. N.PolandG. A.KennedyR. B. (2020). The role of host genetics in the immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 and COVID‐19 susceptibility and severity. Immunological Rev.296 (1), 205–219. 10.1111/imr.12897
17
PaskalW.PaskalA. M.DębskiT.GryziakM.JaworowskiJ. (2018). Aspects of modern biobank activity—comprehensive review. Pathol. Oncol. Res.24 (4), 771–785. 10.1007/s12253-018-0418-4
18
ReisbergS.KrebsK.LepametsM.KalsM.MägiR.MetsaluK.et al (2019). Translating genotype data of 44,000 biobank participants into clinical pharmacogenetic recommendations: challenges and solutions. Genet. Med.21 (6), 1345–1354. 10.1038/s41436-018-0337-5
19
RollinsonV.TurnerR.PirmohamedM. (2020). Pharmacogenomics for primary care: an overview. Genes11 (11), 1337. 10.3390/genes11111337
20
SakJ.PawlikowskiJ.GoniewiczM.WittM. (2012). Population biobanking in selected European countries and proposed model for a polish national DNA bank. J. Appl. Genet.53 (2), 159–165. 10.1007/s13353-012-0082-4
21
SharmaA.BuschmannM. M.GilbertJ. A. (2019). Pharmacomicrobiomics: the holy grail to variability in drug response?Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.106 (2), 317–328. 10.1002/cpt.1437
22
Sosa-MacíasM.TeranE.WatersW.ForsM. M.AltamiranoC.Jung-CookH.et al (2016). Pharmacogenetics and ethnicity: relevance for clinical implementation, clinical trials, pharmacovigilance and drug regulation in Latin America. Pharmacogenomics17 (16), 1741–1747. 10.2217/pgs-2016-0153
23
SteinsbekkK. S.Kåre MyskjaB.SolbergB. (2013). Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?Eur. J. Hum. Genet.21 (9), 897–902. 10.1038/ejhg.2012.282
24
Suarez-KurtzG.ParraE. J. (2018). “Chapter six—population diversity in pharmacogenetics: a Latin American perspective,” in Advances in pharmacology. Editors BrøsenEn. K.DamkierP. (Academic Press), Vol. 83, 133–154.
Summary
Keywords
biobank, Amerindian, COVID-19, mestizo, diversity
Citation
Vargas RJ and Cobar OM (2021) The Urgent Need for Management of Biological Samples and Data Accessibility in Latin America. Front. Pharmacol. 12:620043. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.620043
Received
21 October 2020
Accepted
15 February 2021
Published
19 March 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Matias F. Martinez, University of Chile, Chile
Reviewed by
M. Isabel Lucena, University of Malaga, Spain
Alfonso Dueñas-González, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Vargas and Cobar.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rodrigo José Vargas, rodrigovargas@galileo.edu
This article was submitted to Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.