Abstract
Variants of the SCN1A gene encoding the neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.1 cause over 85% of all cases of Dravet syndrome, a severe and often pharmacoresistent epileptic encephalopathy with mostly infantile onset. But with the increased availability of genetic testing for patients with epilepsy, variants in SCN1A have now also been described in a range of other epilepsy phenotypes. The vast majority of these epilepsy-associated variants are de novo, and most are either nonsense variants that truncate the channel or missense variants that are presumed to cause loss of channel function. However, biophysical analysis has revealed a significant subset of missense mutations that result in increased excitability, further complicating approaches to precision pharmacotherapy for patients with SCN1A variants and epilepsy. We describe clinical and biophysical data of a familial SCN1A variant encoding the NaV1.1 L1624Q mutant. This substitution is located on the extracellular linker between S3 and S4 of Domain IV of NaV1.1 and is a rare case of a familial SCN1A variant causing an autosomal dominant frontal lobe epilepsy. We expressed wild-type (WT) and L1642Q channels in CHO cells. Using patch-clamp to characterize channel properties at several temperatures, we show that the L1624Q variant increases persistent current, accelerates fast inactivation onset and decreases current density. While SCN1A-associated epilepsy is typically considered a loss-of-function disease, our results put L1624Q into a growing set of mixed gain and loss-of-function variants in SCN1A responsible for epilepsy.
Introduction
SCN1A encodes the alpha subunit of the neuronal voltage gated sodium channel NaV1.1 and variants of this gene are known to cause a variety of epilepsy phenotypes in humans. The alpha subunit is the primary component of the sodium channel and is sufficient to conduct current although it is typically paired with auxiliary beta subunits in vivo (). Voltage gated sodium channels are comprised of four homologous domains (DI-DIV) (). Each domain is made up of six transmembrane segments (S1–S6); S1–S4 make up the voltage sensing region, while S5 and S6 form the channel pore. Upon depolarization, the movement of the positively charged S4 segment toward the extracellular surface causes a conformational change that opens the pore, resulting in an influx of sodium (; ; ). Within a few milliseconds, the intracellular loop connecting DIII and DIV (illustrated as h in Figure 1), moves to block the channel pore and prevent further sodium influx in a process termed fast inactivation ().
FIGURE 1
The association between SCN1A and epilepsy is best documented for Dravet syndrome, a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (; ; ), with up to 85% of patients with Dravet syndrome carrying a pathogenic variant in SCN1A (; ). Dravet syndrome presents with a difficult to treat () epilepsy with multiple seizure types, including hemiclonic, myoclonic and tonic-clonic seizures in previously healthy infants within the first year of life, and is typically followed by developmental delays (Yakoub et al., 1992; ; Wolff et al., 2006; ; ). In many cases, seizures are triggered by elevated body temperature, which can be the result of a fever, exercise, or taking a hot bath ().
However, SCN1A gene variants are also a recognized cause for epilepsies and neurodevelopmental disorders outside the Dravet syndrome spectrum—ranging from milder phenotypes such as generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (), to other epilepsy syndromes such as myoclonic astatic epilepsy, epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures, or even to recently described more severe early onset epileptic encephalopathies with neurodegeneration and dyskinesia (; ; ). With increased genetic testing, SCN1A variants have been described in patients with focal epilepsies (Vezyroglou et al., 2020)—both in patients that were candidates for epilepsy surgery, and those with self-limiting focal epilepsies of childhood. These patients are part of a minority of cases of focal epilepsy for which single gene causes have been identified. Other well-characterized focal epilepsies with single gene causes include familial focal epilepsy with variable foci caused by DEPDC5 variants (), childhood epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes caused by GRIN2A variants (), and autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (ADNFLE) associated with CHRNA4, CHRNB2, CHRNA2, KCNT1, DEPDC5, or CRH ().
In a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across unselected epilepsies, SCN1A is one of only few genes with a significant association with epilepsy. Furthermore, other neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders, such as hemiplegic migraine and autism spectrum disorders, have now been described in the context of SCN1A variants (). Taken together, these insights suggest much greater relevance of variants in SCN1A in a range of neurodevelopmental disorders extending beyond Dravet syndrome.
Over 1,200 SCN1A distinct variants have been associated with epilepsy (; ). Although traditionally considered a loss-of-function disease, biophysical analysis has revealed a wide range of presentations, with some variants resulting in an increase in channel function, others a decrease, and some a mixture of loss- and gain-of-function (Sugawara et al., 2003; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). This heterogeneity makes SCN1A epilepsies extremely challenging to treat, as a medication that improves seizures in one patient may exacerbate them in another. For example, both lamotrigine and carbamazepine have been found to worsen seizures in Dravet Syndrome (Wakai et al., 1996; ; ) but there has been contrasting evidence suggesting that they have been an effective therapy for a subset of patients (; Snoeijen-Schouwenaars et al., 2015). This highlights the importance of individualized therapy for patients with SCN1A related epilepsies, and the need for a better understanding of the range of epilepsy-causing variants. Unfortunately, to date the ability to consistently predict links between genotype, channel function, and phenotype remains elusive ().
This paper presents both clinical and biophysical data for the SCN1A variant c.4871T > G; p. L1624Q. In contrast to the more typical de novo variants, L1624Q was found across a two-generation pedigree. Unusually, affected members showed nocturnal hypermotor seizures that were confirmed to be of frontal lobe origin by video-EEG-monitoring in the index case, diagnostic of autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy without a family history of febrile seizures. This variant is located on the extracellular linker between S3 and S4 of Domain IV of NaV1.1 (Figure 1). Using patch-clamp to characterize channel properties, we show that the L1624Q variant causes an increase in persistent current, accelerates fast inactivation onset, and decreases current density. Experiments were conducted at both 22°C and 37°C to provide a measure of temperature sensitivity with data that allows comparison to previous studies. While most SCN1A-related epilepsies are typically considered a loss-of-function disease, our results put L1624Q into a growing set of mixed gain and loss-of-function variants in SCN1A responsible for early childhood epilepsy.
Methods
Patient Selection
Patients who have tested positive for missense variants in SCN1A on clinical genetic testing at the tertiary epilepsy service at King’s College Hospital/Evelina London Children’s Hospital, London were collated in a research database. There, an anonymized, limited set of clinical information is being captured, including syndromic electroclinical diagnoses, and limited information on family history. Ethical approval for the use of single gene sequencing data and anonymized clinical information has been given by the UK Health Research Authority (IRAS 229772).
Based on this database, we identified the patient carrying the L1624Q variant based on a syndromic diagnosis of autosomal nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy, classically characterized by recurrent, nocturnal focal seizures of frontal lobe origin with a positive family history of similar seizures in first degree relatives suggesting an autosomal inheritance.
Clinical Features
The identified patient was born by elective caesarean at term and there were no significant immediate problems. Her mother was on lamotrigine, sodium valproate, and carbamazepine during the pregnancy. There were some early developmental concerns with mild motor delay (walking at 18 months) and she was later identified as being hypermobile. She had delayed speech milestones, not putting sentences together until age three and half years. A comprehensive assessment at age 7.9 years demonstrated a marked discrepancy between verbal and non-verbal scores with non-verbal reasoning, visuospatial skills, and processing in the upper end of the ability range [PIQ 131 (98%)]. Verbal abilities and working memory were markedly lower especially for comprehension tasks with some scores in the impaired range so that a meaningful overall verbal IQ score could not be expressed. Further language assessments demonstrated that processing and producing language was effortful and her profile was consistent with a developmental language disorder. There was no evidence for an additional autism spectrum disorder. Of note at the time of this assessment, she was on monotherapy with low dose lamotrigine so it is unlikely that there were adverse effects of medication contributing to this profile.
The child’s habitual seizures had begun around a year of age with recurrent brief nocturnal motor seizures with the appearance on home video recordings of asymmetric predominantly tonic motor seizures. On occasions as she got older, she reported daytime visual phenomena with visual hallucinations then numbness of either arm and then headache suggestive of a migrainous etiology, though she also reported from time to time that the same visual features would occur prior to her motor seizures at night. Treatment with valproate was unsuccessful, levetiracetam made behavior worse and exacerbated the visual hallucinations, whereas lamotrigine in modest dose appeared most helpful. Higher dose appeared to make the situation worse. The addition of clobazam at night was helpful. Illness was a clear trigger for seizures, but most occurred spontaneously.
Her mother reported a history of focal seizures in several generations with her own epilepsy continuing to be difficult to control, but with lamotrigine felt to be the most helpful medication. She was cognitively able but there was an impression again of problems processing and expressing language, which appeared more than those expected as English was being spoken as a second language. She had not been formally tested. The child’s older sister had a history of epilepsy as did her older brother in his case beginning around age 6 again manifesting as recurrent nocturnal seizures. Treatment with valproate was helpful initially but seizures recurred when this was withdrawn and then did not respond to this, so levetiracetam and then lamotrigine was substituted. He also developed seizures with an initial visual aura, in his case with black and white dots and then visual obscuration evolving into predominantly asymmetric tonic seizures. He also reported that daytime seizures could be triggered by patterns. The addition of low dose clobazam at night was also helpful for him. He had additional co-morbidities with some educational difficulties, dyspraxia and autism but was in mainstream schooling throughout.
Gene profiling was performed using next generation sequencing on blood samples. No variants had been identified in the genes typically associated with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (CHRNA4, CHRNB2, CHRNA2 < KCNT1, DEPDC5, CRH).
Mutagenesis and Bacterial Transformation
Wildtype SCN1A DNA in a PCDM8 vector was used for mutagenesis, and has been described in a previous paper (). The L1624Q variant was generated using a QuikChange Lightening Site Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies) with the following primers:
Forward: 5′ cac gaa ata ctt ttc tat ctg ctc ggc aag aaa cat acc 3′
Reverse: 5′ ggt atg ttt ctt gcc gag cag ata gaa aag tat ttc gtg 3′
DNA was transformed into TOP10/P3 Escherichia coli bacteria (Invitrogen) and grown at 30°C. The entire length of the sodium channel was sequenced to confirm that no spontaneous mutations had occurred.
Cell Culture
CHOk1 cells (Sigma-Alrich) were grown in Ham’s F-12 nutrient mixture supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) at 37°C. Using Polyfect (Qiagen), cells were transfected with 1 μg of SCN1A (wildtype or mutant), 1 μg of eGFP, and 0.5 μg of the β1 subunit. Cells were plated on sterile glass coverslips approximately 24 h after transfection, and experiments were performed 24–48 h later.
Patch Clamp Experiments
Whole cell patch clamp experiments were performed at 22°C and 37°C with an EPC9 patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA Elektronik) and Patchmaster software (Heka Electronic). Temperature was maintained with a TC-10 Temperature controller (Dagan). Glass pipettes were pulled with a P-1000 puller (Sutter Instruments), dipped in wax, and polished to a resistance of 1.0–1.5 MΩ. Intracellular solution contained 130 mM CsF, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM EGTA, and 10 mM HEPES. Extracellular solution contained 140 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM HEPES. Both solutions were titrated to a pH 7.4 with CsOH.
Protocols
To determine the voltage-dependence of channel activation, membrane potential was depolarized to potentials between −100 mV and +70 mV for 10 ms from a holding potential of −130 mV. Conductance was determined by dividing peak current by the observed reversal potential subtracted from membrane potential. Normalized conductance was plotted against voltage and fit by a Boltzmann equation. The time constant of fast inactivation onset at voltages between −30 mV and +20 mV was determined by fitting the decay of the current with a single exponential equation. Current density was calculated with current at 0 mV.
To measure the voltage-dependence of channel fast inactivation, the membrane was held at potentials ranging from −130 mV to +10 mV for 200 ms, followed by a 19 ms test pulse at 0 mV. Steady-state fast inactivation was measured as the proportion of current remaining in the 0 mV test pulse. The normalized current was plotted against voltage and fit by a single Boltzmann equation.
The rate of inactivation recovery was determined by holding the membrane potential at 0 mV for 200 ms followed by a −90 mV recovery pulse for increasing amounts of time. The time of fast inactivation recovery was measured as the proportion of current after the −90 mV recovery pulse. The normalized current was plotted versus recovery time and fit with a double exponential equation.
The fraction of non-inactivating current was measured during a 50 ms pulse from −130 to 0 mV. The percentage of persistent current was determined by dividing the current amplitude measured at the end of the 50 ms depolarizing pulse by the peak current. The current amplitude measured between 25 and 30 ms was also divided by the peak current to confirm that the persistent current had stabilized and reached steady-state.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with JMP software (SAS Institute) using a multi-factor analysis of variance. To test whether the L1624Q variant and wildtype channels have differential temperature sensitivity, the interaction between temperature and mutant was used as a predictor variable in the model. If no differential temperature sensitivity was found, temperature and mutant effects were evaluated independently. Fast inactivation onset time constants ranging from −30 mV to +20 mV were log transformed prior to analysis such that values were normally distributed. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Neuronal Action Potential Modelling
To simulate how L1624Q-dependent perturbations on channel gating alter cortical neuron firing, we modified prior models of pyramidal neuron firing (Traub et al., 1991; ). The methodology is described in prior publications (; ) and codes to run cortical neuron simulations in Python are freely available online (https://github.com/roschkoenig/SodMod). The increased rate of inactivation onset in the L1624Q variant at 37°C was implemented by multiplying the rate of inactivation onset by 1.485, reflecting the average increase in inactivation rates measured between −30 and +20 mV at 37°C. Because persistent sodium currents were not included in the original cortical neuron model, a non-inactivating (lacking the “h” gate) component of the fast sodium current was implemented with activation and deactivation rates 1,000 times those of the fast sodium current. The maximal conductance of the non-inactivating current was set at 10% of the fast component multiplied by the measured fraction of inactivating current at 37°C (1.8% in WT and 4.6% in L1624Q; see https://github.com/roschkoenig/SodMod).
We implemented single-compartment neuron models that were stimulated with three different regimes. Injections of 1–100 pA for 1 s were used to measure the effects of the L1624Q variant on the rates of action potential firing at steady-state (Figures 5A,B). To measure the effects of L1624Q on persistent action potential firing, cells were injected with 10 pA of current for 50 ms after which the stimulus was removed (Figure 5C). Finally, to measure membrane dynamics across a range of injected currents, action potential firing was measured during a slowly increasing ramp of current injection between ∼0.002 and 400 pA (Figure 6). Ramps were delivered following a period of inactivity with no current injection or following a 10 ms pre-stimulus of 10 pA to induce neuronal firing.
Results
L1624Q Decreases Current Density at 37°C, but Does not Shift the Voltage-Dependence of Activation
Sample macroscopic sodium currents from WT (black) and L1624Q (red) channels at 22°C and 37°C are shown in Figures 2A–D. At 22°C, there are no significant differences in the current density between mutant and WT channels, indicating functional channel expression with the L1624Q variant (p = 0.5725; Figure 2E); however, current density is significantly reduced in L1624Q channels at 37°C (WT = 72.82 pA/pF, LQ = 45.42 pA/pF; p = 0.0021; Figure 2E). There is no significant mutant or temperature-dependent effect on the midpoint (V1/2) of the conductance-voltage relationship (p = 0.0791 and p = 0.4971 respectively). These results indicate that at physiological temperatures the L1624Q variant causes a loss-of-function by reducing peak current amplitudes, but this effect is not due to changes in channel activation.
FIGURE 2
L1624Q Speeds the Rate of Fast Inactivation Onset
Steady state fast inactivation curves at 22°C and 37°C are compared in Figures 3A,B. There is a significant right shift in the midpoint of steady-state fast inactivation with increased temperature (p = 0.0123), but it does not differ between WT and variant (p = 0.6998). The rates of fast inactivation onset in the L1624Q variant are significantly more sensitive to increases in temperature compared to WT channels (p = 0.0089). While there are no differences in the rate of fast inactivation at 22°C in L1624Q compared to WT (p ≥ 0.2680; Figure 2C), the L1624Q variant increases the rate of fast inactivation onset at 37°C between −20 and +20 mV (p ≤ 0.0116; Figure 3D). The rate of recovery from fast inactivation at −90 mV is not significantly difference between L1624Q and wildtype (p = 0.8490).
FIGURE 3
L1624Q Increases Persistent Current
The fraction of non-inactivating (persistent) current was measured at the end of 50 ms depolarizations at 22°C and 37°C (Figures 4A,B). Persistent current is significantly higher in L1624Q channels compared to wildtype at both 22°C (INAPLQ = 3.20%, INAPWT = 0.95%; p = 0.0039) and 37°C (Figure 4C; INAPLQ = 4.58%, INAPWT = 2.27%; p = 0.0032). In contrast to the loss-of-function in peak current amplitude, this indicates that the L1624Q variant causes a gain-of-function in the fraction of non-inactivating current.
FIGURE 4
Neuronal Simulations
To investigate the effects of the L1624Q variant on cortical neuron excitability we implemented a single-compartment pyramidal neuron simulation based on previously published models (Traub et al., 1991; ; ). Sodium currents in the simulated L1624Q neurons were parameterized to reflect the increased rate of fast inactivation onset and the increased fraction of non-inactivating sodium current. The increased rate of inactivation in turn decreases peak currents in the L1624Q model by approximately 25% (Figure 5Binset). This decrease is within the 95% confidence interval for the experimental decrease in peak current density in the L1624Q mutant (6.61−68.64%). In response to prolonged stimulations at set input currents up to 40 pA, the L1624Q expressing neurons fired at lower current injections (Figure 5A) and at slightly faster rates (Figure 5B) than WT neurons. In response to a short stimulus injection, the L1624Q simulations display persistent action potential firing that continues after the stimulus is removed (Figure 5C). Persistent firing did not terminate within the 1s simulation time. Persistent firing in the L1624Q variant is seen during a slowly increasing stimulus current ramp following a period of action potential firing (Figure 6). Interestingly, the L1624Q simulations enter depolarization block at lower stimulus currents than the WT simulations during stimulus ramps from rest or following action potential firing (Figure 6).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
To further investigate the effects of increased persistent currents and faster rates of inactivation onset in L1624Q, we also modelled these effects separately. These models show that the increased persistent currents in L1624Q are primarily responsible for lower firing thresholds (Supplementary Figure S1A) and persistent AP firing (Supplementary Figure S1B). In addition, reduced current due to faster inactivation allows for slightly faster firing rates and is also partially responsible for the increased depolarization block in L1624Q (Supplementary Figure S1C). Overall, these simulations suggest that the mixed gain- and loss-of-function in the L1624Q variant leads to hyperexcitability at lower stimulus inputs and diminished excitability during larger stimuli.
Discussion
Despite the strong association between variants of the SCN1A gene and Dravet syndrome, there is considerable heterogeneity in the phenotypes of SCN1A associated epilepsies (Sugawara et al., 2003; ; ; ; ; ). In fact, even in genome-wide analyses of common epilepsies, SCN1A is identified as a key risk gene () suggesting that the phenotypes associated with SCN1A variants extend far beyond the patients with more severe childhood onset epilepsies in whom a clinical diagnosis of SCN1A variants is now made on routine clinical testing. We currently lack the ability to make in silico predictions about channel function from genetic data (), limiting the current use of genetic insights in guiding treatment and prognosis for the heterogeneous SCN1A-related epilepsies. Understanding the functional effects of unique mutants, particularly when associated with unusual phenotypes, is an essential next step for understanding genotype-phenotype relationships in SCN1A-associated epilepsies. Here we show that the familial L1624Q variant is associated with increased persistent current as well as accelerated fast inactivation onset and decreased current density in response to increased temperature. Simulations of cortical neuron firing predict that this mixture of loss- and gain-of-function effects will cause both hyperexcitability, in the form of persistent firing, as well as increased entry into depolarization block. Although most SCN1A-associated epilepsies are considered a loss-of-function disease, our results put L1624Q into a growing set of mixed gain and loss-of-function variants in SCN1A responsible for an increasing set of epilepsy phenotypes ().
Familial Variants in Epilepsy
Even though epilepsy is highly heritable, only for a minority of patients can a single gene diagnosis currently be established. The yield of genetic diagnoses is highest in the early epileptic encephalopathies, for epilepsies associated with certain comorbidities, and for certain epilepsy syndromes, such as familial focal epilepsies (; ; Stefanski et al., 2021). However, despite the high heritability in the epilepsies generally, few patients with a familial epilepsy are diagnosed with a single causative gene mutation. In a population based Scottish national cohort study of 333 patients with epilepsy presenting with seizure onset before the age of 36 months, 15 of 80 single gene diagnoses made were in familial epilepsies with variants inherited from an affected parent (Symonds et al., 2019).
Among the familial focal epilepsies, autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy (or autosomal dominant sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy) was one of the first epilepsy syndromes in which causative single gene mutations could be identified in patients. Yet collectively the known genes only explain approximately 10% of cases. Similarly, the yield of genetic testing across familial focal epilepsies remains below ∼12% even with panel and genomic testing approaches (Tinuper et al., 2016; ).
For SCN1A, familial cases have initially helped establish an association with epilepsy in the context of generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) (Wallace et al., 2001). However, most variants are now detected in sporadic cases of Dravet syndrome as de novo variants. Only about 10% of SCN1A variants are familial, and these are typically associated with milder phenotypes (). The case presented here represents an extension of the SCN1A-associated epilepsy phenotypes with the clinical features of an epilepsy syndrome classically associated with different genetic causes.
Persistent Current
Perhaps the most striking effect of the L1624Q mutant on channel activity was the large increase in persistent current passed by the channels. Despite its relatively small amplitude, persistent current can have profound impacts on sodium channel function, such as enhancing repetitive firing, heightening depolarization in the sub- and near-threshold voltage range, and reducing the threshold for action potential firing (; Stafstrom, 2007; ). This abnormal neuronal activity often results in epilepsy syndromes. For example, the SCN1A variant P1632S, also located on the extracellular linker between S3 and S4 of Domain IV, exhibits a similar pattern of increased persistent current and an accelerated fast inactivation fast time constant τ1 leading to childhood epilepsy (). Indeed, our simulations predict that persistent currents in the L1624Q variant lead to continued action potential firing even after a stimulating current is removed. Interestingly, lamotrigine, a sodium channel blocker that is effective in reducing persistent current at clinically appropriate doses (Stafstrom, 2007), was reported to be effective in the L1624Q patients, despite being notorious for aggravating SCN1A related seizures (; ; ). This effect highlights the variability in response to anti-convulsant drugs and the considerable heterogeneity between patients with SCN1A related epilepsies.
Mixed-Function Variants in Epilepsy
The L1624Q variant falls into a growing class of mixed loss- and gain-of-function variants in NaV1.1 (; ; ; ; Volkers et al., 2011; ; ; ; ; ). These variants are characterized by multiple defects that cause opposing effects on channel activation and inactivation. In many cases this takes the form similar to what we report here where increases in persistent sodium current occur along with a decrease in the peak sodium current (; ; ; ; ; Spampanato et al., 2004; ; Volkers et al., 2011). As discussed above, increases in persistent current can produce spontaneous activity and burst firing. In contrast, other variants that shift the activation and inactivation voltage dependences can alter the threshold for AP firing or alter depolarization block at higher inputs (; ). The L1624Q variant studied here shows a mixture of increased persistent currents and decreased peak current density. It is likely that the decreased peak current at higher temperatures is due to the rapid fast inactivation onset in this variant that may lead to significant inactivation before channels are fully activated as was shown in other sodium channel isoforms (; ).
The mixture of loss- and gain-of-function in other voltage-gated sodium channel isoforms is known to cause overlapping syndromes with characteristics of multiple disease states; these include mixed Brugada and long QT syndrome type 3 variants in NaV1.5 (; ) as well as mixed periodic paralysis and myotonia variants in NaV1.4 (Webb and Cannon, 2008; ). Thus far, the growing list of mixed variants in NaV1.1 have been part of the epileptic spectrum, ranging from less severe generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures (GEFS+) to severe infantile epileptic encephalopathies (; ; ; Volkers et al., 2017; ). The mixed variant T226M has been associated with a more severe early onset, atrophy of the brain, and dyskinesia due to a lack of depolarization block (; ). We recently reported a case of a large inward persistent current causing drug resistant and fatal epilepsy with atrophy and a dyskinetic disorder (). Drug resistance is not uncommon in epilepsy associated with SCN1A variants, and has also been reported in many of the mixed-function variants discussed above (; ; ; ). Some of these patients have benefited from anti-epileptic drugs such as lamotrigine (Volkers et al., 2011), sodium valproate (Volkers et al., 2011; ) and levetiracetam (Volkers et al., 2011), but there is no evidence that any of these drugs are a panacea for mixed-function variants in SCN1A. The current case demonstrates that specific dysfunction in NaV1.1 beyond simple loss of function may be associated with phenotypes not classically associated with mutations in SCN1A. These expansions of the phenotypic spectrum of SCN1A mutations further complicate the already tenuous relationships between genotype and phenotype (). Whether additional data will delineate other loss-of-function and gain-of-function variants into clear phenotypes remains to be tested.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
EH, RR, and DP contributed to clinical diagnosis of the patient. CP, LJ, and PR designed experiments. LJ, MO and CP performed experiments. LJ and CP analyzed data. LJ, CP, and PR interpreted the results of the experiments. LJ and CP prepared figures. LJ, CP, RR, and EH wrote the manuscript. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/03920-2018), the Rare Disease Foundation and the Dravet Foundation of Canada. CP is supported by AHA postdoctoral fellowships (19POST34380777 and 830889). RR is supported by a Wellcome Trust grant (209164/Z/17/Z). Funders were not involved in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.788192/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure S1Persistent currents in L1624Q are responsible for repetitive firing. (A): Simulated action potential firing rates of modified L1624Q expressing neurons at 37°C in response to stimuli between 1 and 100 pA with only variant-dependent changes in fast inactivation (blue) or persistent current (purple) included. WT (black) and L1624Q (red) data from Figure 5 are included for comparison. (B): Simulated action potential firing of modified L1624Q (fast inactivation—blue; persistent current—purple) expressing neurons at 37°C in response to a 10 pA stimulus for 50 ms followed by zero stimulus. (C): Simulated action potential firing in modified L1624Q (fast inactivation—blue; persistent current—purple) expressing neurons at 37°C in response to a slowly increasing stimulus current (bottom). Simulations are conducted following a 10 ms pre-stimulus of 10 pA to induce AP firing. The points at which WT (black line) and L1624Q (red line) expressing neurons stopped firing during the same protocol (Figure 6) are shown for comparison.
References
1
AbdelsayedM.PetersC. H.RubenP. C. (2015). Differential Thermosensitivity in Mixed Syndrome Cardiac Sodium Channel Mutants. J. Physiol.593 (18), 4201–4223. 10.1113/JP270139
2
AndersonL. L.HawkinsN. A.ThompsonC. H.KearneyJ. A.GeorgeA. L. (2017). Unexpected Efficacy of a Novel Sodium Channel Modulator in Dravet Syndrome. Sci. Rep.7, 1682. 10.1038/s41598-017-01851-9
3
AnneyR. J. L.AvbersekA.BaldingD.BaumL.BeckerF.BerkovicS. F.et al (2014). Genetic Determinants of Common Epilepsies: A Meta-Analysis of Genome-wide Association Studies. Lancet Neurol.13 (9), 893–903. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70171-1
4
BeckV. C.HullJ. M.IsomL. L. (2019). Beyond Dravet Syndrome: Characterization of a Novel, More Severe SCN1A-Linked Epileptic Encephalopathy. Epilepsy Curr.19 (4), 266–268. 10.1177/1535759719858339
5
BereckiG.BrysonA.TerhagJ.MaljevicS.GazinaE. V.HillS. L.et al (2019). SCN1A Gain of Function in Early Infantile Encephalopathy. Ann. Neurol.85 (4), 514–525. 10.1002/ana.25438
6
BezzinaC.VeldkampM. W.Van Den BergM. P.PostmaA. V.RookM. B.ViersmaJ. W.et al (1999). A Single Na(+) Channel Mutation Causing Both Long-QT and Brugada Syndromes. Circ. Res.85 (12), 1206–1213. 10.1161/01.RES.85.12.1206
7
BrunklausA.LalD. (2020). Sodium Channel Epilepsies and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: from Disease Mechanisms to Clinical applicationDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol.62 (Issue 7), 784–792. 10.1111/dmcn.14519
8
ChandaB.BezanillaF. (2002). Tracking Voltage-dependent Conformational Changes in Skeletal Muscle Sodium Channel during Activation. J. Gen. Physiol.120, 629–645. 10.1085/jgp.20028679
9
ChironC. (2011). Current Therapeutic Procedures in Dravet Syndrome. Dev. Med. Child Neurol.53, 16–18. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03967.x
10
ClaesL.CeulemansB.AudenaertD.SmetsK.LöfgrenA.Del-FaveroJ.et al (2003). De Novo SCN1A Mutations Are a Major Cause of Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy. Hum. Mutat.21 (6), 615–621. 10.1002/humu.10217
11
CooperM. S.McintoshA.CromptonD. E.McMahonJ. M.SchneiderA.FarrellK.et al (2016). Mortality in Dravet Syndrome. Epilepsy Res.128, 43–47. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.10.006
12
CovanisA. (2012). Epileptic Encephalopathies (Including Severe Epilepsy Syndromes). Epilepsia53 Suppl 4, 114–126. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03621.x
13
DalicL.MullenS. A.Roulet PerezE.SchefferI. (2015). Lamotrigine Can Be Beneficial in Patients with Dravet Syndrome. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol.57, 200–202. 10.1111/dmcn.12593
14
DengP.-Y.KlyachkoV. A. (2016). Increased Persistent Sodium Current Causes Neuronal Hyperexcitability in the Entorhinal Cortex of Fmr1 Knockout Mice. Cel Rep.16, 3157–3166. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.046
15
DestexheA.ContrerasD.SejnowskiT. J.SteriadeM. (1994). A Model of Spindle Rhythmicity in the Isolated Thalamic Reticular Nucleus. J. Neurophysiol.72 (2), 803–818. 10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.803
16
DibbensL. M.De VriesB.DonatelloS.HeronS. E.HodgsonB. L.ChintawarS.et al (2013). Mutations in DEPDC5 Cause Familial Focal Epilepsy with Variable Foci. Nat. Genet.45 (5), 546–551. 10.1038/ng.2599
17
DravetC. (1978). Les épilepsies graves de l’enfant. Vie Med.59 (8), 543–548.
18
DravetC. (2011). The Core Dravet Syndrome Phenotype. Epilepsia52, 3–9. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.02994.x
19
EngelJ. (2001). A Proposed Diagnostic Scheme for People with Epileptic Seizures and with Epilepsy: Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia42, 796–803. 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.10401.x
20
EscaygA.GoldinA. L. (2010). Sodium Channel SCN1A and Epilepsy: Mutations and Mechanisms. Epilepsia51, 1650–1658. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02640.x
21
EscaygA.MacDonaldB. T.MeislerM. H.BaulacS.HuberfeldG.An-GourfinkelI.et al (2000). Mutations of SCN1A, Encoding a Neuronal Sodium Channel, in Two Families with GEFS+2. Nat. Genet.24 (4), 343–345. 10.1038/74159
22
EscaygA.HeilsA.MacdonaldB. T.HaugK.SanderT.MeislerM. H. (2001). A Novel SCN1A Mutation Associated with Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus-Aand Prevalence of Variants in Patients with Epilepsy. Am. J. Hum. Genet.68 (4), 866–873. 10.1086/319524
23
FujiwaraT.SugawaraT.Mazaki-MiyazakiE.TakahashiY.FukushimaK.WatanabeM.et al (2003). Mutations of Sodium Channel Alpha Subunit Type 1 (SCN1A) in Intractable Childhood Epilepsies with Frequent Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures. Brain126 (3), 531–546. 10.1093/brain/awg053
24
GhovanlooM. R.AbdelsayedM.PetersC. H.RubenP. C. (2018). A Mixed Periodic Paralysis & Myotonia Mutant, P1158S, Imparts pH-Sensitivity in Skeletal Muscle Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 6304. 10.1038/s41598-018-24719-y
25
GonsalesM. C.MontenegroM. A.PretoP.GuerreiroM. M.CoanA. C.QuastM. P.et al (2019). Multimodal Analysis of SCN1A Missense Variants Improves Interpretation of Clinically Relevant Variants in Dravet Syndrome. Front. Neurol.10, 289. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00289
26
GormanK.PetersC.LynchB.JonesL.BassettD.KingM.et al (2021). Persistent Sodium Currents in SCN1A Developmental and Degenerative Epileptic Dyskinetic Encephalopathy. Brain Commun.3 (4), fcab235. in press. 10.1093/braincomms/fcab235
27
GuerriniR.DravetC.GentonP.BelmonteA.KaminskaA.Dulac+O. (1998). Lamotrigine and Seizure Aggravation in Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy. Epilepsia39, 508–512. 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01413.x
28
KontisK. J.RounaghiA.GoldinA. L. (1997). Sodium Channel Activation Gating Is Affected by Substitutions of Voltage Sensor Positive Charges in All Four Domains. J. Gen. Physiol.110, 391–401. 10.1085/jgp.110.4.391
29
KurahashiH.HiroseS. (2002). “Autosomal Dominant Nocturnal Frontal Lobe Epilepsy,” in GeneReviews® (Seattle (WA): University of Washington Seattle). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1169/.
30
LemkeJ. R.LalD.ReinthalerE. M.SteinerI.NothnagelM.AlberM.et al (2013). Mutations in GRIN2A Cause Idiopathic Focal Epilepsy with Rolandic Spikes. Nat. Genet.45 (9), 1067–1072. 10.1038/ng.2728
31
LiaoW.-P.ShiY.-W.LongY.-S.ZengY.LiT.YuM.-J.et al (2010). Partial Epilepsy with Antecedent Febrile Seizures and Seizure Aggravation by Antiepileptic Drugs: Associated with Loss of Function of Nav1.1. Epilepsia51, 1669–1678. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02645.x
32
LossinC.WangD. W.RhodesT. H.VanoyeC. G.GeorgeA. L. (2002). Molecular Basis of an Inherited Epilepsy. Neuron34 (6), 877–884. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00714-6
33
MarbanE.YamagishiT.TomaselliG. F. (1998). Structure and Function of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels. J. Physiol.508, 647–657. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.647bp.x
34
McTagueA.HowellK. B.CrossJ. H.KurianM. A.SchefferI. E. (2016). The Genetic Landscape of the Epileptic Encephalopathies of Infancy and Childhood. Lancet Neurol.15 (Issue 3), 304–316. 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00250-1
35
MengH.XuH.-Q.YuL.LinG.-W.HeN.SuT.et al (2015). TheSCN1AMutation Database: Updating Information and Analysis of the Relationships Among Genotype, Functional Alteration, and Phenotype. Hum. Mutat.36, 573–580. 10.1002/humu.22782
36
MullenS. A.CarvillG. L.BellowsS.BaylyM. A.TrucksH.LalD.et al (2013). Copy Number Variants Are Frequent in Genetic Generalized Epilepsy with Intellectual Disability. Neurology81 (17), 1507–1514. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a95829
37
NodaM.ShimizuS.TanabeT.TakaiT.KayanoT.IkedaT.et al (1984). Primary Structure of Electrophorus Electricus Sodium Channel Deduced from cDNA Sequence. Nature312, 121–127. 10.1038/312121a0
38
OatesS.TangS.RoschR.LearR.HughesE. F.WilliamsR. E.et al (2018). Incorporating Epilepsy Genetics into Clinical Practice: a 360°evaluation. NPJ Genom Med.3 (1), 13. 10.1038/s41525-018-0052-9
39
OhmoriI.OuchidaM.OhtsukaY.OkaE.ShimizuK. (2002). Significant Correlation of the SCN1A Mutations and Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy in Infancy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.295 (1), 17–23. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00617-4
40
OhmoriI.KahligK. M.RhodesT. H.WangD. W.GeorgeA. L. (2006). Nonfunctional SCN1A Is Common in Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy. Epilepsia47, 1636–1642. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00643.x
41
PetersC. H.RubenP. C. (2014). Introduction to Sodium Channels. Handbook Exp. Pharmacol.221, 1–6. 10.1007/978-3-642-41588-3_1
42
PetersC.RoschR. E.HughesE.RubenP. C. (2016). Temperature-dependent Changes in Neuronal Dynamics in a Patient with an SCN1A Mutation and Hyperthermia Induced Seizures. Sci. Rep.6, 31879. 10.1038/srep31879
43
PetersC. H.YuA.ZhuW.SilvaJ. R.RubenP. C. (2017). Depolarization of the Conductance-Voltage Relationship in the NaV1.5 Mutant, E1784K, Is Due to Altered Fast Inactivation. PLoS ONE12 (9), e0184605. 10.1371/journal.pone.0184605
44
PetersC. H.WatkinsA. R.PoirierO. L.RubenP. C. (2020). E1784K, the Most Common Brugada Syndrome and Long-QT Syndrome Type 3 Mutant, Disrupts Sodium Channel Inactivation through Two Separate Mechanisms. J. Gen. Physiol.152 (9), e202012595. 10.1085/JGP.202012595
45
RhodesT. H.LossinC.VanoyeC. G.WangD. W.GeorgeA. L. (2004). Noninactivating Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.101, 11147–11152. 10.1073/pnas.0402482101
46
RhodesT. H.VanoyeC. G.OhmoriI.OgiwaraI.YamakawaK.GeorgeA. L. (2005). Sodium Channel Dysfunction in Intractable Childhood Epilepsy with Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures. J. Physiol.569, 433–445. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.094326
47
RosanderC.HallböökT. (2015). Dravet Syndrome in Sweden: A Population-Based Study. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol.57, 628–633. 10.1111/dmcn.12709
48
SadleirL.MountierE.GillD.DavisS.JoshiC.DeVileC.et al (2017). Not all Epileptic Encephalopathies Are Dravet Syndrome: Early Profound Thr226Met Phenotype. Neurology89, 1035–1042. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004331
49
SchefferI. E.NabboutR. (2019). SCN1A-related Phenotypes: Epilepsy and beyond. Epilepsia60 Suppl 3 (S3), S17. 10.1111/epi.16386
50
ShiX.-Y.TomonohY.WangW.-Z.IshiiA.HigurashiN.KurahashiH.et al (2016). Efficacy of Antiepileptic Drugs for the Treatment of Dravet Syndrome with Different Genotypes. Brain Dev.38, 40–46. 10.1016/j.braindev.2015.06.008
51
Snoeijen-SchouwenaarsF. M.VeendrickM. J. B. M.Van MierloP.Van ErpG.De LouwA. J. A.KleineB. U.et al (2015). Carbamazepine and Oxcarbazepine in Adult Patients with Dravet Syndrome: Friend or Foe?Seizure29, 114–118. 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.03.010
52
SpampanatoJ.KearneyJ. A.De HaanG.McEwenD. P.EscaygA.AradiI.et al (2004). A Novel Epilepsy Mutation in the Sodium Channel SCN1A Identifies a Cytoplasmic Domain for Beta Subunit Interaction. J. Neurosci.24 (44), 10022–10034. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2034-04.2004
53
StafstromC. E. (2007). Persistent Sodium Current and its Role in Epilepsy. Epilepsy Curr.7, 15–22. 10.1111/j.1535-7511.2007.00156.x
54
StefanskiA.Calle-LópezY.LeuC.Pérez-PalmaE.Pestana-KnightE.LalD. (2021). Clinical Sequencing Yield in Epilepsy, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Epilepsia62 (1), 143–151. 10.1111/epi.16755
55
SugawaraT.TsurubuchiY.FujiwaraT.Mazaki-MiyazakiE.NagataK.MontalM.et al (2003). Nav1.1 Channels with Mutations of Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy in Infancy Display Attenuated Currents. Epilepsy Res.54 (2-3), 201–207. 10.1016/S0920-1211(03)00084-6
56
SymondsJ. D.ZuberiS. M.StewartK.McLellanA.O'ReganM.MacLeodS.et al (2019). Incidence and Phenotypes of Childhood-Onset Genetic Epilepsies: A Prospective Population-Based National Cohort. Brain142 (8), 2303–2318. 10.1093/brain/awz195
57
TinuperP.BisulliF.CrossJ. H.HesdorfferD.KahaneP.NobiliL.et al (2016). Definition and Diagnostic Criteria of Sleep-Related Hypermotor Epilepsy. Neurology86 (19), 1834–1842. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002666
58
TraubR. D.WongR. K.MilesR.MichelsonH. (1991). A Model of a CA3 Hippocampal Pyramidal Neuron Incorporating Voltage-Clamp Data on Intrinsic Conductances. J. Neurophysiol.66 (2), 635–650. 10.1152/jn.1991.66.2.635
59
VezyroglouA.VaradkarS.BastT.HirschE.StroblK.HarveyA. S.et al (2020). Focal Epilepsy in SCN1A-Mutation Carrying Patients: Is There a Role for Epilepsy Surgery?Dev. Med. Child. Neurol.62 (11), 1331–1335. 10.1111/dmcn.14588
60
VolkersL.KahligK. M.VerbeekN. E.DasJ. H.van KempenM. J.StroinkH.et al (2011). Nav 1.1 Dysfunction in Genetic Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures-Plus or Dravet Syndrome. Eur. J. Neurosci.34 (8), 1268–1275. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07826.x
61
VolkersL.KahligK. M.VerbeekN. E.DasJ. H. G.van KempenM. J. A.StroinkH.et al (2011). Nav1.1 Dysfunction in Genetic Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures-Plus or Dravet Syndrome. Eur. J. Neurosci.34 (10), 1268–1275. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07826.x
62
WakaiS.ItoN.SueokaH.KawamotoY.HayasakaH.ChibaS. (1996). Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy in Infancy and Carbamazepine. Eur. J. Pediatr.155, 724. 10.1007/bf01957165
63
WallaceR. H.SchefferI. E.BarnettS.RichardsM.DibbensL.DesaiR. R.et al (2001). Neuronal Sodium-Channel Alpha1-Subunit Mutations in Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus. Am. J. Hum. Genet.68, 859–865. 10.1086/319516
64
WebbJ.CannonS. C. (2008). Cold-induced Defects of Sodium Channel Gating in Atypical Periodic Paralysis Plus Myotonia. Neurology70 (10), 755–761. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000265397.70057.d8
65
WolffM.Cassé-PerrotC.DravetC. (2006). Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infants (Dravet Syndrome): Natural History and Neuropsychological Findings. Epilepsia47, 45–48. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00688.x
66
YakoubM.DulacO.JambaquéI.ChironC.PlouinP. (1992). Early Diagnosis of Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy in Infancy. Brain Dev.14, 299–303. 10.1016/S0387-7604(12)80147-1
Summary
Keywords
childhood epilepsy, sodium channelopathies, SCN1A variant, gain of function, loss of function
Citation
Jones LB, Peters CH, Rosch RE, Owers M, Hughes E, Pal DK and Ruben PC (2021) The L1624Q Variant in SCN1A Causes Familial Epilepsy Through a Mixed Gain and Loss of Channel Function. Front. Pharmacol. 12:788192. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.788192
Received
01 October 2021
Accepted
17 November 2021
Published
02 December 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
James Richard Groome, Idaho State University, United States
Reviewed by
Paola Imbrici, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
Filiz Onat, Acıbadem University, Turkey
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Jones, Peters, Rosch, Owers, Hughes, Pal and Ruben.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peter C. Ruben, pruben@sfu.ca
This article was submitted to Pharmacology of Ion Channels and Channelopathies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.