Abstract
The EMPA-REG OUTCOME (Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)) trial evidenced the potential of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for the treatment of patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Recent evidences have shown the benefits of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on improving liver steatosis and fibrosis in patients with T2DM. Metabolomic studies have been shown to be very useful to improve the understanding of liver pathophysiology during the development and progression of metabolic hepatic diseases, and because the effects of empagliflozin and of other SGLT2 inhibitors on the complete metabolic profile of the liver has never been analysed before, we decided to study the impact on the liver of male Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats of a treatment for 6 weeks with empagliflozin using an untargeted metabolomics approach, with the purpose to help to clarify the benefits of the use of empagliflozin at hepatic level. We found that empagliflozin is able to change the hepatic lipidome towards a protective profile, through an increase of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated glycerides, phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, lysophosphatidylinositols and lysophosphatidylcholines. Empagliflozin also induces a decrease in the levels of the markers of inflammation IL-6, chemerin and chemerin receptor in the liver. Our results provide new evidences regarding the molecular pathways through which empagliflozin could exert hepatoprotector beneficial effects in T2DM.
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highly connected to metabolic liver disease, that is a chronic condition that implies hepatic fat accumulation associated to underpinning metabolic dysregulation (Lim et al., 2021) and low-grade inflammation (; Watt et al., 2019; Lim et al., 2021). This complex and bidirectional association raises the possibility of common mechanisms of disease treatment (Vincent et al., 2020; ). With the increasing interest in the non-glycaemic effects of the pharmacological treatments used for diabetes control, several recent clinical trials and translational studies have explored the hepatic effects linked to the use of anti-diabetic drugs such as the analogues of glucagon-like peptide one or the sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (Ranjbar et al., 2019; ; ; Vincent et al., 2020). The SGLT2 inhibitors are new oral anti-diabetic agents that promote renal glucose excretion in an insulin-independent mechanism, being well established in the treatment of T2DM (). One of the four SGLT2 inhibitors approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is empagliflozin that, both in patients with or without T2DM, has demonstrated to have additional renoprotective and cardioprotective effects that are independent of the glycaemic control (Zinman et al., 2015; Täger et al., 2020). Although the pathways through which SGLT2 inhibitors exert those beneficial effects are still unknown, it has been widely suggested that energy metabolism regulation and reduction of inflammation could be two of the mechanisms more tightly implicated (; ; Verma and McMurray, 2018). Particularly, empagliflozin treatment has been shown to be able to reduce fat hepatic content in T2DM patients with fatty liver disease () and in animal models of diabetes-associated steatohepatitis (; Petito-da-Silva et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019).
We have demonstrated earlier that, in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats, the treatment with empagliflozin modifies the cardiac metabolome, greatly reducing the content of lipid species associated with cardiac lipotoxicity (). In the present work, we aimed to broaden our previous work to study the impact of this therapy on liver metabolome, as well as on the levels of inflammation in hepatic tissue.
Methods
All reagents and materials are from Sigma-Aldrich (United States) except where stated otherwise.
Ethical Statement
The study was performed in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines (Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) () and the European Union Directive 2010/63. The protocol used was approved by the Galician Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2007/304) (protocol number 15005/2015/003).
Animal Care
Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats (ZDF-Leprfa/fa) are a model of early stage T2DM with high insulin and glucose intolerance in liver and skeletal muscle (Shiota and Printz, 2012). Male ZDF-Leprfa/fa rats with a body weight ranging 200–250 g were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (United States). In order to induce T2DM, animals were fed ad libitum with the diabetogenic diet Formulab 5008 (LabDiet, United States) according to the supplier instructions, starting at 7-weeks of age. Rats were housed at the Animal House of the CiMUS (Centro Singular de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) under controlled room temperature (22 ± 2°C), relative humidity (40–5%) and illumination (12-h light/12-h dark cycle), with free access to chow and water.
Empagliflozin In Vivo Treatment
Once ZDF rats reached fasting glucose levels of 350.75 ± 18.59 mg/dl (12-weeks old), they were divided in 2 random groups: control (vehicle, mineral drinking water) (n = 15) and treated (30 mg/kg/d empagliflozin in the drinking water (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH&Co. KG, DEU)) (n = 15) (Steven et al., 2017; ). After 6 weeks of treatment, animals were euthanized and the livers (which were collected during 9:00 to 11:00 h) were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C until being shipped in dried ice to One Way Liver Metabolomics (OWL metabolomics S.L., ESP) for metabolomic analysis. Livers employed in the present study were harvested from the animals used in our previous work ().
Blood Glucose Measurement
Animal nourishments were retired at 20:00 h, and after 12 h of fasting, a blood sample from the tail vein was collected and measured using the glucometer GlucoDr auto™ (All Medicus Co. Ltd., KOR) once a week.
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
The hepatic gene expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6) (RefSeq NM_012,589.2), retinoic acid receptor responder 2 or chemerin (RARRES2) (RefSeq NM_001013427.1), chemerin chemokine-like receptor 1 (CMKLR1) (RefSeq NM_022,218.2) and 18S ribosomal RNA (18S) (RefSeq NR_046,237.1) as a housekeeping gene were determined by RT-qPCR. The NucleoSpin RNA Mini kit for RNA purification (Macherey-Nagel, DEU) was used to extract total RNA. Subsequently, the extracted RNA was measured in a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) to quantify and evaluate its purity. cDNA was synthetized performing a reverse transcription from 1 µg of RNA, using the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed using RT2 SYBR Green qPCR Mastermix and specific primers provided by Thermo Scientific using a Stratagene MX3000p thermocycler according to manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent Technologies, United States).
UHPLC-MS Metabolomics Determination
Liver metabolomics analysis (n = 10) was carried out by OWL Metabolomics S.L. (ESP) as previously described (; ). Briefly, two separate ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)−time-of-flight (TOF)-MS-based platforms for the analysis of methanol and chloroform/methanol extracts were linked to a UHPLC-single quadrupole-MS based platform to analyze amino acids and with a methanol/water extract platform that covered polar metabolites. Lipid nomenclature and classification follows the LIPID MAPS convention (www.lipidmaps.org).
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and significance was defined as p < 0.05. Comparisons between groups were analyzed with the non-parametric test Wilcoxon-signed rank test using the software GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). For gene expression analysis, the fold change vs. control in the expression of target genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
For metabolomics analysis, data were pre-processed using the TargetLynx application manager for MassLynx 4.1 (Waters Corp., USA). Intrabatch and interbatch normalization followed the protocol detailed in Martínez-Arranz et al., 2015. Statistical comparisons between groups were analyzed using the Student’s t-test and the software package R v.3.1.1 (R Development Core Team, 2011; AUT; https://cran.r-project.org/).
Results
Empagliflozin Effect on Glucose Lowering, Food Intake and Body Composition in Diabetic ZDF Rats
Empagliflozin treatment of diabetic ZDF rats starting at the onset of T2DM significantly decreased fasting glucose levels compared to control (115.9 ± 7.50 mg/dl and 400.9 ± 15.22 mg/dl respectively; p < 0.0001, n = 15) ().
Before starting the treatment, the rats in the control group weighted 251.1 ± 12.67 g and the empagliflozin group weighted 248.6 ± 13.34 g (p: 0.662, n = 15). After 6 weeks of treatment, we observed a slight increase in body weight in the empagliflozin group compared to control (415.8 ± 6.46 g and 387.2 ± 7.71 g respectively, p: 0.0076, n = 15), without affecting food intake. As well, fat distribution and muscle volume were unaltered after empagliflozin treatment compared to control ().
Plasma levels of triglycerides (control: 760.5 ± 66.83 mg/dl; empagliflozin: 752.7 ± 52.49 mg/dl; p: 0.808, n = 15), cholesterol (221.1 ± 6.96 mg/dl and 233.7 ± 7.70 mg/dl respectively; p: 0.268, n = 15), LDL (26.94 ± 1.43 mg/dl and 36.63 ± 7.80 mg/dl; p: 0.395, n = 15), HDL (88.31 ± 2.86 mg/dl and 87.44 ± 2.94 mg/dl; p: 0.689, n = 15), and the hepatic enzymes alanine transaminase (ALT) (160.7 ± 16.99 UI/L and 133.3 ± 14.81 UI/L; p: 0.243, n = 10) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (4.75 ± 1.11 UI/L and 2.60 ± 0.46 UI/L; p: 0.304, n = 15) were unaltered after empagliflozin treatment ().
We also determined if empagliflozin could affect liver weight by normalizing liver weight by whole body weight. We observed that empagliflozin did not affect liver weight compared to control rats (49.14 ± 0.99 mg/g and 48.55 ± 0.91 mg/g respectively; p: 0.555, n = 5).
Empagliflozin Effect on the Hepatic Metabolome in Diabetic ZDF Rats
A total of 400 metabolites were detected in the analyzed liver samples. Among these, 16 metabolites were found to be outliers and were excluded from the statistical analysis. The heatmap in Figure 1A displays the log2 (fold-change) of the 384 metabolites included in the study, showing that livers from rats treated with empagliflozin had higher levels of several amino acids (7), diglycerides (DG) (2), triglycerides (TG) (9), monoacylglycerophosphoethanolamines (4), diacylglycerophosphocholines (8), monoacylglycerophosphocholines (15) and lysophosphatidylinositols (LPI) (8). A volcano plot [-log10(p-value) vs. log2(fold-change)] was also generated for comparison between empagliflozin vs. control (Figure 1B). This volcano emphasizes the most significant altered metabolites considered individually for this comparison and complements the heatmap. Most of the altered metabolites were increased in treated rats compared to controls. Remarkably, all significantly increased glycerolipids (DG and TG) were monounsaturated or polyunsaturated species, while changes in saturated features were not found (Figure 1A and Figure 2). Changes in phosphatidylcholines (PC) were also relevant, reaching p-values < 0.001 for some of them. Only diacylglycerophosphocholines and monoacylglycerophosphocholines were significantly augmented (Figures 1A, 2). In contrast, ether-linked species were not altered with the treatment (1-ether, 2-acylglycerophosphocholines or 1-Monoetherglycerophosphocholine). We did not find any difference between control and empagliflozin-treated rats regarding total cholesterol (1.1 ± 0.6 relative intensity in arbitrary units (a.u.) and 1.05 ± 0.07 (a.u.) respectively; p: 0.554, n = 10) and total triglycerides (63.70 ± 5.38 (a.u.) and 54.01 ± 7.81 (a.u.); p: 0.320, n = 10) content in the liver.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
Regarding other metabolic species, increased levels of amino acids, a fatty acid, monoacylglycerophosphoethanolamines, succinate and xanthosine were found in livers from rats treated with empagliflozin (Figures 1A, 2). Only 3 metabolites were significantly decreased in this group (taurochenodeoxycholic acid, cytidine and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) compared to controls (Figure 2). In addition to the individual metabolites, we studied the changes in metabolic classes between empagliflozin-treated and control rats, calculated as the sum of the normalized areas of all the metabolites with the same chemical characteristics. Significantly altered metabolic classes for the comparison empagliflozin vs. control are summarized in Table 1, being the most relevant glycerophospholipids, especially monoacyl-species, and aromatic amino acids. Some of the biggest changes in the metabolic classes are represented in the boxplots shown in Figure 3A.
TABLE 1
 |
Significantly altered metabolic classes and enzyme ratios in liver from empagliflozin-treated rats compared to control rats. TG, triacylglycerides; FA, fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; MUFA, mono-unsaturated fatty acids; BCAAs, branched chain amino acids; ChoE, cholesteryl esters; Cho, cholesterol; PC, phosphatidylcholines; PE, phosphatidylethanolamines; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; SM, sphingomyelin.
FIGURE 3
Similarly, in order to know the potential enzyme activities related to hepatic lipid metabolism, we calculated several enzyme ratios (Table 1). We found the ratios (PC)/phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) PC/PE(16:0/20:4), PC/PE(16:0/22:6), PC/PE(18:0/20:4) and PC/PE(18:0/22:6) increased after empagliflozin treatment compared to controls, what may suggest that methylation by phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) could be increased in the livers of rats treated with empagliflozin (Table 1).
Empagliflozin Effect on Pro-inflammatory Markers in the Liver
Empagliflozin treatment induces a reduction on hepatic gene expression of the pro-inflammatory markers chemerin, chemerin receptor and IL-6 (Figure 3B) in diabetic ZDF rats compared to untreated controls.
Discussion
The most relevant result in our present work is the demonstration that the treatment with empagliflozin is able to modify the hepatic metabolome of male ZDF rats into a more favorable profile, and that this SGLT2 inhibitor is also able to decrease the gene expression of pro-inflammatory markers in the liver of those animals.
The ZDF rat is a model of T2DM well established, and it is also used as a model for the study of metabolic fatty liver disease (Shiota and Printz, 2012; ). In our work, we observed an increase in hepatic DG and TG species containing MUFAs and PUFAs after empagliflozin treatment of ZDF diabetic rat, whereas no changes in saturated species were found. Although hepatic glycerides can be raised in metabolic liver disease, increasing data show that the total quantity of TG accumulated in the hepatic cells is not the principal cause of lipotoxicity, and that are specific classes of lipids (mainly saturated forms) those that act as damaging agents (Svegliati-Baroni et al., 2019). Moreover, it has also been reported that usually MUFAs and PUFAs species are decreased in metabolic liver disease (; ; ). The acyl chain composition of DG and TG seems to be critical to determine the effects derived from their increase at hepatic level and, indeed, it has been recently demonstrated that glycerides that contain fatty acids that are longer and more unsaturated accumulate in larger amounts in the liver during adaptive thermogenesis, a process known to be linked to an improved metabolic profile (Stanford et al., 2013; ; ; Pernes et al., 2021). Moreover, it has been also proposed that an enrichment of MUFAs and PUFAs in hepatic non-toxic-TG pools can prevent the lipotoxicity and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress at hepatic level (). In concordance with this, Nasiri-Ansari et al. (2021) have recently demonstrated that empagliflozin is able to reduce the endoplasmic reticulum stress in the liver of ApoE(−/−) mice. To note, and in consonance with our data, Ueta et al. (2014) and O’Brien et al. (2017) have demonstrated that the treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was able to reduce the TG content of skeletal muscle, but not the hepatic TG content of ZDF rats; while Perakakis et al. (2021) recently reported an increase of the hepatic concentrations of TG in empagliflozin-treated non-diabetic mice with advanced steatohepatitis. The increase in hepatic DG and TG species containing MUFAs and PUFAs after empagliflozin treatment of ZDF diabetic rats might involve changes in the hepatic expression and/or activity of relevant enzymes in MUFA and PUFA biosynthesis, the Δ9, Δ5-and Δ6-fatty acid desaturases (Nakamura and Nara, 2004), whose levels and activity have been found altered in hepatic pathological conditions and in animal models of hepatic disease, and whose deficiency has been associated to liver metabolic diseases (; ; ; Palladini et al., 2019).
In our study, we observed that empagliflozin increases PC and PE hepatic content. Phospholipids play a pivotal role in regulating physiological functions and maintaining cellular membrane structures, integrity and fluidity, being PC and PE the most abundant at hepatocellular level (). Alterations in phospholipid composition can result in cell membranes damage, what has been strongly involved in the aetiology of chronic liver diseases (; Lüchtenborg et al., 2020). In agreement with this, a reduction in the content of PC in the liver has been associated with the development of hepatic steatosis (Niebergall et al., 2011). We also demonstrate here that empagliflozin is able to increase the PC/PE ratio in ZDF rats compared to untreated controls. Anomalous high or low PC/PE ratios in different tissues can affect energy metabolism and have been linked to metabolic disease progression (van der Veen et al., 2017; van der Veen et al., 2019). In the liver, the 70% of PC is generated via the cytidine diphosphate–choline pathway, while the enzyme PEMT accounts for ∼30% of hepatic PC biosynthesis through sequential methylation reactions of PE, and is critical for maintaining the phospholipid balance necessary for the preservation of a healthy liver (Niebergall et al., 2011; Wan et al., 2019). A reduction of the hepatic molar ratio PC/PE (considered a key regulator of cell membrane integrity whose alteration contributes to the development of metabolic hepatic disease) has been found in patients with fatty liver, and it has been associated with a decline in the activity of PEMT in some in vivo and in vitro conditions (; Wan et al., 2019; Lüchtenborg et al., 2020; Peng et al., 2021); but several other factors can modulate the ratio PC/PE at hepatic level: for example, it has been reported that the exposure to high levels of free fatty acids lowers hepatocyte PC/PE ratio mainly by increasing the cellular PE level, that was attributable to enhanced production via the cytidine diphosphate-ethanolamine pathway and less consumption via the PEMT pathway, with the latter pathway also producing less PC (Peng et al., 2021).
In our work, we found that empagliflozin treatment increases the hepatic content of 3 unsaturated and 3 polyunsaturated LPI contents (included arachidonic acid-containing LPI). To note, a reduction of arachidonic acid-containing species has been recently tightly associated to the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis and liver damage (; Thangapandi et al., 2021). This impairment in hepatic LPI metabolism would involve a reduction in the activity of a LPI acyltransferase (LPIAT1/MBOAT7, that belongs to the membrane-bound O-acyltransferase (MBOAT) family) implicated in the remodelling of phospholipid acyl-chain in the Land’s cycle, incorporating arachidonic acid and different PUFAs within LPI and several more lysophospholipids; thus, it is a fine-tune regulator of the amount of free arachidonic acid, that is a potent trigger for hepatic inflammation and fibrosis (; Thangapandi et al., 2021).
In this work, we show that empagliflozin treatment increases liver LPC levels in diabetic ZDF rats compared to untreated controls. Interestingly, elevated plasma levels of LPC in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver have been associated with anti-inflammatory and glucose-lowering effects, and with metabolically benign disease (), while decreased levels of LPC have been found in plasma of obese () and insulin-resistant (Rauschert et al., 2016) patients when compared to control individuals. Moreover, in overweight and obese individuals, insulin sensitivity in the muscle is linked to more elevated plasma LPC concentrations (van der Kolk et al., 2019). Since low LPC levels appear to be clearly a marker of metabolic liver disease-connected insulin resistance, our results may reveal novel significant beneficial mechanisms of action of empagliflozin in the liver. As also reported for LPI, it has been demonstrated that LPC are remodeled through the Land’s cycle, whose reacylation step is catalyzed in the liver by LPC acyltransferase 3 (LPCAT3), that belongs to the membrane-bound O-acyltransferase (MBOAT) family, and whose hepatic gene expression is regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα, nuclear receptor that regulates fatty acid oxidation and target genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism) agonists (Zhao et al., 2008). To note, it has been demonstrated that the treatment with empagliflozin is able to increase the hepatic expression of PPARα in high-fat-fed mice (Petito-da-Silva et al., 2019). Our study provides tools for future investigations on how LPI and LPC remodeling may potentially be involved in the hepatic effects of the treatment with empagliflozin in diabetes.
Regarding other metabolic features altered in the liver of ZDF rats by the treatment with empagliflozin, we would like to highlight the decrease in the hepatic content of taurochenodeoxycholic acid, a bile acid whose levels have been positively associated with liver injury (Ma et al., 2019) and cirrhosis in humans (Yang et al., 2019).
Inflammation is a common feature in metabolic disorders, including fatty liver disease (; ). The inflammation of adipose tissue and the insulin resistance drive to an overload of fatty acids and glucose in the liver that causes hepatic steatosis, ER stress and activation of the unfolded protein response, generating the activation of the inflammasome and the cell death (). Hepatocyte damage signals result in the activation of hepatic stellate and inflammatory cells that assemble hepatic fibrogenesis (). In our work we could confirm that empagliflozin induced in ZDF rats a drop in the hepatic gene expression of the inflammatory marker IL-6, what had been previously reported in mice models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with diabetes after treatment with this drug (; Nasiri-Ansari et al., 2021), Our results also show, for the first time, that empagliflozin is able to induce a significant decline in the hepatic gene expression both of the adipokine chemerin and of chemerin receptor. Chemerin is a pro-inflammatory adipokine produced by the white adipose tissue and by several other tissues, including the liver, that has been linked to obesity, insulin resistance, inflammation, and fatty liver disease (Su et al., 2021). Over the past decade chemerin, that was initially identified as a potent chemoattractant in different immune cells with pivotal roles in both innate and adaptive immunity, has increasingly emerged as a biomarker characterizing inflammatory and metabolic phenotypes, and linking low-grade inflammation with metabolic disorders (; ; ), having been proposed as an early marker of chronic subclinical inflammation (). In accordance to this, chemerin has been strongly associated with the pathogenesis and/or progression of hepatic metabolic dysfunction (; ; ).
To note, we have previously described a robust SGLT2 hepatic gene expression in both control and empagliflozin-treated ZDF rats, which is lower but comparable with its expression levels in kidney (). According to this, the metabolic effects of empagliflozin reported in our work might be induced by direct actions at hepatic level of this SGLT2 inhibitor. However, it cannot be ruled out that those effects could derive from the whole-body extensive metabolic changes induced by the treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors in conditions of obesity and diabetes.
In conclusion, the results of this work evidence that the treatment with empagliflozin is able to modify the hepatic metabolome of ZDF rats towards a protective profile, while diminishing the expression of pro-inflammatory molecules tightly involved in the physiopathology of liver metabolic disease. Since SGLT2 inhibitors seem to be an attractive therapeutic opportunity for metabolic liver disease management, these findings come in support of a beneficial effect for empagliflozin in the regulation of hepatic metabolism in a context of obesity and diabetes.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Galician Clinical Research Ethics Committee (study protocol number 15005/2015/003).
Author contributions
L-F designed the study. AH-A, OS-M, AV-L, MF-S, CT-M, GC-T and FB-S performed the experiments and collected the data. AH-A, FB-S, B-L, T-E, RL-E, P-M, G-O, M-I, L-R, GJ-JR and L-P contributed to analysis and interpretation of the data. FB-S and L-F wrote the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co., by the National Institute of Health “Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias del Instituto de Salud Carlos III” Madrid, Spain (PI15/00681, PI17/00409, PI18/00821, PI20/00902, RETICS Programme RD16/0012/0014 and CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV)); European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) and European Union framework MSCA-RISE-H2020 Programme (Project number 734899). AH-A was funded by predoctoral research grants from Xunta de Galicia and FPU Program of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Spain); MF-S was funded by the predoctoral research grants “Programa Científico do Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular e Enfermidades Crónicas (CiMUS) (Spain) and Xunta de Galicia; and AV-L was funded by the predoctoral research grant from the PFIS Program of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spain).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Aragón-HerreraA.Feijóo-BandínS.Otero SantiagoM.BarralL.Campos-ToimilM.Gil-LongoJ.et al (2019). Empagliflozin Reduces the Levels of CD36 and Cardiotoxic Lipids while Improving Autophagy in the Hearts of Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats. Biochem. Pharmacol.170, 113677. 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113677
2
ArayaJ.RodrigoR.PettinelliP.ArayaA. V.PoniachikJ.VidelaL. A. (2010). Decreased Liver Fatty Acid delta-6 and delta-5 Desaturase Activity in Obese Patients. Obesity (Silver Spring)18, 1460–1463. 10.1038/oby.2009.379
3
ArendtB. M.MaD. W.SimonsB.NoureldinS. A.TherapondosG.GuindiM.et al (2013). Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Associated with Lower Hepatic and Erythrocyte Ratios of Phosphatidylcholine to Phosphatidylethanolamine. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.38, 334–340. 10.1139/apnm-2012-0261
4
BarrJ.CaballeríaJ.Martínez-ArranzI.Domínguez-DíezA.AlonsoC.MuntanéJ.et al (2012). Obesity-dependent Metabolic Signatures Associated with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Progression. J. Proteome Res.11, 2521–2532. 10.1021/pr201223p
5
BarrJ.Vázquez-ChantadaM.AlonsoC.Pérez-CormenzanaM.MayoR.GalánA.et al (2010). Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Parallel Metabolic Profiling of Human and Mouse Model Serum Reveals Putative Biomarkers Associated with the Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. J. Proteome Res.9, 4501–4512. 10.1021/pr1002593
6
BarteltA.JohnC.SchaltenbergN.BerbéeJ. F. P.WorthmannA.CherradiM. L.et al (2017). Thermogenic Adipocytes Promote HDL Turnover and Reverse Cholesterol Transport. Nat. Commun.8, 15010. 10.1038/ncomms15010
7
BekaertM.VerhelstX.GeertsA.LapauwB.CaldersP. (2016). Association of Recently Described Adipokines with Liver Histology in Biopsy-Proven Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: a Systematic Review. Obes. Rev.17, 68–80. 10.1111/obr.12333
8
BiancoC.CasiratiE.MalvestitiF.ValentiL. (2021). Genetic Predisposition Similarities between NASH and ASH: Identification of New Therapeutic Targets. JHEP Rep.3, 100284. 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100284
9
BonnetF.ScheenA. J. (2018). Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Systemic and Tissue Low-Grade Inflammation: The Potential Contribution to Diabetes Complications and Cardiovascular Disease. Diabetes Metab.44, 457–464. 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.09.005
10
CanoA.AlonsoC. (2014). Deciphering Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease through Metabolomics. Biochem. Soc. Trans.42, 1447–1452. 10.1042/BST20140138
11
ChiappiniF.CoillyA.KadarH.GualP.TranA.DesterkeC.et al (2017). Metabolism Dysregulation Induces a Specific Lipid Signature of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Patients. Sci. Rep.7, 46658. 10.1038/srep46658
12
ChitrajuC.TrötzmüllerM.HartlerJ.WolinskiH.ThallingerG. G.LassA.et al (2012). Lipidomic Analysis of Lipid Droplets from Murine Hepatocytes Reveals Distinct Signatures for Nutritional Stress. J. Lipid Res.53, 2141–2152. 10.1194/jlr.M028902
13
CusiK. (2020). A Diabetologist's Perspective of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH): Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions. Liver Int.40 (Suppl. 1), 82–88. 10.1111/liv.14350
14
EichelmannF.SchulzeM. B.WittenbecherC.MenzelJ.WeikertC.di GiuseppeR.et al (2019). Chemerin as a Biomarker Linking Inflammation and Cardiovascular Diseases. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.73, 378–379. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.058
15
FloresE.Santos-GallegoC. G.Diaz-MejíaN.BadimonJ. J. (2018). Do the SGLT-2 Inhibitors Offer More Than Hypoglycemic Activity. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther.32, 213–222. 10.1007/s10557-018-6786-x
16
FramptonJ. E. (2018). Empagliflozin: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes. Drugs78, 1037–1048. 10.1007/s40265-018-0937-z
17
FuchsC. D.ClaudelT.KumariP.HaemmerleG.PollheimerM. J.StojakovicT.et al (2012). Absence of Adipose Triglyceride Lipase Protects from Hepatic Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Mice. Hepatology56, 270–280. 10.1002/hep.25601
18
FurmanD.CampisiJ.VerdinE.Carrera-BastosP.TargS.FranceschiC.et al (2019). Chronic Inflammation in the Etiology of Disease across the Life Span. Nat. Med.25, 1822–1832. 10.1038/s41591-019-0675-0
19
GastaldelliA.StefanN.HäringH.-U. (2021). Liver-targeting Drugs and Their Effect on Blood Glucose and Hepatic Lipids. Diabetologia64, 1461–1479. 10.1007/s00125-021-05442-2
20
GrefhorstA.van den BeukelJ. C.DijkW.SteenbergenJ.VoortmanG. J.LeeuwenburghS.et al (2018). Multiple Effects of Cold Exposure on Livers of Male Mice. J. Endocrinol.238, 91–106. 10.1530/JOE-18-0076
21
GromovskyA. D.SchugarR. C.BrownA. L.HelsleyR. N.BurrowsA. C.FergusonD.et al (2018). Δ-5 Fatty Acid Desaturase FADS1 Impacts Metabolic Disease by Balancing Proinflammatory and Proresolving Lipid Mediators. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.38, 218–231. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309660
22
HallZ.BondN. J.AshmoreT.SandersF.AmentZ.WangX.et al (2017). Lipid Zonation and Phospholipid Remodeling in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepatology65, 1165–1180. 10.1002/hep.28953
23
HeimerlS.FischerM.BaesslerA.LiebischG.SigruenerA.WallnerS.et al (2014). Alterations of Plasma Lysophosphatidylcholine Species in Obesity and Weight Loss. PLoS One9, e111348. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111348
24
HelferG.WuQ. F. (2018). Chemerin: a Multifaceted Adipokine Involved in Metabolic Disorders. J. Endocrinol.238, R79–R94. 10.1530/JOE-18-0174
25
IsmaielA.DumitraşcuD. L. (2019). Cardiovascular Risk in Fatty Liver Disease: The Liver-Heart Axis-Literature Review. Front. Med. (Lausanne)6, 202. 10.3389/FMED.2019.00202
26
JacenikD.FichnaJ. (2020). Chemerin in Immune Response and Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology. Clin. Chim. Acta504, 146–153. 10.1016/j.cca.2020.02.008
27
JojimaT.TomotsuneT.IijimaT.AkimotoK.SuzukiK.AsoY. (2016). Empagliflozin (An SGLT2 Inhibitor), Alone or in Combination with Linagliptin (A DPP-4 Inhibitor), Prevents Steatohepatitis in a Novel Mouse Model of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Diabetes. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr.8, 45–11. 10.1186/s13098-016-0169-x
28
KangY.ZhanF.HeM.LiuZ.SongX. (2020). Anti-inflammatory Effects of Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors on Atherosclerosis. Vascul Pharmacol.133-134, 106779. 10.1016/j.vph.2020.106779
29
KilkennyC.BrowneW.CuthillI. C.EmersonM.AltmanD. G. (2010). NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working GroupAnimal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments: the ARRIVE Guidelines. Br. J. Pharmacol.160, 1577–1579. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x
30
KoelmanL.ReichmannR.BörnhorstC.SchulzeM. B.WeikertC.BiemannR.et al (2021). Determinants of Elevated Chemerin as a Novel Biomarker of Immunometabolism: Data from a Large Population-Based Cohort. Endocr. Connect.10, 1200–1211. 10.1530/EC-21-0273
31
KotronenA.Seppänen-LaaksoT.WesterbackaJ.KiviluotoT.ArolaJ.RuskeepääA. L.et al (2009). Hepatic Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase (SCD)-1 Activity and Diacylglycerol but Not Ceramide Concentrations Are Increased in the Nonalcoholic Human Fatty Liver. Diabetes58, 203–208. 10.2337/db08-1074
32
KuceraO.CervinkovaZ. (2014). Experimental Models of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Rats. World J. Gastroenterol.20, 8364–8376. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8364
33
KuchayM. S.KrishanS.MishraS. K.FarooquiK. J.SinghM. K.WasirJ. S.et al (2018). Effect of Empagliflozin on Liver Fat in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial (E-LIFT Trial). Diabetes Care41, 1801–1808. 10.2337/dc18-0165
34
LeeY. A.FriedmanS. L. (2021). Inflammatory and Fibrotic Mechanisms in NAFLD-Implications for New Treatment Strategies. J. Intern. Med.291, 11–31. 10.1111/joim.13380
35
LehmannR.FrankenH.DammeierS.RosenbaumL.KantartzisK.PeterA.et al (2013). Circulating Lysophosphatidylcholines Are Markers of a Metabolically Benign Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver. Diabetes Care36, 2331–2338. 10.2337/dc12-1760
36
LénizA.GonzálezM.BesnéI.Carr-UgarteH.Gómez- GarcíaI.PortilloM. P. (2022). Role of Chemerin in the Control of Glucose Homeostasis. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.541, 111504. 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111504
37
LimS.KimJ. W.TargherG. (2021). Links between Metabolic Syndrome and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.32, 500–514. 10.1016/j.tem.2021.04.008
38
LüchtenborgC.NiederhausB.BrüggerB.PopovicB.FrickerG. (2020). Lipid Profiles of Five Essential Phospholipid Preparations for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Comparative Study. Lipids55, 271–278. 10.1002/lipd.12236
39
MaZ.WangX.YinP.WuR.ZhouL.XuG.et al (2019). Serum Metabolome and Targeted Bile Acid Profiling Reveals Potential Novel Biomarkers for Drug-Induced Liver Injury. Medicine (Baltimore)98, e16717. 10.1097/MD.0000000000016717
40
Martínez-ArranzI.MayoR.Pérez-CormenzanaM.MincholéI.SalazarL.AlonsoC.et al (2015). Enhancing Metabolomics Research through Data Mining. J. Proteomics127, 275–288. 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.01.019
41
NakamuraM. T.NaraT. Y. (2004). Structure, Function, and Dietary Regulation of delta6, delta5, and delta9 Desaturases. Annu. Rev. Nutr.24, 345–376. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.121803.063211
42
Nasiri-AnsariN.NikolopoulouC.PapoutsiK.KyrouI.MantzorosC. S.KyriakopoulosG.et al (2021). Empagliflozin Attenuates Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in High Fat Diet Fed ApoE(-/-) Mice by Activating Autophagy and Reducing ER Stress and Apoptosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 1–21. 10.3390/ijms22020818
43
NiebergallL. J.JacobsR. L.ChabaT.VanceD. E. (2011). Phosphatidylcholine Protects against Steatosis in Mice but Not Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1811, 1177–1185. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.06.021
44
O’BrienT. P.JenkinsE. C.EstesS. K.CastanedaA. V.UetaK.FarmerT. D.et al (2017). Correcting Postprandial Hyperglycemia in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats With an SGLT2 Inhibitor Restores Glucose Effectiveness in the Liver and Reduces Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle. Diabetes66, 1172–1184. 10.2337/db16-1410
45
PalladiniG.Di PasquaL. G.BerardoC.SicilianoV.RichelmiP.MannucciB.et al (2019). Fatty Acid Desaturase Involvement in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Rat Models: Oxidative Stress versus Metalloproteinases. Nutrients11, 799. 10.3390/nu11040799
46
PengK. Y.BarlowC. K.KammounH.MellettN. A.WeirJ. M.MurphyA. J.et al (2021). Stable Isotopic Tracer Phospholipidomics Reveals Contributions of Key Phospholipid Biosynthetic Pathways to Low Hepatocyte Phosphatidylcholine to Phosphatidylethanolamine Ratio Induced by Free Fatty Acids. Metabolites11, 188. 10.3390/METABO11030188
47
PerakakisN.ChrysafiP.FeighM.VeidalS. S.MantzorosC. S. (2021). Empagliflozin Improves Metabolic and Hepatic Outcomes in a Non-diabetic Obese Biopsy-Proven Mouse Model of Advanced NASH. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 6332. 10.3390/ijms22126332
48
PernesG.MorganP. K.HuynhK.MellettN. A.MeikleP. J.MurphyA. J.et al (2021). Characterization of the Circulating and Tissue-specific Alterations to the Lipidome in Response to Moderate and Major Cold Stress in Mice. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.320, R95–R104. 10.1152/ajpregu.00112.2020
49
Petito-da-SilvaT. I.Souza-MelloV.Barbosa-da-SilvaS. (2019). Empaglifozin Mitigates NAFLD in High-Fat-Fed Mice by Alleviating Insulin Resistance, Lipogenesis and ER Stress. Mol. Cel. Endocrinol.498, 110539. 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110539
50
RanjbarG.MikhailidisD. P.SahebkarA. (2019). Effects of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Steatohepatitis: Think Out of the Box!. Metabolism101, 154001. 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.154001
51
RauschertS.UhlO.KoletzkoB.KirchbergF.MoriT. A.HuangR. C.et al (2016). Lipidomics Reveals Associations of Phospholipids with Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Young Adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.101, 871–879. 10.1210/jc.2015-3525
52
ShiotaM.PrintzR. L. (2012). “Diabetes in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rat,” in Animal Models in Diabetes Research (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), 103–123. 10.1007/978-1-62703-068-7_8
53
StanfordK. I.MiddelbeekR. J.TownsendK. L.AnD.NygaardE. B.HitchcoxK. M.et al (2013). Brown Adipose Tissue Regulates Glucose Homeostasis and Insulin Sensitivity. J. Clin. Invest.123, 215–223. 10.1172/JCI62308
54
StevenS.OelzeM.HanfA.Kröller-SchönS.KashaniF.RoohaniS.et al (2017). The SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Improves the Primary Diabetic Complications in ZDF Rats. Redox Biol.13, 370–385. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.06.009
55
SuX.ChengY.ZhangG.WangB. (2021). Chemerin in Inflammatory Diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta517, 41–47. 10.1016/j.cca.2021.02.010
56
Svegliati-BaroniG.PierantonelliI.TorquatoP.MarinelliR.FerreriC.ChatgilialogluC.et al (2019). Lipidomic Biomarkers and Mechanisms of Lipotoxicity in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med.144, 293–309. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.05.029
57
TägerT.AtarD.AgewallS.KatusH. A.GrundtvigM.ClelandJ. G. F.et al (2020). Comparative Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i) for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Heart Fail. Rev.26, 1421–1435. 10.1007/s10741-020-09954-8
58
ThangapandiV. R.KnittelfelderO.BroschM.PatsenkerE.VvedenskayaO.BuchS.et al (2021). Loss of Hepatic Mboat7 Leads to Liver Fibrosis. Gut70, 940–950. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320853
59
UetaK.O’BrienT. P.McCoyG. A.KimK.HealeyE. C.FarmerT. D.et al (2014). Glucotoxicity Targets Hepatic Glucokinase in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats, a Model of Type 2 Diabetes Associated With Obesity. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.306, E1225–E1238. 10.1152/ajpendo.00507.2013
60
van der KolkB. W.VogelzangsN.JockenJ. W. E.ValsesiaA.HankemeierT.AstrupA.et al (2019). Plasma Lipid Profiling of Tissue-specific Insulin Resistance in Human Obesity. Int. J. Obes. (Lond)43, 989–998. 10.1038/s41366-018-0189-8
61
van der VeenJ. N.KennellyJ. P.WanS.VanceJ. E.VanceD. E.JacobsR. L. (2017). The Critical Role of Phosphatidylcholine and Phosphatidylethanolamine Metabolism in Health and Disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr.1859, 1558–1572. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.04.006
62
van der VeenJ. N.LingrellS.McCloskeyN.LeBlondN. D.GalleguillosD.ZhaoY. Y.et al (2019). A Role for Phosphatidylcholine and Phosphatidylethanolamine in Hepatic Insulin Signaling. FASEB J.33, 5045–5057. 10.1096/fj.201802117R
63
VermaS.McMurrayJ. J. V. (2018). SGLT2 Inhibitors and Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Benefit: a State-Of-The-Art Review. Diabetologia61, 2108–2117. 10.1007/s00125-018-4670-7
64
VincentR. K.WilliamsD. M.EvansM. (2020). A Look to the Future in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Are Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Analogues or Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors the Answer. Diabetes Obes. Metab.22, 2227–2240. 10.1111/dom.14196
65
WanS.van der VeenJ. N.Bakala N'GomaJ. C.NelsonR. C.VanceD. E.JacobsR. L. (2019). Hepatic PEMT Activity Mediates Liver Health, Weight Gain, and Insulin Resistance. FASEB J.33, 10986–10995. 10.1096/fj.201900679R
66
WattM. J.MiottoP. M.De NardoW.MontgomeryM. K. (2019). The Liver as an Endocrine Organ-Linking NAFLD and Insulin Resistance. Endocr. Rev.40, 1367–1393. 10.1210/er.2019-00034
67
XuL.NagataN.ChenG.NagashimadaM.ZhugeF.NiY.et al (2019). Empagliflozin Reverses Obesity and Insulin Resistance through Fat browning and Alternative Macrophage Activation in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care7, e000783. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000783
68
YangZ.KusumanchiP.RossR. A.HeathersL.ChandlerK.OshodiA.et al (2019). Serum Metabolomic Profiling Identifies Key Metabolic Signatures Associated with Pathogenesis of Alcoholic Liver Disease in Humans. Hepatol. Commun.3, 542–557. 10.1002/hep4.1322
69
ZhaoY.ChenY. Q.BonacciT. M.BredtD. S.LiS.BenschW. R.et al (2008). Identification and Characterization of a Major Liver Lysophosphatidylcholine Acyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem.283, 8258–8265. 10.1074/jbc.M710422200
70
ZinmanB.WannerC.LachinJ. M.FitchettD.BluhmkiE.HantelS.et al (2015). Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med.373, 2117–2128. 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720
Summary
Keywords
empagliflozin, diabetes, liver, metabolome, inflammation
Citation
Aragón-Herrera A, Otero-Santiago M, Anido-Varela L, Moraña-Fernández S, Campos-Toimil M, García-Caballero T, Barral L, Tarazón E, Roselló-Lletí E, Portolés M, Gualillo O, Moscoso I, Lage R, González-Juanatey JR, Feijóo-Bandín S and Lago F (2022) The Treatment With the SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Modifies the Hepatic Metabolome of Male Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats Towards a Protective Profile. Front. Pharmacol. 13:827033. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.827033
Received
09 December 2021
Accepted
04 January 2022
Published
02 February 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Guoxun Chen, The University of Tennessee, United States
Reviewed by
Hong-Ping Guan, Rezubio Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Aragón-Herrera, Otero-Santiago, Anido-Varela, Moraña-Fernández, Campos-Toimil, García-Caballero, Barral, Tarazón, Roselló-Lletí, Portolés, Gualillo, Moscoso, Lage, González-Juanatey, Feijóo-Bandín and Lago.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sandra Feijóo-Bandín, sandra.feijoo.bandin@sergas.es
† These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Pharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.