Abstract
The bromodomain and extra-terminal domain proteins (BETs) family serve as epigenetic “readers”, which recognize the acetylated histones and recruit transcriptional regulator complexes to chromatin, eventually regulating gene transcription. Accumulating evidences demonstrate that pan BET inhibitors (BETi) confer protection against pathological cardiac hypertrophy, a precursor progress for developing heart failure. However, the roles of BET family members, except BRD4, remain unknown in pathological cardiac hypertrophy. The present study identified BRD2 as a novel regulator in cardiac hypertrophy, with a distinct mechanism from BRD4. BRD2 expression was elevated in cardiac hypertrophy induced by β-adrenergic agonist isoprenaline (ISO) in vivo and in vitro. Overexpression of BRD2 upregulated the expression of hypertrophic biomarkers and increased cell surface area, whereas BRD2 knockdown restrained ISO-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. In vivo, rats received intramyocardial injection of adeno-associated virus (AAV) encoding siBRD2 significantly reversed ISO-induced pathological cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis, and cardiac function dysregulation. The bioinformatic analysis of whole-genome sequence data demonstrated that a majority of metabolic genes, in particular those involved in TCA cycle, were under regulation by BRD2. Real-time PCR results confirmed that the expressions of TCA cycle genes were upregulated by BRD2, but were downregulated by BRD2 silencing in ISO-treated cardiomyocytes. Results of mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and ATP production measurement demonstrated that BRD2 augmented cardiac metabolism during cardiac hypertrophy. In conclusion, the present study revealed that BRD2 could facilitate cardiac hypertrophy through upregulating TCA cycle genes. Strategies targeting inhibition of BRD2 might suggest therapeutic potential for pathological cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.
Introduction
Epigenetic modifications refer to dynamic and reversible changes in chromatin accessibility and post-translational modifications of histone tails, without altering nucleotide sequence (). As the earliest and most in-depth studied epigenetic modification, histone acetylation plays important roles in chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation (Scher et al., 2007). Not only governed by the “writer” histone acetyltransferases and the “eraser” histone deacetylases, histone acetylation also relies on “readers”, which are acetyl-binding proteins recognizing the acetylated lysine in histones and recruiting transcriptional regulator complexes to chromatin, eventually regulating gene transcription (Wang et al., 2021). Nearly all known “epigenetic readers” contain bromodomains, which are about 110-amino-acid modules found in many chromatin-associated proteins (Scher et al., 2007). The bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) family, consisting of four proteins (namely BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDT), is a subfamily of bromodomain-containing proteins (BRDs) designated because of the presence of two bromodomains along with an additional region of homology called ET domain (). BET members are implicated in a majority of diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus infection (; Sharma et al., 2013), inflammatory diseases (), carcinogenesis (; ), etc.
Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is characterized by enlargement of the heart and thickening of ventricular walls due to sustain and abnormal hemodynamic stress. Although it is initially an adaptive response to maintain cardiac function, prolonged cardiac hypertrophy exacerbates heart workload and facilitates the onset of heart failure (Tham et al., 2015). Maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy is also an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (Tham et al., 2015). Therefore, interventions to prevent pathological cardiac hypertrophy are in urgent need. Accumulating evidences demonstrate that BET inhibitors (BETi) exhibit protective effects against pathological cardiac hypertrophy. A pan-BETi, JQ1, ameliorates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in mice (Spiltoir et al., 2013). Another BETi, apabetalone (RVX-208), improves the cardiovascular outcomes of patients with diabetes after acute coronary syndrome, suggesting its therapeutic potential for cardiovascular diseases (Ray et al., 2019). Among the four BET family members, BRD4 has been widely reported to be involved in regulation of cardiac hypertrophy (Van der Feen et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2020; ). However, the roles of other BET members in pathological cardiac hypertrophy remain unclear. Considering the broad effects of pan-BET, the possible involvement of other BET members could not be ignored. In our preliminary studies, we measured the mRNA levels of BET members in a cardiomyocyte hypertrophy model induced by β-adrenergic receptor activation. BRD2 was remarkably elevated at the transcriptional level in parallel with BRD4, suggesting that BRD2 is probably associated with the pathological progression of cardiac hypertrophy ().
BRD2 and BRD4 share similar structure, with about 80% identity at the amino acid level in human and mouse. The only difference is that BRD4 has a distinct longer C-terminal domain (CTD), which can facilitate transcription reactivation and elongation by recruiting and interacting with the positive-transcriptional elongation factor b (P-TEFb), while BRD2 does not have such structure (; Taniguchi 2016). With its CTD function, BRD4 enhances the recruitment of P-TEFb, which phosphorylates Ser2 of RNA Pol II and promotes transcriptional pause release of Pol II (Spiltoir et al., 2013; Stratton and McKinsey 2015). However, it is still uncertain about the exact biological functions of BET family members without CTD, such as BRD2 and BRD3 (). Some studies indicate that the main role of BRD2/3 might be to remodel the promoters and enhancers to activate the transcriptional initiation process, whereas BRD4 is primarily involved in transcription elongation (; ).
Considering the existent structural and functional differences between BRD2 and BRD4, it raises our interests to explore the role of BRD2 in cardiovascular diseases. In view of this, the present study attempted to determine the regulatory effect of BRD2 in pathological cardiac hypertrophy, and to explore the possible underlying mechanisms.
Materials and Methods
Primary Culture of Cardiomyocytes
Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCMs) were isolated from hearts of 1–3 day old Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats as described previously (). The cardiomyocytes were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, United States) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 0.1 mM 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, United States) and cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2. H9c2 cells purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) were cultured under the same conditions but without BrdU. Cells were incubated with ISO (isoprenaline, MedChemExpress, NJ, United States, 10 μM final concentration) for 12 h to stimulate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
Animal Experiments
The animal experiments were conducted following the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996) and were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University. Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (male, 180–220 g, SPF grade, Certification No. 1100112011043685) were purchased from and housed in the Experimental Animal Center of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China). Rats were housed in a temperature-controlled room (21–23°C) with a 12 h daylight/dark cycles and had free access to chow and water. A total of 60 rats were randomly divided into four groups, namely NS, NS+ISO, AAV-siBRD2, AAV-siBRD2+ISO group. For AAV affection, adeno-associated virus encoding siBRD2 (AAV-siBRD2, 1012 particles) or negative control (AAV-siNC, 1012 particles) were offered by intramyocardial injection, followed by subcutaneous injection of ISO (1.2 mg/kg/d) or an equal volume of normal saline (NS) for 7 days.
Echocardiography and Histological Analysis
Rats were anaesthetized with 3% (v/v) isoflurane, and two-dimensional-guided M-mode echocardiography was performed with Technos MPX ultrasound system (Esaote, Genoa, Italy) as described in our previous reports (). Cardiac function indexes, including the ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) were measured. Afterwards, all animals were sacrificed. The hearts were then quickly removed, weighed and then used for other measurements. The upper portion of hearts were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and then embedded in paraffin for morphometric measurement.
Small Interference RNA and Plasmid Transfection
siRNA (small interfering RNA) against BRD2 (siBRD2) and negative control (NC) were obtained from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Plasmid that expresses BRD2 was purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) with Opti-MEM® I Reduced-Serum Medium (Gibco) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were incubated with mixture for 5 h and replaced with normal culture media. The expression of mRNA and protein were measured after 48 h by qRT-PCR or Western blot analysis.
Western Blot
Cells or myocardial tissue were washed for 3 times with cold PBS, following by extraction with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Nantong, Jiangsu, China) supplemented with protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (Bimake, Houston, TX, United States) on ice. Cell lysates were obtained by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C. After quantification using BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 30 μg of the lysates were boiled for 5 min in loading buffer at 90°C and subsequently separated in SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes and were then incubated by primary antibodies for 16 h at 4°C, followed by 1 h of secondary antibodies incubation at room temperature. The signals of protein level were visualized by Image Quant LAS 4000 mini (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States). The intensities of the blots were quantified by the Quantity One (Bio-Rad, California, United States) software. α-tubulin or GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) were used as internal references.
Antibodies against BRD2 (bromodomain containing 2, Cat# A302-583A-M) were from Bethyl; anti-α-tubulin (Cat# 66031-1-IG) and GAPDH (Cat# 60004-1-IG) were obtained from Proteintech; anti-ANF (atrial natriuretic factor, Cat# PAA225Ra02) was bought from Cloud-Clone Corp. Normal HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from cell Signaling Technology. Each antibody was used at the recommended dilution.
RNA Extraction and RT-PCR Quantification
Total RNA was isolated from NRCMs or myocardial tissue by TRIzol Reagent (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 1–5 μg of total RNA was reversed and transcripted into first-strand cDNA using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then, 1 μl cDNA, together with 1 μl of primer, 3 μl DEPC water and 5 μl SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (Toyobo Life Science, Osaka, Japan), were infused into one well of 96-well white plate and undergone relative quantitative RT-PCR analysis using LightCycler480 II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Data were normalized to β-Actin. The relative expression level was determined by 2−ΔΔCt method. The following primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and synthesized by Sangon Biotech.
Measurement of Cell Surface Area
Cardiomyocytes seeded in 48-well plates were washed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Cells were then incubated in 0.03% Triton X-100 for 15 min. After incubation with 0.1% rhodamine phalloidin (Invitrogen) for 1h, the cells were washed with PBS and further stained with DAPI (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, United States) for 10 min. All treatments were conducted at room temperature. The cells were then assessed with in High Content Screening System (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 25 randomly selected fields were chosen for analysis by built-in image analysis software.
RNA Sequence Analysis
Total RNAs of NRCMs were extracted as previous described and 10 μg total RNA of each sample was diluted in sterile and RNase-free water. Total 12 samples (3 duplicates for each group) were analyzed by BGI·Tech (Shenzhen, China). The mRNA was firstly enriched by magnetic beads bound with Oligo dT and then fragmented under high temperature conditions. The fragmented mRNA was used as template to synthesize one-strand cDNA, and then configure a two-strand synthesis reaction system to synthesize two-strand cDNA. After purification, end repairment, addition of base “A” to the 3’end of the cDNA and adapter connection, the product was finally amplified by PCR and sequenced. Bowtie2 software was used to map the clean reads to the reference genome (GCF_000001895.5_Rnor_6.0) (). Gene expression levels of each sample were quantified by RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase per Million mapped reads) (). Totally 2371 genes overlapped in “BRD2-vs-CON” and “siBRD2+ISO-vs-ISO” group were used for GSEA analysis (Subramanian et al., 2005). Differential gene expression was assessed with DESeq2 R package, genes with an adjusted P value (Q value) ≤ 0.05 were considered to be differentially expressed (). The raw data have been deposited in the SRA database of NCBI (SRA accession: PRJNA830755).
Measurement of Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption Rate
OCR measurement was performed using an XF96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA, United States) with Seahorse XFp Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (Seahorse Bioscience) as described previously (). Briefly, H9c2 cells were seeded into Seahorse XF96 microplates in a density of 2×104 cells/well. For detection, the normal medium of the cells was replaced with XF assay medium containing 1 mM pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine and 10 mM glucose, and then incubated in 37°C/non-CO2 incubator for 1 h. The sensor cartridge was loaded with various compounds as follows: oligomycin (10 μM of final concentration), carbonyl cyanide 4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP, 20 μM of final concentration) and rotenone/antimycin A (5 μM of final concentration), and then calibrated in the analyzer. The protein content quantified by BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in each well was used for normalization. The data were analyzed with Wave software, and respiratory parameters were quantified. Every group was repeated with six duplicates.
Measurement of Intracellular ATP Levels
ATP in the cell lysates was measured using a luciferase-based assay according to the manufacturer’s instruments (Beyotime). Data were normalized to total protein concentration of the cell lysate as determined by BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Statistical Analyses
Data were expressed as average ± standard error of mean (SEM) of at least four independent experiments. Unpaired t test was used to determine differences between two groups. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test was used to determine differences among multiple groups. p < 0.05 was regarded to be statistically significant.
Results
Bromodomain Containing Protein 2 Expression was Elevated in ISO-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Activation of β-adrenergic receptor induces calcium overload and oxygen free radical damage to cardiomyocytes, finally inducing cardiac hypertrophy (). In the present study, the classic β-adrenergic agonist isoprenaline (ISO) was used to stimulate cardiac hypertrophy. In vivo, 1.2 mg/kg/day of ISO was subcutaneously injected to SD rats for 7 days to induce cardiac hypertrophy. As shown in Figures 1A–D, these ISO-treated rats exhibited enlargement of heart size, thickening of left ventricular wall recorded by echocardiography, increased mRNA and protein expressions of hypertrophic biomarkers atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). In these ISO-induced cardiac hypertrophic rats, BRD2 expression was upregulated at both transcriptional and translational levels (Figures 1C,D). In vitro, NRCMs were incubated with 10 μM ISO to induce cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Consistent with the in vivo observations, the mRNA and protein expression of BRD2 were elevated by ISO in a time-dependent manner, in parallel with the increase of ANF and BNP expressions (Figures 1E,F). These results thus imply the possible involvement of BRD2 in ISO-induced pathological cardiac hypertrophy.
FIGURE 1
Bromodomain Containing Protein 2 Facilitated Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy
To investigate the exact role of BRD2 in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, BRD2 was overexpressed by plasmid transfection, or knocked down by small interfering RNA (siBRD2, Supplementary Figure S1) in NRCMs. Overexpression of BRD2 elevated the mRNA and protein expression of hypertrophic biomarkers, and increased the cell surface area as indicated by rhodamine-phalloidin staining, suggesting that BRD2 could facilitate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (Figures 2A–C). On the contrary, BRD2 knockdown restrained ISO-induced upregulation of ANF and BNP (Figures 2D,E), as well as expansion of cell surface area (Figure 2F). Taken together, these results suggest that BRD2 exerts pro-hypertrophic effects in cardiomyocytes, and that repression of BRD2 might help to ameliorate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
FIGURE 2
Bromodomain Containing Protein 2 Knockdown Protected Sprague–Dawley Rats Against ISO-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
We further evaluated the potential effect of BRD2 knockdown in rats with pathological cardiac hypertrophy. SD rats received intramyocardial injection of adeno-associated virus (AAV) encoding siBRD2, with NC as control, followed by subcutaneous injection of ISO (1.2 mg/kg/d) or an equal volume of normal saline (NS) for 7 days. Rats infected with AAV-siBRD2 significantly reversed ISO-induced heart enlargement by morphological observation and H&E staining (Figures 3A,B), disorder of myocardial cell arrangement (Figure 3B), interstitial fibrosis by PSR staining (Figure 3C), thickening of the left ventricle (LV) wall detected by ECG (Figure 3D), increase of heart weight/body weight (HW/BW, Figure 3E) and heart weight/tibia length (HW/TL, Figure 3F), as well as cardiac function dysregulation which is characterized by increase of ejection fraction (EF, Figure 3G) and fractional shortening (FS, Figure 3H). In addition, BRD2 knockdown suppressed ISO-induced upregulation of ANF (Figure 3I). Therefore, these in vivo findings confirm that BRD2 ablation confers protection against pathological cardiac hypertrophy.
FIGURE 3
Transcriptome Analysis Revealed That Bromodomain Containing Protein 2 Participated in the Regulation of Genes Related to Cell Metabolism
To explore the possible mechanisms of BRD2 in regulation of cardiac hypertrophy, we conducted RNA sequencing analysis to investigate the transcriptome changes in NRCMs with BRD2 overexpression or silencing, in the presence or absence of ISO. Using Q value (adjusted P value) ≤ 0.05 and |log2 fold change (FC)|>0.5 as the cutoff values, totally 1654 genes are differentially expressed between BRD2 overexpression and control group, while 2665 genes are differentially expressed between siBRD2+ISO and ISO group (Figure 4A). In these two gene sets, 704 genes were overlapped (Figure 4A). Among these genes, 314 genes showed opposite expression tendency in the above two gene sets, with 281 elevated in “BRD2-vs-CON” while decreased in “siBRD2+ISO-vs-ISO,” and 33 decreased in “BRD2-vs-CON” while increased in “siBRD2+ISO-vs-ISO” (Figure 4B). The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of these 314 genes found that metabolic pathways, including fatty acid metabolism, glycosphingolipid biosynthesis and citrate cycle (TCA cycle) were part of the most important enriched pathways (Figure 4C). Heatmaps of RNA-seq data demonstrated that a variety of genes associated with fatty acid metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis or TCA cycle were upregulated in “BRD2-vs-CON,” but downregulated in “siBRD2+ISO-vs-ISO” (Figure 4D). GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) revealed that hub genes differentially expressed between BRD2 overexpression and control were mainly enriched in “TCA cycle” (Figure 4E). These data thus hint that BRD2 might participate in the regulation of cardiomyocyte energy metabolism, in particular TCA cycle.
FIGURE 4
Bromodomain Containing Protein 2 Modulated TCA Cycle Genes and Energy Production Process and Thus Contributed to ISO-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
To further validate whether or not BRD2 is a key regulator of TCA cycle in cardiomyocytes, we measured the expressions of TCA cycle genes. Firstly, the gene expressions of TCA cycle proteins were compared between cardiomyocytes transfected with BRD2 plasmid or BRD2 siRNA. As shown in Figure 5A, a majority of TCA cycle genes, such as citrate synthase (CS), aconitase 2 (Aco2), isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2), oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH), succinyl CoA synthetase SUCLG1, succinate dehydrogenase SDHb, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2 (PCK2), malate dehydrogenases MDH1 and MDH2, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD), and dihydrolipoamide S-Acetyltransferase (DLAT), were significantly upregulated by BRD2 overexpression, but were downregulated by BRD2 silencing. Secondly, the expressions of these TCA cycle genes were studied in ISO-treated hypertrophic cardiomyocytes with or without BRD2 knockdown. The results demonstrated that the expressions of the above TCA cycle genes were augmented following ISO treatment, but were suppressed when BRD2 was knocked down (Figure 5B). Therefore, these results suggest that BRD2 is involved in the regulation of genes covered important and irreversible reactions in TCA cycle, as shown in the schematic (Figure 5C). Furthermore, the mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was evaluated to confirm the effect of BRD2 in the regulation of cardiac energy metabolism. Upregulation of BRD2 induced elevation of OCR, whereas BRD2 deficiency prevented ISO-induced elevation of OCR (Figure 5D). In line with these observations, BRD2 overexpression promoted ATP production while BRD2 knockdown restrained ATP production (Figure 5E). Taken in conjunction, these results suggest that BRD2 facilitates the increased energy production in response to ISO stimulation, leading to enlargement of cardiomyocytes and cardiac remodeling. Repression or inhibition of BRD2 might help to ameliorate these processes and prevent the development of cardiac hypertrophy.
FIGURE 5
Discussion
Epigenetic “reader” BETs recognize acetylated lysine residues and recruit transcriptional complexes to initiate target gene transcription, so that exhibit critical importance in the regulation of cellular events (; ; ; Wang et al., 2021). We and others have reported that inhibition of BETs using pharmacological inhibitors like JQ-1 could protect against a variety of cardiovascular diseases, such as cardiac hypertrophy, atherosclerosis, angiogenesis, intimal hyperplasia, and pulmonary arterial hypertension (Spiltoir et al., 2013; Stratton and McKinsey 2015; ). Most of these studies have revealed that BRD4 is a key regulator contributing to the development of cardiovascular diseases. However, the role of other BET family members is not fully understood. In this study, we revealed that BRD2 exerted pro-hypertrophic effects via regulating cardiac energy metabolism, thus expanding our understanding of BETs in cardiovascular diseases.
The conclusion that BRD2 has a detrimental role in exacerbating pathological cardiac hypertrophy is based on the following observations: 1) expression of BRD2 was upregulated in ISO-induced pathological cardiac hypertrophy both in vivo and in vitro; 2) overexpression of BRD2 facilitated the pathogenesis of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy; 3) knockdown of BRD2 prevented ISO-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy; and 4) rats infected with AAV-siBRD2 ameliorated ISO-induced cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac fibrosis, and dysregulation of cardiac function. These findings thus suggest that inhibition of BRD2 is a potential strategy for treating pathological cardiac hypertrophy, and that the therapeutic potential of pan-BETi in cardiovascular diseases is at least partially attributed to BRD2 inhibition.
Mechanistically, the pro-hypertrophic effects of BRD2 are probably due to elevation of cardiac energy metabolism, taken into considerations that a series of metabolic genes were upregulated by BRD2 in the cardiomyocytes. Since the heart has a perpetually high energy demand to sustain contractile function, cardiac metabolic remodeling, referred to the disturbed substrate metabolism and abnormal mitochondrial function, is a hallmark of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure (; ). In most cases, the disturbance of cardiac metabolism is associated with abnormal expression and/or activity of metabolic enzymes during the pathological development of cardiac hypertrophy (van Bilsen et al., 2004; ). Indeed, our data revealed that the mRNA levels of a majority of metabolic genes, in particular those involved in TCA cycle, were augmented in ISO-induced cardiac hypertrophy, which is most likely at the compensated stage of cardiac hypertrophy since EF was increased and the basal ventricular systolic function was preserved (). These observations are in line with previous reports that ISO treatment increased the levels of TCA cycle intermediates citrate, cis-aconitate and glutamine (), and that mitochondria citrate formation through PDH and citrate release were both increased in the hearts of 15 week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) (Vincent et al., 2003; ). However, the increased expression of TCA cycle genes and improved energy production in the compensated phase could not retard the development of cardiac hypertrophy, but rather increases burden of the heart and leads to cardiac overload, eventually progressing to the decompensated stage and resulting to irreversible heart failure. The bioinformatic analysis of whole-genome sequence data demonstrated that the pro-hypertrophic effects of BRD2 was primarily due to upregulation of metabolic genes, including those involved in fatty acid metabolism, glucose metabolism and TCA cycle. By contrast, BRD2 knockdown abolished ISO-induced upregulation of those metabolic genes. Particularly, genes involved in the regulation of TCA cycle, the major downstream of fatty acid metabolism and glucose metabolism of the heart for substrate utilization and ATP production (van Bilsen et al., 2004), were identified to be important downstream target genes of BRD2. In fact, our findings about the regulatory role of BRD2 in expressions of metabolic enzymes are in line with several studies. BRD2 participates in fatty acid metabolism via altering the expression of acetyl-CoA carboxylases-α gene (ACACA), fatty acid synthase (FAS) and hormone sensitive lipase (HSL) (; Sun et al., 2017), in glucose metabolism via activating phosphofructokinase PFKP and enforcing Warburg effect (Xu et al., 2021), as well as in cholesterol deprivation via occupying the gene promoter of sigma-2 receptor (S2R) with SREBP2 (Shen et al., 2021). Consistent with results of OCR and ATP production, these findings confirm that BRD2 facilitates cardiac hypertrophy via regulating energy metabolism.
It remains unclear how BRD2 regulates the expression of metabolic genes during cardiac hypertrophy. As an important member of BET family, BRD2 can initiate the transcriptional activation process together with BRD3, by promoting RNA Pol II elongation in transcription through their histone chaperone activities that are attributed to interaction between bromodomains and acetylated chromatin (Taniguchi 2016). Thus, it is possible that BRD2 might act as a transcriptional co-activator to modulate the expression of metabolic genes. Indeed, BRD2 could interact with several transcription factors such as SREBP2, Yin Yang 1, PPAR-γ and C/EBPα, to co-occupy a majority of gene-regulatory elements and coactivate downstream target metabolic genes (; ; Shen et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021). For this reason, BRD2 has attracted increasing attention for its critical role in regulation of cellular metabolism and metabolic diseases (Wang et al., 2009; ; Zong et al., 2019).
Notably, BRD2 shares close similarity in structure and physiological role with BRD4 (), which is well-accepted to be a nodal regulator of cardiac hypertrophy (Van der Feen et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2020; ). However, BRD4 possesses a longer CTD with a unique function that could facilitate the recruitment of P-TEFb complex to promote transcriptional elongation of hypertrophic genes, finally contributing to cardiac hypertrophy (; Spiltoir et al., 2013). Thus, the lack of long CTD in BRD2 might exclude the possibility that BRD2 regulates cardiac hypertrophy in a similar mechanism as BRD4. In fact, growing evidences have illustrated that BET family members coordinate with each other in a hierarchical manner rather than simply acting in a redundant manner (). For example, BRD2 and BRD3 coordinate to function in the initiated stage of transcriptional activation, while BRD4 functions in a later stage of transcription such as Pol II elongation (); BRD2 has the highest percentage of peaks at intronic and inter-genic regions, while BRD4 has the highest percentage of peaks at promoter regions (Zheng et al., 2021); loss of BRD2 reduces enhancer activity while BRD4 ablation enhances transcriptional pausing (Zheng et al., 2021); depletion of BRD2 or BRD3 results in transcriptional changes that are distinct from those caused by BRD4 depletion (Werner et al., 2020). For metabolic genes, a previous report has demonstrated that inhibition of BRD2, but not BRD4, increases fatty acid oxidation (). Therefore, the present findings that BRD2 regulates cardiac metabolism might elucidate a unique mechanism of BET family in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy, in addition to that of BRD4 with the function of long CTD. However, the present data did not allow to speculate whether the regulatory mechanism of BRD2 and BRD4 in cardiac hypertrophy are connected or not.
Intriguingly, the roles of BET family members in different cardiac hypertrophic models remain to be controversial. In NRCMs stimulated by α1 receptor agonist phenylephrine or in mice induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC), the expressions of all the BET family members remain unchanged () or with BRD4 upregulated only (Spiltoir et al., 2013), inconsistent with our observations that both BRD2 and BRD4 were upregulated in ISO-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Additionally, the present findings do not support the observations in a previous study showing that the hypertrophic effect of BET family were mediated by BRD4 but not BRD2 and/or BRD3 in response to phenylephrine or endothelin-1 (). It is still unclear the exact reason leading to the discrepancy between these findings. Probably, these controversial results are due to the differences of pro-hypertrophic signaling activated by different stimuli.
Currently, a number of BETi are undergoing clinical research and most of them, including JQ-1, ABBV-075, and OTX015, target at bromodomains (; ). By binding at the bromodomains, whether single or both, BETi displace BETs from its location on histone tails, disrupting the assembled transcriptional scaffolding and blocking expression of BET-controlled target genes (). Owing to the conservation of bromodomains, the classic BETi could hardly suppress BETs with subtype specificity. The present results that BRD2 exerted pro-hypertrophic effects in cardiomyocytes, apart from the previously reported BRD4, might help to explain the promising effect of pan-BETi in treatment of pathological cardiac hypertrophy, rather than specific inhibitor of a single BET member.
In conclusion, the present study identified BRD2 as a novel regulator of pathological cardiac hypertrophy, which could facilitate cardiac hypertrophy through upregulating gene expression of cardiac metabolic enzymes in particular those in TCA cycle. Strategies targeting inhibition of BRD2 might suggest therapeutic potential for pathological cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/, PRJNA830755.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Sun Yat-Sen University.
Author contributions
ZmL, PqL, ZrL, and ZzL conceived and coordinated the study. ZmL, ZrL, and ZzL conceived and designed the experiments. ZrL, ZzL, ZG, YjC, and JyL performed or analyzed the experiments. ZmL and ZrL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The study is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973318, 82003746, and 81872860), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019A1515011256), Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (2017BT01Y093), National Engineering and Technology Research Center for New drug Druggability Evaluation (Seed Program of Guangdong Province, 2017B090903004), and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Construction Foundation (2017B030314030).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2022.887991/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AnandP.BrownJ. D.LinC. Y.QiJ.ZhangR.ArteroP. C.et al (2013). BET Bromodomains Mediate Transcriptional Pause Release in Heart Failure. Cell154 (3), 569–582. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.013
2
BagchiR. A.FergusonB. S.StrattonM. S.HuT.CavasinM. A.SunL.et al (2018). HDAC11 Suppresses the Thermogenic Program of Adipose Tissue via BRD2. JCI Insight3 (15), e120159. 10.1172/jci.insight.120159
3
BelkinaA. C.DenisG. V. (2012). BET Domain Co-regulators in Obesity, Inflammation and Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer12 (7), 465–477. 10.1038/nrc3256
4
BelkinaA. C.NikolajczykB. S.DenisG. V. (2013). BET Protein Function Is Required for Inflammation: Brd2 Genetic Disruption and BET Inhibitor JQ1 Impair Mouse Macrophage Inflammatory Responses. J. Immunol.190 (7), 3670–3678. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202838
5
BholaN. E.NjatchaC.HuL.LeeE. D.ShiahJ. V.KimM. O.et al (2021). PD-L1 Is Upregulated via BRD2 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Models of Acquired Cetuximab Resistance. Head. Neck43, 3364–3373. 10.1002/hed.26827
6
BoehmD.CalvaneseV.DarR. D.XingS.SchroederS.MartinsL.et al (2013). BET Bromodomain-Targeting Compounds Reactivate HIV from Latency via a Tat-independent Mechanism. Cell Cycle12 (3), 452–462. 10.4161/cc.23309
7
BorckP. C.GuoL. W.PlutzkyJ. (2020). BET Epigenetic Reader Proteins in Cardiovascular Transcriptional Programs. Circ. Res.126 (9), 1190–1208. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.315929
8
BravermanN. E.D'AgostinoM. D.MacleanG. E. (2013). Peroxisome Biogenesis Disorders: Biological, Clinical and Pathophysiological Perspectives. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev.17 (3), 187–196. 10.1002/ddrr.1113
9
CaiS.WangP.XieT.LiZ.LiJ.LanR.et al (2020). Histone H4R3 Symmetric Di-methylation by Prmt5 Protects against Cardiac Hypertrophy via Regulation of Filip1L/β-Catenin. Pharmacol. Res.161, 105104. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105104
10
DeeneyJ. T.BelkinaA. C.ShirihaiO. S.CorkeyB. E.DenisG. V. (2016). BET Bromodomain Proteins Brd2, Brd3 and Brd4 Selectively Regulate Metabolic Pathways in the Pancreatic β-Cell. PLoS One11 (3), e0151329. 10.1371/journal.pone.0151329
11
DevaiahB. N.Case-BordenC.GegonneA.HsuC. H.ChenQ.MeerzamanD.et al (2016). BRD4 Is a Histone Acetyltransferase that Evicts Nucleosomes from Chromatin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.23 (6), 540–548. 10.1038/nsmb.3228
12
DingY. Q.ZhangY. H.LuJ.LiB.YuW. J.YueZ. B.et al (2021). MicroRNA-214 Contributes to Ang II-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy by Targeting SIRT3 to Provoke Mitochondrial Malfunction. Acta Pharmacol. Sin.42 (9), 1422–1436. 10.1038/s41401-020-00563-7
13
DoddM. S.BallD. R.SchroederM. A.Le PageL. M.AthertonH. J.HeatherL. C.et al (2012). In Vivo alterations in Cardiac Metabolism and Function in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Heart. Cardiovasc Res.95 (1), 69–76. 10.1093/cvr/cvs164
14
FranciscoT.RodriguesT. A.FreitasM. O.GrouC. P.CarvalhoA. F.Sá-MirandaC.et al (2013). A Cargo-Centered Perspective on the PEX5 Receptor-Mediated Peroxisomal Protein Import Pathway. J. Biol. Chem.288 (40), 29151–29159. 10.1074/jbc.M113.487140
15
GokaniS.BhattL. K. (2021). Bromodomains: A Novel Target for the Anticancer Therapy. Eur. J. Pharmacol.911, 174523. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174523
16
GoupilleO.PenglongT.KadriZ.Granger-LocatelliM.FucharoenS.Maouche-ChrétienL.et al (2016). Inhibition of the Acetyl Lysine-Binding Pocket of Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain Proteins Interferes with Adipogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.472 (4), 624–630. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.013
17
GrimmM.BrownJ. H. (2010). Beta-adrenergic Receptor Signaling in the Heart: Role of CaMKII. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol.48 (2), 322–330. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.10.016
18
GyurisA.DonovanD. J.SeymourK. A.LovascoL. A.SmilowitzN. R.HalperinA. L.et al (2009). The Chromatin-Targeting Protein Brd2 Is Required for Neural Tube Closure and Embryogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1789 (5), 413–421. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.03.005
19
KannoT.KannoY.LeRoyG.CamposE.SunH. W.BrooksS. R.et al (2014). BRD4 Assists Elongation of Both Coding and Enhancer RNAs by Interacting with Acetylated Histones. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.21 (12), 1047–1057. 10.1038/nsmb.2912
20
KempS.PujolA.WaterhamH. R.van GeelB. M.BoehmC. D.RaymondG. V.et al (2001). ABCD1 Mutations and the X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy Mutation Database: Role in Diagnosis and Clinical Correlations. Hum. Mutat.18 (6), 499–515. 10.1002/humu.1227
21
KimS.-K.LiuX.ParkJ.UmD.KilaruG.ChiangC.-M.et al (2021). Functional Coordination of BET Family Proteins Underlies Altered Transcription Associated with Memory Impairment in Fragile X Syndrome. Sci. Adv.7 (21), eabf7346. 10.1126/sciadv.abf7346
22
LaiL.LeoneT. C.KellerM. P.MartinO. J.BromanA. T.NigroJ.et al (2014). Energy Metabolic Reprogramming in the Hypertrophied and Early Stage Failing Heart: a Multisystems Approach. Circ. Heart Fail7 (6), 1022–1031. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001469
23
LangmeadB.SalzbergS. L. (2012). Fast Gapped-Read Alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods9 (4), 357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923
24
LiB.DeweyC. N. (2011). RSEM: Accurate Transcript Quantification from RNA-Seq Data with or without a Reference Genome. BMC Bioinforma.12, 323. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323
25
LiZ.GuoZ.LanR.CaiS.LinZ.LiJ.et al (2021). The poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ation of BRD4 Mediated by PARP1 Promoted Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B11 (5), 1286–1299. 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.12.012
26
LiuR.KenneyJ. W.ManousopoulouA.JohnstonH. E.KameiM.WoelkC. H.et al (2016). Quantitative Non-canonical Amino Acid Tagging (QuaNCAT) Proteomics Identifies Distinct Patterns of Protein Synthesis Rapidly Induced by Hypertrophic Agents in Cardiomyocytes, Revealing New Aspects of Metabolic Remodeling. Mol. Cell Proteomics15 (10), 3170–3189. 10.1074/mcp.M115.054312
27
LopaschukG. D.UssherJ. R.FolmesC. D.JaswalJ. S.StanleyW. C. (2010). Myocardial Fatty Acid Metabolism in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev.90 (1), 207–258. 10.1152/physrev.00015.2009
28
LoveM. I.HuberW.AndersS. (2014). Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol.15 (12), 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
29
MartinR. D.SunY.MacKinnonS.CucciaL.PagéV.HébertT. E.et al (2020). Differential Activation of P-TEFb Complexes in the Development of Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy Following Activation of Distinct G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Mol. Cell Biol.40 (14), e00048–00020. 10.1128/MCB.00048-20
30
MertzJ. A.ConeryA. R.BryantB. M.SandyP.BalasubramanianS.MeleD. A.et al (2011). Targeting MYC Dependence in Cancer by Inhibiting BET Bromodomains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108 (40), 16669–16674. 10.1073/pnas.1108190108
31
OsadchiiO. E. (2007). Cardiac Hypertrophy Induced by Sustained Beta-Adrenoreceptor Activation: Pathophysiological Aspects. Heart Fail Rev.12 (1), 66–86. 10.1007/s10741-007-9007-4
32
PetersonA. L.SiddiquiG.SloanE. K.CreekD. J. (2021). β-Adrenoceptor Regulation of Metabolism in U937 Derived Macrophages. Mol. Omics17 (4), 583–595. 10.1039/d1mo00057h
33
PrinjhaR. K.WitheringtonJ.LeeK. (2012). Place Your BETs: the Therapeutic Potential of Bromodomains. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.33 (3), 146–153. 10.1016/j.tips.2011.12.002
34
RayK. K.NichollsS. J.GinsbergH. D.JohanssonJ. O.Kalantar-ZadehK.KulikowskiE.et al (2019). Effect of Selective BET Protein Inhibitor Apabetalone on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Diabetes: Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the BETonMACE Trial. Am. Heart J.217, 72–83. 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.08.001
35
ScherM. B.VaqueroA.ReinbergD. (2007). SirT3 Is a Nuclear NAD+-dependent Histone Deacetylase that Translocates to the Mitochondria upon Cellular Stress. Genes Dev.21 (8), 920–928. 10.1101/gad.1527307
36
SharmaA.LarueR. C.PlumbM. R.MalaniN.MaleF.SlaughterA.et al (2013). BET Proteins Promote Efficient Murine Leukemia Virus Integration at Transcription Start Sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110 (29), 12036–12041. 10.1073/pnas.1307157110
37
ShenH.LiJ.XieX.YangH.ZhangM.WangB.et al (2021). BRD2 Regulation of Sigma-2 Receptor upon Cholesterol Deprivation. Life Sci. Alliance4 (1), e201900540. 10.26508/lsa.201900540
38
SpiltoirJ. I.StrattonM. S.CavasinM. A.Demos-DaviesK.ReidB. G.QiJ.et al (2013). BET Acetyl-Lysine Binding Proteins Control Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol.63, 175–179. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.07.017
39
StrattonM. S.McKinseyT. A. (2015). Acetyl-lysine Erasers and Readers in the Control of Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Ventricular Hypertrophy. Biochem. Cell Biol.93 (2), 149–157. 10.1139/bcb-2014-0119
40
SubramanianA.TamayoP.MoothaV. K.MukherjeeS.EbertB. L.GilletteM. A.et al (2005). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis: a Knowledge-Based Approach for Interpreting Genome-wide Expression Profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.102 (43), 15545–15550. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
41
SunR.WuY.HouW.SunZ.WangY.WeiH.et al (2017). Bromodomain-containing Protein 2 Induces Insulin Resistance via the mTOR/Akt Signaling Pathway and an Inflammatory Response in Adipose Tissue. Cell Signal30, 92–103. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.11.011
42
TaniguchiY. (2016). The Bromodomain and Extra-terminal Domain (BET) Family: Functional Anatomy of BET Paralogous Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci.17 (11), 1849. 10.3390/ijms17111849
43
ThamY. K.BernardoB. C.OoiJ. Y.WeeksK. L.McMullenJ. R. (2015). Pathophysiology of Cardiac Hypertrophy and Heart Failure: Signaling Pathways and Novel Therapeutic Targets. Arch. Toxicol.89 (9), 1401–1438. 10.1007/s00204-015-1477-x
44
van BilsenM.SmeetsP. J.GildeA. J.van der VusseG. J. (2004). Metabolic Remodelling of the Failing Heart: the Cardiac Burn-Out Syndrome?Cardiovasc Res.61 (2), 218–226. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.014
45
Van der FeenD. E.KurakulaK.TremblayE.BoucheratO.BossersG. P. L.SzulcekR.et al (2019). Multicenter Preclinical Validation of BET Inhibition for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.200 (7), 910–920. 10.1164/rccm.201812-2275OC
46
VincentG.KhairallahM.BouchardB.Des RosiersC. (2003). Metabolic Phenotyping of the Diseased Rat Heart Using 13C-Substrates and Ex Vivo Perfusion in the Working Mode. Mol. Cell Biochem.242 (1-2), 89–99. 10.1023/A:102118972887710.1007/978-1-4757-4712-6_12
47
WangF.LiuH.BlantonW. P.BelkinaA.LebrasseurN. K.DenisG. V. (2009). Brd2 Disruption in Mice Causes Severe Obesity without Type 2 Diabetes. Biochem. J.425 (1), 71–83. 10.1042/BJ20090928
48
WangN.WuR.TangD.KangR. (2021). The BET Family in Immunity and Disease. Signal Transduct. Target Ther.6 (1), 23. 10.1038/s41392-020-00384-4
49
WernerM. T.WangH.HamagamiN.HsuS. C.YanoJ. A.StonestromA. J.et al (2020). Comparative Structure-Function Analysis of Bromodomain and Extraterminal Motif (BET) Proteins in a Gene-Complementation System. J. Biol. Chem.295 (7), 1898–1914. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010679
50
XuC.TsaiY. H.GalboP. M.GongW.StoreyA. J.XuY.et al (2021). Cistrome Analysis of YY1 Uncovers a Regulatory axis of YY1:BRD2/4-PFKP during Tumorigenesis of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res.49 (9), 4971–4988. 10.1093/nar/gkab252
51
ZhengB.AoiY.ShahA. P.IwanaszkoM.DasS.RendlemanE. J.et al (2021). Acute Perturbation Strategies in Interrogating RNA Polymerase II Elongation Factor Function in Gene Expression. Genes Dev.35 (3-4), 273–285. 10.1101/gad.346106.120
52
ZhuW.WuR. D.LvY. G.LiuY. M.HuangH.XuJ. Q. (2020). BRD4 Blockage Alleviates Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy through the Suppression of Fibrosis and Inflammation via Reducing ROS Generation. Biomed. Pharmacother.121, 109368. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109368
53
ZongJ.LiS.WangY.MoW.SunR.YuM. (2019). Bromodomain-containing Protein 2 Promotes Lipolysis via ERK/HSL Signalling Pathway in White Adipose Tissue of Mice. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.281, 105–116. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2019.05.011
Summary
Keywords
bromodomain containing protein 2 (BRD2), bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) family, cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac metabolism, citrate cycle (TCA cycle)
Citation
Lin Z, Li Z, Guo Z, Cao Y, Li J, Liu P and Li Z (2022) Epigenetic Reader Bromodomain Containing Protein 2 Facilitates Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy via Regulating the Expression of Citrate Cycle Genes. Front. Pharmacol. 13:887991. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.887991
Received
02 March 2022
Accepted
25 April 2022
Published
25 May 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Qiwei Yang, The University of Chicago, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Lin, Li, Guo, Cao, Li, Liu and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peiqing Liu, liupq@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Zhuoming Li, lizhm5@mail.sysu.edu.cn
† These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Cardiovascular and Smooth Muscle Pharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.