Abstract
Natural products offer a wide range of bioactivity including antimicrobial properties. There are many reports showing the antimicrobial activities of phytochem icals from plants. However, the bioactivity is limited due to multidrug resistant properties of the microorganism and different composition of cell membrane. The antibacterial activity of the natural products is different toward Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. These phenomena are caused by improper physicochemical conditions of the substance which hinder the phytochemical bioactivity against the broad range of bacteria. One of the strategies to improve the antimicrobial action is by biogenic synthesis via redox balance of the antimicrobial active substance with metal to form nanosized materials or nanoparticles (NPs). Antibiotic resistance is not relevant to NPs because the action of NPs is via direct contact with bacterial cell walls without the need of penetration into microbial cells. The NPs that have shown their effectiveness in preventing or overcoming biofilm formation such as silver-based nanoparticles (AgNPs), gold-based nanoparticles (AuNPs), platinum-based nanoparticles (PtNPs) and Zinc oxide-based nanoparticles (ZnONPs). Due to its considerably simple synthesis procedure has encouraged researchers to explore antimicrobial potency of metallic nanoparticles. Those metallic nanoparticles remarkably express synergistic effects against the microorganisms tested by affecting bacterial redox balance, thus disrupting their homeostasis. In this paper, we discuss the type of metallic nanoparticle which have been used to improve the antimicrobial activity of plant extract/constituents, preparation or synthesis process and characterisation of the plant-based metallic nanoparticles.
Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance occurs when the pathogenic microorganisms survive upon exposure to a drug that would normally kill them and allows them to continue the infection (Oneil, 2016). The cases of antimicrobial resistance increase every year and estimate 10 million deaths every year (Oneil, 2016). Some bacteria are known to develop resistant such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin resistant Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumonia as well as Clostridium difficile ().
Antimicrobial resistance could be developed at DNA and protein levels (Wang et al., 2017). Antimicrobial resistance happens due to microbe’s interaction with their environment. Naturally, they will be able to develop intrinsic resistance to one or more antimicrobials. Whereas, in clinical setting, the resistance refers to acquired resistance in the microbial population that was previously susceptible to antimicrobial agents (Munita and Arias, 2016).
Antimicrobial from natural products have inspired antibiotic discovery and have been used for microbial control. These include plant extracts, small antimicrobial peptides, essential oils, bacteriocins and various groups of compounds (Stan et al., 2021). There are several reports showing the antimicrobial activity of free compounds isolated from natural sources. Natural products such as tannins are good substances to control microbial growth by interact with bacterial proteins and precipitating them (Puljula et al., 2020). Chalcone derivative from Croton anisodontus Mull. Arg. acts as a competitive inhibitor Mep A efflux pump and potentiates ciprofloxacin’s action against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (Xavier 2020). Betulinic acid was reported to have string inhibition against Candida albicans (Lashin et al., 2021). Nimbolide from Azadiracta indica A. Juss possesses significant bactericidal activity against Helicobacter pylori by killing free living bacteria and cells within biofilm (Wylie et al., 2022). The following table (Table 1) presents selected antimicrobial plants which were obtained from database using the keywords of “plant” and “antimicrobial activity”.
TABLE 1
| Plant | Family | Compounds | MIC | Action | Microorganism | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morus mesozygia Stapf ex A.Chev | Moraceae | 3β-acetoxyurs-12-en-11-one moracin Q, moracin T, morasin R morasin U, moracin C, moracin M, artocarpesin, cycloartocarpesin | 5–625 μg/ml | Not reported | Citrobacter freund, Escherichia coli, Shigella dysenteri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhii, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus Streptococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, Microsporum audouinii | Kuete et al. (2009) |
| Citrus x sinensis (L.) Osbeck | Rutaceae | pectin | 0.162–3.125 mg/ml | Still not understood | Shigella vulgaris, S. typhi, S. paratyphi, S. typhimurium, K. aerogenes, E. coli, Proteus vulgaris, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Vibrio cholerae, P. aeruginosa | |
| Hypericum roeperianum G.W. Schimp. ex A.Rich. var. Roeperianum | Hypericaceae | acetone extract | 0.06–0.32 mg/ml | Not reported | E. coli, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, B. cereus | |
| Cremaspora triflora (Thonn.) K.Schum | Rubiaceae | acetone extract | 0.02–0.32 mg/ml | Not reported | E. coli, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, E. faecalis, Bacillus cereus | |
| Maesa lanceolata Forssk | Primulaceae | acetone extract | 0.04–0.16 mg/ml | Not reported | E. coli, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, E. faecalis, B. cereus | |
| Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi | Lamiaceae | baicalein and wogonin | 0.03–0.23 mM | Plasmatic membrane disintegration DNA fragmentation Accumulation of ROS Changes at the ultrastructural level | Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Aspergillus fumigatus, C. albicans | |
| Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf | Poaceae | citronellal | 1.2 mg/ml | Disrupts cell membrane homeostasis Oxidative and genotoxic effects via ROS formation Inhibits biofilm formation | C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei | Singh et al. (2016) |
| Essential oil (Different plant extracts) | — | carvacol, thymol, eugenol, methyl eugenol | 125–1250 μg/ml | Anti-adherence activity Anti-proteinase activity | C. albicans, C. auris | Shaban et al. (2020) |
| Cinnamomum verum J. Presl | Lauraceae | cinnamaldehyde | 1000 μg/ml | Inhibit biofilm formation | Streptococcus mutan | |
| Berberis cretica L | Berberidaceae | magnoflorine | 50–100 μg/ml | Inhibit biofilm formation | C. albicans C. tropicalis var. tropicalis C. parapsilosis var. parapsilosis, C. glabrata | |
| Okon et al. (2020) | ||||||
| Eucalyptus robusta Smith | Myrtaceae | (+)-eucalrobusone X | 10.78 μg/ml | Not reported | C. albicans | Shang et al. (2019) |
| E. robusta Smith | Myrtaceae | eucalrobusone U | 1.53 μg/ml | Not reported | C. glabrata | Shang et al. (2019) |
| Laurus nobilis L | Lauraceae | essential oil | 250–500 μg/ml | Inhibits cell wall formation Affects membrane ionic permeability | C. albicans,C. tropicalis, C. krusei | Peixoto et al. (2017) |
| Punica granatum L | Lythraceae | gallic acid | 6.25–100 μg/ml | Inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis Reduction of squalene epoxidase activity | Trichophyton rubrum T. mentagrophytes, T. violaceum, Microsporum canis, T. verrucosum, T. schoenleinii; C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. tropicalis | Li et al. (2017) |
| Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc | Polygonaceae | resveratrol | 20 μM | Fungal cell apoptosis via caspase-dependent pathway | C. albicans | Wang et al. (2013) |
| Lee and Lee, (2015) |
Plants with antimicrobial activity.
Role of NPs in Biofilm Formation
NPs has been recorded as an effective method in combating microbial resistance and multidrug-resistance mutant (Wang et al., 2017) especially on the interaction with microbial biofilm.
Bacterial biofilms are complex surface on the communities of bacteria that consist of microorganism culture, extracellular polymer matrix (EPM), complex biopolysaccharide, secreted protein proteins and extracellular DNA (Muhammad et al., 2020; Shkodenko et al., 2020).
The role of NPs in antimicrobial activity including the disruption of bacterial membranes and interaction with biofilm (Shkodenko et al., 2020). The interaction between NPs and biofilm could occur in following step: transfer of NPs to the biofilm; attachment to the surface and migration into biofilms (Figure 1). The process is affected by physicochemical properties of NPs, the environment and extracellular polymeric matric (Shkodenko et al., 2020).
FIGURE 1
Nanoparticle in Drug Delivery
New approach to combat resistant microorganisms is urgently required to reduce the clinical burden in the use of antibiotics. Nanotechnology-based antimicrobials could be one of strategies which is acting synergistically via intrinsically antimicrobials and those as carriers (Makvandi et al., 2020). Nanotechnology is emerging field of science which deals with the synthesis of nanoparticles in improving physicochemical properties of materials for human benefits (). The success research in nanoparticle-based delivery is due to their advantages such as safety assessment, scalable production, and availability for clinical trials ().
The nanoparticles fall between 1 and 100 nm size which can be prepared by top-down methods include mechanical milling, laser ablation, etching, sputtering, and electro-explosion and bottom-up approaches such as chemical vapor deposition, solvothermal and hydrothermal methods, sol–gel method, soft and hard templating methods, reverse micelle methods (). Nanoscale delivery has gained interest due to their exceptional activity allowing reaction to be achieved effectively and efficiently (). Metal-based nanomaterials have been continuously investigated for their application due to their potential usage. Metal nanoparticles (MNPs) display potential capacity and higher surface area making them suitable in numerous applications including medicine, drug delivery, cosmetics, food product, sensors, optics, electronics, paints and agriculture (Perveen et al., 2022).
The metal-based nanocarriers have been reported to increase the antimicrobial activity (Makvandi et al., 2020) in addition to their own activity (Yonathan et al., 2022). The use of noble (magnetic) metal nanoparticles (MNPS) especially gold (Au), silver (Ag) and platinum (Pt) have been attracting great attention due to its multiple antibacterial properties and simple synthesis methods (Shafey, 2020). They act selectively attached to a functional molecule and allow transportation to targeted locations under magnetic fields (). The noble metal particle can kill bacteria and eradicate biofilms by cell membrane potential stability disruption as well as binding bacterial enzymes or DNA and (Ye et al., 2022). MNPs can also act as free radical damaging bacterial cell membrane (Ye et al., 2022). Meanwhile, the antibacterial agents show similar mechanisms with one or multiple targets on bacterial protein synthesis, bacterial cell wall synthesis, bacterial cell membrane destruction, bacterial DNA replication and repair as well as inhibition of metabolite pathway (). When the antimicrobial agent is encapsulated with metal-nanoparticles, they would have a synergistic effect therefore the toxicity level would decrease and the efficacy would increase.
MNPs in Antibiotic Potency Enhancement
Metal nanoparticles are becoming a trend strategy to improve antibiotic activity due to its simple synthesis. Antibacterial activity of the antibiotic is different against bacterial gram stain, due to organization of the structures outside the plasma membrane but below the capsule where in Gram-negative organisms these structures constitute the cell envelope, whereas in Gram-positive organisms they are called a cell wall (Salton and Kim, 1996). The silver nanoparticles alone excellently discompose the polymer sub-units of the cell membrane in micro-organisms. In combination with plant material which is mediated silver nanoparticles consequently rupture the cell membrane and destroy the protein synthesis mechanism in the bacteria ().
Study on antibiotic colistin on anionic gold nanoparticle against Escherichia coli reduces minimum inhibition of 6-folds compared to colistin alone (). A gold nanoparticle of vancomycin has shown more effective inhibition towards Gram-negative bacteria of E. coli, Klebsiella oxytoca and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8 folds inhibition and towards Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus with 1.6 fold compared to free vancomycin (). Combinatorial silver nanopacked Daptomycin inherits synergistic effects of both for their bactericidal activity (Zheng et al., 2016).
Plant Extract Encapsulated With MNPs
Gold Nanoparticle in Antimicrobial Delivery of Natural Products
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) is an important class of nanoparticles. They have been widely used in medical and non-medical applications as an ideal material for a variety of purposes. Inertness, biocompatibility, and, most importantly, low toxicity. Au-NPs have been shown to have biological activity and have been studied using a variety of important Au (III) properties that aid in Au-NPs synthesised from a variety of materials. Au-NPs are adaptive, resourceful, and can be designed to execute a wide range of tasks, making them a viable alternative to Au. In comparison to other NPs such as Ag, Au-NPs are more effective at attacking a variety of bacteria and viruses ().
While Au is widely used as a nontoxic nanomaterial, the materials used to prepare and modify Au-NPs may be toxic (). While the presence of Au-NPs in high concentrations may indicate toxicity, there are many studies showing that Au-NPs do appear to possess antibacterial properties. At certain concentrations, it has been demonstrated that these NPs are non-toxic to normal cells (). Not only do modified Au-NPs have great antimicrobial abilities against standard strains of bacteria, but they also have a unique ability to fight cancer (). Au (III) that is attached to different drug systems has been shown to make them more effective at killing bacteria. A lot of different bacteria, like M. luteus, E. coli, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa can be killed by aminoglycosides that are coated with AuNPs ().
Antimicrobial agents are used to keep moulds, bacteria, and fungi populations under control. To prevent infection, these substances prevent bacteria from multiplying on various surfaces. Au and Ag are two examples of antimicrobial agents that contain active metal ingredients. Numerous studies have established the antimicrobial effect of gold nanoparticles (). Due to the fact that NPs’ antimicrobial activity is inversely proportional to their size, the smaller the size of Au-NPs, the higher their antimicrobial activity against a variety of microbes such as K. pneumonia, S. aureus, P. vulgaris, E. coli, and B. subtilis. Thangamani and Bhuvaneshwari investigated these synthesised Au-NPs’ antimicrobial activity against the aforementioned microbes (Thangamani and Bhuvaneshwari, 2019). In addition, antibacterial activity of NPs has been investigated against a variety of microbes, including E. coli, E. faecalis, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, Vibrio damsel, Vibrio fluvialis and Candida albicans (Sunderam et al., 2019). The biological activity of Au-NPs synthesised via biogenic synthesis using the endophytic fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides derived from seaweed Sargassum wightii was evaluated against S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis. Among the reported microbes, these AuNPs portrayed the lowest activity towards B. subtilis and the greatest effect toward S. aureus. After 3 min, approximately half of the E. coli were died, while 80% were killed after 6 min. After 10 minutes of photoactivation, no bacterial stains were detected (Manjunath et al., 2017).
Formulating NPs from natural extracts containing biologically active pharmacophores is common. Rajathi and colleagues synthesised Au-NPs containing Stoechospermum marginatum and evaluated the antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella oxytoca, Salmonella typhimurium, Enterobacter faecalis, Klebsiella pneumonia and Proteus vulgaris. They discovered that Klebsiella pneumonia was more susceptible to these AuNPs, among other microbes (). Dual metallic nanoparticles were synthesised by combining Ag and Au in various ratios using a red alga called Gracilaria sp. These NPs were then tested for antimicrobial activity against a variety of bacteria, including Salmonella typhii, E. coli, S. aureus and K. pneumonia. These NPs have bactericidal effects on S. aureus and K. pneumonia (Ramakritinan et al., 2013). Additionally, Au-NPs from Morus alba L. (mulberry) leaf extract were also synthesised and tested against human pathogens. These Au-NPs successfully inhibited Vibrio cholera and S. aureus (). Au-NPs were synthesised from HAuCl4 using a papaya leaf extract via a green synthetic technique. Investigating these NPs for biomedical applications revealed that they are effective against S. aureus and P. putida (Sunkari et al., 2017).
The Au-NPs from Elaeocarpus ganitrus Blume seed extract via a hydrothermal route were synthesised and their antimicrobial activity was observed against Proteus desmolyticum and S. aureus, in which both of the microbes were killed (Vinay et al., 2021). Another group of researchers synthesised Au-NPs from Mentha longifolia (L.) L. extract and demonstrated their efficacy in killing B. subtilis, K. pneumoniae and S. aureus strains (Rauf et al., 2021). Biological Au-NPs containing Jasminum auriculatum Vahl. leaf extract exhibited promising anti-bacterial activity against E. coli, S. aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and K. pneumonia) (). Additionally, Au-NPs were synthesised from a mixture of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don and Carica papaya L. leaf extracts and these NPs possessed antibacterial activity against E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, S. aureus and Proteus vulgaris (Muthukumar et al., 2016).
Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a major global issue, thus reducing the availability of effective antibiotics. As a result, novel antibiotics from various sources especially natural extracts with novel delivery are urgently required (Wang et al., 2017) The Au-NPs produced using H2O2 as a reduction enhancer and starch as a reducing agent exhibited significant bactericidal activity against S. aureus (). Functionalised Au-NPs with arginine and hydroxyapatite portrayed antibacterial activity against three bacteria, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Besides, it was discovered that the activity of these functionalized Au-NPs was similar to that of Au-NPs, but with a stronger inhibitory effect towards P. aeruginosa strain (Kurtjak et al., 2017).
P. aeruginosa is believed to be the most resistant bacteria due to its mutational capability, demonstrating a high degree of resistance to antibiotics. The Au-NPs were formulated with curcumin extracted from Curcuma pseudomontana J. Graham and hematite (a-Fe2O3). It was reported that these NPs showed antimicrobial action against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and B. subtilis with a higher degree of antimicrobial effect toward E. coli (Muniyappan et al., 2021). Lists of the Au-NPs containing natural extracts and demonstrates antibacterial activity is presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2
| Nanoparticle | Plant | Extract/Compounds | Microorganisms | Gram Strain | Size (nm) | Activity | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au | Curcuma pseudomontana J. Graham | Extract (Rhizomes) | S. aureus, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa and E. coli | Positive and negative | 20 to 39 | At 300 microg/ml concentration, zone nhibition | Muniyappan et al. (2021) |
| E. coli (28 mm) | |||||||
| B. subtilis (26 mm) | |||||||
| S. aureus (25 mm) | |||||||
| P. aeruginosa (23 mm) | |||||||
| Au | Annacardium occidentale L | Extract (Leaves) | B. subtilis and E. coli | Positive and negative | 10 to 30 | At 40 microL, zone inhibition: E. coli (24 mm) | Sunderam et al. (2019) |
| B. subtilis (10 mm) | |||||||
| Au | Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss | Extract (Leaves) | S. aureus, B. subtilis, B. cereus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa | Positive and negative | 7.9 to 22.63 | No antibacterial activity | |
| Au | Jasminum auriculatum Vahl | Extract (Leaves) | S. pyogenes, S. aureus, E. coli and K. pneumonia | Positive and negative | 8 to 37 | At 30 microL, inhibition zone: S. pyogenes (12 mm) S. aureus (9 mm) | ()) |
| E. coli (12 mm) | |||||||
| K. pneumonia (7 mm) | |||||||
| Au | Pimpinella anisum L | Extract (Seeds) | S. aureus and E.coli | Positive and negative | 63 | No antibacterial activity | Zayed et al. (2020) |
| Au | Glycyrrhzia glabra L | Extract (Roots) | B. subtitis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and Salmonella typhi | Positive and negative | 53.7 | Good antibacterial activity against gram negative microbes | |
| Au | Pituranthos tortuosus (Desh.) Benth. and Hook. F. ex. Asch. and Schweif | Extract (Aerial) | Helicobacter pylori | Negative | 5 to 15 | AuNPs showed antibacterial activity towards H. pylori with MIC value of 15, 63 (microgram/ml) | |
| Au | Pongammia pinnata (L.) Pierre | Extract (Leaves) | Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Acid-fast gram positive | 16 | Effective in killing | |
| M. tuberculosis with MIC of 10 microg/ml | |||||||
| Au | Stoechospermum marginatum (kutzing) | Extract (Leaves) | P. aeruginosa, K. oxytoca, E. faecalis, K. pneumonia, E. coli, S. typhi, S paratyphi | Positive and negative | 18.7–93.7 | Excellent activity in comparison to positive control (tetracyclines) towards E. faecalis | |
| Au | Glaciracia sp. | Extract (Red alga) | S. aureus, E.coli, K. pneumonia, S. typhi, P. aeruginosa | Positive and negative | 20–40 | Bimetallic NP’s of 1:3 concentration showed zones of inhibition against the pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae rather than Ag NPs and Au NP’s | Ramakritinan et al. (2013) |
| Au | Mentha longifolia (L.) L | Extact (Leaves) | K. pneumonia, S. aureus, B. subtilis | Positive and negative | 13.45 | AuNPs possessed antibacterial activity towards S. aureus | Rauf et al. (2021) |
| Au | Moringa oleifera Lam | Extract (Bark, leaf and flower) | Aspergillus sp. | — | -(non-uniform spherical) | Effective in killing | Mondal et al. (2022) |
| Aspergillus sp. at high concentration (200 mg/L) |
Lists the Au-NPs containing natural extracts and demonstrates antibacterial activity.
Silver and Other Nanoparticles in Antimicrobial Delivery of Natural Products
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) showed remarkable biological and physicochemical properties. Silver ions demonstrated antimicrobial activity. The use of AgNPs in encapsulating natural products material will enhance their antimicrobial activity via DNA activity ().
Euphorbia serpens Kunth synthetized using green synthesis AgNPs showed significant antibacterial effect against against E. coli with 20 ± 06 mm and S. typhi with 18 ± 0:5 mm zone of inhibition compared to standard antibiotic amoxicillin with 23 ± 0:3 mm and 20 ± 0:4 mm zone of inhibition (). Trigonella foenum-graecum-AgNPs was reported to have antimicrobial activity against pathogenic fungi in plant Alternaria alternata and pathogenic bacteria in plant Pseudomonas syringae ().
Biogenic synthesis of Persicaria odorata (Lour.) Sojak silver nanoparticles corroborated improve the bactericidal activity by dose-dependent inhibition against S. epidermis and Methicillin resistant S. aureus (Lubis et al., 2022). A comparison study of antibacterial activity between AgNPS and Ag zeolite A (ZA) showed that AgNPS against E. coli ATCC 11229 and S. aureus ATCC found that the inhibition of AgNPs is higher than AgZA (). AgNPs of Mentha piperita L. increased the antibacterial activity of the extracts in inhibiting the growth of both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (Mojally et al., 2022). The synergistic effect of ZnO nanoparticle with plant extract was shown by Agle marmelos (L.) Correa (Am-ZnO) which shown greater antibacterial and antibiofilm effects against Gram-negative bacteria when compared to Gram-positive bacteria (Senthamarai and Malaikozhundan, 2022). Interestingly the Sambucus ebulus L.-AgNPs able to inhibit Gram-negative bacteria as reported by S. aureus with MIC value of 1.5 mg/ml. (). Table 3 displays the silver and other metal nanoparticles which were recently reported.
TABLE 3
| Nanoparticle | Plant | Extract/Compounds | Microorganisms | Gram Strain | Size | Activity | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | Ferula ovina Boiss | Extract | E. coli and S. typhimurium | Negative | 15.7–23.86 nm | Enhanced | |
| Ag | Glochidion candolleanum (Wight and Arn.) Chakrab. and M. Gangop | ethyl acetate extract | Salmonella enterica | Negative | N/A | Enhanced | |
| P.aeruginosa | |||||||
| Ag | Berberis vulgaris L | Aqueous extract | P. mirabilis, E. coli, E. faecalis S. aureus, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumonia | Negative and positive | 45–60 nm | Enhanced | |
| Ag | Sambucus ebulus L | Methanol | S. aureus | Positive | 35–50 nm | Enhanced | |
| Ag | Areca catechu L | Aqueous | Positive and negative | 15–20 nm | Enhanced | ||
| Ag | Pisum sativum L | Aqueous | S. aureus ATCC 25923 (22 ± 2 mm) | Positive | 30 nm | Enhanced | |
| Ag | Passiflora subpeltata Ortega | Aqueous | B. cereus (27.5 mm) | Positive | 22.6 nm | Enhanced | Loganathan et al. (2022) |
| Ag | Guettarda apeciosa L | Aqueous leaf extract | [Staphylococcus Aures (MTCC 25,923), Basillus Subtilis (MTCC 2451)) and two gram-negative (Escherichia coli (MTCC 25,922), Streptococcus Aureus (MTCC 273)] | Positive and negative | 6.5–160 nm | Antimicrobial activity | |
| Ag | Anagallis monellin L | Ethyl acetate leaves extract | Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus luteus with 15 and 16 mm | Positive and fungi | 22 nm | Enhanced | |
| Candida albicans | |||||||
| Ag | Tricholoma ustale Benth. and Agaricus arvensis L | Extract | Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Candida utilis | Negative, positive and fungi | 20 nm | Antimicrobial activity | |
| Zn | Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa | Aquouse unripe fruit extract | Gram-negative bacteria | Negative | 22.5 nm | Synergistic effect | Senthamarai and Malaikozhundan, (2022) |
| Ti | Luffa acutangular (L.) Roxb | Aqueous | E. coli (45 ± 0.21), followed by P. aeruginosa (43 ± 0.45), S. aureus (42 ± 0.13), K. pneumoniae (27 ± 0.54), E. faecalis (21 ± 0.41) and B. subtilis (18 ± 0.56) at 40 mg/ml concentration | Negative and positive | 10–59 nm | Enhanced | |
| Fe | Plumeria obtusa L | Water Extract | E. coli, B. subtilis and fungal strains A. niger and S. commune | Negative and fungi | 50 nm | Enhanced | Perveen et al. (2022) |
The synthesis of metallic nanoparticle in plant-based antimicrobial.
Green Synthesis MNPs
Several methods have been introduced to synthesise metal NPs including chemical, physical and biological methods using microwave-assisted, radiation-assisted, thermal decomposition, chemical and photo-chemical reaction, and green synthesis methods. Synthesis using bio-organisms or green synthesis compatible with the green chemistry principle. And green synthesis is required to avoid the production of unwanted or harmful by-products through the build-up of reliable, sustainable, and eco-friendly synthesis procedures. To achieve the goal of green synthesis, the natural resources and the ideal solvent systems that are environmentally friendly, non-toxic and safe reagent are essential (Singh et al., 2018).
Green synthesis of MNPs synthesised using biological techniques or green technology have diverse natures, with greater stability and appropriate dimension since they are synthesised using a one-step procedure. Therefore, the green synthesis of MNPs has been adopted to accommodate various biological materials, such as viruses, bacteria, fungi, algae, yeast, plant and plant products. Many researchers prefer to use green synthesis due to some advantages including cost effectiveness because the biological component itself acts as reducing and capping agents, eco-friendly approach as toxic chemicals are not used, and external experimental conditions like high energy and high pressure are not required that lead to energy saving process. Furthermore, the synthesis of a wide range of MNPs has been reported using various plants because it is a simple and easy process to produce MNPs at large scale compared to bacteria and/or fungi mediated synthesis (Song and Kim, 2009; ; Ye et al., 2022).
Plant mediated synthesis of MNPs is a revolutionary technique that has a wide range of applications in medicine, agriculture and food industries that offer an advantage which increases the life span of NPs. This is due to the physico-chemical properties of the plants based MNPs that overcome the limitation of conventional chemical and physical methods of NPs synthesis (Malik et al., 2014; ). Plant mediated synthesis of MNPs can be achieved by three different methods, intracellularly (inside the plant), extracellularly (using plant extracts), and using individual phytochemicals. Plants can mediate the synthesis of MNPs intracellularly because plants have the capability to accumulate the metals and transform these accumulated metals to NPs intracellularly. Moreover, the presence of several biomolecules such as protein, amino acids, carbohydrates, reducing sugar, vitamins, alkaloids, aldehydes, flavones, ketones, phenolics, saponins, tannins, and terpenoids in the plant plays a key role in the reduction of metals. These biomolecules contain hydroxyl, carbonyl and amine functional groups that react with metal ions and reduce their size into nano size. For example, flavonoids contain several functional groups, and it is believed that the -OH group of flavonoids is responsible for the reduction of metal ions into NPs (Marslin et al., 2018; ). Flavonoids not only help in bio-reduction of the metal ion to the nano size, but also play an important role in the capping of the NPs which is important for the stability and biocompatibility (). In addition, reducing agents such as phenolics, sterols and alkaloids can reduce the metal ions into NPs in a single reaction ().
The type and nature of the metal used for MNPs biosynthesis mainly determine the NPs end use industry. Several metal such as silver (Ag), copper (Cu), gold (Au) and many others have been widely used for the biosynthesis of NPs using plant extracts of various plant species (Zhang et al., 2020). Au and Ag were the first metal ion used in plant extract-mediated synthesis of NPs. Acalypha indica, Aloe barbadensis, Datura metel, Nelumbo nucifera, Jatropha curcas, Ocimum leaf, Cassia auriculata, and Rhododedendron dauricam have been used to produce Ag nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles have also been synthesized using Aloe barbadensis Miller, Medicago sativa, Magnolia kobus, Diopyros kaki, Cinnamomum camphora, and Pelargonium graveolens leaf ().
Peralta-Videa et al., 2016 reported the synthesis of plant based metallic nanoparticles and their potential application. Metals from their constituents are reduced and stabilised by macromolecules and phytonutrients, such as proteins, reducing sugars, phenolics, flavonoids, ethyl alcohols, terpenes, and phenolic acids present in plant extracts. (Naseer et al., 2020) split the function of biomolecules in the formation of NPs as redoxed intermediaries for metals reductions and capped agents for non-agglomeration and post-surface modification of NPs.
In general, the synthesis of MNPs is initiated by mixing the plant biomass/extract with of noble metal salt precursors with biomaterial at a desired temperature and pH. The presence of various compounds of biomolecules act as reducing and capping agents for the synthesis of NPs from its metal salt precursors. The reduction of metal salt precursors to its successive NPs can be initially confirmed by visualising the colour change of the colloidal solution (Kuppusamy et al., 2016; Sriramulu et al., 2020).
The variation in the size, shape, and properties of accumulated NPs can be observed due to the variation in stabilising and reducing potential of biomolecules present in the plant. For example, the formation of gold NPs inside the living plant, alfalfa was reported by () when the plants were grown in AuCl4 rich environment. And in a similar kind of study, () observed the ability of Medicago sativa and Brassica juncea plants to accumulate Au NPs from aqueous solutions of KAuCl4. The NPs were majorly located in the xylem parenchyma cells while some were also accumulated throughout the epidermis, cortex, and vascular tissue. Several studies reported the synthesis of Ag, Au, Cu, Pt, Cd, Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, etc. using various biological agents in the recent past. The experimental procedure for the synthesis of NPs using plant biomass is depicted in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2
Unique Antibacterial Mechanism of MNPs
The mechanism of action of MNPs on bacterial cells is affected by the physiochemical properties of NPs such as charge, size, zeta potential, surface morphology and crystal structure. Whereas, the environmental factor, exposure time and bacterial strains are also influence the antibacterial effect of MNPs (Wang et al., 2017). There are three well known antimicrobial effects of NPs includes electrostatic interaction causing mechanical damage of cell walls, generation of reactive oxygen species resulting oxidative stress and disruption of cell structures and protein structure as a result of metal release (Wang et al., 2017).
Despite several approaches that have been made over the years, the precise mechanism of action of MNPs as antimicrobial agents is still not fully understood. Antimicrobial action of MNPs is linked to four main mechanisms, attraction to bacterial surface, destabilisation of bacterial or fungal cell wall and/or membrane with change in its permeability, induction of toxicity and oxidative stress by generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radical, and modulation of signal transduction pathways (). The adhesion of MNPs onto the surface of bacteria is the first step of a complex mechanism of bacterial inhibition. The adhesion of MNPs is influenced highly by their size and also zeta potential that depends on the method for their synthesis that might have a positive, negative or neutral surface charge. Varying surface charge of MNPs will cause the fluctuation of the antibacterial activity. Since the bacterial surface shows a slightly negative charge, positively charged MNPs are strongly attracted to the surface of bacteria, resulting in an increasing of antibacterial activity. On the other hand, negative or neutral charged MNPs have a significantly decreased antibacterial effect. However, an increase in the concentration of MNPs allows the attenuation of electrostatic repulsion through a bacterial surface saturation method (). After the adhesion onto the bacterial surface, MNPs can interact with the cells via two mechanisms, i.e, smaller MNPs penetrate directly into the cell, while the larger MNPs are retained outside the bacteria. In both situations, MNPs continuously release the metal ions, and these ions bind to the cell membrane structure that will destabilise the membrane potential and cause proton leakage. Cell wall destabilisation highly increases bacterial permeability and allows larger MNPs to enter the cell (Losasso et al., 2014).
There are a number of plant extracts and natural compounds isolated from plants that have antibacterial and antifungal activities. Most natural antimicrobial agents that target bacteria appear to disrupt membrane permeability, leading to membrane rupture and cell lysis. Furthermore, the inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis, reduction of squalene epoxidase activity and fungal cell apoptosis are the specific mechanisms for antifungal, due to the structural differences between bacterial and fungal. However, not all mechanisms of action have been elucidated, and sometimes the mechanism may be indirect, stimulating the host immune system or inhibiting adhesion to the host cell.
Therefore, due to the unique action of metal nanoparticles that working synergically with botanical drugs may be useful to overcome multi drug resistance bacteria. A proposed site of action MNPs in enhancing antimicrobial activity of natural products is shown in Figure 3.
FIGURE 3
Once inside the cell, MNPs and their metal ions interact with numerous structures and biomolecules such as proteins, lipids and DNA, resulting in cell dysfunction. MNPs are well known by their high capacity to produce ROS and free radicals such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O−), and hydroxyl radical (OH•). Even though ROS occur naturally in bacteria as a result of cellular respiration, under normal circumstances bacteria have defense mechanism such as glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase, and catalase that act as antioxidant enzymes and eliminate these toxic species. High concentrations of metal ions released by MNPs produce extreme levels of oxidative stress. However, antioxidant enzymes will remove some of the released metal ions and these are not enough to neutralise ROS and free radical by the MNPs amount (Qing et al., 2018). These species interact with respiratory chain proteins on the membrane and inactivate the enzyme due to their high affinity to phosphates, thiol and carboxyl groups (). Their linkage to phosphate groups of the enzyme will inhibit the phosphorylation of proteins which is important for enzymatic activation, and this process cause the inhibition of bacterial growth. Furthermore, dephosphorylation of tyrosine residues of protein was also been implicated in disruption of biosynthesis and transport of exopolysaccharide and capsular polysaccharide to the membrane that will cause the disruption of cell cycle (). In addition, metal ions can intercalate DNA strands forming complexes with nucleic acids between the purine and pyrimidine base pairs that cause the disruption of hydrogen between them (Qing et al., 2018) and cause the DNA damage.
Characterisation MNPs
NPs’ physicochemical qualities influence their behaviour, biodistribution, safety, and efficacy. Thus, characterisation of metal NPs is critical for assessing the functional properties of the produced particles. Dynamic light scattering (DLS), zeta potential analyser, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and UV-vis spectroscopy are some of the examples of technique used for NPs’ characterization. Combining these spectroscopic techniques offers information that could not be obtained with a single approach and helps in determine the quality of the synthesised nanoparticles.
The information such as size, size distribution, shape and surface chemistry are essential since these characteristics affect the absorption of NPs at the targeted site. Size of synthesised metal NPs is usually in the range of 5–100 nm and proven to enhance the antibacterial activity of plant extract loaded in NPs (; ). The spectroscopy techniques such as DLS usually used to measure NPs size, size distribution and degree of aggregation.
Additionally, zeta potential analyser is used for determining the NPs surface charge. The surface charge above +30 mV and below −30 mV is generally regarded as targeted value to portrays lower degree of NPs aggregation and nanoparticle stability (Samimi et al., 2019). Shape is another NPs characteristic which can be measured using microscopy techniques such as SEM and TEM. TEM for instance, is a common technique to analyse NPs size, size distribution and shape. Other microscopy technique such as AFM can also being used to analyse NPs size, 3D-shape and elemental composition (Mourdikoudis et al., 2018) Usually after NPs synthesis, it will be characterised in terms of their crystal structure and lattice dimension using XRD. This technique was developed primarily to determine the 3D architectures and crystallinity of NPs.
FTIR spectroscopy is a method for determining NP structure and content. This method measures the absorption of electromagnetic radiation in the mid-infrared region (4,000–400 cm−1). FTIR analysis can be performed on both solid and liquid samples, and it has also been used to describe bacteria exposed to nanoparticles. The characteristics of functional groups and metabolites present on the surface of nanoparticles may be easily recognised using FTIR, which can occasionally aid in the reduction and stabilisation of nanoparticles (Nizamov et al., 2022).
UV-visible spectroscopy can be used to examine the scattering and absorption of light travelling through the material. This technique aids in the identification and characterisation of nanomaterials, as well as the determination of the stability of the nanoparticles generated. Other than that, HPLC provides more selective and specific measurement on the encapsulation efficiency, loading capacity and stability of plant extracts in NPs. Figure 4 summarizes the NPs characteristics and techniques used.
FIGURE 4
Limitations and Prospects
The antimicrobial activity of plant extracts loaded in NPs is still unclear, like some are emphasized on bacterial oxidative stress, whereas other NPs such as MgO-NPs may not be associated with bacterial metabolism (Wang et al., 2017). The lack of evidence of mechanism of action of plant extracts itself become a major issue in this review. Another limitation is the complex structure of microorganisms not permitted to be stimulated from in vitro study to in vivo condition. The environmental issue especially to fish and plankton population should be considered another limitation of NPs, due the release of NPs to the environment. The NPs will be ingested by aquatic organisms and be accumulated in animals and further in the food chain (Maharramov et al., 2019).
The combination of two metal or bimetallic nanoparticles in formulation plant extract may increase the antimicrobial activity. The successful bimetallic nanoparticle of Ag-Fe (AgNPs and FeNPs) has been produced using redox reactions of aqueous Gardenia jasminoides. It showed a synergistic effect as bactericidal and fungicidal effects against Gram-positive, Gram-negative and yeast (Padilla-Cruz et al., 2021). On the other hand, the hybrid silver-iron nanoparticle containing aminolevulinic acid showed significant enhancement in their cytotoxic activity on MCF-7 cell lines (). In the case of multidrug resistance, NPs seems to be an alternative strategy to deliver antimicrobial agents to fight numerous antibiotic resistance bacteria.
Conclusion
Metal nanoparticles alone have great potency as antimicrobial agents by showing different mechanisms of action. With the current development of drug delivery, the combination or green synthesis of natural products and in metal nanoparticles provide the advantage to produce synergistic activity of antimicrobial agents. Interestingly, there are not many purified compounds which possess antimicrobial agents that have been formulated with metal nanoparticles. It will give room to the researcher to do more research in this area. But this research would produce negative effects on the environment if not fully controlled. The use of uncontrolled metal nanoparticle can increase AMR incidents due to the effectiveness of metal nanoparticle in transformation of extracellular antibiotic resistant genes by 11-folds compared to the effects of antibiotics alone (Zhang et al., 2022).
Statements
Author contributions
The research was planned and designed by MT and DS. MT, DS, and MH conducted the research, write the draft of the manuscript. JK critically reviewed and improved the manuscript. MT, DS, and MH equally contributed to the manuscript. All authors played their own role in the manuscript preparation, reviewing and funding.
Funding
This research was funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia via Research Grant PDUPT for 2021-2022.
Conflict of interest
MH was employed by IKOP Pharma Sdn Bhd.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbbaszadeganA.GhahramaniY.GholamiA.HemmateenejadB.DorostkarS.NabavizadehM.et al (2015). The Effect of Charge at the Surface of Silver Nanoparticles on Antimicrobial Activity against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Preliminary Study. J. Nanomater.2015, 1–8. 10.1155/2015/720654
2
Abd El-MoatyH. I.SolimanN. A.HamadR. S.IsmailE. H.SabryD. Y.KhalilM. M. H. (2021). Comparative Therapeutic Effects of Pituranthos Tortuosus Aqueous Extract and Phyto-Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles on Helicobacter pylori, Diabetic and Cancer Proliferation. South Afr. J. Bot.139, 167–174. 10.1016/j.sajb.2021.02.009
3
AdavallanK.KrishnakumarN. (2014). Mulberry Leaf Extract Mediated Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and its Anti-bacterial Activity against Human Pathogens. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.5, 025018. 10.1088/2043-6262/5/2/025018
4
AhmadN.FoziaJabeenM.JabeenM.HaqZ. U.AhmadI.WahabA.et al (2022). Green Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles Using Euphorbia Serpens Kunth Aqueous Extract, Their Characterization, and Investigation of its In Vitro Antioxidative, Antimicrobial, Insecticidal, and Cytotoxic Activities. BioMed Res. Int.2022, 1–11. 10.1155/2022/5562849
5
Al-RadadiN. S. (2021). Facile One-step Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles (AuNp) Using Licorice Root Extract: Antimicrobial and Anticancer Study against HepG2 Cell Line. Arabian J. Chem.14, 102956. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.102956
6
AlarjaniK. M.HuessienD.RasheedR. A.KalaiyarasiM. (2022). Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Pisum Sativum L. (Pea) Pod against Multidrug Resistant Foodborne Pathogens. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci.34, 101897. 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101897
7
AljarbaN. H.ImtiazS.AnwarN.AlanaziI. S.AlkahtaniS. (2022). Anticancer and Microbial Activities of Gold Nanoparticles: A Mechanistic Review. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci.34, 101907. 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101907
8
AllafchianA.VahabiM. R.JalaliS. A. H.Saeid MahdaviS.SepahvandS.FarhangH. R. (2022). Design of Green Silver Nanoparticles Mediated by Ferula Ovina Boiss. Extract with Enhanced Antibacterial Effect. Chem. Phys. Lett.791, 139392. 10.1016/j.cplett.2022.139392
9
AnbumaniD.DhandapaniK. v.ManoharanJ.BabujanarthanamR.BashirA. K. H.MuthusamyK.et al (2022). Green Synthesis and Antimicrobial Efficacy of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Using Luffa acutangula Leaf Extract. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci.34, 101896. 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101896
10
Arockiya Aarthi RajathiF.ParthibanC.Ganesh KumarV.AnantharamanP. (2012). Biosynthesis of Antibacterial Gold Nanoparticles Using Brown Alga, Stoechospermum Marginatum (Kützing). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.99, 166–173. 10.1016/j.saa.2012.08.081
11
AsrafM. H.SaniN. S.WilliamsC. D.JemonK.MalekN. A. N. N. (2022). In Situ biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticle-Incorporated Synthesized Zeolite A Using Orthosiphon Aristatus Extract for In Vitro Antibacterial Wound Healing. Particuology67, 27–34. 10.1016/j.partic.2021.09.007
12
BaigN.KammakakamI.FalathW. (2021). Nanomaterials: a Review of Synthesis Methods, Properties, Recent Progress, and Challenges. Mat. Adv.2, 1821–1871. 10.1039/D0MA00807A
13
BalachandarR.NavaneethanR.BirunthaM.Ashok KumarK. K.GovarthananM.KarmegamN. (2022). Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Phytosynthesized from Glochidion Candolleanum Leaves. Mater. Lett.311, 131572. 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131572
14
BalasubramanianS.KalaS. M. J.PushparajT. L. (2020). Biogenic Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Jasminum Auriculatum Leaf Extract and Their Catalytic, Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.57, 101620. 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101620
15
BaliR.HarrisA. T. (2010). Biogenic Synthesis of Au Nanoparticles Using Vascular Plants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.49, 12762–12772. 10.1021/ie101600m
16
BeraS.MondalD. (2022). Antibacterial Efficacies of Nanostructured Aminoglycosides. ACS Omega7, 4724–4734. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04399
17
BiswasB.RogersK.McLaughlinF.DanielsD.YadavA. (2013). Antimicrobial Activities of Leaf Extracts of Guava (Psidium Guajava L.) on Two Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria. Int. J. Microbiol.2013, 746165–746167. 10.1155/2013/746165
18
BukhariA.IjazI.GilaniE.NazirA.ZainH.SaeedR.et al (2021). Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Different Plants' Parts for Antimicrobial Activity and Anticancer Activity: A Review Article. Coatings11, 1374. 10.3390/coatings11111374
19
ChauT. P.VeeraragavanG. R.NarayananM.ChinnathambiA.AlharbiS. A.SubramaniB.et al (2022). Green Synthesis of Zirconium Nanoparticles Using Punica Granatum (Pomegranate) Peel Extract and Their Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Potency. Environ. Res.209, 112771. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112771
20
CiriminnaR.FidalgoA.MeneguzzoF.PresentatoA.ScurriaA.NuzzoD.et al (2020). Pectin: A Long-Neglected Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial. ChemMedChem15, 2228–2235. 10.1002/cmdc.202000518
21
DaX.NishiyamaY.TieD.HeinK. Z.YamamotoO.MoritaE. (2019). Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of Action of Ou-Gon (Scutellaria Root Extract) Components against Pathogenic Fungi. Sci. Rep.9, 1683. 10.1038/s41598-019-38916-w
22
DakalT. C.KumarA.MajumdarR. S.YadavV. (2016). Mechanistic Basis of Antimicrobial Actions of Silver Nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol.7, 1831. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01831
23
de Oliveira GonçalvesK.VieiraD. P.LevyD.BydlowskiS. P.CourrolL. C. (2020). Uptake of Silver, Gold, and Hybrids Silver-Iron, Gold-Iron and Silver-Gold Aminolevulinic Acid Nanoparticles by MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther.32, 102080. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102080
24
DeivanathanS. K.PrakashJ. T. J. (2022). Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Leaf Extract of Guettarda Speciosa and its Antimicrobial and Anti-oxidative Properties. Chem. Data Collect.38, 100831. 10.1016/j.cdc.2022.100831
25
DikshitP.KumarJ.DasA.SadhuS.SharmaS.SinghS.et al (2021). Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles: Applications and Limitations. Catalysts11, 902. 10.3390/catal11080902
26
DorostiN.JamshidiF. (2016). Plant-mediated Gold Nanoparticles by Dracocephalum Kotschyi as Anticholinesterase Agent: Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of Anticancer and Antibacterial Activity. Jab14, 235–245. 10.1016/j.jab.2016.03.001
27
DridiR.EssghaierB.HannachiH.KhedherG. B.ChaffeiC.ZidM. F. (2022). Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Anagallis Monelli: Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity, Antibacterial and Antifungal Effects. J. Mol. Struct.1251, 132076. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.132076
28
ElishaI. L.BothaF. S.McGawL. J.EloffJ. N. (2017). The Antibacterial Activity of Extracts of Nine Plant Species with Good Activity against Escherichia coli against Five Other Bacteria and Cytotoxicity of Extracts. BMC Complement. Altern. Med.17, 133. 10.1186/s12906-017-1645-z
29
EmamH. E.ZahranM. K.AhmedH. B. (2017). Generation of Biocompatible Nanogold Using H 2 O 2 -starch and Their Catalytic/antimicrobial Activities. Eur. Polym. J.90, 354–367. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.03.034
30
FullerM.WhileyH.KöperI. (2020). Antibiotic Delivery Using Gold Nanoparticles. SN Appl. Sci.2, 1022. 10.1007/s42452-020-2835-8
31
Gardea-TorresdeyJ. L.ParsonsJ. G.GomezE.Peralta-VideaJ.TroianiH. E.SantiagoP.et al (2002). Formation and Growth of Au Nanoparticles inside Live Alfalfa Plants. Nano Lett.2, 397–401. 10.1021/nl015673+
32
GordonO.Vig SlentersT.BrunettoP. S.VillaruzA. E.SturdevantD. E.OttoM.et al (2010). Silver Coordination Polymers for Prevention of Implant Infection: Thiol Interaction, Impact on Respiratory Chain Enzymes, and Hydroxyl Radical Induction. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.54, 4208–4218. 10.1128/AAC.01830-09
33
GovindarajuK.VasantharajaR.Uma SuganyaK. S.AnbarasuS.RevathyK.PugazhendhiA.et al (2020). Unveiling the Anticancer and Antimycobacterial Potentials of Bioengineered Gold Nanoparticles. Process Biochem.96, 213–219. 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.06.016
34
GulianiA.KumariA.AcharyaA. (2021). Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Leaf Extract of Populus Alba: Characterization, Antibacterial and Dye Degradation Activity. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.18, 4007–4018. 10.1007/s13762-020-03065-5
35
HagbaniT. A.YadavH.MoinA.LilaA. S. A.MehmoodK.AlshammariF.et al (2022). Enhancement of Vancomycin Potential against Pathogenic Bacterial Strains via Gold Nano-Formulations: A Nano-Antibiotic Approach. Mater. (Basel)15, 1108. 10.3390/ma15031108
36
HammamiI.AlabdallahN. M.jomaaA. A.kamounM. (2021). Gold Nanoparticles: Synthesis Properties and Applications. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci.33, 101560. 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101560
37
HashemiZ.MizwariZ. M.Mohammadi-AghdamS.Mortazavi-DerazkolaS.Ali EbrahimzadehM. (2022a). Sustainable Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Sambucus Ebulus Phenolic Extract (AgNPs@SEE): Optimization and Assessment of Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange and Their In Vitro Antibacterial and Anticancer Activity. Arabian J. Chem.15, 103525. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103525
38
HashemiZ.Shirzadi-AhodashtiM.Mortazavi-DerazkolaS.EbrahimzadehM. A. (2022b). Sustainable Biosynthesis of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles Using Barberry Phenolic Extract: Optimization and Evaluation of Photocatalytic, In Vitro Cytotoxicity, and Antibacterial Activities against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Inorg. Chem. Commun.139, 109320. 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109320
39
HeZ.HuangZ.JiangW.ZhouW. (2019). Antimicrobial Activity of Cinnamaldehyde on Streptococcus Mutans Biofilms. Front. Microbiol.10, 2241. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02241
40
HuX.WuL.DuM.WangL. (2022). Eco-friendly Synthesis of Size-Controlled Silver Nanoparticles by Using Areca Catechu Nut Aqueous Extract and Investigation of Their Potent Antioxidant and Anti-bacterial Activities. Arabian J. Chem.15, 103763. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103763
41
JavedR.ZiaM.NazS.AisidaS. O.AinN. U.AoQ. (2020). Role of Capping Agents in the Application of Nanoparticles in Biomedicine and Environmental Remediation: Recent Trends and Future Prospects. J. Nanobiotechnology18, 172. 10.1186/s12951-020-00704-4
42
JeevanandamJ.ChanY. S.DanquahM. K. (2016). Biosynthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. ChemBioEng Rev.3, 55–67. 10.1002/cben.201500018
43
KalpanaV. N.Devi RajeswariV. (2018). A Review on Green Synthesis, Biomedical Applications, and Toxicity Studies of ZnO NPs. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl.2018, 3569758. 10.1155/2018/3569758
44
KaplanÖ.Gökşen TosunN.İmamoğluR.Türkekulİ.Gökçeİ.ÖzgürA. (2022). Biosynthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles from Tricholoma Ustale and Agaricus Arvensis Extracts and Investigation of Their Antimicrobial, Cytotoxic, and Apoptotic Potentials. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.69, 103178. 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103178
45
KhamenehB.IranshahyM.SoheiliV.Fazly BazzazB. S. (2019). Review on Plant Antimicrobials: a Mechanistic Viewpoint. Antimicrob. Resist Infect. Control8, 118. 10.1186/s13756-019-0559-6
46
KhanA. U.KhanM.KhanM. M. (2019). Antifungal and Antibacterial Assay by Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized from Aqueous Leaf Extract of Trigonella Foenum-Graecum. BioNanoSci.9, 597–602. 10.1007/s12668-019-00643-x
47
KhanH. A.AhmadA.MehboobR. (2015). Nosocomial Infections and Their Control Strategies. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed.5, 509–514. 10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.05.001
48
KimJ.Ha Quang BaoT.ShinY. K.KimK. Y. (2018). Antifungal Activity of Magnoflorine against Candida Strains. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.34, 167. 10.1007/s11274-018-2549-x
49
KueteV.FozingD. C.KapcheW. F.MbavengA. T.KuiateJ. R.NgadjuiB. T.et al (2009). Antimicrobial Activity of the Methanolic Extract and Compounds from Morus Mesozygia Stem Bark. J. Ethnopharmacol.124, 551–555. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.05.004
50
KuppusamyP.YusoffM. M.ManiamG. P.GovindanN. (2016). Biosynthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles Using Plant Derivatives and Their New Avenues in Pharmacological Applications - an Updated Report. Saudi Pharm. J.24, 473–484. 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.11.013
51
KurtjakM.VukomanovićM.SuvorovD. (2017). Antibacterial Nanocomposite of Functionalized Nanogold and Gallium-Doped Hydroxyapatite. Mater. Lett.193, 126–129. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.092
52
LashinI. I.ArefM. S.Abd El-KaderE. M.HeussinE. A.EwaisE. E.-D. A. (2021). Antimicrobial and In-Vitro Cytotoxic Efficacy of Betulinic Acid from the Callus, Regeneration, and Mother Plant of Dillenia Indica L. Egypt. J. Bot.62, 213–226. 10.21608/ejbo.2021.81121.170610.21608/ejbo.2021.81121.1706
53
LeeJ.LeeD. G. (2015). Novel Antifungal Mechanism of Resveratrol: Apoptosis Inducer in Candida Albicans. Curr. Microbiol.70, 383–389. 10.1007/s00284-014-0734-1
54
LiZ. J.LiuM.DawutiG.DouQ.MaY.LiuH. G.et al (2017). Antifungal Activity of Gallic Acid In Vitro and In Vivo. Phytother. Res.31, 1039–1045. 10.1002/ptr.5823
55
LoganathanS.SelvamK.PadmavathiG.ShivakumarM. S.Senthil-NathanS.SumathiA. G.et al (2022). Biological Synthesis and Characterization of Passiflora Subpeltata Ortega Aqueous Leaf Extract in Silver Nanoparticles and Their Evaluation of Antibacterial, Antioxidant, Anti-cancer and Larvicidal Activities. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci.34, 101846. 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101846
56
LosassoC.BellucoS.CibinV.ZavagninP.MičetićI.GallocchioF.et al (2014). Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles: Sensitivity of Different Salmonella Serovars. Front. Microbiol.5, 227. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00227
57
LubisF. A.MalekN. A. N. N.SaniN. S.JemonK. (2022). Biogenic Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Persicaria Odorata Leaf Extract: Antibacterial, Cytocompatibility, and In Vitro Wound Healing Evaluation. Particuology70, 10–19. 10.1016/j.partic.2022.01.001
58
MaharramovA. M.HasanovaU. A.SuleymanovaI. A.OsmanovaG. E.HajiyevaN. E. (2019). The Engineered Nanoparticles in Food Chain: Potential Toxicity and Effects. SN Appl. Sci.1, 1362. 10.1007/s42452-019-1412-5
59
MakvandiP.WangC. y.ZareE. N.BorzacchielloA.NiuL. n.TayF. R. (2020). Metal‐Based Nanomaterials in Biomedical Applications: Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity Aspects. Adv. Funct. Mat.30, 1910021. 10.1002/adfm.201910021
60
MalikP.ShankarR.MalikV.SharmaN.MukherjeeT. K. (2014). Green Chemistry Based Benign Routes for Nanoparticle Synthesis. J. Nanoparticles2014, 1–14. 10.1155/2014/302429
61
ManjunathH. M.JoshiC. G.DanagoudarA.PoyyaJ.KudvaA. K.DhanajayaB. L. (2017). Biogenic Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles by Marine Endophytic Fungus-Cladosporium Cladosporioides Isolated from Seaweed and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties. Process Biochem.63, 137–144. 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.09.008
62
MarslinG.SiramK.MaqboolQ.SelvakesavanR.KruszkaD.KachlickiP.et al (2018). Secondary Metabolites in the Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles. Materials11, 940. 10.3390/ma11060940
63
MojallyM.SharminE.ObaidN. A.AlhindiY.AbdallaA. N. (2022). Polyvinyl Alcohol/corn Starch/castor Oil Hydrogel Films, Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized in Mentha Piperita Leaves' Extract. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci.34, 101879. 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101879
64
MondalA.ChowdhuryS.MondalN. K.ShaikhW. A.DebnathP.ChakrabortyS. (2022). Insecticidal and Fungicidal Performance of Bio-Fabricated Silver and Gold Nanoparticles. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.19, 1573–1592. 10.1007/s13762-021-03181-w
65
MourdikoudisS.PallaresR. M.ThanhN. T. K. (2018). Characterization Techniques for Nanoparticles: Comparison and Complementarity upon Studying Nanoparticle Properties. Nanoscale10, 12871–12934. 10.1039/C8NR02278J
66
MuhammadM. H.IdrisA. L.FanX.GuoY.YuY.JinX.et al (2020). Beyond Risk: Bacterial Biofilms and Their Regulating Approaches. Front. Microbiol.11, 928. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00928
67
MunitaJ. M.AriasC. A. (2016). Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol. Spectr.4, 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0016-2015. 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0016-2015
68
MuniyappanN.PandeeswaranM.AmalrajA. (2021). Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Curcuma Pseudomontana Isolated Curcumin: Its Characterization, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anti- Inflammatory Activities. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol.3, 117–124. 10.1016/j.enceco.2021.01.002
69
MuthukumarT.SudhakumariSambandamB.SambandamB.AravinthanA.SastryT. P.KimJ.-H. (2016). Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Enhanced Synergistic Antitumor Activity Using HepG2 and MCF7 Cells and its Antibacterial Effects. Process Biochem.51, 384–391. 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.12.017
70
NaseerM.AslamU.KhalidB.ChenB. (2020). Green Route to Synthesize Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extracts of Cassia Fistula and Melia Azadarach and Their Antibacterial Potential. Sci. Rep.10, 9055. 10.1038/s41598-020-65949-3
71
NizamovS.SazdovskaS. D.MirskyV. M. (2022). A Review of Optical Methods for Ultrasensitive Detection and Characterization of Nanoparticles in Liquid Media with a Focus on the Wide Field Surface Plasmon Microscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta1204, 339633. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339633
72
OkonE.Kukula-KochW.HalasaM.JarzabA.BaranM.Dmoszynska-GraniczkaM.et al (2020). Magnoflorine-Isolation and the Anticancer Potential against NCI-H1299 Lung, MDA-MB-468 Breast, T98G Glioma, and TE671 Rhabdomyosarcoma Cancer Cells. Biomolecules10, 1532. 10.3390/biom10111532
73
Padilla-CruzA. L.Garza-CervantesJ. A.Vasto-AnzaldoX. G.García-RivasG.León-BuitimeaA.Morones-RamírezJ. R. (2021). Synthesis and Design of Ag-Fe Bimetallic Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Synergistic Combination Therapies against Clinically Relevant Pathogens. Sci. Rep.11, 5351. 10.1038/s41598-021-84768-8
74
PeixotoL. R.RosalenP. L.FerreiraG. L.FreiresI. A.de CarvalhoF. G.CastellanoL. R.et al (2017). Antifungal Activity, Mode of Action and Anti-biofilm Effects of Laurus Nobilis Linnaeus Essential Oil against Candida Spp. Arch. Oral Biol.73, 179–185. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.10.013
75
Peralta-VideaJ. R.HuangY.ParsonsJ. G.ZhaoL.Lopez-MorenoL.Hernandez-ViezcasJ. A.et al (2016). Plant-based Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles: Scientific Curiosity or a Realistic Alternative to Chemical Synthesis?Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng.1, 4. 10.1007/s41204-016-0004-5
76
PerveenS.NadeemR.RehmanS. u.AfzalN.AnjumS.NoreenS.et al (2022). Green Synthesis of Iron (Fe) Nanoparticles Using Plumeria Obtusa Extract as a Reducing and Stabilizing Agent: Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Biocompatibility Studies. Arabian J. Chem.15, 103764. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103764
77
PuljulaE.WaltonG.WoodwardM. J.KaronenM. (2020). Antimicrobial Activities of Ellagitannins against Clostridiales Perfringens, Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus Plantarum and Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules25, 3714. 10.3390/molecules25163714
78
QingY.ChengL.LiR.LiuG.ZhangY.TangX.et al (2018). Potential Antibacterial Mechanism of Silver Nanoparticles and the Optimization of Orthopedic Implants by Advanced Modification Technologies. Int. J. Nanomedicine13, 3311–3327. 10.2147/IJN.S165125
79
RamakritinanC. M.KaarunyaE.ShankarS.KumaraguruA. K. (2013). Antibacterial Effects of Ag, Au and Bimetallic (Ag-Au) Nanoparticles Synthesized from Red Algae. SSP201, 211–230. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.201.211
80
RaufA.AhmadT.KhanA.MaryamUddinG.UddinG.AhmadB.et al (2021). Green Synthesis and Biomedicinal Applications of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Functionalized with Methanolic Extract of Mentha Longifolia. Artif. Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol.49, 194–203. 10.1080/21691401.2021.1890099
81
SaltonM. R. J.KimK.-S. (1996). “Structure,” in Medical Microbiology. Editors BaronS.. (Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch). Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8477/ (Accessed March 12, 2022).
82
SamimiS.MaghsoudniaN.EftekhariR. B.DorkooshF. (2019). “Lipid-Based Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Systems,” in Characterization and Biology of Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 47–76. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814031-4.00003-9
83
SenthamaraiM. D.MalaikozhundanB. (2022). Synergistic Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Using the Unripe Fruit Extract of Aegle Marmelos (L.) - Antibacterial, Antibiofilm, Radical Scavenging and Ecotoxicological Effects. Mater. Today Commun.30, 103228. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103228
84
ShabanS.PatelM.AhmadA. (2020). Improved Efficacy of Antifungal Drugs in Combination with Monoterpene Phenols against Candida Auris. Sci. Rep.10, 1162. 10.1038/s41598-020-58203-3
85
ShafeyA. M. E. (2020). Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles from Plant Leaf Extracts and Their Applications: A Review. Green Process. Synthesis9, 304–339. 10.1515/gps-2020-0031
86
ShangZ. C.HanC.XuJ. L.LiuR. H.YinY.WangX. B.et al (2019). Twelve Formyl Phloroglucinol Meroterpenoids from the Leaves of Eucalyptus Robusta. Phytochemistry163, 111–117. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.04.008
87
ShkodenkoL.KassirovI.KoshelE. (2020). Metal Oxide Nanoparticles against Bacterial Biofilms: Perspectives and Limitations. Microorganisms8, 1545. 10.3390/microorganisms8101545
88
SinghJ.DuttaT.KimK. H.RawatM.SamddarP.KumarP. (2018). 'Green' Synthesis of Metals and Their Oxide Nanoparticles: Applications for Environmental Remediation. J. Nanobiotechnology16, 84. 10.1186/s12951-018-0408-4
89
SinghS.FatimaZ.HameedS. (2016). Citronellal-induced Disruption of Membrane Homeostasis in Candida Albicans and Attenuation of its Virulence Attributes. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop.49, 465–472. 10.1590/0037-8682-0190-2016
90
SongJ. Y.KimB. S. (2009). Rapid Biological Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Plant Leaf Extracts. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.32, 79–84. 10.1007/s00449-008-0224-6
91
SriramuluM.ShanmugamS.PonnusamyV. K. (2020). Agaricus Bisporus Mediated Biosynthesis of Copper Nanoparticles and its Biological Effects: An In-Vitro Study. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun.35, 100254. 10.1016/j.colcom.2020.100254
92
StanD.EnciuA. M.MateescuA. L.IonA. C.BrezeanuA. C.StanD.et al (2021). Natural Compounds with Antimicrobial and Antiviral Effect and Nanocarriers Used for Their Transportation. Front. Pharmacol.12, 723233. 10.3389/fphar.2021.723233
93
SunderamV.ThiyagarajanD.LawrenceA. V.MohammedS. S. S.SelvarajA. (2019). In-vitro Antimicrobial and Anticancer Properties of Green Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles Using Anacardium Occidentale Leaves Extract. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.26, 455–459. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.12.001
94
SunkariS.GangapuramB. R.DadigalaR.BandiR.AlleM.GuttenaV. (2017). Microwave-irradiated Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles for Catalytic and Anti-bacterial Activity. J. Anal. Sci. Technol.8, 13. 10.1186/s40543-017-0121-1
95
ThangamaniN.BhuvaneshwariN. (2019). Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Simarouba Glauca Leaf Extract and Their Biological Activity of Micro-organism. Chem. Phys. Lett.732, 136587. 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.07.015
96
VinayS. P.UdayabhanuSumedhaH. N.SumedhaH. N.ShashankM.NagarajuG.ChandrasekharN. (2021). In-vitro Antibacterial, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Potential of Gold Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Novel Elaeocarpus Ganitrus Seeds Extract. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices6, 127–133. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.09.008
97
WangD. G.LiuW. Y.ChenG. T. (2013). A Simple Method for the Isolation and Purification of Resveratrol from Polygonum Cuspidatum. J. Pharm. Anal.3, 241–247. 10.1016/j.jpha.2012.12.001
98
WangL.HuC.ShaoL. (2017). The Antimicrobial Activity of Nanoparticles: Present Situation and Prospects for the Future. Int. J. Nanomedicine12, 1227–1249. 10.2147/IJN.S121956
99
WylieM. R.WindhamI. H.BlumF. C.WuH.MerrellD. S. (2022). In Vitro antibacterial Activity of Nimbolide against Helicobacter pylori. J. Ethnopharmacol.285, 114828. 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114828
100
YeL.CaoZ.LiuX.CuiZ.LiZ.LiangY.et al (2022). Noble Metal-Based Nanomaterials as Antibacterial Agents. J. Alloys Compd.904, 164091. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164091
101
YonathanK.MannR.MahbubK. R.GunawanC. (2022). The Impact of Silver Nanoparticles on Microbial Communities and Antibiotic Resistance Determinants in the Environment. Environ. Pollut.293, 118506. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118506
102
ZayedM. F.MahfozeR. A.El-kousyS. M.Al-AshkarE. A. (2020). In-vitro Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Metal Nanoparticles Biosynthesized Using Optimized Pimpinella Anisum Extract. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects585, 124167. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124167
103
ZhangD.MaX. L.GuY.HuangH.ZhangG. W. (2020). Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Potential Applications to Treat Cancer. Front. Chem.8, 799. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00799
104
ZhangS.LuJ.WangY.VerstraeteW.YuanZ.GuoJ. (2022). Insights of Metallic Nanoparticles and Ions in Accelerating the Bacterial Uptake of Antibiotic Resistance Genes. J. Hazard Mater421, 126728. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126728
105
ZhengK.SetyawatiM. I.LimT. P.LeongD. T.XieJ. (2016). Antimicrobial Cluster Bombs: Silver Nanoclusters Packed with Daptomycin. ACS Nano10, 7934–7942. 10.1021/acsnano.6b03862
Summary
Keywords
antimicrobial, nanoparticles, gold nanoparticle, silver nanoparticle, natural products, green synthesis
Citation
Susanti D, Haris MS, Taher M and Khotib J (2022) Natural Products-Based Metallic Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents. Front. Pharmacol. 13:895616. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.895616
Received
14 March 2022
Accepted
04 May 2022
Published
02 June 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Mukhlesur Rahman, University of East London, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Hamed Barabadi, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Maria De Lourdes Pereira, University of Aveiro, Portugal
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Susanti, Haris, Taher and Khotib.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Deny Susanti, deny@iium.edu.my; Muhammad Salahuddin Haris, solah@iium.edu.my; Muhammad Taher, mtaher@iium.edu.my; Junaidi Khotib, junaidi-k@ff.unair.ac.id
This article was submitted to Ethnopharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.