Abstract
Nowadays, lung cancer is still the deadliest oncological disease in the world. Among them, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%∼85% of all lung cancers, and its 5-year survival rate is less than 15%, making the situation critical. In the past decades, despite some clinical advances in conventional treatments, the overall survival rate of NSCLC is still not optimistic due to its unique physiological conditions and the frequent occurrence of tumor escape. In recent years, immunotherapy has become a new hot spot in lung cancer research, including antibody therapy and cell therapy, which have been developed and utilized one after another, especially immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). These approaches have effectively improved the overall survival rate and objective response rate of NSCLC patients by enhancing the immune capacity of the body and targeting tumor cells more effectively, which is more specific and less toxic compared with conventional chemotherapy, and providing more strategies for NSCLC treatment. In this paper, we reviewed the relevant targets, clinical progress and adverse reaction in monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, ICI, bispecific antibodies, T-cell receptor engineered T cell therapy (TCR-T), Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy (CAR-T), and also report on their combination therapy from the immune-related background to provide better NSCLC treatment and prospective.
Introduction
Lung cancer is the deadliest malignancy in the world with 2.2 million new cases and about 1.8 million deaths in 2020 (Sung et al., 2021). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80∼85% of the total number of lung cancers and is the main cause of mortality (Siegel et al., 2020). Unlike other cancers, smoking and secondhand smoke lead to a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) in lung cancer, while the unique oxygen environment and pressure strengthen the role of molecular heterogeneity, and NSCLC is more likely to develop drug resistance, drug toxicity and cancer migration (Zito Marino et al., 2019). Clinically, only a small proportion of NSCLC patients are diagnosed at an early stage, and most of them are in the advanced or even metastatic stage, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 15% (Allemani et al., 2018). Conventional treatments for NSCLC are usually administered in the staged approaches, with complete surgical resection, usually a lobectomy, being recommended in the early stages (Saji et al., 2022), and stereotactic and hyper-fractionated radiation therapy may be considered for patients who are apprehensive about surgery (Tandberg et al., 2018; Chang et al., 2021; Dohopolski et al., 2021). Platinum-based combination chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy are commonly used for patients with advanced NSCLC (Vinod and Hau, 2020; Zhou et al., 2022). Percutaneous treatments such as thermal ablation as well as radiofrequency ablation can be used as a prognostic and maintenance treatment to the above treatments (Duma et al., 2019). Although these treatments have improved the survival rate of NSCLC patients, an important cause of death in lung cancer is due to the etiology or tendency of metastatic disease already present at the time of diagnosis and treatment, which cannot be effectively contained and treated by conventional means, suggesting that further survival improvement requires more effective approaches. The emerging immunotherapy in recent years has better potential to prevent cancer recurrence and metastasis by improving the patient’s own immune capacity and killing cancer cells specifically, raising the patient’s expectations for treatment. This article will discuss immunotherapy for NSCLC and related developments.
Immune circulation and microenvironment in NSCLC
The body’s immune system is self-generated for the elimination of cancer cells and is a set of recyclable operations. The first is that cancer cells release the corresponding antigen, which is taken up by dendritic cells, and the antigen forms a complex with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on the surface of dendritic cells; then dendritic cells present the antigen to T cells, when MHC and T cell receptor (TCR) bind, B7 protein on the surface of antigen-presenting cells binds to CD28 on the surface of T cells, and double signals stimulate T cell activation (Figure 1); Activated T cells come to the tumor tissue through the circulation and penetration; effector T cells specifically bind and kill cancer cells; dead cancer cells release more antigen to recruit more T cells (Chen and Mellman, 2013). Theoretically, this cycle will amplify the immune response, but in reality, the process does not occur as expected in cancer patients, because in order to prevent the occurrence of autoimmunity, the body’s multiple steps of this cycle are regulated and balanced in many aspects, and cancer cells use these regulations for immune escape. These phenomena occur during the antigen presentation stage, with down-regulation of MHC, decreased phagocytosis by IL-10-polarized macrophages, and release of more immunosuppressive factors (Pio et al., 2019); during the activation of T cells, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) competitively binds to B7 molecules and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) binding to programmed death-1 (PD-1) all inhibit T cells (Chen and Mellman, 2017); and during the infiltration stage of tumor tissue, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production of vascular structures and transforming growth factor-β expression all reduce invasion (Lee et al., 2020). By inhibiting the expression of the above molecules, it is the theoretical basis for immunotherapy of lung cancer.
FIGURE 1
The growth and characteristics of NSCLC are closely related to the tumor microenvironment (TME), which includes the non-immune microenvironment and the immune microenvironment, and their interactions influence the course of the disease and the role of therapy (Binnewies et al., 2018). The non-immune microenvironment includes extracellular matrix, fibroblasts, and the vascular system. Extracellular matrix and fibroblasts provide some structural help for tumor cells, and more importantly, it contains adhesion components, which physically affect the migration of tumor cells (Walker et al., 2018), while vascular endothelial cells will build a large number of new blood vessels at the tumor site and provide oxygen and nutrient substance for tumor development (Ferrara and Adamis, 2016); at the same time, tumor cells can secrete chemokines, which can recruit neutrophils and bind to them, and the process will not only promote angiogenesis but also may play a negative role in tumor prognosis (Zhang et al., 2019). The immune microenvironment is complex, including T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, natural killer cells, macrophages and dendritic cells (Stankovic et al., 2018), among which regulatory T cells (Tregs) and related macrophages are more special and may produce immunosuppression during the development of NSCLC (Xie et al., 2020). Tregs, a subpopulation of T lymphocytes, express large amounts of CTLA-4 on their surface and can inhibit T cells by secreting suppressors or directly mediate the killing of effector cells. Under the action of chemokines, Tregs highly infiltrate around cancer cell tissues, that result in a strong immunosuppressive effect (Frankel et al., 2017). Tumor-associated macrophages, on the other hand, infiltrate near tumor cells through chemokines and produce polarization. Polarized macrophages express the immunosuppressive factor IL-10 as well as VEGF, resulting in vascular endothelial remodeling and concomitant migration (Wang et al., 2021). Therefore, the regulation of T cells, tumor-associated macrophages and the inhibition of VEGF could be an important means of treating cell lung cancer.
Antibody therapy in NSCLC
Monoclonal antibodies
Immunotherapy has been used in cancer therapy as early as the late 18th century (Loughlin and Coley, 2020), but there has been a lack of antibodies with high purity and specificity. In the late 20th century, hybridoma technology was born, which fuses B cells that specifically express antibodies with myeloma cells that can proliferate indefinitely in vitro (Parray et al., 2020). The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) produced by hybridoma cells are of high purity and specificity, which greatly meet the needs of immunotherapy. In the last half century, mAbs have been developed rapidly, from the birth of hybridoma technology to the realization of fully human antibody technology, mAbs have become an important tool for cancer treatment (Waldmann, 2019).
Antibodies are usually composed of two identical light chains and two identical heavy chains linked by disulfide bonds. Due to the differences in heavy chains (α, δ, ε, γ and μ), antibodies can be classified into five categories: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgM and IgG. Among these five classes of antibodies, IgG accounts for 80% of human serum and almost all antibodies approved for use are IgG (Goulet and Atkins, 2020). IgG can be further divided into IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, which differ in the length of their hinge regions and the number of disulfide bonds, and more importantly, in their Fc functions. For example, IgG1 and IgG3 have a strong binding capacity to FcγR and can induce stronger antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), while IgG2 and IgG4 have weak binding activity. Unlike other isoforms, IgG4 is completely unable to bind C1q to induce complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). In addition, IgG3 has no binding ability to FcRn, resulting in a half-life that is only one-third that of the other isoforms (Yu et al., 2020). Therefore, it is crucial to select the appropriate antibody type according to the therapeutic need and the target of action.
In contrast to conventional therapies, antibodies not only kill cancer cells, but their Fab ends also bind to specific host targets to exert their corresponding effects.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is a breakthrough therapy for NSCLC in recent years, and James P. Allison and Tasuku Honjo won the Nobel Prize in Medical Physiology as discoverers in 2018. ICI does not have a direct killing effect on cancer cells, but works by enhancing or restoring the patient’s autoimmune capacity (Li et al., 2019). Immune checkpoints are proteins on the surface of T cells that can negatively regulate immune switch and intensity, including CTLA-4 and PD-1 (Wei et al., 2018), whose purpose is supposed to control the immune response to protect the body from autoimmunity (Figure 1). Blockade of immune checkpoints relieves T cells of their braking signals, thus allowing T cells to continue their effects. Several ICIs have been used for NSCLC, but not every patient has responded well to them. The selection and detection of markers may play an important role, including biometric parameters of the tumor and relevant markers from blood sampling (Brueckl et al., 2020). In addition to combination with conventional chemotherapy, combination with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may be a physiologically based approach, as radiation therapy suppresses the body’s proper immune response (Vansteenkiste et al., 2019).
Antibody–drug conjugates
Most mAbs do not have antitumor activity in combination with antigen, even though they possess good specificity. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) refer to the conjugation of antibodies to deliver highly toxic cargoes (payloads). Commonly used payloads today include calicheamicin and SN-38 against DNA and auristatins and maytansinoids against tubulins (Chau et al., 2019). Such antibodies with payloads specifically recognize and bind antigens and enter the cytosol by endocytosis, followed by the breakdown of the antigen-antibody-drug complex by a number of hydrolases and fibrinolytic enzymes, leading to the release of the drug intracellularly, thus providing a therapeutic effect (Hafeez et al., 2020) (Figure 1). In recent years, with the rapid development of ADCs, they have also shown good efficacy in the field of NSCLC. The main targets involved include human epidermal growth factor 2 (Her2), human epidermal growth factor 2 (Her3), and tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (Trop-2), which are all in the clinical trial stage (Desai et al., 2022).
ADCs are a very successful form of drug delivery with both the specificity of immunotherapy and the powerful efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents, and their use can be foreseen in NSCLC. However, in the clinical phase of the drug, some adverse reactions due to the carriage of highly toxic substances have been identified. In the trastuzumab deruxtecan clinical trial, 19% of patients developed neutropenia and 26% developed associated lung disease to the point of death in two patients; patritumab deruxtecan may cause hematologic toxicity; and sacituzumab govitecan caused neutropenia in nearly 1/3 of patients (Heist et al., 2017; Jänne et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022). Therefore, it may be important to balance the relationship between antibodies and poisons, and the combination of other targets and other drugs may further improve the therapeutic effect.
Antibody fragment
The development and utilization of antibody fragments may be a reliable way to address both efficacy and toxicity. Antibody fragments are classified as natural Fab and F (ab')2 and genetically engineered scFv, minibody, single-domain antibody, etc (Kholodenko et al., 2019). They retain the specificity to bind antigen, while the major difference from the common IgG-like mAbs is the absence of Fc structure. This leads to two advantages, on the one hand, a smaller molecular weight for better infiltration of the tumor microenvironment and passage through the blood-brain barrier, and on the other hand, the absence of Fc-mediated ADCC and CDC effects, which may be responsible for immunotoxicity (Chen et al., 2020). FDA has approved some antibody fragments to act in advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia, North American rattlesnake venom infection, etc (Kantarjian et al., 2017; Cuker et al., 2019; Wilson et al., 2022). However, no antibody fragments have been approved for cancer therapy, including NSCLC. The structural advantages of antibody fragments cannot be ignored, and breakthroughs are being made with antibody fragment-drug conjugates (AFDCs) based on antibody fragments (Liu et al., 2019a; Jolivet et al., 2022), while clinical trials have been conducted for NSCLC (NCT01221675).
Bispecific antibodies
The above mAbs have good specificity and are important tools for the therapy of NSCLC, but in the face of the complex TME and pathogenesis of NSCLC, a single target often fails to show satisfactory effects in vivo (Jänne et al., 2022), and bispecific antibodies can play a bridging or coordinating role against two epitopes in the immune microenvironment of NSCLC, showing great promise (Labrijn et al., 2019). At the same time, bispecific antibodies have better stability as well as lower side effects compared to co-formulation or simultaneous drug delivery because they are single molecules (Wang et al., 2019a). Bispecific antibodies can be broadly classified into two categories, one based on antibody fragment design and the other based on IgG-like design. Bispecific antibodies based on IgG-like design have cytotoxic presence and longer half-life due to the presence of Fc, but are prone to mismatching during production; in contrast, bispecific antibodies based on antibody fragment design have better tissue penetration and do not mismatch (Register et al., 2021).
Targets
Epidermal growth factor receptor
In NSCLC, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations as its important oncogenic pathway have been identified (Ye et al., 2021). The physiological role of EGFR is to regulate epithelial cell function (Sigismund et al., 2018), and mutated EGFR is aberrantly expressed to trigger cancer, and such mutations are found in more than half of Asian NSCLC patients (Lu et al., 2021). EGFR is a human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family receptor and a tyrosine kinase receptor (Liu et al., 2017). Correspondingly designed antibodies can block its ligand EGF from binding to it, thereby inhibiting EGFR phosphorylation and activation of downstream signaling for therapeutic purposes. Necitumumab is a fully humanized anti-EGFR mAb, which blocks its downstream pathway activation as well as dimerization by binding to the EGFR receptor (Thakur and Wozniak, 2017). Degradation of EGFR as well as ADCC effect can be clearly seen using necitumumab in NSCLC cells (Genova and Hirsch, 2016; Díaz-Serrano et al., 2019). Necitumumab in combination with chemotherapy can prolong survival by nearly 10 months in NSCLC patients with high EGFR expression (Thatcher et al., 2015) and has been approved as a first-line method for the treatment of advanced NSCLC (Table 1). However, it is inevitable that drug resistance develops after 10 months of medication, and some experiments have demonstrated that EGFR resistance achieves tumor escape by up-regulating PD-L1 expression (Figure 1) and inhibiting T cells (Peng et al., 2019). Therefore, the combination of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and EGFR mAbs may be a promising approach in the face of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations that are high in PD-L1 expression (Yamada et al., 2019).
TABLE 1
| Drug | Combination | Target | Study population | Stage | Toxicity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Necitumumab | with gemcitabine and cisplatin | EGFR | metastatic squamous NSCLC | FDA Approved (2015) | Skin rash, hypomagnesemia | Díaz-Serrano et al. (2019) |
| Bevacizumab | with carboplatin and paclitaxel | VEGF | non-squamous NSCLC | FDA Approved (2004) | Gastrointestinal perforation, pulmonary hemorrhage | Russo et al. (2017) |
| Ramucirumab | with docetaxel versus placebo and docetaxel | VEGF | Stage IV NSCLC after platinum-based therapy | FDA Approved (2014) | Fatigue, neutropenia | Garon et al. (2014) |
| Trastuzumab deruxtecan | HER2 | metastatic HER2 mutation NSCLC | Clinical Phase II (NCT03505710) | Neutropenia, interstitial lung disease | Li et al. (2022) | |
| Patritumab deruxtecan | with EGFR TKI | HER3 | locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC | Clinical Phase I (U31402-A-U102) | hematologic toxicities | Jänne et al. (2022) |
| Sacituzumab govitecan | Trop-2 | metastatic stage IV NSCLC | Clinical Phase I (NCT01631552) | Neutropenia, diarrhea | Heist et al. (2017) | |
| Ipilimumab | with Nivolumab | CTLA-4 | Advanced NSCLC | Clinical Phase Ⅲ (NCT02477826) | skin reactions, endocrine events | Hellmann et al. (2019) |
| Nivolumab | with Ipilimumab | PD-1 | metastatic or recurrent NSCLC | FDA Approved (2015) | skin rash, hypothyroidism | Kazandjian et al. (2016) |
| Pembrolizumab | With pemetrexed and a platinum-based drug | PD-1 | advanced NSCLC that lacks targetable mutations | FDA Approved (2015) | Pneumonitis, kidney injury | Kwok et al. (2016) |
| Atezolizumab | bevacizumab and chemotherapy | PD-L1 | Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC | FDA Approved (2020) | Neutropenia, hypertension | Akinboro et al. (2022) |
| Durvalumab | Chemoradiotherapy | PD-L1 | Unresectable stage III NSCLC | FDA Approved (2018) | pneumonitis | Mehra et al. (2021) |
| Amivantamab | with Platinum Chemotherapy | EGFR/MET | locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harbouring EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations | FDA Approved (2021) | Rash, paronychia | Syed et al. (2021) |
Antibodies currently approved or in development for NSCLC.
Amivantamab, a bispecific antibody to EGFR and mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET), was approved for marketing by the FDA in 2021 for the treatment of NSCLC (Syed, 2021). MET is a proto-oncogene that encodes the hepatocyte growth factor receptor c-MET (Mo and Liu, 2017). Even though MET amplification occurs only in a small proportion of NSCLC, we still found that MET gene amplification and overexpression showed correlation with reduced degradation of c-MET as well as tumorigenesis (Drilon et al., 2017). Although EGFR inhibitors have shown good clinical results, it is noteworthy that their resistance is the biggest obstacle limiting their being used, and some studies have shown that MET amplification is an important mechanism for the development of their resistance (Wang et al., 2019b). There is new evidence that the combination of MET inhibitors with EGFR inhibitors is a promising therapeutic combination for the treatment of cancer caused by EGFR mutations in early and resistant stages of NSCLC (Pasquini and Giaccone, 2018). Amivantamab inhibits proliferation of tumor cell in NSCLC patients by effectively downregulating EGFR and MET gene levels and inducing immune antitumor activity and increasing IFNγ secretion (Yun et al., 2020). Among 81 patients with NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy, the overall remission rate was 40%, with a median duration of remission of 11.1 months and a median progression-free survival of 8.3 months (Park et al., 2021). Clinical studies have shown that amivantamab has a good and durable treatment effect, even its side effects such as rash and nail fungus accompany the treatment (Table 1).
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important component of TME and plays an important role in regulating angiogenesis, and to inhibit its overexpression is an important strategy for the treatment of cancer (Frezzetti et al., 2017). VEGF belongs to the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) family, and its four types VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D can activate downstream pathways by binding to three VEGF receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3), leading to division and migration of endothelial cells, and the increase of vascular permeability (Melincovici et al., 2018). The growth of tumor cells is maintained by expressing VEGF to construct new blood vessels, which can supply more nutrients for themselves (Manzo et al., 2017), and mAbs play a therapeutic effect by blocking the binding of VEGF to receptors (Itatani et al., 2018). Currently, two mAbs against VEGF have been approved for the treatment of NSCLC, including bevacizumab against VEGF-A and ramucirumab against VEGFR-2 (Garcia et al., 2020) (Table 1). Compared with chemotherapy alone, the addition of bevacizumab prolonged overall survival by 2 months with fewer side effects, and based on this, bevacizumab was approved by the FDA for the first-line treatment of NSCLC in 2006 (Yamada et al., 2019). Ramucirumab also prolonged overall survival by 1–2 months and significantly increased response rate, and was approved for NSCLC treatment in 2014.
VEGF and EGF share a common downstream pathway, and activation of EGFR promotes the up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α), further promoting VEGF expression (Nilsson et al., 2021), a process that is a positive feedback process (Figure 1). We observed VEGF up-regulation on EGFR-mutated tumor cells (Hung et al., 2016), and more importantly, EGFR is also expressed on tumor-associated endothelial cells. Based on the above, simultaneous inhibition of EGFR and VEGF may produce more powerful anti-tumor effects. Preclinically, it has been experimentally confirmed that the use of EGFR inhibitor bevacizumab in combination in models with EGFR mutations shows better antitumor activity and later acquired resistance (Masuda et al., 2017). In clinical trials, the progression-free survival of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with bevacizumab was prolonged by 3–7 months compared with erlotinib alone (Zhou et al., 2019; Maemondo et al., 2020), while the progression-free survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with ramucirumab was prolonged by 7 months compared with erlotinib alone (Nakagawa et al., 2019). Based on the above data, the FDA has used ramucirumab in combination with erlotinib as a first-line option for the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Human epidermal growth factor 2
Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) is another proto-oncogene in the HER family. Unlike other receptors in its family, HER2 does not have a corresponding ligand to bind to it, and it exerts its activity by heterodimerizing with other EGFR receptors to promote cell growth and proliferation (Connell and Doherty, 2017). Overexpression of HER2 leads to abnormal cell growth and proliferation, which may be associated with the development of carcinogenesis, and HER2 overexpression is frequently seen in breast and gastric cancers, but less common in NSCLC patients, with an incidence of less than 5% (Takegawa and Yonesaka, 2017). However, following the use of EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC, amplification of the HER2 gene was unexpectedly found, which was importantly associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitors (Baraibar et al., 2020). To date, HER2-targeted therapy has not been approved for use in NSCLC patients. Trastuzumab deruxtecan consists of a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide base linker, and a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor that prevents cancer cells from replicating DNA, leading to cancer cell death (Indini et al., 2021) (Table 1). Trastuzumab deruxtecan was approved by the FDA in 2019 for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (Keam, 2020). After the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with metastatic HER2-mutated NSCLC who were not responding to standard therapy, 55% of patients showed proven objective efficacy with a median duration of efficacy of 9.3 months, median progression-free survival of 8.2 months, and median overall survival of 17.8 months (Li et al., 2022). Therefore, treatment targeting HER2 may be one of the solutions for EGFR inhibitor resistance.
Human epidermal growth factor 3
Human epidermal growth factor 3 (HER3) is a specific HER family member with little or no tyrosine kinase activity, and its activation depends on heterodimerization with another receptor, so it is generally not oncogenic when overexpressed alone (Haikala and Jänne, 2021). We can find abnormal HER3 expression in a variety of cancers, including breast cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, and NSCLC, which may be associated with progression or poor prognosis in these cancers (Kawakami and Yonesaka, 2016; Scharpenseel et al., 2019; Gil et al., 2021). In EGFR-targeted therapy for NSCLC, there is experimental evidence that HER3 plays a key role in cancer cell survival and drug resistance (Yonesaka et al., 2016). However, as of now, there are no internationally approved therapies targeting HER3. Patritumab deruxtecan is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a HER3 antibody attached to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker for targeted delivery of cytotoxic drugs into cancer cells (Lim et al., 2022) (Table 1). In 57 patients with NSCLC previously treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), the confirmed objective remission rate for patritumab deruxtecan was 39%; median progression-free survival was 8.2 months (Jänne et al., 2022). Since patritumab deruxtecan exhibits clinical activity to overcome EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms, we can expect that patritumab deruxtecan could be an option to overcome drug resistance in the future.
Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2
Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (Trop-2), a transmembrane glycoprotein, is involved in intracellular calcium signaling (Goldenberg et al., 2018). Trop-2 is highly overexpressed in several solid tumors, especially in NSCLC, and its downstream signaling is involved in cancer cell survival, proliferation, migration and invasion (Shvartsur and Bonavida, 2015), which can be inhibited by knockdown of Trop-2 (Sun et al., 2020). Sacituzumab govitecan consists of a Trop-2 antibody coupled to a topoisomerase I inhibitor via a hydrolyzable junction (Bardia et al., 2021), which was approved by the FDA in 2021 for the treatment of refractory triple-negative metastatic breast cancer (Fleming et al., 2021) (Table 1). Among 54 patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with 10 mg/kg sacituzumab govitecan, an objective remission rate of 19% was achieved; the median duration of response was 6 months and the clinical benefit rate was 43%, indicating that the drug has a good durable response in patients with metastatic NSCLC (Heist et al., 2017).
ADCs are a very successful form of drug delivery with both the specificity of immunotherapy and the powerful efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents, and their use can be foreseen in NSCLC. However, in the clinical phase of the drug, some adverse reactions due to the carriage of highly toxic substances have been identified. In the trastuzumab deruxtecan clinical trial, 19% of patients developed neutropenia and 26% developed associated lung disease to the point of death in two patients; patritumab deruxtecan may cause hematologic toxicity; and sacituzumab govitecan caused neutropenia in nearly 1/3 of patients (Heist et al., 2017; Jänne et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022). Therefore, it may be important to balance the relationship between antibodies and poisons, and the combination of other targets and other drugs may further improve the therapeutic effect.
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is the first costimulatory receptor and have been found to play a role in immunosuppression. As mentioned previously in this article, T cell activation requires the binding of CD28 to B7, and when CD28 binds to B7 to activate T cells, it also promotes the expression of CTLA-4, which can compete with homologous CD28 to bind B7 ligands (Hosseini et al., 2020). The affinity of CTLA-4 to B7 is stronger than that of CD28, thus the expression of CTLA-4 inhibits the activation of T cells (Rowshanravan et al., 2018). Blocking the binding of CTLA-4 to its ligand allows more B7 ligands to bind to CD28 and achieve immune enhancement. Also, since CTLA-4 is highly expressed on the surface of Tregs, blocking CTLA-4 would reduce the immunosuppressive effect of Tregs (Tekguc et al., 2021). Until now, no CTLA-4 class antibodies have been approved for first-line NSCLC treatment alone, but it can be seen in combination with other drugs in the clinic. Ipilimumab is a fully human mAb against CTLA-4 that achieves anti-tumor effects by binding to CTLA-4 and blocking its action with the B7 molecule. In a clinical study, treatment of NSCLC patients with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab had an overall survival of 17.1 months, which was better than the overall survival of 13.9 months with chemotherapy alone (Table 1), and was independent of PD-L1 expression (Hellmann et al., 2019). However, one report showed that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab caused more immune-related adverse events than nivolumab alone (Shoushtari et al., 2018).
Programmed cell death protein 1
Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is an innate immunosuppressive agent that has a small homologous sequence with CD28 and CTLA-4 and is expressed on B cells, T cells, dendritic cells, and NK cells, especially on the surface of T cells (Han et al., 2020). When T cells are activated, the second immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibits T cell activation and inflammatory factor production by binding to its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 leading to dephosphorylation of CD28, while cancer cells usually overexpress PD-L1 to escape (Ai et al., 2020). T cells that are in the TME for a long time will highly express PD-1 and show insufficient anti-tumor ability, and the immune ability of these T cells can be enhanced by blocking PD-1 (Jiang et al., 2019). PD-1 expressed on Tregs as well as tumor-associated macrophages, on the other hand, exerts an inhibitory effect on immunity and the anti-tumor effect can be improved by blocking it (Gordon et al., 2017; Overacre-Delgoffe et al., 2017). Nivolumab is the first PD-1 blocking mAb for the treatment of NSCLC, which significantly improves objective remission rate and overall survival compared with traditional chemotherapy (Borghaei et al., 2015), especially in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% in cancer cells, so nivolumab was approved by the FDA in 2015 for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC (Cortinovis et al., 2016) (Table 1). Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) is a humanized IgG4 anti-PD-1 mAb with no ADCC and CDC effects, and therefore is not cytotoxic. In a clinical study, not only did overall survival improve, but median progression-free survival was nearly 4 months longer with pembrolizumab administered in combination chemotherapy than chemotherapy alone (Gandhi et al., 2018). Pembrolizumab was approved by the FDA in 2015 as a first-line regimen for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC expressing PD-L1 (Table 1). However, after using pembrolizumab to treat lung cancer, some patients developed symptoms of colitis and pancreatitis (Ofuji et al., 2021).
Programmed death-ligand 1
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), the ligand of PD-1, belongs to the B7 protein series and is usually expressed on some macrophages and dendritic cells, and tumor cells tend to overexpress PD-L1 in order to escape from immune killing (Ohaegbulam et al., 2015). The expression of PD-L1 is regulated by interferon, and it has been experimentally demonstrated that IFN-γ leads to PD-L1 up-regulation in ovarian cancer cells (Abiko et al., 2015). It has also been shown that PD-L1 activates proliferation signals after binding to its receptor and non-immune proliferation occurs in tumor cells (Dong et al., 2018). Nearly 30% of NSCLC show high PD-L1 expression, so blocking PD-L1 can be effectively counteracted. Atezolizumab, a mAb that targets PD-L1 and activates T cells and kills tumor cells by blocking their binding to PD-1 (Crist and Balar, 2017), was approved by the FDA in 2016 for the treatment of NSCLC (Table 1). From clinical trials, atezolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC prolonged overall survival by nearly 7 months compared with chemotherapy alone, and the rate of adverse events was significantly lower than in the chemotherapy group (Herbst et al., 2020). In combination, atezolizumab used in addition to a VEGF inhibitor plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival as well as progression-free survival in patients with metastatic NSCLC (Socinski et al., 2018). Durvalumab is another PD-L1 antibody approved by the FDA for the treatment of NSCLC (Table 1). Statistically, durvalumab resulted in significantly better remission rates, median length of remission duration, and progression-free survival than the placebo group in a group of 713 NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (Antonia et al., 2017), and after 4 years the durvalumab group still had a much higher survival rate of 49.6% than the 36.3% in the placebo group (Faivre-Finn et al., 2021), with the common malignant adverse effect being pneumonia.
Cell therapy in NSCLC
Adoptive cell transfer therapy (ACT) is another general direction of immunotherapy for NSCLC, which is very personalized by directly infusing immune cells with anticancer activity into patients for treatment (Labanieh et al., 2018). One of its most important advantages is that the TME can be regulated by chemotherapy before immune cells can be infused back into the patient to provide support for the infused immune cells (Rosenberg and Restifo, 2015). Isolation of T cell populations with specific TCRs from the human body, massive expansion by T cell growth factor (IL-2) in vitro and finally reinfusion into patients to achieve cancer elimination are many ways for ACT application (Met et al., 2019). Clinical trials have shown that after using a combination of chemotherapy pretreatment, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and nivolumab, in 13 patients with advanced NSCLC, three patients experienced significant remission and 10 patients experienced symptom relief (Creelan et al., 2021). However, this process first requires resectable tumor tissue and the isolation of highly purified, specific T cells, a process that is time consuming and can lead to immune reactions due to purity (Sermer and Brentjens, 2019). With the development of genetic engineering technology, the insertion of exogenous TCR into T cells and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) has become possible, and there is also good specificity when infused back into the body, and TCR-T and CAR-T technologies have developed rapidly (Chandran and Klebanoff, 2019; Chan et al., 2021).
T cell receptor T cell therapy
The TCR in TCR-T, a dimer composed of α and β peptide chains, can specifically recognize and bind to MHC-presented intracellular and extracellular antigen fragments, thereby activating T cells to attack tumor cells (Zhao et al., 2021). However, natural TCR in the human body often have weak affinity for tumor cell antigens, and TCR-T relies on artificial coding to design high-affinity TCRs, which greatly improves the recognition affinity of T cells (Ohta et al., 2019). Data have shown that the affinity of amino acid-modified TCR for tumor cell common antigen TAA is significantly increased, and 80% of myeloma patients have good clinical inhibition performance (Rapoport et al., 2015). New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) is a cancer-testis antigen that is barely expressed in humans except in the testis, but is overexpressed in solid tumors (Thomas et al., 2018), and its overexpression may also cause spontaneous humoral and cellular immunity, making it a desirable therapeutic target (Table 2). Besides, NY-ESO-1 is also a good biomarker for anti-PD-1 treatment of NSCLC (Ohue et al., 2019). In a clinical study, NY-ESO-1 specific TCR engineered-T cells showed benefit in metastatic NSCLC (Xia et al., 2018).
TABLE 2
| Type | Antigen | Study population | Stage | Toxicity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCR-T | NY-ESO-1 | metastatic NSCLC | Clinical Phase I (NCT02457650) | Transient anemia, White blood cell decrease | Xia et al. (2018) |
| CAR-T | EGFR | advanced relapsed/refractory EGFR-positive NSCLC | Clinical Phase I(NCT03182816) | Gastrointestinal perforation, pulmonary hemorrhage | Zhang et al. (2021) |
| CAR-T | LunX | NSCLC | preclinical | Hu et al. (2020) | |
| CAR-T | PD-L1 | NSCLC | Clinical Phase I (NCT03330834) | pulmonary | Liu et al. (2020) |
| CAR-T | Mesothelin | NSCLC | preclinical | Ye et al. (2019) |
Clinical trials of cell therapy for NSCLC.
Chimeric antigen receptor T cells
CAR-T are genetically engineered synthetic cells in which CARs can specifically recognize cancer cell surface antigens, and CARs consist of four components: extracellular antigen recognition domain, extracellular spacer domain, transmembrane domain, and intracellular T cell activation domain (Sterner and Sterner, 2021), and CAR-T cells can specifically recognize cancer cell surface antigens through single-chain variable fragment (scFv). T cells are activated by the signaling module CD3ζ and co-stimulatory molecules (CD28, 4-1BB) (Sadelain et al., 2017) (Figure 1). Dual-signal activation is the classical pathway of T-cell activation, in which the first generation of CAR-T cells rely only on CD3ζ to activate T cells, but T cells undergo rapid apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2017), the effect is not ideal; the second generation of CAR-T cells add co-stimulatory molecules CD28 or CD137, dual-signal activation amplifies the stimulation signal and promotes T cell proliferation (Lee et al., 2015); the third generation of CAR-T cells even contain two co-stimulatory molecules, further enhancing the ability to kill tumor cells; fourth-generation CAR-T cells increase the expression of cytokines, such as IL-2, which promotes T-cell growth and enhances T-cell activity. The fifth generation of CAR-T cells, perhaps due to their toxicity considerations, abandoned the design of dual co-stimulatory molecules that started in the third generation and added only the IL-2 receptor beta fragment to the second generation of CAR-T cells. Notably, Jonathan T Sockolosky et al. modified the amino acid site of murine-derived IL-2/IL-2Rβ and redesigned IL-2 to stimulate only T cells expressing orthologous IL-2Rβ, while wild-type IL-2 was unable to stimulate IL-2Rβ on T cells, avoiding systemic toxicity due to indiscriminate and unrestricted activation (Sockolosky et al., 2018).
Unlike TILs and TCRs, which specifically recognize MHC-presented antigens, CARs do not depend on MHC expression, and even if MHC expression is down-regulated in tumor cells, CARs still efficiently recognize antigens and kill tumor cells (Cohen, 2018), which may be the greatest advantage of CAR-T over other modalities. Of great significance, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of hematological B-cell malignancies due to favorable clinical trials (Patel et al., 2020). In the study of CAR-T in solid tumors, a large part of it has focused on NSCLC (Kiesgen et al., 2018). Common targeted antigens of NSCLC include HER2, EGFR, PD-L1, Mesothelin, etc (Liu et al., 2020a; Qu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021) (Table 2). Data support that after the use of EGFR-targeted CAR-T cells in 11 NSCLC patients, seven patients achieved response without malignant reaction (Feng et al., 2016). However, due to the high sensitivity of CAR-T cells, these antigens are also expressed in normal tissues in addition to tumor cells, which may lead to some side effects (Morello et al., 2016). Recently, lung-specific X (LunX)-CAR-T has been used to successfully eradicate NSCLC cells with high expression of LunX, and showed better infiltration (Hu et al., 2020). Unlike conventional targeted antigens, LunX is often highly expressed only in the lung and nose, but hardly in other parts of the human body, and cell therapy using LunX-CAR-T may be a new means of treating NSCLC. However, there are a number of factors that limit the development of CAR-T, starting with its extremely high cost of construction and labor, with the total cost of a complete treatment potentially reaching nearly a million dollars (Lin et al., 2018). During the course of treatment, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity have been identified, which must be given sufficient attention in future clinical studies (Brudno and Kochenderfer, 2019).
Conclusion and perspectives
With the increasing understanding of physiological immunity in modern medicine, first-line clinical treatment options and preclinical studies for NSCLC have changed significantly from traditional surgical resection as well as systemic chemotherapy to targeted and personalized immunotherapy, highlighting the importance of immunotherapy for the improvement of solid tumors. We were surprised to see that these regimens were effective in improving overall survival and progression-free survival in NSCLC patients, and the FDA approved these drugs for marketing and as first-line treatment for NSCLC, but unfortunately these effects were not demonstrated in some patients, and accompanied by adverse effects and drug resistance. It is worthwhile to think about immunotherapy, and in order to further improve the efficacy, we need to have a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved. We have detailed antibody therapy and cell therapy in immunotherapy, which includes first-line regimens and promising drugs still in clinical trials, but in the face of heterogeneous NSCLC, some patients are not suitable to use PD-L1 and EGFR expression profiles as a basis for clinical dosing regimen selection. Biomarkers play a key role in the selection of drug regimens, and the importance of accurately classifying therapies and developing additional biomarkers is now urgently needed.
EGFR mutations play a very important role in NSCLC, which are mainly exon 19 deletion mutations, exon 21 point-mutations, exon 20 mutations and exon 20 insertion mutations, etc (Harrison et al., 2020). Unfortunately, there are no corresponding antibodies for treatment except amivantamab, while small molecule EGFR TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) has good clinical performance. Six EGFR TKI have been approved by the FDA: Gefitinib (Rawluk and Waller, 2018), Erlotinib (Abdelgalil et al., 2020), Afatinib (Harvey et al., 2020), Dacomitinib (Shirley, 2018), Osimertinib (Remon et al., 2018), and Mobocertinib (Markham, 2021). Further breakthroughs in the use of antibodies against EGFR mutations can be expected as research progresses.
In addition, Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) is one of the most commonly mutated oncogenes, and its mutation is another very important cause of cancer in NSCLC, which accounts for a quarter of all oncogenic mutations (Liu et al., 2019b). Previous decades of research and treatment for KRAS have ended in failure, including, of course, antibody therapy and cellular therapy (Drosten and Barbacid, 2020). 2021 FDA approval of Sotorasib for metastatic NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations suggests that more promising immunotherapy options are about to emerge (Reck et al., 2021).
In terms of regimen selection, in addition to the traditional combination with chemotherapeutic agents, we have found that some targets and pathways work better in combination, including EGFR with VEGF, PD-1 and CTLA-4, even though some of them have not been approved by the FDA for individual dosing. We can see them in some co-formulation as well as bispecific targets, but with improved efficacy, we should also be alert to their incremental toxicities.
In conclusion, although immunotherapy for NSCLC has made some achievements, more potential options are worth exploring at the same time. As theories and technologies become more sophisticated, better treatment options are being anticipated.
Statements
Author contributions
TY conceived and wrote the first draft. YX and YZ collected the data. YW and JZ collated the data. JL participated in the language polishing. SX participated in the format revision. L-SL participated in the revision of the manuscript and refined the final version. All authors approved the final version.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1812403, 82260780).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbdelgalilA. A.Al-KahtaniH. M.Al-JenoobiF. I. (2020). Erlotinib.Profiles Drug Subst. Excip. Relat. Methodol.45, 93–117. 10.1016/bs.podrm.2019.10.004
2
AbikoK.MatsumuraN.HamanishiJ.HorikawaN.MurakamiR.YamaguchiK.et al (2015). IFN-γ from lymphocytes induces PD-L1 expression and promotes progression of ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer112 (9), 1501–1509. 10.1038/bjc.2015.101
3
AiL.XuA.XuJ. (2020). Roles of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: Signaling, cancer, and beyond. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.1248, 33–59. 10.1007/978-981-15-3266-5_3
4
AkinboroO.LarkinsE.Pai-ScherfL. H.MathieuL. N.RenY.ChengJ.et al (2022). FDA approval summary: Pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and cemiplimab-rwlc as single agents for first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic PD-L1-high NSCLC. Clin. Cancer Res.28 (11), 2221–2228. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3844
5
AllemaniC.MatsudaT.Di CarloV.HarewoodR.MatzM.NikšićM.et al (2018). Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): Analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet London, Engl.391 (10125), 1023–1075. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3
6
AntoniaS. J.VillegasA.DanielD.VicenteD.MurakamiS.HuiR.et al (2017). Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.377 (20), 1919–1929. 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937
7
BaraibarI.MezquitaL.Gil-BazoI.PlanchardD. (2020). Novel drugs targeting EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations in metastatic NSCLC, Critical reviews in oncology. hematology148, 102906. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102906
8
BardiaA.HurvitzS. A.TolaneyS. M.LoiratD.PunieK.OliveiraM.et al (2021). Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.384 (16), 1529–1541. 10.1056/NEJMoa2028485
9
BinnewiesM.RobertsE. W.KerstenK.ChanV.FearonD. F.MeradM.et al (2018). Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat. Med.24 (5), 541–550. 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x
10
BorghaeiH.Paz-AresL.HornL.SpigelD. R.SteinsM.ReadyN. E.et al (2015). Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.373 (17), 1627–1639. 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
11
BrudnoJ. N.KochenderferJ. N. (2019). Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: Mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev.34, 45–55. 10.1016/j.blre.2018.11.002
12
BruecklW. M.FickerJ. H.ZeitlerG. (2020). Clinically relevant prognostic and predictive markers for immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BMC cancer20 (1), 1185. 10.1186/s12885-020-07690-8
13
ChanJ. D.LaiJ.SlaneyC. Y.KalliesA.BeavisP. A.DarcyP. K. (2021). Cellular networks controlling T cell persistence in adoptive cell therapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol.21 (12), 769–784. 10.1038/s41577-021-00539-6
14
ChandranS. S.KlebanoffC. A. (2019). T cell receptor-based cancer immunotherapy: Emerging efficacy and pathways of resistance. Immunol. Rev.290 (1), 127–147. 10.1111/imr.12772
15
ChangJ. Y.MehranR. J.FengL.VermaV.LiaoZ.WelshJ. W.et al (2021). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (revised STARS): Long-term results of a single-arm, prospective trial with prespecified comparison to surgery. Lancet Oncol.22 (10), 1448–1457. 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00401-0
16
ChauC. H.SteegP. S.FiggW. D. (2019). Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer. Lancet (London, Engl.394 (10200), 793–804. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31774-X
17
ChenD. S.MellmanI. (2013). Oncology meets immunology: The cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity39 (1), 1–10. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012
18
ChenD. S.MellmanI. (2017). Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature541 (7637), 321–330. 10.1038/nature21349
19
ChenW.YuanY.JiangX. (2020). Antibody and antibody fragments for cancer immunotherapy. J. Control. Release328, 395–406. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.021
20
CohenA. D. (2018). CAR T cells and other cellular therapies for multiple myeloma: 2018 update.Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book.38, e6–e15. 10.1200/EDBK_200889
21
ConnellC. M.DohertyG. J. (2017). Activating HER2 mutations as emerging targets in multiple solid cancers. ESMO open2 (5), e000279. 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000279
22
CortinovisD. L.CanovaS.AbbateM.ColoneseF.BidoliP. (2016). Focus on nivolumab in NSCLC. Front. Med.3, 67. 10.3389/fmed.2016.00067
23
CreelanB. C.WangC.TeerJ. K.TolozaE. M.YaoJ.KimS.et al (2021). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte treatment for anti-PD-1-resistant metastatic lung cancer: A phase 1 trial. Nat. Med.27 (8), 1410–1418. 10.1038/s41591-021-01462-y
24
CristM.BalarA. (2017). Atezolizumab in invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol.10 (12), 1295–1301. 10.1080/17512433.2017.1389275
25
CukerA.BurnettA.TrillerD.CrowtherM.AnsellJ.Van CottE. M.et al (2019). Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: Guidance from the anticoagulation forum. Am. J. Hematol.94 (6), 697–709. 10.1002/ajh.25475
26
DesaiA.AbdayemP.AdjeiA. A.PlanchardD. (2022). Antibody-drug conjugates: A promising novel therapeutic approach in lung cancer. Lung cancer Amsterdam, Neth.163, 96–106. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.12.002
27
Díaz-SerranoA.Sánchez-TorreA.Paz-AresL. (2019). Necitumumab for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol.15 (7), 705–716. 10.2217/fon-2018-0594
28
DohopolskiM.GottumukkalaS.GomezD.IyengarP. (2021). Radiation therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.11 (10), a037713. 10.1101/cshperspect.a037713
29
DongP.XiongY.YueJ.HanleyS. J. B.WatariH. (2018). Tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signaling in cancer initiation, development and treatment: Beyond immune evasion. Front. Oncol.8, 386. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00386
30
DrilonA.CappuzzoF.OuS. I.CamidgeD. R. (2017). Targeting MET in lung cancer: Will expectations finally Be MET?J. Thorac. Oncol.12 (1), 15–26. 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.014
31
DrostenM.BarbacidM. (2020). Targeting the MAPK pathway in KRAS-driven tumors. Cancer Cell37 (4), 543–550. 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.013
32
DumaN.Santana-DavilaR.MolinaJ. R. (2019). Non-small cell lung cancer: Epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc.94 (8), 1623–1640. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.013
33
Faivre-FinnC.VicenteD.KurataT.PlanchardD.Paz-AresL.VansteenkisteJ. F.et al (2021). Four-year survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC-an update from the PACIFIC trial. J. Thorac. Oncol.16 (5), 860–867. 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.12.015
34
FengK.GuoY.DaiH.WangY.LiX.JiaH.et al (2016). Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for the immunotherapy of patients with EGFR-expressing advanced relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer.Sci. China. Life Sci.59 (5), 468–479. 10.1007/s11427-016-5023-8
35
FerraraN.AdamisA. P. (2016). Ten years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.15 (6), 385–403. 10.1038/nrd.2015.17
36
FlemingP. J.Jr.KarpioS.LombardoN. (2021). Sacituzumab govitecan for treatment of refractory triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. J. Adv. Pract. Oncol.12 (7), 747–752. 10.6004/jadpro.2021.12.7.8
37
FrankelT.LanfrancaM. P.ZouW. (2017). The role of tumor microenvironment in cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.1036, 51–64. 10.1007/978-3-319-67577-0_4
38
FrezzettiD.GalloM.MaielloM. R.D'AlessioA.EspositoC.ChicchinelliN.et al (2017). VEGF as a potential target in lung cancer. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets21 (10), 959–966. 10.1080/14728222.2017.1371137
39
GandhiL.Rodríguez-AbreuD.GadgeelS.EstebanE.FelipE.De AngelisF.et al (2018). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.378 (22), 2078–2092. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005
40
GarciaJ.HurwitzH. I.SandlerA. B.MilesD.ColemanR. L.DeurlooR.et al (2020). Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in cancer treatment: A review of 15 years of clinical experience and future outlook. Cancer Treat. Rev.86, 102017. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102017
41
GaronE. B.CiuleanuT. E.ArrietaO.PrabhashK.SyrigosK. N.GokselT.et al (2014). Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): A multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, Engl.384 (9944), 665–673. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60845-X
42
GenovaC.HirschF. R. (2016). Clinical potential of necitumumab in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Onco. Targets. Ther.9, 5427–5437. 10.2147/OTT.S114039
43
GilV.MirandaS.RiisnaesR.GurelB.D'AmbrosioM.VasciaveoA.et al (2021). HER3 is an actionable target in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res.81 (24), 6207–6218. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-3360
44
GoldenbergD. M.SteinR.SharkeyR. M. (2018). The emergence of trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) as a novel cancer target. Oncotarget9 (48), 28989–29006. 10.18632/oncotarget.25615
45
GordonS. R.MauteR. L.DulkenB. W.HutterG.GeorgeB. M.McCrackenM. N.et al (2017). PD-1 expression by tumour-associated macrophages inhibits phagocytosis and tumour immunity. Nature545 (7655), 495–499. 10.1038/nature22396
46
GouletD. R.AtkinsW. M. (2020). Considerations for the design of antibody-based therapeutics. J. Pharm. Sci.109 (1), 74–103. 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.05.031
47
HafeezU.ParakhS.GanH. K.ScottA. M. (2020). Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy. Mol. (Basel,) Switz.25 (20), E4764. 10.3390/molecules25204764
48
HaikalaH. M.JänneP. A. (2021). Thirty years of HER3: From basic biology to therapeutic interventions. Clin. Cancer Res.27 (13), 3528–3539. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4465
49
HanY.LiuD.LiL. (2020). PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: Current researches in cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res.10 (3), 727–742.
50
HarrisonP. T.VyseS.HuangP. H. (2020). Rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol.61, 167–179. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.09.015
51
HarveyR. D.AdamsV. R.BeardsleeT.MedinaP. (2020). Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract.26 (6), 1461–1474. 10.1177/1078155220931926
52
HeistR. S.GuarinoM. J.MastersG.PurcellW. T.StarodubA. N.HornL.et al (2017). Therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with an SN-38-Anti-Trop-2 drug conjugate, sacituzumab govitecan. J. Clin. Oncol.35 (24), 2790–2797. 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1894
53
HellmannM. D.Paz-AresL.Bernabe CaroR.ZurawskiB.KimS. W.Carcereny CostaE.et al (2019). Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.381 (21), 2020–2031. 10.1056/NEJMoa1910231
54
HerbstR. S.GiacconeG.de MarinisF.ReinmuthN.VergnenegreA.BarriosC. H.et al (2020). Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med.383 (14), 1328–1339. 10.1056/NEJMoa1917346
55
HosseiniA.GharibiT.MarofiF.BabalooZ.BaradaranB. (2020). CTLA-4: From mechanism to autoimmune therapy. Int. Immunopharmacol.80, 106221. 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106221
56
HuZ.ZhengX.JiaoD.ZhouY.SunR.WangB.et al (2020). LunX-CAR T cells as a targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics17, 361–370. 10.1016/j.omto.2020.04.008
57
HungM. S.ChenI. C.LinP. Y.LungJ. H.LiY. C.LinY. C.et al (2016). Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation enhances expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in lung cancer. Oncol. Lett.12 (6), 4598–4604. 10.3892/ol.2016.5287
58
IndiniA.RijavecE.GrossiF. (2021). Trastuzumab deruxtecan: Changing the destiny of HER2 expressing solid tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (9), 4774. 10.3390/ijms22094774
59
ItataniY.KawadaK.YamamotoT.SakaiY. (2018). Resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in cancer-alterations to anti-VEGF pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19 (4), E1232. 10.3390/ijms19041232
60
JänneP. A.BaikC.SuW. C.JohnsonM. L.HayashiH.NishioM.et al (2022). Efficacy and safety of patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in EGFR inhibitor-resistant, EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov.12 (1), 74–89. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0715
61
JiangX.WangJ.DengX.XiongF.GeJ.XiangB.et al (2019). Role of the tumor microenvironment in PD-L1/PD-1-mediated tumor immune escape. Mol. Cancer18 (1), 10. 10.1186/s12943-018-0928-4
62
JolivetL.Ait Mohamed AmarI.HoriotC.BoursinF.ColasC.LetastS.et al (2022). Intra-domain cysteines (IDC), a new strategy for the development of original antibody fragment-drug conjugates (FDCs). Pharmaceutics14 (8), 1524. 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081524
63
KantarjianH.SteinA.GökbugetN.FieldingA. K.SchuhA. C.RiberaJ. M.et al (2017). Blinatumomab versus chemotherapy for advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med.376 (9), 836–847. 10.1056/NEJMoa1609783
64
KawakamiH.YonesakaK. (2016). HER3 and its ligand, heregulin, as targets for cancer therapy. Recent Pat. anticancer. Drug Discov.11 (3), 267–274. 10.2174/1574892811666160418123221
65
KazandjianD.SuzmanD. L.BlumenthalG.MushtiS.HeK.LibegM.et al (2016). FDA approval summary: Nivolumab for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Oncologist21 (5), 634–642. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0507
66
KeamS. J. (2020). Trastuzumab deruxtecan: First approval. Drugs80 (5), 501–508. 10.1007/s40265-020-01281-4
67
KholodenkoR. V.KalinovskyD. V.DoroninIIPonomarevE. D.KholodenkoI. V. (2019). Antibody fragments as potential biopharmaceuticals for cancer therapy: Success and limitations. Curr. Med. Chem.26 (3), 396–426. 10.2174/0929867324666170817152554
68
KiesgenS.ChicaybamL.ChintalaN. K.AdusumilliP. S. (2018). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for thoracic malignancies. J. Thorac. Oncol.13 (1), 16–26. 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.001
69
KwokG.YauT. C.ChiuJ. W.TseE.KwongY. L. (2016). Pembrolizumab (keytruda).Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.12 (11), 2777–2789. 10.1080/21645515.2016.1199310
70
LabaniehL.MajznerR. G.MackallC. L. (2018). Programming CAR-T cells to kill cancer. Nat. Biomed. Eng.2 (6), 377–391. 10.1038/s41551-018-0235-9
71
LabrijnA. F.JanmaatM. L.ReichertJ. M.ParrenP. (2019). Bispecific antibodies: A mechanistic review of the pipeline. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.18 (8), 585–608. 10.1038/s41573-019-0028-1
72
LeeD. W.KochenderferJ. N.Stetler-StevensonM.CuiY. K.DelbrookC.FeldmanS. A.et al (2015). T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: A phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet (London, Engl.385 (9967), 517–528. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61403-3
73
LeeW. S.YangH.ChonH. J.KimC. (2020). Combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade normalizes vascular-immune crosstalk to potentiate cancer immunity. Exp. Mol. Med.52 (9), 1475–1485. 10.1038/s12276-020-00500-y
74
LiB.ChanH. L.ChenP. (2019). Immune checkpoint inhibitors: Basics and challenges. Curr. Med. Chem.26 (17), 3009–3025. 10.2174/0929867324666170804143706
75
LiB. T.SmitE. F.GotoY.NakagawaK.UdagawaH.MazièresJ.et al (2022). Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.386 (3), 241–251. 10.1056/NEJMoa2112431
76
LimS. M.KimC. G.ChoB. C. (2022). Antibody-drug conjugates: A new addition to the treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res.82 (1), 18–20. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-3481
77
LinJ. K.LermanB. J.BarnesJ. I.BoursiquotB. C.TanY. J.RobinsonA. Q. L.et al (2018). Cost effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol.36 (32), 3192–3202. 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.0642
78
LiuX.WangP.ZhangC.MaZ. (2017). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR): A rising star in the era of precision medicine of lung cancer. Oncotarget8 (30), 50209–50220. 10.18632/oncotarget.16854
79
LiuW.ZhaoW.BaiX.JinS.LiY.QiuC.et al (2019). High antitumor activity of Sortase A-generated anti-CD20 antibody fragment drug conjugates. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.134, 81–92. 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.04.015
80
LiuP.WangY.LiX. (2019). Targeting the untargetable KRAS in cancer therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B9 (5), 871–879. 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.03.002
81
LiuM.WangX.LiW.YuX.Flores-VillanuevaP.Xu-MonetteZ. Y.et al (2020). Targeting PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer using CAR T cells. Oncogenesis9 (8), 72. 10.1038/s41389-020-00257-z
82
LiuH.MaY.YangC.XiaS.PanQ.ZhaoH.et al (2020). Severe delayed pulmonary toxicity following PD-L1-specific CAR-T cell therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Transl. Immunol.9 (10), e1154. 10.1002/cti2.1154
83
LoughlinK. R.ColeyW. B. (2020). William B. Coley: His hypothesis, his toxin, and the birth of immunotherapy.Urol. Clin. North Am.47 (4), 413–417. 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.07.001
84
LuS.ShihJ. Y.JangT. W.LiamC. K.YuY. (2021). Afatinib as first-line treatment in asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: A narrative review of real-world evidence. Adv. Ther.38 (5), 2038–2053. 10.1007/s12325-021-01696-9
85
MaemondoM.FukuharaT.SaitoH.FuruyaN.KobayashiK.SugawaraS.et al (2020). NEJ026: Final overall survival analysis of bevacizumab plus erlotinib treatment for NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR-mutations. J. Clin. Oncol.38, 9506. 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.9506
86
ManzoA.MontaninoA.CarillioG.CostanzoR.SandomenicoC.NormannoN.et al (2017). Angiogenesis inhibitors in NSCLC. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18 (10), E2021. 10.3390/ijms18102021
87
MarkhamA. (2021). Mobocertinib: First approval. Drugs81 (17), 2069–2074. 10.1007/s40265-021-01632-9
88
MasudaC.YanagisawaM.YorozuK.KurasawaM.FurugakiK.IshikuraN.et al (2017). Bevacizumab counteracts VEGF-dependent resistance to erlotinib in an EGFR-mutated NSCLC xenograft model. Int. J. Oncol.51 (2), 425–434. 10.3892/ijo.2017.4036
89
MehraR.YongC.SealB.van KeepM.RaadA.ZhangY. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC: A us healthcare perspective. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw.19 (2), 153–162. 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7621
90
MelincoviciC. S.BoşcaA. B.ŞuşmanS.MărgineanM.MihuC.IstrateM.et al (2018). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - key factor in normal and pathological angiogenesis. Romanian J. Morphol. embryology = Revue roumaine de Morphol. embryologie59 (2), 455–467.
91
MetÖ.JensenK. M.ChamberlainC. A.DoniaM.SvaneI. M. (2019). Principles of adoptive T cell therapy in cancer. Semin. Immunopathol.41 (1), 49–58. 10.1007/s00281-018-0703-z
92
MoH. N.LiuP. (2017). Targeting MET in cancer therapy. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med.3 (3), 148–153. 10.1016/j.cdtm.2017.06.002
93
MorelloA.SadelainM.AdusumilliP. S. (2016). Mesothelin-targeted CARs: Driving T cells to solid tumors. Cancer Discov.6 (2), 133–146. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0583
94
NakagawaK.GaronE. B.SetoT.NishioM.Ponce AixS.Paz-AresL.et al (2019). Ramucirumab plus erlotinib in patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (RELAY): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.Lancet. Oncol.20 (12), 1655–1669. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30634-5
95
NilssonM. B.RobichauxJ.HerynkM. H.CasconeT.LeX.ElaminY.et al (2021). Altered regulation of HIF-1α in naive- and drug-resistant EGFR-mutant NSCLC: Implications for a vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent phenotype. J. Thorac. Oncol.16 (3), 439–451. 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.11.022
96
OfujiK.HiramatsuK.NosakaT.NaitoT.TakahashiK.MatsudaH.et al (2021). Pembrolizumab-induced autoimmune side effects of colon and pancreas in a patient with lung cancer. Clin. J. Gastroenterol.14 (6), 1692–1699. 10.1007/s12328-021-01499-z
97
OhaegbulamK. C.AssalA.Lazar-MolnarE.YaoY.ZangX. (2015). Human cancer immunotherapy with antibodies to the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway. Trends Mol. Med.21 (1), 24–33. 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.10.009
98
OhtaR.Demachi-OkamuraA.AkatsukaY.FujiwaraH.KuzushimaK. (2019). Improving TCR affinity on 293T cells. J. Immunol. Methods466, 1–8. 10.1016/j.jim.2018.11.010
99
OhueY.KuroseK.KarasakiT.IsobeM.YamaokaT.FutamiJ.et al (2019). Serum antibody against NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 antigens potentially predicts clinical responses to anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy in NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol.14 (12), 2071–2083. 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.008
100
Overacre-DelgoffeA. E.ChikinaM.DadeyR. E.YanoH.BrunazziE. A.ShayanG.et al (2017). Interferon-γ drives T(reg) fragility to promote anti-tumor immunity. Cell169 (6), 1130–1141. e11. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.005
101
ParkK.HauraE. B.LeighlN. B.MitchellP.ShuC. A.GirardN.et al (2021). Amivantamab in EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer progressing on platinum chemotherapy: Initial results from the CHRYSALIS phase I study. J. Clin. Oncol.39 (30), 3391–3402. 10.1200/JCO.21.00662
102
ParrayH. A.ShuklaS.SamalS.ShrivastavaT.AhmedS.SharmaC.et al (2020). Hybridoma technology a versatile method for isolation of monoclonal antibodies, its applicability across species, limitations, advancement and future perspectives. Int. Immunopharmacol.85, 106639. 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106639
103
PasquiniG.GiacconeG. (2018). C-MET inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs27 (4), 363–375. 10.1080/13543784.2018.1462336
104
PatelA. J.RichterA.DraysonM. T.MiddletonG. W. (2020). The role of B lymphocytes in the immuno-biology of non-small-cell lung cancer.Cancer Immunol. Immunother.69 (3), 325–342. 10.1007/s00262-019-02461-2
105
PengS.WangR.ZhangX.MaY.ZhongL.LiK.et al (2019). EGFR-TKI resistance promotes immune escape in lung cancer via increased PD-L1 expression. Mol. Cancer18 (1), 165. 10.1186/s12943-019-1073-4
106
PioR.AjonaD.Ortiz-EspinosaS.MantovaniA.LambrisJ. D. (2019). Complementing the cancer-immunity cycle. Front. Immunol.10, 774. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00774
107
QuJ.MeiQ.ChenL.ZhouJ. (2021). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Current status and future perspectives. Cancer Immunol. Immunother.70 (3), 619–631. 10.1007/s00262-020-02735-0
108
RapoportA. P.StadtmauerE. A.Binder-SchollG. K.GoloubevaO.VoglD. T.LaceyS. F.et al (2015). NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma. Nat. Med.21 (8), 914–921. 10.1038/nm.3910
109
RawlukJ.WallerC. F. (2018). Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les Rech. cancer211, 235–246.
110
ReckM.CarboneD. P.GarassinoM.BarlesiF. (2021). Targeting KRAS in non-small-cell lung cancer: Recent progress and new approaches. Ann. Oncol.32 (9), 1101–1110. 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.001
111
RegisterA. C.TarighatS. S.LeeH. Y. (2021). Bioassay development for bispecific antibodies-challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (10), 5350. 10.3390/ijms22105350
112
RemonJ.SteuerC. E.RamalingamS. S.FelipE. (2018). Osimertinib and other third-generation EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Ann. Oncol.29 (1), i20–i27. 10.1093/annonc/mdx704
113
RosenbergS. A.RestifoN. P. (2015). Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Sci. (New York, N.Y.)348 (6230), 62–68. 10.1126/science.aaa4967
114
RowshanravanB.HallidayN.SansomD. M. (2018). CTLA-4: A moving target in immunotherapy. Blood131 (1), 58–67. 10.1182/blood-2017-06-741033
115
RussoA. E.PrioloD.AntonelliG.LibraM.McCubreyJ. A.FerraùF. (2017). Bevacizumab in the treatment of NSCLC: Patient selection and perspectives.Lung Cancer8, 259–269. 10.2147/LCTT.S110306
116
SadelainM.RivièreI.RiddellS. (2017). Therapeutic T cell engineering. Nature545 (7655), 423–431. 10.1038/nature22395
117
SajiH.OkadaM.TsuboiM.NakajimaR.SuzukiK.AokageK.et al (2022). Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): A multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, Engl.399 (10335), 1607–1617. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02333-3
118
ScharpenseelH.HanssenA.LogesS.MohmeM.BernreutherC.PeineS.et al (2019). EGFR and HER3 expression in circulating tumor cells and tumor tissue from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 7406. 10.1038/s41598-019-43678-6
119
SermerD.BrentjensR. (2019). CAR T-cell therapy: Full speed ahead. Hematol. Oncol.37 (1), 95–100. 10.1002/hon.2591
120
ShirleyM. (2018). Dacomitinib: First global approval. Drugs78 (18), 1947–1953. 10.1007/s40265-018-1028-x
121
ShoushtariA. N.FriedmanC. F.Navid-AzarbaijaniP.PostowM. A.CallahanM. K.MomtazP.et al (2018). Measuring toxic effects and time to treatment failure for nivolumab plus ipilimumab in melanoma. JAMA Oncol.4 (1), 98–101. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2391
122
ShvartsurA.BonavidaB. (2015). Trop2 and its overexpression in cancers: Regulation and clinical/therapeutic implications. Genes Cancer6 (3-4), 84–105. 10.18632/genesandcancer.40
123
SiegelR. L.MillerK. D.JemalA. (2020). Cancer statistics, 2020. CA a cancer J. Clin.70, 7–30. 10.3322/caac.21590
124
SigismundS.AvanzatoD.LanzettiL. (2018). Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer. Mol. Oncol.12 (1), 3–20. 10.1002/1878-0261.12155
125
SocinskiM. A.JotteR. M.CappuzzoF.OrlandiF.StroyakovskiyD.NogamiN.et al (2018). Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med.378 (24), 2288–2301. 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948
126
SockoloskyJ. T.TrottaE.ParisiG.PictonL.SuL. L.LeA. C.et al (2018). Selective targeting of engineered T cells using orthogonal IL-2 cytokine-receptor complexes. Sci. (New York, N.Y.)359 (6379), 1037–1042. 10.1126/science.aar3246
127
StankovicB.BjørhovdeH. A. K.SkarshaugR.AamodtH.FrafjordA.MüllerE.et al (2018). Immune cell composition in human non-small cell lung cancer. Front. Immunol.9, 3101. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03101
128
SternerR. C.SternerR. M. (2021). CAR-T cell therapy: Current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J.11 (4), 69. 10.1038/s41408-021-00459-7
129
SunX.XingG.ZhangC.LuK.WangY.HeX. (2020). Knockdown of Trop2 inhibits proliferation and migration and induces apoptosis of endometrial cancer cells via AKT/β-catenin pathway. Cell biochem. Funct.38 (2), 141–148. 10.1002/cbf.3450
130
SungH.FerlayJ.SiegelR. L.LaversanneM.SoerjomataramI.JemalA.et al (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca. A Cancer J. Clin.71, 209–249. 10.3322/caac.21660
131
SyedY. Y. (2021). Amivantamab: First approval. Drugs81 (11), 1349–1353. 10.1007/s40265-021-01561-7
132
TakegawaN.YonesakaK. (2017). HER2 as an emerging oncotarget for colorectal cancer treatment after failure of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Clin. Colorectal Cancer16 (4), 247–251. 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.001
133
TandbergD. J.TongB. C.AckersonB. G.KelseyC. R. (2018). Surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review. Cancer124 (4), 667–678. 10.1002/cncr.31196
134
TekgucM.WingJ. B.OsakiM.LongJ.SakaguchiS. (2021). Treg-expressed CTLA-4 depletes CD80/CD86 by trogocytosis, releasing free PD-L1 on antigen-presenting cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118 (30), e2023739118. 10.1073/pnas.2023739118
135
ThakurM. K.WozniakA. J. (2017). Spotlight on necitumumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma.Lung Cancer8, 13–19. 10.2147/LCTT.S104207
136
ThatcherN.HirschF. R.LuftA. V.SzczesnaA.CiuleanuT. E.DediuM.et al (2015). Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin alone as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SQUIRE): An open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.Lancet. Oncol.16 (7), 763–774. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00021-2
137
ThomasR.Al-KhadairiG.RoelandsJ.HendrickxW.DermimeS.BedognettiD.et al (2018). NY-ESO-1 based immunotherapy of cancer: Current perspectives. Front. Immunol.9, 947. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00947
138
VansteenkisteJ.WautersE.ReymenB.AckermannC. J.PetersS.De RuysscherD. (2019). Current status of immune checkpoint inhibition in early-stage NSCLC. Ann. Oncol.30 (8), 1244–1253. 10.1093/annonc/mdz175
139
VinodS. K.HauE. (2020). Radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer: Current status and future directions. Respirol. Carlt. Vic.25 (2), 61–71. 10.1111/resp.13870
140
WaldmannH. (2019). Human monoclonal antibodies: The benefits of humanization.Methods Mol. Biol.1904, 1–10. 10.1007/978-1-4939-8958-4_1
141
WalkerC.MojaresE.Del Río HernándezA. (2018). Role of extracellular matrix in development and cancer progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19 (10), E3028. 10.3390/ijms19103028
142
WangQ.ChenY.ParkJ.LiuX.HuY.WangT.et al (2019). Design and production of bispecific antibodies. Antibodies (Basel,) Switz.8 (3), E43. 10.3390/antib8030043
143
WangQ.YangS.WangK.SunS. Y. (2019). MET inhibitors for targeted therapy of EGFR TKI-resistant lung cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol.12 (1), 63. 10.1186/s13045-019-0759-9
144
WangH.YungM. M. H.NganH. Y. S.ChanK. K. L.ChanD. W. (2021). The impact of the tumor microenvironment on macrophage polarization in cancer metastatic progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (12), 6560. 10.3390/ijms22126560
145
WeiS. C.DuffyC. R.AllisonJ. P. (2018). Fundamental mechanisms of immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov.8 (9), 1069–1086. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0367
146
WilsonB. Z.BahadirA.AndrewsM.KarpenJ.WinklerG.SmelskiG.et al (2022). Initial experience with F(ab')2 antivenom compared with Fab antivenom for rattlesnake envenomations reported to a single poison center during 2019. Toxicon X.209, 10–17. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2022.01.007
147
XiaY.TianX.WangJ.QiaoD.LiuX.XiaoL.et al (2018). Treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with NY-ESO-1 specific TCR engineered-T cells in a phase I clinical trial: A case report. Oncol. Lett.16 (6), 6998–7007. 10.3892/ol.2018.9534
148
XieM.WeiJ.XuJ. (2020). Inducers, attractors and modulators of CD4(+) treg cells in non-small-cell lung cancer. Front. Immunol.11, 676. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00676
149
YamadaT.HiraiS.KatayamaY.YoshimuraA.ShiotsuS.WatanabeS.et al (2019). Retrospective efficacy analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med.8 (4), 1521–1529. 10.1002/cam4.2037
150
YeL.LouY.LuL.FanX. (2019). Mesothelin-targeted second generation CAR-T cells inhibit growth of mesothelin-expressing tumors in vivo. Exp. Ther. Med.17 (1), 739–747. 10.3892/etm.2018.7015
151
YeL.ChenX.ZhouF. (2021). EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: Emerging novel drugs. Curr. Opin. Oncol.33 (1), 87–94. 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000701
152
YonesakaK.HirotaniK.KawakamiH.TakedaM.KanedaH.SakaiK.et al (2016). Anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody patritumab sensitizes refractory non-small cell lung cancer to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib. Oncogene35 (7), 878–886. 10.1038/onc.2015.142
153
YuJ.SongY.TianW. (2020). How to select IgG subclasses in developing anti-tumor therapeutic antibodies. J. Hematol. Oncol.13 (1), 45. 10.1186/s13045-020-00876-4
154
YunJ.LeeS. H.KimS. Y.JeongS. Y.KimJ. H.PyoK. H.et al (2020). Antitumor activity of amivantamab (JNJ-61186372), an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, in diverse models of EGFR exon 20 insertion-driven NSCLC.Cancer Discov.10 (8), 1194–1209. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0116
155
ZhangC.LiuJ.ZhongJ. F.ZhangX. (2017). Engineering CAR-T cells. Biomark. Res.5, 22. 10.1186/s40364-017-0102-y
156
ZhangJ.EndresS.KoboldS. (2019). Enhancing tumor T cell infiltration to enable cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy11 (3), 201–213. 10.2217/imt-2018-0111
157
ZhangY.ZhangZ.DingY.FangY.WangP.ChuW.et al (2021). Phase I clinical trial of EGFR-specific CAR-T cells generated by the piggyBac transposon system in advanced relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer patients. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.147 (12), 3725–3734. 10.1007/s00432-021-03613-7
158
ZhaoQ.JiangY.XiangS.KaboliP. J.ShenJ.ZhaoY.et al (2021). Engineered TCR-T cell immunotherapy in anticancer precision medicine: Pros and cons. Front. Immunol.12, 658753. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.658753
159
ZhouQ.WuY. L.ChengY.LiuY.ShuY.CuiJ.et al (2019). Ctong 1509: Phase III study of bevacizumab with or without erlotinib in untreated Chinese patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Ann. Oncol.30, v603. 10.1093/annonc/mdz260.002
160
ZhouC.WangZ.SunY.CaoL.MaZ.WuR.et al (2022). Sugemalimab versus placebo, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (GEMSTONE-302): Interim and final analyses of a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol.23 (2), 220–233. 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00650-1
161
Zito MarinoF.BiancoR.AccardoM.RonchiA.CozzolinoI.MorgilloF.et al (2019). Molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer: From mechanisms of origin to clinical implications. Int. J. Med. Sci.16 (7), 981–989. 10.7150/ijms.34739
Summary
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint inhibitor, bispecific antibodies, TCR-T and CAR-T therapy
Citation
Yang T, Xiong Y, Zeng Y, Wang Y, Zeng J, Liu J, Xu S and Li L-S (2022) Current status of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 13:989461. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989461
Received
08 July 2022
Accepted
30 September 2022
Published
13 October 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Massimo Fantini, Precision Biologics, Inc., United States
Reviewed by
Aurelie Rondon, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
Valerie Vouret-Craviari, Université Côte d'Azur, France
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Yang, Xiong, Zeng, Wang, Zeng, Liu, Xu and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Li-Sheng Li, medlls@zmu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.