Adenosine A_2A and dopamine D₂ receptor interaction controls fatigue resistance

Abstract

Introduction: Caffeine and the selective A_2A receptor antagonist SCH58261 both have ergogenic properties, effectively reducing fatigue and enhancing exercise capacity. This study investigates in male Swiss mice the interaction between adenosine A_2A receptors and dopamine D₂ receptors controlling central fatigue, with a focus on the striatum where these receptors are most abundant.

Methods: We employed DPCPX and SCH58261 to antagonize A₁ and A_2A receptors, caffeine as a non-competitive antagonist for both receptors, and haloperidol as a D₂ receptor antagonist; all compounds were tested upon systemic application and caffeine and SCH58261 were also directly applied in the striatum. Behavioral assessments using the open field, grip strength, and treadmill tests allowed estimating the effect of treatments on fatigue.

Results and discussion: The results suggested a complex interplay between the dopamine and adenosine systems. While systemic DPCPX had little effect on motor performance or fatigue, the application of either caffeine or SCH58261 was ergogenic, and these effects were attenuated by haloperidol. The intra-striatal administration of caffeine or SCH58261 was also ergogenic, but these effects were unaffected by haloperidol. These findings confirm a role of striatal A_2A receptors in the control of central fatigue but suggest that the D₂ receptor-mediated control of the ergogenic effects of caffeine and of A_2A receptor antagonists might occur outside the striatum. This prompts the need of additional efforts to unveil the role of different brain regions in the control of fatigue.

1 Introduction

Central fatigue, characterized by a reduced ability to maintain cognitive and physical performance, stems from intricate neurobiological (Gandevia, 2001; Davis et al., 2003; Meeusen et al., 2006; Aguiar et al., 2020) and metabolic interactions (Glaister, 2005; Wan et al., 2017). Studies linking aerobic performance, oxidative metabolism, and fatigue have shown that blocking brain adenosine receptors increases resistance to physical fatigue (Davis et al., 2003; Aguiar et al., 2020), highlighting the significant role of adenosine in fatigue signaling (Aguiar et al., 2021). Moreover, by integrating pharmacological research with knockout mouse models, we have previously demonstrated that adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2AR) are crucial for the performance-enhancing effects of caffeine (Aguiar et al., 2020). However, non-toxic doses of caffeine selectively antagonize both adenosine A_2A and A₁ receptors to format information flow within brain neuronal circuits (Lopes et al., 2019) and it remains to be clarified if A₁R also play a role in controlling fatigue.

Additionally, we identified a specific role of A_2AR in the striatum for controlling central fatigue (de Bem Alves et al., 2023). Notably, A_2AR interacts closely with dopamine D₂ receptors (D2R) in this region, forming A_2AR-D₂R heteromers (Ferré et al., 2008; Ferré and Ciruela, 2019), a concept pioneered by Kell Fuxe in the early 90’s (Ferré et al., 1991). These interactions are significant in various conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, substance abuse, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), as reviewed in the literature (Fuxe et al., 2003; Ballesteros-Yáñez et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2023). Consequently, the antagonism of D₂R by haloperidol affects the efficacy of A_2AR antagonists in modulating effort-related behaviors (Salamone et al., 2009; Pardo et al., 2012; Rotolo et al., 2023). While A_2AR-D₂R interactions have been observed in other areas of the brain (Pandolfo et al., 2013; Dremencov et al., 2017; Real et al., 2018), their functional significance remains less understood.

This study aimed to evaluate the potential ergogenic effects of selective antagonists for A₁R and A_2AR, along with the non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine. Our objective was to determine whether and how these effects are altered by a D₂R antagonist, particularly in the striatum, an area previously shown to influence central fatigue (Davis et al., 2003; Aguiar et al., 2020; de Bem Alves et al., 2023). Additionally, we venture into new territory by examining the impact of adenosine receptors on exercise physiology, specifically focusing on strength performance, which is predominantly dependent on anaerobic metabolism. This approach allows us to expand our understanding of fatigue mechanisms across various physical activities and metabolic requirements.

2 Methods

2.1 Animals

We used one hundred and twelve (112) male Swiss mice (49.4 ± 1.5 g, 8–10 weeks old), housed in collective cages (38 × 32 × 17 cm) maintained on a 12-h light-dark cycle at a controlled room temperature of 22°C ± 1°C, and food and water ad libitum. The sample size for ANOVA comparison was set at α = 0.05 and β = 0.8. The experimental protocol (CEUA 1503210519) was granted approval by the Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). The assignment of mice to experimental groups was random, with each animal treated as an individual experimental unit for every test.

2.2 Drugs

The first experiments were the systemic treatments. The drug administration schedule was as follows: caffeine at 6.0 mg/kg and SCH58261 at 1.0 mg/kg were administered 15 min before the behavioral tests while haloperidol (Haldol^®) at 250 μg/kg and DPCPX at 1.0 mg/kg were administered 30 min prior. The dosages and administration times for caffeine (Solano et al., 2017; Aguiar et al., 2020; de Bem Alves et al., 2023), SCH58261 (El Yacoubi et al., 2000a; Aguiar et al., 2020), and DPCPX (Griebel et al., 1991; El Yacoubi et al., 2000b; Prediger et al., 2004; Li et al., 2018; Szopa et al., 2018; 2021) were determined based on prior pilot studies and existing evidence. Doses of 0.25–1.0 mg/kg, i.p. of haloperidol were tested in the catalepsy test (Shiozaki et al., 1999; Mihara et al., 2007), showing that 250 μg/kg did not cause either catalepsy or motor impairment (see Results). Caffeine and haloperidol were diluted in saline (0.9% NaCl) whereas SCH58261 and DPCPX were diluted in 5.0% DMSO. Control groups received either saline or DMSO vehicles. The systemic treatment was intraperitoneal (i.p.) at a volume of 10 mL/kg. All drugs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

For stereotactic surgeries, mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine for cannula implantation in both the right (AP 0.5 mm; ML 2.0 mm; DV −3.0 mm) and left (AP 0.5 mm; ML −2.0 mm; DV −3.0 mm) striata, using Paxinos and Franklin’s stereotaxic coordinates (Paxinos and Franklin, 2012). One-week post-surgery, we injected 4 μL at 2 μL/min of either saline, DMSO, caffeine (15 μg) or SCH58261 (2 μg) into the conscious animals immediately before the behavioral tests. Haloperidol (250 μg/kg, i.p) was given 30 min before the behavioral tests. The mortality rate was 5% (10 animals). The placement of the cannulae was verified post-euthanasia by dissecting the mouse brain.

2.3 Motor and fatigue behavioral tests

2.4 Statistical analysis

Data are presented as means ± SEM, generated using GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, United States; www.graphpad.com). Adhering to the intention-to-treat principle, statistical analysis was conducted using STATISTICA version 13.5.0.17 (StatSoft, Inc.; www.statsoft.com). The analyses included one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test and repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test for fatigue resistance (force × time). Effect sizes were evaluated using Cohen’s η², categorizing them as small (0.01), medium (0.09), or large (0.25). Statistical power (β) was also assessed. An alpha level of p < 0.05 was used to determine significance.

2.5 Data availability statement

This work is available as open data under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. For details, see (Speck et al., 2024).

3 Results

Figure 1A displays the dose-response curve of haloperidol in the catalepsy test, which prompted selecting the non-cataleptic dose of 250 μg/kg. As expected, systemic caffeine acted both as a psychostimulant and as an ergogenic agent: it increased open field crossings, an effect mitigated by the non-cataleptic dose of haloperidol (F_3,35 = 4.3, η² = 0.27, β = 0.83, p < 0.05, Figure 1B). In the incremental treadmill test (Figure 1C), caffeine boosted running power, an effect that was not affected by haloperidol (F_3,27 = 3.2, η² = 0.25, β = 0.67, p < 0.05, Figure 1D). In the grip strength test, caffeine enhanced grip time (F_3,35 = 17.5, η² = 0.6, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 1F) and impulse (F_3,34 = 36.4, η² = 0.76, β = 1.0, p < 0.05, Figure 1H) without increasing peak strength (Figure 1E), and haloperidol mitigated these effects. Additionally, caffeine improved the resistance to fatigue in the grip test, a benefit not present in animals also receiving haloperidol (F_30,350 = 4.7, η² = 0.29, β = 1.0, p < 0.05, Figure 1G).

FIGURE 1

When applied directly in the striatum, caffeine also triggered a psychostimulant and ergogenic response: it increased the number of open field crossings (F_2,12 = 31.1, η² = 0.83, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 2A), grip time (F_2,26 = 6.4, η² = 0.055, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 2C), resistance to fatigue (F_8,104 = 4.0, η² = 0.23, β = 0.98, p < 0.05, Figure 2D) and impulse (F_2,12 = 31.1, η² = 0.83, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 2E) without increasing peak strength (Figure 2B). Strikingly, although haloperidol mitigated the psychostimulant effect of caffeine in the open field, it did not alter the ergogenic properties of intra-striatal caffeine in the treadmill and grip tests.

FIGURE 2

Since caffeine non-competitively antagonizes adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors (Fredholm et al., 1999), we exposed animals to DPCPX and SCH58261, which are selective antagonists for these respective receptors. DPCPX administration did not alter any measured behaviors, whereas SCH58261 increased locomotion in the open field; this effect was nullified in the presence of haloperidol (F_3,36 = 11.4, η² = 0.48, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 3A). Figure 3B shows the increase in running power with increased speed. SCH58261 also significantly improved running power in the treadmill test, a gain blocked by haloperidol (F_3,20 = 9.8, η² = 0.59, β = 0.99, p < 0.05, Figure 3C). While treatments did not affect peak grip strength (Figure 3D), SCH58261 enhanced both grip time (F_3,36 = 8.3, η² = 0.41, β = 0.98, p < 0.05, Figure 3E) and area under the curve (AUC, impulse) (F_3,36 = 6.3, η² = 0.34, β = 0.94, p < 0.05, Figure 3G), with haloperidol diminishing these effects. Additionally, haloperidol reduced resistance to fatigue in SCH58261-treated animals (F_12,144 = 1.9, η² = 0.14, β = 0.9, p < 0.05, Figure 3F).

FIGURE 3

Lastly, we assessed the intra-striatal effects of SCH58261, foregoing DPCPX due to its lack of systemic effects. Intra-striatal administration of SCH58261 increased locomotion in the open field, an effect that was mitigated by haloperidol (F_2,12 = 37.7, η² = 0.86, β = 1.00, p < 0.05, Figure 4A). While intra-striatal SCH58261 did not affect peak grip strength (Figure 4B), it prolonged grip time (F_2,27 = 5.5, η² = 0.29, β = 0.80, p < 0.05, Figure 4C) and enhanced impulse (F_2,27 = 5.5, η² = 0.28, β = 0.80, p < 0.05, Figure 4E). All animals exhibited a decline in strength over time, with no significant differences between treatments observed (F_6,81 = 2.7, η² = 0.16, β = 0.84, p < 0.05, Figure 4D). Notably, alterations induced by intra-striatal SCH58261 in grip strength were not modified by haloperidol.

FIGURE 4

All effect sizes were large, except for the resistance to fatigue comparisons following systemic treatment with DPCPX or SCH58261 (Figure 3F), and intra-striatal treatment with caffeine (Figure 2C), which exhibited medium effect sizes. Generally, the statistical power for our analyses was high, exceeding 80%. The only exception was the systemic treatment with caffeine and haloperidol (Figure 1D), which had a statistical power of 67%; however, this did not significantly impact our overall conclusions.

4 Discussion

The present study confirmed that the systemic administration of either caffeine and of the selective antagonist of A_2AR, SCH58261 were ergogenic and that these effects were largely reproduced by the direct injection of caffeine or SCH58261 in the striatum, aligning with previous findings (de Bem Alves et al., 2023) and the general role of striatal A_2AR in effort-related behaviors, reviewed in Chen et al. (2023).

The first novelty provided by this study is the re-enforcement of our previous contention that A_2AR are the likely molecular targets operated by caffeine to produce its ergogenic effects (Aguiar et al., 2020). Physiological concentrations of caffeine, achieved in the brain parenchyma after consuming non-toxic doses, influence neuronal network information flow primarily through A₁R and A_2AR antagonism (Lopes et al., 2019), without involving other mechanisms such as phosphodiesterases or ryanodine receptors, which are activated by toxic caffeine doses (Fredholm et al., 1999). Our findings that caffeine’s ergogenic effects are replicated by the selective A_2AR antagonist SCH58261, but not by the A₁R antagonist DPCPX, provide direct evidence that caffeine’s ergogenic effects are specifically mediated through A_2AR rather than A₁R. Additionally, caffeine’s influence on other behavioral responses that rely on striatal information processing, such as locomotion, arousal, or response to psychostimulants, is also mediated by A_2AR rather than A₁R (El Yacoubi et al., 2000a; Chen et al., 2000). Therefore, the specific involvement of A_2AR, rather than A₁R, observed in the acute effects of caffeine on exercise performance, further supports the significant role of striatal A_2AR in governing caffeine’s ergogenic effects (Aguiar et al., 2020). This is especially pertinent given the high density of A_2AR in the striatum compared to other brain regions, which predominantly exhibit A₁R-mediated effects following acute caffeine exposure (Elmenhorst et al., 2012; Kerkhofs et al., 2018).

Another significant conclusion drawn from this study pertains to the interaction between A_2AR and D₂R in managing exercise endurance. This presumed interplay between A_2AR and D₂R is supported by: i) their co-localization within medium spiny neurons of the striatum (Svenningsson et al., 1997; Canals et al., 2003), a region recognized for the ergogenic effects prompted by caffeine blockade (de Bem Alves et al., 2023); ii) their established functional crosstalk (Hillion et al., 2002; Ferré et al., 2016); iii) their dynamic heteromerization, which results in new receptosomes with novel properties (Canals et al., 2003; Fernández-Dueñas et al., 2015); iv) their interplay in controlling motor activity, the impact of psychostimulants, and effort-related behavioral performance (e.g., Pardo et al., 2013; reviewed in Borroto-Escuela et al., 2018; Nunes et al., 2010; Rotolo et al., 2023). Additionally, dopamine signaling has been experimentally linked to exercise and fatigue (reviewed in Meeusen et al., 2021). Exercise induces a hyperdopaminergic state (Greenwood, 2019) and dopamine depletion correlates with mental fatigue (Moeller et al., 2012; Aguiar et al., 2016; Scheffer et al., 2021). Furthermore, polymorphisms within various components of the dopaminergic system have been associated with fatigue (Malyuchenko et al., 2010), L-DOPA has been shown to alleviate physical fatigue (Lou et al., 2003; Scheffer et al., 2021; de Bem Alves and Aguiar, 2024), and exposure to reserpine, which depletes monoamines, serves as an experimental fatigue model (Scheffer et al., 2021; de Bem Alves and Aguiar, 2024).

Despite these findings, the specific dopamine receptors involved in the control of fatigue and their brain locations remain unclear. The traditional view of striatal dopaminergic signaling suggests a primary role for D₁R, but the simplistic dichotomy of behaviors influenced by D₁R and D₂R in medium spiny neurons is being reevaluated (Soares-Cunha et al., 2016). The improvement of performance with increased forced running is linked to dopamine and specifically to the activation of striatal D₁R and extrastriatal D₂R (Toval et al., 2021). Additionally, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been proposed as important during exhaustive exercise (Bigliassi and Filho, 2022). These insights align with our unexpected findings: i) haloperidol reduces the ergogenic effects of systemically administered caffeine or SCH58261; ii) notably, haloperidol does not affect the ergogenic effects when caffeine or SCH58261 is applied directly to the striatum.

These results lead us to conclude that A_2AR-D₂R interactions play a significant role in regulating exercise endurance and fatigue, predominantly outside the striatum. This suggests that adenosine’s central role in exercise endurance and fatigue might involve primarily changes in striatal circuits, but also modifications in other brain areas. This concept aligns with the noted involvement of striatal and extrastriatal circuits in other behaviors affected by A_2AR-D₂R interplay, such as responses to psychostimulants (reviewed in Borroto-Escuela et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2023). However, this conclusion that the extra-striatal A_2AR-D₂R interplay is involved in ergogenic effects should still be regarded as preliminary since it will require confirmation based on direct pharmacological and genetic manipulations of A_2AR and D₂R only in the striatum and the identification of the brain regions where this interaction takes place to control fatigue. Additionally, future studies should also investigate a putative role of dopamine D₁R, which is also abundantly present in the striatum and other brain regions and has also been reported to tightly interact with adenosine A₁R (Ginés et al., 2000) and dopamine D₂R (Rashid et al., 2007; Frederick et al., 2015).

Interestingly, our current findings indicate that the ergogenic effects of caffeine and SCH58261 are distinct from their psychostimulant properties. This observation is supported by our previous research showing that SCH58261 has both psychostimulant and ergogenic effects in male mice, but only ergogenic effects in females, without clear psychostimulant impacts (Aguiar et al., 2020). This adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting a unique role for various A_2AR populations in different cellular locations in modulating diverse behavioral responses (Shen et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2008; Wei et al., 2014).

In summary, our study confirms the critical role of striatal A_2AR in the adenosine modulation of central fatigue and in the ergogenic responses of A_2AR antagonists. Furthermore, we found a dissociation between the psychostimulant and ergogenic effects of caffeine and SCH58261. In parallel, the ergogenic effects of caffeine and of SCH568261 were controlled by D₂R blockade with haloperidol, but this A_2AR-D₂R interplay seems to mostly occurs in extra-striatal circuits. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the intricate interplay between adenosine and dopamine signaling in striatal and extra-striatal circuits to control central fatigue and other motivational behaviors such as the response to psychostimulants.

References

• 1

  AguiarA. S.LopesS. C.TristãoF. S. M.RialD.de OliveiraG.da CunhaC.et al (2016). Exercise Improves Cognitive Impairment and Dopamine Metabolism in MPTP-Treated Mice. Neurotox. Res.29 (1), 118–125. 10.1007/S12640-015-9566-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AguiarA. S.SpeckA. E.CanasP. M.CunhaR. A. (2020). Neuronal adenosine A2A receptors signal ergogenic effects of caffeine. Sci. Rep.10, 13414. 10.1038/s41598-020-69660-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  AguiarA. S.SpeckA. E.CanasP. M.CunhaR. A. (2021). Deletion of CD73 increases exercise power in mice. Purinergic Signal17, 393–397. 10.1007/S11302-021-09797-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  AS AguiarA. S. I. A. P. C. R. C.AguiarA. S.SpeckA. E.AmaralI. M.CanasP M.CunhaR. A. (2018). The exercise sex gap and the impact of the estrous cycle on exercise performance in mice. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 10742. 10.1038/s41598-018-29050-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  Ballesteros-YáñezI.CastilloC. A.MerighiS.GessiS. (2018). The role of adenosine receptors in psychostimulant addiction. Front. Pharmacol.8, 985. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00985

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  BigliassiM.FilhoE. (2022). Functional significance of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during exhaustive exercise. Biol. Psychol.175, 108442. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108442

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  Borroto-EscuelaD. O.WydraK.FilipM.FuxeK. (2018). A2AR-D2R heteroreceptor complexes in cocaine reward and addiction. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.39, 1008–1020. 10.1016/j.tips.2018.10.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  CanalsM.MarcellinoD.FanelliF.CiruelaF.de BenedettiP.GoldbergS. R.et al (2003). Adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor-receptor heteromerization: qualitative and quantitative assessment by fluorescence and bioluminescence energy transfer. J. Biol. Chem.278, 46741–46749. 10.1074/jbc.M306451200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  ChenJ. F.BeilsteinM.XuY. H.TurnerT. J.MoratallaR.StandaertD. G.et al (2000). Selective attenuation of psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses in mice lacking A2A adenosine receptors. Neuroscience97, 195–204. 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00604-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  ChenJ. F.ChoiD. S.CunhaR. A. (2023). Striatopallidal adenosine A2A receptor modulation of goal-directed behavior: Homeostatic control with cognitive flexibility. Neuropharmacology226, 109421. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109421

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  DavisJ. M.ZhaoZ.StockH. S.MehlK. A.BuggyJ.HandG. A. (2003). Central nervous system effects of caffeine and adenosine on fatigue. Am. J. Physiol.284, 399–404. 10.1152/ajpregu.00386.2002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  de Bem AlvesA. C.AguiarA. S.Jr. (2024). Caffeine plus haloperidol reduces fatigue in an experimental model of Parkinson's disease - a prospective to A2AR-D2R heterodimer antagonism. Purinergic Signal20, 29–34. 10.1007/s11302-023-09933-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  de Bem AlvesA. C.SpeckA. E.FariasH. R.MartinsL. M.dos SantosN. S.PannataG.et al (2023). The striatum drives the ergogenic effects of caffeine. Purinergic Signal19, 673–683. 10.1007/S11302-023-09922-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  DremencovE.LacinovaL.FlikG.FolgeringJ. H.CremersT. I.WesterinkB. H. (2017). Purinergic regulation of brain catecholamine neurotransmission: in vivo electrophysiology and microdialysis study in rats. Gen. Physiol. Biophys.36, 431–441. 10.4149/gpb_2017039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  ElmenhorstD.MeyerP. T.MatuschA.WinzO. H.BauerA. (2012). Caffeine occupancy of human cerebral A1 adenosine receptors: in vivo quantification with 18F-CPFPX and PET. J. Nucl. Med.53, 1723–1729. 10.2967/jnumed.112.105114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  El YacoubiM.LedentC.MénardJ. F.ParmentierM.CostentinJ.VaugeoisJ. M. (2000a). The stimulant effects of caffeine on locomotor behaviour in mice are mediated through its blockade of adenosine A2A receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol.129, 1465–1473. 10.1038/SJ.BJP.0703170

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  El YacoubiM.LedentC.ParmentierM.CostentinJ.VaugeoisJ. M. (2000b). The anxiogenic-like effect of caffeine in two experimental procedures measuring anxiety in the mouse is not shared by selective A2A adenosine receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacol. Berl.148, 153–163. 10.1007/s002130050037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  Fernández-DueñasV.TauraJ. J.CottetM.Gómez-SolerM.López-CanoM.LedentC.et al (2015). Untangling dopamine-adenosine receptor-receptor assembly in experimental parkinsonism in rats. Dis. Models Mech.8, 57–63. 10.1242/dmm.018143

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  FerréS.BonaventuraJ.TomasiD.NavarroG.MorenoE.CortésA.et al (2016). Allosteric mechanisms within the adenosine A2A–dopamine D2 receptor heterotetramer. Neuropharmacology104, 154–160. 10.1016/J.NEUROPHARM.2015.05.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  FerréS.CiruelaF. (2019). Functional and neuroprotective role of striatal adenosine A2A receptor heterotetramers. J. Caffeine Adenosine Res.9, 89–97. 10.1089/caff.2019.0008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  FerréS.QuirozC.WoodsA. S.CunhaR.PopoliP.CiruelaF.et al (2008). An update on adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor interactions: implications for the function of G protein-coupled receptors. Curr. Pharm. Des.14, 1468–1474. 10.2174/138161208784480108

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  FerréS.von EulerG.JohanssonB.FredholmB. B.FuxeK. (1991). Stimulation of high-affinity adenosine A2 receptors decreases the affinity of dopamine D2 receptors in rat striatal membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.88, 7238–7241. 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7238

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  FrederickA. L.YanoH.TrifilieffP.VishwasraoH. D.BiezonskiD.MészárosJ.et al (2015). Evidence against dopamine D1/D2 receptor heteromers. Mol. Psychiatry20, 1373–1385. 10.1038/MP.2014.166

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  FredholmB. B.BättigK.HolménJ.NehligA.ZvartauE. E. (1999). Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol. Rev.51, 83–133.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  FuxeK.AgnatiL. F.JacobsenK.HillionJ.CanalsM.TorvinenM.et al (2003). Receptor heteromerization in adenosine A2A receptor signaling: relevance for striatal function and Parkinson's disease. Neurology61, S19–S23. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000095206.44418.5c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  GandeviaS. C. (2001). Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol. Rev.81, 1725–1789. 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1725

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  GinésS.HillionJ.TorvinenM.Le CromS.CasadóV.CanelaE. I.et al (2000). Dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors form functionally interacting heteromeric complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.97, 8606–8611. 10.1073/PNAS.150241097

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  GlaisterM. (2005). Multiple sprint work: physiological responses, mechanisms of fatigue and the influence of aerobic fitness. Sports Med.35, 757–777. 10.2165/00007256-200535090-00003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  GreenwoodB. N. (2019). The role of dopamine in overcoming aversion with exercise. Brain Res.1713, 102–108. 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.08.030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  GriebelG.Saffroy-SpittlerM.MisslinR.RemmyD.VogelE.BourguignonJ. J. (1991). Comparison of the behavioural effects of an adenosine A1/A2-receptor antagonist, CGS 15943A, and an A1-selective antagonist, DPCPX. Psychopharmacol. Berl.103, 541–544. 10.1007/BF02244256

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  HillionJ.CanalsM.TorvinenM.CasadóV.ScottR.TerasmaaA.et al (2002). Coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization of adenosine A2A receptors and dopamine D2 receptors. J. Biol. Chem.277, 18091–18097. 10.1074/jbc.M107731200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  KerkhofsA.XavierA. C.da SilvaB. S.CanasP. M.IdemaS.BaayenJ. C.et al (2018). Caffeine controls glutamatergic synaptic transmission and pyramidal neuron excitability in human neocortex. Front. Pharmacol.8, 899. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00899

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  LiY.PanX.HeY.RuanY.HuangL.ZhouY.et al (2018). Pharmacological Blockade of Adenosine A2A but not A1 receptors enhances goal-directed valuation in satiety-based instrumental behavior. Front. Pharmacol.9, 393. 10.3389/FPHAR.2018.00393

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  LopesJ. P.PliássovaA.CunhaR. A. (2019). The physiological effects of caffeine on synaptic transmission and plasticity in the mouse hippocampus selectively depend on adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol.166, 313–321. 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.06.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  LouJ. S.KearnsG.BeniceT.OkenB.SextonG.NuttJ. (2003). Levodopa improves physical fatigue in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Mov. Dis.18, 1108–1114. 10.1002/mds.10505

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  MalyuchenkoN. V.SchegolkovaJ. V.KulikovaM. A.TimofeevaM. A.ShlepzovaV. A.SysoevaO. V.et al (2010). Effects of genetic variations in the dopaminergic system on fatigue in humans: gender aspects. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med.149, 226–232. 10.1007/s10517-010-0913-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  MeeusenR.Van CutsemJ.RoelandsB. (2021). Endurance exercise-induced and mental fatigue and the brain. Exp. Physiol.106, 2294–2298. 10.1113/EP088186

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  MeeusenR.WatsonP.HasegawaH.RoelandsB.PiacentiniM. F. (2006). Central fatigue: the serotonin hypothesis and beyond. Sports Med. 10.2165/00007256-200636100-00006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  MiharaT.MiharaK.YarimizuJ.MitaniY.MatsudaR.YamamotoH.et al (2007). Pharmacological characterization of a novel, potent adenosine A1 and A2A receptor dual antagonist, 5-[5-amino-3-(4-fluorophenyl)pyrazin-2-yl]-1-isopropylpyridine-2(1H)-one (ASP5854), in models of Parkinson’s disease and cognition. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.323, 708–719. 10.1124/JPET.107.121962

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  MoellerS. J.TomasiD.HonorioJ.VolkowN. D.GoldsteinR. Z. (2012). Dopaminergic involvement during mental fatigue in health and cocaine addiction. Transl. Psychiatry2, e176. 10.1038/tp.2012.110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41

  NunesE. J.RandallP. A.SanterreJ. L.GivenA. B.SagerT. N.CorreaM.et al (2010). Differential effects of selective adenosine antagonists on the effort-related impairments induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonism. Neuroscience170, 268–280. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 42

  PandolfoP.MachadoN. J.KöfalviA.TakahashiR. N.CunhaR. A. (2013). Caffeine regulates frontocorticostriatal dopamine transporter density and improves attention and cognitive deficits in an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.23, 317–328. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.04.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 43

  PardoM.Lopez-CruzL.ValverdeO.LedentC.BaqiY.MüllerC. E.et al (2012). Adenosine A2A receptor antagonism and genetic deletion attenuate the effects of dopamine D2 antagonism on effort-based decision making in mice. Neuropharmacology62, 2068–2077. 10.1016/J.NEUROPHARM.2011.12.033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 44

  PardoM.López-CruzL.ValverdeO.LedentC.BaqiY.MüllerC. E.et al (2013). Effect of subtype-selective adenosine receptor antagonists on basal or haloperidol-regulated striatal function: studies of exploratory locomotion and c-Fos immunoreactivity in outbred and A2AR KO mice. Beh Brain Res.247, 217–226. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.03.035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 45

  PaxinosG.FranklinK. B. J. (2012) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Springer US. 10.1038/s41467-019-13057-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 46

  PersoniusK. E.JayaramA.KrullD.BrownR.XuT.HanB.et al (2010). Grip force, EDL contractile properties, and voluntary wheel running after postdevelopmental myostatin depletion in mice. J. Appl. Physiol.109, 886–894. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00300.2010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 47

  PredigerR. D. S.BatistaL. C.TakahashiR. N. (2004). Adenosine A1 receptors modulate the anxiolytic-like effect of ethanol in the elevated plus-maze in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol.499, 147–154. 10.1016/J.EJPHAR.2004.07.106

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 48

  RashidA. J.SoC. H.KongM. M. C.FurtakT.El-GhundiM.ChengR.et al (2007). D1-D2 dopamine receptor heterooligomers with unique pharmacology are coupled to rapid activation of Gq/11 in the striatum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.104, 654–659. 10.1073/PNAS.0604049104

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 49

  RealJ. I.SimõesA. P.CunhaR. A.FerreiraS. G.RialD. (2018). Adenosine A2A receptors modulate the dopamine D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission in the mouse prefrontal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci.47, 1127–1134. 10.1111/ejn.13912

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 50

  RotoloR. A.EcevitogluA.PresbyR. E.LindgrenH.MombereauC.NicholasC.et al (2023). Effort-related effects of chronic administration of the DA D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol via subcutaneous programmable minipumps: Reversal by co-administration of the adenosine A2A antagonist istradefylline. Psychopharmacol. Berl.240, 2173–2185. 10.1007/S00213-023-06439-Y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 51

  SalamoneJ. D.FarrarA. M.FontL.PatelV.SchlarD. E.NunesE. J.et al (2009). Differential actions of adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D2 antagonism. Beh Brain Res.201, 216–222. 10.1016/J.BBR.2009.02.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 52

  SchefferD. D. L.FreitasF. C.AguiarA. S.JrWardC.GuglielmoL. G. A.PredigerR. D.et al (2021). Impaired dopamine metabolism is linked to fatigability in mice and fatigue in Parkinson's disease patients. Brain Comm.3, fcab116. 10.1093/braincomms/fcab116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 53

  ShenH. Y.CoelhoJ. E.OhtsukaN.CanasP. M.DayY. J.HuangQ. Y.et al (2008). A critical role of the adenosine A2A receptor in extrastriatal neurons in modulating psychomotor activity as revealed by opposite phenotypes of striatum and forebrain A2A receptor knock-outs. J. Neurosci.28, 2970–2975. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5255-07.2008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 54

  ShiozakiS.IchikawaS.NakamuraJ.KitamuraS.YamadaK.KuwanaY. (1999). Actions of adenosine A2A receptor antagonist KW-6002 on drug-induced catalepsy and hypokinesia caused by reserpine or MPTP. Psychopharmacol. Berl.147, 90–95. 10.1007/s002130051146

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 55

  Soares-CunhaC.CoimbraB.SousaN.RodriguesA. J. (2016). Reappraising striatal D1-and D2-neurons in reward and aversion. Neurosc Biobehav Rev.68, 370–386. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 56

  SolanoA. F.SchefferD. da L.AlvesA.C. de B.JrA. S. A.LatiniA. (2017). Potential pitfalls when investigating the ergogenic effects of caffeine in mice. J. Syst. Integr. Neurosci.3, 1–4. 10.15761/jsin.1000156

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  SpeckA. E.de Bem AlvesA. C.AguiarA. S. (2024). A2A and D2 Receptor Interaction Enhances Fatigue Resistance: Dataset Overview. https://Osf.Io/4b6vw/.

  • Google Scholar

• 58

  SvenningssonP.Le MoineC.KullB.SunaharaR.BlochB.FredholmB. B. (1997). Cellular expression of adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA in the rat central nervous system with special reference to dopamine innervated areas. Neuroscience80, 1171–1185. 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00180-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  SzopaA.BogatkoK.HerbetM.SerefkoA.OstrowskaM.WośkoS.et al (2021). The interaction of selective A1 and A2A adenosine receptor antagonists with magnesium and zinc ions in mice: behavioural, biochemical and molecular studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 1840–1925. 10.3390/IJMS22041840

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  SzopaA.PoleszakE.BogatkoK.WyskaE.WośkoS.DoboszewskaU.et al (2018). DPCPX, a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, enhances the antidepressant-like effects of imipramine, escitalopram, and reboxetine in mice behavioral tests. Naunyn Schmiedeb. Arch. Pharmacol.391, 1361–1371. 10.1007/s00210-018-1551-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  TakeshitaH.YamamotoK.NozatoS.InagakiT.TsuchimochiH.ShiraiM.et al (2017). Modified forelimb grip strength test detects aging-associated physiological decline in skeletal muscle function in male mice. Sci. Rep.7, 42323–42329. 10.1038/srep42323

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  TovalA.GarrigosD.KutsenkoY.PopovićM.Do-CoutoB. R.Morales-DelgadoN.et al (2021). Dopaminergic modulation of forced running performance in adolescent rats: role of striatal D1 and extra-striatal D2 dopamine receptors. Mol. Neurobiol.58, 1782–1791. 10.1007/s12035-020-02252-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  WanJ. J.QinZ.WangP. Y.SunY.LiuX. (2017). Muscle fatigue: general understanding and treatment. Exp. Mol. Med.49, e384. 10.1038/emm.2017.194

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  WeiC. J.AugustoE.GomesC. A.SingerP.WangY.BoisonD.et al (2014). Regulation of fear responses by striatal and extrastriatal adenosine A2A receptors in forebrain. Biol. Psychiatry75, 855–863. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  YuL.ShenH. Y.CoelhoJ. E.AraújoI. M.HuangQ. Y.DayY. J.et al (2008). Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists exert motor and neuroprotective effects by distinct cellular mechanisms. Ann. Neurol.63, 338–346. 10.1002/ana.21313

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar