Abstract
Background:
Unstable angina pectoris (UAP) is a cardiovascular disease with high morbidity and can cause serious cardiovascular complications. Oral preparations of single-source traditional Chinese medicines (SSTCM-OPs) are increasingly used as adjuncts to conventional treatments (CT) for UAP, providing complementary therapeutic advantages with favorable safety profiles. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of these SSTCM-OPs remain unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluates the efficacy and safety of 11 approved SSTCM-OPs to guide clinical practice in UAP treatment.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across eight databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining SSTCM-OPs combined with CT for UAP were included. The search covered publications up to 4 December 2024. Quality assessment was performed using RevMan 5.4.1, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADEpro software 3.6.1. A frequentist random-effects model was employed for NMA. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 18.0.
Results:
A total of 72 RCTs involving 11 SSTCM-OPs and 7,360 patients were included. The NMA results demonstrated that Maixuekang oral preparation combined with CT and Xinyue oral preparation combined with CT showed superiority in terms of angina efficacy; Xindakang oral preparation combined with CT and Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation combined with CT showed superiority in terms of Electrocardiogram (ECG) efficacy and had an advantage in reducing nitroglycerin dosages; Xindakang oral preparation combined with CT and Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation combined with CT showed superiority in reducing nitroglycerin dosages; Zhenyuan oral preparation combined with CT and Diaoxinxuekang oral preparation combined with CT showed superiority in reducing frequency of angina; Xinnaoshutong oral preparation combined with CT and Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation combined with CT showed superiority in reducing duration of angina; Xuezhikang oral preparation combined with CT showed superiority in improving TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C levels as well as reducing the occurrence of MACEs; Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation combined with CT showed superiority in improving TG and PV levels; Lastly, Xuesaitong oral preparation combined with CT and Yinxingye oral preparation showed superiority in reducing hs-CRP levels.
Conclusion:
All 11 SSTCM-OPs combined with CT showed advantages over CT alone in treating UAP. Notably, Xinnaoshutong + CT did not significantly reduce angina frequency, but it was effective in other outcomes. These findings suggest incorporating traditional Chinese medicine into standardized treatment regimens may enhance UAP management.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024618094.
1 Introduction
Unstable angina pectoris (UAP) is classically defined as a common acute coronary syndrome characterized by myocardial ischemia in the absence of myocardial necrosis (; Reichlin et al., 2013; Zaacks et al., 1999). The China Cardiovascular Health and Disease Report 2023 reveals that the number of individuals diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CHD) in China has escalated to 11.39 million, while the annual admissions of adult patients hospitalized for CHD have surged to 6.127 million. Among these cases, unstable angina pectoris constitutes the predominant discharge diagnosis, representing 38.1% of the total (National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, 2024). Chronic angina pectoris frequently leads to severe cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction and heart failure, thereby markedly elevating the risk to patient health and safety.
Notably, the pathophysiological mechanisms of unstable angina pectoris and acute coronary syndrome (ACS, including myocardial infarction) have traditionally been attributed to the rupture of a single vulnerable plaque, characterized by a thin fibrous cap, large lipid core, and substantial inflammatory cell infiltration (e.g., macrophages and lymphocytes) (Hansson et al., 2015; Libby, 2001). This rupture leads to local thrombus formation, resulting in myocardial ischemia and acute symptoms (Libby, 2001). However, studies have shown that in unstable angina patients, neutrophils and other inflammatory cells are activated throughout the coronary artery system, not just at the site of the “culprit lesion” (; Libby et al., 2018). Thus, the pathogenesis of ACS is now understood as a combination of local plaque rupture and a systemic inflammatory response.
The currently recognized pharmacological treatments for UAP primarily include nitrates, β-blockers, statins, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, P2Y12 receptor antagonists, and anticoagulants (; ; ). Given the diverse mechanisms of action and side effects of antianginal medications, their use should be tailored to the patient’s medical history and potential drug interactions. Nevertheless, individualized pharmacotherapy continues to pose considerable challenges, due to the limited availability of reliable data from large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (Manfredi et al., 2022). Moreover, current evidence reveals that no single class of drugs has been found to simultaneously improve quality of life and prevent cardiovascular events, which presents another major challenge (Ferrari et al., 2018).
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plays a significant role in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), with its holistic regulatory approach and emphasis on personalized treatment aligning closely with the core principles of CAM (; Wang and Zhang, 2017). With the advancement of modern biotechnology, an increasing number of traditional Chinese medicines with remarkable bioactive properties have been extracted and standardized, then processed into preparations under strict quality control, ultimately applied to disease treatment (Fu et al., 2024; Sun et al., 2015). At present, traditional Chinese medicine preparations are divided into compound preparations and single-source preparations according to the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (National Pharmacopoeia Commission, 2020). In this context, oral preparations of single-source traditional Chinese medicines (SSTCM-OPs) are emerging as a promising complementary approach for unstable angina pectoris, which offer additional benefits such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant effects, inhibition of platelet aggregation, and vasodilatory effects (Tao et al., 2022; Zhang W. et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2025). These properties are particularly valuable in addressing some of the gaps left by conventional treatments (CT). Thus, we manually searched the 2024 edition of China’s National Catalogue of Medicines for Basic Medical Insurance, Work Injury Insurance and Maternity Insurance, and identified the following 11 SSTCM-OPs approved for the treatment of UAP: Zhenyuan oral preparation (ZY), Xuesaitong oral preparation (XST), Xinyue oral preparation (XY), Diaoxinxuekang oral preparation (DAXXK), Xuezhikang oral preparation (XZK), Yinxingye oral preparation (YXY), Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation (YXTZ), Xindakang oral preparation (XDK), Xinnaoshutong oral preparation (XNST), Dazhuhongjingtian oral preparation (DZHJT) and Maixuekang oral preparation (MXK).
Several meta-analyses (Liu et al., 2024a; Man et al., 2020; Song et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2013) have shown that single-source TCM preparations, including XST, DZHJT, YXY, and YXTZ, when used in combination with conventional treatments, reduce symptoms, improve patient outcomes, and maintain a favorable safety profile for UAP. Although some of these studies included both oral and injectable forms, our analysis focuses specifically on the oral preparations. Additionally, oral preparations such as XZK and MXK have shown efficacy in improving lipid levels in UAP patients, thereby providing safer, more effective cardiovascular treatment options (; Zhou, 2019). Despite these advantages, the lack of head-to-head trials for these preparations makes it difficult to determine which specific drugs may offer the greatest therapeutic advantage as adjunctive therapies, leading to uncertainty among clinicians when selecting treatments in clinical practice. Network meta-analysis (NMA) integrates both direct and indirect evidence, allowing for the ranking of the effectiveness of multiple interventions (Nino and Brignardello-Petersen, 2023). Therefore, we employed NMA to assess the efficacy of various interventions based on RCTs and report their safety profiles, aiming to assist clinicians in identifying the optimal treatment options.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Registration and reporting
This systematic review and network meta-analysis were registered in the international prospective systematic review registration database PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024618094). This study strictly followed the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the PRISMA-extension statement for NMA (Hutton et al., 2015; Shamseer et al., 2015).
2.2 Standard evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine
In order to address terminological ambiguity and avoid misuse, we standardized the scientific names of the included Chinese medicines by referring to the relevant recommendations (Rivera et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2022), and the following three websites: “The World Flora Online” (WFO, http://www.worldfloraonline.org/), “China Animal Scientific Database” (CASD, http://www.zoology.csdb.cn/) and “Species Diversity Data Platform” (SDDP, http://www.especies.cn/). The main details of the Chinese medicine oral preparations are shown in Table 1. Supplementary Material S1 provides detailed information on the chemical metabolites of oral preparations of single-source traditional Chinese medicines.
TABLE 1
| Drug name | Latin name | Family | Drug part used | Main bioactive metabolites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhenyuan oral preparation | Panax ginseng C.A.Mey. | Araliaceae | Fruit | Notoginsenoside (R1, etc.) and ginsenoside (Rg1, Rb1, Re, Rf, etc.) |
| Xuesaitong oral preparation | Panax notoginseng (Burkill) F.H.Chen | Araliaceae | Root and rhizome | Notoginsenoside (R1, etc.) and Ginsenoside (Rg1, Rb1, Re, Rf, Rd, etc.) |
| Xinyue oral preparation | Panax quinquefolius L. | Araliaceae | Stem and foliage | Ginsenoside (Rg1, Rb1, Re, Rd, etc.) and Pseudoginsenoside F11 |
| Diaoxinxuekang oral preparation | Dioscorea panthaica Prain & Burkill or Dioscorea nipponica Makino | Dioscoreaceae | Stem and foliage | Protodioscin, Dioscin and Pseudoprodioscin |
| Xuezhikang oral preparation | Monascus purpureus Went. | — | — | Lovastatin hydroxy acid, Mevastatin and Lovastatin, etc. |
| Yinxingye oral preparation | Ginkgo biloba L. | Ginkgoaceae | Foliage | Ginkgolide (A, B, C, J(M)), bilobalide, rutin, quercetin, kaempferitin, and isorhamnetin, etc. |
| Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation | Ginkgo biloba L. | Ginkgoaceae | Foliage | Ginkgolide (A, B, C, J(M)), bilobalide, rutin, quercetin, kaempferitin, and isorhamnetin, etc. |
| Xindakang oral preparation | Hippophae rhamnoides L. | Elaeagnaceae | Fruit | Quercetin, kaempferitin and isorhamnetin |
| Xinnaoshutong oral preparation | Tribulus terrestris L. | Zygophyllaceae | Grass | Terrestrinin, rutin, quercetin, kaempferitin, and isorhamnetin, etc. |
| Dazhuhongjingtian oral preparation | Rhodiola crenulata (Hook.f. and Thomson) H.Ohba | Crassulaceae | Root and rhizome | Gallic acid, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, rhodiocyanoside A, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, spruce glycoside and rhodioloside, etc. |
| Maixuekang oral preparation | Whitmania pigra Whitman or Whitmania acranutata Whitman or Hirudo nipponica Whitman | Hirudinidae | Dry whole | Hirudin and thrombin-inhibiting peptide, etc. |
Main details of the Chinese medicine oral preparations.
2.3 Search strategy
Eight databases were searched: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from the database inception of each database up to 4 December 2024. Search strategies integrated subject terms and free terms. The English search strategy included the following key components: “Zhenyuan,” “Xuesaitong,” “Xinyue,” “Diaoxinxuekang,” “Xuezhikang,” “Yinxingye,” “Ginkgo ketone ester,” “Xindakang,” “Xinnaoshutong,” “Dazhuhongjingtian,” “Maixuekang” “Coronary Disease,” “Acute Coronary Syndrome,” “Angina Unstable,” “Myocardial Ischemia,” “Angina Pectoris” and “Randomized Controlled.” The detailed screening process is illustrated in Figure 1, specific search strategies are provided in Supplementary Material S2.
FIGURE 1
2.4 Eligibility criteria
The eligibility criteria, using PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study design) as the main framework, are as follows.
2.4.1 Study design
Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, with no restrictions on blinding method or language.
2.4.2 Population
Patients must meet the UAP diagnostic criteria recognized at the time of study publication, or alternatively, their diagnostic typing of UAP was confirmed. Patients in any of the following conditions were excluded: acute myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, bleeding tendency, severe liver or kidney disease, or malignancy, with a life expectancy of less than 1 year, and no restrictions on gender, race, region, or age.
2.4.3 Interventions/comparators
The control groups were receiving exclusively conventional treatments (CT) of UAP, which mainly consisted of nitrates, β-blockers, calcium antagonists, morphine sulfate, nicorandil, trimetazidine, aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and statins. Whereas the treatment group was treated with the 11 most commonly used SSTCM-OPs combined with CT, or the comparison between any two SSTCM-OPs on the basis of conventional treatments. Studies that did not meet the above inclusion criteria were excluded. SSTCM-OPs covered all oral dosage forms, including capsule, tablet, dispersion, pill, cream, elixir, drop, granule, oral liquid, and all injectable interventions were excluded. There is no restriction on the dosages and manufacturers. Different dosage forms of the same SSTCM-OP were grouped for NMA. For instance, Zhenyuan oral preparation includes Zhenyuan tablet, Zhenyuan capsule, and Zhenyuan oral liquid; we use Zhenyuan (ZY) as a unified combination for NMA to find the optimal therapeutic solution.
2.4.4 Outcome measures
Angina efficacy and Electrocardiogram (ECG) efficacy were classified into three outcomes: “significantly effective,” “effective,” and “ineffective,” based on the criteria established by China’s official medical organization (; Liu et al., 1998). For angina efficacy, “significantly effective” was defined as an over 80% reduction in angina frequency after treatment; “effective” was defined as an over 50% reduction in angina frequency but not exceeding 80% after treatment; “ineffective” was defined as a reduction in angina frequency of less than 50%, or no change in frequency after treatment. For ECG efficacy, “significantly effective” was defined as a recovery of the ST segment on the resting ECG by more than 0.1 mV, or a return to normal ST segment levels; “effective” was defined as a reduction in resting ECG ST segment depression of less than 0.05 mV, an improvement of more than 0.05 mV, or a T wave inversion becoming shallower by more than 50% or changing from flat to upright; “ineffective” was defined as an improvement of the ST segment by less than 0.05 mV, or no change in the T wave (Zheng, 2002). The two aforementioned indicators were employed as the primary endpoints for evaluation. Meanwhile, duration of angina, frequency of angina, and nitroglycerin dosages are commonly used indicators to evaluate the condition of angina pectoris. As a marker of the inflammatory state of vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaque and coronary artery disease activity, high-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hs-CRP) is of great significance in predicting future cardiovascular events (; Schillinger et al., 2003). Plasma viscosity (PV) is also a risk factor for predicting future cardiovascular events, and can be used to evaluate blood flow and assess the body’s circulatory status (Tzoulaki et al., 2007). Meanwhile, maintaining optimal lipid levels can slow down the progression of atherosclerosis, which is of great significance for preventing cardiovascular events (Ference et al., 2018). Therefore, the above indicators are also evaluated as secondary outcomes.
In summary, the Primary outcome: 1) Angina efficacy (Significantly effective + Effective), 2) ECG efficacy (Significantly effective + Effective). Secondary outcome: 1) Nitroglycerin dosages, 2) Frequency of angina, 3) Duration of angina (min/times), 4) Total cholesterol (TC), 5) Triglyceride (TG), 6) Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), 7) High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), 8) hs-CRP, 9) PV, 10) Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).
In addition, the exclusion criteria were applied: 1) Duplicate publications; 2) Use of other TCM treatment measures (e.g., other commercial Chinese polyherbal preparations, acupuncture, or other traditional therapies) in both groups; 3) Non-clinical studies (animal experiments), reviews, low-quality studies, inappropriate participant selection, non-compliant interventions, irrelevant outcomes, unavailable full text, or non-RCT study designs; 4) Incorrect or incomplete data in the literature.
2.5 Study selection and data extraction
Two researchers (XcL and XZ) independently screened the literature and extracted the data. After removing duplicate studies, the titles and abstracts of the remaining articles were reviewed for initial screening. Full texts were then read and re-screened according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine the final eligible studies. Data extraction, including baseline characteristics, interventions, and outcomes, was performed using Microsoft Excel 2019. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion to reach consensus or by consulting a third-party reviewer (TW). In cases where standard deviations were not explicitly reported, alternative statistical parameters, including standard errors, confidence intervals, or relevant test statistics (t/p values), were utilized to calculate standard deviation. Following the Cochrane Handbook recommendations, multiple attempts (at least three email contacts) were made to obtain missing data directly from the corresponding authors. For graphical data without numerical values, extraction was performed using GetData Graph Digitizer 2.20, with results cross-verified by two independent researchers to ensure accuracy.
2.6 Quality assessment and certainty of evidence
Two reviewers (XhL and XX) evaluated the methodological quality of included RCTs using the risk-of-bias tool from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins et al., 2011), as implemented in RevMan 5.4.1. The assessment indicators consisted of 7 domains: random sequence generation (selection bias); allocation concealment (selection bias); blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias); blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias); incomplete outcome data (attrition bias); selective reporting (reporting bias); other bias. The risk of bias was categorized as “high risk,” “low risk,” and “some concerns” for each item. Disagreements, if any, were resolved by a third-party reviewer (RS).
In this study, the certainty of evidence was systematically evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework (Kavanagh, 2009). Following GRADE guidelines, potential downgrades in evidence certainty were assessed across five key domains: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. These evaluations were conducted using GRADEpro software 3.6.1 to standardize the process by two reviewers (XhL and RS). Final evidence ratings were rated as four levels: high, moderate, low, and very low.
2.7 Statistical analysis
Stata 18.0 software was used for statistical analyses and network plotting. Initially, we conducted a pairwise meta-analysis to assess the direct comparisons between various SSTCM-OPs and the control group. All results were expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, with a threshold of 50% to determine the appropriate analytical model. Significant heterogeneity, evidenced by an I2 value exceeding 50%, prompted the use of a random-effects model to account for between-study variability. When the I2 statistic was 50% or lower, suggesting minimal or no substantial heterogeneity, a fixed-effects model was employed to provide more precise estimates.
This NMA was performed using a frequentist approach with a random-effects model, synthesizing both direct and indirect evidence from all eligible studies to compare the effectiveness of multiple interventions. Binary outcomes used relative risk (RR), continuous outcomes with consistent units used mean difference (MD), and continuous outcomes with differing units used standardized mean difference (SMD). In the frequentist framework of NMA, the transitivity assumption was evaluated by visually inspecting the network plot and statistically assessing the consistency of treatment effects across studies. The network plot illustrates the comparisons between interventions, where lines connecting nodes represent direct comparisons between two interventions, and indirect comparisons are inferred through the network structure. In the plot, the line width indicates the number of studies directly comparing interventions, while the node size reflects the total number of participants across studies. If the evidence network contained closed loops of evidence, inconsistency tests were conducted; otherwise, a consistency model was used. As no closed evidence loops existed among the interventions included in this NMA, only a consistency model was adopted.
Subsequently, consistency between direct and indirect evidence was evaluated using a global approach (treatment-by-interaction model) to test for overall inconsistency across the network, supplemented by a local approach (node-splitting method) to identify specific discrepancies between direct and indirect comparisons for each treatment contrast. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank the efficacy of each SSTCM-OP and determine the most effective intervention. SUCRA values range from 0 to 1, reflecting the relative likelihood of each intervention being ranked as the most effective, with higher values indicating better outcomes (Mbuagbaw et al., 2017).
Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis to mitigate confounding factors and explore sources of heterogeneity. Meanwhile, meta-regression analysis was specifically implemented for the XZK + CT regimen, with rigorous examination of the temporal relationship linking treatment course (weeks) to LDL-C reduction (mmol/L). This specific analytical focus was mandated by the singular availability of sufficient data (≥10 studies) meeting our pre-established criteria for reliable covariate-effect estimation. Non-informative priors were specified for regression coefficients (β) to ensure data-driven estimation, and covariate significance was determined via 95% confidence intervals excluding the null value and p-values (<0.05). Publication bias was assessed by drawing funnel plots to evaluate small-study effects, where asymmetry in the plot may indicate potential bias.
3 Results
3.1 Study selection and characteristics
Initially, 4,225 studies were found through search queries, and 2,464 studies remained after duplicate removal via EndNote 20. 480 studies were retained after excluding animal experiments, reviews, low-quality studies, improper participants, improper interventions, and different study types by screening titles and abstracts. After full-text review, we excluded studies for various reasons, including duplicates, unavailable full text, low-quality studies, improper participants, improper interventions, irrelevant outcomes, and different study types. As a result, 408 studies were excluded. Ultimately, a total of 72 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. The detailed screening process is illustrated in Figure 1. Across 72 studies, 7,360 patients were involved, with 3,707 in the treatment group and 3,653 in the control group, examining 11 SSTCM-OPs. The number of included studies for each preparation is as follows: Zhenyuan oral preparation (2 RCTs) (Liu Q. et al., 2018; Wang, 2022), Xuesaitong oral preparation (12 RCTs) (; ; Fan and Zhang, 2023; Feng et al., 2009; Ge and Zhao, 2010; Huang and Zhang, 2023; Kuang et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2017; Wei, 2010; Yu, 2010; Zhao, 2002), Xinyue oral preparation (3 RCTs) (Liu, 2015; Lu, 2022; Zhang R. et al., 2020), Diaoxinxuekang oral preparation (4 RCTs) (Xu and Fang, 2019; Xu, 2020; Xu, 2016; Yu et al., 2023), Xuezhikang oral preparation (14 RCTs) (; ; ; ; ; Lin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Ma and Deng, 2019; Ma et al., 2014; Ren and Peng, 2006; Su et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2006; Xiong et al., 2008; Zhu and Li, 2008), Yinxingye oral preparation (10 RCTs) (; ; Gao and Gao, 2013; He, 2014; Jia, 2014; Sun et al., 2024; Wang and Sun, 2012; Xia and Zhang, 2003; Yu and Yang, 2023; Zhang et al., 2011), Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation (10 RCTs) (; Huang, 2016; Li et al., 2019; Liu, 2020; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Luo and Yu, 2013; Peng et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2022; Song, 2021; Wu, 2014), Xindakang oral preparation (3 RCTs) (Huang, 2022; Huang, 2018; Li et al., 2003), Xinnaoshutong oral preparation (3 RCTs) (Ma et al., 2009; Wang, 2015; Zhang et al., 2012), Dazhuhongjingtian oral preparation (2 RCTs) (Liu and Zhu, 2019; Shen et al., 2014) and Maixuekang oral preparation (9 RCTs) (; ; Gao, 2010; Hao, 2022; Li, 2014; Luo, 2013; Wang et al., 2012; Xing and Lv, 2015; Yue and Zhang, 2013). The basic characteristics of the included studies in this NMA are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
| Included studies | Sample (T/C) | Sex (M/F) | Age (years) | Manufacturer | Specification/dosage form | Intervention | Course (weeks) | Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | C | T | C | T | C | ||||||
| Liu et al. (2018a) | 40/40 | 23/17 | 25/15 | 67.38 ± 11.25 | 66.60 ± 14.56 | Yisheng | 0.25 g/capsule | ZY 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①②⑩ |
| Wang (2022) | 41/41 | 24/17 | 23/18 | 58.90 ± 5.60 | 58.79 ± 6.45 | Yisheng | 0.25 g/capsule | ZY 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①②④⑤⑩ |
| Wang et al. (2017) | 40/40 | 17/23 | 21/19 | 70.68 ± 6.87 | 71.65 ± 4.32 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ⑥⑦⑧⑨ |
| Fan and Zhang (2023) | 88/88 | 60/28 | 56/32 | 57.39 ± 9.12 | 58.19 ± 8.48 | Kpc | 0.10 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 2 | ①⑩ |
| 40/38 | 32/8 | 24/14 | 62.23 ± 8.40 | 61.89 ± 7.52 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ⑥⑦⑧ | |
| Huang and Zhang (2023) | 34/34 | 16/18 | 17/17 | 52.5 ± 5.4 | 55.3 ± 7.9 | Kpc | 0.10 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①③④⑤ |
| Yu (2010) | 50/50 | 29/21 | 28/22 | 64.18 ± 12.13 | 62.8 ± 10.8 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ①②⑫ |
| Ge and Zhao (2010) | 48/48 | 22/26 | 25/23 | 56 | 54 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ①② |
| Wei (2010) | 90/90 | 113/67 | 60.4 ± 3.5 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ①②④⑤ | ||
| Feng et al. (2009) | 32/30 | 16/16 | 17/13 | 68.79 | 69.12 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ①②⑪ |
| Zhao (2002) | 23/23 | 28/18 | 60.6 ± 11.3 | NA | capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | NA | ③⑫ | ||
| 43/41 | 32/11 | 28/13 | 65.38 ± 8.68 | 63.63 ± 7.05 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ④⑤⑥⑦⑧⑨⑫ | |
| Liu et al. (2008) | 30/30 | NA | 64.6 ± 5.4 | 63.6 ± 4.5 | Weihe | 0.06 g/capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ①⑥⑦⑧⑨ | |
| Kuang et al. (2011) | 90/90 | 47/43 | 46/44 | 56.3 ± 6.9 | 57.1 ± 7.2 | Shenghuo | 0.33 g/soft capsule | XST 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 4 | ①④⑤ |
| Zhang et al. (2020b) | 45/45 | 32/13 | 31/14 | 57.8 ± 7.5 | 58.4 ± 6.9 | Yisheng | 0.30 g/capsule | XY 0.6 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①③④⑤ |
| Lu (2022) | 39/39 | 25/14 | 27/12 | 55.69 ± 5.71 | 55.26 ± 5.63 | Yisheng | 0.30 g/capsule | XY 0.6 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ④⑤ |
| Liu (2015) | 48/48 | 58/38 | 63.6 | Yisheng | 0.30 g/capsule | XY 0.6 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ① | ||
| Xu (2020) | 29/29 | 18/11 | 17/12 | 64.82 ± 5.66 | 65.77 ± 5.25 | Diao | 0.10 g/capsule | DAXXK 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 2 | ①⑪ |
| Xu and Fang (2019) | 60/60 | 40/20 | 41/19 | 66.48 ± 10.3 | 67.93 ± 12.07 | Diao | 0.10 g/capsule | DAXXK 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 1 | ①②④⑤ |
| Xu (2016) | 56/56 | 30/26 | 32/24 | 58.9 ± 8.2 | 59.6 ± 8.4 | Diao | 0.10 g/capsule | DAXXK 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 2 | ①④⑤⑪ |
| Yu et al. (2023) | 53/53 | 27/26 | 29/24 | 66.87 ± 11.81 | 65.89 ± 12.34 | Diao | 0.35 g/soft capsule | DAXXK 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 2 | ①③④⑤⑩ |
| 41/41 | 27/14 | 25/16 | 64.2 ± 11.2 | 64.4 ± 11.4 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 12 | ①⑫ | |
| Liu et al. (2013) | 42/40 | 25/17 | 24/16 | 63.4 ± 10.5 | 62.9 ± 10.3 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 48 | ⑦⑧⑩⑫ |
| Wang et al. (2006) | 30/30 | 34/26 | 60.5 ± 10.6 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 2 | ⑧⑨ | ||
| 33/25 | 19/14 | 17/8 | 57 ± 9 | 56 ± 8 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 8 | ①②⑥⑦⑧⑨ | |
| Ren and Peng (2006) | 38/30 | 28/10 | 26/4 | 62.0 ± 7.6 | 61.0 ± 7.2 | WBL Biotech | capsule | XZK 2 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①② |
| 31/31 | 16/15 | 17/14 | 68.3 ± 6.9 | 68.7 ± 7.2 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 0.6 g qd + CT | CT | 12 | ①⑥⑦⑧⑨⑫ | |
| Ma and Deng (2019) | 76/74 | 78/72 | 55.0 ± 5.8 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 24 | ④⑤⑥⑦⑧⑨ | ||
| Su et al. (2017) | 80/80 | 42/38 | 45/35 | 57.8 ± 10.9 | 58.5 ± 10.4 | WBL Biotech | 0.40 g/tablet | XZK 0.8 g bid + CT | CT | 12 | ①⑥⑦⑧⑨ |
| Lin et al. (2009) | 24/24 | 14/10 | 13/11 | 55.4 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 24 | ①⑥⑧⑫ | |
| 32/32 | NA | 48–82 | WBL Biotech | capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 4 | ⑥⑦⑧⑨⑩ | |||
| 58/58 | 30/28 | 29/29 | 63.15 ± 9.18 | 62.85 ± 9.26 | WBL Biotech | capsule | XZK 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 48 | ⑥⑦⑧⑩ | |
| Xiong et al. (2008) | 62/40 | 43/19 | 27/13 | 56.1 ± 8.2 | 55.2 ± 8.4 | WBL Biotech | capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 8 | ⑥⑦⑧⑨⑩ |
| Ma et al. (2014) | 80/80 | NA | 56.53 ± 13.71 | WBL Biotech | 0.30 g/capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 2 | ⑥⑦⑧⑨ | ||
| Zhu and Li (2008) | 42/42 | 48/36 | 54 (42–68) | WBL Biotech | capsule | XZK 0.6 g bid + CT | CT | 24 | ①⑥⑦⑧⑨ | ||
| Gao and Gao (2013) | 47/47 | 24/23 | 26/21 | 64.7 ± 7.2 | 65.5 ± 7.6 | Wepon | Ginkgo biloba extract 16m g/drop pill | YXY 5 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 12 | ①③④ |
| Jia (2014) | 59/59 | 37/22 | 39/20 | 66.5 ± 5.6 | 65.9 ± 6.1 | Wepon | 0.063 g/drop pill | YXY 5 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①② |
| Wang and Sun (2012) | 60/60 | 73/47 | 61.6 ± 7.8 | Wepon | Ginkgo biloba extract 16m g/drop pill | YXY 5 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①② | ||
| 85/85 | 60/25 | 63/23 | 56.23 | 53.44 | Wepon | Ginkgo biloba extract 16m g/drop pill | YXY 5 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 4 | ① | |
| Zhang et al. (2011) | 45/45 | 57/33 | 65.3 ± 9.6 | Wepon | Ginkgo biloba extract 16m g/drop pill | YXY 5 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①② | ||
| He (2014) | 55/53 | 78/30 | 65.3 ± 5.62 | Wepon | Ginkgo biloba extract 16m g/drop pill | YXY 5 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 1 | ①② | ||
| Sun et al. (2024) | 180/180 | 96/84 | 85/95 | 61.32 ± 11.09 | 61.28 ± 10.28 | Yangtze River | 19.2 mg of total flavonol glycosides and 4.8 mg of terpene lactones/tablet | YXY 1 tablet tid + CT | CT | 4 | ④⑤ |
| Yu and Yang (2023) | 35/35 | 17/18 | 16/19 | 64.85 ± 7.38 | 62.74 ± 7.81 | Senke | 9.6 mg of total flavonol glycosides and 2.4 mg of terpene lactones/tablet | YXY 0.08 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ⑩⑪ |
| 53/53 | 33/20 | 35/18 | 63.14 ± 8.38 | 64.73 ± 9.18 | Yangtze River | 19.2 mg of total flavonol glycosides and 4.8 mg of terpene lactones/tablet | YXY 1 tablet tid + CT | CT | 4 | ④⑤⑩ | |
| Xia and Zhang (2003) | 51/49 | 31/20 | 28/21 | 57 ± 6 | 56 ± 6 | NA | tablet | YXY 0.08 g tid + CT | CT | 8 | ①②③④⑤ |
| Huang (2016) | 100/100 | 61/39 | 57/43 | 54.55 ± 6.23 | 54.12 ± 6.83 | Qianhui | 0.025 g/drop pill | YXTZ 0.05 g tid + CT | CT | 8 | ③④⑤⑩ |
| Liu (2020) | 55/55 | 33/22 | 31/24 | 58.29 ± 5.02 | 58.12 ± 5.66 | Handian | Ginkgo biloba ester 0.008 g/drop pill | YXTZ 5 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 4 | ⑪ |
| Sheng et al. (2022) | 35/35 | 22/13 | 21/14 | 60.38 ± 5.37 | 58.92 ± 4.15 | Qianhui | Ginkgo biloba ester 0.005 g/drop pill | YXTZ 8 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①④⑤ |
| Li et al. (2019) | 49/49 | 30/19 | 28/21 | 58.91 ± 4.71 | 59.71 ± 6.52 | Qianhui | Ginkgo biloba ester 0.005 g/drop pill | YXTZ 8 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①②③④⑤⑧ |
| Wu (2014) | 34/34 | 15/19 | 16/18 | 58.4 ± 7.3 | 58.2 ± 7.1 | Handian | Ginkgo biloba ester 0.008 g/drop pill | YXTZ 0.05 g tid + CT | CT | 12 | ① |
| 60/60 | 34/26 | 37/23 | 63.7 ± 4.4 | 62.5 ± 4.1 | Qianhui | Ginkgo biloba ester 0.005 g/drop pill | YXTZ 8 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 2 | ②④⑤ | |
| Luo and Yu (2013) | 37/37 | 25/12 | 24/13 | 64.8 ± 7.2 | 65.2 ± 6.8 | Qianhui | Ginkgo biloba ester 0.005 g/drop pill | YXTZ 8 drop pills tid + CT | CT | 2 | ①⑥⑦⑧ |
| Liu et al. (2018b) | 63/63 | 70/56 | 62.36 ± 1.72 | NA | drop pill | YXTZ 8 drop pills tid+CT | CT | 1 | ⑥⑦⑧⑨⑩ | ||
| Peng et al. (2020) | 70/70 | 38/32 | 37/33 | 61.29 ± 4.59 | 61.43 ± 4.75 | Shenlong | 0.15 g/dispersible tablet | YXTZ 0.15 g tid + CT | CT | 8 | ④⑤ |
| Song (2021) | 42/42 | 23/19 | 22/20 | 63.12 ± 5.22 | 62.45 ± 5.17 | Shenlong | 0.15 g/dispersible tablet | YXTZ 0.15 g tid + CT | CT | 8 | ④⑤ |
| Li et al. (2003) | 64/64 | 44/20 | 46/18 | 62 ± 18 | 65 ± 19 | Meidakang | 0.005 g/tablet | XDK 0.4 g bid + CT | CT | 3 | ①②⑥⑦⑨ |
| Huang (2022) | 40/40 | 24/16 | 25/15 | 52.26 ± 2.25 | 52.31 ± 2.32 | Meidakang | capsule | XDK 2 capsules bid + CT | CT | 8 | ③④ |
| Huang (2018) | 53/53 | 23/30 | 30/23 | 63.0 ± 3.9 | 66.26 ± 3.1 | Yinkeruisi | 0.035 g/tablet | XDK 0.63 g bid+CT | CT | 8 | ①③④ |
| Zhang et al. (2012) | 61/60 | 41/20 | 39/21 | 63.4 ± 6.9 | 64.7 ± 7.2 | Taonan | Furosemide 0.015 g/capsule | XNST 4 capsules tid + CT | CT | 2 | ①⑩ |
| Ma et al. (2009) | 32/32 | 25/7 | 26/6 | 62.5 ± 5.0 | 63.0 ± 5.5 | Taonan | Furosemide 0.015 g/capsule | XNST 2 capsules tid + CT | CT | 24 | ③④⑤ |
| Wang (2015) | 45/48 | 60/33 | 65.78 ± 5.9 | Taonan | Furosemide 0.015 g/capsule | XNST 3 capsules tid + CT | CT | 1 | ① | ||
| Liu and Zhu (2019) | 67/67 | 39/28 | 37/30 | 67.9 ± 4.8 | 67.3 ± 4.3 | Kanion | 0.38 g/capsule | DZHJT 4 capsules tid + CT | CT | 8 | ①⑩ |
| Shen et al. (2014) | 46/46 | 26/20 | 27/19 | 58.2 ± 8.8 | 57.2 ± 8.1 | Kanion | 0.38 g/capsule | DZHJT 4 capsules tid + CT | CT | 8 | ②③④⑪ |
| Yue and Zhang (2013) | 30/30 | 16/14 | 18/12 | 61.93 ± 12.24 | 63.27 ± 13.16 | Xinbang | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 1.0 g tid + CT | CT | 12 | ①⑥⑦⑧ |
| 43/43 | 26/17 | 25/18 | 61.68 ± 3.09 | 61.52 ± 3.07 | Duoputai | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 1.0 g tid+CT | CT | 4 | ⑩ | |
| Luo (2013) | 56/56 | 32/24 | 32/24 | 61 | 63 | Xinbang | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 0.75 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ① |
| Li (2014) | 40/40 | 22/18 | 21/19 | 45–73 | 47–75 | Duoputai | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 1.0 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①⑪ |
| Wang et al. (2012) | 30/30 | 15/15 | 14/16 | 68.5 (46–78) | Duoputai | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 0.75 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①② | |
| Gao (2010) | 50/50 | 29/21 | 29/21 | NA | Duoputai | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 1.0 g tid + CT | CT | 4 | ①⑪ | |
| Xing and Lv (2015) | 53/52 | 35/18 | 32/20 | 62.5 ± 10.7 | 61.7 ± 10.4 | Duoputai | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 0.75 g tid + CT | CT | 8 | ④⑤⑪ |
| 44/42 | 25/19 | 24/18 | 56.03 ± 5.12 | 55.31 ± 5.05 | Xinbang | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 1.0 g tid + CT | CT | 8 | ②⑪ | |
| Hao (2022) | 50/49 | 28/22 | 26/23 | 63.65 ± 5.18 | 62.65 ± 5.46 | NA | 0.25 g/capsule | MXK 1.0 g tid + CT | CT | 12 | ② |
Characteristics of the included studies in this network meta-analysis.
Abbreviations: T, treatment group; C, control group; M, male; F, female; ZY, Zhenyuan oral preparation; XST, Xuesaitong oral preparation; XY, Xinyue oral preparation; DAXXK, diaoxinxuekang oral preparation; XZK, Xuezhikang oral preparation; YXY, yinxingye oral preparation; YXTZ, Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation; XDK, xindakang oral preparation; XNST, Xinnaoshutong oral preparation; DZHJT, dazhuhongjingtian oral preparation; MXK, Maixuekang oral preparation; CT, conventional treatment; NA, Not Available. ①Angina efficacy; ②Electrocardiogram (ECG) efficacy; ③Nitroglycerin dosages; ④Frequency of angina; ⑤Duration of angina (min/times); ⑥Total cholesterol (TC); ⑦Triglyceride (TG); ⑧Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C); ⑨High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C); ⑩high-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hs-CRP); ⑪Plasma viscosity (PV); ⑫Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).
3.2 Risk of bias assessment of included studies
The 72 studies were assessed for risk of bias, and the results are detailed in Figure 2 and Supplementary Material S3. 1) random sequence generation (selection bias): 36 studies reported specific methods of generating random sequences, of which 30 studies used random number tables for random assignment (; ; ; ; ; Fan and Zhang, 2023; Gao and Gao, 2013; Huang and Zhang, 2023; Huang, 2022; Liu et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2008; Liu, 2020; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Liu and Zhu, 2019; Lu, 2022; Ma et al., 2009; Ma and Deng, 2019; Peng et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2022; Song, 2021; Su et al., 2017; Wang and Sun, 2012; Wang, 2022; Xiong et al., 2008; Xu and Fang, 2019; Xu, 2020; Xu, 2016; Yu and Yang, 2023; Yu et al., 2023; Zhang R. et al., 2020), two studies used computers for random assignment (; Wang et al., 2017), one study used lottery for random assignment (Huang, 2018), one study used the PROC PLAN procedure of the SAS (Statistical Analysis System) for random assignment (), one study used stratified randomization for random assignment (Wu, 2014), and one study used coin flipping for random assignment (Hao, 2022), therefore, the risk of selection bias in the above studies was rated as “low risk”; the remaining 36 studies mentioned randomization without specifying the method, so they were rated as “unclear risk”. 2) allocation concealment (selection bias): three studies reported the use of SNOSE (sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes) for allocation concealment, which was rated as “low risk” (; ; Liu et al., 2008); The remaining studies did not mention allocation concealment programs, and were rated as “unclear risk”. 3) blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias): two studies were single-blind (Kuang et al., 2011; Wei, 2010) and two studies were double-blind (; ), which were considered “low risk”. The remaining studies did not mention information on blinding, were rated as “unclear risk”. 4) blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): None of the studies reported blinding of outcome assessors, so all were rated as “unclear risk”. 5) Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias): four studies (; ; Ma and Deng, 2019; Wang et al., 2017) were rated as “high risk” for incomplete outcome data, while the remaining studies with no incomplete outcome data were rated as “low risk”. 6) selective reporting (reporting bias): two studies (Lin et al., 2009; Liu Q. et al., 2018) had selective reporting resulting in incomplete outcome data and were rated as “high risk”; The remaining studies reported the expected outcome measures according to the experimental protocol and were rated as “low risk”. 7) Other bias: No other significant biases were identified, so all studies were rated “low risk” for other bias.
FIGURE 2
3.3 Results of the network meta-analysis
3.3.1 Primary outcome measures
3.3.1.1 Angina efficacy
A total of 44 studies (; ; ; ; Fan and Zhang, 2023; Feng et al., 2009; Gao, 2010; Gao and Gao, 2013; Ge and Zhao, 2010; He, 2014; Huang and Zhang, 2023; Huang, 2018; Jia, 2014; Kuang et al., 2011; Li, 2014; Li et al., 2003; Li et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2009; Liu, 2015; Liu et al., 2008; Liu Q. et al., 2018; Liu and Zhu, 2019; Luo and Yu, 2013; Luo, 2013; Ren and Peng, 2006; Sheng et al., 2022; Su et al., 2017; Wang and Sun, 2012; Wang, 2015; Wang, 2022; Wang et al., 2012; Wei, 2010; Wu, 2014; Xia and Zhang, 2003; Xu and Fang, 2019; Xu, 2020; Xu, 2016; Yu, 2010; Yu et al., 2023; Yue and Zhang, 2013; Zhang et al., 2011; Zhang R. et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2012; Zhu and Li, 2008) reported angina efficacy involving 11 SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3A. Figure 4A showed that 10 SSTCM-OPs + CT were more effective than CT alone (p < 0.05), including: MXK + CT (RR = 1.30, CI: 1.18, 1.44), XY + CT (RR = 1.30, CI: 1.12, 1.51), XDK + CT (RR = 1.26, CI: 1.11, 1.43), XZK + CT (RR = 1.22, CI: 1.13, 1.31), DAXXK + CT (RR = 1.21, CI: 1.11, 1.32), YXTZ + CT (RR = 1.20, CI: 1.09, 1.32), ZY + CT (RR = 1.18, CI: 1.06, 1.32), DZHJT + CT (RR = 1.18, CI: 1.01, 1.38), XST + CT (RR = 1.18, CI: 1.12, 1.24), YXY + CT (RR = 1.14, CI: 1.08, 1.20). According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, MXK + CT (86.6%) was the best treatment, followed by XY + CT (82.1%), XDK + CT (72.5%), XZK + CT (61.3%), DAXXK + CT (59.1%), YXTZ + CT (55.1%), ZY + CT (47.9%), DZHJT + CT (47.7%), XST + CT (46%), YXY + CT (30.2%), XNST + CT (8.2%) in Figure 5A and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as moderate to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
3.3.1.2 ECG efficacy
A total of 21 studies (; ; ; Feng et al., 2009; Ge and Zhao, 2010; Hao, 2022; He, 2014; Jia, 2014; Li et al., 2003; Li et al., 2019; Liu Q. et al., 2018; Ren and Peng, 2006; Shen et al., 2014; Wang and Sun, 2012; Wang, 2022; Wang et al., 2012; Wei, 2010; Xia and Zhang, 2003; Xu and Fang, 2019; Yu, 2010; Zhang et al., 2011) reported the ECG efficacy involving nine SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3B. According to Figure 4B, the NMA results showed that the ECG efficacy of the included 9 SSTCM-OPs + CT was superior to that of single used CT alone (p < 0.05), including: XDK + CT (RR = 1.87, CI: 1.44, 2.44), YXTZ + CT (RR = 1.41, CI: 1.19, 1.67), XZK+CT (RR = 1.28, CI: 1.03, 1.60), ZY + CT (RR = 1.24, CI: 1.05, 1.47), XST + CT (RR = 1.24 CI: 1.10, 1.40), YXY + CT (RR = 1.20, CI: 1.10, 1.31), DZHJT + CT (RR = 1.19, CI: 1.01, 1.42), MXK + CT (RR = 1.19, CI: 1.05, 1.34), DAXXK + CT (RR = 1.16, CI: 1.02, 1.33). In addition, according to the results of the NMA, XDK + CT was more advantageous in improving ECG efficacy as it was statistically significant when compared to all other interventions (p < 0.05) except YXTZ + CT in Figure 4B. Similarly, the results of the SUCRA ranking suggest that XDK + CT (99.3%) was the best treatment, followed by YXTZ + CT (81.3%), XZK + CT (60.7%), ZY + CT (52.6%), XST + CT (52.6%), YXY + CT (41.3%), DZHJT + CT (40.7%), MXK + CT (38%), DAXXK + CT (33%) in Figure 5B and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as moderate to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2 Secondary outcome measures
3.3.2.1 Nitroglycerin dosages
A total of 12 studies (Gao and Gao, 2013; Huang and Zhang, 2023; Huang, 2016; Huang, 2022; Huang, 2018; Li et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2009; Shen et al., 2014; Xia and Zhang, 2003; Yu et al., 2023; Zhang R. et al., 2020; Zhao, 2002) reported the nitroglycerin dosages involving 8 SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3C. Figure 4C showed that only 1 SSTCM-OP combined with CT reduced nitroglycerin dosages compared to single used CT (p < 0.05), which was XDK + CT (SMD = −3.73, CI: −5.98, −1.48). According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, XDK + CT (92.3%) was the best treatment, followed by YXTZ + CT (66.6%), DZHJT + CT (61%), DAXXK + CT (54.5%), XY + CT (47.9%), XST + CT (42.2%), YXY + CT (37.6%), XNST + CT (28.6%) in Figure 5C and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.2 Frequency of angina
A total of 26 studies (; ; ; ; Gao and Gao, 2013; Huang and Zhang, 2023; Huang, 2016; Huang, 2022; Huang, 2018; Kuang et al., 2011; Lu, 2022; Ma et al., 2009; Ma and Deng, 2019; Peng et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2014; Sheng et al., 2022; Song, 2021; Sun et al., 2024; Wang, 2022; Wei, 2010; Xia and Zhang, 2003; Xing and Lv, 2015; Xu, 2016; Xu and Fang, 2019; Yu et al., 2023; Zhang R. et al., 2020) reported the frequency of angina involving 11 SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3D. Figure 4D showed that 5 SSTCM-OPs + CT reduced the number of angina episodes compared to CT (p < 0.05), including: ZY + CT (SMD = −5.43, CI: −8.42, −2.44), DAXXK + CT (SMD = −3.18, CI: −4.86, −1.50), YXTZ + CT (SMD = −2.31, CI: −3.49, −1.13), XDK + CT (SMD = −2.30, CI: −4.34, −0.27), XST + CT (SMD = −1.62, CI: −3.06, −0.19). However, XNST + CT (SMD = 0.09, CI: −2.79, 2.96) did not reduce the frequency of angina, and more large-sample RCTs are needed for data correction. According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, ZY + CT (96.9%) was the best treatment, followed by DAXXK + CT (79.7%), MXK + CT (67.9%), YXTZ + CT (64.4%), XDK + CT (62.7%), XST + CT (47.5%), XY + CT (39.1%), YXY + CT (38.6%), DZHJT + CT (38.1%), XZK + CT (36.5%), XNST + CT (17.5%) in Figure 5D and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as low to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.3 Duration of angina
A total of 22 studies (; ; ; Huang and Zhang, 2023; Huang, 2016; Kuang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2019; Lu, 2022; Ma et al., 2009; Ma and Deng, 2019; Peng et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2022; Song, 2021; Sun et al., 2024; Wang, 2022; Wei, 2010; Xia and Zhang, 2003; Xing and Lv, 2015; Xu and Fang, 2019; Xu, 2016; Yu et al., 2023; Zhang R. et al., 2020) involving 9 SSTCM-OPs with an improvement in duration of angina were reported. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3E. According to Figure 4E, the results of the NMA showed that 3 SSTCM-OPs + CT reduced the duration of angina compared to CT (p < 0.05), including: XNST + CT (MD = −4.60, CI: −8.10, −1.10), YXTZ + CT (MD = −3.59, CI: −5.03, −2.16), DAXXK + + CT (MD = −2.47, CI: −4.47, −0.48). The remaining 6 SSTCM-OPs showed no statistically significant improvement in the duration of angina. The results of the SUCRA ranking suggested that XNST + CT (86.2%) was the best treatment, followed by YXTZ + CT (79.2%), MXK + CT (60.1%), DAXXK + CT (56.4%), XY + CT (56.3%), ZY + CT (48.5%), XST + CT (38%), XZK + CT (35%), YXY + CT (34.4%) in Figure 5E and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as low to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.4 TC
A total of 18 studies (; ; ; ; ; ; Li et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2008; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Luo and Yu, 2013; Ma and Deng, 2019; Ma et al., 2014; Su et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Xiong et al., 2008; Yue and Zhang, 2013; Zhu and Li, 2008) reported changes in TC levels involving 5 SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3F. For TC levels, Figure 4F showed that 3 SSTCM-OPs + CT had the ability in cutting down TC levels compared to CT (p < 0.05), including: XZK + CT (MD = −0.90, CI: −1.22, −0.57), YXTZ + CT (MD = −−0.90, CI: −1.61, −0.18), XST + CT (MD = −0.63, CI: −1.16, −0.10), and the results suggested that XZK + CT vs. YXTZ + CT (MD = 0.00, CI: −0.78, 0.78), both of which were comparable in their ability to cut down TC levels. According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, XZK + CT (91.6%) was the best treatment to cut down TC levels, followed by YXTZ + CT (71.8%), XST + CT (52.1%), MXK + CT (49.8%), and XDK + CT (45.1%) in Figure 5F and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as low to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.5 TG
A total of 18 studies (; ; ; ; ; ; Liu et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2008; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Luo and Yu, 2013; Ma and Deng, 2019; Ma et al., 2014; Su et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Xiong et al., 2008; Yue and Zhang, 2013; Zhang R. et al., 2020; Zhu and Li, 2008) reported changes in TG levels involving 5 SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3G. For TG levels, Figure 4G showed that 3 SSTCM-OPs + CT had the ability in cutting down TG levels compared to CT (p < 0.05), including: YXTZ + CT (MD = −0.48, CI: −0.76, −0.20), MXK + CT (MD = −0.45, CI: −0.83, −0.07), XZK + CT (MD = −0.41, CI: −0.54, −0.28). According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, YXTZ + CT (82.2%) was the best treatment to cut down TG levels, followed by MXK + CT (75.1%), XZK + CT (72.5%), XST + CT (34%), and XDK + CT (27.3%) in Figure 5G and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as low to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.6 LDL-C
A total of 20 studies (; ; ; ; ; ; Li et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2008; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Luo and Yu, 2013; Ma and Deng, 2019; Ma et al., 2014; Su et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2006; Xiong et al., 2008; Yue and Zhang, 2013; Zhu and Li, 2008) reported changes in LDL-C levels involving 4 SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3H. For LDL-C levels, Figure 4H showed that 3 SSTCM-OPs + CT had a therapeutic effect in cutting down LDL-C levels compared to CT (p < 0.05), including: XZK + CT (MD = −0.82, CI: 1.12, −0.53), YXTZ + CT (MD = −0.63, CI: −1.20, −0.06), XST + CT (MD = −0.55, CI: −1.06, −0.04). According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, XZK + CT (76.8%) was the best treatment in reducing LDL-C levels, followed by MXK + CT (67.9%), YXTZ + CT (55.8%), and XST + CT (47.3%) in Figure 5H and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.7 HDL-C
A total of 14 studies (; ; ; ; ; Liu et al., 2008; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Ma and Deng, 2019; Ma et al., 2014; Su et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2006; Xiong et al., 2008; Zhu and Li, 2008) reported changes in HDL-C levels involving 4 SSTCM-OPs. The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3I. For HDL-C levels, Figure 4I showed that only XZK + CT (MD = 0.41, CI: 0.28, 0.54) improved HDL-C levels compared to CT (p < 0.05). The remaining three SSTCM-OPs had the possibility of improving HDL-C, but the difference was not significant. According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, XZK + CT (92.5%) was the best treatment in improving HDL-C levels, followed by XDK + CT (59.1%), XST + CT (47.8%), YXTZ + CT (40.2%) in Figure 5I and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.8 hs-CRP
A total of 15 studies (; ; ; ; Fan and Zhang, 2023; Huang, 2016; Liu et al., 2013; Liu Q. et al., 2018; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Liu and Zhu, 2019; Wang, 2022; Xiong et al., 2008; Yu and Yang, 2023; Yu et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2012) reported hs-CRP improvement involving 9 SSTCM-OPs. The plots of the evidence network are shown in Figure 3J. According to Figure 4J, the NMA results showed that 3 SSTCM-OPs + CT significantly reduced hs-CRP levels compared to CT (P < 0.05), including: XST + CT (MD = −4.36, CI: −6.93, −1.79), YXY + CT (MD = −3.63, CI: −5.51, −1.75), XZK + CT (MD = −2.74, CI: −4.27, −1.20). The remaining six SSTCM-OPs offered the possibility of reducing hs-CRP, but the difference was not significant. According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, XST + CT (91.6%) was the best treatment for reducing hs-CRP to improve coronary inflammation, followed by YXY + CT (84.7%), XZK + CT (69.8%), YXTZ + CT (47%), MXK + CT (43.7%), DAXXK + CT (41.5%), XNST + CT (38.9%), DZHJT + CT (38.3%), ZY + CT (35.9%) in Figure 5J and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as moderate to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.9 PV
A total of 10 studies (; Feng et al., 2009; Gao, 2010; Li, 2014; Liu, 2020; Shen et al., 2014; Xing and Lv, 2015; Xu, 2020; Xu, 2016; Yu and Yang, 2023) involving six SSTCM-OPs with a change in PV were reported. The plots of the evidence network are shown in Figure 3K. Figure 4K showed that 4 SSTCM-OPs + CT made a change in PV compared to single used CT (p < 0.05), including: YXTZ + CT (MD = −1.28, CI: −1.68, −0.88), DAXXK + CT (MD = −0.69, CI: −0.88, −0.49), DZHJT + CT (MD = −0.41, CI: −0.67, −0.15), MXK + CT (MD = −0.23, CI: −0.37, −0.08). At the same time, YXTZ + CT was statistically different compared to all other 5 SSTCM-OPs in reducing PV levels (p < 0.05). The results of the SUCRA ranking demonstrated that YXTZ + CT (99.9%) was the best treatment, followed by DAXXK + CT (82.6%), DZHJT + CT (64.4%), MXK + CT (46.8%), YXY + CT (29.6%), and XST + CT (16.2%) in Figure 5K and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as moderate to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.2.10 MACEs
A total of seven studies reported the incidence of MACEs involving two SSTCM-OPs, XST + CT (; Yu, 2010; Zhao, 2002) and XZK + CT (; ; Lin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013). The evidence plots are shown in Figure 3L. Figure 4L showed that XZK + CT (RR = 0.25, CI: 0.12, 0.49) was statistically significant in reducing the incidence of MACEs compared to CT (p < 0.05). According to the results of the SUCRA ranking, XZK + CT (97.6%) was a recommended intervention in clinical practice to reduce the incidence of MACEs, followed by XST + CT (42.4%) in Figure 5L and Supplementary Material S4. The certainty of this evidence was assessed as moderate to very low overall, with details provided in Supplementary Material S3.
3.3.3 Cluster analysis
Cluster analysis was established by dividing the angina efficacy with the ECG efficacy, the frequency of angina, the duration of angina, and the nitroglycerin dosages, respectively. The different levels of intervention were delineated by different colors. According to Figures 6A,B, the best effects in terms of improvement of the angina efficacy and the ECG efficacy were obtained with XDK + CT, and the same results were observed in improving angina efficacy and the nitroglycerin dosages as variables. Figures 6C,D revealed that no interventions were distributed in the upper right corner for the combinations of angina efficacy vs. duration of angina, and angina efficacy vs. frequency of angina. However, we recommend MXK+CT as a clinically valuable intervention, since the SUCRA values for MXK + CT exceeded 60% for all three outcome indicators.
FIGURE 6
3.3.4 Adverse reactions
A total of 33 studies reported the occurrence of adverse reactions, of which 13 studies (; Gao, 2010; Huang, 2018; Kuang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2003; Li et al., 2019; Luo and Yu, 2013; Luo, 2013; Ma and Deng, 2019; Wang, 2015; Wang et al., 2012; Yue and Zhang, 2013; Zhang et al., 2012) did not observe any significant adverse reactions and 20 studies (; ; Fan and Zhang, 2023; Hao, 2022; Huang, 2022; Liu et al., 2013; Liu, 2020; Liu Y. et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2014; Peng et al., 2020; Sheng et al., 2022; Song, 2021; Su et al., 2017; Wang, 2022; Xu and Fang, 2019; Yu, 2010; Yu and Yang, 2023; Zhang R. et al., 2020; Zhao, 2002; Zhu and Li, 2008) reported adverse reactions during treatment. These adverse reactions included dizziness, headache, flushing, gastrointestinal distress, stomach upset, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, rash, subcutaneous hemorrhage, gingival bleeding, bleeding, fatigue, tachycardia, hypotension, and abnormalities in liver function. Due to substantial heterogeneity in adverse reaction reporting criteria across studies, quantitative meta-analysis of safety outcomes was not feasible; thus, only descriptive summaries were provided. The incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group was 97/1754 (5.53%) compared to 76/1749 (4.35%) in the control group in Supplementary Material S5.
3.4 Sensitivity analysis
Although the majority of included studies utilized capsule formulations, heterogeneity in dosage forms (e.g., tablets, drop pills) was observed, which may introduce confounding variables, thereby limiting the generalizability of the study findings. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted on the primary outcomes to strengthen the credibility of these results, with details in Supplementary Material S3. This study confirmed the robustness of capsule formulations in improving both angina efficacy and ECG efficacy, with consistent results across different analytical approaches.
3.5 Subgroup analysis
Subgroup analyses were performed according to treatment courses (≤4 weeks versus >4 weeks) to evaluate both angina efficacy and ECG efficacy. Heterogeneity was detected across these subgroups, with results indicating that intervention duration might serve as a source of heterogeneity, as detailed in Supplementary Material S3. This suggests that the length of treatment may affect outcome consistency in this NMA, highlighting the importance of considering treatment course stratification in clinical applications.
3.6 Meta-regression analysis
The meta-regression analysis identified no significant association between XZK + CT treatment course (4–48 weeks) and LDL-C reduction (β = 0.098, CI: −0.701, 0.879) in Supplementary Material S3. We calculated the central value (18 weeks), which served as a mathematical midpoint to anchor regression estimation. The reference effect at the 18-week reference point showed no significant variation across treatment courses. These findings suggest that it does not significantly contribute to between-study heterogeneity, which is predominantly influenced by non-time-related factors.
3.7 Publication bias
Figures 7A–L shows the results of the publication bias assessment, where points of different colors represent different direct comparisons between interventions. Publication bias was assessed across 12 outcomes using comparison-adjusted funnel plots. The results showed that the comparison-adjusted funnel plots for angina efficacy, ECG efficacy, hs-CRP, PV, TG, HDL-C, and MACEs showed acceptable symmetry, suggesting that a small-study effect was less likely. The comparison-adjusted funnel plots for frequency of angina, duration of angina, nitroglycerin dosages, TC, and LDL-C showed poor symmetry, suggesting that publication bias may exist. The observed publication bias may be attributed to quality differences, small sample size, dose, and dosage form, therefore, more homogeneous and large-sample studies are needed.
FIGURE 7
4 Discussion
4.1 Clinical significance
This study included 72 studies involving 7,360 participants, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of 11 SSTCM-OPs in patients with UAP. We evaluated a total of 12 outcomes across three categories: 1) angina-related efficacy, including angina efficacy, ECG efficacy, nitroglycerin dosages, frequency of angina, and duration of angina; 2) blood lipid levels, covering TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C; 3) other outcomes, including hs-CRP, PV, and MACEs.
4.1.1 Angina-related efficacy
According to the research findings, MXK + CT was the most effective in improving angina efficacy and also ranked among the top three in terms of duration of angina and frequency of angina. Hirudin, the main metabolite of MXK, is a natural thrombin-specific inhibitor. It has been shown to promote angiogenesis, reduce thrombosis, and ameliorate hypoxia-induced damage to cardiac microvascular endothelial cells (Fan et al., 1992; Guo et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2024b). Studies (Wang J. et al., 2023; Zhang H. et al., 2020) have shown that hirudin exerts its cardioprotective effects and slows atherosclerosis progression through lipid modulation and induction of apoptosis in abnormally proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells. Although hirudinidae-based preparations exhibit minimal toxicity at standard therapeutic dosages, adverse reactions, including allergic reactions and hemorrhagic tendencies, were observed in long-term users (Yang et al., 2024).
XDK + CT and YXTZ + CT were ranked as the top two interventions in terms of improving ECG efficacy and reducing nitroglycerin dosages, representing the most reliable methods for objectively evaluating the improvement of angina. Furthermore, YXTZ + CT ranked second in terms of improving the duration of angina, while XDK + CT performed well in improving the angina efficacy. Previous studies have shown that XDK can reduce myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by improving the energy metabolism of ATP in ischemic cardiomyocytes, and has a certain effect on antiplatelet aggregation (; Zeng et al., 2013). Current studies have demonstrated a favorable safety profile of its source botanical drug (Hippophae rhamnoides L.); however, limited evidence exists on its synergistic effects or interactions with conventional cardiovascular drugs (). Modern pharmacological research reveals that YXTZ (alias: Ginkgo biloba extract 50, GBE50), besides inhibiting myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury and anti-arrhythmic effects (Liu et al., 2021; Wang X. et al., 2023), also improves hemodynamics, thereby reducing myocardial pathological damage (Jiang et al., 2017; Li et al., 2013).
ZY + CT demonstrated the most significant effect in reducing the frequency of angina. However, given the limited number of studies included in the analysis, these findings should be interpreted with caution. ZY refers to a class of saponins extracted from the fruits of Panax ginseng C.A.Mey., a traditional medicinal botanical drug, with major plant-derived metabolites including ginsenosides such as Rg1 and Re (Xie et al., 2009). Based on the principles of TCM, Panax ginseng is believed to invigorate Qi, promote blood circulation, calm the mind, and stabilize the heart. As a commonly prescribed herbal remedy, it has been widely used in the treatment of chest stuffiness and pains, palpitations, chest tightness, fatigue, and neurasthenia, thereby underpinning its therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular diseases (Jia et al., 2023; Xiang et al., 2008).
XNST + CT was ranked as the most effective in improving the duration of angina. Xinnaoshutong capsule is derived from Tribulus terrestris L. through the extraction of gross saponins, commonly known as Gross Saponins of Tribulus Terrestris (GSTT) (Zhang et al., 2010). Modern studies (Guo et al., 2006; Shi et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010) have highlighted the cardioprotective effects of GSTT, including its ability to mitigate atherosclerosis, reduce cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and counteract ventricular remodeling. These effects likely contribute to the therapeutic potential of Xinnaoshutong capsule in improving heart function and alleviating ischemic-related symptoms. Current research on its cardiovascular mechanisms and drug-drug interactions remains limited. Furthermore, the herbal toxicity profiles of XNST are yet unclear (Ștefănescu et al., 2020). Thus, studies on correlations, pharmacokinetics of key metabolites, and pharmacodynamic interactions are urgently needed to inform clinical safety and efficacy.
Integrated with the cluster analysis results illustrated in Figures 6A–D, MXK + CT performed better in improving the angina efficacy and the duration of angina, the angina efficacy and the frequency of angina, making it one of the most clinically recommended interventions. XDK + CT, YXTZ + CT, ZY + CT, and XNST + CT exhibited favorable performance in the corresponding aspects, providing clinical physicians with viable options for decision-making in relevant clinical scenarios.
4.1.2 Blood lipid levels
XZK + CT ranked first in improving TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C levels, and although it ranked third in TG reduction, it showed no clinically significant differences compared to YXTZ + CT (MD = 0.07, CI: −0.24, 0.38) and MXK + CT (MD = 0.04, CI: −0.36, 0.44), thus supporting its role in comprehensive lipid management. However, the results of this NMA suggest that it ranks relatively low in terms of efficacy in improving angina-related outcomes. XZK is primarily derived from special fermented red yeast, which is abundant in bioactive metabolites like hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (Wang et al., 2015). Its lipid-regulating effect can reach the level of medium-strength statin drugs, while maintaining a relatively high safety profile (Li et al., 2021). According to research statistics, the adverse reactions of red yeast rice preparations mainly involve general disorders and administration site reactions, gastrointestinal disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and adverse events related to medical examinations or laboratory indicators (Raschi et al., 2018).
The results of this study demonstrated that YXTZ + CT was equally efficacious in improving blood lipid levels as it was in improving angina-related outcomes. Specifically, it ranked first in reducing TG levels and second in lowering TC levels. Studies (; Gu et al., 2009) show that YXTZ’s reduction in TC and TG levels is associated with modulation of the expression levels of lipid metabolism-related genes.
MXK + CT also exhibited superiority in improving blood lipid levels, and it ranked second in improving TG and LDL-C levels. Significantly, MXK + CT showed clinically insignificant differences compared to XZK + CT (MD = 0.01, CI: −1.01, 1.04) in terms of LDL-C levels. Modern research has demonstrated that MXK protects the vascular endothelium and inhibits the occurrence and development of atherosclerosis through multiple mechanisms. These include regulating lipid metabolism, reducing the level of serum ox-LDL, correcting the disorder of NO metabolism, and downregulating the expression of specific receptors such as LOX-1 and ICA-1 (Gao et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014). As is evident from this NMA, both YXTZ + CT and MXK + CT demonstrate remarkable performance in improving angina-related curative effects.
Current guidelines highlight LDL-C as the primary therapeutic target for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction, while TG serve as a management indicator in high-risk ASCVD patients who have achieved LDL-C goals (Mach et al., 2020; Wang Z. et al., 2023). Based on the findings of this NMA, lipid intervention targets, and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Scale (CCS) grades (; Kaul et al., 2009), several potential treatment approaches can be considered: 1) For UAP patients (CCS ≤ II) with predominant LDL-C elevation or mixed hyperlipidemia, XZK + CT may be a potential option. 2) For UAP patients (CCS ≥ III) with predominant LDL-C elevation or mixed hyperlipidemia, MXK + CT may be worth exploring. 3) For UAP patients (CCS ≤ II) with hypertriglyceridemia, XZK + CT appears to be a viable choice. 4) For UAP patients (CCS ≥ III) with hypertriglyceridemia, YXTZ + CT or MXK + CT could be considered. However, these approaches should be further investigated in future clinical trials to determine their actual efficacy and safety.
4.1.3 Other outcomes
In terms of improving PV, YXTZ + CT was ranked first according to the SUCRA value. Studies (; Wang et al., 2013) show that GBE50 is able to improve the blood rheological indexes of rats with blood stasis syndrome, and compared with the normal and model groups, GBE50 significantly reduced whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and erythrocyte aggregation index (P < 0.05), and the overall intervention effect is better than that of Ginaton, a representative drug of YXY.
In terms of improving hs-CRP, XST + CT was ranked first, while XZK + CT also demonstrated significant efficacy, securing third place in the cumulative ranking analysis. Meanwhile, XZK + CT was more effective in improving LDL-C levels and preventing MACEs compared with XST + CT. The reduction of LDL-C by XZK plays a role in preventing recurrent cardiovascular events, as supported by evidence linking aggressive LDL-C lowering to decreased MACE incidence (Vallejo-Vaz et al., 2018). Notably, studies have shown that despite standard treatment for acute coronary syndrome or other cardiovascular diseases, some patients remain in a persistent low-grade inflammatory state, indicating a potential risk for recurrent cardiovascular events, referred to as residual inflammatory risk (Klingenberg et al., 2021; Pradhan et al., 2018; Ridker, 2016). Although inflammatory markers (e.g., hs-CRP, IL-6, Interleukin-1β) remain elevated after treatment, indicating residual inflammation (Ridker et al., 2023); (Rothman et al., 2020). In addition to directly reducing hs-CRP levels, the statin component of XZK inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, TNF-α) (Oesterle et al., 2017). Thus, the superior reduction in MACEs observed with XZK + CT may stem from its dual capacity to mitigate both residual cholesterol risk and residual inflammatory risk, whereas XST + CT, despite ranking first in hs-CRP improvement, demonstrates limited efficacy in addressing lipid-driven pathways—a distinction that underscores the potential advantage of comprehensive risk modulation.
However, the small sample size and limited MACE-focused studies may compromise result stability and generalizability. Future research should include larger, more diverse samples and well-designed RCTs, thereby providing more comprehensive evidence for the prevention and management of MACEs.
4.2 Efficacy of SSTCM-OPs: impact of drug source and preparation process
ZY, XST, and XY are pharmaceutical preparations derived from P. ginseng C.A.Mey., Panax notoginseng (Burkill) F.H.Chen, and Panax quinquefolius L., respectively, all belonging to the Araliaceae family in Table 1. A key distinguishing factor between ginseng species is the presence of specific ginsenosides (Kim, 2012). Ginsenoside Rf is found in both P. ginseng C.A.Mey. and P. notoginseng (Burkill) F.H.Chen, while pseudoginsenoside F11 is exclusive to P. quinquefolius L. (). Notoginsenoside R1 is characteristic of both P. ginseng C.A.Mey. and P. notoginseng (Burkill) F.H.Chen. Additionally, the Rg1/Rb1 ratio is commonly used for differentiation, with values below 0.4 indicating P. quinquefolius L. and higher ratios typical of P. ginseng C.A.Mey. and P. notoginseng (Burkill) F.H.Chen (Yuan et al., 2010). While the efficacy of these three SSTCM-OPs treatments for patients with UAP is generally consistent, notable differences also exist. The observed results may be attributed to the shared profile of secondary metabolites, particularly ginsenosides, among these species, despite variations in their specific subtypes and concentrations (Kim, 2012; Yue et al., 2021). However, the precise mechanisms by which these secondary metabolites mediate cardiovascular effects remain elusive.
Importantly, studies (Liu et al., 2019; Xie and Wang, 2023) reveal that the bioactive saponins of XST, Panax notoginseng saponins (PNSs) show dual regulatory properties in balancing antiplatelet aggregation and pro-coagulant activities: First, PNSs interact synergistically with aspirin and clopidogrel by downregulating the platelet AA/COX/TXB2 pathway and suppressing clopidogrel resistance-related gene expression, thereby significantly enhancing their antiplatelet efficacy; Second, PNSs improve the outcomes of antithrombotic therapy by reducing the side effects associated with gastric mucosal damage. However, it is worth focusing on the possible side effects of consuming ginseng (including P. ginseng C.A.Mey. and P. notoginseng (Burkill) F.H.Chen) products in subjects taking cardiac, antidepressant, and anti-bleeding medications (Mancuso and Santangelo, 2017). Therefore, rigorous monitoring of bleeding risk and anxiety status is essential during the clinical administration of ZY and XY.
In addition, the performance of two Ginkgo biloba extracts (GBEs), YXY and YXTZ, in the treatment of unstable angina patients in this study revealed the influence of different botanical drug preparation processes on drug efficacy. The two main types of Ginkgo biloba oral preparations in China are: Yinxingye and Yinxingtongzhi oral preparations (). Our research findings revealed that, with the exception of the effect on improving hs-CRP (MD = 1.94, CI: −0.70, 4.58), YXTZ demonstrated superiority over YXY in angina efficacy, ECG efficacy, nitroglycerin dosages, frequency of angina, duration of angina, and PV. The details are in Figure 4. The above results can be attributed to the fact that, in comparison with other Ginkgo biloba preparations, YXTZ has enhanced the content of pharmacologically active metabolites and reduced that of allergenic substances (Qian et al., 2021). Specifically, the quality control index of Ginkgo biloba oral preparations is higher than 24% of total flavonol glycosides and ginkgolide reaches more than 6%, while the requirement of Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation is stricter; its total flavonol glycosides content reaches more than 44%, and the main toxic metabolites of these two GBEs—ginkgolic acid is controlled below 5 μg/g (; Liu et al., 2021). Their main adverse reactions caused by ginkgolic acid are digestive system symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), headaches and dizziness, pallor, anxiety, weakness, or skin allergy (; Shao et al., 2025). The combination of GBEs with aspirin, warfarin, and omeprazole may potentially induce drug-drug interactions, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear (Mei et al., 2017). Furthermore, in patients taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications, the concurrent use of GBEs may elevate the risk of bleeding events (; Mei et al., 2017).
4.3 Achievements and the path forward
Angina pectoris poses a substantial public health challenge, not only due to its association with elevated mortality risk but also through its detrimental effects on quality of life, including psychological distress and activity limitations. Within this context, SSTCM-OPs represent a complementary medical approach that enriches the therapeutic toolkit for angina management. By providing additional treatment options, SSTCM-OPs can be integrated with conventional medical approaches, potentially enhancing the overall management of patients (Hao et al., 2017). This integration may lead to better patient outcomes, such as improved quality of life, reduced reliance on certain medications, and enhanced cardiovascular function, thereby further validating the value and potential of complementary and alternative medicine in modern healthcare (Lin et al., 2024).
As modern medicine evolves and TCM research deepens, an increasing number of traditional Chinese medicine extracts have successfully obtained market approval after rigorous experimental and clinical studies, demonstrating the positive achievements of the modernization of TCM (Wu et al., 2023; Xiong et al., 2022). However, current clinical research of TCM in the field of cardiovascular diseases still has limitations (). In the included primary studies, the lack of standardized terminology led to non-uniform reporting of adverse reactions. For example, some studies (Liu et al., 2013; Peng et al., 2020) grouped “headache” and “dizziness” into a combined term, while others reported them as distinct symptoms. Moreover, only a small number of studies have provided standardized reports on allergic reactions, dose-dependent responses, liver function, renal function, and other relevant factors. This is a matter that requires our vigilance. Standardized safety reporting is critical in treatment, directly influencing clinicians’ medication choices, thereby necessitating the establishment of a standardized safety reporting system in TCM and the integration of comprehensive safety metrics in future research.
At present, no objective and systematic framework exists to elucidate TCM mechanisms in the prevention and treatment of CHD (Wang and He, 2010). Integrated metabolomics offers a more comprehensive approach to understanding the effects of TCM and could facilitate the establishment of such a system (Wu et al., 2019). Therefore, additional high-quality clinical studies are essential to enhance the evaluation framework and refine its components. Meanwhile, current traditional cell culture and animal models have limitations in reflecting human physiology, leading to significant discrepancies in results. Cardiac organ chips are increasingly gaining attention, providing substantial benefits in disease modeling, drug screening, personalized medicine, and education and training (Li et al., 2024). We suggest integrating this technology into modern TCM research frameworks to evaluate multi-component synergistic effects and potential toxicity, thereby addressing critical gaps in TCM safety and efficacy assessment.
Publication bias is a critical concern in meta-analyses, as it may distort the interpretation of intervention effects by favoring the publication of statistically significant or positive results, particularly small-study effect. The observed bias may have implications for clinical decision-making. For instance, LDL-C is a key biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment, and biased estimates of treatment effects on these outcomes may mislead clinical guideline recommendations. In contrast, symmetric funnel plots suggested low risk of small-study effects. Nevertheless, publication bias cannot be entirely ruled out, and the current evidence derived exclusively from Chinese RCTs may limit the generalizability of findings to other populations, particularly given region-specific variations in clinical practice. Given these limitations, clinicians and policymakers should interpret results for frequency of angina, nitroglycerin dosages, TC, and LDL-C with particular caution. In this study, the treatment course was a significant source of heterogeneity. Moreover, concerns regarding methodological limitations, particularly the inadequate documentation of allocation concealment and blinding implementation, persist as prevalent issues in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs. These methodological flaws also contribute substantially to the observed heterogeneity. Based on methodological considerations, we propose the following recommendations: 1) Future meta-analyses would benefit from including unpublished data or gray literature to mitigate bias. 2) Large-scale, rigorously designed trials are needed to verify these findings and enhance the quality of evidence, especially for outcomes with heterogeneous methodologies. 3) Future studies should incorporate international clinical trials to validate external validity and minimize confounding from cultural or medical practice disparities.
Additionally, by conducting in-depth research on the clinical efficacy of specific TCM preparations in terms of key indicators such as hs-CRP, PV, and MACEs, we comprehensively and systematically analyzed the action mechanisms and values of TCM preparations in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The research results strongly confirm the significant advantages of TCM in improving cardiovascular risks, optimizing inflammation monitoring, and enhancing treatment effects. Meanwhile, the findings of this study also provide a basis for the selection of TCM preparations with multiple therapeutic advantages in clinical practice. These findings are expected to promote the standardization and precision of TCM treatment for CHD, opening up new avenues for the clinical treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
4.4 Limitations
There are some limitations of this study. 1) All the included RCTs were in China. 2) The quality of the included RCTs needs to be improved, half of the 72 included RCTs did not mention the method of random sequence generation, only 3 RCTs mentioned allocation concealment, 4 RCTs mentioned blinding of participants and staff, and none of the studies described blinding of outcome assessment, all the above may affect the reliability of the overall findings. 3) Clinical heterogeneity existed due to differences in dosage and duration of treatment for different interventions. 4) MACEs are important outcome indicators for UAP, and there were fewer studies on this. 5) Most studies primarily assessed adverse reactions based on symptoms, with inconsistent reporting standards; Additionally, there was a lack of reporting on safety indicators. 6) The quality of evidence is also negatively affected by the fact that this NMA did not constitute a closed loop.
5 Conclusion
In conclusion, SSTCM-OPs combined with CT showed advantages over CT alone in treating UAP. Among them, MXK + CT demonstrates excellent clinical efficacy in the management of UAP. Additionally, XZK, YXTZ, and MXK combined with CT may improve lipid levels and contribute to secondary prevention in unstable angina pectoris patients. Meanwhile, XZK + CT is more effective in improving LDL-C levels and preventing MACEs compared with XST + CT, establishing it as a suitable option for preventing cardiovascular risk events. These findings underscore the need for personalized treatment strategies based on individual patient characteristics, which may substantially improve clinical efficacy and mitigate the disease burden in UAP patients.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
XcL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. XhL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. XZ: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – review and editing. XX: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – review and editing. RS: Data curation, Software, Validation, Writing – review and editing. TW: Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. JK: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. YH: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82205021) and Special Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine Research in Henan Province (Grant No. 2021JDZX105).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1582661/full#supplementary-material
Glossary
- ACS
Acute coronary syndrome
- ASCVD
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
- C
Control group
- CAM
Complementary and alternative medicine
- CCS
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Scale
- CHD
Coronary heart disease
- CI
95% confidence intervals
- CNKI
China National Knowledge Infrastructure
- CT
Conventional treatments
- DAXXK
Diaoxinxuekang oral preparation
- DZHJT
Dazhuhongjingtian oral preparation
- ECG
Electrocardiogram
- F
Female
- GBE50
Ginkgo biloba extract 50
- GBEs
Ginkgo biloba extracts
- GSTT
Gross Saponins of Tribulus terrestris L.
- HDL-C
High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
- HMG-CoA
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A
- hs-CRP
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein
- LDL-C
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- M
Male
- MACEs
Major adverse cardiovascular events
- MD
Mean difference
- MXK
Maixuekang oral preparation
- NA
Not available
- NMA
Network meta-analysis
- SSTCM-OPs
Oral preparations of single-source traditional Chinese medicines
- PNSs
Panax notoginseng saponins
- PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- PV
Plasma viscosity
- RCTs
Randomized controlled trials
- RR
Relative Risk
- CBM
China Biomedical Literature Database
- SMD
Standardized mean difference
- SNOSE
sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes
- SUCRA
Surface under the cumulative ranking curve
- T
Treatment group
- TC
Total cholesterol
- TCM
Traditional Chinese medicine
- TG
Triglyceride
- UAP
Unstable angina pectoris
- VIP
China Science and Technology Journal Database
- XDK
Xindakang oral preparation
- XNST
Xinnaoshutong oral preparation
- XST
Xuesaitong oral preparation
- XY
Xinyue oral preparation
- XZK
Xuezhikang oral preparation
- YXTZ
Yinxingtongzhi oral preparation
- YXY
Yinxingye oral preparation
- ZY
Zhenyuan oral preparation
- β
Regression coefficient
References
1
AmsterdamE. A.WengerN. K.BrindisR. G.CaseyD. E.Jr.GaniatsT. G.HolmesD. R.Jr.et al (2014). 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation130, 344–426. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134
2
Arroyo-EspligueroR.AvanzasP.Cosín-SalesJ.AldamaG.PizziC.KaskiJ. C. (2004). C-reactive protein elevation and disease activity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart. J.25, 401–408. 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.12.017
3
BaoY.ZhaoY.LiM.WangX.LiM. (2013). Regulation of Ginkgo biloba extract on hemorheological parameters and immune function in acute blood stasis rats. J. Basic. Chin. Med.19, 904–906. 10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2013.08.024
4
BiernackaP.AdamskaI.FelisiakK. (2023). The potential of Ginkgo biloba as a source of biologically active compounds-A review of the recent literature and patents. Molecules28, 3993. 10.3390/molecules28103993
5
BraunwaldE.MorrowD. A. (2013). Unstable angina: is it time for a requiem?Circulation127, 2452–2457. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001258
6
BuffonA.BiasucciL. M.LiuzzoG.D’OnofrioG.CreaF.MaseriA. (2002). Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N. Engl. J. Med.347, 5–12. 10.1056/NEJMoa012295
7
CaoG.LuW.YeH.TianY.HaoH. (2018). Rapid identification of constituents from different Ginkgo biloba preparations by high resolution mass spectrometry and metabolomics technology. J. China. Pharm. Univ.49, 441–448. 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.20180409
8
ChenD. (2015). Efficacy of Xuezhikang capsule and Atorvastatin on blood lipids in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Chin. J. Integr. Med. Cardio/Cerebrovasc. Dis.13, 914–916. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1349.2015.07.018
9
ChenJ.XieZ.YeS.WangK.WangS.ZhangQ. (2010). Effect of Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE50) on the metabolism of triglyceride in HepG2 cells. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull.26, 961–964.
10
Chinese Association of Integrative Medicine, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Cardiovascular Disease Working Group, Encephalopathy Disease Working Group, China Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine (2020). Chinese expert consensus on clinical application of oral Ginkgo biloba preparations (2020). Chin. J. Integr. Med.27, 163–169. 10.1007/s11655-021-3289-6
11
ChenM. (2012). Clinical observation on Ginkgo Leaf drop pills in the treatment of 85 cases of unstable angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Chin. Health. Ind.9, 66. 10.16659/j.cnki.1672-5654.2012.07.079
12
ChenS.ChenL. (2021). Effect of Maixuekang capsule combined with Aspirin on vasoactive substances and inflammatory factors in patients with unstable angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. J. Med. Forum.42, 16–19.
13
ChenS.ZhuX.LiL. (2021). The effects of the Maixuekang capsule plus trimetazidine on electrocardiogram and hemorheology in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Clin. J. Chin. Med.13, 43–45. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2021.05.012
14
ChenY.HeW.CaoH.WangZ.LiuJ.WangB.et al (2023). Research progress of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Front. Cardiovasc. Med.11, 1477636. 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1477636
15
ChengJ.KondoK.SuzukiY.IkedaY.MengX.UmemuraK. (2003). Inhibitory effects of total flavones of Hippophae Rhamnoides L on thrombosis in mouse femoral artery and in vitro platelet aggregation. Life. Sci.72, 2263–2271. 10.1016/s0024-3205(03)00114-0
16
Chinese Society of Cardiology and Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of CardiologyEditorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology (2024). Guidelines for the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (2024). Chin. J. Cardiovasc. Med.52, 615–646. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20240107-00014
17
ChoiK. T. (2008). Botanical characteristics, pharmacological effects and medicinal components of Korean Panax ginseng C A Meyer. Acta. Pharmacol. Sin.29, 1109–1118. 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00869.x
18
ColletJ.-P.ThieleH.BarbatoE.BarthélémyO.BauersachsJ.BhattD. L.et al (2021). 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur. Heart. J.42, 1289–1367. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
19
CuiF.WeiQ.LiuC.ZhangM. (2014). Curative effect and safety of Xuezhikang capsule in patients with unstable angina pectoris complicating elevated liver enzymes. Chin. J. Evid. BASED. Cardiovasc. Med.6, 208–210. 10.3969/j.1674-4055.2014.02.26
20
CuiF.ZhangY.WeiQ.LiuC.WangJ.ZhangM. (2015). A novel medical treatment for lipid control in patients with unstable angina pectoris and statin-induced liver dysfunction. Acta. Cardiol. Sin.31, 66–71. 10.6515/acs20140721b
21
CuiG.LiF. (2016). Influence of Xuezhikang on blood lipids, inflammatory factors and carotid atherosclerotic plaques in patients with unstable angina. J. Clin. Med. Pract.20, 54–60. 10.7619/jcmp.201623016
22
DaiJ.QiuL.LuY.LiM. (2024). Recent advances of traditional Chinese medicine against cardiovascular disease: overview and potential mechanisms. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne).30, 1366285. 10.3389/fendo.2024.1366285
23
DaiM.LiuF.YangR. (2015). Clinical study on unstable angina pectoris in the elderly with elevated transaminase induced by statins. Chin. J. Clin. Res.28, 315–317. 10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2015.03.015
24
DaiX.ZhuoX.WangL.XueX.YangW.YuX.et al (1999). Effect of Xuezhikang capsule on dyslipidemia in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Tradit. Chin. Drug. Res. Clin. Pharm.10, 202–204. 10.19378/j.issn.1003-9783.1999.04.003
25
Department of Internal Medicine Society of Chinese Medicine Society (2008). Criteria for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac paralysis. Chin. J. Clin. Pharmacol.23 (02), 66.
26
DingX.HeX.TangB.LanT. (2024). Integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the prevention and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: future directions and strategies. Chin. Med.19, 21. 10.1186/s13020-024-00894-1
27
DongY.ChenH.LiuY.ZhuS.FengL.WangJ. (2020). Clinical study of Xuesetong soft capsules intervening in the lncR CTB114C7.4-miR3656-BCL2A1 regulatory network in patients with coronary heart disease and blood stasis syndrome. World. Sci. Technol. Mod. Tradit. Chin. Med. Mater. Medica.22, 3846–3852. 10.11842/wst.20200811016
28
DongY.YuR. (2015). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Ginkgo biloba ester drop pills in the treatment of 60 cases of unstable angina pectoris. Chin. J. Integr. Med. Cardio/Cerebrovasc. Dis.13, 233–234. 10.3969/j.issn.16721349.2015.02.037
29
DuY.YeY.ZhuJ. (2018). Effect of Ginkgo biloba tablets combined with western medicine in the treatment of unstable angina and its effect on vascular endothelial function. Guizhou Med. J.42, 1441–1443. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2018.12.015
30
DuanL.LiuY.LiJ.ZhangY.DongY.LiuC.et al (2022). Panax notoginseng saponins alleviate coronary artery disease through hypermethylation of the miR-194-MAPK pathway. Front. Pharmacol.16, 829416. 10.3389/fphar.2022.829416
31
FanH.ZhangM. (2023). Effect of Xuesaitong soft capsules on vascular endothelial function and inflammatory factors in patients with unstable angina pectoris. World. J. Integr. Tradit. West. Med.18, 328–332. 10.13935/j.cnki.sjzx.230220
32
FanY.ZhangY.DuL.WangP.WangL.ShenT.et al (1992). Anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects of hirudin. J. Cardiovasc. Pulm. Dis.11, 37–39.
33
FengX.ChenS.ChangJ. (2009). 32 cases of elderly unstable angina pectoris treated with Xuesetong soft capsule. Chin. J. Tradit. Med. Sci. Tech.16, 320. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7072.2009.04.037
34
FerenceB. A.GrahamI.TokgozogluL.CatapanoA. L. (2018). Impact of lipids on cardiovascular health: JACC health promotion series. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.72, 1141–1156. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.046
35
FerrariR.CamiciP. G.CreaF.DanchinN.FoxK.MaggioniA. P.et al (2018). Expert consensus document: a ‘diamond’ approach to personalized treatment of angina. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.15, 120–132. 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.131
36
FuC. F.LiJ. L.ChenJ. W.LiangH.ZhaoW. R.HeS. Y.et al (2024). Mechanism and therapeutic potential of traditional Chinese medicine extracts in sepsis. Front. Pharmacol.3, 1365639. 10.3389/fphar.2024.1365639
37
GaoL.YangQ.WangZ.HuY. (2013). Influence of Maixuekang Capsules on lipid metabolism and expression of adhesion molecule in hyperlipidemia rats. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med.35, 1–5.
38
GaoM. (2010). 50 cases of unstable angina pectoris due to coronary heart disease treated with Maixuekang capsule. Chin. J. Integr. Med. Cardio/Cerebrovasc. Dis.8, 1172–1173. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1349.2010.10.012
39
GaoY.GaoH. (2013). Observation on the efficacy of Ginkgo Leaf dripping pill in auxiliary treatment of unstable angina pectoris and the influence on P-selectin. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.19, 291–293. 10.11653/syfj2013120291
40
GeL.ZhaoS. (2010). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Xuesetong soft capsules in treating 96 cases of unstable angina pectoris. Hebei. J. Tradit. Chin. Med.32, 1223–1229. 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2619.2010.08.059
41
GuX.XieZ.WangQ.LiuG.QuY.ZhangL.et al (2009). Transcriptome profiling analysis reveals multiple modulatory effects of Ginkgo biloba extract in the liver of rats on a high-fat diet. FEBS. J.276, 1450–1458. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06886.x
42
GuoY.YinG.LiJ.XiaoH. (2011). Effect of natural and recombinant hirudin on vascular endothelial cell growth factor in random skin flap congestion models. Chin. J. Tissue. Eng. Res.15, 1210–1214. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.07.015
43
GuoY.YinH.ShiD.ChenK. (2006). Effect of Xinnao Shutong capsule on cardiac muscle cell apoptosis and protein expressions of Bcl-2 and Bax in hyperlipidemia rats after myocardial infarction. Chin. J. Integr. Tradit. West. Med.26, 541–544. 10.3321/j.issn:1003-5370.2006.06.016
44
HanssonG. K.LibbyP.TabasI. (2015). Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. J. Intern. Med.278, 483–493. 10.1111/joim.12406
45
HaoP.JiangF.ChengJ.MaL.ZhangY.ZhaoY. (2017). Traditional Chinese medicine for cardiovascular disease: evidence and potential mechanisms. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.69, 2952–2966. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.041
46
HaoS. (2022). Effects of Maixuekang capsule combined with Nicorandil on vasoactive substances and cytokines in patients with unstable angina. Harbin. Med. J.42, 122–123. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2022.01.057
47
HeS. (2014). Clinical observation on treating chest pain with Yinxingye Diwan. Clin. J. Chin. Med.6, 46–47. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2014.16.023
48
HigginsJ. P.FauA. D.GøtzscheP. C.JüniP.MoherD.OxmanA. D.et al (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ343, d5928. 10.1136/bmj.d5928
49
HuY.YangQ.GaoL. (2014). Influence of Maixuekang capsule on lipid metabolism and expression of lectin like oxidized low density lipoprotein receptor-1 in early atherosclerosis rats. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.20, 157–161. 10.11653/syfj2014060157
50
HuangB.ZhangM. (2023). Therapeutic effect of Xuesaitong soft capsules combined conventional western medicine drug on unstable angina pectoris. J. Chin. Foreign. Med. Pharm. Res.2, 96–98.
51
HuangH. (2016). Effect of Ginkgo biloba extract on clinical symptoms and serum hs-CRP in patients with unstable angina pectoris. J. Bethune. Milit. Med. Coll.14, 294–296. 10.16485/j.issn.2095-7858.2016.03.013
52
HuangK. (2022). Effect of Xindakang capsules combined with Nicorandil in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Med. Innov. Chin.19, 22–26. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2022.17.006
53
HuangY. (2018). Effect of Xindakang combined with atorvastatin on unstable angina pectoris of coronary heart disease and it’s influence on serum NO, ET-1 and VEGF. Chin. Med. Pharm.8, 160–163. 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2018.16.047
54
HuttonB.SalantiG.CaldwellD. M.ChaimaniA.SchmidC. H.CameronC.et al (2015). The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann. Intern. Med.162, 777–784. 10.7326/m14-2385
55
JiaC.ZhangX.XuG.ZhaoK.GuanM. (2023). Progress of origin and clinical application of ginseng. Eval. Anal. Drug-Use Hosp. Chin.23, 123–128. 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2023.01.026
56
JiaX. (2014). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Ginkgo Leaf drop pills in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Pract. J. Card. Cereb. Pneumal. Vasc. Dis.22, 44–45. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5971.2014.02.021
57
JiangL.YangZ.BaoY. (2017). Effects of GBE50 on Hemodynamics and TNF-α pathway in myocardial tissue of rats with acute blood stasis syndrome. Chin. J. Inf. Tradit. Chin. Med.24, 34–38. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5304.2017.11.009
58
KaulP.NaylorC. D.ArmstrongP. W.MarkD. B.TherouxP.DagenaisG. R. (2009). Assessment of activity status and survival according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification. Can. J. Cardiol.25, e225–e231. 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70506-9
59
KavanaghB. P. (2009). The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines. PLoS Med.6, e1000094. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000094
60
KimD. H. (2012). Chemical diversity of Panax ginseng, Panax quinquifolium, and Panax notoginseng. J. Ginseng. Res.36, 1–15. 10.5142/jgr.2012.36.1.1
61
KlingenbergR.AghlmandiS.GencerB.NanchenD.RäberL.CarballoD.et al (2021). Residual inflammatory risk at 12 months after acute coronary syndromes is frequent and associated with combined adverse events. Atherosclerosis320, 31–37. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.01.012
62
KuangG.HuangZ.BaiC.HuY.DaiT. (2011). Effect of Xuesetong soft capsule on unstable angina pectoris and its effect on QT dispersion of electrocardiogram. Lingnan. J. Emerg. Med.16, 455–456. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-301X.2011.06.019
63
LiG.LiuL.LvY.GuQ. (2021). Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Xuezhikang and simvastatin in the treatment of primary hyperlipidemia in Chinese adults. Chin. J. Clin. Pharmacol.37, 305–307. 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2021.03.024
64
LiJ. (2014). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Maixuekang capsule in treating 80 cases of unstable angina pectoris. Inn. Mong. J. Tradit. Chin. Med.33, 10–11. 10.16040/j.cnki.cn15-1101.2014.34.011
65
LiJ.HouH.LiQ.LiuJ.ZhaoY.ZhaoC.et al (2024). Cardiac organ chip: advances in construction and application. Biomater. Transl.5, 411–424. 10.12336/biomatertransl.2024.04.006
66
LiM.BaoY.LiuA.WangX.LiuJ.ZhangZ. (2013). Effect of Ginkgo biloba extract 50 on ventricular remodeling in rats with pressure overloaded. Pharmacol. Clin. Chin. Mater. Med.29, 78–82. 10.13412/j.cnki.zyyl.2013.04.007
67
LiW.YuanL.LiuT. (2003). Clinical study on Xindakang and Nifedipine for treating unstable angina pectoris. Lingnan. J. Emerg. Med8, 260–261. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-301X.2003.04.009
68
LiZ.WangX.ChangH. (2019). Clinical study on Ginkgo ketone ester dropping pills combined with ticagrelor in treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Drugs. Clin.34, 360–365. 10.7501/j.issn.1674-5515.2019.02.019
69
LibbyP. (2001). Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation104, 365–372. 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.365
70
LibbyP.LoscalzoJ.RidkerP. M.FarkouhM. E.HsueP. Y.FusterV.et al (2018). Inflammation, immunity, and infection in atherothrombosis: JACC review topic of the week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.72, 2071–2081. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1043
71
LinG.LinB.ZhuJ.PanX.YinG. (2018). Effect of natural hirudin on angiogenesis of human microvascular endothelial cells. Chin. J. Repar. Reconstr. Surg.32, 1586–1591. 10.7507/1002-1892.201806055
72
LinH.YangL.ZhengD. (2009). Observation on the efficacy of simvastatin combined with Xuezhikang in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Chin. Med. Her.6, 58–59. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2009.23.028
73
LinY.HanY.WangY. (2024). Traditional Chinese medicine for cardiovascular disease: efficacy and safety. Front. Cardiovasc. Med.3, 1419169. 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1419169
74
LiuB.ZhangG.LiuA.ZhangZ.WangX. (2021). GBE50 alleviates cardiac arrhythmias via inhibition of INa and ICa, L and spontaneous calcium waves. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull.37, 1721–1726. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1978.2021.12.016
75
LiuG.HuD.TaoP.ZhuJ.GuoL.GuoJ.et al (1998). Proposal of clinical trial evaluation methods for cardiovascular drugs. Chin. J. Cardiovasc. Dis.26 (06), 5–11.
76
LiuH.WangL.WeiW. (2013). Effect of Xuezhikang capsule on inflammatory factors, endothelial function and carotid atherosclerotic plaques in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.19, 322–327. 10.11653/syfj2013160322
77
LiuJ. (2015). Observation on the efficacy of Xinyue capsule combined with trimetazidine hydrochloride in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Electron. J. Clin. Med. Lit.2, 2576. 10.16281/j.cnki.jocml.2015.13.085
78
LiuJ.LiJ.YangG.WangJ. (2008). Study on effect of promoting blood circulation drugs components in treating unstable angina in patients with blood stasis inflammatory levels. Chin. J. Chin. Med. Mater. Medica.33, 2950–2953. 10.3321/j.issn:1001-5302.2008.24.021
79
LiuQ.WangZ.SongS. (2018a). The effect of Zhenyuan capsule on high sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with unstable angina. Chin. Med. Rec.19, 106–109. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2018.03.036
80
LiuX. (2020). Effect of Ginkgo ketone ester drop pills on hemorheology and serum oxidative stress in patients with unstable angina. Med. Innov. Chin.17, 20–24. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2020.07.005
81
LiuY.ChangK.ZhouX. (2018b). Clinical effect of Yinxing Tongzhi dripping pills in patientswith angina pectoris and the influence on inflammatory factor expression. J. Clin. Psychosom. Dis.24, 142–145. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-187X.2018.05.038
82
LiuY.LiuT.ZhaoJ.HeT.ChenH.WangJ.et al (2019). Phospholipase Cγ2 signalling contributes to the haemostatic effect of notoginsenoside Ft1. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.71, 878–886. 10.1111/jphp.13057
83
LiuY.NiuP.YanJ.JiH.WangZ.JinX.et al (2024a). Efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba extract in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Ethnopharmacol.15, 118297. 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118297
84
LiuY.YinY.HanN.JiaZ. (2024b). Effect and mechanism of hirudin on hypoxia induced interstitial transdifferentiation of cardiac microvascular endothelial cells. Chin. J. Difficult. Complicat. Cases.23, 1120–1126. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2024.09.018
85
LiuY.ZhuY. (2019). Effect of large-strain Rhodiola rosea in the auxiliary treatment of unstable angina pectoris in the elderly and its effect on serum inflammatory factors. Mod. J. Integr. Tradit. Chin. West. Med.28, 3836–3839. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2019.34.018
86
LuL. (2022). Clinical efficacy of Xinyue capsule combined with conventional treatment in postmenopausal patients with unstable angina and chronic insomnia. New. Mom. New. Born.22, 137–139.
87
LuoG.YuD. (2013). Effects of Yinxing Tongzhi guttate pills in the treatment of angina pectoris after percutaneous coronary intervention. Sichuan. J. Physiol. Sci.35, 106–108. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3885.2013.03.005
88
LuoY. (2013). Analysis of the therapeutic effect of Maixuekang capsule in treating 56 cases of unstable angina pectoris. Chin. J. Integr. Med. Cardio/Cerebrovasc. Dis.11, 414. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1349.2013.04.014
89
MaL.DengX. (2019). Observation on clinical efficacy of Xuezhikang combined with atorvastatin in the treatment of UA with elevated TG. Chin. Pract. Med.14, 1–3. 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2019.35.001
90
MaJ.MaY.ChenH.XieS.ZhangL. (2009). Effect of Xinnaoshutong capsule on vascular endothelium function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with unstable angina. Chin. J. Integr. Med. Cardio/Cerebrovasc. Dis.7, 1276–1277. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1349.2009.11.009
91
MaX.LiY.HanZ.WangX.XuG. (2014). Clinical comparative analysis of the lipid-regulating effects of Xuezhikang and Simvastatin on patients with unstable angina pectoris. Chin. Foreign. Med. Treat.33, 144–146. 10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2014.30.032
92
MachF.BaigentC.CatapanoA. L.KoskinasK. C.CasulaM.BadimonL.et al (2020). 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart. J.41, 111–188. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455
93
ManC.DaiZ.FanY. (2020). Dazhu Hongjingtian preparation as adjuvant therapy for unstable angina pectoris: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Pharmacol.10, 213. 10.3389/fphar.2020.00213
94
MancusoC.SantangeloR. (2017). Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius: from pharmacology to toxicology. Food. Chem. Toxicol.107, 362–372. 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.019
95
ManfrediR.VerdoiaM. A.-O.CompagnucciP. A.-O.BarbarossaA.StronatiG. A.-O.CasellaM.et al (2022). Angina in 2022: current perspectives. J. Clin. Med.11, 6891. 10.3390/jcm11236891
96
MbuagbawL.RochwergB.JaeschkeR.Heels-AndsellD.AlhazzaniW.ThabaneL.et al (2017). Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses. Syst. Rev.6, 79. 10.1186/s13643-017-0473-z
97
MeiN.GuoX.RenZ.KobayashiD.WadaK.GuoL. (2017). Review of Ginkgo biloba-induced toxicity, from experimental studies to human case reports. J. Environ. Sci. Health. C. Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev.35, 1–28. 10.1080/10590501.2016.1278298
98
National Center for Cardiovascular Disease (2024). Report on cardiovascular health and disease in China 2023. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press.
99
National Pharmacopoeia Commission (2020). Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Vol. I. Beijing: China Medical Science Press.
100
NinoA. K. P.Brignardello-PetersenR. (2023). How to read a network meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. Focus9, 701–704. 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.018
101
OesterleA.LaufsU.LiaoJ. K. (2017). Pleiotropic effects of statins on the cardiovascular system. Circ. Res.120, 229–243. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308537
102
PengX.ZhangJ.HuY.SuM. (2020). Effect of Ginkgo biloba dispersible tablets combined with metoprolol tartrate on unstable angina pectoris. Henan Med. Res.29, 684–685. 10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2020.04.057
103
PradhanA. D.AdayA. W.RoseL. M.RidkerP. M. (2018). Residual inflammatory risk on treatment with PCSK9 inhibition and statin therapy. Circulation138, 141–149. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034645
104
QianY.ZhuG.WangW.GaoQ. (2021). Research progress on clinical and pharmacological effects of Ginkgo biloba esters and their preparations. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med.43, 998–1003. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528.2021.04.031
105
RaschiE.GirardiA.PoluzziE.ForcesiE.Menniti-IppolitoF.MazzantiG.et al (2018). Adverse events to food supplements containing red yeast rice: comparative analysis of FAERS and CAERS reporting systems. Drug. Saf.41, 745–752. 10.1007/s40264-018-0661-3
106
ReichlinT.TwerenboldR.MaushartC.ReiterM.MoehringB.SchaubN.et al (2013). Risk stratification in patients with unstable angina using absolute serial changes of 3 high-sensitive troponin assays. Am. Heart. J.165, 371–8.e3. 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.11.010
107
RenD.PengS. (2006). Clinical observation on 38 cases of coronary artery disease with instable angina pectoris treated by Xuezhikang capsule combined with western medicine. Guid. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. Pharm.12, 25–26. 10.13862/j.cnki.cn43-1446/r.2006.11.010
108
RidkerP. M. (2016). Residual inflammatory risk: addressing the obverse side of the atherosclerosis prevention coin. Eur. Heart. J.37, 1720–1722. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw024
109
RiveraD.AllkinR.ObónC.AlcarazF.VerpoorteR.HeinrichM. (2013). What is in a name? The need for accurate scientific nomenclature for plants. J. Ethnopharmacol.152, 393–402. 10.1016/j.jep.2013.12.022
110
RothmanA. M.MacFadyenJ.ThurenT.WebbA.HarrisonD. G.GuzikT. J.et al (2020). Effects of interleukin-1β inhibition on blood pressure, incident hypertension, and residual inflammatory risk: a secondary analysis of cantos. Hypertension75, 477–482. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13642
111
SchillingerM.ExnerM.AmighiJ.MlekuschW.SabetiS.RumpoldH.et al (2003). Joint effects of C-reactive protein and glycated hemoglobin in predicting future cardiovascular events of patients with advanced atherosclerosis. Circulation108, 2323–2328. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095267.24234.00
112
ShamseerL.MoherD.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.et al (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ349, g7647. 10.1136/bmj.g7647
113
ShaoY.ChenY.ZhuQ.YiL.MaY.ZangX.et al (2025). The pharmacology and toxicology of ginkgolic acids: secondary metabolites from Ginkgo biloba. Am. J. Chin. Med.53, 147–177. 10.1142/S0192415X25500077
114
ShenG.FanS.TianX. (2014). Influence of big plant Rhodiola capsule treat on unstable angina patients. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.20, 200–203. 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2014160200
115
ShengY.DaiY.TangB.FengQ.ZhangY. (2022). Effects of Ginkgo biloba ketone ester dropping pills combined with metoprolol on myocardial enzyme indexes, oxidative stress and peripheral blood IL-33/ST2 signal pathway in patients with unstable angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. Prog. Mod. Biomed.22, 4465–4469. 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.23.013
116
ShiC.QuW.WangJ.DengT. (2009). Effect of tribu saponin from Tribulus terrestris on the formation of atherosclerosis in rats. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev.21, 53–57. 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2009.01.027
117
SongH.WangP.LiuJ.WangC. (2017). Panax notoginseng preparations for unstable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytother. Res.31, 1162–1172. 10.1002/ptr.5848
118
SongY. (2021). Effects of Ginkgo biloba dispersible tablets combined with metoprolol tartrate on symptom improvement and oxidative stress indexes in patients with unstable angina. Clin. Res.29, 76–77.
119
ȘtefănescuR.Tero-VescanA.NegroiuA.AuricăE.VariC. E. (2020). A comprehensive review of the phytochemical, pharmacological, and toxicological properties of Tribulus terrestris L. Biomolecules10, 752. 10.3390/biom10050752
120
SuH.TianR.XueQ.ZhangH. (2017). Clinical effect and safety of Xuezhikang tablets combined with clopidogrel in treating unstable angina pectoris patients complicated with atherosclerosis. Pract. J. Card. Cereb. Pneumal. Vasc. Dis.25, 77–79. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5971.2017.03.019
121
SunK.FanJ.HanJ. (2015). Ameliorating effects of traditional Chinese medicine preparation, Chinese materia medica and active compounds on ischemia/reperfusion-induced cerebral microcirculatory disturbances and neuron damage. Acta. Pharm. Sin. B5, 8–24. 10.1016/j.apsb.2014.11.002
122
SunX.LiG.PengZ.YinD.ZhaoY. (2024). Effect and clinical efficacy of Ginkgo biloba tablets on fibroblast growth factor 4 in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Chin. J. Clin. Res.37, 1412–1417. 10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2024.09.020
123
TaoY.ZhuF.PanM.LiuQ.WangP. (2022). Pharmacokinetic, metabolism, and metabolomic strategies provide deep insight into the underlying mechanism of Ginkgo biloba flavonoids in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Front. Nutr.23, 857370. 10.3389/fnut.2022.857370
124
TzoulakiI.MurrayG. D.LeeA. J.RumleyA.LoweG. D.FowkesF. G. (2007). Relative value of inflammatory, hemostatic, and rheological factors for incident myocardial infarction and stroke: the Edinburgh Artery Study. Circulation115, 2119–2127. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.635029
125
Vallejo-VazA. J.GinsbergH. N.DavidsonM. H.EckelR. H.CannonC. P.LeeL. V.et al (2018). Lower on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and major adverse cardiovascular events in women and men: pooled analysis of 10 ODYSSEY phase 3 alirocumab trials. J. Am. Heart. Assoc.7, e009221. 10.1161/JAHA.118.009221
126
WangJ.HeQ. Y. (2010). Thinking on how to construct the system of Chinese medicine efficacy evaluation for coronary heart disease angina pectoris. Chin. J. Integr. Med.16, 75–78. 10.1007/s11655-010-0075-2
127
WangJ.LiuH.WangW. (2023a). Hirudin affects vascular smooth muscle cells in the rat model of hyperhomocysteine. World. Chin. Med.18, 1374–1378. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2023.10.004
128
WangJ.TengF.LiuY.ChenG. (2017). Invention effect of Xuesaitong for coronary heart disease unstable angina with blood stasis and relevant microRNA. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae.23, 11–16. 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2017190011
129
WangJ.WangQ.SunJ.ShaC.DuanZ.LiuW. (2015). Assay of potency for Xuezhikang by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase. Chin. J. New. Drugs.24, 1825–1830.
130
WangL.LiuX.WangQ.QiL. (2013). Effect of ginkgo ketone ester dispersible tablet on blood rheology of rats with acute blood stasis. Chin. J. New. Drugs.22, 2802–2804.
131
WangL.SunX. (2012). Clinical observation on treating 60 cases of unstable angina with the Yinxing Yedi pill. Clin. J. Chin. Med.4, 75–76. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2012.05.041
132
WangW.LiC.XuP.XueH. (2006). Effect of Xuezhikang on the levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tumor necrosis factor in patients with unstable angina pectoris. J. Liaoning. Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med.08, 68–69. 10.13194/j.jlunivtcm.2006.02.70.wangwl.036
133
WangW. J.ZhangT. (2017). Integration of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in the era of precision medicine. J. Integr. Med.15, 1–7. 10.1016/S2095-4964(17)60314-5
134
WangX. (2015). Clinical observation on the effect of Xinnao Shutong capsule on angina pectoris caused by coronary heart disease. Chin. Health. Care. Nutr.25, 295.
135
WangX.ZhuG.NingK.JiangM.BaoY.GaoQ.et al (2023b). Preventive effect of Ginkgo biloba esters on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by activating ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med.45, 3052–3057. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528.2023.09.041
136
WangY. (2022). Clinical efficacy of Zhenyuan capsule in adjuvant treatment of unstable angina pectoris and its effect on blood NT-proBNP and HCY levels. J. Med. Inf.35, 88–91. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.21.020
137
WangZ.HuY.SimaX.WangJ. (2012). Analysis of efficacy and safety of maixuekang capsule for unstable angina. Chin. Med.7, 1062–1063. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2012.09.003
138
WangZ.LiuJ.LiJ.WuN.LuoG.ChenZ.et al (2023c). Chinese guidelines for lipid management (2023). Chin. Circ. J.38, 237–271. 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2023.08.001
139
WeiY. (2010). Clinical evaluation of Xuesaitong soft capsules on treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Chin. J. Mod. Drug. Appl.4, 20–21. 10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2010.23.009
140
WuG. (2014). Efficacy of Ginkgo biloba ester dropping pills combined with western medicine in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris and its effect on plasma P-selectin. Shanxi. J. Tradit. Chin. Med.35, 1470–1471. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2014.11.017
141
WuG. S.LiH. K.ZhangW. D. (2019). Metabolomics and its application in the treatment of coronary heart disease with traditional Chinese medicine. Chin. J. Nat. Med.17, 321–330. 10.1016/S1875-5364(19)30037-8
142
WuS.WangC.BaiD.ChenN.HuJ.ZhangJ. (2023). Perspectives of international multi-center clinical trials on traditional Chinese herbal medicine. Front. Pharmacol.18, 1195364. 10.3389/fphar.2023.1195364
143
WuW.FengL.JiaX. (2022). Nomenclature standardization of Chinese medicine extracts and components. Chin. J. Chin. Mater. Med.47, 1126–1131. 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210901.601
144
XiaZ.ZhangM. (2003). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Ginkgo biloba leaf tablets in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Chin. Heart. J.15, 182–183. 10.13191/j.chj.2003.02.88.xiazhr.033
145
XiangY.ShangH.GaoX.ZhangB. (2008). A comparison of the ancient use of ginseng in traditional Chinese medicine with modern pharmacological experiments and clinical trials. Phytother. Res.22, 851–858. 10.1002/ptr.2384
146
XieX.ChenD.YanD.GanZ. (2009). Primary studies on preparation technology and quality control standard of Zhenyuan soft capsules. Chin. J. New. Drugs.18, 1905–1909.
147
XieY.WangC. (2023). Herb-drug interactions between Panax notoginseng or its biologically active compounds and therapeutic drugs: a comprehensive pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic review. J. Ethnopharmacol.307, 116156. 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116156
148
XingT.LvX. (2015). Research on effects of the Maixuekang capsules on unstable angina and hemorheology. Clin. J. Chin. Med.7, 9–11. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2015.29.004
149
XiongL.LiL.MaQ.LiuZ.YangJ. (2008). Effect of Xuezhikang on serum inflammatory cytokines in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Sichuan Med. J.29, 148–150. 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2008.02.015
150
XiongY.LiM.SunP.LiangW.HornbeckR. G.CheX.et al (2022). Market access for Chinese herbal medicinal products in Europe-A ten-year review of relevant products, policies, and challenges. Phytomedicine103, 154237. 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154237
151
XuE.FangY. (2019). Clinical observation of Di’ao Xinxuekang Capsules combined with esmolol in treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Drugs. Clin.34, 2298–2301. 10.7501/j.issn.1674-5515.2019.08.010
152
XuW. (2020). Clinical effect of piperidine mononitrate tablets combined with Di’aoXinxuekang capsule in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Contemp. Med.26, 171–172. 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2020.30.077
153
XuY. (2016). Analysis of clinical efficacy of Di’ao Xinxuekang capsule combined with isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablets in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris. J. New. Tradit. Chin. Med.48, 26–28. 10.13457/j.cnki.jncm.2016.04.009
154
YangC.LiY.ZhangY.JiangQ.WangL. (2024). Herbal textual research on hirudo. Chin. J. Mod. Appl. Pharm.41, 2648–2657. 10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.20230875
155
YangX.XiongX.WangH.YangG.WangJ. (2013). Xuesaitong soft capsule (Chinese patent medicine) for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Evid. Based. Complement. Altern. Med. 20132013, 948319. 10.1155/2013/948319
156
YuD. (2010). The clinical analysis of Xuesaitong soft capsules in treating unstable angina patients. Proceeding. Clin. Med.19, 38–39.
157
YuL.YangB. (2023). Efficacy of Ginkgo tablets combined with Bisoprolol tablets in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris and its influence on cardiac function. Chin. J. Clin. Ration. Drug. Use.16, 5–9. 10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2023.33.002
158
YuY.LiangH.JiangK. (2023). Clinical study of Di’ao Xinxuekang soft capsules combined with metoprolol in treatment of unstable angina pectoris. Drugs. Clin.38, 2252–2257. 10.7501/j.issn.1674-5515.2023.09.021
159
YuanC.WangC.WicksS. M.QiL. (2010). Chemical and pharmacological studies of saponins with a focus on American ginseng. J. Ginseng. Res.34, 160–167. 10.5142/jgr.2010.34.3.160
160
YueH.ZhangC. (2013). Effect of Maixuekang on brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in patients with unstable angina. Cap. Food. Med.20, 67–69.
161
YueJ.ZuoZ.HuangH.WangY. (2021). Application of identification and evaluation techniques for ethnobotanical medicinal plant of genus Panax: a review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.51, 373–398. 10.1080/10408347.2020.1736506
162
ZaacksS. M.LiebsonP. R.CalvinJ. E.ParrilloJ. E.KleinL. W. (1999). Unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: does the clinical diagnosis have therapeutic implications?J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.33, 107–118. 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00553-1
163
ZengB.ZengR.LiX.DengF.LiX.LiangJ.et al (2013). Protective effects of Xindakang tablets on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury model rats. Chin. Pharm.24, 2902–2904. 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2013.31.08
164
ZhangH.ChenH.LiJ.BianY.SongY.LiZ.et al (2020a). Hirudin protects against isoproternol-induced myocardial infraction by alleviating oxidative via an Nrf2 dependent manner. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.1, 425–435. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.097
165
ZhangJ.YuX.WuN. (2011). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Ginkgo leaf drop pills in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. J. Anhui. Health. Vocat. Tech. Coll.10, 48–49. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8054.2011.02.027
166
ZhangR.RuQ.ChenX.ZhaoH.QiG.XiaY.et al (2020b). Clinical efficacy of Xinyue capsule combined with conventional treatment in postmenopausal patients with unstable angina and chronic insomnia. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med.42, 1667–1670. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528.2020.06.055
167
ZhangR.TangF.LiuJ. (2012). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Xinnao Shutong capsule on patients with unstable angina and its effect on hypersensitive C-reactive protein. Chin. J. Ethnomed. Ethnopharm.21, 30–32. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1349.2010.05.055
168
ZhangS.LiH.YangS. J. (2010). Tribulosin protects rat hearts from ischemia/reperfusion injury. Acta. Pharmacol. Sin.31, 671–678. 10.1038/aps.2010.45
169
ZhangW.ChenW.ChenG. (2020c). Research progress of di’ao xinxuekang. Chin. Tradit. Pat. Med.44, 183–186. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528.2022.01.034
170
ZhaoC.FuJ.WangY.ZhouY. (2025). Latest evidence and perspectives of Panax notoginseng extracts and preparations for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases: a review. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.85, 248–260. 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001670
171
ZhaoJ. (2002). Clinical observation on the treatment of unstable angina pectoris with Xuesetong. J. Qiqihar. Med. Univ.23, 998–999. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2005.01.015
172
ZhengX. (2002). Guiding principles of clinical research on new drugs of Chinese medicines. Beijing: Chinese Medicine Science and technology Publishing house.
173
ZhouJ. (2019). Observation on the therapeutic effect of Maixuekang capsule in treating unstable angina pectoris. Shenzhen. J. Integr. Tradit. Chin. West. Med.29, 59–60. 10.16458/j.cnki.1007-0893.2019.12.027
174
ZhuY.LiY. (2008). Clinical observation on the effect of Xuezhikang on unstable angina pectoris. Chin. Med. Her.5, 63–64. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7210.2008.31.038
Summary
Keywords
network meta-analysis, traditional Chinese medicine, unstable angina pectoris, oral preparation, ethnopharmacology research
Citation
Li X, Li X, Zhu X, Xin X, Sheng R, Wang T, Kan J and Huang Y (2025) Efficacy and safety of 11 oral preparations of single-source traditional Chinese medicines in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1582661. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1582661
Received
24 February 2025
Accepted
04 June 2025
Published
24 June 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Michael Heinrich, University College London, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Marilena Gilca, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania
Tiedong Sun, Northeast Forestry University, China
Jing-Shuai Wu, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China
Suvranil Ghosh, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Li, Li, Zhu, Xin, Sheng, Wang, Kan and Huang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Junming Kan, kjming21@163.com; Yongsheng Huang, tusu0042@163.com
† These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.