- 1The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- 2Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- 3Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- 4The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- 5KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- 6Department of Pediatrics, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 7Research Chair for Evidence-Based Health Care and Knowledge Translation, Family and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 8Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- 9Department for Evidence-Based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Lower Austria, Austria
- 10Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis, and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- 11State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Research Group of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
by Li S, Zhang L, Wang Y, Xie R, Chen W, Lee MS, Amer YS, Sharifan A, Hussein H and Li H (2025). Front. Pharmacol. 16:1501634. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1501634
In the published article, there was an error in Affiliations 1, 2, and 10. Instead of “1Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,” “2The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China” and “10Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis, and Periodontology Department, Cairo University, Giza, Giza, Egypt,” it should be; “1The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,” “2Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China,” and “10Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis, and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: traditional chinese medicine (TCM), guidelines, good practice recommendation (GPR), methodology model, mixed method
Citation: Li S, Zhang L, Wang Y, Xie R, Chen W, Lee MS, Amer YS, Sharifan A, Hussein H and Li H (2025) Corrigendum: Development and validation a methodology model for traditional Chinese medicine good practice recommendation: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1590371. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1590371
Received: 09 March 2025; Accepted: 10 March 2025;
Published: 18 March 2025.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2025 Li, Zhang, Wang, Xie, Chen, Lee, Amer, Sharifan, Hussein and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hui Li, bGlodWl0Y21AMTI2LmNvbQ==