SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Ethnopharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1600460
This article is part of the Research TopicFood Derived Bioactive Metabolites: Unlocking their Potential Health Benefits and Medical PotentialView all 12 articles
The pharmacology and mechanism of action of Monascus purpureus Went: a scoping review
Provisionally accepted- 1Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
- 2Haihe Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
- 3KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To review the recent studies on the pharmacology and mechanism of action of Monascus purpureus Went, analyze its medicinal value, and explore the future research directions. Method: A scoping review was conducted by searching CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database, SinoMed, and PubMed, from inception until September 2024. The basic information of the included studies such as study types, disease types, main components, outcomes, and efficacy, were reviewed and summarized. Methodological quality was assessed by using the SYRCLE risk of bias assessment tool for animal studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool for clinical trials. Results: We identified 251 studies from five databases. Among them, 153 were experimental studies, 70 were reviews, and 28 were clinical trials. Among the experimental studies, molecular studies accounted for the most, totaling 80 (52%). Among the reviews, research progress accounted for the most, totaling 41 (59%). Clinical trials studied the effects of Monascus purpureus Went and its related Chinese patent medicine and preparation, with 17 (61%) using Monascus purpureus Went-related Chinese patent medicine and preparation as an intervention and 11 (39%) using Traditional Chinese Medicine Monascus purpureus Went as an intervention. In terms of methodological quality, both animal studies and clinical trials related to Monascus purpureus Went were deficient in randomized allocation sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding methods.We summarized the existing studies about the active ingredients and the effects of Monascus purpureus Went, finding that it is necessary to improve the generation of random allocation sequences and the application of the blinding method in Monascus purpureus Went-related animal studies and clinical trials. When similar studies are conducted in the future, the specific method of random assignment should be more clearly described and the application of blinding method should be used to improve the objectivity and accuracy of the studies, so as to provide reference for the selection of subsequent study directions and establish supporting evidence.
Keywords: Monascus purpureus Went, Pharmacological an effect, pharmacological mechanisms, Scope review, evidence
Received: 26 Mar 2025; Accepted: 11 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Xu, Xie, Hu, Wang, Zhang, Lee, Hu, Ang and Ji. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Haiyin Hu, Haihe Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
Lin Ang, KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Zhaochen Ji, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.