SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Ethnopharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1603861
This article is part of the Research TopicPharmacology of Natural Products against Neurodegenerative DisordersView all 14 articles
Preclinical Evidence and Potential Mechanisms of Tanshinone ⅡA on Cognitive Function in Animal Models of Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
- 2Shanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Encephalopathy, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, China
- 3National International Joint Research Center for Molecular Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, China
- 4Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Tanshinone ⅡA (Tan ⅡA) is a monomer from Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge.Animal studies have shown its potential in Alzheimer's disease (AD) cognitive protection, but overall effects remain inconclusive and the multi-mechanisms have not been systematically summarized.Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) aimed to evaluate Tan ⅡA's overall effects on AD animal cognitive function and to summarize the mechanisms. Methods: Seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biological Medical Disc, Chongqing VIP and Wanfang databases) and grey literature were retrieved. Risk of bias was evaluated following Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experiments. The mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate the effect of Tan ⅡA on cognitive function, neuropathology, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and neural/synaptic plasticity, with P < 0.05 considered as significant difference. The effect and potential mechanisms of Tan ⅡA were demonstrated by performing multiple subgroup analyses. Results: Nineteen studies involving 581 AD animals were identified. The included studies showed satisfactory reporting quality, but had certain risk of bias in methodology. Tan ⅡA ameliorated cognitive deficits, evidenced by reducing escape latency (MD = -17.94s, 95% CI: -22.92 to -12.96) and increasing time spent in the target quadrant (MD = 10.69s, 95% CI: 7.32 to 14.07). It attenuated neuropathological damage by reducing Aβ plaques in Tan IIA in AD Models 4 Thioflavine-S staining (SMD = -3.46, 95% CI: -5.65 to -1.26) and increasing neuronal density in Nissl staining (SMD = 2.82, 95% CI: 2.11 to 3.52) and NeuN staining (SMD = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.71 to 4.08). Tan ⅡA also demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects through downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), and antioxidant stress properties by increasing SOD and GSH-Px while reducing ROS and MDA levels. Additionally, they exhibited anti-apoptotic effects via increasing Bcl-2/Bax ratio and decreasing Caspase-3 expression. Moreover, treatment improved neuronal/synaptic plasticity by upregulating PSD-95 and BDNF levels. Conclusion: Tan ⅡA could improve cognitive function and neuropathology through multiple mechanisms. This suggests that Tan IIA may serve as a viable candidate for the development of therapeutic strategies for AD.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, Animal Models, Cognitive Function, mechanisms, systematic review and meta-analysis
Received: 01 Apr 2025; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rong, Li, Du, Wang, Su, Zhang and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Junlong Zhang, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
Wenbin He, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Encephalopathy, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.