SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Neuropharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1624119

Effectiveness and impact of intravenous magnesium sulfate in spinal surgery systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Zhaoguo  JinZhaoguo Jin*jianyong  zhaojianyong zhao
  • Department of Anesthesia, First People's Hospital of Linping District, Hangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background:Effective pain management following spinal surgery is crucial for preventing complications related to delayed mobilization. Magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄) has shown promise as an analgesic agent, influencing neurotransmitter modulation and autonomic nervous system regulation. However, studies evaluating its effectiveness and safety in spinal surgery remain inconsistent, necessitating a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess its role.Objective:This study hypothesized that intravenous magnesium sulfate reduces postoperative pain intensity compared to standard therapies in spinal surgery patients. The primary outcome was pain intensity assessed via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24 hours postoperatively.Methods:The meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (registration number: PROSPERO CRD42023285163). We performed data extraction and analysis using Review Manager version 5.4. The study population included patients undergoing spinal surgery, with the intervention group receiving intravenous magnesium sulfate at varying dosages or in combination with other agents. The comparison group received either a placebo or alternative treatments. Primary outcomes included pain intensity, opioid consumption, and safety parameters.Results:Ten randomized controlled trials involving 641 patients were included. Magnesium sulfate significantly reduced pain scores at 24 hours (MD −0.18, 95% CI: −0.34 to −0.02, I²=0%) compared to controls, reflecting homogeneous results. Secondary outcomes included reduced opioid consumption (SMD −0.34, 95% CI: −0.70 to −0.03, I²=71%) and muscle relaxant usage (SMD −0.91, 95% CI: −1.93 to −0.10, I²=92%), though the latter showed substantial heterogeneity, likely due to varying surgical techniques and magnesium dosages across studies. Hemodynamic parameters remained comparable between groups.Conclusion:Intravenous magnesium sulfate demonstrated significant benefits in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption, while also improving verbal response and orientation. These findings suggest that magnesium sulfate may serve as a valuable adjunct in the perioperative management of spinal surgery patients. Further research is required to confirm these results and establish optimal dosing protocols.

Keywords: Magnesium Sulfate, spinal surgery, Meta-analysis, Intravenous (i.v.), Systematic review

Received: 07 May 2025; Accepted: 28 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jin and zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhaoguo Jin, Department of Anesthesia, First People's Hospital of Linping District, Hangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.