Abstract
Salt sensitivity is a well-recognized contributor to cardiovascular risk, traditionally linked to elevated blood pressure. However, emerging evidence suggests that high dietary sodium may also promote myocardial fibrosis through non-hemodynamic mechanisms, including the activation of redox-sensitive and profibrotic pathways. Despite growing mechanistic insights, the connection between salt sensitivity and myocardial fibrosis remains underexplored, particularly in human studies. This review synthesizes current experimental and translational evidence linking dietary salt intake to myocardial fibrosis, with a focus on molecular signaling cascades, tissue sodium compartmentalization, and the clinical implications of salt-sensitive physiology. We discuss the relevance of these mechanisms to the development of diastolic dysfunction and their potential contribution to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In addition, we highlight findings from animal models and the emerging application of sodium magnetic resonance imaging (23Na-MRI) as a novel imaging tool for visualizing myocardial sodium overload and its association with fibrotic remodeling. Finally, we explore future therapeutic strategies that extend beyond traditional antihypertensives, including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), sodium-glucose cotransport 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and sodium-modulating interventions. Together, these insights offer new opportunities for early detection and targeted treatment in salt-sensitive cardiovascular disease.
1 Introduction
Salt sensitivity is a dynamic physiological trait observed across species, including humans, whereby an individual’s blood pressure fluctuates in direct response to changes in dietary sodium (salt) intake (Weinberger, 1996; ; ; ). It is estimated that approximately 30%–50% of hypertensive individuals and a significant proportion of normotensive individuals exhibit some degree of salt sensitivity (; ; ). While the role of sodium in blood pressure regulation is well-established, emerging evidence suggests that salt sensitivity may contribute to myocardial fibrosis through mechanisms beyond blood pressure elevation (; ; ). Myocardial fibrosis, marked by excess extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, contributes to cardiac remodeling and increases the risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (; ; Schiau et al., 2021).
Animal studies have provided intriguing evidence linking salt sensitivity to myocardial fibrosis (; ; ), demonstrating that chronic high-sodium intake exacerbates collagen deposition and interstitial fibrosis in the heart. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this relationship, including inappropriate activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and altered sodium handling at the cellular level (; Sopel et al., 2011; ). Notably, in salt-sensitive individuals, aldosterone levels often remain inappropriately high despite sodium loading, a phenomenon that promotes fibroblast activation and collagen synthesis via mineralocorticoid receptor - mediated pathways (Sopel et al., 2011; ).
Beyond RAAS activation, excessive sodium intake triggers proinflammatory and profibrotic signaling cascades in the myocardium (). These include endothelial glycocalyx degradation (Sembajwe et al., 2023), and upregulation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β1) - a master regulator of fibrosis (; ; ). Additionally, chronic sodium exposure drives macrophage polarization toward an alternatively activated M2 phenotype. While M2 macrophages are primarily associated with anti-inflammation and tissue repair, persistent activation in a high-sodium environment shifts them toward a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic M1 phenotype (), ultimately contributing to myocardial fibrosis. Additionally, High sodium exposure may lead to intracellular sodium accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and activation of the NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, all of which contribute to myocardial stiffening and pathological remodeling (Pitzer et al., 2022).
Despite these insights, most of the current understanding of sodium-induced myocardial fibrosis comes from animal models (, ; Wendt et al., 2009; ; ). Human studies remain scarce, leaving a critical gap in our ability to translate these findings into clinical practice. While animal models demonstrate that sodium loading exacerbates myocardial fibrosis (Wendt et al., 2009; ), whether these mechanisms are similar in humans, particularly in salt-sensitive individuals, remains largely unknown. Moreover, traditional clinical studies often focus solely on the blood pressure effects of sodium, overlooking its direct impact on myocardial structure and fibrosis. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the relationship between salt sensitivity and myocardial fibrosis, explore the underlying molecular mechanisms, and discuss novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Given its rising prevalence and link to cardiovascular risk, understanding salt sensitivity’s role in myocardial fibrosis may inform targeted therapies and early prevention.
Novelty and rationale for studying salt sensitivity and myocardial fibrosis
Despite growing recognition of the link between salt sensitivity and myocardial fibrosis, several critical gaps remain:
1. The independent role of sodium beyond blood pressure remains unclear - Most clinical studies focus on the hemodynamic effects of sodium, but could sodium-mediated fibrosis occur even before hypertension develops?
2. Early detection remains elusive - Conventional diagnostic tools often fail to detect early fibrosis before symptomatic heart failure develops. Could novel imaging modalities such as sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging (23Na-MRI) on cardiac MRI help identify preclinical fibrosis in salt-sensitive individuals?
3. Salt-sensitive individuals may represent an under-recognized phenotype of HFpEF - Given the high prevalence of HFpEF in salt-sensitive patients, could myocardial fibrosis serve as an early predictor of HFpEF progression in this population?
4. Therapeutic strategies remain undefined - While mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and dietary sodium restriction are potential interventions, their effectiveness in reversing salt-induced fibrosis remains largely unexplored.
1.1 Pathophysiological mechanisms linking salt sensitivity and myocardial fibrosis
1.1.1 Sodium and myocardial remodeling
Sodium homeostasis is a tightly regulated physiological process, with intracellular sodium concentrations maintained at low levels (approximately 10–15 mmol/L) relative to the extracellular compartment (∼140 mmol/L) (ScienceDirect Topics, 2006). In healthy myocardium, the intracellular sodium gradient is essential for normal excitation-contraction coupling, myocardial metabolism, and cellular viability (ScienceDirect Topics, 2006).
In the setting of salt sensitivity, however, there is a dysregulation of sodium handling at the tissue level. Salt-sensitive individuals exhibit increased tissue sodium accumulation - not merely in plasma or interstitial spaces, but within glycosaminoglycan-bound reservoirs in the skin, vasculature, and myocardium, independent of volume status or extracellular edema (; Schneider et al., 2017). This sodium retention occurs without commensurate water retention, rendering it invisible to conventional imaging or hemodynamic measurements. In the myocardium, elevated intracellular sodium levels may lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, increased oxidative stress, and activation of fibrotic signaling cascades (), thus laying the groundwork for diffuse myocardial fibrosis in the absence of overt hypertrophy or volume overload.
While traditionally viewed through the lens of volume expansion and blood pressure elevation, dietary sodium exerts direct effects on the myocardium that extend beyond its hemodynamic consequences (). In salt-sensitive mammals, excessive sodium intake contributes not only to hypertension but also to subclinical cardiac remodeling (). This remodeling is increasingly recognized as a fibroinflammatory process, driven by a complex interplay between sodium accumulation, altered cellular signaling, and immune activation ().
Experimental models have shown that a high-sodium diet markedly accelerates cardiac injury through the upregulation of components of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) (), even in the absence of systemic RAAS activation. In salt-sensitive states, dietary sodium loading has been observed to stimulate cardiac expression of the (pro)renin receptor (PRR) and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) (). This occurs via local increases in prorenin, renin, and angiotensinogen - key precursors in the intratissue RAS cascade (). The binding of prorenin or renin to PRR enhances local angiotensin II production and directly initiates intracellular signaling independent of enzymatic activity, contributing to maladaptive remodeling of the heart ().
These molecular changes are accompanied by the activation of several downstream intracellular pathways, notably the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) (Zhang et al., 2024b), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) (), and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) (Zhang et al., 2003; ). Each of these pathways plays a key role in the fibrotic transformation of cardiac tissue. The activation of these pathways via the PRR and AT1R potentially contribute to myocardial fibrosis through several mechanisms such as myofibroblast differentiation and upregulation of profibrotic genes.
1.1.1.1 ERK1/2 activation
Binding of prorenin or renin to PRR initiates a cascade of intracellular signaling events that are independent of the enzymatic conversion of angiotensinogen to angiotensin I (). This ligand–receptor interaction induces conformational changes in PRR that lead to the recruitment and activation of the MAPK pathway, particularly the ERK1/2 kinases (Zhang et al., 2024b). Activation of ERK1/2 via phosphorylation has been identified as a critical step in promoting pathological cardiac remodeling through its downstream effects on profibrotic gene expression and fibroblast function (; ) (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Once phosphorylated, ERK1/2 translocates to the nucleus, where it activates several transcription factors, most notably Ets-like kinase 1 (ELK-1) (Zhang et al., 2024b) and activator protein-1 (AP-1) (Vidyasagar et al., 2012, p. 1). ELK-1 is a nuclear transcription factor belonging to the E26 transformation-specific (ETS) domain family, which is known to regulate genes involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival (). In the context of myocardial remodeling, ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation of ELK-1 enhances the transcription of genes that promote fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis (). Similarly, AP-1, formed by Jun and Fos proteins, is activated via ERK1/2 signaling and governs the expression of genes linked to inflammation, ECM remodeling, and fibrosis (Ye et al., 2014; ). Through these transcriptional programs, ERK1/2 signaling leads to the upregulation of profibrotic mediators such as TGF-β1 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), both of which further stimulate fibroblast activation and ECM deposition (; ).
Experimental studies support this mechanism. Nguyen et al. first described that PRR activation can lead to ERK1/2 phosphorylation independently of angiotensin II, establishing PRR as more than a passive binding site for prorenin (). Subsequent work has shown that high sodium and aldosterone exposure further enhance PRR expression and potentiate ERK1/2 signaling, promoting fibrotic gene expression in cardiac tissues (; Zhang et al., 2024b). In mouse models, activation of this pathway is associated with increased myocardial collagen content and stiffness, features characteristic of pathological fibrosis (). Notably, this mechanism appears to operate independently of classical AT1R signaling, as evidenced by persistent fibrosis in angiotensin II type 1a receptor knockout models exposed to aldosterone and high sodium, suggesting alternative, ERK1/2-centric routes of cardiac injury ().
Taken together, these findings illustrate how PRR-mediated ERK1/2 activation serves as a critical bridge between neurohormonal stimulation and structural cardiac remodeling as shown in Figure 1. The involvement of transcription factors such as ELK-1 and AP-1 underscores the transcriptional reprogramming that underlies fibroblast proliferation and matrix accumulation in the setting of salt-sensitivity. Understanding this pathway not only highlights the complexity of salt-induced myocardial fibrosis but also points to potential therapeutic targets beyond the conventional renin-angiotensin system.
1.1.1.2 TGF-β upregulation
Activation of PRR and AT1R enhances TGF-β expression, a central mediator of fibrosis that induces fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation and stimulates collagen synthesis, leading to increased ECM deposition (). TGF-β is a multifunctional cytokine and a master regulator of fibrosis. It orchestrates the transition of quiescent fibroblasts into activated myofibroblasts, which are the primary effector cells responsible for collagen synthesis and ECM expansion in fibrotic tissue (). Concurrently, AT1R activation by angiotensin II enhances the expression of TGF-β both directly and indirectly via reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activation, and stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines (Pendergrass et al., 2009). This creates a feedback loop where TGF-β further promotes AT1R expression and receptor sensitivity, amplifying the fibrotic response.
TGF-β exerts its canonical effects primarily through the Smad2/3 signaling axis (). Once secreted, TGF-β binds to its receptor (TGF-βRII), leading to phosphorylation of receptor-regulated Smads (Tzavlaki and Moustakas, 2020). These Smads form complexes with Smad4 and translocate into the nucleus, where they drive the transcription of key profibrotic genes such as collagen type I and III, fibronectin, and CTGF (Yang et al., 2009; ). These ECM components accumulate in the interstitial and perivascular spaces, resulting in increased myocardial stiffness, impaired compliance, and diastolic dysfunction () (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Notably, TGF-β also induces the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in cardiac fibroblasts, promoting their differentiation into myofibroblasts (; ). These cells exhibit contractile properties and resistance to apoptosis, which makes their presence persistent in fibrotic tissue. Moreover, PRR and AT1R activation have been shown to potentiate non-canonical TGF-β signaling via p38MAPK, JNK, and RhoA/ROCK pathways (; ; Qi et al., 2020; ; Zhang et al., 2024b), further amplifying the fibrotic milieu even in the presence of TGF-β-independent stimuli.
Research has shown that chronic administration of angiotensin II induces TGF-β1 protein expression in the myocardium (), which plays a pivotal role in myocardial fibrosis by promoting fibroblast proliferation and ECM deposition. On the other hand, mice lacking angiotensin II type 1a receptor or treated with AT1R blockers such as losartan show reduced cardiac fibrosis, not solely due to blood pressure lowering, but due to attenuated TGF-β-mediated profibrotic signaling (Spurney et al., 2011). However, in some models, aldosterone and sodium together still induce fibrosis even when angiotensin II type 1a receptor is genetically deleted (). This suggests that PRR-TGF-β signaling can operate independently of AT1R under certain conditions, possibly via ERK1/2 pathways.
Overall, the coordinated upregulation of AT1R and TGF-β in response to PRR and angiotensin II stimulation creates a robust profibrotic network within the myocardium. This not only drives collagenous ECM accumulation, but also alters cellular phenotype of cardiac fibroblasts, contributing to the structural and functional deterioration characteristic of salt-sensitive hypertensive heart disease.
1.1.1.3 p38MAPK activation
Activation of the p38MAPK pathway is a well-characterized cellular response to stress stimuli, including oxidative stress, mechanical stretch, and proinflammatory cytokines (). These are all prevalent in the setting of salt-sensitive hypertension and RAAS overactivation. Both PRR and AT1R activation have been shown to stimulate p38MAPK signaling (Stockand and Meszaros, 2003; ; ), making this pathway a critical node in the convergence of hemodynamic, hormonal, and inflammatory insults that promote myocardial fibrosis (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3
Upon activation by prorenin or Angiotensin II, PRR and AT1R engage intracellular signaling cascades involving redox-sensitive pathways. These include NADPH oxidase-derived ROS generation, which modulates kinase activity, particularly through the activation of upstream MAP kinase regulators like MKK3/6, culminating in the phosphorylation of p38MAPK and propagation of fibrotic and inflammatory responses (; ; ). This leads to amplified downstream pathways that mediate vascular inflammation, hypertrophy, and fibrosis. Once activated, p38MAPK translocate into the nucleus and phosphorylates a range of transcription factors, including ATF-2, Elk-1, and components of the AP-1 complex (e.g., Fos, Jun) (; ; Zhang and LIU, 2002; ; Zhang et al., 2024b). These transcription factors then upregulate genes involved in both inflammation and fibrosis. Notably, p38MAPK activation leads to enhanced expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (; Zhang et al., 2024b), which act locally to further recruit immune cells and perpetuate tissue injury.
From a fibrotic standpoint, p38MAPK signaling also promotes the expression of CTGF (), a key downstream mediator of TGF-β1, resulting in increased ECM deposition. Interestingly, p38MAPK not only works in tandem with TGF-β signaling but can also function independently to drive fibrotic gene expression (Stockand and Meszaros, 2003; ; ; Zhang et al., 2024b), especially under conditions of mechanical stress or oxidative injury. Additionally, p38MAPK activation supports the differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts (), which are central to the development and maintenance of fibrotic lesions (Figure 3).
Experimental studies have supported these mechanisms. In a mouse model of myocardial infarction, selective inhibition of p38MAPK significantly improved cardiac function and reduced fibrosis, with effects comparable to ACE inhibition - highlighting p38MAPK as a key driver of post-infarction remodeling (). Likewise, SB203580, a potent p38MAPK inhibitor, reduces the profibrotic fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition associated with asthma, indicating its potential in mitigating fibrosis (). Further evidence from salt-loading models demonstrates that dietary sodium can activate both p38 and ERK1/2 MAPK cascades via a tetraethylammonium (TEA)-sensitive pathway (Ying and Sanders, 2002), promoting glomerular TGF-β1 and NOS3 expression - effects that were significantly attenuated by MAPK inhibitors SB203580 and PD-098059. This effect reinforces the salt-sensitive physiology associated with this profibrotic pathway.
Importantly, activation of p38MAPK also induces mitochondrial dysfunction and increases ROS production (), which further amplifies redox-sensitive profibrotic signaling loops. In this context, p38MAPK serves not only as a mediator of immediate stress responses but also as a chronic driver of structural myocardial remodeling. The crosstalk between PRR, AT1R, and p38MAPK therefore represents a potent signaling triad in the pathogenesis of myocardial fibrosis, with implications for early intervention and targeted therapy.
Collectively, these molecular events initiated by a high-sodium diet and mediated through PRR and AT1R activation culminate in myocardial fibrosis, characterized by excessive deposition of ECM components, disruption of normal cardiac architecture, and impairment of cardiac function. Understanding these pathways provides insights into how dietary sodium influences cardiac remodeling resulting in conditions such as HFpEF and highlights potential therapeutic targets for preventing salt-induced cardiac damage.
1.1.2 Clinical heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes and their overlap with salt sensitivity
HFpEF is now widely acknowledged as a heterogeneous syndrome rather than a uniform disease entity. Recent phenomapping studies (Shah et al., 2015; ; ) have identified several distinct clinical subtypes of HFpEF. One of the most compelling observations from recent HFpEF research is the recognition of distinct clinical phenotypes, several of which exhibit pathophysiological features that significantly overlap with salt sensitivity (; ; ; ; ; Sotomi et al., 2021; ; ; Zhang et al., 2024a). Among these include, the obese-inflammatory HFpEF phenotype (), hypertensive aging HFpEF phenotype (; Zhang et al., 2024a), renal dysfunction-driven phenotype (), and the female predominant HFpEF phenotype (Sotomi et al., 2021). These phenotypes offer a clinically meaningful framework for understanding the heterogeneity of HFpEF and provide a basis for mechanistic exploration. In the following section, we examine each phenotype in detail, highlighting shared and distinct pathways, particularly those intersecting with salt sensitivity and myocardial fibrosis.
1.1.2.1 Obese-inflammatory HFpEF phenotype
This subtype, is characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and systemic oxidative stress (; Verma et al., 2024). These same pathways are central to the salt-sensitive state, where excessive sodium intake or retention enhances adipose tissue inflammation and further activates mineralocorticoid receptors (; ; Pitzer et al., 2022), even in normotensive individuals, creating a convergence of metabolic and ionic stressors that accelerate fibrotic myocardial remodeling. Animal studies have demonstrated that salt loading in obese models accelerates myocardial fibrosis and impairs diastolic function, underscoring the biological plausibility of this overlap ().
Adipose tissue, particularly visceral fat, is not merely a storage depot but a metabolically active organ that secretes pro-inflammatory adipokines such as leptin, resistin, and TNF-α, while downregulating protective factors like adiponectin (; ). These shifts promote a systemic inflammatory milieu characterized by IL-6 and C-reactive protein, which are both independent predictors of diastolic dysfunction (). Simultaneously, obesity impairs endothelial nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability through increased oxidative stress, mediated by NADPH oxidase-derived ROS (; Soták et al., 2025). This endothelial dysfunction leads to microvascular rarefaction, limiting myocardial perfusion and creating a hypoxic environment that activates fibrotic signaling cascades, such as TNF-α and TGF-β1 () as demonstrated in Figure 4.
FIGURE 4
In obese individuals, salt retention is exacerbated by RAAS overactivation, enhanced aldosterone secretion, and resistance to natriuretic peptides (; ). Excess sodium is stored in interstitial compartments - particularly in skin, muscle, and potentially myocardium - via glycosaminoglycan-bound reservoirs, in a process that bypasses osmotic regulation (Sulyok et al., 2022; Sembajwe et al., 2023). This non-osmotic sodium storage triggers macrophage activation and promotes further inflammatory and fibrotic remodeling (Sulyok et al., 2022). Notably, mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation in the setting of high sodium and leptin levels has been shown to upregulate profibrotic gene expression in cardiac fibroblasts, leading to cardiac fibrosis, the hallmark substrate of HFpEF (; ; ).
Taken together, the obese-inflammatory HFpEF phenotype and salt sensitivity appear to be mutually reinforcing pathophysiological states, each amplifying the myocardial substrate for diastolic dysfunction. The identification of this interplay has significant clinical implications. Therapies targeting both metabolic inflammation and sodium handling - such as low-sodium diets, MRAs, SGLT2 inhibitors (), and potentially anti-inflammatory agents - may offer particular benefit in this subgroup. Importantly, early identification through advanced imaging or biomarker profiling in high-risk individuals could facilitate preemptive interventions, preventing progression to overt HFpEF.
1.1.2.2 Hypertensive-aging HFpEF phenotype
The hypertensive-aging HFpEF phenotype represents a clinically and mechanistically distinct subgroup, predominantly affecting older adults with increased arterial stiffness and concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling (Samson et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2024a). Aging is a well-established driver of both HFpEF and salt sensitivity, owing to cumulative alterations in renal, vascular, and neurohormonal regulation (). Age-related nephron loss, diminished baroreflex sensitivity, and reduced responsiveness to natriuretic peptides impair the kidney’s ability to excrete sodium, thereby enhancing salt-induced volume expansion and pressure lability () (Figure 4). These ionic and hemodynamic perturbations promote subclinical myocardial remodeling, typified by increased LV stiffness and impaired relaxation (Samson et al., 2016). Indeed, studies in elderly salt-sensitive individuals have documented early evidence of LV remodeling - particularly concentric hypertrophy and increased relative wall thickness - even in the setting of preserved ejection fraction, structural changes that are characteristic of the early HFpEF phenotype ().
Complementing these cardiac changes are vascular alterations intrinsic to aging. A progressive increase in arterial stiffness, driven by degradation of elastin, collagen cross-linking, and accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) (Zieman et al., 2005; Samson et al., 2016; ), leads to widened pulse pressure and augmented systolic load. These changes amplify early wave reflections, increasing myocardial workload and compromising coronary perfusion during diastole (; ). Importantly, arterial stiffness is not merely a correlate but an independent predictor of HFpEF, and is consistently high in HFpEF patients (; ). Furthermore, chronic activation of neurohormonal pathways - including angiotensin II, aldosterone, and endothelin - along with systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, fosters myocardial fibrosis through ECM remodeling and endothelial dysfunction (; ; ). This pathophysiologic convergence of aging, salt sensitivity, and arterial stiffening provides a mechanistic explanation for the high prevalence and unique characteristics of HFpEF in the elderly population.
1.1.2.3 Renal dysfunction-driven HFpEF phenotype
The renal dysfunction-driven HFpEF phenotype is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical and pathophysiological subgroup, characterized by impaired natriuresis, fluid retention, and uremia-induced vascular injury (). In individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), reduced glomerular filtration and diminished sodium excretory capacity promote chronic volume overload, a key driver of elevated LV filling pressures and diastolic dysfunction (; ). Notably, salt sensitivity shares this fundamental natriuretic defect, and the two conditions frequently coexist, especially in older adults and those with comorbid hypertension or diabetes (; ).
Recent advances in imaging, particularly sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging (23Na-MRI), have provided direct evidence of interstitial sodium accumulation in CKD patients, even in the absence of overt volume overload (Schneider et al., 2017; Qirjazi et al., 2020; ). This sodium retention is not simply intravascular but occurs within glycosaminoglycan-bound tissue compartments in the skin, muscle, and potentially myocardium (Schneider et al., 2017; Qirjazi et al., 2020; ). In both CKD and salt-sensitive individuals, such non-osmotic sodium storage acts as a stimulus for macrophage activation, oxidative stress, and the release of pro-fibrotic mediators (). The cumulative effect is diffuse myocardial fibrosis, impaired LV compliance, and the progression toward the HFpEF phenotype.
Moreover, CKD is associated with uremia-related endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness, and impaired NO signaling - factors that further compromise coronary microvascular function and contribute to ventricular-vascular uncoupling (). In parallel, salt-sensitive individuals exhibit enhanced MR signaling and blunted natriuretic peptide responsiveness, both of which exacerbate sodium retention and myocardial remodeling (; ). Together, these overlapping features reinforce the view that the renal HFpEF phenotype and salt sensitivity share common molecular and hemodynamic pathways, centered around impaired sodium homeostasis, systemic inflammation, and myocardial fibrosis.
This mechanistic link is supported by data from Schneider et al. (2017), who used 23Na-MRI in a cohort of patients with mild to moderate CKD. The study found a strong positive correlation between skin sodium content, systolic blood pressure, and LV mass, independent of total body water and blood pressure control. These findings suggest that tissue sodium accumulation may drive myocardial remodeling via mechanisms unrelated to classical hemodynamic load, reinforcing the concept that sodium dysregulation itself contributes to the structural underpinnings of HFpEF. In this context, CKD and salt sensitivity appear to represent converging biological states, both predisposing to myocardial fibrosis, impaired compliance, and the evolution of HFpEF.
1.1.2.4 Female-predominant HFpEF phenotype
Lastly, the female-predominant HFpEF phenotype is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity, particularly prevalent among postmenopausal women, who comprise a disproportionate share of HFpEF cases globally (Sotomi et al., 2021; Teramoto et al., 2022). This phenotype is tightly linked to the decline in estrogen levels following menopause, which alters vascular and renal physiology in ways that heighten salt sensitivity. Estrogen normally promotes natriuresis, enhances endothelial function, and attenuates sympathetic tone; its loss leads to increased vascular resistance, reduced NO bioavailability, and enhanced sodium retention (Schulman et al., 2006; ) (Figure 4). As a result, postmenopausal women exhibit greater susceptibility to volume shifts and pressure overload, despite normotensive profiles in clinical settings (Schulman et al., 2006; ; ). These structural and functional alterations occur without overt changes in systolic function, often eluding early detection by conventional diagnostic approaches. Additionally, the volume shifts also have potential to cause disproportionate rise in filling pressures, and might lead to symptomatic limitation even in the absence of overt congestion ().
Some imaging studies reveal disproportionately high myocardial remodeling and fibrosis burden in women (), reflecting early structural changes that often precede overt functional decline and remain undetected by conventional diagnostic modalities. In some cases, women present with exertional dyspnea, preserved ejection fraction, and subtle hemodynamic abnormalities that belie the underlying myocardial remodeling (). These findings align with other studies showing that salt-sensitive women - even without overt hypertension - are at greater risk of developing diastolic dysfunction and progressing to HFpEF (). This risk is further amplified by sex-specific differences in cardiac energetics, inflammatory signaling, and vascular stiffness, all of which worsen in the setting of sodium overload ().
Taken together, these overlapping phenotypes highlight the importance of considering salt sensitivity as more than a trait of blood pressure regulation. Rather, it appears to function as a trans-diagnostic modifier that exacerbates myocardial fibrosis and dysfunction across multiple HFpEF subtypes. Recognizing and stratifying this intersection could enhance both early detection and targeted management strategies, especially in demographic groups disproportionately affected by both conditions.
1.1.3 Advanced imaging: bridging salt-induced myocardial pathophysiology with early clinical detection
The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying salt sensitivity culminate in a progressive, insidious accumulation of diffuse interstitial fibrosis. As noted earlier, these myocardial changes often occur in the absence of overt hypertension or structural heart disease, where cardiac remodeling is driven by complex inflammatory pathways and neurohormonal alterations rather than pressure overload alone (; ; Sopel et al., 2011).
Despite emerging evidence linking salt sensitivity to myocardial fibrosis, the clinical identification of these early fibrotic changes remains a substantial challenge. Conventional diagnostic modalities such as echocardiography and electrocardiography, while useful in evaluating global cardiac function, lack the sensitivity to detect subtle interstitial changes in the ECM (), particularly in the preclinical stages of myocardial remodeling. As a result, many at-risk individuals progress undetected, only to present later with irreversible myocardial damage or symptomatic heart failure.
This diagnostic gap underscores the urgent need for imaging modalities that align more closely with the biological underpinnings of salt-induced myocardial injury. Advanced imaging techniques - specifically T1 mapping on cardiac MRI and the emerging use of sodium 23Na-MRI - offer the potential to non-invasively detect diffuse myocardial fibrosis at a stage when intervention may still be both feasible and effective (; ).
These technologies represent a critical evolution in cardiovascular imaging, enabling the visualization and quantification of myocardial changes that were previously confined to histological evaluation. In doing so, they serve not merely as diagnostic tools but as translational bridges - linking subclinical myocardial pathology to actionable clinical insight in salt-sensitive populations.
1.1.3.1 23Na-MRI: a glimpse into ionic pathobiology and its role in early myocardial fibrosis detection
23Na-MRI offers a unique capability to noninvasively visualize and quantify sodium distribution within biological tissues (; ). Unlike conventional proton (1H) MRI, which provides anatomical and functional data based on water content, 23Na-MRI leverages the magnetic properties of the sodium-23 nucleus (; ). Due to its lower gyromagnetic ratio and abundance, 23Na MRI requires high-field strength systems (≥3T) and specialized radiofrequency coils to achieve adequate signal-to-noise ratios (; ). Additionally, tailored imaging sequences, such as 3D radial or twisted projection imaging, are necessary to capture signals from this rapidly relaxing nucleus (). Though the spatial resolution of 23Na-MRI is lower than that of standard MRI, it is sufficient for mapping sodium concentrations in key compartments including the myocardium, skeletal muscle, and skin (). This modality provides insight into ionic homeostasis and allows for the distinction between osmotic and non-osmotic sodium storage - an especially relevant feature in salt-sensitive cardiovascular pathology. In clinical studies, hypertensive patients show significantly higher sodium content than normotensive controls, independent of water content - suggesting the presence of water-free sodium storage. These findings, as demonstrated by , support the role of tissue sodium deposition as an early marker of salt-sensitive hypertension and highlight the translational potential of sodium imaging for cardiovascular risk stratification.
However, although sodium imaging offers valuable molecular insight into sodium retention and myocardial fibrosis, its standalone clinical utility remains limited by technical and biological factors, for example, its inability to delineate infarcted regions (). Nonetheless, its relevance is enhanced when combined with high-resolution techniques such as T1 mapping () and complementary biomarker panels, which together enable a more comprehensive assessment of myocardial remodeling. When integrated with T1 mapping, 23Na-MRI facilitates a more complete characterization of both ionic and structural changes, which may be particularly relevant in salt-sensitive HFpEF phenotypes.
Though still in the investigational phase,
23Na-MRI may still have profound implications:
• Risk stratification: Identifying individuals with silent sodium overload and early fibrotic remodeling, well before symptoms emerge.
• Therapeutic monitoring: Evaluating the response to low-sodium dietary interventions, MRAs, ARBs, or SGLT2 inhibitors.
• Comparative effectiveness: Complementary use with T1 mapping may offer a comprehensive assessment of myocardial ionic, structural, and extracellular matrix changes.
Therefore, 23Na-MRI offers an unprecedented window into early-stage, pre-symptomatic myocardial pathology, particularly in populations with high salt sensitivity, laying the groundwork for individualized cardiovascular risk profiling and preventive therapy.
1.1.4 Therapeutic strategies for salt-induced myocardial fibrosis: An evolving frontier
Despite growing recognition of salt sensitivity as a key contributor to myocardial fibrosis and HFpEF pathogenesis, therapeutic strategies specifically targeting salt-induced myocardial remodeling remain poorly defined. While several pharmacologic and lifestyle interventions are biologically plausible and have demonstrated benefits in broader HFpEF populations, their efficacy in reversing or halting salt-driven myocardial fibrosis has not been rigorously established.
1.1.4.1 Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists
MRAs include both steroidal agents, such as spironolactone and eplerenone, and newer nonsteroidal agents such as finerenone (). Steroidal MRAs have shown modest clinical benefit in HFpEF in select subgroups, particularly those with elevated natriuretic peptides and evidence of fibrosis or diastolic dysfunction (; Sethi et al., 2024). Mechanistically, they mitigate aldosterone-driven sodium retention, inflammation, and myocardial fibrosis, supporting their relevance in salt-sensitive individuals (; ; ). Preclinical models demonstrate that MR blockade attenuates salt-induced cardiac hypertrophy and collagen deposition (Rickard et al., 2012). However, human trials such as TOPCAT reported mixed results, with regional variability in response and no definitive impact on reversing cardiac fibrosis (Pitt et al., 2014).
In contrast, finerenone, a nonsteroidal MRA with greater receptor selectivity and anti-inflammatory properties, has shown encouraging results in HFpEF and heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) populations (). In the FINEARTS-HF trial (2025), those who were enrolled within 1 week of a worsening heart failure event experienced a 26% relative reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death or recurrent decompensation with finerenone compared to placebo. A 21% risk reduction was also observed in patients enrolled within 3 months of a prior event. Importantly, these benefits were achieved without excess adverse events, suggesting that finerenone may be particularly effective in higher-risk patients during this early vulnerable period. However, as the trial did not stratify participants by salt sensitivity, the extent to which sodium-related mechanisms contributed to these benefits remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.
1.1.4.2 Angiotensin receptor blockers
ARBs have been recognized for their efficacy in reducing afterload and preventing adverse cardiac remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (). Recent evidence, however, suggests that their utility extends to patients with HFpEF, particularly those exhibiting salt-sensitive pathophysiology. Mechanistically, ARBs attenuate angiotensin II–mediated vasoconstriction, sodium retention, and fibrotic signaling cascades, including suppression of TGF-β (Tokuda et al., 2004; ). In animal models of pressure overload, subdepressor doses of candesartan reduced perivascular and interstitial fibrosis independent of blood pressure effects, primarily by downregulating monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and TGF-β expression (Tokuda et al., 2004). Complementing these findings, demonstrated in diabetic patients with early nephropathy that valsartan reduced salt sensitivity of blood pressure by restoring renal NO synthesis. The result of this was enhanced endothelial function, and lower oxidative stress - mechanisms closely linked to myocardial remodeling (). In a clinical context, another study reported that ARB use in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was independently associated with reduced late gadolinium enhancement (LGE%) on cardiac MRI, indicating decreased myocardial fibrosis (). Moreover, in a preclinical study by , the combination of sacubitril/valsartan directly inhibited cardiac fibroblast activation and collagen deposition via restoration of protein kinase G signaling and inhibition of Rho-mediated myofibroblast transition. These converging lines of evidence support the potential of ARBs not only to reduce blood pressure but also to mitigate salt-driven myocardial fibrosis through pleiotropic effects on fibroinflammatory signaling and tissue remodeling. Despite these promising findings, clinical trials have yet to stratify HFpEF patients by salt sensitivity, leaving an important gap in translating these mechanistic benefits into precision-guided therapy.
1.1.4.3 SGLT2 inhibitors
SGLT2 inhibitors have emerged as a cornerstone therapy in HFpEF, demonstrating consistent improvements in heart failure outcomes across trials such as EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER (; Solomon et al., 2022). Their mechanisms extend beyond glycemic control, involving natriuresis, osmotic diuresis, reduced inflammation, and improved mitochondrial function (Wan et al., 2020; Yau et al., 2022). These properties suggest a theoretical benefit in salt-sensitive patients, where sodium and fluid handling are central to disease progression (). However, there is no direct evidence to date that SGLT2 inhibitors reverse myocardial fibrosis, and their effects on sodium storage in non-osmotic tissue compartments (e.g., skin or myocardium) remain unexplored. Furthermore, most major trials did not assess or stratify participants by salt sensitivity, fibrosis burden, or non-osmotic sodium retention, limiting insights into disease-specific reversibility (; Solomon et al., 2022).
1.1.4.4 Dietary sodium restriction
Dietary sodium restriction is an intuitive and mechanistically sound intervention in salt-sensitive hypertension and HFpEF, especially considering the well-established role of sodium overload in promoting myocardial fibrosis. Small trials have demonstrated that lower sodium intake can reduce arterial stiffness, filling pressures, and oxidative stress in hypertensive HFpEF patients (). However, whether sodium restriction can reverse established myocardial fibrosis remains uncertain. In salt-sensitive individuals, tissue sodium is often non-osmotically stored in glycosaminoglycan-bound interstitial compartments, and may not be readily mobilized through acute dietary changes alone (Sulyok et al., 2022; ). The recently published SODIUM-HF trial () adds further nuance to this discussion. In this international randomized trial of ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure, a structured dietary sodium reduction to <1,500 mg/day did not significantly reduce the composite outcome of cardiovascular hospitalizations, emergency visits, or mortality over 12 months, compared with usual care. Despite successful sodium reduction in the intervention group, clinical events were not meaningfully different (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.63–1.26; p = 0.53), suggesting that sodium restriction may not confer universal benefit in a heterogeneous heart failure population. These findings highlight the need for a phenotype-specific approach, as patients with demonstrable salt sensitivity and evidence of sodium-driven fibrotic remodeling may derive greater benefit. Long-term adherence, variability in salt responsiveness, and the complexity of tissue sodium dynamics continue to pose challenges to broad implementation. As such, sodium restriction may remain a supportive rather than standalone strategy in the management of myocardial fibrosis in HFpEF.
1.1.4.5 The unmet need: targeted antifibrotic therapies
While the above therapies offer pathway-specific benefits, none are explicitly designed to reverse salt-induced myocardial fibrosis. Novel antifibrotic agents, such as galectin-3 inhibitors (), TGF-β modulators, and anti-inflammatory compounds targeting macrophage activation (; ), are under investigation in other fibrotic conditions and may hold promise for cardiovascular application. Targeting the p38MAPK pathway has also shown promise in attenuating myocardial fibrosis in experimental models, with selective inhibitors such as SB203580 and PD-098059 demonstrating reductions in collagen deposition and improved cardiac function independent of blood pressure control (Ying and Sanders, 2002; ; ). Similarly, non-pharmacologic strategies such as structured low-sodium dietary interventions, combined with biomarker-guided therapy, could represent future precision-based approaches.
2 Conclusion
Salt-sensitivity represents a unique cardiovascular phenotype where excessive sodium intake leads to blood pressure elevation and myocardial fibrosis through both hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic pathways. The interplay between PRR and AT1R, and downstream mediators such as p38MAPK and TGF-β, provides a mechanistic framework for understanding how ionic imbalance, immune activation, and fibrotic signaling converge to drive adverse cardiac remodeling. Importantly, this fibrotic cascade may be activated even in the absence of overt hypertension, challenging traditional diagnostic paradigms. Innovative imaging tools such as 23Na-MRI with T1 mapping offer noninvasive windows into myocardial sodium handling and tissue composition, revealing early fibrotic changes that escape detection by standard modalities. Therapeutically, MRAs, ARBs, SGLT 2 inhibitors, and phenotypic-specific sodium modulation collectively offer a multifaceted strategy to attenuate myocardial fibrosis in salt-sensitive individuals and should be prioritized in phenotype-directed management.
2.1 What is known?
• Salt sensitivity is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and hypertension-related morbidity.
• High dietary sodium contributes to blood pressure elevation, particularly in salt-sensitive individuals.
• Myocardial fibrosis is a key pathological substrate in cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction.
• Traditional assessment of salt sensitivity relies on blood pressure response, with limited insight into tissue-level changes.
2.2 What is new?
• Salt-sensitive myocardial fibrosis may occur independently of blood pressure changes, via molecular and redox-sensitive mechanisms.
• High sodium intake activates MAPK pathways and promotes fibrotic gene expression, even in the absence of hypertension.
• Tissue sodium overload may contribute to early myocardial stiffening and fibrosis, potentially leading to HFpEF.
• 23Na-MRI enables noninvasive visualization of myocardial sodium accumulation, distinguishing osmotic from non-osmotic sodium storage.
• Emerging therapies targeting sodium compartmentalization and downstream fibrotic signaling offer novel treatment avenues beyond BP control.
Statements
Author contributions
KM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis, Project administration, Validation. ON: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis. AK: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Validation. SM: Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing, Visualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the Fogarty International Center, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National institute on aging of the National Institutes of Health grants R01HL144941 (AK), 2D43TW009744 (KM and SM), R21TW012635 (AK and SM), and the American Heart Association Award Number 24IVPHA1297559 https://doi.org/10.58275/AHA.24IVPHA1297559.pc.gr.193866 (AK and SM).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Author disclaimer
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association.
References
1
AfolabiJ.LafferC. L.BeasleyH. K.HintonA.MasengaS. K.KiraboA. (2024). Salt sensitivity of blood pressure. Circulation Res.134 (10), 1234–1239. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.322982
2
AkbariA.McIntyreC. W. (2023). Recent advances in sodium magnetic resonance imaging and its future role in kidney disease. J. Clin. Med.12 (13), 4381. 10.3390/jcm12134381
3
AkshayS.DesaiM. D.Muthiah VaduganathanM. D.BrianL.ClaggettP.IanJ.et al (2025). Finerenone in patients with a recent worsening heart failure event: the FINEARTS-HF trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.85, 106–116. [Preprint]. 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.09.004
4
AlGhatrifM.WangM.FedorovaO. V.BagrovA. Y.LakattaE. G. (2017). The pressure of aging. Med. Clin. N. Am.101 (1), 81–101. 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.08.006
5
Ambale-VenkateshB.LimaJ. A. C. (2015). Cardiac MRI: a central prognostic tool in myocardial fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.12 (1), 18–29. 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.159
6
AnkerS. D.ButlerJ.GerasimosF.FerreiraJ. P.EdimarB.MichaelB.et al (2021). Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N. Engl. J. Med.385 (16), 1451–1461. 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038
7
AoyamaK.KomatsuY.YonedaM.NakanoS.AshikawaS.KawaiY.et al (2020). Alleviation of salt-induced exacerbation of cardiac, renal, and visceral fat pathology in rats with metabolic syndrome by surgical removal of subcutaneous fat. Nutr. and Diabetes10 (1), 28. 10.1038/s41387-020-00132-1
8
Averill-BatesD. (2024). Reactive oxygen species and cell signaling. Review. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Res.1871 (2), 119573. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2023.119573
9
AzizF.TkL.-A.EnweluzoC.DuttaS.ZaeemM. (2013). Diastolic heart failure: a concise review. J. Clin. Med. Res.5 (5), 327–334. 10.4021/jocmr1532w
10
BaileyM. A.DhaunN. (2024). Salt sensitivity: causes, consequences, and recent advances. Hypertension81 (3), 476–489. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.17959
11
BakalenkoN.KuznetsovaE.MalashichevaA. (2024). The complex interplay of TGF-β and notch signaling in the pathogenesis of fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.25 (19), 10803. 10.3390/ijms251910803
12
Barrera-ChimalJ.BonnardB.JaisserF. (2022). Roles of mineralocorticoid receptors in cardiovascular and cardiorenal diseases. Annu. Rev. Physiology84, 585–610. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-060821-013950
13
BiernackaA.DobaczewskiM.FrangogiannisN. G. (2011). TGF-β signaling in fibrosis. Growth Factors29 (5), 196–202. 10.3109/08977194.2011.595714
14
BonfioliG. B.PagnesiM.CalòL.MetraM. (2025). Towards a phenotype profiling of the patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur. Heart J. Suppl.27 (Suppl 1), i115–i121. 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae095
15
BorderW. A.NobleN. A. (1998). Interactions of transforming growth factor-β and angiotensin II in renal fibrosis. Hypertension31 (1), 181–188. 10.1161/01.HYP.31.1.181
16
BottomleyP. A. (2016). Sodium MRI in human heart: a review. NMR Biomed.29 (2), 187–196. 10.1002/nbm.3265
17
BouffetteS.BotezI.De CeuninckF. (2023). Targeting galectin-3 in inflammatory and fibrotic diseases. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.44 (8), 519–531. 10.1016/j.tips.2023.06.001
18
BuffoloF.TettiM.MulateroP.MonticoneS. (2022). Aldosterone as a mediator of cardiovascular damage. Hypertension79 (9), 1899–1911. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.17964
19
BurkeR. M.LighthouseJ. K.MickelsenD. M.SmallE. M. (2019). Sacubitril/valsartan decreases cardiac fibrosis in left ventricle pressure overload by restoring PKG signaling in cardiac fibroblasts. Circ. Heart Fail.12, e005565, [Preprint]. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005565
20
BusebeeB.GhusnW.CifuentesL.AcostaA. (2023). Obesity: a review of pathophysiology and classification. Mayo Clin. Proc.98 (12), 1842–1857. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.05.026
21
CampbellS. E.KatwaL. C. (1997). Angiotensin II stimulated expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 in cardiac fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.29 (7), 1947–1958. 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0435
22
ChatzifrangkeskouM.Le DourC.WuW.MorrowJ.JosephL.BeuvinM.et al (2016). ERK1/2 directly acts on CTGF/CCN2 expression to mediate myocardial fibrosis in cardiomyopathy caused by mutations in the lamin A/C gene. Hum. Mol. Genet.25 (11), 2220–2233. 10.1093/hmg/ddw090
23
ChristaM.DithmarF.WeinausT.KohlhaasM.Arias-LozaA.-P.HofmannM.et al (2024). A new approach to characterize cardiac sodium storage by combining fluorescence photometry and magnetic resonance imaging in small animal research. Sci. Rep.14 (1), 2426. 10.1038/s41598-024-52377-w
24
CiullaM.PaliottiR.HessD. B.TjahjaE.CampbellS. E.MagriniF.et al (1997). Echocardiographic patterns of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive patients: endomyocardial biopsy versus ultrasonic tissue characterization. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.10 (6), 657–664. 10.1016/S0894-7317(97)70028-2
25
da CunhaR. S.SantosA. F.BarretoF. C.StinghenA. E. M. (2020). How do uremic toxins affect the endothelium?Toxins12 (6), 412. 10.3390/toxins12060412
26
DíezJ.GonzálezA.KovacicJ. C. (2020). Myocardial interstitial fibrosis in nonischemic heart disease, Part 3/4: JACC focus seminar. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.75 (17), 2204–2218. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.019
27
DingY.WangY.ZhangW.JiaQ.WangX.LiY.et al (2020). Roles of biomarkers in myocardial fibrosis. Aging Dis.11 (5), 1157–1174. 10.14336/AD.2020.0604
28
DuJ.LiuJ.WangX.WangX.MaY.ZhangS.et al (2025). The role of estrogen in the sex difference for the risk factors of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Biol. Direct20 (1), 28. 10.1186/s13062-025-00618-x
29
ElboudwarejO.WeiJ.DarouianN.Cook-WiensG.LiQ.ThomsonL. E. J.et al (2018). Maladaptive left ventricular remodeling in women: an analysis from the women’s ischemia syndrome evaluation – coronary vascular dysfunction study. Int. J. Cardiol.268, 230–235. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.139
30
ElijovichF.WeinbergerM. H.AndersonC. A. M.AppelL. J.BursztynM.CookN. R.et al (2016). Salt sensitivity of blood pressure: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Hypertension68 (3), e7–e46. 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000047
31
EngeliS.BoschmannM.FringsP.BeckL.JankeJ.TitzeJ.et al (2006). Influence of salt intake on renin–angiotensin and natriuretic peptide system genes in human adipose tissue. Hypertension48 (6), 1103–1108. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000248837.88749.18
32
EzekowitzJ. A.Colin-RamirezE.RossH.EscobedoJ.MacdonaldP.TroughtonR.et al (2022). Reduction of dietary sodium to less than 100 mmol in heart failure (SODIUM-HF): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet399 (10333), 1391–1400. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00369-5
33
FehrenbachD. J.MattsonD. L. (2020). Inflammatory macrophages in the kidney contribute to salt-sensitive hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol.318 (3), F544–F548. 10.1152/ajprenal.00454.2019
34
FerreiraD. N.KatayamaI. A.OliveiraI. B.RosaK. T.FurukawaL. N. S.CoelhoM. S.et al (2010). Salt-induced cardiac hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis are due to a blood pressure–independent mechanism in wistar rats. J. Nutr.140 (10), 1742–1751. 10.3945/jn.109.117473
35
FielitzJ.HeinS.MitrovicV.PreglaR.ZurbrüggH. R.WarneckeC.et al (2001). Activation of the cardiac renin-angiotensin system and increased myocardial collagen expression in human aortic valve disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37 (5), 1443–1449. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01170-6
36
FujitaT. (2014). Mechanism of salt-sensitive hypertension: focus on adrenal and sympathetic nervous systems. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.25 (6), 1148–1155. 10.1681/ASN.2013121258
37
GangulyP.MacleodT.WongC.HarlandM.McGonagleD. (2023). Revisiting p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) in inflammatory arthritis: a narrative of the emergence of MAPK-activated protein kinase inhibitors (MK2i). Pharmaceuticals16 (9), 1286. 10.3390/ph16091286
38
GaoY.KangL.LiC.WangX.SunC.LiQ.et al (2016). Resveratrol ameliorates diabetes-induced cardiac dysfunction through AT1R-ERK/p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Cardiovasc. Toxicol.16 (2), 130–137. 10.1007/s12012-015-9321-3
39
GengC.MaoY.-C.QiS.SongK.WangH.-F.ZhangZ.et al (2023). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis focusing on the number needed to treat. Front. Cardiovasc. Med.10, 1236008. 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1236008
40
GilbertC. J.LongeneckerJ. Z.AccorneroF. (2021). ERK1/2: an integrator of signals that alters cardiac homeostasis and growth. Biology10 (4), 346. 10.3390/biology10040346
41
GreggL. P.NavaneethanS. D. (2022). Steroidal or non-steroidal MRAs: should we still enable RAASi use through K binders?Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.38 (6), 1355–1365. 10.1093/ndt/gfac284
42
GuiT.SunY.ShimokadoA.MuragakiY. (2012). The roles of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. signal Transduct.2012, 289243. 10.1155/2012/289243
43
HayakawaY.AoyamaT.YokoyamaC.OkamotoC.KomakiH.MinatoguchiS.et al (2015). High salt intake damages the heart through activation of cardiac (pro) renin receptors even at an early stage of hypertension. PLoS One10 (3), e0120453. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120453
44
HeidenreichP. A.BozkurtB.AguilarD.AllenL. A.ByunJ. J.ColvinM. M.et al (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation145 (18), e895–e1032. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063
45
HildebrandtX.IbrahimM.PeltzerN. (2023). Cell death and inflammation during obesity: “Know my methods, WAT(son)”. Cell Death and Differ.30 (2), 279–292. 10.1038/s41418-022-01062-4
46
HuB.WuZ.PhanS. H. (2003). Smad3 mediates transforming growth factor-beta-induced alpha-smooth muscle actin expression. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.29 (3 Pt 1), 397–404. 10.1165/rcmb.2003-0063OC
47
HuangY.-Q.PengK.YanJ.ChenH.-L.JiangP.-Y.DuY.-F.et al (2024). The participation of ferroptosis in fibrosis of the heart and kidney tissues in dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rats. Am. J. Hypertens.37 (10), 784–791. 10.1093/ajh/hpae076
48
HummelS. L.SeymourE. M.BrookR. D.ShethS. S.GhoshE.ZhuS.et al (2013). Low-sodium DASH diet improves diastolic function and ventricular–arterial coupling in hypertensive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ. Heart Fail.6 (6), 1165–1171. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000481
49
ImanishiM.OkadaN.KonishiY.MorikawaT.MaedaI.KitabayashiC.et al (2012). Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces salt sensitivity of blood pressure through restoration of renal nitric oxide synthesis in patients with diabetic nephropathy. J. Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst.14, 67–73. 10.1177/1470320312454764
50
ItoY.SunT.TanakaH.YamaguchiM.KinashiH.SakataF.et al (2023). Tissue sodium accumulation induces organ inflammation and injury in chronic kidney disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24 (9), 8329. 10.3390/ijms24098329
51
JanknechtR.ZinckR.ErnstW. H.NordheimA. (1994). Functional dissection of the transcription factor Elk-1. Oncogene9 (4), 1273–1278.
52
KagiyamaS.MatsumuraK.FukuharaM.SakagamiK.FujiiK.IidaM. (2007). Aldosterone-and-Salt-Induced cardiac fibrosis is independent from angiotensin II type 1a receptor signaling in mice. Hypertens. Res.30 (10), 979–989. 10.1291/hypres.30.979
53
KawarazakiW.FujitaT. (2016). The role of aldosterone in obesity-related hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens.29 (4), 415–423. 10.1093/ajh/hpw003
54
KimH.-L.JoS.-H. (2024). Arterial stiffness and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J. Korean Med. Sci.39 (23), e195. 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e195
55
KirkmanD. L.CarboneS.CanadaJ. M.TrankleC.KadariyaD.BuckleyL.et al (2021). The chronic kidney disease phenotype of HFpEF: unique cardiac characteristics. Am. J. Cardiol.142, 143–145. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.012
56
KitzmanD. W.ShahS. J. (2016). The HFpEF obesity phenotype: the elephant in the room. JACC68 (2), 200–203. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.019
57
KoppC.LinzP.DahlmannA.HammonM.JantschJ.MüllerD. N.et al (2013). 23Na magnetic resonance imaging-determined tissue sodium in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Hypertension61 (3), 635–640. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00566
58
KyriakisJ. M.AvruchJ. (2012). Mammalian MAPK signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation: a 10-year update. Physiol. Rev.92 (2), 689–737. 10.1152/physrev.00028.2011
59
LavallD.SelzerC.SchusterP.LenskiM.AdamO.SchäfersH.-J.et al (2014). The mineralocorticoid receptor promotes fibrotic remodeling in atrial fibrillation. J. Biol. Chem.289 (10), 6656–6668. 10.1074/jbc.M113.519256
60
LeeY.-S.KimJ.-A.KimK. L.JangH.-S.KimJ.-M.LeeJ.-Y.et al (2004). Aldosterone upregulates connective tissue growth factor gene expression via p38 MAPK pathway and mineralocorticoid receptor in ventricular myocytes. J. Korean Med. Sci.19 (6), 805–811. 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.6.805
61
LewisG. A.SchelbertE. B.WilliamsS. G.CunningtonC.AhmedF.McDonaghT. A.et al (2017). Biological phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.70 (17), 2186–2200. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.006
62
LiK.SongH.WeiF.LiuD.ZhaoY.YinH.et al (2022). High salt intake damages myocardial viability and induces cardiac remodeling via chronic inflammation in the elderly. Front. Cardiovasc. Med.9, 952691. 10.3389/fcvm.2022.952691
63
LiY.WuX.MaoY.LiuC.WuY.TangJ.et al (2021). Nitric oxide alleviated high salt–induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and autophagy independent of blood pressure in rats. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.9, 646575. 10.3389/fcell.2021.646575
64
LinX.LiH. (2021). Obesity: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutics. Front. Endocrinol.12, 706978. 10.3389/fendo.2021.706978
65
LiuY.-H.WangD.RhalebN.-E.YangX.-P.XuJ.SankeyS. S.et al (2005). Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase protects the heart against cardiac remodeling in mice with heart failure resulting from myocardial infarction. J. Cardiac Fail.11 (1), 74–81. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.04.004
66
Lopez-LopezA.Villar-ChedaB.QuijanoA.Garrido-GilP.Garcia-GarroteM.Díaz-RuizC.et al (2021). NADPH-oxidase, rho-kinase and autophagy mediate the (Pro)renin-Induced pro-inflammatory microglial response and enhancement of dopaminergic neuron death. Antioxidants10 (9), 1340. 10.3390/antiox10091340
67
MaH.WuK.DongF.CaiB.WuD.LuH. (2024). Effects of Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in alleviating cardiac fibrosis through SIRT6-mediated oxidative stress reduction. Sci. Rep.14 (1), 30764. 10.1038/s41598-024-80829-w
68
MadalaS. K.SchmidtS.DavidsonC.IkegamiM.WertS.HardieW. D. (2012). MEK-ERK pathway modulation ameliorates pulmonary fibrosis associated with epidermal growth factor receptor activation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.46 (3), 380–388. 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0237OC
69
MajidD. S. A.PrietoM. C.NavarL. G. (2015). Salt-sensitive hypertension: perspectives on intrarenal mechanisms. Curr. Hypertens. Rev.11 (1), 38–48. 10.2174/1573402111666150530203858
70
MartinK.TanS.-J.ToussaintN. D. (2022). Magnetic resonance imaging determination of tissue sodium in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology27 (2), 117–125. 10.1111/nep.13975
71
MascoloA.ScavoneC.RafanielloC.De AngelisA.UrbanekK.di MauroG.et al (2021). The role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the heart and lung: focus on COVID-19. Front. Pharmacol.12, 667254. 10.3389/fphar.2021.667254
72
MasengaS. K.WandiraN.Cattivelli-MurdochG.SaleemM.BeasleyH.HintonA.et al (2025). Salt sensitivity of blood pressure: mechanisms and sex-specific differences. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.[Preprint]. 10.1038/s41569-025-01135-0
73
MizunoY.IshidaT.TsujitaK.YoshimuraM. (2023). Arterial stiffness is an important predictor of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)—The effects of phosphate retention-. medRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2023.08.14.23294103
74
MorrisR. C.SebastianA.FormanA.TanakaM.SchmidlinO. (1999). Normotensive salt sensitivity: effects of race and dietary potassium. Hypertension33 (1), 18–23. 10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.18
75
MurphyA. M.WongA. L.BezuhlyM. (2015). Modulation of angiotensin II signaling in the prevention of fibrosis. Fibrogenesis and Tissue Repair8 (1), 7. 10.1186/s13069-015-0023-z
76
NatarajanR.ScottS.BaiW.YerneniK. K. V.NadlerJ. (1999). Angiotensin II signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells under high glucose conditions. Hypertension33 (1), 378–384. 10.1161/01.HYP.33.1.378
77
NavaneethabalakrishnanS.GoodlettB. L.SmithH. L.MontalvoR. A. I. I.CardenasA.MitchellB. M. (2024). Differential changes in end organ immune cells and inflammation in salt-sensitive hypertension: effects of increasing M2 macrophages. Clin. Sci.(Lond)138 (14), 921–940. 10.1042/CS20240699
78
NguyenG.DelarueF.BurckléC.BouzhirL.GillerT.SraerJ.-D. (2002). Pivotal role of the renin/prorenin receptor in angiotensin II production and cellular responses to renin. J. Clin. Investigation109 (11), 1417–1427. 10.1172/JCI14276
79
Nguyen Dinh CatA.MontezanoA. C.BurgerD.TouyzR. M. (2013). Angiotensin II, NADPH oxidase, and redox signaling in the vasculature. Antioxidants. Redox. Signal.19 (10), 1110–1120. 10.1089/ars.2012.4641
80
NieC.MengY. H.XiaoM. H.ZhuC. S.LuZ. Y.WangS. Y. (2024). Angiotensin II receptor blockers is associated a decreased left ventricular fibrosis in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol., 31(Suppl 1). 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae175.058
81
Nielles-VallespinS.WeberM.-A.BockM.BongersA.SpeierP.CombsS. E.et al (2007). 3D radial projection technique with ultrashort echo times for sodium MRI: clinical applications in human brain and skeletal muscle. Magnetic Reson. Med.57 (1), 74–81. 10.1002/mrm.21104
82
OuwerkerkR.BottomleyP. A.SolaiyappanM.SpoonerA. E.TomaselliG. F.WuK. C.et al (2008). Tissue sodium concentration in myocardial infarction in humans: a quantitative 23Na MR imaging study. Radiology248 (1), 88–96. 10.1148/radiol.2481071027
83
PalanisamyS.Funes HernandezM.ChangT. I.MahaffeyK. W. (2022). Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with finerenone, a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Cardiol. Ther.11 (3), 337–354. 10.1007/s40119-022-00269-3
84
ParkJ.-K.FischerR.DechendR.ShagdarsurenE.GapeljukA.WellnerM.et al (2007). p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibition ameliorates angiotensin II–induced target organ damage. Hypertension49 (3), 481–489. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000256831.33459.ea
85
PawM.WnukD.NitK.Bobis-WozowiczS.SzychowskiR.ŚlusarczykA.et al (2021). SB203580—a potent p38 MAPK inhibitor reduces the profibrotic bronchial fibroblasts transition associated with asthma. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (23), 12790. 10.3390/ijms222312790
86
PedrottyD. M.JessupM. (2015). “Frailty, thy name is woman” syndrome of women with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes8 (2 Suppl. 1), S48–S51. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001700
87
PendergrassK. D.GwathmeyT. M.MichalekR. D.GraysonJ. M.ChappellM. C. (2009). The angiotensin II–AT1 receptor stimulates reactive oxygen species within the cell nucleus. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun.384 (2), 149–154. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.126
88
PittB.PfefferM. A.AssmannS. F.BoineauR.AnandI. S.ClaggettB.et al (2014). Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N. Engl. J. Med.370 (15), 1383–1392. 10.1056/NEJMoa1313731
89
PitzerA.ElijovichF.LafferC. L.ErtugluL. A.SahinozM.SaleemM.et al (2022). DC ENaC-dependent inflammasome activation contributes to salt-sensitive hypertension. Circulation Res.131 (4), 328–344. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320818
90
QiY.LiangX.DaiF.GuanH.SunJ.YaoW. (2020). RhoA/ROCK pathway activation is regulated by AT1 receptor and participates in smooth muscle migration and dedifferentiation via promoting actin cytoskeleton polymerization. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21 (15), 5398. 10.3390/ijms21155398
91
QirjaziE.SalernoF. R.AkbariA.HurL.PennyJ.SchollT.et al (2020). Tissue sodium concentrations in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients by lower leg sodium-23 magnetic resonance imaging. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.36, 1234–1243. 10.1093/ndt/gfaa036
92
RickardA. J.MorganJ.BienvenuL. A.FletcherE. K.CranstonG. A.ShenJ. Z.et al (2012). Cardiomyocyte mineralocorticoid receptors are essential for deoxycorticosterone/salt-mediated inflammation and cardiac fibrosis. Hypertension60 (6), 1443–1450. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.203158
93
SamsonR.JaiswalA.EnnezatP. V.CassidyM.Le JemtelT. H. (2016). Clinical phenotypes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J. Am. Heart Assoc.5 (1), e002477. 10.1161/JAHA.115.002477
94
SchiauC.LeucuțaD.-C.DudeaS. M.ManoleS. (2021). Myocardial fibrosis as a predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Vivo35 (3), 1677–1685. 10.21873/invivo.12427
95
SchneiderM. P.RaffU.KoppC.ScheppachJ. B.ToncarS.WannerC.et al (2017). Skin sodium concentration correlates with left ventricular hypertrophy in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN28 (6), 1867–1876. 10.1681/ASN.2016060662
96
SchulmanI. H.ArandaP.RaijL.VeronesiM.ArandaF. J.MartinR. (2006). Loss of ovarian hormones increases salt sensitivity in normotensive women. Am. J. Med. Sci.331 (2), 60. 10.1097/00000441-200602000-00002
97
ScienceDirect Topics (2006). Sodium transport–an overview. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. Available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/sodium-transport (Accessed April 16, 2025).
98
SembajweL. F.SsekandiA. M.NamagandaA.MuwongeH.KasoloJ. N.KalyesubulaR.et al (2023). Glycocalyx-sodium interaction in vascular endothelium. Nutrients15 (13), 2873. 10.3390/nu15132873
99
SethiR.VishwakarmaP.PradhanA. (2024). Evidence for aldosterone antagonism in heart failure. Card. Fail. Rev.10, e15. 10.15420/cfr.2024.10
100
ShahS. J.KatzD. H.SelvarajS.BurkeM. A.YancyC. W.GheorghiadeM.et al (2015). Phenomapping for novel classification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation131 (3), 269–279. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010637
101
SolomonS. D.McMurrayJ. J. V.ClaggettB.de BoerR. A.DeMetsD.HernandezA. F.et al (2022). Dapagliflozin in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. N. Engl. J. Med.387 (12), 1089–1098. 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286
102
SopelM. J.RosinN. L.LeeT. D.LégaréJ.-F. (2011). Myocardial fibrosis in response to Angiotensin II is preceded by the recruitment of mesenchymal progenitor cells. Lab. Investig.91 (4), 565–578. 10.1038/labinvest.2010.190
103
SotákM.ClarkM.SuurB. E.BörgesonE. (2025). Inflammation and resolution in obesity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.21 (1), 45–61. 10.1038/s41574-024-01047-y
104
SotomiY.HikosoS.NakataniD.MizunoH.OkadaK.DohiT.et al (2021). Sex differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J. Am. Heart Assoc.10 (5), e018574. 10.1161/JAHA.120.018574
105
SpurneyC. F.SaliA.GuerronA. D.IantornoM.YuQ.Gordish-DressmanH.et al (2011). Losartan decreases cardiac muscle fibrosis and improves cardiac function in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther.16 (1), 87–95. 10.1177/1074248410381757
106
StockandJ. D.MeszarosJ. G. (2003). Aldosterone stimulates proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts by activating Ki-RasA and MAPK1/2 signaling. Am. J. Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology284 (1), H176–H184. 10.1152/ajpheart.00421.2002
107
SulyokE.FarkasB.NagyB.VárnagyÁ.KovácsK.BódisJ. (2022). Tissue sodium accumulation: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Antioxidants11 (4), 750. 10.3390/antiox11040750
108
TeramotoK.TengT.-H. K.ChandramouliC.TrompJ.SakataY.LamC. S. (2022). Epidemiology and clinical features of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Card. Fail. Rev.8. 10.15420/cfr.2022.06
109
TokudaK.KaiH.KuwaharaF.YasukawaH.TaharaN.KudoH.et al (2004). Pressure-independent effects of angiotensin II on hypertensive myocardial fibrosis. Hypertension43, 499–503. [Preprint]. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000111831.50834.93
110
TzavlakiK.MoustakasA. (2020). TGF-Β signaling. Biomolecules10 (3), 487. 10.3390/biom10030487
111
VermaS.PetrieM. C.BorlaugB. A.ButlerJ.DaviesM. J.KitzmanD. W.et al (2024). Inflammation in obesity-related HFpEF: the STEP-HFpEF program. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.84 (17), 1646–1662. 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.028
112
VidyasagarA.WilsonN. A.DjamaliA. (2012). Heat shock protein 27 (HSP27): biomarker of disease and therapeutic target. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair5 (1), 7. 10.1186/1755-1536-5-7
113
WanN.FujisawaY.KobaraH.MasakiT.NakanoD.RahmanA.et al (2020). Effects of an SGLT2 inhibitor on the salt sensitivity of blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity in a nondiabetic rat model of chronic kidney disease. Hypertens. Res.43 (6), 492–499. 10.1038/s41440-020-0410-8
114
WeinbergerM. H. (1996). Salt sensitivity of blood pressure in humans. Hypertension27 (3), 481–490. 10.1161/01.HYP.27.3.481
115
WendtN.SchulzA.QadriF.BolbrinkerJ.KossmehlP.WinklerK.et al (2009). Genetic analysis of salt-sensitive hypertension in Dahl rats reveals a link between cardiac fibrosis and high cholesterol. Cardiovasc. Res.81 (3), 618–626. 10.1093/cvr/cvn263
116
YangF.ChungA. C. K.HuangX. R.LanH. Y. (2009). Angiotensin II induces connective tissue growth factor and collagen I expression via transforming growth factor-beta-dependent and -independent Smad pathways: the role of Smad3. Hypertension54 (4), 877–884. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.136531
117
YauK.DhariaA.AlrowiytiI.CherneyD. Z. I. (2022). Prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD: expanding indications and practical considerations. Kidney Int. Rep.7 (7), 1463–1476. 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.094
118
YeN.DingY.WildC.ShenQ.ZhouJ. (2014). Small molecule inhibitors targeting activator protein 1 (AP-1). J. Med. Chem.57 (16), 6930–6948. 10.1021/jm5004733
119
YingW.-Z.SandersP. W. (2002). Dietary salt intake activates MAP kinases in the rat kidney. FASEB J. official Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol.16 (12), 1683–1684. 10.1096/fj.02-0982fje
120
ZhangW.ElimbanV.NijjarM. S.GuptaS. K.DhallaN. S. (2003). Role of mitogen-activated protein kinase in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Exp. Clin. Cardiol.8 (4), 173–183. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719157/. (Accessed March 31, 2025).
121
ZhangZ.WangY.ChenX.WuC.ZhouJ.ChenY.et al (2024a). The aging heart in focus: the advanced understanding of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Ageing Res. Rev.101, 102542. 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102542
122
ZhangZ.YangZ.WangS.WangX.MaoJ. (2024b). Targeting MAPK-ERK/JNK pathway: a potential intervention mechanism of myocardial fibrosis in heart failure. Biomed. and Pharmacother.173, 116413. 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116413
123
ZhangW.LiuH. T. (2002). MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res.12 (1), 9–18. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290105
124
ZiemanS. J.MelenovskyV.KassD. A. (2005). Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and therapy of arterial stiffness. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, Vasc. Biol.25 (5), 932–943. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000160548.78317.29
Summary
Keywords
salt, sensitivity, myocardial, fibrosis, remodeling, HFPEF, 23Na-MRI
Citation
Mutengo KH, Ngalamika O, Kirabo A and Masenga SK (2025) Salt sensitivity and myocardial fibrosis: unraveling the silent cardiovascular remodeling. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1626492. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1626492
Received
10 May 2025
Accepted
29 May 2025
Published
13 June 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Chrishan S Samuel, Monash University, Australia
Reviewed by
InKyeom Kim, Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea
Christopher El Mouhayyar, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Mutengo, Ngalamika, Kirabo and Masenga.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Annet Kirabo, annet.kirabo@vumc.org; Sepiso K. Masenga, sepisomasenga@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.