ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 09 September 2025

Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1633157

Synthesis, pharmacokinetic studies, and metabolite analysis of meridianin C in rats using a validated ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method

  • LX

    Liangyu Xu 1

  • ZW

    Zhaogen Wu 2

  • KR

    Karna Ramachandraiah 3

  • GJ

    Guihun Jiang 2*

  • GZ

    Guozhe Zhang 4*

  • 1. College Hospital, Jilin Medical University, Jilin, China

  • 2. School of Public Health, Jilin Medical University, Jilin, China

  • 3. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, United States

  • 4. Department of Translational Medicine, Jiangsu Medical College, Yancheng, China

Abstract

Introduction:

Meridianin C (MC) is a marine-derived indole alkaloid that has demonstrated kinase inhibitory and anti-tumor activities. Despite its diverse biological properties, no previous reports have systematically evaluated the in vivo quantitative analysis of MC and its metabolites.

Methods:

In this study, MC was synthesized following a previously reported procedure with slight modifications. A sensitive, accurate, and reliable ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS) method was developed to simultaneously detect MC and its five major metabolites (MC-1-N-O-GluA, MC-1-N-O-SO3H, MC-2′-N-O-GluA, MC-2′-N-O-SO3H, and MC-O-GluA-didehydration) in rat plasma. Rats received a single oral dose of MC (100 mg/kg), and pharmacokinetic analysis was subsequently performed.

Results:

Pharmacokinetic data revealed that MC was rapidly absorbed, with a Cmax of 44.8 ± 7.0 μmol/L, an AUC0–48h of 232.0 ± 85.9 μmol·h/L, a Tmax of 0.75 ± 0.27 h, and a t1/2 of 17.7 ± 14.1 h. Plasma concentrations of MC were significantly higher than those of its metabolites, suggesting that MC remains the predominant circulating form after oral administration. The identified metabolites mainly resulted from hydroxylation combined with glucuronide conjugation, hydroxylation combined with sulfation, and hydration combined with glucuronide conjugation.

Discussion:

These findings demonstrate that the primary metabolic pathway of MC involves hydroxylation (phase I) followed by conjugation (phase II). To our knowledge, this represents the first systematic investigation of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of MC and its metabolites in rats. The study not only advances understanding of MC disposition but also provides a valuable reference for future pharmacokinetic evaluations of other marine-derived indole alkaloids.

1 Introduction

In recent years, marine-derived natural products have gained significant attention in pharmaceutical research and development owing to their structural diversity and potent bioactivities (). Marine organisms—including sponges, tunicates, mollusks, marine bacteria, and fungi—have become prolific sources of novel secondary metabolites, many of which possess unique chemical scaffolds and demonstrate promising activities against cancer, infectious, and metabolic diseases. Notably, marine-derived natural products have shown distinct chemical novelty, new mechanisms of action, and enhanced biological activity compared with terrestrial compounds, which contributes to their increasing application in drug discovery and development (; ). Several marine alkaloidal drugs have achieved clinical success worldwide, such as Trabectedin (Yondelis®) and Lurbinectedin (Zepzelca®), which have been approved for cancer therapy, demonstrating the great translational potential of marine natural products (; ). Recent advances show that indole-derived marine natural products not only target tumor proliferation but also help overcome multidrug resistance by acting on efflux transporters such as BCRP (Breast Cancer Resistance Protein), providing new therapeutic avenues for resistant malignancies ().

Among these marine natural products, indole alkaloids from marine invertebrates, especially ascidians and sponges, have been highlighted as a rich source of lead compounds for drug discovery (). Meridianins (Figures 1A–G) are a family of brominated indole alkaloids first isolated from the Antarctic tunicate Aplidium meridianum (; ). Particularly, meridianins have received considerable attention due to its potent protein kinase inhibitory activity () and a broad spectrum of pharmacological properties, including antitumor (), antimalarial (), anti-Alzheimer’s activity () and antituberculosis effects ().

FIGURE 1

Meridianin C (MC), one of the most prominent members of the meridianin family, is characterized by an indole nucleus substituted at the C-3 position with a 2-aminopyrimidine ring, and a bromine atom at the C-5 position of the indole ring (). Pharmacologically, MC displays a broad spectrum of bioactivities. It has shown potent inhibition against a range of protein kinases, such as casein kinase 1 () and cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (), implicating its potential as a multi-target kinase inhibitor in cancer therapy and neurodegenerative disease research. In addition, MC has demonstrated strong antiproliferative effects against human tongue cancer cell lines (), as well as improved glucose uptake via GSK-3β inhibition (), supporting their therapeutic prospects not only in oncology but also in metabolic diseases such as diabetes.

Given these remarkable activities, MC has frequently served as a lead compound for the design of novel small molecules (; ), similar to other natural anticancer agents such as ferulic acid, isothiocyanates and apigenin (; ; ). Numerous synthetic MC derivatives have demonstrated improved anti-proliferative and kinase inhibitory properties compared to the parent compound (; ; ). In addition, Han et al. reported MC analogues with superior glucose uptake activity to MC through GSK-3β inhibition in hepatic cells (), while Park et al. demonstrated anti-adipogenic effects of MC derivatives by downregulating key transcription factors and adipokines ().

Despite these advances, most research has focused on the synthesis, structural modification, and in vitro biological evaluation of MC and its analogues. However, their pharmacokinetic profiles, metabolic fate in vivo and druggability remain inadequately explored. As pharmacokinetic studies are essential for understanding the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties of drug candidates (), the lack of comprehensive in vivo evaluation greatly limits the translational potential of MC.

Previously, our group characterized nine metabolites of MC in rat plasma using UHPLC/Q-TOF MS (Table 1), which enabled semi-quantitative analysis based on relative signal intensities (). The proposed metabolic pathways of MC, as illustrated in Figure 2, were established in our previous research. While this approach is valuable for identifying metabolites and elucidating metabolic pathways, it does not provide accurate or validated quantification of MC and its metabolites due to limitations in sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. In contrast, this study is the first to develop and validate a UHPLC-MS/MS method for the absolute quantification of MC and its five major metabolites in rat plasma, enabling comprehensive and reliable pharmacokinetic analysis in vivo. The UHPLC-MS/MS technique offers significant advantages, including superior sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, making it ideal for precise quantification in complex biological matrices (; ; ). Additionally, MC was synthesized using a modified protocol () to support this investigation. Overall, this advancement provides critical data to support the preclinical evaluation and drug development of MC.

TABLE 1

RT (min)NO.aCalculated
Massb
Observed mass (Da)
Fragment ions
Error (mDa)Type of metaboliteFormula
2.49M1481.0359481.0365/483.03,305.00/307.00,226.09,185.07−0.6Hydroxylation + glucuronide conjugationC18H17BrN4O7
2.97M2384.9606384.9613/386.96,305.00/307.00,226.09,209.06,197.08,185.07−0.7Hydroxylation + sulfationC12H9BrN4O4S
3.24M3305.0038305.0118/307.01,289.01,226.09,185.07−8.0HydroxylationC12H9BrN4O
3.33M4465.0410465.0421/467.0406−1.1Glucuronide conjugationC18H17BrN4O6
3.38M5465.0410465.0416,305.00/307.00,226.08,210.09,185.07,169.08−0.6Glucuronide conjugationC18H17BrN4O6
3.78M8320.9987320.9985/322.99680.22 × HydroxylationC12H9BrN4O2
3.85M9481.0359481.0359/483.03,305.00/307.00,226.09,209.06,198.09,143.060.0Hydroxylation + glucuronide conjugationC18H17BrN4O7
4.22M10289.0089289.0089/291.01,209.08,169.08,140.050.0Parent drugC12H9BrN4
4.37M11384.9606384.9608/386.96,305.00/307.00,226.09,209.06,198.09,185.07
143.06
−0.2Hydroxylation + sulfationC12H9BrN4O4S
6.06M14445.0148443.0180/445.0161,288.00/290.00,246.99/248.99,208.07,168.07−1.3Hydration + glucuronide conjugation +2 × Alcohols dehydrationC18H13BrN4O5

Qualitative analysis of MC and its metabolites in rat plasma by UHPLC/Q-TOF MS.

a

Metabolites in bold font were quantified.

b

Only one molecular ion of the isotopes was shown.

*

Bold values indicate the prototype compound (M10) and its five metabolites in the pharmacokinetic study.

FIGURE 2

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Chemicals

Puerarin (purity >98%) as internal standard (IS) was purchased from Chengdu Herbprify CO. LTD. (Beijing, China). HPLC-grade acetonitrile and formic acid were bought from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Boston, MA). Ultrapure water was obtained by a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, France). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

2.2 Synthesis of MC

As depicted in Figure 3, MC was synthesized in four steps starting from 5-bromoacetyl indole, and the nitrogen of raw material was then protected using p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (TsCl), triethylamine, and 4-dimethylaminopyrimidine (DMAP) in a solvent (DCM). The enaminone was then obtained by reacting protected in-dole derivative with DMF/dimethylformamide-diemthylacetal (DMF-DMA) at reflux for 5 h. The reaction of cyclization and deprotection of the enaminone derivative were completed by utilizing potassium carbonate and guanidine hydrochloride to finally synthesize MC ().

FIGURE 3

2.3 Experimental animals

Sprague Dawley rats (male, 220–250 g) were purchased from the SPF Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Animals were acclimated under controlled conditions (temperature 22 °C ± 2 °C, humidity 50%–60%, 12 h light cycle) with unlimited fodder and water access for 7 days. The animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Review Committee of Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China (LLSQ-2021-031106).

2.4 Drug administration and sampling

After fasting overnight, six rats were orally administered 100 mg/kg MC suspended in 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium solution (10.0 mg/mL). Blood samples (about 300 μL) were collected into heparinized polythene tubes from the suborbital vein at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after administration. All samples were immediately centrifuged at 6,125 g for 5 min at 4 °C to acquire plasma. The plasma samples were preserved at − 80 °C until further analysis.

2.5 Preparation of calibrations samples and quality control samples

MC, accurately weighted, was firstly dissolved in methanol to acquire the standard stock solutions (250 μg/mL). A set of standard working solutions (25,000.0 ng/mL, 12,500.0 ng/mL, 2,500.0 ng/mL, 1,250.0 ng/mL, 625.0 ng/mL, 250.0 ng/mL, 125.0 ng/mL, 31.25 ng/mL) were obtained by diluting the stock solutions with methanol. An aliquot of 20 µL of these standard working solutions was then spiked into 1.5 mL polythene tubes and the solvent of methanol was evaporated at room temperature. Afterwards, the calibration standards (5,000.0 ng/mL, 2,500.0 ng/mL, 500.0 ng/mL, 250.0 ng/mL, 125.0 ng/mL, 50.0 ng/mL, 25.0 ng/mL, 6.25 ng/mL) were obtained by adding blank plasma (100 µL) into the tubes and fully mixing. The preparation method of quality control samples (QCs, 25.0 ng/mL, 1,250.0 ng/mL, 4,000.0 ng/mL) was identical with that of the calibration standards. All solutions were stored at 4 °C until further use.

2.6 Samples processing

For the measurement of the concentrations of MC and its metabolites, three times volume of methanol, containing 20 µL IS (puerarin, 2,160.0 ng/mL), were added to 100 µL plasma samples to precipitate protein. After vortexing for 2 min, the mixtures were centrifuged at 6,125 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The obtained supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes and allowed to be dried at room temperature by a nitrogen blowing instrument. Then, the remaining residues were re-dissolved with 100 µL methanol–water (80:20, v/v). Following centrifugation at 16,173 g for 10 min, the supernatants were transferred and used for UHPLC/Q-TOF MS assessment. The injection volume of each sample was 1 μL.

2.7 UHPLC and MS conditions

The UHPLC-MS system comprised of an Acquity UPLC system (Waters, Milford, United States) and Waters TQD tandem mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. A Waters ACQUITY BEH C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, United States) was used for the chromatography separation. The column temperature was set to 40 °C. The mobile phase was composed of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B) with a fixed flow rate at 0.4 mL/min. A gradient elution program was used as follows: 0–1.5 min, 5%–20% B; 1.5–5 min, 20%–30% B; 5–7 min, 30%–95% B; 7–9 min, 95% B; 9–11 min, 95% B.

The MS tune parameters were set as mentioned below. The desolvation of the source temperatures was set at 500 °C. The flow rate of nebulization gas was 650 L/h. The capillary voltage was set at 2.8 kV in the positive ionization mode. The cone voltages were maintained at 35 V for all the tested ingredients. All data were obtained via the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) ion mode. The range of m/z for the data collection was set at 100–1,500 Da. Transitions, cone voltage and a collision energy of MC and its metabolites were optimized (Table 2). The mass spectrum of MC and the chemical structures of its MS/MS fragments is shown in Figure 4, and The mass spectrum of puerarin and the chemical structures of its MS/MS fragments is shown in Figure 5. MassLynx™ software version 4.1 was used for data acquisition and TargetLynx™ (Waters, Milford, MA, United States) was applied to quantitation.

TABLE 2

CompoundsTransitionsCollision energy (V)Cone voltage (V)
M1, M9483.0→305.04235
M2, M11385.0→226.14235
MC289.0→209.14535
M14443.0→288.04535
PUR (IS)417.1→297.03035

Transitions, cone voltage and a collision energy of compounds in MRM mode.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 5

2.8 Method validation

All method validation procedures were performed strictly in accordance with the US FDA Guidance for Industry on Bioanalytical Method Validation (). The assessment of selectivity was performed via comparing chromatograms among blank rat plasma (six different batches) and rat plasma spiked with MC and IS. The evaluation of linearity was carried out using weighted (1/x2) least-squares analysis of two sets of calibration standards. Three different concentrations of Quality Check: QCs (n = 6) standards were used and detected on three different days to evaluate the intra-day and inter-day precision and the accuracy. Similarly, matrix effect and extraction recovery were assessed using three different concentrations of QCs (n = 6). The matrix effect was evaluated via calculating the peak area ratio of MC in post-spiked QCs and the solvent-substituted samples with same concentration. The extraction recovery was assessed via calculating the peak area ratio of MC in pre-spiked and post-spiked QCs. The stability of MC was examined using three concentrations of QCs (n = 3) under three different storage conditions, including freeze-thaw stability (three cycles from −20 °C to ambient temperature), short-term stability (storage at 20 °C–25 °C for 24 h), and long-term stability (storage at −20 °C for 30 days).

2.9 Pharmacokinetics study

The concentrations of MC in the collected plasma samples were quantified by the established calibration curve based on peak areas of corresponding components. Owing to the lack of corresponding standards, calibration curves for the metabolites were not established. It has been reported that the concentrations of the metabolites could be quantified according to calibration curve of parent drug. This is possible due to the structural similarity of their parent nucleus (). Therefore, in this study, the concentrations of the metabolites were calculated via the calibration curve of MC. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of MC and its metabolites were calculated via a non-compartmental model with the pharmacokinetic software, DAS (ver. 2.0, Chinese Pharmacology Association, Shanghai, China).

2.10 Data analysis

Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated by DAS software (version 2.0, Chinese Pharmacological Society, Shanghai, China), including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0–t), time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), elimination half-time (t1/2), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Data were expressed in mean and standard deviation (SD) of each group. A paired t-test was used to analyze the significance of the differences between the two groups. p-value was considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 (SPSS 18.0 software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).

3 Results

3.1 Synthesis of MC

Synthesis of MC was performed as described by with slight modifications. MC was synthesized in four steps as depicted in Figure 3. The reactions were monitored by TLC. The synthesis of MC was achieved with an overall yield of 32%. The structure of MC was confirmed by both 1H NMR spectrometry (Supplementary Figure S1) and MS techniques (Supplementary Figure S2).

3.2 Method validation

3.2.1 Selectivity

The selectivity of the method was demonstrated by analyzing six different batches of blank rat plasma and rat plasma spiked with MC and Internal Standard (Puerarin). The Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatograms of blank (control), MC and IS are displayed in Figure 6 while MRM of MC and quantified metabolites are shown in Figure 7. The results showed that there was no obvious endogenous interference in the detection of the analytes and the IS, demonstrating the selectivity of the method.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 7

3.2.2 Linearity and sensitivity

To evaluate the linearity, calibration curve for MC was established by analyzing the spiked calibration samples with the concentrations ranging from 6.25 to 5,000 ng/mL. The obtained equation of the calibration curve was y = 0.0374x + 80.251 (r2 = 0.9958), where y represents the peak area ratio of MC/IS and x represents the concentration of MC in rat plasma. The correlation of determination (r2) surpassed 0.99, indicating a good linearity of the calibration curve in the measured concentration range. The lower limit of quantifications (LLOQ) of MC in rat plasma was detected to be 6.25 ng/mL. This indicated the higher sensitivity of the system.

3.2.3 Accuracy and precision

To evaluate the precision and accuracy, six replicates of QC samples were detected at three concentrations on three successive days. As shown in Table 3, the range of intraday and inter-day precision values for MC were 7.4%–12.5% and 10.9%–14.3%, respectively. These values were within the limits (<15%). Furthermore, the accuracy values were found to be between −10.5% and 3.2%, which met the criteria of no more than ±15%. The results indicated the optimal reproducibility of the method.

TABLE 3

Marker compoundsConcentration (ng/mL)RSD (%)RE (%)
AddedFoundIntra-dayInter-day
MC25.025.89.810.93.2
1,250.01,137.57.411.6−9.0
4,000.03,580.012.514.3−10.5

Precision and accuracy of MC in rat plasma (n = 6).

3.2.4 Recovery and matrix effect

The pre-spiked QCs were obtained by the utilization of methanol, which caused the precipitation of proteins in plasma after the addition of MC and IS. On the other hand, for post-spiked QCs, methanol (protein precipitation) was added into plasma before the addition of MC and IS. The extraction recovery was described as the peak area ratio of MC in pre-spiked and post-spiked QCs. The recovery of MC ranged from 95.9% to 106.1% (Table 4), which complied with the criteria of Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The matrix effect was assessed by calculating the peak area ratio of MC in post-spiked QCs and the sol-vent-substituted samples. Nonetheless, the matrix effect of MC ranged from 94.0% to 108.9% (Table 4), which was within the limits of acceptability.

TABLE 4

Marker compoundsConcentration (ng/mL)Recovery (%)RSD (%)Matrix effect (%)RSD (%)
MC25.0102.32.294.07.0
1,250.095.92.8108.91.9
4,000.0106.14.6108.22.9
IS432.098.16.891.87.2

Recovery and matrix effects of MC and IS in rat plasma (n = 6).

3.2.5 Stability

The stability was estimated by analyzing QCs (25.0, 1,250.0, and 4,000.0 ng/mL) after storing in three different conditions: three freeze-thaw cycles (−20 °C to ambient temperature), 20 °C–25 for 24 h, and - 20 °C for 30 days. As presented in Table 5, the deviations in the stabilities of MC ranged from - 8.5% to 13.5% under the three different storage conditions. The results revealed that MC was stable in all the three conditions.

TABLE 5

Marker compoundsConcentration (ng/mL)Stability (re, %)
Freeze-thaw (3 cycles)20 °C–25 °C/24 h−20 °C/30 days
MC25.013.512.510.6
1,250.012.67.95.2
4,000.09.3−6.8−8.5

Stability of MC in rat plasma (n = 3).

3.2.6 Pharmacokinetic application

The established UHPLC-MS/MS approach was successfully employed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of MC and its metabolites (M1, M2, M9, M11 and M14) after a single (dose) oral administration of MC (100 mg/kg) to rats. The mean plasma concentration-time curves of the MC and its metabolites are presented in Figure 8. The main pharmacokinetic parameters estimated via non-compartmental analysis are compiled in Table 6. The Cmax for MC was 44.8 μmol/L, whereas it’s AUC0–48h, Tmax, and half-life (t1/2) were found to be 232.0 μmol h/L, 0.75 h, and 17.7 h, respectively. On the other side, the Cmax for M1, M2, M9, M11 and M14 was 0.92, 6.4, 0.01, 1.6 and 1.9 μmol/L and their Tmax occurred at 2.5, 0.50, 2.4, 0.88 and 3.9 h, respectively. Additionally, the AUC0–48h of these five metabolites (M1, M2, M9, M11, M14) was estimated to be 27.7, 11.1, 1.3 × 103, 58.7 and 9.9-fold less than that of MC, respectively. However, the system failed to quantify the concentration of M3, M4, M5, and M8 in plasma samples because their contents were lower than the limit of quantification (LOQ).

FIGURE 8

TABLE 6

ParametersUnitsMCM1M2M9M11M14
AUC0–48hμmol·h/L232.0 ± 85.98.4 ± 2.920.9 ± 8.50.18 ± 0.124.0 ± 1.123.4 ± 2.5
Cmaxμmol/L44.8 ± 7.00.92 ± 0.476.4 ± 2.00.010 ± 0.0011.6 ± 0.61.9 ± 0.6
Tmaxh0.75 ± 0.272.5 ± 4.70.50 ± 0.272.4 ± 4.70.88 ± 0.633.9 ± 5.0
t1/2h17.7 ± 14.16.4 ± 4.34.4 ± 2.713.5 ± 6.03.4 ± 2.213.5 ± 7.2

Pharmacokinetic parameters of MC and its main metabolites in rat plasma after intragastric administration of 100 mg/kg MC (n = 6).

4 Discussion

MC, an indole alkaloid derived from marine organisms, is known to possess a variety of pharmacological activities and is often used as a core scaffold for the synthesis of active substances (; ). Several studies have proposed MC as a promising lead compound for drug development, but most previous reports have focused on synthesis, structural modification, and in vitro biological evaluation (). To date, there have been no studies providing validated quantitative data on the pharmacokinetics of MC and its metabolites in vivo. Previous investigations—including our own UHPLC/Q-TOF MS metabolite profiling—were limited to semi-quantitative analyses, lacking the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility required for robust pharmacokinetic evaluation (). In contrast, the present study is the first to employ a validated UHPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous absolute quantification of MC and its major metabolites, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of their pharmacokinetic profiles in vivo.

In our previous study, nine metabolites of MC were detected in rat plasma after oral administration (). To further investigate their pharmacokinetics profile, we determined the concentrations of MC and its five major metabolites in rat plasma according to the established UHPLC-MS/MS approach (Figure 8). The pharmacokinetic evaluation per-formed by non-compartmental analysis is shown in Table 6. Pharmacokinetic evaluation showed rapid absorption of MC, as indicated by the high plasma concentrations of MC and its metabolites at 0.75 h post-dosing. This is consistent with findings by , who reported that indole alkaloids in Uncaria Hook (e.g., geissoschizine methyl ether) are rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream after oral administration, with a Tmax of 0.42–0.67 h. The Cmax and AUC0–48h of MC were significantly higher than those of its metabolites, indicating it remains the predominant plasma compound post-oral administration—suggesting favorable bioavailability. This contrasts with Hase et al.’s findings on vincamine (a structurally related indole alkaloid): they noted vincamine has low bioavailability, further affected by formulation and other components (). In our study, MC maintains high plasma levels in its original form with high Cmax and AUC0–48h, pointing to better bioavailability than vincamine and potentially other related indole alkaloids. Additionally, the observed multiple peaks in the plasma concentration–time profile and the long half-life (17.7 ± 14.1 h) imply possible enterohepatic recirculation, a phenomenon also documented for other indole alkaloids such as 10-methoxycamptothecin (). Enterohepatic recirculation has been shown to enhance drug exposure and prolong the pharmacological effects of various natural products ().

It was also observed that M2 (MC-1-N-O-SO3H) and M14 (MC-O-GluA-didehydration) were the two metabolites with relatively high AUC0-48h values. This showed that hydroxylation + sulfation and hydroxylation + glucuronide conjugation were the major metabolic pathways (phase II metabolism) of MC, which is consistent with the findings of our previous study (). This phase II metabolism pattern aligns with previous reports on the metabolism of other natural products, where conjugation typically increases polarity and reduces toxicity (). Importantly, some glucuronidated or sulfated metabolites may retain or even surpass the biological activities of the parent compound, as reported for morphine-6-glucuronide and berberrubine-9-O-β-D-glucuronide (; ). Given the broad bioactivity spectrum of MC, future studies should focus on evaluating the pharmacological potential of its glucuronidated metabolites, which may provide improved efficacy and safety.

5 Conclusion

In summary, this study is the first to quantitatively analyze Meridianin C (MC) and its major metabolites in vivo, providing validated pharmacokinetic data. A sensitive and validated UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of MC and its five major metabolites in rat plasma, and this rapid method can be readily extended to other halogenated indole alkaloids. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that MC had higher systemic exposure (AUC048h) than its metabolites. Notably, metabolites M2 and M14, which exhibited relatively high AUC048h values, revealed that hydroxylation combined with sulfation and hydroxylation combined with glucuronidation are the primary phase II metabolic pathways. These findings highlight the significance of phase II metabolites in drug development and provide valuable data for the preclinical development of MC-based drug candidates. Future studies should investigate the in vivo pharmacological activity of these metabolites and further characterize the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of MC to fully elucidate its druggability and therapeutic potential.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Experiment Ethics Review Committee of Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine (LLSQ-2021-031106). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

LX: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. ZW: Writing – review and editing. KR: Data curation, Validation, Writing – review and editing. GJ: Formal Analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. GZ: Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 22KJD360002), Science and Technology Research Project of the Department of Education of Jilin Province (JJKH20240588KJ), and Science and Technology Innovation Development Program Project of Jilin City (20230406208).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1633157/full#supplementary-material

References

Summary

Keywords

meridianin C, indole alkaloid, synthesis, metabolites, pharmacokinetics, UHPLC-MS/MS

Citation

Xu L, Wu Z, Ramachandraiah K, Jiang G and Zhang G (2025) Synthesis, pharmacokinetic studies, and metabolite analysis of meridianin C in rats using a validated ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1633157. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1633157

Received

12 June 2025

Accepted

27 August 2025

Published

09 September 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

André Dallmann, Bayer, France

Reviewed by

Sandeep K. Singh, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States

Bikash Debnath, Tripura University, India

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Guihun Jiang, ; Guozhe Zhang,

† These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics