Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Stratification System for Pharmaceutical Care in Cancer Patients: Chinese Expert Consensus

Provisionally accepted
Ya  ChenYa Chen1Xue  MaXue Ma1Mao  LinMao Lin1Zhiqiang  HuZhiqiang Hu1Junxiang  ZhouJunxiang Zhou1Yue  QiuYue Qiu1Zhixi  LiuZhixi Liu1Suya  DuSuya Du1Lihong  ShiLihong Shi1Li  HanLi Han1Yan  ChenYan Chen1Tingting  QiTingting Qi1Yu  ZhangYu Zhang2*Guohui  LiGuohui Li3*Hongtao  XiaoHongtao Xiao1*
  • 1Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China
  • 2Tongji Medical College Medical Information Research Institute, Wuhan, China
  • 3Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

China bears the world's highest cancer incidence and mortality rates, underscoring the urgent need for precise pharmaceutical care within its complex, multimodal treatment environment. To address the lack of a standardized framework, a multidisciplinary expert panel led by the Sichuan Cancer Hospital developed an evidence-and practice-informed consensus through systematic reviews, national surveys, and Delphi consultations. This consensus proposes a novel three-level stratification system based on comprehensive assessment of three core dimensions: pathophysiological conditions (including fertility preservation, age, body mass index, performance status, comorbid chronic disease, concurrent infection, nutritional status and support, pain management, and hepatic/renal impairment), medication-related factors (encompassing oncology-specific medication considerations such as antineoplastic agents toxicity risk management, antineoplastic agents toxicity management, therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenomics, clinically significant drug-drug interactions, polypharmacy, special routes of administration or delivery devices, medication adherence, and complex medication issues), and non-medication therapeutic interventions (including radiotherapy, interventional therapy, surgery, and novel therapies such as CAR-T and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy). Level 1 applies to life-threatening or disabling situations requiring intensive real-time monitoring; Level 2 to serious but non-immediately life-threatening situations requiring systematic management; and Level 3 to stable conditions with mild-to-moderate medication-related risks requiring periodic review. Implementation principles are provided, including prioritizing high-risk patients, assigning the highest applicable level when multiple criteria are met, and conducting dynamic reassessment based on clinical changes. Ultimately, this standardized, practical, and oncology-specific framework aims to enhance the quality, precision, and efficiency of pharmaceutical services, optimize healthcare resource utilization, and improve patient safety and treatment outcomes across China, while also offering a reference model for international efforts to establish or refine oncology pharmaceutical care standards.

Keywords: cancer patients, Chinese, expert consensus, pharmaceutical care, Stratification system

Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 12 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Ma, Lin, Hu, Zhou, Qiu, Liu, Du, Shi, Han, Chen, Qi, Zhang, Li and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yu Zhang
Guohui Li
Hongtao Xiao

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.