ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
Stratification System for Pharmaceutical Care in Cancer Patients: Chinese Expert Consensus
Provisionally accepted- 1Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China
- 2Tongji Medical College Medical Information Research Institute, Wuhan, China
- 3Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
China bears the world's highest cancer incidence and mortality rates, underscoring the urgent need for precise pharmaceutical care within its complex, multimodal treatment environment. To address the lack of a standardized framework, a multidisciplinary expert panel led by the Sichuan Cancer Hospital developed an evidence-and practice-informed consensus through systematic reviews, national surveys, and Delphi consultations. This consensus proposes a novel three-level stratification system based on comprehensive assessment of three core dimensions: pathophysiological conditions (including fertility preservation, age, body mass index, performance status, comorbid chronic disease, concurrent infection, nutritional status and support, pain management, and hepatic/renal impairment), medication-related factors (encompassing oncology-specific medication considerations such as antineoplastic agents toxicity risk management, antineoplastic agents toxicity management, therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenomics, clinically significant drug-drug interactions, polypharmacy, special routes of administration or delivery devices, medication adherence, and complex medication issues), and non-medication therapeutic interventions (including radiotherapy, interventional therapy, surgery, and novel therapies such as CAR-T and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy). Level 1 applies to life-threatening or disabling situations requiring intensive real-time monitoring; Level 2 to serious but non-immediately life-threatening situations requiring systematic management; and Level 3 to stable conditions with mild-to-moderate medication-related risks requiring periodic review. Implementation principles are provided, including prioritizing high-risk patients, assigning the highest applicable level when multiple criteria are met, and conducting dynamic reassessment based on clinical changes. Ultimately, this standardized, practical, and oncology-specific framework aims to enhance the quality, precision, and efficiency of pharmaceutical services, optimize healthcare resource utilization, and improve patient safety and treatment outcomes across China, while also offering a reference model for international efforts to establish or refine oncology pharmaceutical care standards.
Keywords: cancer patients, Chinese, expert consensus, pharmaceutical care, Stratification system
Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 12 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Ma, Lin, Hu, Zhou, Qiu, Liu, Du, Shi, Han, Chen, Qi, Zhang, Li and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yu Zhang
Guohui Li
Hongtao Xiao
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
