Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology

This article is part of the Research TopicBiologic Drugs for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) and Vaccines for infections: Validation, Drug-Utilization, Effectiveness, Regulation, Costs, and Safety in the real worldView all 8 articles

Drug-Associated Insomnia and Sex-Specific Disproportionality in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2019–Q1 2025)

Provisionally accepted
Hao  WenHao Wen1,2Yuchuan  ShenYuchuan Shen1,2Hai  LiHai Li1Xiangbin  ChenXiangbin Chen1Yanzhao  LinYanzhao Lin1*Wei  BinWei Bin1,2*
  • 1Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Chinese Medicine Guangdong Laboratory (Hengqin Laboratory), Zhuhai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Insomnia is a frequent and clinically relevant adverse drug reaction that can impair quality of life, treatment adherence and long-term outcomes. Evidence on drug-associated insomnia has largely been derived from selected clinical trial populations or focused on individual drug classes, while comprehensive post-marketing assessments—particularly those considering potential sex-related heterogeneity—remain limited. Using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), we conducted a large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis to identify and characterise drug–insomnia signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) and to explore potential sex-related heterogeneity in reporting patterns. Individual case safety reports from January 2019 to March 2025 were analysed using a transparent, multi-step preprocessing pipeline, including removal of deleted cases, consolidation by case identifier and case version, and additional rule-based deduplication across case identifiers. Insomnia cases were identified using a narrow set of MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs)—insomnia, initial insomnia, middle insomnia, terminal insomnia, and early morning awakening—and analyses were restricted to parent systemic drugs. Disproportionality was assessed using reporting odds ratios (RORs) in primary-suspect and any-suspect analyses. Sex-stratified RORs were estimated for female and male reports, and formal heterogeneity was evaluated using interaction-based metrics with false discovery rate control. The final analytic cohort comprised 2,935,560 unique reports, of which 74,444 contained insomnia reactions after exclusion of sleep-related indications. A broad spectrum of psychotropic and non-psychotropic agents showed SDRs for insomnia, spanning hypnotics, antineoplastic therapies, immunomodulators, endocrine agents and commonly used anti-infectives. Sex-stratified analyses revealed largely overlapping signal profiles between females and males, and formal heterogeneity testing identified few drug–insomnia pairs with robust evidence of sex-related heterogeneity after multiple-testing correction. These findings represent signals of disproportionate reporting rather than estimates of incidence or causal risk. Observed sex-related heterogeneity should therefore be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and may reflect heterogeneity in exposure prevalence, prescribing indications and reporting context rather than intrinsic biological susceptibility. Overall, this study provides a contemporary overview of drug-associated insomnia reporting in FAERS and highlights drug–sex combinations that may warrant further investigation in analytically adjusted pharmacoepidemiologic studies.

Keywords: adverse drug reactions, Disproportionality analysis, FAERS, insomnia, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacovigilance, sex differences

Received: 01 Dec 2025; Accepted: 21 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Wen, Shen, Li, Chen, Lin and Bin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yanzhao Lin
Wei Bin

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.