ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology
This article is part of the Research TopicPharmacoepidemiology in Chronic DiseasesView all 22 articles
Temporal Trends in Stroke-Prevention Medication Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- 2Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- 3Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Hospital Chiali, Tainan City, Taiwan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been reported to exhibit a higher risk of stroke, particularly among those with a history of COPD exacerbations. However, the prescription patterns of stroke-prevention medications in this population remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize the temporal trends of stroke-prevention therapies among patients with COPD and AF, to describe concurrent trends in clinical outcomes, and to assess whether prescribing patterns differed by COPD exacerbation history. Methods: Newly diagnosed AF and COPD patients were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Prescription patterns of stroke-prevention medications within one year after AF diagnosis were examined. Stroke-prevention medications included warfarin, non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and oral antiplatelet agents (OAPTs). The temporal changes of medication use and 1-year incidence rate of ischemic stroke and major bleeding across AF diagnosis years were analyzed. Results: A total of 13,072 patients were included. From 2013 to 2022, use of any NOAC increased from 15.4% to 65.4% of patients, whereas warfarin use declined from 24.0% to 6.1% (both p < 0.0001). For patient-level prescription patterns, the proportion of patients receiving NOAC only increased from 2.6% in 2013 to 33.1% in 2022. Use of NOAC plus OAPT also rose steadily from 7.6% to 29.6%, becoming the second most common pattern after 2018. The overall treatment landscape shifted markedly from warfarin-or antiplatelet-based regimens to those predominantly centered on NOACs (p < 0.0001). Concurrent trends in ischemic stroke and major bleeding incidence rates both declined significantly over time (p = 0.0025 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The prescription pattern showed no statistically significant difference between patients with or without a COPD exacerbation history. Conclusion: Nationwide real-world data demonstrated a dramatic shift over the past decade in stroke-prevention strategies among patients with coexisting COPD and AF, moving from warfarin-or OAPT-based therapy to predominantly NOAC-based therapy. Ischemic stroke and major bleeding were decreased over the calendar years. COPD exacerbation history didn't alter stroke-prevention medication use, though this subgroup warrants attention due to elevated cardiovascular risks.
Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Prescription pattern, Stroke prevention, Temporal trend
Received: 06 Dec 2025; Accepted: 02 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Shen, Kitikannakorn, Chen, Sirichanchuen, Jenraumjit and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chung-Yu Chen
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
