- 1Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- 2Department of Emergency, Guang’anmen Hospital, Beijing, China
Escitalopram is widely regarded as a well-tolerated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with a favorable safety profile. However, severe adverse events can occur even at therapeutic doses in susceptible individuals. Here, we report a rare case of simultaneous life-threatening Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone secretion (SIADH) and cardiac toxicity induced by standard-dose escitalopram. A 51-year-old female (weight 50 kg) presented with severe fatigue and anorexia. Initial laboratory results revealed profound hyponatremia (116.1 mmol/L). Following sodium supplementation, serum sodium paradoxically decreased to 114.7 mmol/L (“desalination phenomenon”), while urinary sodium excretion was markedly elevated (220 mmol/24 h) alongside significant hypouricemia (76 μmol/L), confirming the diagnosis of SIADH. Concurrently, the patient manifested significant cardiac toxicity, including sinus bradycardia (41–55 bpm) and marked QTc prolongation (570 ms). Pharmacogenetic analysis identified the CYP2C19 *1/*2 genotype (Intermediate Metabolizer). Despite the therapeutic dosage (10 mg/day) and a non-toxic serum concentration (5 ng/mL measured 72 h post-discontinuation), the patient exhibited severe toxicity, likely driven by “phenoconversion” due to low muscle mass and physiological vulnerability, exacerbated by a pharmacodynamic synergism with low-dose quetiapine. Discontinuation of medications and strict fluid management resulted in complete resolution of both hyponatremia and arrhythmia. The causality was assessed as “probable” for both drugs using the Naranjo Algorithm, and the drug-drug interaction was rated as “probable” using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS). This case highlights that genotype-phenotype mismatch, combined with pharmacodynamic synergism (escitalopram-quetiapine interaction), can precipitate severe neuro-cardiac toxicity even at therapeutic levels. It underscores that severe neuro-cardiac toxicity can occur even at therapeutic levels due to individual vulnerability. Therefore, routine monitoring of electrolytes and electrocardiograms (ECG) remains indispensable for patient safety, as pharmacogenetic screening and therapeutic drug monitoring may not predict such idiosyncratic reactions in resource-constrained settings.
1 Introduction
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), particularly escitalopram, are widely prescribed as first-line treatments for depression and anxiety due to their generally favorable safety profile compared to tricyclic antidepressants (Peretti et al., 2000; Rief et al., 2009; Anderson, 2000; Cipriani et al., 2018; Cipriani et al., 2009). However, electrolyte disturbances, specifically hyponatremia secondary to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), remain a significant complication. The incidence of SSRI-induced hyponatremia varies widely, ranging from 0.5% to 32%. Older adults are particularly vulnerable due to age-related decline in renal water excretion, low body weight, and polypharmacy (Liamis et al., 2008; Leth-Møller et al., 2016; Jacob and Spinler, 2006; Capinha et al., 2025). Drug-induced hyponatremia in this population is often overlooked but can lead to severe consequences, including cognitive impairment and falls.
While hyponatremia often presents as a metabolic emergency, emergency physicians must also remain vigilant regarding concurrent cardiovascular toxicity. Escitalopram is known to cause dose-dependent QTc interval prolongation, prompting specific regulatory warnings (US Food and Drug Administration, 2011; Kim et al., 2021; Hasnain et al., 2013; Ojero-Senard et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2016). Furthermore, the co-administration of atypical antipsychotics, such as quetiapine, may exacerbate this risk through pharmacodynamic synergism, potentially leading to life-threatening arrhythmias like torsade de pointes (TdP), especially in the presence of electrolyte abnormalities (Hasnain et al., 2014; Das et al., 2021; Matsuo and Yamaori, 2022).
The metabolic clearance of escitalopram is primarily mediated by the cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) enzyme. Genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C19 significantly influence drug exposure and toxicity risk (Yu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2014; Jin et al., 2010; Noehr-Jensen et al., 2009; Jukić et al., 2018). While “poor metabolizers” (PM) are widely recognized as high-risk candidates for drug accumulation, the clinical implications for “intermediate metabolizers” (IM, e.g., *1/*2 genotype) are less frequently reported, particularly regarding severe adverse events at therapeutic dosages. In specific clinical contexts—such as low body weight or physiological decline—these patients may undergo “phenoconversion,” exhibiting a toxicity profile resembling that of poor metabolizers (Klomp et al., 2020; de Jong et al., 2023; Scherf-Clavel et al., 2024; Darakjian et al., 2021; Mostafa et al., 2021; Lenoir et al., 2021).
Here, we report a rare case of a 51-year-old female presenting to the Emergency Department with severe symptomatic hyponatremia (116 mmol/L) and significant QTc prolongation (570 ms). Despite receiving therapeutic doses of escitalopram and low-dose quetiapine, the patient developed life-threatening neuro-cardiac toxicity. This report details the diagnostic utility of the “desalination phenomenon” in confirming SIADH and explores the critical role of the CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer genotype in the pathogenesis of toxicity at therapeutic levels.
2 Case description
A 51-year-old female (weight 50 kg, height 158 cm) presented to the Emergency Department on Day 0 with a 1-day history of worsening fatigue, nausea, and anorexia. Four months prior to admission, the patient underwent a comprehensive health check-up, including a head CT and 24-h Holter monitoring, which revealed no structural brain lesions and a normal baseline heart rate variability (SDNN 146 ms) without arrhythmia. Her medical history was significant for anxiety diagnosed 1 month prior, initially treated with citalopram 20 mg daily. This was switched 10 days prior to presentation to escitalopram 10 mg daily, and quetiapine 50 mg daily was simultaneously initiated, alongside zopiclone for insomnia. Upon arrival (Day 0), she was hemodynamically stable but hypertensive (blood pressure 168/96 mmHg) with a heart rate of 61 bpm. Initial laboratory evaluation revealed severe hyponatremia (serum sodium 116.1 mmol/L) with concomitant hypochloremia (83.1 mmol/L) and low-normal potassium (3.47 mmol/L). Following initial antiemetic treatment, an infusion of 0.9% saline supplemented with hypertonic saline was initiated to correct the hyponatremia (Table 1).
Despite aggressive sodium supplement, repeat testing on the morning of Day 1 revealed a paradoxical decline in serum sodium to 114.7 mmol/L. This “desalination phenomenon”—where serum sodium drops following isotonic saline administration due to the rapid renal excretion of sodium while retaining free water—strongly suggested the Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone secretion (SIADH) rather than hypovolemic hyponatremia (Steele et al., 1997; Musch and Decaux, 1998; Sterns and Silver, 2008). Simultaneously, continuous cardiac monitoring alerted the clinical team to a new-onset sinus bradycardia (fluctuating between 41 and 55 bpm) and a markedly prolonged QTc interval of 570 ms (QTc-E 509 ms). Suspecting drug-induced neuro-cardiac toxicity (US Food and Drug Administration, 2011; Kim et al., 2021; Hasnain et al., 2013; Ojero-Senard et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2016; Hasnain et al., 2014; Das et al., 2021; Matsuo and Yamaori, 2022), a formal decision was made to permanently withhold escitalopram and quetiapine. Upon detailed history taking, it was revealed that the patient had already self-discontinued these medications on the day of symptom onset (Day −1) due to severe intolerance. Consequently, therapeutic management focused on strict fluid restriction and supportive care to facilitate drug washout, while sodium levels were carefully managed with hypertonic saline boluses.
A comprehensive diagnostic workup on Day 2 confirmed the diagnosis of SIADH. The patient was clinically euvolemic with a low serum osmolality (258 mOsm/kg) and inappropriately elevated urine osmolality (432 mOsm/kg). Crucially, the biochemical profile showed hallmark features of SIADH, including profound hypouricemia (serum uric acid 76 μmol/L), a low blood urea nitrogen (1.8 mmol/L), and massive urinary sodium excretion (220 mmol/24 h) (Fenske et al., 2008). Other etiologies were rigorously excluded: thyroid function (TSH 1.53 mIU/L, FT4 1.33 ng/dL) and adrenal function (ACTH 43.08 pg/mL, Cortisol 22.27 μg/dL) were within normal limits, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was normal (<35 pg/mL), ruling out cardiac failure as a primary cause of hyponatremia.
Consistent with the progressive pharmacokinetic washout of the drugs and the implementation of strict fluid restriction, the patient’s clinical status improved markedly (Figure 1). By Day 3, serum sodium had normalized to 132.8 mmol/L, and the heart rate stabilized at 65 bpm. Pharmacogenetic testing revealed the patient to be a CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer (*1/*2 genotype) (Bousman et al., 2023a; Hicks et al., 2017). Genetic testing identified the loss-of-function allele c.681G>A (*2), while c.636G>A (*3) and promoter variant c.-806C>T (*17) were wild-type. Therapeutic drug monitoring performed 72 h after the last dose showed a serum escitalopram concentration of 5 ng/mL (Schoretsanitis et al., 2018). By Day 6, the patient was fully recovered with a stable serum sodium of 135.2 mmol/L, normalized serum uric acid (131 μmol/L), and resolution of QT prolongation (QTc 412 ms). From the patient’s perspective, she reported a resolution of the “inner restlessness” and fatigue, expressing significant relief to learn that her symptoms were somatic consequences of the medication rather than a psychiatric deterioration. The causality of the adverse drug reaction was assessed as “probable” for both escitalopram (score 7) and quetiapine (score 6) using the Naranjo Probability Scale (Naranjo et al., 1981). Furthermore, the drug-drug interaction between escitalopram and quetiapine regarding QTc prolongation was evaluated as “probable” (score 7) using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) (Horn et al., 2007). At the 1-month follow-up after discharge, the patient had discontinued all psychotropic medications. She was managed with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and psychological counseling, reporting stable anxiety symptoms and no recurrence of hyponatremia or palpitations.
Figure 1. Timeline of the clinical course and relevant laboratory parameters. The left y-axis represents serum sodium levels (blue line), and the right y-axis represents the QTc interval (red line). Key events include saline infusion (Day 1), drug discontinuation (Day 2), and recovery (Day 6). Note the “desalination phenomenon” on Day 1 and the parallel improvement of hyponatremia and QTc prolongation after drug withdrawal.
3 Discussion
The severe hyponatremia observed in this case resulted from the Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone secretion (SIADH), a well-documented but often underestimated adverse effect of serotonergic agents. The pathophysiology likely involves the overstimulation of central 5-HT2C and 5-HT7 receptors, which enhances the release of arginine vasopressin (ADH) and increases renal sensitivity to the hormone (Rottmann, 2007; Liu et al., 1996; Barclay and Lee, 2002). Clinically, this manifested in our patient not only as physical weakness but also as significant psychomotor agitation (described by the patient as “inability to sit still”), which is a hallmark of hyponatremic encephalopathy superimposed on serotonergic overstimulation (Tucci et al., 2020; Lane, 1998; Basu et al., 2014). While the initial clinical presentation mimicked dehydration, the diagnosis of SIADH was solidified by the characteristic “desalination phenomenon” observed on Day 1, where isotonic saline infusion paradoxically worsened the hyponatremia. This occurs because the kidney, under the influence of inappropriate ADH, excretes the infused sodium while retaining the free water (Steele et al., 1997; Musch and Decaux, 1998; Sterns and Silver, 2008). Furthermore, we utilized the diagnostic criteria established by Fenske et al. (Fenske et al., 2008), which suggest that hypouricemia and high fractional uric acid excretion are superior to serum parameters alone for distinguishing SIADH from volume-depleted states. Our patient’s profoundly low serum uric acid (76 μmol/L) and elevated urinary sodium (220 mmol/L) provided indisputable biochemical evidence of SIADH, ruling out hypovolemic etiologies.
A pivotal finding in this case is the discordance between the therapeutic dosage used (10 mg/day) and the severity of the toxicity, which can be elucidated by the patient’s pharmacogenetic profile. The patient carried the CYP2C19 *1/*2 genotype, classifying her as an Intermediate Metabolizer (IM). According to CPIC guidelines, IMs have reduced enzymatic activity, yet they are typically expected to tolerate standard starting doses (Bousman et al., 2023a; Hicks et al., 2017). However, clinical reality often diverges from genetic prediction due to “phenoconversion,” a phenomenon where an individual’s functional metabolic capacity is lower than their genotype suggests due to non-genetic factors (Klomp et al., 2020; de Jong et al., 2023; Scherf-Clavel et al., 2024; Darakjian et al., 2021; Mostafa et al., 2021; Lenoir et al., 2021; den et al., 2023). In this 51-year-old patient, low body weight (50 kg) and reduced muscle mass (indicated by a serum creatinine of 33 μmol/L) likely resulted in a smaller volume of distribution. However, given that the serum concentration was within the therapeutic range, the observed toxicity suggests a heightened pharmacodynamic sensitivity (individual vulnerability) rather than simple pharmacokinetic accumulation. A comparison with previously reported cases (Table 2) confirms that severe hyponatremia can precipitate even at low doses (e.g., 5 mg) (Kacperczyk et al., 2021; Prakash et al., 2021). In our case, the serum escitalopram concentration measured 72 h post-discontinuation was 5 ng/mL. Based on the elimination half-life of escitalopram (approx. 30 h), the back-calculated concentration at the time of admission would be approximately 20–30 ng/mL, which falls well within the consensus therapeutic reference range (15–80 ng/mL). This finding is pivotal: it confirms that the severe multi-organ toxicity was not caused by a supratherapeutic overdose, but rather represents “toxicity at therapeutic levels” driven by individual susceptibility. However, as notably shown in the table, most prior reports lack specific pharmacogenetic data or simultaneous cardiac safety monitoring. This distinguishes our case as a comprehensive documentation of how individual susceptibility—driven by the gene-environment interaction—outweighs dose magnitude as a predictor of toxicity.
Table 2. Review of reported cases of Citalopram/Escitalopram-induced SIADH: comparison of genotype availability and cardiac monitoring.
The concurrent cardiac toxicity observed—severe sinus bradycardia and QTc prolongation—highlights a critical “double-hit” pharmacodynamic interaction. While escitalopram is known to cause dose-dependent QT prolongation, recent evidence also links it to profound sinus bradycardia and sinus arrest, particularly in patients with underlying cardiovascular risks (Li et al., 2024; Ge et al., 2025). In our patient, the QTc interval of 570 ms was likely the result of a synergistic blockade of the hERG potassium channel by both escitalopram and quetiapine. Although the quetiapine dose was low (50 mg), its combination with an SSRI was assessed as a “probable” interaction (DIPS score 7) (Horn et al., 2007). Quetiapine, metabolized by CYP3A4, may exert a pharmacodynamic synergistic effect with escitalopram on hERG potassium channel blockade. In a patient with reduced metabolic clearance can precipitate significant repolarization delays (Kim et al., 2016; Hasnain et al., 2014). Crucially, the pro-arrhythmic risk was amplified by the severe electrolyte derangements (hyponatremia) associated with SIADH (Tamene et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2021; Yalta et al., 2024; Yong et al., 2011). Although recent mechanistic studies (Wu et al., 2021) have highlighted the complex and variable role of sodium modulation in cardiac electrophysiology (e.g., in masking specific genetic phenotypes), profound hyponatremia is widely recognized in clinical practice as a destabilizing factor that can exacerbate drug-induced repolarization delays. This case reinforces that the CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer status does not merely affect drug levels but can lower the threshold for multi-organ toxicity (neuro-cardiac) when multiple “minor” risk factors align.
In summary, this case challenges the assumption that therapeutic doses of SSRIs are intrinsically safe in patients without “poor metabolizer” genotypes. It demonstrates that severe SIADH and life-threatening arrhythmias can manifest simultaneously in CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, particularly when physiological reserves are diminished. Consequently, we advocate that for elderly or low-body-weight patients, who are already at high risk for drug-induced hyponatremia due to physiological decline and comorbidities (Capinha et al., 2025), particularly those requiring polypharmacy with potential cardiac risks, preemptive CYP2C19 genotyping and early therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) should be considered to prevent such “unexpected” toxicity (Hiemke et al., 2018).
In conclusion, this case underscores a critical clinical reality: life-threatening neuro-cardiac toxicity can manifest even at standard therapeutic dosages of escitalopram when specific pharmacogenetic and physiological vulnerabilities align. The severe SIADH and significant QTc prolongation observed in this 51-year-old patient challenge the conventional perception of SSRIs as benign agents, illustrating how the CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer status (*1/*2 genotype), compounded by low body mass and polypharmacy, can precipitate a functional “poor metabolizer” phenotype—a process known as phenoconversion. Furthermore, the concurrent use of low-dose quetiapine likely exerted a synergistic pharmacodynamic effect on cardiac repolarization, amplifying the arrhythmogenic risk created by the electrolyte derangements. Consequently, we advocate for a back-to-basics approach in the management of vulnerable populations. Since toxicity can manifest despite normal drug levels, clinical vigilance cannot rely solely on dosage guidelines or advanced testing; instead, early and rigorous monitoring of serum sodium and QTc intervals is essential. While TDM and pharmacogenetic screening are valuable tools for investigating complex cases (Pardiñas et al., 2021; Zanardi et al., 2021; Bousman et al., 2023b), routine biochemical and cardiac monitoring remain the most practical and effective strategies to prevent severe, unexpected adverse drug reactions in daily practice.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
Ethical approval was not required for the studies involving humans because Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. This is a retrospective case report describing the clinical course of a single patient receiving standard clinical care. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report (including all data and images). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
ZJ: Writing – original draft. XQ: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. ZY: Data curation, Resources, Writing – review and editing. JF: Software, Validation, Writing – review and editing. JL: Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. XZ: Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. WQ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This project was supported by the Science and Technological Innovation Project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Innovation Fund (grant no. CI2022C004-02 and CI2022C005) and High-Level Chinese Medical Hospital Promotion Project (grant no. HLCMHPP2023090).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Anderson, I. M. (2000). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability. J. Affective Disorders 58 (1), 19–36. doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00092-0
Barclay, T. S., and Lee, A. J. (2002). Citalopram-associated SIADH. Ann. Pharmacotherapy 36 (10), 1558–1563. doi:10.1345/aph.1C071
Basu, B., Gangopadhyay, T., Dutta, N., Mandal, B., De, S., and Mondal, S. (2014). A case of akathisia induced by escitalopram: case report and review of literature. Curr. Drug Safety 9 (1), 56–59. doi:10.2174/157488630901140224104651
Bousman, C. A., Stevenson, J. M., Ramsey, L. B., Sangkuhl, K., Hicks, J. K., Strawn, J. R., et al. (2023a). Clinical pharmacogenetics Implementation consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A genotypes and serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. Clin. Pharmacology Therapeutics 114 (1), 51–68. doi:10.1002/cpt.2903
Bousman, C. A., Maruf, A. A., Marques, D. F., Brown, L. C., and Müller, D. J. (2023b). The emergence, implementation, and future growth of pharmacogenomics in psychiatry: a narrative review. Psychol. Medicine 53 (16), 7983–7993. doi:10.1017/S0033291723002817
Capinha, M., Lavrador, M., Liberato, J., Pinheiro, A., Aveiro, A., Figueiredo, I. V., et al. (2025). Drug-induced hyponatremia: insights into pharmacological mechanisms and clinical practice management. J. Clinical Medicine 14 (18), 6584. doi:10.3390/jcm14186584
Chang, M., Tybring, G., Dahl, M. L., and Lindh, J. D. (2014). Impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms on citalopram/escitalopram exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Pharmacokinetics 53 (9), 801–811. doi:10.1007/s40262-014-0162-1
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Geddes, J. R., Higgins, J. P., Churchill, R., et al. (2009). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet London, Engl. 373 (9665), 746–758. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60046-5
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Chaimani, A., Atkinson, L. Z., Ogawa, Y., et al. (2018). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet London, Engl. 391 (10128), 1357–1366. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7
Darakjian, L., Deodhar, M., Turgeon, J., and Michaud, V. (2021). Chronic inflammatory status observed in patients with type 2 diabetes induces modulation of cytochrome P450 expression and activity. Int. Journal Molecular Sciences 22 (9), 4967. doi:10.3390/ijms22094967
Das, B., Ramasubbu, S. K., Agnihotri, A., Kumar, B., and Rawat, V. S. (2021). Leading 20 drug-drug interactions, polypharmacy, and analysis of the nature of risk factors due to QT interval prolonging drug use and potentially inappropriate psychotropic use in elderly psychiatry outpatients. Ther. Advances Cardiovascular Disease 15, 17539447211058892. doi:10.1177/17539447211058892
de Jong, L. M., Boussallami, S., Sánchez-López, E., Giera, M., Tushuizen, M. E., Hoekstra, M., et al. (2023). The impact of CYP2C19 genotype on phenoconversion by concomitant medication. Front. Pharmacology 14. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1201906
den, U., Manon, G., Wagelaar, K. R., Abdullah-Koolmees, H., Cahn, W., Wilting, I., et al. (2023). Pharmacogenetics and phenoconversion: the influence on side effects experienced by psychiatric patients. Front. Genetics 14, 1249164. doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1249164
Fenske, W., Störk, S., Koschker, A. C., Blechschmidt, A., Lorenz, D., Wortmann, S., et al. (2008). Value of fractional uric acid excretion in differential diagnosis of hyponatremic patients on diuretics. J. Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism 93 (8), 2991–2997. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0330
Ge, C.-J., Lei, L. L., Wang, S. L., and Hu, X. Q. (2025). Third-degree atrioventricular block induced by escitalopram and quetiapine in a patient with depression: a case report. Am. Journal Translational Research 17 (5), 4062–4066. doi:10.62347/JAKR2090
Hasnain, M., Howland, R. H., and Vieweg, W. V. R. (2013). Escitalopram and QTc prolongation. J. Psychiatry and Neuroscience JPN 38 (4), E11. doi:10.1503/jpn.130055
Hasnain, M., Vieweg, W. V. R., Howland, R. H., Kogut, C., Breden Crouse, E. L., Koneru, J. N., et al. (2014). Quetiapine, QTc interval prolongation, and torsade de pointes: a review of case reports. Ther. Advances Psychopharmacology 4 (3), 130–138. doi:10.1177/2045125313510194
Hicks, J. K., Sangkuhl, K., Swen, J. J., Ellingrod, V. L., Müller, D. J., Shimoda, K., et al. (2017). Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline (CPIC) for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of tricyclic antidepressants: 2016 update. Clin. Pharmacology Therapeutics 102 (1), 37–44. doi:10.1002/cpt.597
Hiemke, C., Bergemann, N., Clement, H. W., Conca, A., Deckert, J., Domschke, K., et al. (2018). Consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology: update 2017. Pharmacopsychiatry 51 (1-02), 9–62. doi:10.1055/s-0043-116492
Horn, J. R., Hansten, P. D., and Chan, L. N. (2007). Proposal for a new tool to evaluate drug interaction cases. Ann. Pharmacotherapy 41 (4), 674–680. doi:10.1345/aph.1H423
Jacob, S., and Spinler, S. A. (2006). Hyponatremia associated with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in older adults. Ann. Pharmacotherapy 40 (9), 1618–1622. doi:10.1345/aph.1G293
Jin, Y., Pollock, B. G., Frank, E., Cassano, G. B., Rucci, P., Müller, D. J., et al. (2010). Effect of age, weight, and CYP2C19 genotype on escitalopram exposure. J. Clinical Pharmacology 50 (1), 62–72. doi:10.1177/0091270009337946
Jukić, M. M., Haslemo, T., Molden, E., and Ingelman-Sundberg, M. (2018). Impact of CYP2C19 genotype on escitalopram exposure and therapeutic failure: a retrospective study based on 2,087 patients. Am. Journal Psychiatry 175 (5), 463–470. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050550
Kacperczyk, J., Perdyan, A., and Stompór, M. (2021). Drug-resistant hyponatremia after escitalopram intake: a series of two case reports. Ann. Geriatric Medicine Research 25 (3), 217–221. doi:10.4235/agmr.21.0062
Kim, A., Lim, K. S., Lee, H., Chung, H., Yoon, S. H., Yu, K. S., et al. (2016). A thorough QT study to evaluate the QTc prolongation potential of two neuropsychiatric drugs, quetiapine and escitalopram, in healthy volunteers. Int. Clinical Psychopharmacology 31 (4), 210–217. doi:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000124
Kim, Y., Kim, A., and Chung, J. Y. (2021). Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of delayed effect of escitalopram-induced QT prolongation. J. Affective Disorders 285, 120–126. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.048
Klomp, S. D., Manson, M. L., Guchelaar, H. J., and Swen, J. J. (2020). Phenoconversion of cytochrome P450 metabolism: a systematic review. J. Clinical Medicine 9 (9), 2890. doi:10.3390/jcm9092890
Lane, R. M. (1998). SSRI-Induced extrapyramidal side-effects and akathisia: implications for treatment. J. Psychopharmacology Oxf. Engl. 12 (2), 192–214. doi:10.1177/026988119801200212
Lenoir, C., Rollason, V., Desmeules, J. A., and Samer, C. F. (2021). Influence of inflammation on cytochromes P450 activity in adults: a systematic review of the literature. Front. Pharmacology 12, 733935. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.733935
Leth-Møller, K. B., Hansen, A. H., Torstensson, M., Andersen, S. E., Ødum, L., Gislasson, G., et al. (2016). Antidepressants and the risk of hyponatremia: a Danish register-based population study. BMJ Open 6 (5), e011200. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011200
Li, L.-C., Sun, W., Lv, X. Q., Xu, Y. Y., Hu, Y., and Shi, J. N. (2024). Escitalopram-induced sinus bradycardia in coronary heart disease combined with depression: a case report and review of literature. Front. Cardiovascular Medicine 10 (11 Jan), 1133662. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1133662
Liamis, G., Milionis, H., and Elisaf, M. (2008). A review of drug-induced hyponatremia. Am. Journal Kidney Diseases The Official Journal Natl. Kidney Found. 52 (1), 144–153. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.03.004
Liu, B. A., Mittmann, N., Knowles, S. R., and Shear, N. H. (1996). Hyponatremia and the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a review of spontaneous reports. CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. = J. de l'Association medicale Can. 155 (5), 519–527.
Matsuo, J., and Yamaori, S. (2022). Detecting drug-drug interactions that increase the incidence of long QT syndrome using a spontaneous reporting system. J. Clinical Pharmacy Therapeutics 47 (1), 70–80. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13539
Mostafa, S., Polasek, T. M., Sheffield, L. J., Huppert, D., and Kirkpatrick, C. M. J. (2021). Quantifying the impact of phenoconversion on medications with actionable pharmacogenomic guideline recommendations in an acute aged persons mental health setting. Front. Psychiatry 12, 724170. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.724170
Musch, W., and Decaux, G. (1998). Treating the syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion with isotonic saline. QJM Monthly Journal Assoc. Physicians 91 (11), 749–753. doi:10.1093/qjmed/91.11.749
Naranjo, C. A., Busto, U., Sellers, E. M., Sandor, P., Ruiz, I., Roberts, E. A., et al. (1981). A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin. Pharmacology Therapeutics 30 (2), 239–245. doi:10.1038/clpt.1981.154
Noehr-Jensen, L., Zwisler, S. T., Larsen, F., Sindrup, S. H., Damkier, P., Nielsen, F., et al. (2009). Impact of CYP2C19 phenotypes on escitalopram metabolism and an evaluation of pupillometry as a serotonergic biomarker. Eur. Journal Clinical Pharmacology 65 (9), 887–894. doi:10.1007/s00228-009-0657-0
Ojero-Senard, A., Benevent, J., Bondon-Guitton, E., Durrieu, G., Chebane, L., Araujo, M., et al. (2017). A comparative study of QT prolongation with serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Psychopharmacology 234 (20), 3075–3081. doi:10.1007/s00213-017-4685-7
Pardiñas, A. F., Owen, M. J., and Walters, J. T. R. (2021). Pharmacogenomics: a road ahead for precision medicine in psychiatry. Neuron 109 (24), 3914–3929. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.011
Peretti, S., Judge, R., and Hindmarch, I. (2000). Safety and tolerability considerations: tricyclic antidepressants vs. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 403, 17–25. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2000.tb10944.x
Prakash, J. K., Abhirami, M. T., Sri, G. N., Dalal, V. I., Swamy, A. H. M. V., Thomas, K., et al. (2021). Escitalopram-induced chronic euvolemic hyponatremia. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 12 (4), 180–182. doi:10.4103/jpp.jpp_102_21
Rief, W., Nestoriuc, Y., von Lilienfeld-Toal, A., Dogan, I., Schreiber, F., Hofmann, S. G., et al. (2009). Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Safety 32 (11), 1041–1056. doi:10.2165/11316580-000000000-00000
Rottmann, C. N. (2007). SSRIs and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Am. Journal Nursing 107 (1), 58–59. doi:10.1097/00000446-200701000-00022
Scherf-Clavel, M., Weber, H., Unterecker, S., Frantz, A., Eckert, A., Reif, A., et al. (2024). The relevance of integrating CYP2C19 phenoconversion effects into clinical pharmacogenetics. Pharmacopsychiatry 57 (2), 69–77. doi:10.1055/a-2248-6924
Schoretsanitis, G., Paulzen, M., Unterecker, S., Schwarz, M., Conca, A., Zernig, G., et al. (2018). TDM in psychiatry and neurology: a comprehensive summary of the consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology, update 2017; a tool for clinicians. World Journal Biological Psychiatry The Official Journal World Fed. Soc. Biol. Psychiatry 19 (3), 162–174. doi:10.1080/15622975.2018.1439595
Steele, A., Gowrishankar, M., Abrahamson, S., Mazer, C. D., Feldman, R. D., and Halperin, M. L. (1997). Postoperative hyponatremia despite near-isotonic saline infusion: a phenomenon of desalination. Ann. Internal Medicine 126 (1), 20–25. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-1-199701010-00003
Sterns, R. H., and Silver, S. M. (2008). Cerebral salt wasting versus SIADH: what difference? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 19 (2), 194–196. doi:10.1681/ASN.2007101118
Tamene, A., Sattiraju, S., Wang, K., and Benditt, D. G. (2010). Brugada-like electrocardiography pattern induced by severe hyponatraemia. Eur. Eur. Pacing, Arrhythmias, Cardiac Electrophysiology Journal Working Groups Cardiac Pacing, Arrhythmias, Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology Eur. Soc. Cardiol. 12 (6), 905–907. doi:10.1093/europace/euq034
Tsai, M.-H., Lin, K. M., Hsiao, M. C., Shen, W. W., Lu, M. L., Tang, H. S., et al. (2010). Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 enzymes influence metabolism of the antidepressant escitalopram and treatment response. Pharmacogenomics 11 (4), 537–546. doi:10.2217/pgs.09.168
Tsai, P.-H., Chen, H. C., Liao, S. C., Tseng, M. C. M., and Lee, M. B. (2012). Recurrent escitalopram-induced hyponatremia in an elderly woman with dementia with lewy bodies. General Hospital Psychiatry 34 (1), 101.e5–101.e7. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.06.007
Tucci, V., Calvo, J. A., Moukaddam, N., Waheed, A., and Wilson, M. P. (2020). Psychiatric emergencies for clinicians: emergency department management of acute drug-induced akathisia. J. Emergency Medicine 58 (6), 922–926. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.03.028
US Food and Drug Administration (2011). FDA drug safety communication: abnormal heart rhythms associated with high doses of celexa (citalopram hydrobromide). FDA.Gov. Available online at: www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-abnormal-heart-rhythms-associated-high-doses-celexa-citalopram (Accessed December 26, 2025).
Wu, X., Hoeker, G. S., Blair, G. A., King, D. R., Gourdie, R. G., Weinberg, S. H., et al. (2021). Hypernatremia and intercalated disc edema synergistically exacerbate long-QT syndrome type 3 phenotype. Am. Journal Physiology. Heart Circulatory Physiology 321 (6), H1042–H1055. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00366.2021
Yalta, K., Palabıyık, O., Gurdogan, M., and Yetkın, E. (2024). Hyponatremia and takotsubo syndrome: a review of pathogenetic and clinical implications. Heart Failure Reviews 29 (1), 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10741-023-10344-z
Yong, T. Y., Huang, J. E., Lau, S. Y., and Li, J. Y. (2011). Severe hyponatremia and other electrolyte disturbances associated with indapamide. Curr. Drug Safety 6 (3), 134–137. doi:10.2174/157488611797579249
Yu, B.-N., Chen, G. L., He, N., Ouyang, D. S., Chen, X. P., Liu, Z. Q., et al. (2003). Pharmacokinetics of citalopram in relation to genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19. Drug Metabolism Disposition The Biological Fate Chemicals 31 (10), 1255–1259. doi:10.1124/dmd.31.10.1255
Keywords: CYP2C19, drug safety, escitalopram, phenoconversion, QTc prolongation, SIADH
Citation: Jiang Z, Qu X, Yan Z, Fang J, Lan J, Zhao X and Qi W (2026) Case Report: Severe SIADH and QTc prolongation induced by escitalopram-quetiapine interaction in a CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer at therapeutic doses. Front. Pharmacol. 17:1776959. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1776959
Received: 28 December 2025; Accepted: 22 January 2026;
Published: 30 January 2026.
Edited by:
Karel Allegaert, KU Leuven, BelgiumCopyright © 2026 Jiang, Qu, Yan, Fang, Lan, Zhao and Qi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xin Zhao, cmlja2FkZGlzb25AMTYzLmNvbQ==; Wensheng Qi, cXdzMTk2MzA4MjNAMTYzLmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Wensheng Qi2*