REVIEW article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics
From Standard to Individualized Diazoxide Therapy in Congenital Hyperinsulinism: A Narrative Review
Teresa Wong 1
Daniel Chan 2,3
Cherie Chua 2,3
Wenqi Cher 4,3
Wan Xuan Selina Lim 1
Suresh Chandran 5,3
Fabian Yap 2,3
1. Department of Pharmacy, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
2. Endocrinology Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
3. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
4. Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
5. Department of Neonatology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Purpose Congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI) is the commonest cause of persistent hypoglycaemia in neonates and infants (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L in first 2-3 days of life; <3.5 mmol/L after 3 days of life). Diazoxide demonstrates variable efficacy depending on the underlying genetic variant and clinical phenotype. Diazoxide has been associated with side effects that are likely dose dependent. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on diazoxide's pharmacokinetics and side effect profile to support the development of individualised dosing strategies guided by genotype and patient-specific risk factors, with the aim of optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing adverse effects. Methodology A structured PubMed search was performed to review diazoxide use in hyperinsulinism. Articles not involving neonatal hyperinsulinism, not specifying diazoxide dosing or focusing on alternative therapies were excluded. Addition articles were identified through reference screening or hand searched. Results Traditional diazoxide dosing (5–15 mg/kg/day) is being challenged by emerging evidence supporting the benefits of lower starting doses (2–5 mg/kg/day), particularly in neonates with transient hyperinsulinism (HI) or specific genetic variants such as HNF1A and HNF4A. Lower starting doses in selected CHI patients have been shown to achieve adequate glycaemic control with fewer complications, including pulmonary hypertension (PH) and fluid retention. Diazoxide-responsiveness correlates strongly with the underlying molecular etiology. ABCC8 and KCNJ11 gene mutations often predict diazoxide-unresponsiveness, whereas GLUD1, HADH, and other variants typically predict responsiveness. Early predictors of unresponsiveness include large for gestational age (LGA) status (unrelated to maternal diabetes), early neonatal onset, and the need for high glucose infusion rates (GIR). Risk factors for adverse effects include renal impairment, prematurity, and low albumin levels, which may increase free diazoxide concentrations and drug toxicity. Conclusion Individualized dosing based on clinical phenotype and genotype can improve safety and effectiveness in CHI management. Lower initial doses are recommended in patients with propensity for diazoxide sensitivity or risk factors for adverse events, while more rapid escalation may be warranted in suspected diazoxide-resistant cases.
Summary
Keywords
congenital hyperinsulinism, Diazoxide, dosing, neonate, Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic
Received
05 January 2026
Accepted
19 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Wong, Chan, Chua, Cher, Lim, Chandran and Yap. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Teresa Wong
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.