Abstract
Introduction:
Core psychopathy is characterized by grandiosity, callousness, manipulativeness, and lack of remorse, empathy, and guilt. It is often comorbid with conduct disorder and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Psychopathy is present in forensic as well as prison and general populations. In recent years, an increasing amount of neuroimaging studies has been conducted in order to elucidate the obscure neurobiological etiology of psychopathy. The studies have yielded heterogenous results, and no consensus has been reached.
Aims:
This study systematically reviewed and qualitatively summarized functional and structural neuroimaging studies conducted on individuals with psychopathic traits. Furthermore, this study aimed to evaluate whether the findings from different MRI modalities could be reconciled from a neuroanatomical perspective.
Materials and Methods:
After the search and auditing processes, 118 neuroimaging studies were included in this systematic literature review. The studies consisted of structural, functional, and diffusion tensor MRI studies.
Results:
Psychopathy was associated with numerous neuroanatomical abnormalities. Structurally, gray matter anomalies were seen in frontotemporal, cerebellar, limbic, and paralimbic regions. Associated gray matter volume (GMV) reductions were most pronounced particularly in most of the prefrontal cortex, and temporal gyri including the fusiform gyrus. Also decreased GMV of the amygdalae and hippocampi as well the cingulate and insular cortices were associated with psychopathy, as well as abnormal morphology of the hippocampi, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens. Functionally, psychopathy was associated with dysfunction of the default mode network, which was also linked to poor moral judgment as well as deficient metacognitive and introspective abilities. Second, reduced white matter integrity in the uncinate fasciculus and dorsal cingulum were associated with core psychopathy. Third, emotional detachment was associated with dysfunction of the posterior cerebellum, the human mirror neuron system and the Theory of Mind denoting lack of empathy and persistent failure in integrating affective information into cognition.
Conclusions:
Structural and functional aberrancies involving the limbic and paralimbic systems including reduced integrity of the uncinate fasciculus appear to be associated with core psychopathic features. Furthermore, this review points towards the idea that ASPD and psychopathy might stem from divergent biological processes.
Introduction
Psychopathy is linked to biological processes in the brain, and is a highly heritable disorder (). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have provided means to investigate these processes, but both the results and the definition of psychopathy have been heterogenic (–). Features and behaviors, such as lack of empathy, remorse, and guilt as well as manipulativeness, callousness, and grandiosity comprise the core psychopathic traits. Antisocial conduct is often comorbid with these core traits, which together are referred as to psychopathy (–).
The display of psychopathic behaviors is a reliable predictor for poor academic achievement, criminality, behavioral problems, and for adverse psychosocial consequences and mental health (, ). The prevalence of psychopathy is approximately 1% in the general population (, ), 3% in forensic population (), 4% amongst corporate managers (), and 20% in prison population (). Furthermore, conduct disorder (CD) is often present amongst the majority of offenders with clinical psychopathy before the age of fifteen, and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) after the age of eighteen (). The PCL-R superordinate interpersonal-affective factor of psychopathy is not a prerequisite for CD and ASPD, but they are, however, often comorbid (). Moreover, psychopaths having successfully avoided criminal conviction are sometimes referred to as successful psychopaths (). However, in this context, the word “successful” does not imply success in other aspects of life ().
Psychopathy is believed to have a neurobiological origin (), and, in the past years, various neuroimaging studies have tried to resolve the perplexing etiology behind psychopathy (, , ). The structure, connectivity, and white matter tracts of brains of individuals displaying psychopathic traits have been visualized with numerous methods including conventional MRI, functional MRI, diffusion tensor MRI (DTI) voxel-based morphometry (VBM), (), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and electroencephalogram (EEG) ().
Despite an increase in neuroimaging studies in this field, there is no systematic review summarizing structural MRI, functional MRI, and DTI findings to date. Previous reviews have yielded inconsistent results [see e.g. (, , )]. Diversity in sample demographics and characteristics as well as variation in task designs and imaging techniques make the interpretation and generalization of neuroimaging results difficult (). Put differently, the functions, structures, and interconnections of brain regions associated with psychopathy remain unclear. A qualitative summary covering the three radiological submodalities might facilitate our understanding of psychopathy, and give insight to its neurobiological correlates and obscure neurobiological etiology.
Aim
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on MRI neuroimaging of psychopathic traits, to summarize findings from different MRI modalities that cover different aspects of neural function and structure, and to examine whether these aspects were consistent.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
This study is a systematic literature review on MRI neuroimaging of psychopathic traits, conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement ().
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
For inclusion in the study, the record must have been published in a peer-reviewed journal in English, Finnish or Swedish. Because psychopathy is prevalent in various populations and both genders, we also included community samples in addition to prison and forensic populations. Consequently, both genders were included in our study. Furthermore, most records use PCL-R (–) as the measure of psychopathy, but records with PCL-R derived instruments were also included.
If the sample mean age was less than 17.50 years, the record was excluded. This criterion applied to both affected subjects and control groups. This criterion resulted in exclusion of early adolescence studies, but allowed room for late adolescence studies.
Data Collection
The following databases were accessed to acquire records for study: PubMed (NCBI), Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), PsycARTICLES (Ovid), Embase, and Criminal Justice Abstracts (EBSCO). The search was executed on the 4th of February 2019. Apart from categorical psychopathy, search strings, such as callous-unemotional traits, conduct disorder, and antisocial behavior, were used in order to encapsulate the dimensional continuum of psychopathy. The search strings and methods are available in Supplementary Materials.
The screened records (n = 526) were rated for either inclusion or exclusion by three independent assessors at the Niuvanniemi Hospital (BM Mika Johanson and forensic psychiatrics MD Olli Vaurio, and MD, PhD Markku Lähteenvuo). The initial interrater reliability for inclusion and exclusion was estimated with Fleiss' Kappa, reaching a Kappa value of 0.942 and an initial agreement percent across the raters of 97.34%. All articles with initial disagreement were re-rated within the group, and a decision for either inclusion or exclusion was made in consensus. As a result, a total of 118 records were included in the study and 408 excluded (Figure 1). The characteristics and key findings of each included study are summarized in the Review Matrix (Table S1). Excluded records with reasons for exclusion are available in Table S2.
Figure 1
Coding and Analysis
Data from the included records (n = 118) were extracted and coded to form the review matrix (Table S1). The coded data included author and year of the record, type, and design of the study, sample characteristics, exclusion criteria, covariates, behavioral measures, MRI modality and method, and key findings. Every record was assigned with a unique and corresponding number. Type and design of the study included also the mean psychopathy score for the sample. Sample characteristics included sample size, mean age, and percentage of females. Based on the data in the review, matrix, functional, structural, and diffusion tensor MRI findings that correlated with psychopathy dimensionally or categorically, were compiled to Table 1. Findings that correlated with core psychopathy only were compiled to Table 2.
Table 1
| No | Record | Method | AMY | HIP | INS | CG | PFC | TEMP | FUSI | PAR | OCC | CAU | PUT | CB | VS | WMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | Baskin-Sommers et al. () | S | g- | g- | ||||||||||||
| 17 | Bertsch et al. () | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||||
| 1 | Boccardi et al. () | S | m ↓g- | |||||||||||||
| 22 | Boccardi et al. () | S | m ↑g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | |||||||
| 11 | Boccardi et al. () | S | m | m | ↓g m | |||||||||||
| 40 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. () | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||
| 38 | Cope et al. () | S | g- | g- | g+ | g+ | g- | g- | g+ | |||||||
| 85 | de Oliveira-Souza et al. () | S | ↓g | g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | ||||||||||
| 51 | Ermer et al. () | S | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | |||||||||
| 16 | Fairchild et al. () | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↑g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | |||||||
| 48 | Glenn et al. () | S | ↑g+ | ↑g+ | ||||||||||||
| 95 | Gregory et al. () | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||||
| 105 | Howner et al. () | S | ↓g- | |||||||||||||
| 45 | Korponay et al. () | S | ↑g+ | ↑g+ | ||||||||||||
| 46 | Korponay et al. () | S | ↑g+ | |||||||||||||
| 75 | Laakso et al. () | S | ↓g | |||||||||||||
| 12 | Leutgeb et al. () | S | ↓g | ↑g | ↑g | |||||||||||
| 24 | Ly et al. () | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||
| 53 | Miskovich et al. () | S | m- | m- | m- | |||||||||||
| 41 | Müller et al. () | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | |||||||||||
| 60 | Pardini et al. () | S | ↓g- | |||||||||||||
| 21 | Raine et al. () | S | ↑w CR, CC | |||||||||||||
| 42 | Raine et al. () | S | m | |||||||||||||
| 43 | Sato et al. () | S | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | |||||||||||
| 13 | Tiihonen et al. () | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g ↑w | ↑w | ↑g ↑w | ||||||
| 78 | Vieira et al. () | S | ↓g- | ↑g+ | ↑g+ | ↓g- | ||||||||||
| 59 | Yang et al. () | S | ↓g | |||||||||||||
| 62 | Yang et al. () | S | ↓g m | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||||
| 28 | Anderson et al. () | F | a+ | a+ | a+/− | |||||||||||
| 76 | Bjork et al. () | F | a+ | |||||||||||||
| 30 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. () | F | ↓a ↓c | ↑a ↓c | ↓c | ↓c | ↑a ↓c | |||||||||
| 40 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. () | F | ↓c | ↓c | ↑c ↓c | |||||||||||
| 83 | Cope et al. () | F | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a− | a− | a− | ↑a | ↑a− | ↑a | |||||
| 6 | Decety et al. () | F | ↑a+/− ↑↓c | ↑a ↓c | ↑a+/− ↓c | ↑a ↓c | ↑a | |||||||||
| 14 | Decety et al. () | F | ↑a+ | ↑a− | ↑a+/− | ↑a+/− | ↑a+/− | |||||||||
| 71 | Decety et al. () | F | ↑a | ↑a+ | ↑a− | a− | ↑a− | a− | ↑a− | a− | ||||||
| 39 | Deeley et al. () | F | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | |||||||
| 82 | Deming et al. () | F | ↑a | ↑↓a | ↑a | ↑↓a | ||||||||||
| 81 | Ewbank et al. () | F | ↓a c− | c− | ||||||||||||
| 33 | Fede et al. () | F | a− | a− | ||||||||||||
| 63 | Geurts et al. () | F | ↑c | ↑a ↑c | ||||||||||||
| 9 | Glenn et al. () | F | a+ | a+/− | a+/− | a+/− | ||||||||||
| 87 | Gregory et al. () | F | ↑a+ | ↓a | ↑a | |||||||||||
| 56 | Harenski et al. () | F | a− | a− | ↑a | |||||||||||
| 64 | Harenski et al. () | F | a− | av | ||||||||||||
| 31 | Hosking et al. () | F | cv | c− a+ | ||||||||||||
| 4 | Hyde et al. () | F | a− | |||||||||||||
| 50 | Juárez et al. () | F | c− | c+/− | c+/− | c+/− | c+/− | c− | ||||||||
| 58 | Kiehl et al. () | F | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ||||||||
| 45 | Korponay et al. () | F | c− | c− | ||||||||||||
| 96 | Larson et al. () | F | ↓a | ↑a | ||||||||||||
| 10 | Lindner et al. () | F | c+ | c+ | c+ | c+ | ||||||||||
| 99 | Marsh & Cardinale () | F | a− | a− | a+ | a− | ||||||||||
| 57 | Mier et al. () | F | ↓c | ↓c | ↓a | |||||||||||
| 89 | Motzkin et al. () | F | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | |||||||||||
| 55 | Müller et al. () | F | ↑a | ↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑a | |||||
| 3 | Osumi et al. () | F | c− a− | c− | a− c− | a− | c− a− | c− | ||||||||
| 15 | Pera-Guardiola et al. () | F | ↓g | |||||||||||||
| 54 | Philippi et al. () | F | ↓c− | ↓c− | ↓c− | |||||||||||
| 66 | Pujara et al. () | F | a+/− g+ | |||||||||||||
| 18 | Pujol et al. () | F | ↓a | ↓a− ↓c | ↓a ↓c | a− | ↓a | |||||||||
| 67 | Rilling et al. () | F | ↓a− | a+/− | ||||||||||||
| 8 | Shao and Lee () | F | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | |||||||||||
| 47 | Sommer et al. () | F | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | |||||||||||
| 32 | Vieira et al. () | F | ↑a | ↑a | ||||||||||||
| 70 | Yoder et al. () | F | ↓a− ↓c− | ↓a− | ↑a+ | ↑a+ ↑↓c+/− | ↑↓a+/− ↓c− | ↑a+ ↓c− | ↓a− | ↓a− | ↓a− | ↓a− ↓c− | ↑a+ ↓c− | ↓a− | ||
| 65 | Zijlmans et al. () | F | a+ | a+ | ||||||||||||
| 102 | Hoppenbrouwers et al. () | DTI | ↓FA UF ↓FA IFOF ↓FA ATR ↓FA CG | |||||||||||||
| 89 | Motzkin et al. () | DTI | ↓FA UF | |||||||||||||
| 37 | Sethi et al. () | DTI | ↓FA CG- | |||||||||||||
| 84 | Sobhani et al. () | DTI | ↓FA UF- | |||||||||||||
| 103 | Sundram et al. () | DTI | ↓FA & ↑MD CC ↓FA IC ↓FA & ↑MD IFOF ↓FA & ↑MD ACR ↓FA & ↑MD UF ↓FA ILF ↓FA PTR | |||||||||||||
| 49 | Wolf et al. () | DTI | ↓FA UF- |
Key neuroanatomical areas affected in psychopathy categorically and dimensionally. The records are grouped by method. Dimensional correlations in terms of total psychopathy score are shown.
AMY, amygdala; HIP, hippocampus including parahippocampal gyri; INS, insula; CG, cingulate gyrus including cingulate cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; TEMP, temporal cortex; FUSI, fusiform gyrus; PAR, parietal cortex; OCC, occipital cortex; PUT, putamen; CAU, caudate; CB, cerebellum; VS, ventral striatum including nucleus accumbens; WMT, white matter tract; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CC, corpus callosum; CG, cingulum; CR, corona radiata; IC, internal capsule; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; PTR, posterior thalamic radiation; UF, uncinate fasciculus; S, structural; F, functional; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; up-and down-arrow denote increase or decrease, respectively; c, functional connectivity; a, activity; g, gray matter volume; w, white matter volume; plus and minus signs denote direction of relationship with psychopathy.
Table 2
| No | Record | Method | AMY | HIP | INS | ACC | PFC | TEMP | CB | DS | WMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | Baskin-Sommers et al. () | S | g- | g- | |||||||
| 93 | Cohn et al. () | S | g- | g- | |||||||
| 40 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. () | S | g- | g- | g- | g- | g- | ||||
| 38 | Cope et al. () | S | g+ | g- | g- | g+ | |||||
| 85 | de Oliveira-Souza et al. () | S | g- | g- | g- | ||||||
| 16 | Fairchild et al. () | S | g- | ||||||||
| 48 | Glenn et al. () | S | g+ | ||||||||
| 105 | Howner et al. () | S | g- | ||||||||
| 45 | Korponay et al. () | S | g+ | ||||||||
| 86 | Lam et al. () | S | g- | g- | |||||||
| 12 | Leutgeb et al. () | S | g- | g+ | |||||||
| 53 | Miskovich et al. () | S | m- | ||||||||
| 60 | Pardini et al. () | S | g- | ||||||||
| 78 | Vieira et al. () | S | g- | g+ | |||||||
| 59 | Yang et al. () | S | g- | ||||||||
| 28 | Anderson et al. () | F | a+ | a+ | |||||||
| 79 | Anderson et al. () | F | a− | a− | a− | a− | a− | a− | a− | ||
| 27 | Cohn et al. () | F | c+ | ||||||||
| 30 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. () | F | a+ | ||||||||
| 40 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. () | F | c+ | ||||||||
| 83 | Cope et al. () | F | a+ | a+ | a+ | a+ | |||||
| 6 | Decety et al. () | F | a− | a− | a+/− | a+ | |||||
| 14 | Decety et al. () | F | a+ | a+ | a+/− | a+/− | |||||
| 71 | Decety et al. () | F | a+ | a+/− | a− | ||||||
| 97 | Freeman et al. () | F | a+ | ||||||||
| 77 | Fullam et al. () | F | av | ||||||||
| 9 | Glenn et al. () | F | a+ | a+/− | |||||||
| 56 | Harenski et al. () | F | a− | ||||||||
| 64 | Harenski et al. () | F | a− | ||||||||
| 31 | Hosking et al. () | F | c− | ||||||||
| 10 | Lindner et al. () | F | c+ | c+ | |||||||
| 94 | Murray et al. () | F | a− | ||||||||
| 54 | Philippi et al. () | F | c− | ||||||||
| 69 | Schiffer et al. () | F | a− | ||||||||
| 72 | Seara-Cardoso et al. () | F | a− | ||||||||
| 7 | Seara-Cardoso et al. () | F | a− | ||||||||
| 35 | Vieira et al. () | F | a− | ||||||||
| 5 | Yoder et al. () | F | c− | c− | a− | a− | |||||
| 70 | Yoder et al. () | F | a− | a+ | a+ | a− | a+ | ||||
| 65 | Zijlmans et al. () | F | a− | a− | |||||||
| 102 | Hoppenbrouwers et al. () | DTI | FA UF- FA IFOF- FA ATR- | ||||||||
| 80 | Pape et al. () | DTI | AD CT+ | ||||||||
| 37 | Sethi et al. () | DTI | FA CG- | ||||||||
| 49 | Wolf et al. () | DTI | FA UF- |
Key neuroanatomical regions and their correlation to interpersonal-affective dimensions of psychopathy only.
AMY, amygdala; HIP, hippocampus including parahippocampal gyri; INS, insula; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex (including parts of middle and posterior cingulate cortex); PFC, prefrontal cortex; TEMP, temporal cortex including fusiform gyrus; CB, cerebellum; DS, dorsal striatum; WMT, white matter tract; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CG, cingulum; CT, corticospinal tract; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; UF, uncinate fasciculus; S, structural; F, functional; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; c, functional connectivity; a, activity; g, gray matter volume; plus and minus signs denote direction of relationship with core psychopathy.
Apart from the review matrix, the records were divided into three groups based on whether they aimed to investigate the neural correlates of (i) psychopathy or psychopathic traits, (ii) ASPD, or (iii) CD. The included studies were further divided into structural, functional, and diffusion tensor MRI studies (Figure 2). Due to the great number of functional neuroimaging studies of psychopathy, these studies were grouped according to task or setting into six groups (Table S3), in order to simplify the summarization process. The six groups were (i) fairness, (ii) moral issue, (iii) viewing affective content, (iv) reward, (v) lying and deception, and (vi) default mode network. The default mode network refers to interconnected areas in the brain, the activity of which reduces in goal-oriented tasks. The areas comprise of ventro- and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and lateral parietal cortex (). Normal function of the default mode network is associated with self-referential (), affective (), and moral cognitive abilities (, ).
Figure 2
Results
Several aberrancies were reported in the psychopathic brain in structural, functional, and diffusion tensor imaging studies. The neuroanatomical regions with most reported aberrancies in individuals with psychopathic traits categorically or dimensionally as a function of total psychopathy score are summarized in Table 1. Further, findings correlating with core psychopathy, i.e. interpersonal-affective dimensions only, are summarized in Table 2. These areas comprised to great extent of frontotemporal and limbic regions. These areas are also illustrated in Figure 3. The prefrontal correlates marked in Table 2 are divided into functional and anatomical subregions in Table S4.
Figure 3
Findings regarding psychopathy are presented first in order of modality. Thereafter, findings related to ASPD and CD are presented and compared to those of psychopathy.
Structural Gray Matter Findings in Psychopathy
Structurally, aberrancies were described mostly in terms of gray matter volume (GMV) reductions. For a brief summary of implicated brain regions, please see Table S5. Moreover and intriguingly, “successful psychopaths” did not show any significant GMV loss compared to healthy controls, whereas their “unsuccessful” counterparts showed prominent losses (
Prefrontal Cortex
Decreased GMV was reported in several areas of the prefrontal cortex: orbitofrontal cortex (
Temporal Cortex
Decreases in GMV were seen in the temporal regions (
Parietal Cortex
A decrease in GMV in the parietal cortices were reported in two notable areas: the precuneus (
Occipital Cortex
The reported GMV reductions in the occipital cortex appeared to be of general nature (
Limbic Structures
Several regions of the limbic system, the orbitofrontal cortex included (
The amygdalae showed decreased GMV in psychopathy (
In addition to the amygdalae, the hippocampi (
Decreased GMV was reported in the subdivisions of the cingulate cortex including the anterior cingulate cortex (
Also, the insular cortex showed reduced GMV in psychopathy (
Basal Ganglia
Psychopathy may be accompanied by increased total striatum volume (
Cerebellum
Increased GMV (
Functional MRI Findings in Psychopathy
Fairness
In functional MRI studies with game-related tasks, psychopathic subjects exhibited reduced amygdalar activity in unfair versus fair conditions (
Morality
Several studies implicated dysfunction of the limbic system in psychopathy in the context of moral evaluations (
Moral severity ratings were correlated with increased activity in the right posterior temporal cortex in psychopathic subjects, whereas in the control group ratings were associated with increased activity in the amygdala (
Default Mode Network
In a great number of studies, the focus lay on investigating connectivity changes of the default mode network. The studies argued further that dysfunction of the default mode network is a key element in psychopathy (
Lying and Deception
Psychopathic subjects showed increased performance in deception and lying (
Emotional Detachment
Psychopathic subjects showed decreased ability to recognize and process emotions (
Somewhat divergent from these findings, firstly, PCL-R score positively correlated with success rate in identifying certain emotions in a study by Decety, Chen, Harenski, and Kiehl (
The role of amygdala in emotion processing in psychopathy appears inconsistent. Community samples showed that amygdalar hypoactivity was associated with CU traits in processing both positive and negative emotions (
Mier and colleagues (
In response to pain depicting scenarios, psychopathic subjects showed attenuated activation of also other empathy-related regions including ventromedial prefrontal cortex, periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), and lateral orbitofrontal cortex (
Reward Circuitry
A number of studies reported aberrancies in the reward circuitry in psychopathy. Hosking and colleagues (
Diffusion Tensor MRI Findings in Psychopathy
The integrity of white matter structures appeared to play a pivotal role in psychopathy. Several studies showed reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in the uncinate fasciculus on the right side (
In addition to the uncinate fasciculus, aberrancies in other various white matter structures were reported. Sethi and colleagues (
Structural Gray Matter Findings in ASPD
Similar to psychopathy, ASPD was associated with gray matter aberrancies in the limbic and cortical areas. Decreased GMV was noted in anterior cingulate cortex (
Functional MRI Findings in ASPD
Tang et al. (131) investigated resting-state neural activity in ASPD and found that ASPD subjects showed decreased activity in the posterior cerebellum and middle frontal gyrus (MFG). Contrariwise, ASPD subjects showed increased activity in the middle occipital gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, and inferior occipital gyrus (130). Similarly, Liu, Liao, Jiang, and Wang (132) found decreased activity in the posterior cerebellum, but also in temporal areas and in the orbitofrontal cortex. Recently, Kolla and colleagues (133, 134) noted that monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) genotype was associated with ASPD. High activity MAOA subjects showed increased resting-state functional connectivity between caudate, frontopolar cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex compared to low activity MAOA subjects and healthy controls. The researchers also found that instrumental aggression and functional connectivity from the ventral striatum to the precuneus had an inverse correlation in the low activity MAOA subjects, and a positive correlation to the angular gyrus (134). Increased corticostriatal resting-state connectivity was also described in psychopathic individuals (
Aberrant neural correlates were also found at task. Firstly, Kumari et al. (135) found that ASPD individuals showed decreased activity in the left frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus in an n-back setting. Secondly, decreased activity in the thalamus was noted in a NoGo condition suggesting impaired control inhibition (136). In a similar vein, Schiffer et al. (
In a facial emotion processing condition, Hyde, Votruba-Drzal, Hariri, and Manuck (
Diffusion Tensor MRI Findings in ASPD
Akin to psychopathy, decreased FA was seen in the uncinate fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, and anterior thalamic radiation in ASPD (
Structural Gray Matter Findings in CD
CD was associated partly with similar GMV reductions as were seen in psychopathy including amygdala, insula, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, fusiform gyrus, and inferior and superior occipital cortex (
Functional MRI Findings in CD
The few functional neuroimaging studies of CD included in this review yielded results quite similar to those in psychopathy. Firstly, resting-state functional connectivity analysis revealed aberrancies in the default mode and salience networks, and also in the frontoparietal network. CU traits were associated with increased connectivity in the left frontopolar cortex within the default mode network. In turn, impulsivity was associated with increased connectivity in the left IFG within the frontoparietal network as well as the left amygdala within the salience network (
Diffusion Tensor MRI Findings in CD
In a study by Lindner et al. (
Discussion
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on MRI neuroimaging of psychopathic traits, to summarize findings from different MRI modalities that cover different aspects of neural function and structure, and to examine whether these aspects were consistent. A total of 118 records were included in the study. The records consisted mainly of neuroimaging of clinical psychopathy, but also of non-clinical psychopathic traits, antisocial personality disorder, and conduct disorder. Both structurally and functionally, most aberrancies were described in frontotemporal regions as well as in limbic and paralimbic structures.
Psychopathic individuals exhibited decreased GMV in frontotemporal, limbic, paralimbic, and cerebellar structures. Although findings indicated both reduced GMV and abnormal morphology of the hippocampus, evidence for enlargement of the temporal horns in psychopathy was not found nor was it investigated in particular. The temporal horns of the lateral ventricles lie adjacent to the hippocampi. Thus, decreased volumes in hippocampi can inversely correlate with that of temporal horns (143). Temporal horn enlargement has been implicated in some psychiatric diagnoses including Alzheimer disease (144) and schizophrenia (145). Moreover, global GMV of psychopathic individuals does not appear to significantly differ from that of general population (
Dysfunction of the default mode network was found. This was anticipated as the default mode network consists of areas overlapping the limbic and paralimbic regions including the temporoparietal junction, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and medial prefrontal cortex (
Furthermore, findings from DTI studies corroborate the aforesaid notions. The uncinate fasciculus was the white matter tract with most anomalies in terms of decreased FA. The uncinate fasciculus connects the amygdala to ventromedial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex and is ostensibly responsible for several cognitive and affective functions that are erring in psychopathy including moral judgment, empathy, value representation, and stimulus-reinforced learning (
These findings are in accordance with the recently proposed Impaired Integration Theory (IIT) (156). The IIT attempts to integrate psychopathic manifestations, such as emotional detachment and impaired ability to incorporate perceived information into operant and contextual learning, with brain abnormalities inherent to psychopathy (156).
Interestingly, empathy-related regions in the brain were active in psychopathic subjects when imagining oneself in pain (
Psychopathic individuals display lack of empathy and affective cognition, and they might even be unconquerable by love. The mesolimbic reward system, together with limbic and paralimbic system, contribute to the feeling of romantic love (160). All these three systems were dysfunctional in psychopathy. In addition, according to a recent qualitative study of former spouses to psychopathic individuals per the PCL-R, the former spouses were repeatedly subjected to coercion, conning, and manipulation (161). We speculate that psychopathic individuals might not be capable of romantic love, based on the notion that love and desire are two neuroanatomically and fundamentally separate entities (160). Data on this topic are scarce, and the topic opens up interesting opportunities for future studies.
Also, intriguingly, aberrant cerebellar function and structure were reported in psychopathy. Beyond the cerebellum's traditional role in motor functions, an increasing amount of evidence indicates that the cerebellum has functions pertaining to emotional and cognitive control as well as morality (162–164). Schmahmann (165) posits that the cognitive and limbic functions of the cerebellum lie in the posterior lobe, in line with the findings in this review. Firstly, the posterior cerebellar lobe exhibited reduced activity in a moral judgment task in psychopathic subjects (
Only one of the imaging studies focused on a specific genotype and its relationship to ASPD (134). Twin studies suggest that heredity play a pivotal role in psychopathic traits across childhood (167–170), adolescence (171–175), and adulthood (172, 177, 178). Up to 70% of the variance in psychopathic traits may be attributable to genetics according to recent studies (177–180). However, the involved genes remain to be identified (180). One noteworthy candidate is the human serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) (181, 182). SLC6A4 manifests in two forms, and carriers of the short allele are predisposed to negative mental health aspects including anxiety, depression, substance use disorder, and suicide (181), whereas homozygosity of the long allele is associated with emotional detachment and psychopathic traits (182). Another candidate is the X-linked monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene and its high (MAOA-H) and low activity alleles (MAOA-L) (183). Individuals with absent or low acting MAOA are more prone to aggressive and impulsive behavior and exhibit higher psychopathic traits (184). Furthermore, identifying genes may reveal viable biomarkers for psychopathy. Recently psychopathy was also associated with upregulation of Ribosomal protein L10 Pseudogene 9 (RPL10P9), Zinc finger protein 132 (ZNF132), and downregulation of Cadherin-5 (CDH5) and Opioid receptor Delta 1 (OPRD1) genes, which explained 30% to 92% of the variance in psychopathic symptoms in a stem cell derived study by Tiihonen et al. (185). Identifying more genes and examining their relationship to brain structure and function might provide useful information of the neurobiological etiology of psychopathy. Some of the variance seen in genetic or proteomic studies might also be visualizable with modern or upcoming imaging techniques.
Discovering viable biomarkers for psychopathy is challenging. The results in this review suggest that psychopathy and ASPD might stem from dissimilar biological processes and show divergent neural correlates, yet antisociality and core features of psychopathy are clumped into one disorder. The hypothesis of divergent neural correlates explains not only why some heterogeneity was seen in neuroimaging results of psychopathy, but also why there were many similar anomalies in ASPD and psychopathy (Table 3). For example, Sato and colleagues (
Table 3
| Setting/Characteristic | Core psychopathy | ASPD |
|---|---|---|
| CU traits/Emotional dectachment | Always | Often comorbid |
| Empathy compensation with executive brain regions | Yes | Yes |
| Facial emotion recognition | Amygdalar hyporeactivity | Amygdala hyperreactivity |
| Emotion recognition ability | Diminished | Normal |
| Response to punishment | Increased activity in limbic/paralimbic areas | Decreased activity in limbic/paralimbic areas |
| Decreased GMV in limbic/paralimbic areas | Yes | Yes |
| MAOA -related | No | Yes |
| Hereditary | Highly | Moderately |
| Aggression | Proactive/instrumental | Reactive |
| Notably negative emotionality | No | Yes |
| WMT aberrancies | Decreased FA in the UF | Decreased FA in the UF |
| DMN dysfunction | Yes | Yes |
Key dissimilarities and similarities between core psychopathy and ASPD.
CU, callous-unemotional; FA, fractional anisotropy; GMV, gray matter volume; MAOA, monoamine oxidase A; UF, uncinate fasciculus; WMT, white matter tract.
There has been increasing interest to understand and discover the neural correlates of psychopathy during the past years. Although certain noteworthy patterns and neural correlates have frequently transpired, the neurobiological etiology of psychopathy remains obscure. Furthermore, the findings suggest that “successful” psychopathic individuals may not show similar structural gray matter changes as their “unsuccessful” counterparts. Consequently, if the single thing separating “successful” psychopathy from “unsuccessful” psychopathy is a criminal conviction, then a vast amount of neuroimaging data is yet to be obtained. The majority of the neuroimaging studies are conducted in forensic or prison-related settings, and these unsuccessful psychopathic individuals “represent only the tip of a very large iceberg” [(189) p. 115]. Therefore, focusing on non-clinical and community settings could facilitate the unraveling of the etiology of psychopathy.
This review has several strengths. Firstly, three MRI submodalities were included in this study. Secondly, neuroimaging studies of psychopathic traits in community and clinical settings were included in addition to forensic and prison populations. Thirdly, we included studies with both genders in this review. Fourthly, we strived to include a number of adolescence studies as well, as psychopathic traits manifest as a continuum from childhood to adulthood.
The qualitative synthesis was not without challenges. Firstly, a plethora of different tasks were seen in functional neuroimaging. These tasks needed to be grouped to be able to provide a coherent written summary. Furthermore, some compromise between the readability and high level of details needed to be made, although the Review Matrix contains findings in a more detailed level. Secondly, psychopathy and psychopathic traits have both various definitions and instruments to measure them. Including other instruments apart from the PCL-R can be seen both as a limitation and strength. On the one hand, this can hinder the generalizability of the results. On the other hand, more studies in various settings met the inclusion criteria due to this decision. Further, several of the non-PCL-R instruments are cross-validated with the PCL-R.
Perhaps the most challenging aspect of this review was taking into consideration the high comorbidity of the trait continuums of ASPD, CD, and psychopathy. These heritable disorders reflect independent structural and functional aberrancies in the brain, but also seem to manifest convergent biological processes to some extent. For example, both CD and ASPD are related to dysfunction of the default mode network (
Another limitation of note is that this review focused on MRI submodalities. A review on PET, SPECT, and EEG could shed light on the abstruse neurobiological etiology of psychopathy, and even add support to our findings. The age criterion applied in this review comprises a limitation as it led to the exclusion of several studies. As such, psychopathic traits in childhood and adolescence may require a systematic literature review of their own. Moreover, notwithstanding the inclusion of females in this review, the majority of the studies were conducted on males. This warrants caution in generalizing the results and more research on female psychopathy. Further, it is paramount to mention that “the lack of longitudinal neuroimaging means that persistence of neural abnormalities can only be inferred, not investigated” as aptly put by Linder [(194) p. 68].
Conclusions
This systematic review sums that structural and functional aberrancies involving the limbic and paralimbic systems including reduced integrity of the uncinate fasciculus appear to be associated with core psychopathic features. A deeper investigation into the role of the cerebellum in psychopathy is also warranted and might result in new insights. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that ASPD and psychopathy stem from divergent biological processes. Still, more neuroimaging studies are warranted particularly with respect to female and community psychopathy.
Funding
This study was funded by the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health through a developmental fund for Niuvanniemi Hospital.
Statements
Data availability statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author contributions
MJ, ML, and JT conceived the presented idea. MJ wrote the draft of the manuscript and constructed the tables and figures. ML and JT provided critical feedback and helped shape the manuscript. ML and OV assisted MJ in reviewing the records as specified in the Materials and Methods section. MJ and ML calculated the Cohen's kappa.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Ms. Aija Räsänen for secretarial assistance and PhD Philip Lindner for his comments and insight.
Conflict of interest
ML is a major share holder and board member at Genomi Solutions Ltd., a Finnish bioinformatics company. He has also received grants or honoraria from Sunovion Ltd. and Orion Pharma Ltd. and research scholarships from the Finnish Cultural Foundation and Finnish Medical Foundation. JT has received personal fees from the Finnish Medicines Agency (Fimea), AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly, F Hoffman-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Novartis, Organon, Otsuka, and Pfizer; and has received grants from the Stanley Foundation, Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, Eli Lilly, and Janssen-Cilag.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01027/full#supplementary-material
References
1
BlonigenDMHicksBMKruegerRFPatrickCJIaconoWG. Psychopathic personality traits: heritability and genetic overlap with internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. Psychol Med (2005) 35(5):637–48. doi: 10.1017/S0033291704004180
2
GriffithsSYJalavaJV. A comprehensive neuroimaging review of PCL-R defined psychopathy. Aggress Violent Behav (2017) 36:60–75. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.002
3
KoenigsMBaskin-SommersAZeierJNewmanJP. Investigating the neural correlates of psychopathy: a critical review. Mol Psychiatry (2011) 16(8):792–9. doi: 10.1038/mp.2010.124
4
SantanaEJ. The Brain of the Psychopath: A Systematic Review of Structural Neuroimaging Studies. Psychol Neurosci (2016) 9(4):420–43. doi: 10.1037/pne0000069
5
HareR.The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. 2nd ed.Ontario, Toronto: Multi-Health Systems (2003).
6
HareR.Psychopathy: A Clinical and Forensic Overview. Psychiatr Clinics North America (2006) 29(3):709–24. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2006.04.007
7
HareRNeumannCS. Psychopathy: Assessment and Forensic Implications. Can J Psychiatry (2009) 54(12):791–802. doi: 10.1177/070674370905401202
8
HemphäläMKossonDWestermanJHodginsS. Stability and predictors of psychopathic traits from mid-adolescence through early adulthood. Scand J Psychol (2015) 56(1):649–58. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12257
9
WallerRDishionTShawDGardnerFWilsonMHydeL. Does early childhood callous-unemotional behavior uniquely predict behavior problems or callous-unemotional behavior in late childhood?Dev Psychol (2016) 52(1):1805–19. doi: 10.1037/dev0000165
10
CoidJYangMUllrichSRobertsAHareRD. Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. Int J Law Psychiatry (2009) 32(2):65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.01.002
11
NeumannCHareR. Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. J Consult Clin Psychol (2008) 76(5):893–9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.5.893
12
WernerKBFewLRBucholzKK. Epidemiology, Comorbidity, and Behavioral Genetics of Antisocial Personality Disorder and Psychopathy. Psychiatr Ann (2015) 45(4):195–9. doi: 10.3928/00485713-20150401-08
13
BabiakPNeumannCHareR. Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behav Sci Law (2010) 28(1):174–93. doi: 10.1002/bsl.925
14
KoenigsM. The role of prefrontal cortex in psychopathy. Rev In Neurosci (2012) 23(3):253–62. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0036
15
OgloffJ. Psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder conundrum. Aust New Z J Psychiatry (2006) 40(1):519–28. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01834.x
16
LindnerPBudhirajaMWestermanJSavicIJokinenJTiihonenJet al. White matter correlates of psychopathic traits in a female community sample. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2017) 12(9):1500–10. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx070
17
YangYRaineACollettiPTogaAWNarrKL. Morphological alterations in the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala in unsuccessful psychopaths. J Abnormal Psychol (2010) 119(3):546–54. doi: 10.1037/a0019611
18
PoepplTBDongesMRMokrosARupprechtRFoxPTLairdARet al. A view behind the mask of sanity: meta-analysis of aberrant brain activity in psychopaths. Mol Psychiatry (2019) 24(3):463–70. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0122-5
19
PujolJHarrisonBJContreras-RodriguezOCardonerN. The contribution of brain imaging to the understanding of psychopathy. Psychol Med (2019) 49(1):20–31. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002507
20
PridmoreSChambersAMcArthurM. Neuroimaging in psychopathy. Aust New Z J Psychiatry (2005) 39(10):856–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01679.x
21
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J Clin Epidemiol (2009) 62(10):1006–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
22
Baskin-SommersARNeumannCSCopeLMKiehlKA. Latent-variable modeling of brain gray-matter volume and psychopathy in incarcerated offenders. J Abnormal Psychol (2016) 125(6):811–7. doi: 10.1037/abn0000175
23
BertschKGrotheMPrehnKVohsKBergerCHauensteinK. Brain volumes differ between diagnostic groups of violent criminal offenders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2013) 263(7):593–606. doi: 10.1007/s00406-013-0391-6
24
BoccardiMGanzolaRRossiRSabattoliFLaaksoMPRepo-TiihonenEet al. Abnormal hippocampal shape in offenders with psychopathy. Hum Brain Mapp (2010) 31(3):438–47. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20877
25
BoccardiMFrisoniGBHareRDCavedoENajtPPievaniMet al. Cortex and amygdala morphology in psychopathy. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2011) 193(2):85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.12.013
26
BoccardiMBocchettaMAronenHJRepo-TiihonenEVaurioOThompsonPMet al. Atypical nucleus accumbens morphology in psychopathy: Another limbic piece in the puzzle. Int J Law Psychiatry (2013) 36(2):157–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.008
27
Contreras-RodríguezOPujolJBatallaIHarrisonBJSoriano-MasCDeusJet al. Functional Connectivity Bias in the Prefrontal Cortex of Psychopaths. Biol Psychiatry (2015) 78(9):647–55. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.007
28
CopeLMShaneMSSegallJMNyalakantiPKStevensMCPearlsonGDet al. Examining the effect of psychopathic traits on gray matter volume in a community substance abuse sample. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2012) 204(2–3):91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.10.004
29
de Oliveira-SouzaRHareRDBramatiIEGarridoGJAzevedo IgnácioFTovar-MollFet al. Psychopathy as a disorder of the moral brain: Fronto-temporo-limbic grey matter reductions demonstrated by voxel-based morphometry. NeuroImage (2008) 40(3):1202–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.054
30
ErmerECopeLMNyalakantiPKCalhounVDKiehlKA. Aberrant paralimbic gray matter in criminal psychopathy. J Abnormal Psychol (2012) 121(3):649–58. doi: 10.1037/a0026371
31
FairchildGPassamontiLHurfordGHaganCCVon Dem HagenEAHVan GoozenSHMet al. Brain structure abnormalities in early-onset and adolescent-onset conduct disorder. Am J Psychiatry (2011) 168(6):624–33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10081184
32
GlennALRaineAYaralianPSYangY. Increased Volume of the Striatum in Psychopathic Individuals. Biol Psychiatry (2010) 67(1):52–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.018
33
GregorySFfytcheDSimmonsAKumariVHowardMHodginsSet al. The Antisocial Brain: Psychopathy Matters. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2012) 69(9):962. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.222
34
HownerKEskildsenSFFischerHDierksTWahlundL-OJonssonTet al. Thinner cortex in the frontal lobes in mentally disordered offenders. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2012) 203(2–3):126–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.12.011
35
KorponayCPujaraMDemingPPhilippiCDecetyJKossonDSet al. Impulsive-Antisocial Dimension of Psychopathy Linked to Enlargement and Abnormal Functional Connectivity of the Striatum. Biol Psychiatry: Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging (2017a) 2(2):149–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.07.004
36
KorponayCPujaraMDemingPPhilippiCDecetyJKossonDSet al. Impulsive-antisocial psychopathic traits linked to increased volume and functional connectivity within prefrontal cortex. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2017b) 12(7):1169–78. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx042
37
LaaksoMPGunning-DixonFVaurioORepo-TiihonenESoininenHTiihonenJ. Prefrontal volumes in habitually violent subjects with antisocial personality disorder and type 2 alcoholism. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2002) 114(2):95–102. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(02)00005-7
38
LeutgebVLeitnerMWabneggerAKlugDScharmüllerWZussnerTet al. Brain abnormalities in high-risk violent offenders and their association with psychopathic traits and criminal recidivism. Neuroscience (2015) 308:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.011
39
LyMMotzkinJCPhilippiCLKirkGRNewmanJPKiehlKAet al. Cortical Thinning in Psychopathy. Am J Psychiatry (2012) 169(7):743–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111627
40
MiskovichTAAndersonNEHarenskiCLHarenskiKABaskin-SommersARLarsonCLet al. Abnormal cortical gyrification in criminal psychopathy. NeuroImage: Clin (2018) 19:876–82. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.007
41
MüllerJLGänßbauerSSommerMDöhnelKWeberTSchmidt-WilckeTet al. Gray matter changes in right superior temporal gyrus in criminal psychopaths. Evid Voxel-Based Morphometry Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2008) 163(3):213–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.08.010
42
PardiniDARaineAEricksonKLoeberR. Lower Amygdala Volume in Men is Associated with Childhood Aggression, Early Psychopathic Traits, and Future Violence. Biol Psychiatry (2014) 75(1):73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.04.003
43
RaineLTTaylorKHelligeJBBihrleSLacasseLCollettiP. Corpus callosum abnormalities in psychopathic antisocial individuals. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2003) 60(11):1134–42. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1134
44
RaineAIshikawaSSArceELenczTKnuthKHBihrleSet al. Hippocampal structural asymmetry in unsuccessful psychopaths. Biol Psychiatry (2004) 55(2):185–91. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00727-3
45
SatoJRde Oliveira-SouzaRThomazCEBasílioRBramatiIEAmaroEet al. Identification of psychopathic individuals using pattern classification of MRI images. Soc Neurosci (2011) 6(5–6):627–39. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.562687
46
TiihonenJRossiRLaaksoMPHodginsSTestaCPerezJet al. Brain anatomy of persistent violent offenders: More rather than less. Psychiatry Res - Neuroimaging (2008) 163(3):201–12. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.08.012
47
VieiraJBFerreira-SantosFAlmeidaPRBarbosaFMarques-TeixeiraJMarshAA. Psychopathic traits are associated with cortical and subcortical volume alterations in healthy individuals. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2015) 10(12):1693–704. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv062
48
YangYRaineANarrKLCollettiPTogaAW. Localization of Deformations Within the Amygdala in Individuals With Psychopathy. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2009) 66(9):986. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.110
49
AndersonNESteeleVRMaurerJMRaoVKoenigsMRDecetyJet al. Differentiating emotional processing and attention in psychopathy with functional neuroimaging. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2017) 17(3):491–515. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0493-5
50
BjorkJMChenGHommerDW. Psychopathic tendencies and mesolimbic recruitment by cues for instrumental and passively obtained rewards. Biol Psychol (2012) 89(2):408–15. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.003
51
Contreras-RodríguezOPujolJBatallaIHarrisonBJBosqueJIbern-RegàsIet al. Disrupted neural processing of emotional faces in psychopathy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2014) 9(4):505–12. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst014
52
CopeLMVincentGMJobeliusJLNyalakantiPKCalhounVDKiehlKA. Psychopathic traits modulate brain responses to drug cues in incarcerated offenders. Front In Hum Neurosci (2014) 8:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00087
53
DecetyJChenCHarenskiCKiehlKA. An fMRI study of affective perspective taking in individuals with psychopathy: imagining another in pain does not evoke empathy. Front In Hum Neurosci (2013) 7:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00489
54
DecetyJSkellyLRKiehlKA. Brain Response to Empathy-Eliciting Scenarios Involving Pain in Incarcerated Individuals With Psychopathy. JAMA Psychiatry (2013) 70(6):638. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.27
55
DecetyJSkellyLYoderKJKiehlKA. Neural processing of dynamic emotional facial expressions in psychopaths. Soc Neurosci (2014) 9(1):36–49. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.866905
56
DeeleyQDalyESurguladzeSTunstallNMezeyGBeerDet al. Facial emotion processing in criminal psychopathy. Br J Psychiatry (2006) 189(06):533–9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.021410
57
DemingPPhilippiCLWolfRCDargisMKiehlKAKoenigsM. Psychopathic traits linked to alterations in neural activity during personality judgments of self and others. NeuroImage: Clin (2018) 18:575–81. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.029
58
EwbankMPPassamontiLHaganCCGoodyerIMCalderAJFairchildG. Psychopathic traits influence amygdala–anterior cingulate cortex connectivity during facial emotion processing. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2018) 13(5):525–34. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy019
59
FedeSJBorgJSNyalakantiPKHarenskiCLCopeLMSinnott-ArmstrongWet al. Distinct neuronal patterns of positive and negative moral processing in psychopathy. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2016) 16(6):1074–85. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0454-z
60
GeurtsDEMvon BorriesKVolmanIBultenBHCoolsRVerkesR-J. Neural connectivity during reward expectation dissociates psychopathic criminals from non-criminal individuals with high impulsive/antisocial psychopathic traits. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2016) 11(8):1326–34. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw040
61
GlennALHanHYangYRaineASchugRA. Associations between psychopathic traits and brain activity during instructed false responding. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2017) 266:123–37. ((Glenn A.L., alglenn1@ua.edu) Center for the Prevention of Youth Behavior Problems, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States). doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.06.008
62
GregorySBlairRJFfytcheDSimmonsAKumariVHodginsSet al. Punishment and psychopathy: a case-control functional MRI investigation of reinforcement learning in violent antisocial personality disordered men. Lancet Psychiatry (2015) 2(2):153–60. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00071-6
63
HarenskiKShaneMKiehlK. Aberrant neural processing of moral violations in criminal psychopaths. J Abnormal Psychol (2010) 119(4):863–74. doi: 10.1037/a0020979
64
HarenskiCEdwardsBHarenskiKKiehlK. Neural correlates of moral and non-moral emotion in female psychopathy. Front In Hum Neurosci (2014) 8:741. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00741
65
HoskingJGKastmanEKDorfmanHMSamanez-LarkinGRBaskin-SommersAKiehlKAet al. Disrupted Prefrontal Regulation of Striatal Subjective Value Signals in Psychopathy. Neuron (2017) 95(1):221–231.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.030
66
HydeLWByrdALVotruba-DrzalEHaririARManuckSB. Amygdala reactivity and negative emotionality: Divergent correlates of antisocial personality and psychopathy traits in a community sample. J Abnormal Psychol (2014) 123(1):214–24. doi: 10.1037/a0035467
67
JuárezMKiehlKACalhounVD. Intrinsic limbic and paralimbic networks are associated with criminal psychopathy. Hum Brain Mapp (2013) 34(8):1921–30. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22037
68
KiehlKASmithAMHareRDMendrekAForsterBBBrinkJet al. Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry (2001) 50(9):677–684. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01222-7
69
LarsonCLBaskin-SommersARStoutDMBalderstonNLCurtinJJSchultzDHet al. The interplay of attention and emotion: top-down attention modulates amygdala activation in psychopathy. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2013) 13(4):757–70. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0172-8
70
LindnerPFlodinPBudhirajaMSavicIJokinenJTiihonenJet al. Associations of Psychopathic Traits With Local and Global Brain Network Topology in Young Adult Women. Biol Psychiatry: Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging (2018) 3(12):1003–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.04.010
71
MarshAACardinaleEM. When psychopathy impairs moral judgments: neural responses during judgments about causing fear. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2014) 9(1):3–11. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss097
72
MierDHaddadLDiersKDressingHMeyer-LindenbergAKirschP. Reduced embodied simulation in psychopathy. World J Biol Psychiatry (2014) 15(6):479–87. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2014.902541
73
MotzkinJCNewmanJPKiehlKAKoenigsM. Reduced Prefrontal Connectivity in Psychopathy. J Neurosci (2011) 31(48):17348–57. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4215-11.2011
74
MüllerJLSommerMWagnerVLangeKTaschlerHRöderCHet al. Abnormalities in emotion processing within cortical and subcortical regions in criminal psychopaths. Biol Psychiatry (2003) 54(2):152–62. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01749-3
75
OsumiTNakaoTKasuyaYShinodaJYamadaJOhiraH. Amygdala dysfunction attenuates frustration-induced aggression in psychopathic individuals in a non-criminal population. J Affect Disord (2012) 142(1–3):331–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.012
76
Pera-GuardiolaVContreras-RodríguezOBatallaIKossonDMenchónJMPifarréJet al. Brain structural correlates of emotion recognition in psychopaths. PloS One (2016) 11(5):e0149807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149807
77
PhilippiCLPujaraMSMotzkinJCNewmanJKiehlKAKoenigsM. Altered Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Cortical Networks in Psychopathy. J Neurosci (2015) 35(15):6068–78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5010-14.2015
78
PujaraMMotzkinJCNewmanJPKiehlKAKoenigsM. Neural correlates of reward and loss sensitivity in psychopathy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2014) 9(6):794–801. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst054
79
RillingJKGlennALJairamMRPagnoniGGoldsmithDRElfenbeinHAet al. Neural Correlates of Social Cooperation and Non-Cooperation as a Function of Psychopathy. Biol Psychiatry (2007) 61(11):1260–71. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.021
80
ShaoRLeeTMC. Are individuals with higher psychopathic traits better learners at lying? Behavioural and neural evidence. Trans Psychiatry (2017) 7(7):e1175. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.147
81
SommerMSodianBDöhnelKSchwerdtnerJMeinhardtJHajakG. In psychopathic patients emotion attribution modulates activity in outcome-related brain areas. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2010) 182(2):88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.01.007
82
VieiraJBAlmeidaPRFerreira-SantosFBarbosaFMarques-TeixeiraJMarshAA. Distinct neural activation patterns underlie economic decisions in high and low psychopathy scorers. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2014) 9(8):1099–107. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst093
83
YoderKPorgesEDecetyJ. Amygdala subnuclei connectivity in response to violence reveals unique influences of individual differences in psychopathic traits in a nonforensic sample. Hum Brain Mapp (2015) 36(4):1417–28. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22712
84
ZijlmansJMarheRBevaartFLuijksM-JAvan DuinLTiemeierHet al. Neural Correlates of Moral Evaluation and Psychopathic Traits in Male Multi-Problem Young Adults. Front In Psychiatry (2018) 9:248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00248
85
HoppenbrouwersSSNazeriAde JesusDRStirpeTFelskyDSchutterDJLGet al. White Matter Deficits in Psychopathic Offenders and Correlation with Factor Structure. PloS One (2013) 8(8):e72375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072375
86
SethiAGregorySDell'AcquaFPeriche ThomasESimmonsAMurphyDGMet al. Emotional detachment in psychopathy: Involvement of dorsal default-mode connections. Cortex (2015) 62:11–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.07.018
87
SobhaniMBakerLMartinsBTuvbladCAziz-ZadehL. Psychopathic traits modulate microstructural integrity of right uncinate fasciculus in a community population. NeuroImage: Clin (2015) 8:32–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.012
88
SundramFDeeleyQSarkarSDalyELathamRCraigMet al. White matter microstructural abnormalities in the frontal lobe of adults with antisocial personality disorder. Cortex (2012) 48(2):216–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.06.005
89
WolfRCPujaraMSMotzkinJCNewmanJPKiehlKADecetyJet al. Interpersonal traits of psychopathy linked to reduced integrity of the uncinate fasciculus. Hum Brain Mapp (2015) 36(10):4202–9. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22911
90
CohnMDVidingEMcCroryEPapeLvan den BrinkWDoreleijersTAHet al. Regional grey matter volume and concentration in at-risk adolescents: Untangling associations with callous-unemotional traits and conduct disorder symptoms. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2016) 254:180–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.07.003
91
LamBHYYangYSchugRAHanCLiuJLeeTMC. Psychopathy moderates the relationship between orbitofrontal and striatal alterations and violence: the investigation of Individuals accused of homicide. Front Hum Neurosci (2017) 579(11):1–11. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00579
92
AndersonNEMaurerJMSteeleVRKiehlKA. Psychopathic traits associated with abnormal hemodynamic activity in salience and default mode networks during auditory oddball task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2018) 18(3):564–80. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0588-2
93
CohnMDPapeLESchmaalLvan den BrinkWvan WingenGVermeirenRRJMet al. Differential relations between juvenile psychopathic traits and resting state network connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp (2015) 36(6):2396–405. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22779
94
FreemanSMClewettDVBennettCMKiehlKAGazzanigaMSMillerMB. The posteromedial region of the default mode network shows attenuated task-induced deactivation in psychopathic prisoners. Neuropsychology (2015) 29(3):493–500. doi: 10.1037/neu0000118
95
FullamRSMcKieSDolanMC. Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Psychiatry (2009) 194(03):229–35. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053199
96
MurrayLShawDSForbesEEHydeLW. Reward-Related Neural Correlates of Antisocial Behavior and Callous–Unemotional Traits in Young Men. Biol Psychiatry: Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging (2017) 2(4):346–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.01.009
97
SchifferBPawliczekCMüllerBForstingMGizewskiELeygrafNet al. Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive control of men with lifelong antisocial behavior. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2014) 222(1–2):43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.01.008
98
Seara-CardosoAVidingELickleyRASebastianCL. Neural responses to others' pain vary with psychopathic traits in healthy adult males. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2015) 15(3):578–88. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0346-7
99
Seara-CardosoASebastianCLMcCroryEFoulkesLBuonMRoiserJPet al. Anticipation of guilt for everyday moral transgressions: The role of the anterior insula and the influence of interpersonal psychopathic traits. Sci Rep (2016) 6:1–10. doi: 10.1038/srep36273
100
VieiraJBTavaresTPMarshAAMitchellDGV. Emotion and personal space: neural correlates of approach-avoidance tendencies to different facial expressions as a function of coldhearted psychopathic traits. Hum Brain Mapp (2017) 38(3):1492–506. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23467
101
YoderKHarenskiCKiehlKDecetyJ. Neural networks underlying implicit and explicit moral evaluations in psychopathy. Trans Psychiatry (2015) 5(8):e625–5. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.117
102
PapeLECohnMDCaanMWAvan WingenGvan den BrinkWVeltmanDJet al. Psychopathic traits in adolescents are associated with higher structural connectivity. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2015) 233(3):474–80. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.07.023
103
RaichleME. The Brain's Default Mode Network. Annu Rev Neurosci (2015) 38(1):433–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030
104
KjaerTWNowakMLouHC. Reflective Self-Awareness and Conscious States: PET Evidence for a Common Midline Parietofrontal Core. NeuroImage (2002) 17(2):1080–6. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1230
105
GusnardDAAkbudakEShulmanGLRaichleME. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2001) 98(7):4259–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071043098
106
GreeneJHaidtJ. How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends In Cogn Sci (2002) 6(12):517–23. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9
107
HarrisonBJPujolJLopez-SolaMHernandez-RibasRDeusJOrtizHet al. Consistency and functional specialization in the default mode brain network. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2008) 105(28):9781–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711791105
108
XiaMWangJHeY. BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics. PloS One (2013) 8(7):e68910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068910
109
Tzourio-MazoyerNLandeauBPapathanassiouDCrivelloFEtardODelcroixNet al. Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain. NeuroImage (2002) 15(1):273–89. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
110
KollaNJGregorySAttardSBlackwoodNHodginsS. Disentangling possible effects of childhood physical abuse on gray matter changes in violent offenders with psychopathy. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2014) 221(2):123–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.11.008
111
RollsET. Limbic systems for emotion and for memory, but no single limbic system. Cortex (2015) 62:119–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.005
112
GlennALYangYRaineACollettiP. No volumetric differences in the anterior cingulate of psychopathic individuals. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2010) 183(2):140–3. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.05.009
113
BeckwithTJDietrichKNWrightJPAltayeMCecilKM. Reduced regional volumes associated with total psychopathy scores in an adult population with childhood lead exposure. NeuroToxicology (2018) 67:1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2018.04.004
114
PujolJBatallaIContreras-RodríguezOHarrisonBJPeraVHernández-RibasRet al. Breakdown in the brain network subserving moral judgment in criminal psychopathy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2012) 7(8):917–23. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr075
115
ShengTGheytanchiAAziz-ZadehL. Default network deactivations are correlated with psychopathic personality traits. PloS One (2010) 5(9):1–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012611
116
VolmanIKatinka Louise von BorriesAHendrik BultenBJan VerkesRToniIRoelofsK. (2016). Testosterone Modulates Altered Prefrontal Control of Emotional Actions in Psychopathic Offenders. ENeuro3(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0107-15.2016
117
DecetyJChenCHarenskiCLKiehlKA. Socioemotional processing of morally-laden behavior and their consequences on others in forensic psychopaths. Hum Brain Mapp (2015) 36(6):2015–26. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22752
118
HanTAldersGLGreeningSGNeufeldRWJMitchellDGV. Do fearful eyes activate empathy-related brain regions in individuals with callous traits?Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2012) 7(8):958–68. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr068
119
SadehNSpielbergJMHellerWHerringtonJDEngelsASWarrenSLet al. Emotion disrupts neural activity during selective attention in psychopathy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2013) 8(3):235–46. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr092
120
ReniersRLEPCorcoranRVöllmBAMashruAHowardRLiddlePF. Moral decision-making, ToM, empathy and the default mode network. Biol Psychol (2012) 90(3):202–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.009
121
MolenberghsPBosworthRNottZLouisWRSmithJRAmiotCEet al. The influence of group membership and individual differences in psychopathy and perspective taking on neural responses when punishing and rewarding others. Hum Brain Mapp (2014) 35(10):4989–99. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22527
122
SitaramRCariaAVeitRGaberTRuizSBirbaumerN. Volitional control of the anterior insula in criminal psychopaths using real-time fMRI neurofeedback: a pilot study. Front In Behav Neurosci (2014) 8:344. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00344
123
BuckholtzJWTreadwayMTCowanRLWoodwardNDBenningSDLiRet al. Mesolimbic dopamine reward system hypersensitivity in individuals with psychopathic traits. Nat Neurosci (2010) 13(4):419–21. doi: 10.1038/nn.2510
124
LindnerPSavicIRitnikovRBudhirajaMLiuYJokinenJet al. Conduct disorder in females is associated with reduced corpus callosum structural integrity independent of comorbid disorders and exposure to maltreatment. Trans Psychiatry (2016) 6(1):e714–4. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.216
125
JiangWLiGLiuHShiFWangTShenCet al. Reduced cortical thickness and increased surface area in antisocial personality disorder. Neuroscience (2016) 337:143–52. ((Jiang W.; Liu H.; Wang W., cjr.wangwei@vip.163.com) Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China). doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.052
126
KumariVUddinSPremkumarPYoungSGudjonssonGHRaghuvanshiSet al. Lower anterior cingulate volume in seriously violent men with antisocial personality disorder or schizophrenia and a history of childhood abuse. Aust New Z J Psychiatry (2014) 48(2):153–61. doi: 10.1177/0004867413512690
127
NarayanVMNarrKLKumariVWoodsRPThompsonPMTogaAWet al. Regional Cortical Thinning in Subjects With Violent Antisocial Personality Disorder or Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry (2007) 164(9):1418–27. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101631
128
RaineAYangYNarrK.Sex differences in orbitofrontal gray as a partial explanation for sex differences in antisocial personality. Mol Psychiatry (2011) 16:227–236. doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.136
129
KumariVGudjonssonGRahguvanshiSBarkatakiITaylorPSumichAet al. Reduced thalamic volume in men with antisocial personality disorder or schizophrenia and a history of serious violence and childhood abuse. Eur Psychiatry (2013) 28(4):225–34. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2012.03.002
130
TangYLiuWChenJLiaoJHuDWangW. Altered spontaneous activity in antisocial personality disorder revealed by regional homogeneity. NeuroReport (2013) 24(11):590–5. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283627993
131
TangYJiangWLiaoJWangWLuoA. Identifying Individuals with Antisocial Personality Disorder Using Resting-State fMRI. PloS One (2013) 8(4):e60652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060652
132
LiuHLiaoJJiangWWangW. Changes in low-frequency fluctuations in patients with antisocial personality disorder revealed by resting-state functional MRI. PloS One (2014) 9(3):1–6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089790
133
KollaNJDunlopKDownarJLinksPMichael BagbyRWilsonAAet al. Association of ventral striatum monoamine oxidase-A binding and functional connectivity in antisocial personality disorder with high impulsivity: A positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol (2016) 26(4):777–86. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.030
134
KollaNJDunlopKMeyerJHDownarJ. Corticostriatal Connectivity in Antisocial Personality Disorder by MAO-A Genotype and Its Relationship to Aggressive Behavior. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol (2018) 21(8):725–33. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy035
135
KumariVAasenITaylorPFfytcheDHDasMBarkatakiIet al. Neural dysfunction and violence in schizophrenia: An fMRI investigation. Schizophr Res (2006) 84(1):144–64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.02.017
136
BarkatakiIKumariVDasMSumichATaylorPSharmaT. Neural correlates of deficient response inhibition in mentally disordered violent individuals. Behav Sci Law (2008) 26(1):51–64. doi: 10.1002/bsl.787
137
BobesMAOstroskyFDiazKRomeroCBorjaKSantosYet al. Linkage of functional and structural anomalies in the left amygdala of reactive-aggressive men. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2013) 8(8):928–36. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss101
138
SchifferBPawliczekCMüllerBWWiltfangJBrüneMForstingMet al. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Affective Theory of Mind in Violent Antisocial Personality Disorder and/or Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull (2017) 43(6):1229–39. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx012
139
JiangWShiFLiuHLiGDingZShenHet al. Reduced White Matter Integrity in Antisocial Personality Disorder: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study. Sci Rep (2017) 7:43002. doi: 10.1038/srep43002
140
BudhirajaMSavicILindnerPJokinenJTiihonenJHodginsS. Brain structure abnormalities in young women who presented conduct disorder in childhood/adolescence. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2017) 17(4):869–85. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0519-7
141
HolzNEBoecker-SchlierRBuchmannAFBlomeyerDJennen-SteinmetzCBaumeisterSet al. Ventral striatum and amygdala activity as convergence sites for early adversity and conduct disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2017) 12(2):261–72. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw120
142
PassamontiLFairchildGFornitoAGoodyerIMNimmo-SmithIHaganCCet al. Abnormal Anatomical Connectivity between the Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex in Conduct Disorder. PloS One (2012) 7(11):e48789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048789
143
GieselFLThomannPAHahnHKPolitiMStieltjesBWeberM-Aet al. Comparison of manual direct and automated indirect measurement of hippocampus using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol (2008) 66(2):268–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.009
144
MacdonaldKEBartlettJWLeungKKOurselinSBarnesJ. The Value of Hippocampal and Temporal Horn Volumes and Rates of Change in Predicting Future Conversion to AD. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord (2013) 27(2):168–73. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318260a79a
145
ChanceSAEsiriMMCrowTJ. Ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia: a primary change in the temporal lobe?Schizophr Res (2003) 62(1–2):123–31. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00344-4
146
GreiciusMDKrasnowBReissALMenonV. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2003) 100(1):253–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135058100
147
OstbyYWalhovdKBTamnesCKGrydelandHWestlyeLTFjellAM. Mental time travel and default-mode network functional connectivity in the developing brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2012) 109(42):16800–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210627109
148
JiangWShiFLiaoJLiuHWangTShenCet al. Disrupted functional connectome in antisocial personality disorder. Brain Imaging Behav (2017) 11(4):1071–84. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9572-z
149
BlairRJ. The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: functional contributions and dysfunction in psychopathy. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci (2008) 363(1503):2557–65. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0027
150
BlairRJR. The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends In Cogn Sci (2007) 11(9):387–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003
151
TrompDPMGrupeDWOathesDJMcFarlinDRHernandezPJKralTRAet al. Reduced Structural Connectivity of a Major Frontolimbic Pathway in Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2012) 69(9):925. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2178
152
de KwaastenietBRuheECaanMRiveMOlabarriagaSGroefsemaMet al. Relation Between Structural and Functional Connectivity in Major Depressive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry (2013) 74(1):40–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.12.024
153
CataniMThiebault de SchottenM. Atlas of human brain connections. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2012). doi: 10.1093/med/9780199541164.001.0001
154
SanjuanPMThomaRClausEDMaysNCaprihanA. Reduced white matter integrity in the cingulum and anterior corona radiata in posttraumatic stress disorder in male combat veterans: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging (2013) 214(3):260–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.09.002
155
TakeiKYamasueHAbeOYamadaHInoueHSugaMet al. Structural disruption of the dorsal cingulum bundle is associated with impaired Stroop performance in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res (2009) 114(1–3):119–27. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.05.012
156
HamiltonRKBHiatt RacerKNewmanJP. Impaired integration in psychopathy: A unified theory of psychopathic dysfunction. psychol Rev (2015) 122(4):770–91. doi: 10.1037/a0039703
157
RizzolattiGSinigagliaC. The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci (2016) 17(12):757–65. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.135
158
de LangeFPSpronkMWillemsRMToniIBekkeringH. Complementary Systems for Understanding Action Intentions. Curr Biol (2008) 18(6):454–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.057
159
BairdADSchefferIEWilsonSJ. Mirror neuron system involvement in empathy: A critical look at the evidence. Soc Neurosci (2011) 6(4):327–35. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2010.547085
160
DiamondLMDickensonJA. The neuroimaging of love and desire: review and future directions. Clin Neuropsychiatry (2012) 9(1):39–46.
161
LeedomLJGeislinEHartoonian AlmasL. “Did he ever love me?” A qualitative study of life with a psychopathic husband. Family Intimate Partner Violence Q (2012) 5(2):103–35.
162
BalstersJHWhelanCDRobertsonIHRamnaniN. Cerebellum and Cognition: Evidence for the Encoding of Higher Order Rules. Cereb Cortex (2013) 23(6):1433–43. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs127
163
Demirtas-TatlidedeASchmahmannJD. Morality: incomplete without the cerebellum?Brain (2013) 136(8):e244–4. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt070
164
SchutterDJLGvan HonkJ. The Cerebellum in Emotion Regulation: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Cerebellum (2009) 8(1):28–34. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0056-6
165
SchmahmannJD. The Role of the Cerebellum in Cognition and Emotion : Personal Reflections Since 1982 on the Dysmetria of Thought Hypothesis, and … The Role of the Cerebellum in Cognition and Emotion : Personal Reflections Since 1982 on the Dysmetria of Thought Hypoth. Neuropsychol Rev (2014) 20(3):236–60. doi: 10.1007/s11065-010-9142-x
166
StoodleyCJSchmahmannJD. Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex (2010) 46(7):831–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.008
167
BezdjianSRaineABakerLALynamDR. Psychopathic personality in children: genetic and environmental contributions. psychol Med (2011) 41(03):589–600. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000966
168
BezdjianSTuvbladCRaineABakerL. The Genetic and Environmental Covariation Among Psychopathic Personality Traits, and Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Childhood. Child Dev (2011) 82(4):1267–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01598.x
169
FontaineNMGRijsdijkFVMcCroryEJPVidingE. Etiology of Different Developmental Trajectories of Callous-Unemotional Traits. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2010) 49(7):656–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.03.014
170
VidingEBlairRJRMoffittTEPlominR. Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds. J Child Psychol Psychiatry (2005) 46(6):592–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00393.x
171
BlonigenDMHicksBMKruegerRFPatrickCJIaconoWG. Continuity and change in psychopathic traits as measured via normal-range personality: A longitudinal-biometric study. J Abnormal Psychol (2006) 115(1):85–95. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.85
172
ForsmanMLichtensteinPAndershedHLarssonH. Genetic effects explain the stability of psychopathic personality from mid- to late adolescence. J Abnormal Psychol (2008) 117(3):606–17. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.3.606
173
LarssonHAndershedHLichtensteinP. A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic personality. J Abnormal Psychol (2006) 115(2):221–30. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.221
174
LarssonHTuvbladCRijsdijkFVAndershedHGrannMLichtensteinP. A common genetic factor explains the association between psychopathic personality and antisocial behavior. psychol Med (2007) 37(01):15. doi: 10.1017/S003329170600907X
175
TaylorJLoneyBRBobadillaLIaconoWGMcGueM. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Psychopathy Trait Dimensions in a Community Sample of Male Twins. J Abnormal Child Psychol (2003) 31(6):633–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1026262207449
176
BrookMPanizzonMSKossonDSSullivanEALyonsMJFranzCEet al. Psychopathic Personality Traits in Middle-Aged Male Twins: A Behavior Genetic Investigation. J Pers Disord (2010) 24(4):473–86. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.473
177
TuvbladCWangPBezdjianSRaineABakerLA. Psychopathic personality development from ages 9 to 18: Genes and environment. Dev Psychopathol (2016) 28(01):27–44. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000267
178
TuvbladCBezdjianSRaineABakerLA. The heritability of psychopathic personality in 14- to 15-year-old twins: A multirater, multimeasure approach. psychol Assess (2014) 26(3):704–16. doi: 10.1037/a0036711
179
VidingEMcCroryEJ. Genetic and neurocognitive contributions to the development of psychopathy. Dev Psychopathol (2012) 24(03):969–83. doi: 10.1017/S095457941200048X
180
VidingEPriceTSJaffeeSRTrzaskowskiMDavisOSPMeaburnELet al. Genetics of Callous-Unemotional Behavior in Children. PloS One (2013) 8(7):e65789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065789
181
CaspiAHaririARHolmesAUherRMoffittTE. Genetic Sensitivity to the Environment: The Case of the Serotonin Transporter Gene and Its Implications for Studying Complex Diseases and Traits. Am J Psychiatry (2010) 167(5):509–27. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101452
182
GlennAL. The other allele: Exploring the long allele of the serotonin transporter gene as a potential risk factor for psychopathy: A review of the parallels in findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2011) 35(3):612–20. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.005
183
KollaNJVinetteSA. Monoamine Oxidase A in Antisocial Personality Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep (2017) 4(1):41–8. doi: 10.1007/s40473-017-0102-0
184
KollaNJMatthewsBWilsonAAHouleSMichael BagbyRLinksPet al. Lower Monoamine Oxidase-A Total Distribution Volume in Impulsive and Violent Male Offenders with Antisocial Personality Disorder and High Psychopathic Traits: An [11C] Harmine Positron Emission Tomography Study. Neuropsychopharmacology (2015) 40(11):2596–603. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.106
185
TiihonenJKoskuviMLähteenvuoMVirtanenPLJOjansuuIVaurioOet al. Neurobiological roots of psychopathy. Mol Psychiatry (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0488-z
186
CoidJUllrichS. Antisocial personality disorder is on a continuum with psychopathy. Compr Psychiatry (2010) 51(4):426–33. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.006
187
Del CasaleAKotzalidisGDRapinesiCDi PietroSAlessiMCDi CesareGet al. Functional Neuroimaging in Psychopathy. Neuropsychobiology (2015) 72(2):97–117. doi: 10.1159/000441189
188
CowanL. The Psychopath: What's Love Got to Do with It?psychol Perspect (2014) 57(3):291–311. doi: 10.1080/00332925.2014.936241
189
HareR. Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. New York, NY: Guilford Press (1993).
190
BavaSJacobusJThayerRETapertSF. Longitudinal Changes in White Matter Integrity Among Adolescent Substance Users. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res (2013) 37:E181–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01920.x
191
KonradAVucurevicGLorscheiderMBernowNThümmelMChaiCet al. Broad Disruption of Brain White Matter Microstructure and Relationship with Neuropsychological Performance in Male Patients with Severe Alcohol Dependence. Alcohol Alcohol (2012) 47(2):118–26. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr157
192
FeinGSclafaniVCardenasVAGoldmannHTolou-ShamsMMeyerhoffDJ. Cortical Gray Matter Loss in Treatment-Naive Alcohol Dependent Individuals. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res (2002) 26(4):558–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2002.tb02574.x
193
MonADurazzoTCAbeCGazdzinskiSPenningtonDSchmidtTet al. Structural brain differences in alcohol-dependent individuals with and without comorbid substance dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend (2014) 144:170–7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.010
194
LindnerP. Structural and functional brain connectivity abnormalities associated with adolescent conduct disorder in females. (Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet) (2017).
Summary
Keywords
psychopathy, neuroimaging, review, antisocial, callous-unemotional, emotional detachment
Citation
Johanson M, Vaurio O, Tiihonen J and Lähteenvuo M (2020) A Systematic Literature Review of Neuroimaging of Psychopathic Traits. Front. Psychiatry 10:1027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01027
Received
12 September 2019
Accepted
30 December 2019
Published
06 February 2020
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Pietro Pietrini, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Italy
Reviewed by
Stefano Ferracuti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Bernhard Bogerts, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Johanson, Vaurio, Tiihonen and Lähteenvuo.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mika Johanson, mika.johanson@stud.ki.se
This article was submitted to Forensic Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.