Abstract
Background: Adolescence has been described as a period of increased health risk-taking behaviors. Given the variety of cultural contexts, healthcare systems, and public health policies in different regions, the present study aimed to determine whether there are similar or different associations of substance use behaviors with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among US and Chinese adolescents.
Methods: This study included a total of 14,765 US adolescents from the 2017 National Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) and 24,345 Chinese adolescents from the 2017 School-based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey (SCAHS).
Results: The proportions of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were 17.4 and 5.7% among US adolescents, which were higher than those among Chinese adolescents (suicidal ideation: 13.7% and suicide attempts: 2.7%). Among Chinese adolescents, the most common substance use behavior was “alcohol use (55.4%),” followed by “cigarette use (11.6%).” Among US adolescents, the most popular substance was alcohol (ever used: 55.9%), followed by marijuana (ever used: 34.6%). Moreover, alcohol use was significantly related to suicidal ideation/suicide attempts only in Chinese adolescents [suicidal ideation: Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.71~2.06; suicide attempts: AOR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.71~2.63], and marijuana use was associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in the US adolescent group (suicidal ideation: AOR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.06~1.44; suicide attempts: AOR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.21~1.87). Moreover, although the associations of prescription pain medication use with suicide attempts were significant in both Chinese and US adolescent groups, the adjusted associations were stronger in Chinese adolescents than in US adolescents (Chinese adolescents: AOR = 3.97, 95% CI = 2.76~5.72; US adolescents: AOR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.43~2.16; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The associations of alcohol use with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were only significant in Chinese adolescents. Marijuana use was associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in the US adolescent group. Although the associations of prescription pain medication use with suicide attempts were significant in both Chinese and US adolescent groups, the adjusted associations were significantly stronger for Chinese adolescents. These findings might be related to the differences in cultural contexts, healthcare systems, and public health policies in the two different countries.
Introduction
Adolescence, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as 10–19 years, is a period of immense behavioral, psychological, and social changes. It is also characterized as a stage of elevated exploration and imitation with a range of health risk-taking behaviors (). Although there is no globally uniform definition of health risk-taking behavior, it is generally considered as behaviors that have negative influences on the development of adolescents, such as suicidal behavior and substance use behavior. Suicidal behavior, including suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or suicide deaths, has been a substantial public health problem causing nearly one million deaths worldwide in a given year (), and suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were vital risk factors for death by suicide in late adolescence (). Evidence suggests that suicidal ideation and attempts are still serious problems among adolescents in developing and developed countries. A previous study using data from the 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) showed that about 17.7% of adolescents had suicidal ideation, and 6.5% attempted suicide during the past 12 months (). The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) of the United States, using data from the 2019 YRBSS reported that 18.8% of the adolescents had a history of suicidal ideation, and 8.9% attempted suicide at least one time in the preceding 12 months (). These findings were slightly higher than those described in our prior study among Chinese adolescents, which demonstrated that 16.1% of the students reported having a history of suicidal ideation, and 3.1% reported having attempted suicide ().
Although suicidal behavior is polyfactorial, substance use behaviors are frequently considered one of the most common risk factors for suicidal behavior (, ). According to international drug control conventions, psychoactive substances have clinical significance in strict and reasonable medical use but can be harmful when misused or used for non-medical purposes (). Among adolescents, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and psychoactive and illicit drug use are common substance use behaviors in modern society (). However, these behaviors should be prevented as they can inhibit an individual's growth and maturation. There have been several national survey studies regarding adolescent substance use behaviors worldwide. The United States has carried out a project called the YRBSS since 1990. The 2017 YRBSS results report that cigarette use, alcohol use, and illicit drug use are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality during adolescence and later in life. Psychoactive drugs now make up a more significant part of the overall US drug problem than they did 10–15 years ago (). Although there is no national surveillance system in China to supervise adolescent health risk-taking behaviors, our prior study using data from the SCAHS suggested that substance use behavior among Chinese adolescents is also becoming a significant public health concern ().
Although the associations of substance use behaviors with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among adolescents have been well-established, current knowledge surrounding these associations is mostly derived from Western countries (, ), with only a few studies undertaken in Chinese adolescents (, ). However, it is considered that the variety of cultural contexts, healthcare systems, and public health policies in different regions (), there is little research on comparing the associations between adolescents from two different cultural and ethnic backgrounds. It is reported that the United States focuses on individualism; China's ideology emphasizes collectivism at the same time (). Moreover, the traditional intrinsic socio-cultural values and Confucianism (emphasizing family system, education, hierarchical relationships, and benevolence) have influenced China for thousands of years (), which may make Chinese adolescents differ from their peers in Western countries on the associations of substance use behaviors with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the associations of substance use behaviors with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among US and Chinese adolescents and determine whether the associations are similar or different for the two adolescent groups.
Methods
Study Design and Participants
Data of the US adolescents were drawn from the 2017 YRBSS, which used a three-stage cluster sample design to produce a representative sample of 9 through 12-grade students from regular public, Catholic, and other private schools in the US. One hundred and ninety-two schools were sampled, and the data of a total of 14,765 US adolescents were downloaded and included in the analyses (, ). Data of the Chinese adolescents were drawn from the 2017 SCAHS, which utilized a multi-stage, stratified cluster, random sampling method to produce a representative sample of 7 through 12-grade students from general high schools and vocational high schools in China. Eighty-four schools were sampled, and the data of 24,345 Chinese adolescents were included in the analyses.
Measures
Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts
In the YRBSS and SCAHS, suicidal ideation was assessed with the following question: “during the last 12 months, did you ever seriously consider attempting suicide (yes=1 and no=2)?” Suicide attempts were measured by the question: “during the past 12 months, how many times did you actually attempt suicide?” Available responses were categorized into “yes=1” and “no=2”.
Substance Use Behaviors
Information about substance use was also collected, including cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, methamphetamine use, ecstasy use, and prescription pain medication use. Cigarette use was measured by the question: “have you ever tried cigarette smoking, even one or two puffs? (available responses were categorized into yes=1 and no=2)”. Alcohol use was assessed by the following question: “during your life, on how many days have you had at least one drink of alcohol? (available responses were categorized into yes=1 and no=2)”. Marijuana use was assessed by the question: “during your life, how many times have you used marijuana? (responses were categorized into yes=1 and no=2).” Methamphetamine use was measured by the question: “during your life, how many times have you used methamphetamines (also called speed, crystal, crank, or ice) (available responses were categorized into yes=1 and no=2)?” Ecstasy use was measured by the following question: “during your life, how many times have you used ecstasy (also called MDMA) (responses were categorized into yes=1 and no=2)?” Nonmedical use of prescription pain medication was assessed by the following question: “during your life, how many times have you taken prescription pain medication (e.g., codeine, Vicodin, and Percocet) without a doctor's prescription (available responses were also categorized into yes=1 and no=2)?”
Other Information
In the YRBSS and SCAHS, bullying at school was evaluated by asking students the question: “during the past 12 months, have you ever been bullied on school property? (available responses were coded as yes=1 and no=2).” Feeling sad or hopeless was measured by the question: “during the past 12 months, did you ever feel so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more in a row that you stopped doing some usual activities? (responses were coded as yes=1 and no=2).” Information on sociodemographic variables was also collected, including gender (1=female, 2=male) and age (1=12 years old or younger, 2=13 to 17 years old, 3=18 years old or older).
Ethical Standards
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. The YRBSS was reviewed and approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Institutional Review Board. In the YRBSS, student participation was anonymous and voluntary, and local procedures were followed to obtain parental permission (). The SCAHS was approved by the Sun Yat-sen University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. In the SCAHS, written informed consent was obtained from each participant who was at least 18 years of age. If the participant was aged under 18 years, the written informed consent was obtained from one of the participant's parents (or legal guardians) ().
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive analyses were used to describe sample characteristics, and chi-square tests were performed to compare the differences between the US and Chinese adolescents. Considering both the YRBSS and SCAHS utilized the multi-stage sampling design in which students were clustered into schools, multi-level logistic regression models were fitted in which schools were treated as groups. Multivariable multi-level logistic regression models were first performed to compare the risk for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts between the US and Chinese adolescents. Moreover, stratified analyses were performed to investigate the factors associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in the US and Chinese adolescent groups, and the statistical significance of the differences between the strata was tested by using the 95% confidence interval (CI):. β1 and β2 represented the regression coefficients in each stratum, and SE1 and SE2 were the corresponding standard errors. The Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was also utilized (). Regarding the logistic regression analyses, observations with missing data were eliminated. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata SE 12.0 (StataCorp, Houston, Texas, USA), and two-tailed P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Characteristics of the US and Chinese Adolescents
Among the total participants, the proportion of males was 48.2% among US adolescents and 51.5% among Chinese adolescents. Most US and Chinese adolescents were 13 to 17 years old (86.9% among US adolescents and 81.2% among Chinese adolescents). The proportion of suicidal ideation among US and Chinese adolescents was 17.4 and 13.7%, respectively. The proportion rate of suicide attempts among US adolescents was 5.7%, which was higher than that among Chinese adolescents (2.7%). The proportion of US adolescents who reported being bullied at school was 18.0%, and the proportion among Chinese adolescents was 46.5%. The proportion of participants who reported feeling sad or hopeless among US and Chinese adolescents was 31.4 and 41.2%, respectively. Regarding substance use, the proportions of cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, methamphetamine use, ecstasy use, and prescription pain medication use among US adolescents were higher than those among Chinese adolescents. Additionally, significant differences emerged among US and Chinese adolescents in the distribution of gender, age, being bullied at school, feeling sad or hopeless, cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, methamphetamine use, ecstasy use, prescription pain medication use, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts (P < 0.001) (Table 1).
Table 1
| Variable | Chinese Adolescents (N = 24,345) | US Adolescents (N = 14,765) | P-value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Female | 11732 (48.2) | 7526 (51.0) | <0.001 |
| Male | 12526 (51.5) | 7112 (48.2) | |
| Missing data | 87 (0.4) | 127 (0.9) | |
| Age | |||
| 12 years old or younger | 1907 (7.8) | 59 (0.4) | <0.001 |
| 13 to 17 years old | 19769 (81.2) | 12829 (86.9) | |
| 18 years old or older | 2608 (10.7) | 1796 (12.2) | |
| Missing data | 61 (0.3) | 81 (0.5) | |
| Bullying at school | |||
| Yes | 11323 (46.5) | 2665 (18.0) | <0.001 |
| No | 11934 (49.0) | 11941 (80.9) | |
| Missing data | 1088 (4.5) | 159 (1.1) | |
| Feeling sad or hopeless | |||
| Yes | 10019 (41.2) | 4631 (31.4) | <0.001 |
| No | 14127 (58.0) | 9896 (67.0) | |
| Missing data | 199 (0.8) | 238 (1.6) | |
| Suicidal ideation | |||
| Yes | 3340 (13.7) | 2571 (17.4) | <0.001 |
| No | 20033 (82.3) | 11982 (81.2) | |
| Missing data | 972 (4.0) | 212 (1.4) | |
| Suicide attempts | |||
| Yes | 662 (2.7) | 837 (5.7) | <0.001 |
| No | 23683 (97.3) | 9849 (66.7) | |
| Missing data | 4079 (27.6) | ||
| Cigarette use | |||
| Yes | 2818 (11.6) | 3316 (22.5) | <0.001 |
| No | 21134 (86.8) | 8596 (58.2) | |
| Missing data | 393 (1.6) | 2853 (19.3) | |
| Alcohol use | |||
| Yes | 13481 (55.4) | 8251 (55.9) | <0.001 |
| No | 10509 (43.2) | 5528 (37.4) | |
| Missing data | 355 (1.5) | 986 (6.7) | |
| Marijuana use | |||
| Yes | 120 (0.5) | 5102 (34.6) | <0.001 |
| No | 23965 (98.4) | 9180 (62.2) | |
| Missing data | 260 (1.1) | 483 (3.3) | |
| Methamphetamine use | |||
| Yes | 111 (0.5) | 384 (2.6) | <0.001 |
| No | 24114 (99.1) | 13994 (94.8) | |
| Missing data | 120 (0.5) | 387 (2.6) | |
| Ecstasy use | |||
| Yes | 115 (0.5) | 590 (4.0) | <0.001 |
| No | 24147 (99.2) | 13761 (93.2) | |
| Missing data | 83 (0.3) | 414 (2.8) | |
| Prescription pain medication use | |||
| Yes | 323 (1.3) | 2051 (13.9) | <0.001 |
| No | 23967 (98.4) | 12459 (84.4) | |
| Missing data | 55 (0.2) | 255 (1.7) | |
Characteristics of the Chinese and US adolescents.
The chi-square test was used for categorical variables.
Factors Associated With Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among US and Chinese Adolescents
Both among US and Chinese adolescents, females were at a higher risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts [Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.53~1.77, and AOR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.37~1.78]. Students who were bullied at school were more likely to be involved in suicidal ideation (AOR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.87~2.17) and suicide attempts (AOR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.89~2.47). Adolescents who felt sad were also at a higher risk of suicidal ideation (AOR = 5.61, 95% CI = 5.20~6.06) and suicide attempts (AOR = 5.98, 95% CI = 5.12~6.98). Students who reported cigarette use, alcohol use, and prescription pain medication use were at a higher risk for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Moreover, marijuana use (AOR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01~1.50) and methamphetamine use (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.50~3.54) was only positively associated with suicide attempts. Additionally, compared with Chinese adolescents, US adolescents only had a higher risk of suicide attempts (AOR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.32~2.41) (Table 2).
Table 2
| Variable | Suicidal ideation* | Suicide attempts* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR (95% CI) | P-value | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Female | 1.65 (1.53~1.77) | <0.001 | 1.56 (1.37~1.78) | <0.001 |
| Age | ||||
| 18 years old or older | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| 12 years old or younger | 1.44 (1.17~1.77) | 0.002 | 0.98 (0.67~1.43) | 0.922 |
| 13 to 17 years old | 1.20 (1.07~1.36) | 0.003 | 0.93 (0.75~1.16) | 0.567 |
| Bullying at school | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 2.01 (1.87~2.17) | <0.001 | 2.16 (1.89~2.47) | <0.001 |
| Feeling sad or hopeless | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 5.61 (5.20~6.06) | <0.001 | 5.98 (5.12~6.98) | <0.001 |
| Cigarette use | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 1.45 (1.32~1.59) | <0.001 | 1.90 (1.63~2.22) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol use | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 1.65 (1.52~1.78) | <0.001 | 1.63 (1.39~1.90) | <0.001 |
| Marijuana use | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 0.99 (0.87~1.13) | 0.919 | 1.23 (1.01~1.50) | 0.014 |
| Methamphetamine use | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 1.40 (0.96~2.03) | 0.085 | 2.31 (1.50~3.54) | <0.001 |
| Ecstasy use | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 1.08 (0.79~1.47) | 0.631 | 1.23 (0.86~1.77) | 0.266 |
| Prescription pain medication use | ||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| Yes | 1.77 (1.54~2.03) | <0.001 | 2.01 (1.68~2.42) | <0.001 |
| Nationality | ||||
| Chinese adolescents | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||
| US adolescents | 1.12 (0.95~1.31) | 0.149 | 1.78 (1.32~2.41) | <0.001 |
Factors associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among US and Chinese adolescents.
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
The multivariable logistic regression models for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts incorporating gender, age, bullying at school, feeling sad or hopeless, cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, methamphetamine use, ecstasy use, prescription pain medication use, and nationality.
Comparing the Associations of Substance Use Behaviors With Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Between the US and Chinese Adolescents
As shown in Table 3 and Table 4, alcohol use was significantly related to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in Chinese adolescents (suicidal ideation: AOR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.71~2.06; suicide attempts: AOR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.71~2.63), and marijuana use was associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in US adolescent group (suicidal ideation: AOR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.06~1.44; suicide attempts: AOR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.21~1.87). The association between cigarette use and suicidal ideation (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.50~1.92) was significant only in Chinese adolescents, and the associations between cigarette use and suicide attempts were significant in both Chinese (AOR = 2.57, 95% CI = 2.07~3.19) and US adolescent groups (AOR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.21~1.85). Although the associations of prescription pain medication use with suicide attempts were significant in both Chinese and US adolescent groups, the magnitudes of the adjusted associations were significantly higher in Chinese adolescents than in US adolescents (Chinese group: AOR = 3.97, 95% CI = 2.76~5.72; US group: AOR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.43~2.16; P <0.05).
Table 3
| Variable | Suicidal ideation* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US adolescents | Chinese adolescents | P-value# | Adjusted P-value∧ | |||
| AOR (95% CI) | P-value | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Female | 1.31 (1.15~1.49) | <0.001 | 1.88 (1.72~2.05) | <0.001 | <0.0001 | <0.05 |
| Age | ||||||
| 18 years old or older | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| 13 to 17 years old | 0.81 (0.11~5.92) | 0.840 | 1.35 (1.17~1.55) | <0.001 | 0.47 | 5.17 |
| 12 years old or younger | 1.11 (0.92~1.33) | 0.288 | 1.70 (1.39~2.07) | <0.001 | 0.10 | 1.1 |
| Bullying at school | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 2.23 (1.94~2.56) | <0.001 | 1.95 (1.79~2.13) | <0.001 | 0.11 | 1.21 |
| Feeling sad or hopeless | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 11.01 (9.58~12.66) | <0.001 | 4.07 (3.72~4.46) | <0.001 | 0 | 0 |
| Cigarette use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.15 (0.99~1.34) | 0.082 | 1.70 (1.50~1.92) | <0.001 | 0.0001 | 0.0011 |
| Alcohol use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.08 (0.92~1.26) | 0.362 | 1.88 (1.71~2.06) | <0.001 | <0.0001 | <0.05 |
| Marijuana use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.23 (1.06~1.44) | 0.010 | 0.63 (0.32~1.24) | 0.210 | 0.06 | 0.66 |
| Methamphetamine use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.29 (0.83~2.01) | 0.271 | 1.72 (0.38~7.78) | 0.506 | 0.72 | 7.92 |
| Ecstasy use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.10 (0.78~1.55) | 0.573 | 0.91 (0.20~4.09) | 0.908 | 0.81 | 8.91 |
| Prescription pain medication use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.71 (1.45~2.02) | <0.001 | 2.14 (1.62~2.82) | <0.001 | 0.17 | 1.87 |
Comparing the associations with suicidal ideation between the US and Chinese adolescents.
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
The multivariable logistic regression models for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts incorporating gender, age, bullying at school, feeling sad or hopeless, cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, methamphetamine use, ecstasy use, and prescription pain medication use.
The statistical significance of the differences between the US and Chinese adolescents was tested by using the 95% confidence interval, and the observed P-values were reported.
The adjusted P-values after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
Table 4
| Variable | Suicide attempts* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US adolescents | Chinese adolescents | P-value# | Adjusted P-value∧ | |||
| AOR (95% CI) | P value | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Female | 1.36 (1.13~1.65) | 0.003 | 1.90 (1.58~2.29) | <0.001 | 0.015 | 0.165 |
| Age | ||||||
| 18 years old or older | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| 13 to 17 years old | 1.19 (0.92~1.54) | 0.195 | 1.59 (1.15~2.22) | 0.014 | 0.032 | 0.352 |
| 12 years old or younger | 17.98 (2.01~160.50) | 0.012 | 2.38 (1.55~3.65) | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.077 |
| Bullying at school | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 2.34 (1.95~2.80) | <0.001 | 2.25 (1.85~2.73) | <0.001 | 0.774 | 8.514 |
| Feeling sad or hopeless | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 9.85 (7.78~12.46) | <0.001 | 3.58 (2.92~4.39) | <0.001 | <0.0001 | <0.05 |
| Cigarette use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.50 (1.21~1.85) | <0.001 | 2.57 (2.07~3.19) | <0.001 | 0.0005 | 0.0055 |
| Alcohol use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 0.97 (0.76~1.23) | 0.779 | 2.12 (1.71~2.63) | <0.001 | <0.0001 | <0.05 |
| Marijuana use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.51 (1.21~1.87) | <0.001 | 1.78 (0.64~4.98) | 0.298 | 0.754 | 8.294 |
| Methamphetamine use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.87 (1.16~3.01) | 0.014 | 20.61 (1.92~220.88) | 0.041 | 0.052 | 0.572 |
| Ecstasy use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.26 (0.86~1.86) | 0.244 | 0.16 (0.01~1.86) | 0.186 | 0.103 | 1.133 |
| Prescription pain medication use | ||||||
| No | 1.00 (reference) | 1.00 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 1.76 (1.43~2.16) | <0.001 | 3.97 (2.76~5.72) | <0.001 | 0.0001 | 0.0011 |
Comparing the associations with suicide attempts between the US and Chinese adolescents.
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
The multivariable logistic regression models for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts incorporating gender, age, bullying at school, feeling sad or hopeless, cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, methamphetamine use, ecstasy use, and prescription pain medication use.
The statistical significance of the differences between the US and Chinese adolescents was tested by using the 95% confidence interval, and the observed P-values were reported.
The adjusted P-values after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
Discussion
This study, using data from the 2017 YRBSS and 2017 SCAHS, sought to investigate the associations of substance use behaviors with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among US and Chinese adolescents and determine whether the associations are similar or different for adolescents from two different countries (i.e., the United States and China). The study results revealed that among Chinese adolescents, the most common substance use behavior was “alcohol use (55.4%),” followed by “cigarette use (11.6%),” “prescription pain medication use (1.3%),” and “marijuana/methamphetamine/ ecstasy use (0.5%).” Among US adolescents, the most popular substance was alcohol (ever used: 55.9%), followed by marijuana (ever used: 34.6%), cigarette (ever used, 22.5%), prescription pain medication (ever used: 13.9%), ecstasy (ever used: 4.0%), and methamphetamine (ever used: 2.6%). Moreover, the proportions of students who reported substance use (including cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, methamphetamine use, ecstasy use, and prescription pain medication use) were higher in the US adolescent group than in Chinese adolescent group (P <0.001). These results may be related to the cultural values and socialization practices (), and previous evidence has suggested that culture plays a central role in forming individuals' cognitions about the potential problems they may face with substance use (). More specifically, it has been suggested that alcohol drinking is a worldwide phenomenon, which is closely associated with many social activities (such as ceremonies and festivals) (). In this study, alcohol use accounted for more than fifty percent of both the US and the Chinese adolescent group, reflecting that although alcohol's hazards have gradually been recognized by the Chinese and US public, it is clear that more preventive policies and programs need to be accomplished. A prior review demonstrated that China's current public health systems could not monitor or respond well to alcohol drinking and alcohol-related problems (). Regarding drug misuse, China is thought of as a country that has been rigorous in controlling its drug problems. China has carried out a nationwide campaign to eliminate widespread drug trafficking and abuse according to strictly punishing people involved in growing, transporting, and/or trafficking illicit drugs since the early 1950s (). In the present study, the observed proportion rate of marijuana/ methamphetamine/ ecstasy/ prescription pain medication use in the Chinese adolescent group was far below that in the US adolescent group. It is notable that although the illicit drug use (e.g., marijuana, methamphetamine, or ecstasy use surveyed in this study) among Chinese adolescents is less common (), non-medical use of prescription medications has become more prevalent (). This finding indicates that although the traditional Chinese style of parenting and schooling focuses on strict discipline for misbehavior, global financial and political development may have influenced Chinese adolescents' cultural environment. Moreover, with marijuana being widely legalized for recreational and medicinal purposes in the United States, marijuana use is widespread among US adolescents (), resulting in the observed higher proportion rate of marijuana use among US adolescents in the present study. Regardless of the differences in culture or the economic, geographical, and political context, it appears that substance use behaviors are common among adolescents in both US and China in contemporary society, making prevention of adolescent substance use a public health priority.
Moreover, this study found that the proportions of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were respectively 17.4 and 5.7% among US adolescents, which were higher than those among Chinese adolescents (suicidal ideation: 13.7% and suicide attempts: 2.7%); these results were consistent with previous studies (31, 32). In line with prior studies (32), we found that in females, being bullied, feeling sad, cigarette use, alcohol use, and prescription pain medication use were positively associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. These findings suggest that we should mainly focus on those students who present with the aforementioned negative characteristics. Moreover, this study showed that, compared with Chinese adolescents, US adolescents had 1.78 times higher risk of suicide attempts. One possible explanation for this finding might be that due to the influence of traditional Confucian culture (e.g., interpersonal obligations and particularistic role duties) (33), Chinese adolescents may be hesitant or reluctant to disclose their suicidal behavior for the influences of social desirability or parental monitoring (34).
Further stratified analyses were performed to compare the associations of substance use behaviors with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in the US and Chinese adolescents. The study findings showed that alcohol use was significantly related to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in Chinese adolescents, and marijuana use was associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in the US adolescent group. Moreover, although the associations of prescription pain medication use with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were significant in both Chinese and US adolescent groups, the magnitudes of the adjusted associations were significantly higher in Chinese adolescents than those in US adolescents. Similarly, previous studies have also identified the associations between substance use and suicidal behavior (, , , 35, 36). These results might be related to the idea that substance use may lead to suicidal behavior via impaired judgment, impulsiveness, or loss of inhibition (37).
Moreover, the differences in the associations between substance use and suicidal behavior in the two adolescent groups may be attributed to the different types of prevalent substances. In the present study, it appears that drinking or smoking is more common than other substance use behavior among adolescents in China, and marijuana use was more prevalent in the US adolescent group. Regarding the only significant associations of marijuana use with suicidal behaviors observed in US adolescent group, one potential explanation might be that a smaller sample size of Chinese adolescents reporting marijuana use could not have enough power to yield significant findings. Regarding the higher magnitudes of associations between alcohol/prescription pain medication/cigarette use and suicidal behavior observed in the Chinese adolescent group, a possible explanation from the cultural framework may be that US adolescents may consider this substance use as a personal decision; however, Chinese adolescents were more likely than US adolescents to be influenced by substance use behaviors and to consider these substance uses to be more wrong or even resulting in having suicidal ideation or taking suicide attempts (38). Another explanation based on social epidemiological theories posits that an individual's suicide risk depends not only on their traits and experiences but also on the interplay between social, economic, and environmental factors (39). Although some adolescent suicide prevention interventions (e.g., school-based interventions) have been shown to reduce suicidal behaviors among adolescents in high-income countries effectively, there is a lack of evidence on effective policies or interventions to reduce youth suicidal behaviors from low- and middle-income countries (40).
Based on our study results, we suggest that effective prevention and intervention programs should be established, and the role of the government and social settings should be considered. First, the World Health Organization has proposed that health promotions focused on achieving equality in health and the government's role were crucial for public health (41). The United States government has established several national systems (e.g., YRBSS and Monitoring the Future). A proper surveillance system is suggested to be developed by the Chinese government to monitor and control substance use and suicidal behaviors among adolescents in the long term. Second, family and school roles were well-known factors associated with adolescent health risk-taking behaviors. Along these lines, parents and schools should focus on substance use and suicidal behaviors among adolescents, particularly among those who struggle with family-related or school-related relationship difficulties (42). Third, these study findings may provide preliminary evidence about the importance of focusing on different prevalent substances among US and Chinese adolescents. Early prevention and intervention strategies are recommended to promote resilience among adolescents involved in substance use behaviors to prevent suicidal behavior. For example, school-based intervention programs (including screening, gatekeeper training, peer leadership training, and skills training) may help decrease suicidal behaviors (43, 44). Fourth, to strengthen regulations to supervise adolescents' access to substances (e.g., limiting the sales of alcohol or marijuana to adolescents) may help reduce risky health behaviors (including substance use and suicidal behaviors) among adolescents.
Several limitations of the present study should be noted. First, both YRBSS and SCAHS utilized a school-based design and only included school students. Those adolescents who had dropped out of school were not incorporated; however, substance use behaviors or suicidal behaviors, which are both cause and consequence of their lack of success in school, maybe more common among them (45, 46). A community-based design that can invite adolescents who have dropped out of school is needed in our future study. Second, due to the cross-sectional nature of the YRBSS and SCAHS data, no causal inference can be derived from the associations reported in the paper. The associations need to be further assessed in longitudinal/prospective studies. Third, both YRBSS and SCAHS used the structured self-report questionnaire to collect data. The recall bias cannot be ruled out and may lead to underestimating substance use or suicidal behavior due to social desirability. However, anonymous and voluntary participation is assured in the YRBSS and SCAHS, and this method may have helped in collecting accurate information. Despite these limitations, this study provides evidence of the cross-cultural differences in adolescent substance use and suicidal behaviors. Also, it lays the groundwork for future studies to investigate the mechanism of the differences in substance use and suicidal behaviors between the US and Chinese adolescents.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the present study highlighted that alcohol drinking and cigarette use are more common than other substance use behavior among Chinese adolescents. After alcohol, the second most popular type of substance was marijuana in the US adolescent group. The stratified results also showed that alcohol use was significantly related to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in Chinese adolescents, and marijuana use was associated with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts only in the US adolescent group. Although the associations of prescription pain medication use with suicide attempts were significant in both Chinese and US adolescent groups, the magnitudes of the adjusted associations were significantly higher in Chinese adolescents. These findings suggest that effective prevention and intervention programs are highly recommended to improve the awareness of the adverse effects of substance use and suicidal behavior among adolescents, their families, and schools; to promote resilience among adolescents who have been involved in substance use and suicidal behaviors; to strengthen the active surveillance of these health risk-taking behaviors among adolescents.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: Data for the SCAHS in China are available through the Sun Yat-sen University. Contact Ciyong Lu for access approval. Data for the YRBSS in the United States are public and are available on the website: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/data.htm.
Ethics statement
The YRBSS study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Institutional Review Board; student participation is anonymous and voluntary, and local procedures were followed to obtain parental permission. The SCAHS study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by this study received ethical approval from the Sun Yat-sen University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board; written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.
Author contributions
LG and CL had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. LG, WW, and CL: concept, design, and drafting of the manuscript. YG, WW, WL, MZ, and RW: statistical analysis. LG and CL: administrative, technical, or material support. LG and CL: supervision. All authors: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81903339), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant Nos. 2018A0303130331 and 2019A1515011091), and the Science Foundation for the Youth Scholars of Sun Yat-sen University (Grant No. 18ykpy15).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
World Health Organization. Health for the World's Adolescents-A second chance in the second decade. (2014). Available online at: http://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/ (accessed November 16, 2018).
2.
MannJJApterABertoloteJBeautraisACurrierDHaasAet al. Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. JAMA. (2005) 294:2064–74. 10.1001/jama.294.16.2064
3.
BilsenJ. Suicide and youth: risk factors. Front Psychiatry. (2018) 9:540. 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00540
4.
BaidenPGraafGZaamiMAcolatseCKAdekuY. Examining the association between prescription opioid misuse and suicidal behaviors among adolescent high school students in the United States. J Psychiatr Res. (2019) 112:44–51. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.02.018
5.
Ivey-StephensonAZDemissieZCrosbyAEStoneDMGaylorEWilkinsNet al. Suicidal ideation and behaviors among high school students—youth risk behavior survey, United States, 2019. MMWR Suppl. (2020) 69:47–55. 10.15585/mmwr.su6901a6
6.
GuoLLuoMWangWXiaoDXiCWangTet al. Association between nonmedical use of opioids or sedatives and suicidal behavior among Chinese adolescents: an analysis of sex differences. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2019) 53:559–69. 10.1177/0004867418814944
7.
WittKLubmanDI. Effective suicide prevention: where is the discussion on alcohol?Aust N Z J Psychiatry. (2018) 52:507–8. 10.1177/0004867418774415
8.
GuoLXuYDengJHuangJHuangGGaoXet al. Association between nonmedical use of prescription drugs and suicidal behavior among adolescents. Jama Pediatr. (2016) 170:971–8. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1802
9.
Burke-ShyneNCseteJWilsonDFoxEWolfeDRasanathanJ. How drug control policy and practice undermine access to controlled medicines. Health Hum Rights. (2017) 19:237–252.
10.
MyersMGKellyJF. Cigarette smoking among adolescents with alcohol and other drug use problems. Alcohol Res Health. (2006) 29:221–7.
11.
KannLMcManusTHarrisWAShanklinSLFlintKHQueenBet al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. (2018) 67:1–114. 10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1
12.
GuoLWangTWangWHuangGXuYLuC. Trends in health-risk behaviors among Chinese adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:1902. 10.3390/ijerph16111902
13.
ClaytonHBBohmMKLowryRAshleyCEthierKA. Prescription opioid misuse associated with risk behaviors among adolescents. Am J Prev Med. (2019) 57:533–9. 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.05.017
14.
DivinALZulligKJ. The association between non-medical prescription drug use and suicidal behavior among United States adolescents. AIMS Public Health. (2014) 1:226–40. 10.3934/publichealth.2014.4.226
15.
WangJXuYGuoLDengJXHuangJHHuangGLet al. The mediating effects of depressive symptoms and sleep quality on the relationship between the non-medical use of prescription drugs and suicidal behaviors among Chinese adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2017) 178:20–7. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.044
16.
TisakMSTisakJChenYFangQBakerER. Adolescent misconduct behaviors: a cross-cultural perspective of adolescents and their parents. J Cross Cult Psychol. (2017) 48:155–67. 10.1177/0022022116681844
17.
TriandisHCMcCuskerCHuiCH. Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1990) 59:1006–20. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1006
18.
GaoEZuoXWangLLouCChengYZabinLS. How does traditional Confucian culture influence adolescents' sexual behavior in three Asian cities?J Adolesc Health. (2012) 50:S12–7. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.002
19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. YRBSS Data & Documentation. Available onine at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/data.htm (accessed March 11, 2019).
20.
FotiKBalajiAShanklinS. Uses of youth risk behavior survey and school health profiles data: applications for improving adolescent and school health. J Sch Health. (2011) 81:345–54. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00601.x
21.
HolmanDMJonesSEQinJRichardsonLC. Prevalence of indoor tanning among U.S. high school students from 2009 to 2017. J Community Health. (2019) 44:1086–9. 10.1007/s10900-019-00685-y
22.
GuoLXuYDengJGaoXHuangGHuangJet al. Associations between childhood maltreatment and non-medical use of prescription drugs among Chinese adolescents. Addiction. (2017)112:1600–9. 10.1111/add.13850
23.
NobleWS. How does multiple testing correction work?Nat Biotechnol. (2009) 27:1135–7. 10.1038/nbt1209-1135
24.
BradyLMFrybergSAShodaY. Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018)115:11406–13. 10.1073/pnas.1803526115
25.
UngerJB. Special issue on culture and substance use. Subst Use Misuse. (2014)49:919–21. 10.3109/10826084.2014.887384
26.
SavicMRoomRMugavinJPennayALivingstonM. Defining “drinking culture”: a critical review of its meaning and connotation in social research on alcohol problems. Drug Educ Prev Polic. (2016) 23:270–82. 10.3109/09687637.2016.1153602
27.
YangMJ. The Chinese drinking problem: a review of the literature and its implication in a cross-cultural study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. (2002) 18:543–50.
28.
McCoyCBMcCoyHVLaiSYuZWangXMengJ. Reawakening the dragon: changing patterns of opiate use in Asia, with particular emphasis on China's Yunnan province. Subst Use Misuse. (2001) 36:49–69. 10.1081/ja-100000228
29.
GuoLLiPPanSLiMLiWGaoXet al. Associations of childhood maltreatment with subsequent illicit drug use among Chinese adolescents: the moderating role of the child's sex. Psychiatry Res. (2018)269:361–8. 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.088
30.
YuBChenXChenXYanH. Marijuana legalization and historical trends in marijuana use among US residents aged 12–25: results from the 1979–2016 National Survey on drug use and health. Bmc Public Health. (2020)20:156. 10.1186/s12889-020-8253-4
31.
NowotnyKMPetersonRLBoardmanJD. Gendered contexts. J Health Soc Behav. (2015)56:114–30. 10.1177/0022146514568350
32.
GuoLXuYDengJHuangJHuangGGaoXet al. Association between sleep duration, suicidal ideation, and suicidal attempts among Chinese adolescents: The moderating role of depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. (2017) 208:355–362. 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.004
33.
HuXChenSXZhangLYuFPengKLiuL. Do Chinese traditional and modern cultures affect young adults' moral priorities?Front Psychol. (2018) 9:1799. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01799
34.
ChangHYanQTangLHuangJMaYYeXet al. A comparative analysis of suicide attempts in left-behind children and non-left-behind children in rural China. PLoS ONE. (2017)12:e0178743. 10.1371/journal.pone.0178743
35.
ParkSKimJ. Association between smoking and suicidal behaviors among adolescents in the Republic of Korea. J Addict Nurs. (2015)26:175–83. 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000095
36.
NorstromTRossowI. Alcohol consumption as a risk factor for suicidal behavior: a systematic review of associations at the individual and at the population level. Arch Suicide Res. (2016)20:489–506. 10.1080/13811118.2016.1158678
37.
CrewsFTBoettigerCA. Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (2009) 93:237–47. 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.04.018
38.
JessorRTurbinMSCostaFMDongQZhangHWangC. Adolescent problem behavior in China and the United States: a cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. J Res Adolescence. (2003)13:329–60. 10.1111/1532-7795.1303004
39.
NeelemanJ. Beyond risk theory: suicidal behavior in its social and epidemiological context. Crisis. (2002)23:114–20. 10.1027//0227-5910.23.3.114
40.
McKinnonBGariepyGSentenacMElgarFJ. Adolescent suicidal behaviours in 32 low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. (2016) 94:340–50F. 10.2471/BLT.15.163295
41.
VilhjalmssonR. Public views on the role of government in funding and delivering health services. Scand J Public Health. (2016). 10.1177/1403494816631872
42.
SpilkovaJDzurovaDPitonakM. Perception of neighborhood environment and health risk behaviors in Prague's teenagers: a pilot study in a post-communist city. Int J Health Geogr. (2014)13:41. 10.1186/1476-072X-13-41
43.
KatzCBoltonSLKatzLYIsaakCTilston-JonesTSareenJ. A systematic review of school-based suicide prevention programs. Depress Anxiety. (2013) 30:1030–45. 10.1002/da.22114
44.
BennettKRhodesAEDudaSCheungAHManassisKLinksPet al. A youth suicide prevention plan for canada: a systematic review of reviews. Can J Psychiatry. (2015)60:245–57. 10.1177/070674371506000603
45.
TownsendLFlisherAJKingG. A systematic review of the relationship between high school dropout and substance use. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. (2007)10:295–317. 10.1007/s10567-007-0023-7
46.
EpsteinSRobertsESedgwickRPollingCFinningKFordTet al. School absenteeism as a risk factor for self-harm and suicidal ideation in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Child Adoles Psy. (2019)29:1175–94. 10.1007/s00787-019-01327-3
Summary
Keywords
Chinese adolescents, US adolescents, substance use behavior, suicidal behavior, comparison
Citation
Guo L, Wang W, Du X, Guo Y, Li W, Zhao M, Wu R and Lu C (2021) Associations of Substance Use Behaviors With Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among US and Chinese Adolescents. Front. Psychiatry 11:611579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.611579
Received
30 September 2020
Accepted
14 December 2020
Published
18 January 2021
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Marco Innamorati, European University of Rome, Italy
Reviewed by
Xenia Gonda, Semmelweis University, Hungary; Alberto Forte, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Guo, Wang, Du, Guo, Li, Zhao, Wu and Lu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ciyong Lu luciyong@mail.sysu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.