In the published article, there was an error in the Affiliations for Dag Anders Ulvestad. As well as having affiliation 1, he should also have affiliation 2 ‘Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway’.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, mentalizing, mentalization breakdown, reflective functioning, assessment method, validation
Citation
Ulvestad DA, Johansen MS, Kvarstein EH, Pedersen G and Wilberg T (2024) Corrigendum: Minding mentalizing – convergent validity of the Mentalization Breakdown Interview. Front. Psychiatry 15:1479612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1479612
Received
12 August 2024
Accepted
13 August 2024
Published
21 August 2024
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
15 - 2024
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Ulvestad, Johansen, Kvarstein, Pedersen and Wilberg.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dag Anders Ulvestad, sbulvd@ous-hf.no
†ORCID: Dag Anders Ulvestad, orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-3117
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.