ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry, 03 April 2025

Sec. Anxiety and Stress Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1490785

Dissociation in skin picking disorder and trichotillomania

  • 1. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

  • 2. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

Abstract

Introduction:

Dissociation involves a lapse in normal perception of reality or awareness; it has Q6 been associated with multiple psychiatric disorders and has been suggested as a contributing factor in trichotillomania and skin picking disorder. This study aimed to explore the relationship between dissociation and trichotillomania and/or skin picking disorder.

Methods:

Three hundred and seventy adults with trichotillomania, skin picking disorder, or both (aged 18-65 years) were enrolled as part of an online survey. Participants completed a questionnaire on demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and suicidality. Participants completed the Generic Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors (BFRB) Scale-8 (GBS-8) and the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES). Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between DES scores and GBS-8 scores, as well as clinical characteristics.

Results:

DES scores significantly predicted GBS-8 impairment scores, suicidal ideation, non-suicidal self-injury, and suicide attempts.

Discussion:

Dissociation may be either a driving force for many with hair pulling or skin picking, or pulling and picking may create a dissociative trance-like state. These findings suggest that dissociation is associated with greater impairment and worse clinical outcomes. Further research may elucidate whether there is benefit in treating dissociation in these patients.

1 Introduction

Dissociation is a fairly common phenomenon in which people feel disconnected from themselves, the world, time, or reality and is due to a failure to integrate perception, memory, cognition and emotions that leads to disruption in normal perception of reality (1). Dissociation may lead to periods where people lack conscious awareness and experience a loss of time, change in location, or engage in behaviors that they do not remember. This phenomenon has been reported across many psychiatric disorders (2), and yet the dissociative experience is poorly understood.

Research has explored dissociation and its relationship with obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. Studies have found a relationship between the severity of obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms and frequency of dissociative experiences (1, 3–5) as well as a relationship between time spent gazing in the mirror and resultant dissociation in cases of anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder (6, 7). Trichotillomania and skin picking disorder have been categorized as obsessive-compulsive related disorders due to several shared features with OCD (8–10), which make them compelling conditions to study in relation to dissociation. Lochner and colleagues 11 found that scores of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) were significantly higher in trichotillomania patients than in skin picking patients. Ozten and colleagues 12 examined dissociation in trichotillomania, skin picking disorder, and healthy controls and found that the three groups did not statistically differ in terms of their scores on the DES.

Given this limited research, as well as a lack of understanding as to whether dissociation relates to symptom severity and clinical characteristics in trichotillomania or skin picking disorder, the purpose of this investigation was to clarify a possible link between dissociation scores and trichotillomania and skin picking disorder. We hypothesized that greater levels of dissociation would be related to worse clinical symptoms of hair pulling and skin picking.

2 Methods

2.1 Participants

A total of 424 participants were recruited for an online survey using media advertisements and online websites. Inclusion criteria included being an adult aged 18-65 years with a DSM-5 diagnosis of trichotillomania or skin picking disorder. Participants were excluded if they were unable to consent or unable to complete the study due to lack of English fluency. This study and consent statement were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Chicago.

Participants were first required to view the Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved online informed consent page, at which point an individual could choose to participate in the survey or opt out. The survey asserted that all information was confidential. The survey was open from 4/20/23 to 5/11/23. Participants were compensated for their participation by being included in a raffle where 15 individuals were randomly chosen to receive a $100 gift certificate. Participants were assured that their contact details for the prize draw would be stored separately from their survey responses in order to ensure that their responses were kept completely confidential. Only those individuals completing all measures were reported in the analyses.

Quality checks were performed through rule logic used throughout the survey, which automatically vetted responses for inclusion/exclusion criteria and checked for discrepancies. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) automatically kicked out users who had already completed the survey on a particular device. It also captured the time taken to complete the survey, and people who completed it in <10 minutes were flagged. The data comparison module on REDCap was used after data collection to assess for duplicate/very similar responses. Each response was also reviewed individually to check for inconsistency or very bizarre responses.

2.2 Assessments

Participants completed a demographic questionnaire which provided information on their age, sex, gender identity, highest level of education, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, and annual household income. They were then asked to self-report whether they had a diagnosis of trichotillomania, skin picking disorder, or both, which was verified by their completion of the Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview version 2.0 (MIDI 2.0) (13). They also completed a self-report survey assessing history of comorbidities, substance use, current medications, suicidal ideation, and non-suicidal self-injury.

Participants completed the Generic BFRB Scale-8 (GBS-8), an eight-question validated scale which assesses the severity of both trichotillomania and skin picking disorder (α = 0.804) (14). The GBS-8 includes a severity subscale (items 1-4) and an impairment subscale (items 5-8) (α = 0.757 and α = 0.753, respectively).

Lastly, participants completed the DES, a 28-question scale used to measure frequency of various dissociative experiences (α = 0.966) (15). Scores on the DES range from 0 to 100; scores that are over 30 indicate high dissociation, while scores below 30 indicate low dissociation. The DES also consists of three subscales: amnesia, depersonalization/derealization, and absorption. Amnesia factor measures memory loss (i.e., not knowing how you arrived somewhere, finding new items that you don’t recall buying) (α = 0.940). Depersonalization/Derealization factor measures detachment from oneself or a feeling of unreality (i.e., feeling that you’re standing next to yourself, not recognizing yourself in a mirror) (α = 0.913). Absorption factor measures preoccupation with something that is so intense it distracts you from what you’re doing (i.e., memories are so vivid that they feel relived, being so absorbed by a movie that you’re unaware of other things happening) (α = 0.862) (15).

2.3 Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 29.0). Demographic data and descriptive statistics of the DES were calculated including sample mean and standard deviation (SD). Frequency distribution was also calculated for the DES total score with a standard cutoff score of 30 indicating high dissociation. The relationship between DES score and GBS-8 score was analyzed using linear regression, and the relationship between DES score and various clinical outcomes was analyzed using either linear or binary logistic regression. The significance level for each analysis was set at p < 0.05. One-way ANOVA was used for comparison between groups, and Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the relationship between variables. The Wald Test was used to determine the significance of variables in logistic regression.

3 Results

3.1 Demographics and descriptive statistics

Data were collected for 424 participants, but 370 participants were included in the final analysis based on exclusion criteria. The average age of participants was 29.2 ± 7.7 years. Other sociodemographic characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Sample CharacteristicsN%
Sex
  Female29078.4
  Male7720.8
Intersex3.8
Gender Identity
  Woman26772.2
  Man8322.4
  Nonbinary133.5
Other2.5
  Not reported51.4
Education
 Less than high school102.7
 High school318.4
 Some college7921.4
 Trade school246.5
 University degree14037.8
 Postgraduate degree or more8623.2
Sexual Orientation
  Heterosexual24566.2
  Homosexual246.5
  Bisexual7319.7
  Questioning51.4
  Other205.4
 Not reported3.8
Race
 White31785.7
 Black164.3
 Asian102.7
 Native American3.8
 Other2.5
 Multiple205.4
Ethnicity
 Not Hispanic29980.8
 Hispanic6016.2
 Not reported113.0
Annual Household Income
 $0 - $24,9993710.0
 $25,000 - $49,9996317.0
 $50,000 - $74,9996918.6
 $75,000 - $99,9996417.3
 $100,000 - $149,9996116.5
 $150,000 or more4612.4
 Not reported308.1
Comorbidities
 Agoraphobia256.8
 Alcohol use disorder215.7
 Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder11531.1
 Autism spectrum disorder359.5
 Bipolar disorder297.8
 Body dysmorphic disorder267.0
 Borderline personality disorder154.1
 Eating disorder5414.6
 Generalized anxiety disorder19452.4
 Hoarding disorder41.1
 Major depressive disorder18650.3
 Obsessive-compulsive disorder7520.3
 Panic disorder5414.6
 Post-traumatic stress disorder4512.2
 Schizophrenia71.9
 Social anxiety disorder10728.9
 Substance use disorder154.1
 Tic disorder102.7
 Other111
 None4010.8
Substance use (in the past year)
 Amphetamines164.3
 Anabolic steroids0100.0
 Cannabis13035.1
 Cocaine267.0
 Dissociative drugs184.9
 Hallucinogens4512.2
 Inhalants92.4
 Opiates236.2
 Sedatives154.1
 Other10.3
 None19753.2
Medications
 Antidepressants16143.5
 Antipsychotics277.3
 Anxiolytics8021.6
 Medications prescribed for ADHD6918.6
 Medications prescribed for BFRBs195.1
 Mood stabilizers267.0
 Sleep aids359.5
 Other41.1
 None13135.4

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants.

ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BFRB, body-focused repetitive behaviors.

Of the 370 participants, 99 had trichotillomania (26.8%), 176 had skin picking disorder (47.5%), and 95 had comorbid trichotillomania and skin picking disorder (25.7%). The mean DES score for trichotillomania, skin picking disorder, and comorbid trichotillomania plus skin picking disorder were 35.8, 28.1, and 32.7, respectively (Table 2). Notably, the full sample’s mean DES score was 31.3 (SD = 21.5), with 178 participants (48.1%) scoring above the 30 point cutoff for high dissociation (Figure 1).

Table 2

SampleN%DES
MSD
All370100.031.321.5
TTM9926.835.825.3
SPD17647.528.120.0
TTM and SPD9525.732.719.0

Descriptive Statistics of the Dissociative Experience Scale.

DES, Dissociative Experience Scale; TTM, trichotillomania; SPD, skin picking disorder; M, mean; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 1

3.2 Linear regression analysis predicting GBS-8 score

Linear regression was used to analyze whether dissociation (DES score) was associated with severity of trichotillomania and skin picking disorder using the GBS-8 total score. The results suggested that the predictive model was statistically significant, where DES score explained 11% of the variance of GBS-8 score (R2 = .110, F = 45.616, p <.001). DES score appeared to predict GBS-8 score, β = .068, t = 6.754, p <.001. Similar findings were reported when looking at the DES subscales and their association with the GBS-8: amnesia (R2 = .084, F = 33.662, p <.001; β = .052, t = 5.802, p <.001); depersonalization/derealization (R2 = .091, F = 36.645, p <.001; β = .053, t = 6.054, p <.001); absorption (R2 = .094, F = 38.127, p <.001; β = .059, t = 6.175, p <.001) (Table 3).

Table 3

VariableβSE95% CIP
LLUL
DES.068.010.048.088<.001*
Amnesia.052.009.035.070<.001*
Depersonalization/Derealization.053.009.036.071<.001*
Absorption.059.010.040.078<.001*

Linear regression: DES score predicting GBS-8 score.

* indicates p < 0.05, n = 370.

DES, Dissociative Experience Scale; GBS-8= Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors Scale-8; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit.

3.3 Regression analysis predicting clinical outcomes

Further regression analysis suggested that DES scores were also associated with clinical outcomes related to compulsive behaviors. More specifically, DES score was associated with GBS-8 impairment score (R2 = .199, F = 91.502, p <.001; β = .057, t = 9.566, p <.001), but not GBS-8 severity. Several binary logistic regressions were performed to investigate whether DES score could predict factors related to suicidality. The odds ratios for each regression were: suicidal ideation (Exp(β) = 1.021, 95% CI [1.008, 1.342], p = .001), non-suicidal self-injury (Exp(β) = 1.025, 95% CI [1.014, 1.035], p <.001), and history of suicide attempt (Exp(β) = 1.033, 95% CI [1.021, 1.044], p <.001) (Table 4).

Table 4

EffectNβSEWald95% CI for βExp(β)P
LLUL
GBS-8 Severitya370.011.006.000.022.058
GBS-8 Impairmenta370.057.006.046.069<.001*
Suicidal Ideationb370.021.00710.1171.0081.0341.021.001*
Non-Suicidal Self-Injuryb369.024.00520.8851.0141.0351.025<.001*
Suicide Attemptb368.032.00632.1051.0211.0441.033<.001*

Regression analyses: DES score predicting clinical outcomes.

* indicates p < 0.05.

aLinear regression, bBinary logistic regression.

DES, Dissociative Experience Scale; GBS-8= Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors Scale-8; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit.

4 Discussion

Consistent with previous literature, these findings suggest that individuals with trichotillomania (35.8 ± 25.3) and skin picking disorder (28.1 ± 20.0) report greater severity of dissociation (based on DES total scores) than a non-clinical adult population (11.57 ± 10.63) and a general psychiatric patient population (16.67 ± 16.41) (16). The DES scores for this study are more aligned with that of other dissociative disorders, which collectively have a mean DES of 41.22 ± 21.99 (16). These findings are consistent with many clinical observations of trichotillomania and skin picking disorder patients who often report being unable to recall how long or even if they have been pulling and picking. Interestingly, our sample also had higher mean DES scores than reported in two previous studies of trichotillomania and skin picking disorder (11, 12). This could be due to a unique feature of the participants in this study or the significantly larger sample size. These new findings may suggest that people with trichotillomania and skin picking disorder experience dissociation at a greater level than previously reported in the literature.

Additionally, this study explored the impact of dissociation on trichotillomania and skin picking disorder by examining several clinical variables and found that dissociation, as measured by DES score, was associated with greater impairment, higher likelihood of self-injury, and increased suicidal ideation and attempts. There was not a significant relationship between pulling and picking severity and DES scores, however. This finding might suggest that some people who experience dissociation may not recall the urges or time spent pulling and picking (which the GBS-8 uses to measure severity). While one theory is that dissociation results in worse pulling and picking, it is also plausible that hair pulling or skin picking creates a trance-like state for patients in which they find themselves dissociating.

It is important to be cautious when applying these study findings as they lack longitudinal data and are limited to associations that cannot determine causality. Additionally, this study relied on self-reported data; thus, findings may be impacted by participants over-reporting or under-reporting of diagnoses and symptoms. Future research should aim to elucidate the causal factor in this relationship to further characterize the association and determine whether treatment of dissociation is warranted. Studies of impulsive self-injurious behavior in borderline personality disorder patients and eating disorder patients have suggested that impulse control may be mediated, in part, by dissociative experiences (17). Therefore, understanding the complex interplay of impulsivity, dissociation, and pulling and picking may be a useful future direction.

A potential limitation of this study is the participants were not assessed for anxiety symptoms. Episodic anxiety in non-dissociative psychiatric disorders may artificially elevate DES scores. The experience of depersonalization and derealization has long been hypothesized to occur during states of anxiety (18). Trichotillomania and skin picking disorder often have a prominent component of anxiety (19), and the question arises whether the elevated DES scores merely reflect elevated anxiety. Finally, the inability to analyze certain clinical outcomes of interest such as presence of comorbidities and substance use, due to poor fit of their regression models. These would provide more insight into the impact that dissociation has on patients with compulsive behaviors beyond this study.

In summary, these preliminary data suggest that adults with trichotillomania and skin picking disorder experience dissociative symptoms, as reflected on the DES scale, to a significant degree in many cases. Further studies, possibly with other scales of dissociation, are needed to elucidate further the cognitive experiences of these people.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by University of Chicago Institutional Review Board. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

ZC: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    BelliH. Dissociative symptoms and dissociative disorders comorbidity in obsessive compulsive disorder: Symptom screening, diagnostic tools and reflections on treatment. World J Clin Cases. (2014) 2:327–31. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i8.327

  • 2

    LyssenkoLSchmahlCBockhackerLVonderlinRBohusMKleindienstN. Dissociation in psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of studies using the dissociative experiences scale. Am J Psychiatry. (2018) 175:37–46. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17010025

  • 3

    TatlıMCetinkayaOManerF. Evaluation of relationship between obsessive- compulsive disorder and dissociative experiences. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. (2018) 16:161–7. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.2.161

  • 4

    LochnerCSeedatSHemmingsSMKinnearCJCorfieldVANiehausDJet al. Dissociative experiences in obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania: clinical and genetic findings. Compr Psychiatry. (2004) 45:384–91. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.03.010

  • 5

    SideliLSantoroGFontanaAGuglielmucciFCarettiVSchimmentiA. The relationship between obsessive-compulsive symptoms and dissociation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Dissociation. (2023) 24:362–79. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2023.2181477

  • 6

    MöllmannAHungerASchulzCWilhelmSBuhlmannU. Gazing rituals in body dysmorphic disorder. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. (2020) :68:101522. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101522

  • 7

    DemartiniBNisticòVTedescoRMarzoratiAFerrucciRPrioriAet al. Visual perception and dissociation during Mirror Gazing Test in patients with anorexia nervosa: a preliminary study. Eat Weight Disord. (2021) 26:1541–51. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00977-6

  • 8

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder: DSM-5. Fifth edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association (2013).

  • 9

    GrantJEChamberlainSR. Trichotillomania. Am J Psychiatry. (2016) 173:868–74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111432

  • 10

    GrantJEOdlaugBLChamberlainSRKeuthenNJLochnerCSteinDJ. Skin picking disorder. Am J Psychiatry. (2012) 169:1143–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12040508

  • 11

    LochnerCSimeonDNiehausDJSteinDJ. Trichotillomania and skin- picking: a phenomenological comparison. Depress Anxiety. (2002) 15:83–6. doi: 10.1002/da.10034

  • 12

    ÖztenESayarGHEryılmazGKağanGIşıkSKaramustafalıoğluO. The relationship of psychological trauma with trichotillomania and skin picking. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2015) 11:1203–10. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S79554

  • 13

    ChamberlainSRGrantJE. Minnesota impulse disorders interview (MIDI): validation of a structured diagnostic clinical interview for impulse control disorders in an enriched community sample. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 265:279–83. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.006

  • 14

    MoritzSGallinatCWeidingerSBruhnsALionDSnorrasonIet al. The Generic BFRB Scale-8 (GBS-8): a transdiagnostic scale to measure the severity of body-focused repetitive behaviours. Behav Cogn Psychother. (2022) 50:620–8. doi: 10.1017/S1352465822000327

  • 15

    BernsteinEMPutnamFW. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis. (1986) 174:727–35. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004

  • 16

    van IjzendoornMHSchuengelC. The measurement of dissociation in normal and clinical populations: Meta-analytic validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Clin Psychol Rev. (1996) 16:365–82. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(96)00006-2

  • 17

    PaulTSchroeterKDahmeBNutzingerDO. Self-injurious behavior in women with eating disorders. Am J Psychiatry. (2002) 159:408–11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.408

  • 18

    BallSRobinsonAShekharAWalshK. Dissociative symptoms in panic disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. (1997) 185:755–60. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199712000-00006

  • 19

    GrantJEReddenSAMedeirosGCOdlaugBLCurleyEETavaresHet al. Trichotillomania and its clinical relationship to depression and anxiety. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. (2017) 21:302–6. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2017.1314509

Summary

Keywords

trichotillomania, skin picking disorder, transdiagnostic, dissociation, hair pulling

Citation

Crisp ZC and Grant JE (2025) Dissociation in skin picking disorder and trichotillomania. Front. Psychiatry 16:1490785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1490785

Received

03 September 2024

Accepted

14 March 2025

Published

03 April 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Benjamin Hummelen, Oslo University Hospital, Norway

Reviewed by

Luca Steardo, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Italy

Imen Baati, Hedi Chaker Hospital, Tunisia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jon E. Grant,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics