Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Psychological Therapy and Psychosomatics

This article is part of the Research TopicLong-Term Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Well-Being in Education: Underlying Mechanisms and Intervention StrategiesView all 12 articles

Advantages and disadvantages of online psychotherapy and decisions to use it in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic - analysis of mediation variables

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute of Psychology, University of Szczecin, Poland, Szczecin, Poland
  • 2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany, Rüdersdorf, Germany
  • 3Center for Mental Health, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany, Rüdersdorf, Germany
  • 4Lusófona University, HEI‐Lab: Digital Human‐Environment Interaction Labs, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, Coimbra, Portugal
  • 5University of Coimbra Health Services, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, Coimbra, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: In recent years, online psychotherapy has gained importance as a flexible, cost-effective and widely available alternative to face- to- face therapy. Existing research suggests that psychotherapists see both the advantages and potential limitations of this form of work. It can be assumed that the perceived advantages and disadvantages of online therapy constitute the primary direct factors influencing decisions to adopt this form. However, in the era of the pandemic, it seems important to assess to what extent emotional factors - such as fear of infection or pandemic-related fatigue - and institutional factors - such as perceived infection rates or trust in the official recommendations, mediate this relationship. Therefore, this study aimed to examine how cognitive evaluations, accompanying emotions, and institutional conditions influenced psychotherapists’ decisions to adopt remote practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: The study involved 283 psychotherapists from four European countries: Poland, Portugal, Germany and Sweden. An original interview created for the purposes of the study was used, to collect sociodemographic data related to the professional functioning of psychotherapists and aimed at learning about the advantages and disadvantages of online therapy in the opinion of psychotherapists. In addition, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Fear of Contracting COVID-19 Scale (FCS Covid-19), and the Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) were used. Results: The results showed that the vast majority of therapists recognized both advantages and disadvantages of online therapy. The analysis of the decision-making process showed no direct relationship between the perception of the advantages and disadvantages of online therapy and the decision to use it. Mediation analyses showed no indirect effects for advantages; for disadvantages, two institutional mediators operated in opposite directions (government recommendations: positive; society recommendations: negative), while emotional mediators were non-significant. This means that government recommendations and recommendations of psychotherapeutic societies mediate the relationship between perceived limitations and the decision to use online therapy. Discussion: The results obtained make a significant contribution to the understanding of the advantages and limitations of online therapy perceived by psychotherapists and the factors directly and indirectly related to the decision to use it.

Keywords: Online therapy, psychotherapists, cognitive factors, Psychological factors, epidemiological and institutional factors, Decisions, COVID-19

Received: 04 Aug 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Joanna, Rutkowska, Lane, Meixner, Marques and Martins. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Furmańska Joanna, furmanska-joanna@wp.pl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.