- 1Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
- 2Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at the University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan
- 3Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
- 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
Background: Depression is a major global public health issue. There is little available data regarding the association between the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and depression. The current study aimed to investigate the association between PPIs and depression among adults in Central Sudan.
Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted to examine adults in Central Sudan. Sociodemographic data and medical history were collected. Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Multivariate binary regression analyses, modified Poisson regression analyses, and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed.
Results: We enrolled 914 adults (317 [34.7%] men and 597 [65.3%] women). Participants’ median (interquartile range) age was 38.0 (27.0–52.0) years. Of the participants, 255 (27.9%) had used PPIs. In Poisson regression, after adjusting for confounders (age, sex, education, occupation, marital status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, smoking, alcohol), use of PPIs [adjusted relative risk = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21–1.40] was associated with a higher depression score. Of 914 adults, 155 (17.0%) had depression (PHQ-9 score of ≥ 8). Before matching (PSM), in multivariate binary regression (after removing confounders), PPIs were associated with depression [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)= 1.64; 95% CI = 1.14–2.37]. After matching, PPIs were associated with depression (AOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.13–2.41).
Conclusion: This study revealed a positive association between PPI use and depression. Longitudinal studies will be necessary to examine this relationship in more depth.
1 Introduction
Depression is a major public health issue affecting millions of people globally (1). Several sociodemographic factors, including age (2, 3), marital status (2), education (2), smoking (4), body mass index (BMI) (2), and presence of comorbidity (e.g., diabetes mellitus and hypertension) (2, 4) are associated with depression among adults. Although the precise etiology of depression has not yet been established, the condition is considered to have a complex and multifactorial etiology involving a range of factors, including genetic predispositions, psychosocial stressors, neurobiological imbalances, and lifestyle (5, 6).
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the primary therapeutic drugs for treating gastric acid-related diseases, including peptic ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease. PPIs are widely used and can be purchased over the counter without a prescription in several countries (7, 8). Although an adequate safety profile for PPIs has been established for several years, recent studies have reported that their use may be associated with the potential risk of depression (9–12). Few studies examining the association between PPI use and depression have been conducted in developing countries (9–12). Thus, further studies are needed to investigate this issue in other populations, including in sub-Saharan African countries, in which poor mental health has been reported (13). A prevalence rate of 18% for depression was reported among adults in Ethiopia (4). A recent study reported that 62% of internally displaced persons in Sudan had depression (3). Moreover, Central Sudan, like many regions in sub-Saharan Africa, faces unique health challenges in the presence of armed conflict, including a high burden of mental health disorders (14). However, specific research assessing the association between PPIs and depression in this setting is scarce. Thus, the current study aimed to examine the association between PPIs and depression among adults in Central Sudan.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design and setting
This community-based multistage survey was conducted in Elrikieb, East Gezira, in Central Sudan from April to June 2025. Elrikieb is a large village chosen because it comprises four sub-villages, whose inhabitants resemble those of the entire Gezira State. The “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines” were strictly followed (15).
2.2 Study population and sampling
The study population comprised men and women aged 18 years or older residing in the selected communities. Exclusion criteria were as follows: an inability to provide informed consent, severe cognitive impairment precluding reliable questionnaire completion, and those who would not ensure the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) primarily reflects depressive symptoms.
A multistage stratified random sampling approach was employed to select participants. Within each selected sub-village, households were randomly chosen.
2.3 Sample size calculation
A sample size of 914 participants was calculated based on the assumption that approximately 30% of adults would have depression. This assumption was based on the findings of a previous study in Northern Sudan, which reported that 39% of adults had depression-anxiety (16). Additionally, depending on the earlier reports on drugs used in Sudan (17), we assumed that approximately 30% of depressed adults would have used PPIs. In comparison, 20% of adults without depression would have used PPIs. An analysis with this sample size would have 80% power and an alpha level of 0.05 for statistical significance.
2.4 Data collection
After the participants provided written informed consent, data were collected by trained medical officers (two men and two women) through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire. The questionnaires included data on sociodemographic factors, such as age, sex, education level, marital status, employment status, smoking status, alcohol use, medical history, including diabetes mellitus and hypertension, as well as other medications used, including PPIs. In cases where patients reported a history of using PPIs, participants were asked to show the medical officer the tabs/cap to confirm their report. The participants’ weight and height were measured using the standard procedure, and their BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2).
Adults were considered to have hypertension if they were diagnosed with hypertension and using medications or had newly diagnosed hypertension, which is defined by systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg, or both. Adults were considered to have diabetes mellitus if they had already been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus.
2.5 Assessment of depression
The PHQ-9 was used to screen for depression. The PHQ-9 is a widely used, brief, and validated self-report tool for screening, diagnosing, and monitoring the severity of depression. Its utility in diverse cultural settings, including Arabic-speaking populations, has been established, making it a suitable tool for assessing depression in Sudan (18, 19). In this study, the Arabic validated version of the PHQ-9 consists of nine items, each scored from 0 to 3, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27 (20). Based on recent data, a score of ≥ 8 was used as the cut-off for clinically significant depression (21). Therefore, participants with a score of ≥ 8 were classified as having significant clinical depression necessitating further evaluation and management.
2.6 Data analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 24.0). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data distribution (age, BMI, and PHQ-9 scores), indicating that the data were non-normally distributed. The median (interquartile range) and number/frequency (percentage) were used to summarize the sociodemographic characteristics and PHQ-9 scores. The chi-square test was used to compare proportions between the two groups. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using modified Poisson regression (depression score as a continuous variable) and binary data (with depression as a categorical variable, No/Yes) as the dependent variable and sociodemographic variables (age, education, occupation, and family history of mental illness) and PPI use as independent variables. Adults were considered to have depression if the PHQ-9 score was ≥ 8. Variables with p-values < 0.2 in the univariate analysis (Poisson and binary) were included in the multivariate analysis, adjusting for potential confounders. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias by balancing the depression and non-depression groups using the “MatchIt” package in R. The package executes the function Matchit, using depression status as the dependent variable; the other variables (excluding PPI use) are covariates, including age, marital status, BMI, sex, educational level, occupation, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. The test was performed using the nearest-neighbor match method at a 1:4 ratio, with a caliber width of 0.03. Adjusted odds ratios, adjusted relative risk (ARR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
3 Results
3.1 General characteristics
We enrolled 914 adults (317 [34.7%] men and 597 [65.3%] women). Participants’ median (interquartile range) age and BMI were 38.0 (27.0–52.0) years and 21.6 (18.7–25.8) kg/m (2), respectively. Of the 914 participants, 238 (26.3%) had a secondary education level or higher, and 288 (31.5%) were employed. Additionally, 646 (78.2%) participants were married, 153 (16.7%) were smokers, 72 (7.9%) were alcoholics, 296 (32.4%) were hypertensive, and 78 (8.5%) had diabetes mellitus. Of the participants, 255 (27.9%) reported using PPIs (Table 1). Omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole were the most commonly used PPIs.
3.2 Factors associated with the depression score
In univariate Poisson regression, age, being female, education, occupation, marital status, hypertension, and use of PPIs were associated with depression score. Smoking, alcohol, diabetes mellitus, and BMI were not associated with depression score. After shifting the variables to a multivariate Poisson regression, age, being female, education, marital status, and use of PPIs were associated with depression score. Thus, after adjusting for confounders, PPI use (ARR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.21–1.40) was associated with depression score. Age (ARR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.993–0.998) and education (ARR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.82–0.95) were inversely associated with depression score. Being female (ARR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.13–1.42) and being unmarried/divorced (ARR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.04–1.20) were positively associated with depression score (Table 2, Figure 1).
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate modified Poisson regression analysis of factors associated with depression score among men in East Gezira, Sudan, 2025 (n = 914).
Figure 1. Love plot showing covariate balance between the covariates before (red points) and after (green points) propensity matching score in East Gezira, Sudan, 2025.
3.3 Factors associated with depression
The results revealed that 155 (17.0%) participants had depression. Before matching (PSM), there was a significantly higher number of adults who used PPIs among adults with depression compared with adults without depression [57/155(36.8% versus 198/759(26.1%), P = 0.008]. Age was significantly lower in adults with depression compared with adults without depression. In univariate analysis, age, being female, being married, having a lower level of education, occupation, and using PPIs were associated with depression. BMI, alcohol use, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were not associated with depression (Table 3). When variables with P < 0.20 were included in the multivariate binary regression, using PPIs was associated with depression, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.64 (95% CI, 1.14–2.37). Age was inversely associated with depression (AOR = 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97–0.99). Being unmarried/divorced (AOR = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.09–2.32) was associated with depression. Females, level of education, and occupation were not associated with depression in multivariate analysis (confounders), Table 4.
Table 3. Univariate binary analysis of factors (before matching) associated with depression in adults in East Gezira, Sudan, 2025 (n = 914).
Table 4. Multivariate binary analysis of factors (before and after matching) associated with depression among adults in Gezira State in Sudan, 2025 (n = 914).
The comparison between the variables before and after matching is shown in Table 5 (Figure 1). After marching, when the variables with P< 0.20 were shifted to the multivariate binary analysis, using PPIs was associated with depression, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.66 (95% CI, 1.13–2.41), Table 4.
Table 5. Comparing factors between adults with and without depression before and after matching in East Gezira, Sudan, 2025.
4 Discussion
The findings of the current study revealed that using PPI was associated with higher depression scores (30.0%, ARR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.21–1.40) and a greater odds ratio of depression (1.64, 95% CI = 1.14–2.37) before and after PSM. These findings are in accord with previous research conducted in other countries (10, 11, 22–24).
The United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 16,881 adults aged 20 years or older reported that PPI use was associated with depression (22). Laudisio et al. used the Geriatric Depression Scale in older patients (n = 344) aged > 57 years in Tuscania, Italy, and found that the use of PPIs was associated with a higher odds of depression (OR = 2.38; 95% CI = 1.02–5.5) (23). Huang et al. analyzed data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), revealing that the use of PPIs was associated with depression (24). In a study in Sweden of 29,320 children aged 7–17 years, Wang et al. found that the use of PPIs was associated with a higher risk of depression (10). Moreover, PPIs were examined as part of studies of a recently developed tool (magnesium depletion score) to assess magnesium deficiency, indicating an association between PPI use and depression (2, 25, 26).
Notably, in addition to an association between PPI use and depression, a previous study reported causal relationships between peptic ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux disease (which are indicators for PPI use), and depression (11). These findings should be considered when assessing the association between PPI use and depression.
However, because this study is cross-sectional, the observed relationship needs to be interpreted with caution because PPIs are typically prescribed for gastrointestinal disorders such as peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux, and these conditions themselves were reported to contribute to depressive symptoms through pain, chronic discomfort, sleep disturbance, and reduced quality of life. In our study, we did not collect data on specific gastrointestinal disorders (symptoms, severity, and complications). Therefore, we would not be able to adjust for this potential confounding factor. This means that the observed association may partly reflect the burden of gastrointestinal disease among PPI users rather than an independent effect of PPI use. Therefore, the findings of this relationship need to be considered as hypothesis-generating and may highlight a subgroup of adults with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms who also have a higher burden of depression and may benefit from additional gastrointestinal and mental health exploration. A larger longitudinal study, such as one that administers surveys before and after PPI use, may help examine these effects in more detail.
The precise mechanism of the association between PPIs and neuropathies/depression is unknown. However, a plausible explanation is that PPIs can lead to increased serum gastrin levels, which play a role in regulating and modifying aspects of behavior that can result in depression (27, 28). Moreover, increased gastrin levels can activate cholecystokinin type B receptors in the brain, leading to depression (29). PPIs cross the blood–brain barrier, thereby interfering with neuronal function or inducing vitamin B12 deficiency. PPIs can reduce B12 absorption by inhibiting gastric acid secretion, potentially leading to B12 deficiency. B12 deficiency can lead to an increased homocysteine level, facilitating tau hyperphosphorylation and amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition, which are associated with neuropathies and depression. Likewise, it has been postulated that PPIs can inhibit vacuolar ATPases, modulate microglial Aβ phagocytosis, and neurodegeneration (9).
4.1 Limitations of the study
The study is limited -e.g., collecting depression data from a single baseline, inability to track exact PPI usage, and lack of reporting of comorbid gastrointestinal diseases (e.g., stress ulcer, GERD) – there is not enough evidence to establish a conclusion. PPI users are likely to have gastrointestinal diseases, which can cause stress and depression.
5 Conclusion
The current study showed a positive association between PPIs and depression. Longitudinal studies will be necessary to examine this relationship in more depth.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at the University of Gadarif in Gadarif, Eastern Sudan (Ref. #2025, 04). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and adhered to good clinical research practices. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
AA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SI: Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. EA: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. IA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Acknowledgments
The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Qassim University for financial support (QU-APC-2025).
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Mental GBD and Collaborators D. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. (2022) 9:137–50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3
2. Zhao W and Jin H. Magnesium depletion score and depression: a positive correlation among US adults. Front Public Heal. (2024) 12:1486434. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1486434
3. Mohamed EH and Kheir DA. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression and associated factors among internally displaced persons in al-galgala, Sudan. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2024) 20:1155–68. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S462342
4. Molla GL, Sebhat HM, Hussen ZN, Mekonen AB, Mersha WF, and Yimer TM. Depression among Ethiopian adults: cross-sectional study. Psychiatry J. (2016) 2016:1468120. doi: 10.1155/2016/1468120
5. Winkins H. Understanding multifactorial etiology of major depres- sive disorder. J Neurol Disord. (2024) 12:130323. doi: 10.4172/2329-6895.12.2.594
6. Remes O, Francisco J, and Templeton P. Biological, psychological, and social determinants of depression: A review of recent literature. Brain Sci. (2021) 11:1633. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121633
7. Abrahami D, McDonald EG, Schnitzer M, and Azoulay L. Trends in prescribing patterns of proton pump inhibitors surrounding new guidelines. Ann Epidemiol. (2021) 55:24–6. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.12.002
8. de Araújo LML, de Moura Lopes MV, de Arruda RS, Martins RR, and Oliveira AG. Proton pump inhibitor and community pharmacies: Usage profile and factors associated with long-term use. PloS One. (2021) 16:e0252785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252785
9. Mohan M, Mannan A, Singh S, and Singh TG. Unlocking the cellular mystery: how proton pump inhibitors may alter the dementia landscape. Brain Res. (2025) 1861:149702. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149702
10. Wang YH, Wintzell V, Ludvigsson JF, Svanström H, and Pasternak B. Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of depression and anxiety in children: nationwide cohort study. Clin Transl Sci. (2022) 15:1112. doi: 10.1111/cts.13225
11. Zhan ZQ, Li JX, Zhang WG, Huang SY, and Fang X. Multidimensional assessment of psychiatric adverse events related to proton pump inhibitors: A real-world, pharmacovigilance study. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2025) 31:e70436. doi: 10.1111/cns.70436
12. Meshkat S, Lin Q, Tassone VK, Janssen-Aguilar R, Ym Pang H, Lou W, et al. Acid reflux medication use among adults with depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. (2025) 379:747–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.085
13. Gbadamosi IT, Henneh IT, Aluko OM, Yawson EO, Fokoua AR, Koomson A, et al. Depression in sub-saharan africa. IBRO Neurosci Rep. (2022) 12:309–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.03.005
14. Hassan IN, Abuassa N, and Ibrahim M. Childhood health and nutrition challenges in Sudan’s conflict zones. Lancet. (2024) 404:1193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01911-1
15. Checklists - STROBE. Available online at: https://www.strobe-statement.org/checklists/ (Accessed Dec 20, 2022).
16. Musa IR, Hassan AA, and Adam I. Multimorbidity and its associated risk factors among adults in northern Sudan: a community-based cross-sectional study. J Heal Popul Nutr. (2024) 43:13. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00513-7
17. Elamin MM, Mohamed AA, Mohamed ME, and Hamadalneel YB. Insights into stress ulcer prophylaxis among non-critically ill patients: a tertiary hospital perspective from Sudan. J Pharm Heal Care Sci. (2025) 11:71. doi: 10.1186/s40780-025-00483-w
18. Omar SM, Musa IR, Idrees MB, and Adam I. Prevalence of depression and associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in eastern Sudan. BMC Psychiatry. (2021) 21:336. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03357-1
19. Hassan AA, Idrees MB, Al-Nafeesah A, Alharbi HY, AlEed A, and Adam I. Depression and anxiety among adolescents in northern Sudan: A school-based cross-sectional study. Med. (2025) 61:228. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020228
20. Becker S, Al Zaid K, and Al Faris E. Screening for somatization and depression in Saudi Arabia: A validation study of the PHQ in primary care. Int J Psychiatry Med. (2002) 32:271–83. doi: 10.2190/XTDD-8L18-P9E0-JYRV
21. Levis B, Bhandari PM, Neupane D, Fan S, Sun Y, He C, et al. Data-driven cutoff selection for the patient health questionnaire-9 depression screening tool. JAMA Netw Open. (2024) 7:e2429630. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29630
22. Fong P, Chan ST, Lei PN, Cheong HI, Cheong IM, and Hoe WL. Association of suicidal ideation and depression with the use of proton pump inhibitors in adults: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:19539. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24244-z
23. Laudisio A, Antonelli Incalzi R, Gemma A, Gemma A, Giovannini S, Lo Monaco MR, et al. Use of proton-pump inhibitors is associated with depression: A population-based study. Int Psychogeriatrics. (2018) 30:153–9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001715
24. Huang WS, Bai YM, Hsu JW, Huang KL, Tsai CF, Su TP, et al. Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of major depressive disorder: A nationwide population-based study. Psychother Psychosom. (2018) 87:62–4. doi: 10.1159/000485190
25. Cai Z, She J, Liu X, Li R, Guo S, Han Z, et al. Associations between magnesium depletion score and depression among individuals aged 20 to 60 years. J Trace Elem Med Biol. (2024) 86:127543. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127543
26. Lu J, Deng Z, Cui W, Shang X, Jiang S, Wang S, et al. A medication-driven magnesium deficiency score is associated with increased depressive symptoms prevalence independent of renal function: Evidence from NHANES 1999–2018. J Affect Disord. (2025) 390:119801. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119801
27. Ali SB, Mahmood K, Saeed R, Salman T, Choudhary MI, and Haleem DJ. Elevated anxiety, hypoactivity, memory deficits, decreases of brain serotonin and 5-HT-1A receptors expression in rats treated with omeprazole. Toxicol Res. (2021) 37:237–48. doi: 10.1007/s43188-020-00060-3
28. Ali SB, Saeed R, Mahmood K, and Haleem DJ. Omeprazole affects the expression of serotonin-1A in the brain regions and alleviates anxiety in rat model of immobilization-induced stress. Behav Pharmacol. (2024) 35:408–17. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000793
Keywords: adult, age, depression, patient health questionnaire-9, proton pump inhibitors
Citation: Alwabili AA, Omar SM, Alotaibi EA and Adam I (2026) Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of depression among Sudanese adults: a cross-sectional community-based study. Front. Psychiatry 16:1689599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1689599
Received: 20 August 2025; Accepted: 30 November 2025; Revised: 27 November 2025;
Published: 02 January 2026.
Edited by:
Md. Golam Sharoar, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, United StatesReviewed by:
Md Imamul Islam, University of Manitoba, CanadaJohn Zhou, Yale University, United States
Copyright © 2026 Alwabili, Omar, Alotaibi and Adam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Afnan A. Alwabili, YS5hbHdhYmlsaUBxdS5lZHUuc2E=