ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Domains Positive Valence System, Negative Valence System, Cognitive Systems, and Social Processes and their Relationship With Stress, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms in a University Student Sample
Provisionally accepted- 1Social and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- 2German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Berlin/Potsdam, Germany, Berlin/Potsdam, Germany
- 3Academic Sports Center, Student Health Management, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- 4Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Ruppin-Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany., Neuruppin, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent among university students. The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework seeks to improve diagnosis, treatment, and prevention by providing a comprehensive framework for understanding mental health and illness. We report the prevalence of stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in a student sample and investigate their relationship with the RDoC domains positive valence system (PVS), negative valence system (NVS), cognitive systems (CS), and social processes (SP). Differences by faculty affiliation are also explored. Methods: 184 university students (mean age 24.5 ± 5.9 years, 73.4% female) participated in an online survey. RDoC domain scores were determined using a confirmatory factor analysis. Stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Multiple linear regressions (MLR) were conducted to examine RDoC domain factor scores as predictors of stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Additional MLR analyses examined faculty affiliation as a predictor. Results: 30% of the participants (stress 28.8%, anxiety 31.0%, depressive symptoms 30.4%) showed an elevated symptom burden. NVS-and CS-scores were positively associated with stress (b = 3.417, p < 0.001, b = 1.412, p = 0.001), anxiety (b = 2.735, p < 0.001, b = 0.994, p = 0.003), and depressive symptoms (b = 1.519, p = 0.004, b = 1.000, p = 0.012). PVS-and SP-scores were negatively associated with depressive symptoms (b = -1.306, p = 0.006, b = -2.050, p = 0.001). No differences by faculty affiliation were found. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate a notable mental health burden in university students. We found associations between RDoC domains and all three mental health outcomes. Depressive symptoms were associated with all assessed RDoC domains. Anxiety and stress were linked to NVS-and CS-scores. Mental burden was therefore predominantly associated with heightened negative affect, anxiety, and subjectively perceived impaired cognitive performance. Depressive symptom burden was additionally associated with reduced positive affect and impaired social behavior and interaction. No faculty-specific burden was observed. The study contributes to understanding university students' mental health burden and represents a further step in conceptualizing stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms based on the RDoC framework in a non-clinical sample.
Keywords: Cognitive Systems, Faculty, Negative valence system, Positive valence system, RDoC, Research Domain Criteria, Social processes, Student mental health
Received: 28 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Esipova, Tschorn, Böttger, Seiffert, Förstner, Seegert, Rapp and Koller-Schlaud. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mira Tschorn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
