ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
International perspectives on system change
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 2Emerging Minds, Stepney, Australia
- 3Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia
- 4Nordlandsforskning, Bodø, Norway
- 5Queen's University Belfast Faculty of Medicine Health and Life Sciences, Belfast, United Kingdom
- 6Nordlandssykehuset Bodo, Bodø, Norway
- 7Akershus Universitetssykehus HF, Lørenskog, Norway
- 8Universitetet i Sorost-Norge Biblioteket Drammen, Drammen, Norway
- 9The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 10Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission, Boston, United States
- 11Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Waltham, United States
- 12De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
- 13Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- 14Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- 15The Willoughby Clinic,, Willoughby, Australia
- 16Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Jerusalem, Israel
- 17Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Parental mental illness is a major public health issue across the globe with well-known intergenerational impacts on children. There is a wide body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of a range of interventions supporting families, however, their implementation has rarely been sustained across public health systems. Systemic change is an important part of workforce development and known to be crucial to embed and sustain practice, policy and structural initiatives in services for families. While much is known about the barriers to implementing family focused approaches within organisations and systems, less is known about how systems change occurs and what supports systems change to improve outcomes for families. This study uses a Delphi method, with 103 experts from 17 countries participating to identify systems change factors from their own experience and to build consensus about key strategies required across the globe to support systems change in health, education, social welfare and mental health services. The findings identify that systems change can be defined as any workforce, policy, legislation or other mental health promotion strategy that collectively contributes to improving outcomes for parents with mental illness, their children and their families. A systems approach to improve outcomes for families where a parent has a mental illness requires partnerships and collaboration between services and sectors affecting families (mental health, welfare, primary health, education, social care, public health), social and health policy development, and families themselves. Success in system change requires a focus on change at all levels of the system for momentum building, leadership support, the use of relevant data and reporting mechanisms, establishing practice competency and collaborative care, and being able to reflect and adapt to changing conditions and structural barriers. A focus on system change for supporting families where a parent has a mental illness appears to require the combination of many strategies and factors, with international approaches to knowledge sharing imperative to support implementing, resourcing and sustaining change.
Keywords: child mental health, Delphi study, Family focused practice, implementation science (MeSH), Parenting (MeSH), System change, Systems of care, workforce development
Received: 15 Sep 2025; Accepted: 02 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Goodyear, Allchin, Skogvy, Grant, Stavnes, Weimand, Isobel, Biebel, Nicholson, Yates, Hine, Gatsou, Soderblom, Doesum, Falkov, Shor, Collins, Hosman and Laletas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Melinda Jane Goodyear
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
