Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Perinatal Psychiatry

This article is part of the Research TopicPerinatal Bereavement, Trauma, & LossView all 9 articles

Lived experiences and coping mechanisms of parents following stillbirth and immediate postnatal death: An interpretative phenomenological study from a North Indian setting

Provisionally accepted
Sonia  Maurya1Sonia Maurya11Krishna  Kant YadavKrishna Kant Yadav1Pranay  VatsPranay Vats1Krati  DixitKrati Dixit1Moammar  HashmiMoammar Hashmi1Shruti  BishtShruti Bisht1Reema  MukherjeeReema Mukherjee2Sarmila  MazumderSarmila Mazumder1Barsha  Gadapani PathakBarsha Gadapani Pathak1,3*
  • 1Society for Applied Studies, Kolkata, India
  • 2Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
  • 3Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Perinatal bereavement represents a profound rupture in parental expectations, often leaving families in an extended search for closure. While there is substantial research that highlight grief following perinatal loss, understanding how parents cope with such loss is essential for developing sensitive and contextually relevant bereavement care. Methods This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of parents who had gone through perinatal loss within six months prior to data collection. Conducted during the formative and early implementation phase (Phase I and II) of the ongoing Strategies to Help in Optimal Pregnancy Outcomes and Reduce Stillbirths in India (SHRiSTI) project, between January and August 2025, in the Palwal district of North India. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with 15 bereaved parents, including both mothers and fathers. Using thematic analysis followed by Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis on selected narrativesUsing Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approachand thematic analysis, the insights into their emotional, social, and cultural experiences of grief and coping. The COREQ checklist was used to ensure comprehensive reporting. Results Four main themes emerged: parents' responses, amplifiers of grief, coping mechanisms, and search for closure. Immediate reactions included fainting, shock, and planning legal action, while long-term responses involved sadness, loneliness, sleeplessness, and persistent thoughts of the child. Grief showed gendered patterns. Mothers expressed emotions openly, whereas fathers often internalized them. Delayed or inadequate care, unclear communication, and disrespectful treatment by providers, along with delayed disclosure, intrusive questioning, and stigmatization at family and community levels, further intensified grief. Coping strategies included memory-making, withholding memories; and digital remembrance emerged as a contemporary form of memorialization. Most parents struggled to find closure. Conclusion Coping with perinatal loss is a negotiated and context-dependent process rather than a uniform trajectory toward closure. The study emphasizes the need for context specific and culturally sensitive bereavement care within maternal and newborn health services.

Keywords: Bereavement care, Immediate postnatal death, India, interpretative phenomenological analysis, LMICs, meaning-making, parental coping, perinatal loss

Received: 31 Oct 2025; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Maurya1, Yadav, Vats, Dixit, Hashmi, Bisht, Mukherjee, Mazumder and Gadapani Pathak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Barsha Gadapani Pathak

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.