Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Psychopathology

Moral injury in modern warfare: clinical reflections and implications for military psychiatry

Provisionally accepted
  • Jerusalem Mental Health Center, Jerusalem, Israel

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Moral injury has emerged as a significant dimension of psychological suffering among individuals exposed to ethically compromising situations in war. Unlike post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is primarily organized around fear-based responses to threat, moral injury centers on violations of deeply held moral expectations involving responsibility, agency, and trust. In this clinical reflection, moral injury is approached not as a psychiatric diagnosis, but as a clinical–moral condition arising from difficulty reconciling actions or survival with an internalized moral framework. Drawing on theoretical models and clinical experience in military psychiatry, the manuscript examines how features of modern warfare—including asymmetrical conflict, technological mediation, blurred civilian–combatant boundaries, and fragmented chains of responsibility—shape moral injury and complicate processes of moral repair. These conditions do not create moral injury de novo, but alter how moral responsibility is experienced, narrated, and addressed within military systems. The paper explores the implications of moral injury for military psychiatry and military organizations, highlighting the interface between individual moral suffering and institutional responsibility. It raises questions about how military systems recognize, legitimize, or remain ambivalent toward moral injury, particularly when contrasted with the more established status of PTSD as an honorable cost of service. Attention is given to the limits of symptom-focused interventions when confronted with moral suffering grounded in intact values, and to the need for clinical and organizational frameworks that support moral acknowledgment and repair. The manuscript situates moral injury within broader professional and societal contexts, emphasizing its relevance for psychiatry in contemporary armed conflict.

Keywords: Ethical conflict, institutional responsibility, Military Psychiatry, Modern warfare, moral injury

Received: 18 Nov 2025; Accepted: 28 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Braun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dotan Braun

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.