PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Psychopathology

Scaling Injustice: Epistemic Harm in DID and What Clinical Records Will Teach AI

  • 1. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States

  • 2. McLean Hospital, Belmont, United States

Article metrics

View details

15

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) remains one of psychiatry's most doubted diagnoses, where patients' accounts are dismissed and their experiences forced into ill-fitting diagnostic categories. This article examines how testimonial and hermeneutical injustices manifest in clinical practice, from skepticism about the disorder's validity to documentation that renders patients' trauma histories incoherent. These failures delay accurate diagnosis, erode therapeutic alliances, and create clinical records that now train artificial intelligence systems. As AI tools increasingly shape psychiatric decision-making, we face an urgent reality: if clinicians cannot recognize or document complex trauma accurately, automated systems will scale these failures exponentially. Drawing on DID research and epistemic justice frameworks, I argue for immediate reforms in clinical documentation, psychiatric training, and data governance to prevent algorithmic amplification of longstanding harms.

Summary

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Clinical documentation, Diagnostic bias, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Electronic Health Records, Epistemic injustice and psychiatry, Trauma-informed care

Received

29 January 2026

Accepted

16 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Akinlade. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Oluwafunmilayo Akinlade

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics