Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Digital Mental Health

Qualitative content analysis of reactivity effects and feasibility of ecological momentary assessments of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors in the long-term and in suicidal crises

Provisionally accepted
Lena  SpangenbergLena Spangenberg1*Cora  SpahnCora Spahn1Jana  SerebriakovaJana Serebriakova2Thomas  ForkmannThomas Forkmann2Heide  GlaesmerHeide Glaesmer1
  • 1Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Universitat Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: This study explored participant experiences with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in the context of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Methods: 16 participants of a long-term EMA study (with varying STB occurrence during the study and low vs. high compliance) were interviewed on reactivity effects and feasibility of EMA. Qualitative content analysis was performed using an inductive-deductive approach and consensual coding. Results: Reactivity to EMA was reported by some participants, with suicidal thoughts occasionally intensifying/being triggered by survey prompts. Importantly, no evidence indicated that EMA triggered suicidal actions. However, the burden increased over time for some, calling for more personalized monitoring durations. EMA's feasibility during acute suicidal crises was questioned due to reduced ability and willingness to respond. Conclusions: Long-term EMA monitoring after psychiatric discharge was perceived as feasible and beneficial. Selection bias and the lack of quantitative validation limit generalizability. Findings underscore the value of mixed-methods approaches and participatory protocol design.

Keywords: Ecological Momentary Assessment, feasibility, Qualitative content analysis, reactivity, suicide-related thoughts and behaviors

Received: 12 Nov 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Spangenberg, Spahn, Serebriakova, Forkmann and Glaesmer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lena Spangenberg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.