COMMUNITY CASE STUDY article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
Innovating Military Suicide Prevention: Learnings from the Australian Defence SafeSide Project
Kylie Druett 1
Sarah Donovan 2
Jennifer Harvey 1
Dan Mobbs 2
Annamarie Bailey 2,3
Melanie Clark 2
Anthony Pisani 2,4,3
1. Mental Health and Wellbeing Branch, Australian Government Department of Defence, Canberra, Australia
2. SafeSide Prevention LLC, Rochester, United States
3. University of Rochester Medical Center Department of Psychiatry, Rochester, United States
4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Military suicide remains an urgent global concern, with Service members facing unique stressors including frequent relocations, postings to remote and regional locations where there is a lack of external facilities, reduced social connections, extended family separations, and operational demands that heighten psychological strain. In 2021, the Australian Department of Defence (Defence) partnered with SafeSide Prevention to enhance its Suicide Prevention Program through implementation of evidence-based best practices in suicide prevention. This Community Case Study describes the rationale, implementation, and early outcomes of the Defence SafeSide Project, which aimed to embed a contemporary clinical framework and develop a system-wide approach to modernising policy, practice, and workforce education across the organisation. The partnership implemented the SafeSide Framework for Suicide Prevention, adapting it as the CARE Model (Connect, Assess, Respond, Extend) for Defence contexts. This prevention-oriented approach tailors support to each member's circumstances through collaborative risk formulation rather than stratified risk categorisation. Major achievements included revising health and military personnel policies to remove "low", "medium", and "high" risk classifications, developing role-specific customised trainings, and integrating lived experience perspectives throughout implementation. Between August 2024, when the training roll out commenced, and August 2025, the national Defence workforce completed the following courses: Defence Suicide Awareness annual training (approximately 72,050 completions), CARE-Leaders and Managers (approximately 19,250 completions), CARE-Risk Formulation (approximately 1,010 completions), and CARE-Support (approximately 1600 completions). The project demonstrates how synchronised changes in policy, systems, and training can propel cultural transformation in military suicide prevention. Key lessons learned include the importance of collaborative governance structures, integration of lived experience voices, and addressing challenges in shifting from risk stratification to member-centred safety planning. While implementation is ongoing, preliminary outcomes suggest successful adoption of a prevention-oriented approach that extends suicide prevention beyond mental health settings to become a whole-of-Defence responsibility.
Summary
Keywords
implementation science, military suicide prevention, risk formulation, Safety planning, systems approach, Workforce education
Received
29 November 2025
Accepted
17 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Druett, Donovan, Harvey, Mobbs, Bailey, Clark and Pisani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Annamarie Bailey
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.