You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

COMMUNITY CASE STUDY article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Public Mental Health

Innovating Military Suicide Prevention: Learnings from the Australian Defence SafeSide Project

  • 1. Mental Health and Wellbeing Branch, Australian Government Department of Defence, Canberra, Australia

  • 2. SafeSide Prevention LLC, Rochester, United States

  • 3. University of Rochester Medical Center Department of Psychiatry, Rochester, United States

  • 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Military suicide remains an urgent global concern, with Service members facing unique stressors including frequent relocations, postings to remote and regional locations where there is a lack of external facilities, reduced social connections, extended family separations, and operational demands that heighten psychological strain. In 2021, the Australian Department of Defence (Defence) partnered with SafeSide Prevention to enhance its Suicide Prevention Program through implementation of evidence-based best practices in suicide prevention. This Community Case Study describes the rationale, implementation, and early outcomes of the Defence SafeSide Project, which aimed to embed a contemporary clinical framework and develop a system-wide approach to modernising policy, practice, and workforce education across the organisation. The partnership implemented the SafeSide Framework for Suicide Prevention, adapting it as the CARE Model (Connect, Assess, Respond, Extend) for Defence contexts. This prevention-oriented approach tailors support to each member's circumstances through collaborative risk formulation rather than stratified risk categorisation. Major achievements included revising health and military personnel policies to remove "low", "medium", and "high" risk classifications, developing role-specific customised trainings, and integrating lived experience perspectives throughout implementation. Between August 2024, when the training roll out commenced, and August 2025, the national Defence workforce completed the following courses: Defence Suicide Awareness annual training (approximately 72,050 completions), CARE-Leaders and Managers (approximately 19,250 completions), CARE-Risk Formulation (approximately 1,010 completions), and CARE-Support (approximately 1600 completions). The project demonstrates how synchronised changes in policy, systems, and training can propel cultural transformation in military suicide prevention. Key lessons learned include the importance of collaborative governance structures, integration of lived experience voices, and addressing challenges in shifting from risk stratification to member-centred safety planning. While implementation is ongoing, preliminary outcomes suggest successful adoption of a prevention-oriented approach that extends suicide prevention beyond mental health settings to become a whole-of-Defence responsibility.

Summary

Keywords

implementation science, military suicide prevention, risk formulation, Safety planning, systems approach, Workforce education

Received

29 November 2025

Accepted

17 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Druett, Donovan, Harvey, Mobbs, Bailey, Clark and Pisani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Annamarie Bailey

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics