Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Addictive Disorders

Outpatient psychotherapeutic treatment of Gambling Disorder — Lessons learned from Bavaria

Provisionally accepted
Bianca  PitzschelBianca Pitzschel1,2*Rebekka  RedelRebekka Redel3Martin  TauscherMartin Tauscher3Gabriele  KollerGabriele Koller2Elena  Gomes de MatosElena Gomes de Matos1,4Eva  HochEva Hoch1,2,4Larissa  SchwarzkopfLarissa Schwarzkopf1,5,6
  • 1Institut für Therapieforschung (IFT), Mental Health & Addiction Research, München, Germany
  • 2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • 3Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (BASHIP), Munich, Germany
  • 4Charlotte Fresenius University, Munich, Germany
  • 5Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology – IBE, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
  • 6Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Background Psychotherapeutic interventions are an effective treatment for gambling disorder (GD), yet little is known about their uptake in routine care settings. Using data from the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, this study estimates the proportion of patients with disordered gambling behavior receiving psychotherapy, describes their diagnostic characteristics, and outlines treatment patterns. Methods Adults insured by SHI in Bavaria with a confirmed GD diagnosis (ICD-10: F63.0 G) according to the M2Q criterion (i.e., diagnosis in ≥ 2 out of 4 quarters) who received outpatient care between January 2021 and March 2022 were included. Patients were divided into three groups, comprised of patients with (1) at least one billable encounter with a psychotherapist (PT), (2) at least one billable encounter with a neurologist or psychiatrist but none with a PT, and (3) no billable encounters with either. Groups were compared by age, sex, diagnosed comorbid mental disorders, and service utilization. Key elements of psychotherapy were also analyzed. Results Of 3,154 patients with disordered gambling behavior, 589 (18.6%) received psychotherapy. This group was younger (M = 39.7 years, SD = 12.8) than group 2 (M = 44.9 years, SD = 13.8) and group 3 (M = 43.8 years, SD = 14.1) and included a higher proportion of women than group 3 (18.5% vs. 12.4%). Comorbid depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorders were more frequent among patients in psychotherapy. Compared to group 3, they received services from internists, organ-specific specialists, and technical specialists more often. Compared to group 2, they more often used psychiatrists' services. Psychotherapy was most commonly individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and lasted 352 days on average, with about 18 sessions per patient. Conclusion Patients with disordered gambling behavior (according to ICD-10 criteria for F63.0) who receive psychotherapy often have additional mental disorders and higher overall care needs. This highlights the importance of integrated treatment approaches. The frequent use of CBT aligns with evidence-based practice and suggests potentially favorable therapeutic outcomes.

Keywords: characterization help-seeking gamblers, comorbidities, gambling disorder, Medical usage, Outpatient psychotherapy, outpatient treatment, Problematic gambling, psychotherapist care

Received: 04 Dec 2025; Accepted: 23 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Pitzschel, Redel, Tauscher, Koller, Gomes de Matos, Hoch and Schwarzkopf. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bianca Pitzschel

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.