STUDY PROTOCOL article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
This article is part of the Research TopicRestrictive Practices, Stigma, and Health Inequalities for Women with Mental Health Problems, Learning Disabilities, Autism, and Other Psychosocial DisabilitiesView all 5 articles
Praxeological Analysis (PA/CPA) for Stigma, Health Inequalities, and Coercion in Women's Services A Methods/Protocol Paper
Provisionally accepted- 1Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
- 2The King's Fund, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This paper sets out a practical, interview-free protocol for studying how stigma, inequalities, and restrictive practices are done in women's mental health, learning-disability, and autism services, with a particular focus on women detained in inpatient and other institutional settings. Building on Praxeological Analysis (PA) and Critical Praxeological Analysis (CPA), we specify data pathways for naturally occurring materials (clinical letters, triage logs, ward round notes, safeguarding records, complaint correspondence, public hearings/transcripts, and, where ethically approved, audio/video recordings of clinical interactions between people who use services and healthcare professionals), and a replicable analytic procedure keyed to linguistic/praxeological Gestalts. Rather than treating "stigma" as an attitude, attribute or variable, we investigate stigma in its sites of production, the situations in which discrimination, discreditation, degradation etc are done, experienced and witnessable. The protocol operationalises what we call a praxeological respecification: a shift from traits to scenes and from beliefs and attitudes to practices, enabling research and quality improvement that directly addresses the levers through which inequalities are produced and maintained and which supports least-restrictive, trauma-informed, autism-informed and culturally competent inpatient care in line with current NHS culture-of-care standards.
Keywords: audio/video recordings, Autism services, autism-informed, beliefs and attitudes to practices, Clinical interactions, Clinical letters, Coercion, complaint correspondence
Received: 11 Dec 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Hutchinson and Chikwira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Phil Hutchinson
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.