Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Public Mental Health

This article is part of the Research TopicRestrictive Practices, Stigma, and Health Inequalities for Women with Mental Health Problems, Learning Disabilities, Autism, and Other Psychosocial DisabilitiesView all 5 articles

Praxeological Analysis (PA/CPA) for Stigma, Health Inequalities, and Coercion in Women's Services A Methods/Protocol Paper

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 2The King's Fund, London, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This paper sets out a practical, interview-free protocol for studying how stigma, inequalities, and restrictive practices are done in women's mental health, learning-disability, and autism services, with a particular focus on women detained in inpatient and other institutional settings. Building on Praxeological Analysis (PA) and Critical Praxeological Analysis (CPA), we specify data pathways for naturally occurring materials (clinical letters, triage logs, ward round notes, safeguarding records, complaint correspondence, public hearings/transcripts, and, where ethically approved, audio/video recordings of clinical interactions between people who use services and healthcare professionals), and a replicable analytic procedure keyed to linguistic/praxeological Gestalts. Rather than treating "stigma" as an attitude, attribute or variable, we investigate stigma in its sites of production, the situations in which discrimination, discreditation, degradation etc are done, experienced and witnessable. The protocol operationalises what we call a praxeological respecification: a shift from traits to scenes and from beliefs and attitudes to practices, enabling research and quality improvement that directly addresses the levers through which inequalities are produced and maintained and which supports least-restrictive, trauma-informed, autism-informed and culturally competent inpatient care in line with current NHS culture-of-care standards.

Keywords: audio/video recordings, Autism services, autism-informed, beliefs and attitudes to practices, Clinical interactions, Clinical letters, Coercion, complaint correspondence

Received: 11 Dec 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Hutchinson and Chikwira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Phil Hutchinson

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.