ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Psychological Therapy and Psychosomatics
Childhood Exposure to Interpersonal and Animal-Directed Violence: Adversity Profiles and Adult Suicidality
Shelby Elaine McDonald 1
Camie A. Tomlinson 2
Stacey Freedenthal 3
Charlotte L. Bright 1
Amelia Malone 1
Nicole Nicotera 3
Lori R Kogan 1
Hannah Van Buiten 4
Jada K Ford 1
1. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States
2. University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
3. University of Denver, Denver, United States
4. Independent Researcher, Kailua, HI, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Background: Exposure to animal-directed violence is an overlooked aspect of childhood adversity that frequently co-occurs with interpersonal violence and may indicate heightened developmental risk. The existence and implications of this co-occurrence for adult suicidality have not been investigated. To address this gap, we compared suicidality across empirically derived adversity profiles that varied in childhood exposure to interpersonal and animal-directed violence. Method: Data were drawn from 1,072 adults who completed the Pets, Attachment, and Mental Health Study through Prolific. Threat-based adverse childhood experiences were assessed using items from the WHO ACE-IQ, and childhood exposure to animal cruelty was assessed using items adapted from the Pet Treatment Survey. Latent class analyses identified three adversity profiles: Low Adversity, Exposure to Interpersonal Violence Only, and Exposure to Both Interpersonal Violence and Animal Cruelty. Suicidal ideation was measured using the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation and the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale. Lifetime suicide attempt was assessed using a dichotomous item. Psychological distress, social support, and sociodemographic variables were included as covariates. Group differences were examined using the Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars method in Mplus. Results: Adults in the Interpersonal Violence and Animal Cruelty class reported higher intensity of recent suicidal ideation and greater odds of a lifetime suicide attempt compared with the Low Adversity and Interpersonal Violence Only classes. There were no differences between the Low Adversity and Interpersonal Violence Only classes on any suicidality outcome. Relative to heterosexual adults and cisgender men, sexual and gender minority adults were more likely to be classified in the Interpersonal Violence and Animal Cruelty class; similarly, relative to White participants, Black participants were more likely to be classified in this class. Conclusion: Co-occurring exposure to interpersonal violence and animal-directed violence in childhood is associated with elevated adult suicidality. These results identify animal cruelty exposure as a meaningful component of threat-based adversity and support its inclusion in trauma history interviews and suicide risk assessments.
Summary
Keywords
Animal cruelty, Childhood Adversity, interpersonal violence, latent class analysis, psychological distress, suicide attempt, suicide ideation
Received
19 December 2025
Accepted
16 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 McDonald, Tomlinson, Freedenthal, Bright, Malone, Nicotera, Kogan, Van Buiten and Ford. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shelby Elaine McDonald
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.