Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Personality Disorders

This article is part of the Research TopicPersonality Functioning Impairment: Early Signs, Risk Factors and Assessment From Childhood to Young AdulthoodView all articles

Parent-child Discrepancies in Reports of Pre-and Early Adolescent Level of Personality Functioning

Provisionally accepted
Kiran  BooneKiran Boone1Jessica  LaRoccaJessica LaRocca1Kennedy  M BalzenKennedy M Balzen1Carla  SharpCarla Sharp1Dara  E BabinskiDara E Babinski2*
  • 1University of Houston, Houston, United States
  • 2Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Given the research consensus that personality disorder often onsets in adolescence, more work is needed to investigate parent-child discrepancies in reporting on personality disorder, particularly during the pre- and early adolescent period when more significant impairment in personality functioning may be developing or can already be observed. The current study examined concordance of parent- and child-reported level of personality functioning (LPF, as defined in the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders) among pre- and early adolescents and examined the extent to which this concordance was associated with clinically relevant outcomes. Participants included N = 432 children between the ages of 10 and 15 years from three samples oversampled for psychopathology symptoms and their parents. Children and their parents reported on child impairment in personality functioning with the Level of Personality Functioning Scale Brief Form 2.0. Outcomes included parent-reported caregiver strain, parent-reported child functional impairment, and child-reported history of thoughts and behaviors related to suicide and non-suicidal self-injury. Latent profile analysis was conducted to identify profiles of children based on patterns of convergence and divergence between parent- and child-reported LPF. Profile membership was then used to predict outcomes. A four-profile model, with two parent-child convergent and two parent-child divergent profiles, demonstrated the best fit. Convergence on high impairment in LPF demonstrated the strongest associations with outcomes. Divergent profiles also demonstrated stronger associations with outcomes reported by the informant who had endorsed higher impairment in LPF. Findings suggested that both parent- and child-reported LPF, and the degree of their concordance, may have unique value for predicting clinically important outcomes in pre- and early adolescence. Research and clinical practice utilizing new dimensional approaches with adolescents may therefore benefit from multi-informant assessment of personality functioning.

Keywords: alternative model for personality disorders, early adolescence, Informant discrepancy, Level of personality functioning, personality disorder, Pre-adolescence

Received: 22 Dec 2025; Accepted: 12 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Boone, LaRocca, Balzen, Sharp and Babinski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dara E Babinski

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.