STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Computational Psychiatry

Protocol for a Randomized Trial to Predict the Efficacy of Cognitive and Behavioral Interventions for Symptoms of Depression

  • 1. Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States

  • 2. Princeton University Department of Psychology, Princeton, United States

  • 3. Geha Mental Health Centre, Petah Tikva, Israel

  • 4. Tel Aviv University Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel

  • 5. University of College London, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Introduction Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most common interventions for depression and has two key components: Cognitive Restructuring (CR) and Behavioral Activation (BA). However, no evidence-based guidelines exist to help clients and clinicians decide whether CBT would be a good first-line treatment for a given individual based on their personal characteristics, and which CBT intervention would benefit them more. We propose that specific capacities to learn from new information and experiences are prerequisites for response to CBT and that BA and CR require different learning capacities. In this study, we aim to develop predictive models of symptom change based on computationally-derived variables from behavioral tasks, in addition to clinical and demographic self-report data, to identify parameters and variables that can determine which individuals with depressive symptoms would benefit from CBT-based interventions and, ideally, which specific interventions they would benefit from more. Methods and analysis We plan to recruit at least 1,500 adult participants who report having symptoms of depression and reside in USA. After completing a series of questionnaire and behavioral tasks to assess their learning propensities, participants will be randomly assigned to a BA or a CR group. Using an online self-help tool, participants will then engage with designated modules according to their assigned group for five weeks. We will assess symptoms 1 week post-intervention (main end point of study) and follow up at 6, 18, and 42 weeks post-intervention. Upon enrolling and consenting into the main study, participants will be randomly assigned to either the training dataset or the held-out test dataset at a ratio of 2:1. This enables a clean separation of training and test datasets and prevent data leakage. We plan to build cross-validated predictive algorithms on the training dataset, and preregister our analysis plan before we validate our models and hypotheses in the held-out, unseen, test dataset. The first enrollment of the study started 23rd January, 2024. This trial was registered during the enrollment phase at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06631183.

Summary

Keywords

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), Depression, Prediction model, Psychotherapy, Randomized Clinical Trial

Received

24 December 2025

Accepted

20 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Ding, Chiu, Moon, Ren, Turner, Shoval, Niv and Berwian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Isabel Berwian

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics