PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Schizophrenia
Grounding Psychosis Research: Why Observable Signs Should Anchor Biological Investigations
Provisionally accepted
- McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Biological psychiatry faces a significant epistemic challenge in identifying valid objects for mechanistic research. Both diagnostic constructs and individual symptoms are abstract symbols defined circularly within a closed hermeneutic system, creating a symbol grounding problem that hinders the discovery of biophysical substrates (biomarkers). I argue that progress requires an epistemological separation between the ungrounded symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations, which are co-constructed through personal and clinical interpretation from grounded signs that are directly observable features anchored in shared sensorimotor reality. I propose that a Minimal Grounding Set (MGS) can be recovered from the commonly used criteria for psychosis. This MGS, exemplified by disorganization and impoverishment, offers a privileged pathway for the neuroscientific inquiry of psychosis. In this case, (1) biological correlates will be most replicable for MGS than other symptoms; (2) MGS will serve as modular anchors in symptom networks; and (3) progress in precision medicine programmes like Computational Psychiatry and quantitative psychopathology frameworks such as hierarchical taxonomy (HiTOP) will depend on explicitly separating MGS from ungrounded symptoms. This approach of sign-first psychiatry will provide a non-circular foundation to tether abstract constructs affiliated with psychosis to biological realities that have eluded us for long.
Keywords: epistemology, Network Psychopathology, nosology, Phenomenology, Psychomotor signs, RDoC, Schizophrenia, thought disorder
Received: 29 Dec 2025; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Palaniyappan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lena Palaniyappan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.