ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Public Mental Health

Four Decades of ADHD: A Systematic AI-assisted Analysis of Conceptual Shifts Across Six DSM Editions

  • 1. Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

  • 2. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

  • 3. University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

  • 4. University College London, London, United Kingdom

Article metrics

View details

100

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Background: Considering the central role of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) in psychiatric classification, multiple studies have examined how it describes Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) – one of the most common psychiatric diagnoses. However, despite analyzing the same DSM texts, these studies yielded conflicting conclusions, likely influenced by the subjectivity of qualitative research and the challenge of systematically tracking subtle changes in large textual corpora. This study addresses these limitations by providing the first systematic, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis of all ADHD-related texts across six DSM editions (DSM-III to DSM-5-TR). Methods: The analysis employed two AI models (GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet) and followed five structured steps: (A) preliminary human review, (B) AI-assisted comparative analysis, (C) refinement through AI self-prompting to detect subtle linguistic changes, such as tone and diagnostic uncertainties, (D) thematic synthesis by each model, and (E) cross-model validation. Strict adherence to DSM texts ensured all findings were grounded in verifiable textual evidence. Results: The analysis identified six overarching trends: (1) a shift from a behavioral disorder to a neurodevelopmental framework, (2) expansion to a lifespan condition across genders, (3) a broadening concept of impairment, (4) increasing diagnostic flexibility, (5) an expanding scope of comorbidities and differential diagnoses, and (6) growing acknowledgment of cultural and contextual influences. Conclusions: The six overarching shifts alongside the detailed systematic analysis results (Supplementary Materials) provide a transparent and replicable reference point for how ADHD has been described and classified in the DSM over four decades. Additionally, the innovative methodology can improve reliability of future research into complex psychiatric discourse.

Summary

Keywords

ADHD, AI-assisted text analysis, DSM, Medicalization, psychiatric classification

Received

20 January 2026

Accepted

10 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Ophir, Shir-Raz and Tikochinski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yaakov Ophir

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics