Abstract
Quantum biology is a modern field of research that aims to understand how quantum effects can affect the chemistry underlying various biological processes. This paper reviews several examples of biological processes where quantum effects might play a notable role. Initially, the photon capture mechanism present in vision is discussed, where the energy of the photon is used to cause conformational changes to chromophoric proteins. The second example elaborates the highly efficient energy transfer process present in photosynthesis and discusses, in particular, how the random quantum walk process may enhance the performance drastically. Subsequently, the vertebrate magnetoreception, and the possible associated role of the radical pair mechanism in the process is considered. The review concludes with the discussion of some speculative ideas of putative quantum effects arising in neural processes.
1 Introduction
One of the first mentions of the idea of quantum biology can be traced back to the book “What is life?” (). Quantum biology studies the applications of quantum mechanics and theoretical chemistry to biological systems. The field of quantum biology aims to fundamentally understand how biological processes that rely on quantum effects work. With the development of computational chemistry techniques, the growth of quantum thermodynamics and approaches to study open quantum systems, it is possible to form a more fundamental understanding of the complex systems present in biology. In particular, this review is an introduction for anyone interested in understanding some of the possible ways how quantum mechanics may be relevant in several selected biological processes. Furthermore, a discussion of four biological processes – three well-established and a more speculative one – where quantum mechanisms possibly play a role is performed and guides the reader to a more detailed investigation on each subject. Although this review explores mainly quantum mechanical mechanisms, there are just as many proposals for classical or semiclassical descriptions of the processes discussed here (; ). We do not intend to discuss the existing controversies in detail and leave this discussion to more specialized reviews (; ; ) on the topics. Indeed we would like to briefly mention that quantum processes may need to be carefully addressed in the context of multiple biology processes.
Section 2 discusses the quantum effects in vision, by overviewing the photo-absorption process in related molecules. The semi-classical mechanism of light detection is discussed, explaining how vision functions. This mechanism involves a retinal molecule which, when excited by a photon, can undergo different energy decay paths depending on the photon’s energy and its molecular environment. Most organisms use similar mechanisms for photo-detection (). Vision requires a quantum or at least semi-classical description in which all or part of the system is described via the quantization of its states. However, the mechanism in vision does not require any degree of coherence or entanglement due to the superposition of the energetic states. On the other hand, there are examples of biological processes that might require a degree of coherence for efficient operation - as is the case with photosynthesis and vertebrate magnetoreception.
Section 3 illustrates how the efficiency of energy transfer in photosynthesis in bacteria may reach up to (), which can, in principle, be rationalized through the concept of quantum random walks. An explanation of the difference between a classical and a quantum walk is given, where it is demonstrated how it can become more efficient in transferring energy inside a protein, compared to the classical random walk analogue. The section then discusses more recent works that explore how the quantum walk is affected by coherence ().
Section 4 explores vertebrate magnetoreception, and discribes experimental evidence which suggests that migratory songbirds require light of specific wavelengths to utilize their magnetic compass (; ; ; ). Such behaviour could not be rationalized for a compass sense based on magnetic materials (; ; ). The section discusses a possible molecular mechanism for the Earth’s magnetic field detection, where correlated energy states in a receptor molecule play an essential role. This mechanism, called the radical pair mechanism, aims to explain how migratory songbirds can perceive the direction of the geomagnetic field without the use of magnetic minerals (). The radical pair mechanism is rooted upon the blue light-sensitive proteins present in the eyes of some bird species (; ; ).
As a last part of the review, a subject that has been gaining relevance in recent years is presented – the potential role of quantum mechanics in brain function, particularly concerning consciousness (; ; ). This section of the review provides a discussion of key theories, including the possible implications of quantum entanglement, coherence, and superposition in neural processes (; ; ; ; ; ). The challenges and controversies surrounding the raised hypothesis are addressed, along with future directions for research, highlighting recent advancements.
2 Vision
Vision is a common ability in complex living beings, defined as the ability to detect light and use it to interpret the environment (; ). A similar mechanism is used by bacteria to guide their locomotion towards or away from a light source; the basic mechanism is similar to photodetection in higher organisms, but does not function as a visual sensor. The basic molecular mechanism of vision relies on the protein rhodopsin (Rh) (; ), in the case of animals, or its variant bacteriorhrodopsin (bRh) (), in the case of bacteria. Central to rhodopsin’s structure is the chromophore retinal (Figure 1), which governs the quantum processes involved in photo-detection. A chromophore is a molecule embedded in the protein which has the function of absorbing light of a particular wavelength to start a cascade of chemical reactions ().Upon capturing a photon, retinal enters an electronically excited state and subsequently undergoes a twist in one of its chemical bonds causing the molecule to change into a new conformation (Figure 1B), the change in conformation is called cis to trans transformation (; ; ). This conformational change initiates a cascade of chemical reactions related to the visual cycle (; ), which signals the photo-detection.
FIGURE 1
The quantum aspect of vision is related to the changes of the energetic states of the molecule, and the mechanism of how those states define the function of the molecule. Only photons of specific wavelengths can be absorbed by the retinal, and those wavelengths are determined by the molecular quantized energy states at the moment of interaction between the retinal and the photon. In an idealized case, the retinal would only be able to absorb energy of one specific wavelength. Still, many different factors affect retinal’s energy spectrum, making it sensitive to a specific range of wavelengths, a phenomena called line broadening in spectroscopy (). Upon photo-absorption the molecule enters an electronically excited state, but eventually decays back to a ground state. One possibility for decaying into a less energetic state, is to use the energy received from the photon to cause conformational changes within the molecule, e.g., to exploit the transition from 11-cis-retinal to all-trans-retinal (). But there are other multiple possible ways the energy of the absorbed photon can be dissipated (Figure 2), impacting the efficiency of the photodetection mechanism.
FIGURE 2
The retinal molecule could revert to the original ground state by emitting a photon with a similar energy as the original one via spontaneous emission (); the process of dissipating energy through photon emission is called fluorescence. Alternatively the retinal molecule may undergo an adiabatic transition, when the molecule changes its state without radiating photons; the molecule transitions between different states while being on the same adiabatic energy surface (). As the molecule transitions between states, it can dissipate the excess energy to the environment in the form of vibrational modes (), transferring the energy to the chemical bonds and, eventually, dissipating the photon’s energy as vibrations throughout the protein. If the energy from the captured photon was not dissipated, and indeed caused a conformational change, then a series of chemical reaction follows ().
Despite decades of research, questions remain related to the critical understanding of the environmental influence around the retinal. The excitation properties of retinal depend on its molecular environment. Changing the environment also changes the sensitivity of retinal to specific wavelengths, e.g., a chromophore may become affected by red, green or blue light if put in different environments. It is not trivial to describe the effect of the environment onto the absorption spectra of molecules. The surrounding environment, in the case of vision, is complex (see Figure 1) and affects how the energy of the captured photon can be dissipated (Figure 2B). In theoretical calculations, one can include the environmental influence into the retinal by using i.e., polarizable embedding models, where a small region of the system is treated with quantum mechanical methods, and the environment is represented by multipoles and polarizabilities (; ; ; ). Solvatochromism (; ) (Figure 3) is one notable example of how the environment affects a molecule’s spectra. In this case the properties of the solvent affect the dye’s quantum excitations, which changes which photon wavelengths the dye absorbs. While photoabsorption is one of the most prominent examples for the requirement of a quantum mechanical description, there are a plethora of other processes which include quantum effects. For example, the energy transport of the absorbed light in rhodopsin in avian species was investigated previously, where it was illustrated that quantum effects are required for an efficient energy transportation (). The concept of quantum effect guided energy transportation is also a current research topic within the photosynthetic system of many species (; ; ) as will be described in the next section.
FIGURE 3
3 Photosynthesis
Photosynthesis is a well studied biological process () that permits plants and some bacteria to store energy harvested from photo-absorption. The complete process of photosynthesis is rather complex, so the focus here is set to the photosynthetic apparatus present in purple bacteria (Chlorobaculum Tepidum) which transports the energy from the antenna, a molecular structure dedicated to capturing light, to the reaction center, where the energy is used to synthesize glucose. The captured photon excites an electron in the antenna, making the electron leave its current energy site. The excitation of the electron forms a region with an absent negative charge, defined as a hole and can be assumed as a virtual particle with a positive charge. The electron-hole pair acts as a quasiparticle called exciton. The energy is transported as an exciton (; ; ; ) through the Fenma-Mattheus-Olson (FMO) protein complex (Figure 4) (; ; ) found in purple photosynthetic bacteria (; ; ). The FMO has embedded multiple Bactoriochlorophyll (BChl) molecules, the BChl serve as sites, where the exciton can diffuse from site to site from the antenna, near sites 1, 2, and 6, to the reaction center near site 3.
FIGURE 4
The energy transport has a high degree of efficiency in bacteria. About of the energy from absorbed photons reach the reaction center (). One suggestion for the high efficiency is the possibility that the exciton moves through the complex via quantum walk (; ; ). To better understand how the quantum walk might improve the efficiency one may explore the differences between classical and quantum stochastic walks.
Random walk is a widely known approach from statistical physics. For the sake of illustration consider a particle that experiences one dimensional (1D) random walk. The particle could, for example, symbolize an exciton that exists in the FMO, although the exciton’s real motion would be much more complex. Assume the particle to be initially placed at the origin. In the 1D random walk it experiences jumps in two possible directions (positive and negative). In the simplest scenario the particle may be displaced by one unit per jump. In the case of a classical random walk, after a finite number of jumps, the probability distribution of the particle’s positions approaches the normal distribution, as illustrated in Figure 5. The width of this distribution grows with the increase of the number of jumps. After a sufficiently large number of jumps, in the classical scenario, the probability of finding the particle at any point becomes similar. On contrary, if the number of jumps is finite, the classical particle has a tendency to localize around its starting position.
FIGURE 5
Quantum walk is a variation of the random walk where the movement of the particle is governed by quantum mechanics (). Instead of considering the specific particle, in quantum random walk one considers the particle’s wave-function. To represent the particle starting at the origin, its initial wave-function starts as a spike at the origin with the probability to be observed elsewhere being zero. With each jump the wave-function propagates freely, i.e., analogous to the classical “jump” introduced above. The quantum jump is usually represented by the propagation operator. As the number of jumps increases, the wave-function starts to interfere with itself, causing the probability of the particle being in previous positions to decrease. After a certain number of jumps an interference pattern emerges. The particle has a higher probability of being on the extremities of the 1D space, as opposed to the classical random walk where the particle has higher probability of being around the origin (). The higher probability of the particle being at the periphery of the diffusion limit is the reason why quantum walk is theorized as the source of the FMO’s high efficiency in energy transport (; ; ). If the exciton diffuses through a quantum walk, it tends to spread around the molecule, instead of remaining around the point of origin. Although the quantum walk illustrated here is a simplified example, studies which explore the quantum walk in photosynthesis use a more refined version of this model, where more transport possibilities are considered, and with the presence of different potentials which affect the wave-function’s dynamics (; ).
Figure 4 introduces a possible excitation pathway in the FMO. Following the numbering scheme in Figure 4, the energy is transferred from sites 1, 2 or 6, which are closer to the antenna, to site 3, which in turn is closer to the reaction center. The existence of quantum walk in the energy transfer is still under discussion (). The main argument in favor of quantum walk is that it might cause an enhancement in the energy transfer rate, since the particle localization probability experiencing a quantum walk tends to spread out more then in the classical random walk. Some works also suggest environment assisted mechanisms for the quantum walk, where environmental noise could aid transport transfer pathways (; ; ). However, other studies point out that the energy transfer rate increase within the quantum random walk is not guaranteed (; ). These studies suggest that the energy transfer is optimized for efficiency instead of speed. Other quantum effects, such as entanglement (; ; ; ) or Grover’s quantum search (), are theorized to be the source of the high efficiency (). An argument against quantum effects is the short decoherence time at room temperature, which would greatly limit the lifetime of emerging quantum states. presents a counter example to the quantum walk hypothesis, where the authors use trajectory-based simulations to show that a description in terms of quantum electrons and classical nuclei is sufficient to describe the efficiency of the FMO’s energy transfer.
4 Vertebrate magnetoreception
The phenomenon of magnetoreception is observed in various organisms, including bacteria, insects, amphibians, birds, sharks, fish and rays, which use it to orient themselves to the Earth’s magnetic field (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). Behavioral experiments with European migratory songbirds suggest the presence of a mechanism that would allow the animals to use the geomagnetic field for navigation or orientation (; ). The experiments are conducted during the migratory season when the birds are most active and have an impulse to migrate (; ; ). In the experiments, the birds are placed inside an Emlen funnel (). The funnel has scratch paper inside; as the birds jump and peck, they mark the direction in which they intend to go; it has been observed that the distribution of the scratch marks on the paper changes depending on the controlled illumination of the environment. When the experiment was performed under less energetic colors of light, like red, the direction of the scratches was random, but with more energetic colors, like blue, the scratches were more localized in a specific direction (). Since the birds had no other form of orientation or navigation available during the experiment, the conclusion was that they might be using some mechanism to detect the geomagnetic field. This mechanism should be light-dependent, accounting for the different behaviour during light conditions. Similar experiments have shown that birds have an inclination compass (; ). Inclination compasses work in a slightly different way than the ordinary compasses. Standard compasses are polarity compasses, they point to one of the poles of the magnetic field. Inclination compasses do not point to the poles; they give information on the inclination of the field lines of a given magnetic field. If the polarity of the field is flipped, but the inclination is the same, then the inclination compass will not change its direction ().
Following the experimental evidence that the birds use an inclination compass, the animal would not be able to detect magnetic fields solely by employing magnetic materials, since the related mechanisms would naturally imply a polarity compass (). Another magnetoreception mechanism proposed by is the so-called radical pair mechanism. Here, a radical pair is formed by a light-activated chemical reaction and works as an inclination compass, providing information about the inclination of the magnetic field and a molecular structure in which the radical pair is embedded. It is theorized to exist inside a protein called cryptochrome in the bird’s retina (; ; ; ). Cryptochrome has a chromophore called flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), which is sensitive to blue light (; ; ; ). Cryptochrome also contains several conserved tryptophan (Trp) residues that bridge the FAD cofactor with the protein surface. Figure 6 shows the structure of a cryptochrome from an european robin (erithacus Rubecula) (; ) with the embedded FAD and the key Trps. The proposed radical pair mechanism utilizes these molecules to detect the geomagnetic field as illustrated in Figure 7.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
The reaction cascade starts with the FAD absorbing a photon of an appropriate energy. The photon excites an electron in the FAD to a higher energy state and allows the excited FAD to receive another electron from the Trp residue nearby (; ; ; ; ). After the electron transfer, the FAD and Trp have unpaired electrons, i.e., form a radical pair. The transferred electron was originally paired with another electron with a similar energy, therefore, both electrons in the radical pair initially form a singlet spin state, where the spins of the electrons appear anti-parallel, and the spins of the electrons are correlated. Each unpaired electron of the radical pair is located at a different site; therefore, the electrons experience different magnetic environments, which include the interactions between the electron spins and the nuclear spins, called hyperfine interactions, and the interaction between the electron spins and the external magnetic field, called the Zeeman interaction (; ; ). The radical pair is sensitive to weak magnetic fields, such as the geomagnetic field of about T, as magnetic interactions may affect the electron’s precession rate. The different precession rates cause the radical pair to change its spin state between singlet (anti-parallel spins) and triplet (parallel spins) states, a process called interconversion (see Figure 7), and occurs with a certain rate. Figure 8 illustrates that the frequency of singlet to triplet transition may be modulated by the relative angle between the spins and the external magnetic field. Therefore, a correlation between the inclination of the magnetic field and the amount of time the electrons remain in either singlet or triplet state can be established. The radical pair state is unstable, and after a few microseconds the molecules are expected to recombine into chemical products ( and in Figure 7), but which product they recombine into depends on the spin state of the electrons (; ; ). Some reactions are spin-selective and are only possible if the electrons are in the singlet state, i.e., the recombination of the radical pair. Since the inclination of the field modulated the interconversion rates between the radical pairs states, it also affects the probability of the reactions producing a certain product. The ratio of products in a radical pair reaction could thus be sensitive to the inclination of the magnetic field, and therefore the radical pair mechanism could be used to explain the inclination compass of migratory birds.
FIGURE 8
A relevant discussion on the radical pair mechanism is whether it requires a quantum description. There are multiple descriptions for the dynamics of the radical pair mechanism (; ; ), both purely quantum and semi-classical. The primary quantum aspect of radical pairs is the correlation of spin states. Spin is a quantized property only able to assume specific discrete values, and cannot be described by a purely classical approach. The quantized nature of spin defines the description of the radical pair as either semi-classical or purely quantum. While the radical pair mechanism is a promising hypothesis for the underlying phenomenon of magnetoreception, the concept of coherence challenges the theory. Due to the thermal motion of the molecular structure of proteins in which the radical pair is embedded, constant perturbations through adjacent magnetic momenta of the nuclear spins are leading to rapid decoherence of the radical pair emerging in spin relaxation (; ; ; ). It was demonstrated in several studies that these decoherence processes drastically decrease the efficiency of the magnetic radical pair compass (; ; ). Emerging new theories address the spin relaxation problem. For example, Smith et al. showed that complex time-dependencies of inter-radical pair magnetic interactions might drastically increase magnetic sensitivity (). Non-Markovian approaches were also suggested to explore the impact of thermal motion in spin relaxation (; ; ; ; ; ; ). Another theory is the involvement of a third scavenger radical participating in the radical pair mechanism proposed by Kattnig and co-workers (; ). This new hypothesis still requires the consideration of the quantum mechanical nature of spin, which sets the topic of magnetoreception as one of the major research areas of quantum biology.
5 Quantum effects in neural processes
The hypothesis that quantum mechanics may play a role in brain function, especially in the context of consciousness, has recently sparked considerable interest and debate (; ; ). Quantum mechanics, which governs the behaviour of physical systems at the smallest scales, may offer insights into the complex phenomena observed in the brain. This section briefly overviews the current research on quantum effects in the brain, focusing on some of the key findings and theories and presents the major challenges and controversies involved.
One of the most prominent theories on quantum effects in the brain is the “quantum consciousness” hypothesis proposed by Hameroff and Penrose (). Although the unfortunate naming might attract unexpected ideas, the quantum consciousness theory posits that quantum processes such as entanglement, coherence, and superposition might have a role in brain function. Consciousness here does not relate to any metaphysical ideal, but to the brain’s ability to process and to react to external or internal stimuli and how anesthetics affect it, e.g., a rat following the smell of food, or a reaction to pain. While quantum consciousness is highly controversial, it is physically possible that quantum phenomena might be involved in critical points in neural processes. For instance, anesthetic gases can selectively block consciousness while sparing non-conscious brain activities, i.e., make someone unconscious (; ; ). Notably, it has been shown that, in mice, xenon isotopes with nuclear spin 1/2 are significantly less potent as anesthetics compared to isotopes with spin 0, suggesting a potential link between nuclear spin and consciousness (; ; ; ). The lesser effect of spin 1/2 isotopes supports the idea that consciousness might involve quantum processes, possibly through mechanisms like nuclear spin interactions and electron spin dipole oscillations in proteins present in neurons ().
Quantum effects might be particularly relevant in addressing the “binding problem” in cognitive neuroscience—the question of how the brain integrates disparate sensory information into a unified conscious experience (; ; ). In visual processing, for example, information about the shape, color, motion, and meaning of an object is processed in different areas of the visual cortex at different times (). These disparate elements are then correlated to bring forward a coherent perceptual experience. Quantum entanglement, where particles remain connected over distance and time, could provide a mechanism for this integration ().
In another direction, microtubules, cytoskeletal components within neurons, have been speculated as potential sites for quantum computing in the brain. Microtubules are theorized to exhibit quantum resonance oscillations and might host quantum processes that regulate neuronal activity and behavior (). Anesthetic gases are believed to dampen these oscillations, correlating with their ability to induce unconsciousness ().
While the many ideas of quantum effects playing possible roles in brain functioning may be interesting, there are essential problematics drastically damping the hypotheses. For quantum effects be involved in any neural process, the decoherence time for quantum states in a biological environment is critical. Decoherence times in thermal equilibrium can be estimated as Equation 1where is the Planck’s constant, is the Boltzmann constant, and is the environment temperature (). At body temperature ( K), is of the order of seconds, which is too rapid for any quantum effect to have any significant impact (). Under certain conditions, such as the hydrophobic environments within proteins, coherence times might be prolonged, making quantum effects more feasible (; ), however, experimental evidence for such scenarios remains elusive and challenging. Furthermore, the energy required to maintain coherent quantum states can be compared to thermal energy , as Equation 2where is the frequency of quantum oscillations (). For quantum effects to be significant, must be comparable to or greater than . In microtubules, oscillation frequencies in the teraHertz range have been observed, suggesting that may be significant relative to (; ). However, the measurements of teraHertz frequencies were not measured in vivo, but in “cell-like” environments.
In a recent article (), explore the surprising light-harvesting properties of microtubules. Their experimental investigation demonstrates that microtubules can facilitate long-range electronic energy migration. Using tryptophan autofluorescence lifetimes, the study shows that energy can diffuse over distances of 6.6 nm within microtubules, a length significantly longer than predicted by conventional Förster theory, . The study also highlights that this energy migration is sensitive to the polymerization state of tubulin and can be dampened by anesthetics like etomidate and isoflurane. These findings suggest that microtubules may have unique biophysical properties that could be relevant in both biological processes and the development of biohybrid devices, opening new avenues for exploring the non-classical roles of microtubules beyond their well-known functions in cellular architecture and transport, and possibly influencing future research in quantum biology and neurobiology.
To advance our understanding of potential quantum effects in the brain, interdisciplinary research combining neuroscience, quantum physics, and computational biology is essential. Future studies should focus on identifying specific quantum processes in neurons and developing experimental techniques to observe these processes in vivo. Additionally, exploring how quantum mechanics might contribute to other cognitive functions could provide valuable insights into the nature of consciousness (; ; ).
Following this line, a recent study demonstrates the possibility of generating entangled biphotons in the myelin sheath using cavity quantum electrodynamics (cQED) (). This study demonstrates that the vibrational modes of C-H bonds within lipid molecules’ tails can generate a significant number of entangled photon pairs.
The abundance of C-H bond vibration units in neurons can, therefore, serve as a source of quantum entanglement resources for the nervous system, thereby elucidating a potential source for the synchronized activity of neurons (; ; ). By demonstrating the feasibility of entangled biphoton generation in the brain’s myelin sheath, Liu et al. opens up new avenues for exploring how quantum entanglement could contribute to higher-order cognitive functions, such as decision-making, problem-solving, and consciousness ().
Despite the intriguing hypotheses mentioned before, the idea of quantum processes in the brain remains largely speculative and controversial. One major challenge is the issue of decoherence. Quantum states are susceptible to environmental disturbances, and the “warm, wet, and noisy” environment of the brain is expected to cause rapid decoherence, disrupting the possible quantum effects (). However, certain conditions, such as the hydrophobic environments within proteins, might be more conducive to maintaining quantum coherence (). Moreover, some researchers argue that the brain’s complexity and functionality can be explained without invoking quantum mechanics. They point out that many proposed quantum brain processes remain speculative and lack direct experimental evidence (; ; ; ). argued that the warm temperature of the brain would cause quantum coherence to break down too rapid to have any functional role. Despite this, proponents of quantum consciousness theories suggest that certain brain structures, such as microtubules, could protect against decoherence through as-yet-unknown mechanisms (; ).
Additionally, the feasibility of quantum computing within neurons is questioned. Critics highlight the lack of empirical data supporting the quantum brain hypothesis and emphasize the success of classical computational models in explaining brain functions (; ). The authors also argue that many cognitive phenomena can be adequately explained without invoking quantum processes, pointing to advances in neuroscience and computational modeling that provide a detailed understanding of brain mechanisms using classical physics (; ). Nevertheless, recent experimental and theoretical developments continue to keep the debate alive, such as the peculiar effects of anesthetics on consciousness (; ), suggest that quantum effects could play a role in brain function, even if the exact mechanisms remain elusive.
6 Conclusion
Quantum biology is an emerging interdisciplinary field that elucidates how quantum effects can influence biological processes. This review discusses some examples that demonstrate the potential impact of quantum mechanics on biological systems, ranging from vision and photosynthesis to magnetoreception and neural processes. Starting the discussion with more well known processes and moving towards more elusive and speculative ones.
In vision, the quantum photo-absorption mechanism in retinal underscores the necessity of quantum descriptions for understanding light detection and subsequent chemical reactions. The discussed energy dynamics in the retinal after photo-absorption also illustrates how many effects, both classical and quantum, have to be taken into account when describing a biological process.
Section 3 illustrates the role of the quasi-particle exciton in a molecular mechanism, and how energy can be transported during a biological process. The efficiency of photosynthetic energy transfer through the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex highlights the potential role of quantum random walks in biological systems. But there is still much to be studied on the precise description of the photosynthesic energy transfer mechanism, and what impact quantum random walk could have on it.
Magnetoreception in migratory songbirds, possibly mediated by the radical pair mechanism in the cryptochrome protein, illustrates how quantum effects can influence animal behavior and navigation. Avian magnetoreception is one of the more elusive examples in this review. Although there is extensive research on the subject (; ; ; ), it still needs rigorous experimental and theoretical investigation for the complete mechanism to be well understood.
The final section, discusses possible quantum effects present in neuronal activities. Specifically the activities connected with an animal’s active behaviour, or consciousness. As mentioned in the section, “consciousness” here refers to the term when used in anesthetic research. The ability for the animal to process and react to sensory data, or an awareness of internal and external stimuli. This review presents experimental results that show how isotopes with different spin can cause different effects on neuronal activities in mice (), and discussed the impact of low decoherence times on the presence of quantum effects in neurons.
Overall, this review emphasizes the importance of continued interdisciplinary research in quantum biology. As experimental techniques advance and theoretical models become more refined, the understanding of quantum effects in biological systems will likely deepen, offering novel insights into the fundamental mechanisms of life.
Statements
Author contributions
PA: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. LG: Writing–review and editing. IS: Supervision, Writing–review and editing. MO: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors would like to declare funding from the Volkswagen Foundation (Lichtenberg professorship awarded to I.A.S.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1372 Magnetoreception and Navigation in Vertebrates, no. 395940726 to I.A.S.; TRR386/1-2023 HYP∗MOL, no 514664767 to I.A.S.), and the Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony Simulations Meet Experiments on the Nanoscale: Opening up the Quantum World to Artificial Intelligence (SMART) and Dynamik auf der Nanoskala: Von koharenten Elementarprozessen zur Funktionalitaet (DyNano). PA is partially supported the Pioneer Science Initiative (Iniciativa Ciência Pioneira) and the D’Or Institute of Research & Education. MO is partially supported by CNPq.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Correction note
A correction has been made to this article. Details can be found at: 10.3389/frqst.2026.1804272.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BabcockN. S.KattnigD. R. (2021). Radical scavenging could answer the challenge posed by electron–electron dipolar interactions in the cryptochrome compass model. JACS Au1 (11), 2033–2046. 10.1021/jacsau.1c00332
2
BabcockN. S.Montes-CabreraG.OberhoferK. E.CherguiM.CelardoG. L.KurianP. (2024). Ultraviolet superradiance from mega-networks of tryptophan in biological architectures. J. Phys. Chem. B128 (17), 4035–4046. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07936
3
BlankenshipR. E.TiedeD. M.BarberJ.BrudvigG. W.FlemingG.GhirardiM.et al (2011). Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science332 (6031), 805–809. 10.1126/science.1200165
4
BoulyJ.-P.SchleicherE.Dionisio-SeseM.VandenbusscheF.Van Der StraetenD.BakrimN.et al (2007). Cryptochrome blue light photoreceptors are activated through interconversion of flavin redox states. J. Biol. Chem.282 (13), 9383–9391. 10.1074/jbc.m609842200
5
BoyerM. M.PoulsenG. L.NorkT. M. (2000). Relative contributions of the neurosensory retina and retinal pigment epithelium to macular hypofluorescence. Archives Ophthalmol.118 (1), 27–31. 10.1001/archopht.118.1.27
6
BreuerH.-P.LaineE.-M.PiiloJ. (2009). Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401. 10.1103/physrevlett.103.210401
7
BreuerH.-P.LaineE.-M.PiiloJ.VacchiniB. (2016). Colloquium: non-markovian dynamics in open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021002. 10.1103/revmodphys.88.021002
8
BreuerH.-P.PetruccioneF. (2007). The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9
BullierJ. (2001). Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res. Rev.36 (2), 96–107. The Brain in Health and Disease - from Molecules to Man. Swiss National Foundation Symposium NRP 38. 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00085-6
10
CadiouH.McNaughtonP. A. (2010). Avian magnetite-based magnetoreception: a physiologist’s perspective. J. R. Soc. Interface7, S193–S205. 10.1098/rsif.2009.0423.focus
11
CaoJ.CogdellR. J.CokerD. F.DuanH.-G.HauerJ.KleinekathöferU.et al (2020). Quantum biology revisited. Sci. Adv.6 (14), eaaz4888. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4888
12
CarrilloA.CornelioM. F.de OliveiraM. C. (2015). Environment-induced anisotropy and sensitivity of the radical pair mechanism in the avian compass. Phys. Rev. E92, 012720. 10.1103/physreve.92.012720
13
CarusoF.ChinA. W.DattaA.HuelgaS. F.PlenioM. B. (2009). Highly efficient energy excitation transfer in light-harvesting complexes: the fundamental role of noise-assisted transport. J. Chem. Phys.131 (10), 105106. 10.1063/1.3223548
14
CashmoreA. R.JarilloJ. A.WuY.-J.LiuD. (1999). Cryptochromes: blue light receptors for plants and animals. Science284 (5415), 760–765. 10.1126/science.284.5415.760
15
CintolesiF.RitzT.KayC.TimmelC.HoreP. (2003). Anisotropic recombination of an immobilized photoinduced radical pair in a 50-μt magnetic field: a model avian photomagnetoreceptor. Chem. Phys.294 (3), 385–399. 10.1016/s0301-0104(03)00320-3
16
ClarH.PatelR. (2023). Anesthetic Gases — ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537013/ (Accessed August 18, 2024).
17
CraddockT. J.KurianP.PretoJ.SahuK.HameroffS. R.KlobukowskiM.et al (2017). Anesthetic alterations of collective terahertz oscillations in tubulin correlate with clinical potency: implications for anesthetic action and post-operative cognitive dysfunction. Sci. Rep.7, 9877. 10.1038/s41598-017-09992-7
18
CukrasJ.SadlejJ. (2021). Towards quantum-chemical modeling of the activity of anesthetic compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (17), 9272. 10.3390/ijms22179272
19
DeviersJ.CailliezF.de la LandeA.KattnigD. R. (2024). Avian cryptochrome 4 binds superoxide. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.26, 11–21. 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.009
20
DeviersJ.CailliezF.GutiérrezB. Z.KattnigD. R.de la LandeA. (2022). Ab initio derivation of flavin hyperfine interactions for the protein magnetosensor cryptochrome. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.24 (27), 16784–16798. 10.1039/d1cp05804e
21
Di PrimaD.ReinholdtP.KongstedJ. (2024). Color tuning in bovine rhodopsin through polarizable embedding. J. Phys. Chem. B128 (12), 2864–2873. PMID: 38489248. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07891
22
DodsonC. A.HoreP.WallaceM. I. (2013). A radical sense of direction: signalling and mechanism in cryptochrome magnetoreception. Trends Biochem. Sci.38 (9), 435–446. 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.07.002
23
DudheN.SahooP. K.BenjaminC. (2022). Testing quantum speedups in exciton transport through a photosynthetic complex using quantum stochastic walks. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.24, 2601–2613. 10.1039/d1cp02727a
24
EgerE. I.RainesD. E.ShaferS. L.HemmingsH. C.SonnerJ. M. (2008). Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?Anesth. and Analgesia107 (3), 832–848. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318182aedb
25
EmlenS. T.EmlenJ. T. (1966). A technique for recording migratory orientation of captive birds. Auk83 (3), 361–367. 10.2307/4083048
26
EngelG. S.CalhounT. R.ReadE. L.AhnT.-K.MančalT.ChengY.-C.et al (2007). Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature446 (7137), 782–786. 10.1038/nature05678
27
EngelsS.HeinC. M.LefeldtN.PriorH.MouritsenH. (2012). Night-migratory songbirds possess a magnetic compass in both eyes. PLoS ONE7 (9), e43271. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043271
28
FassioliF.Olaya-CastroA. (2010). Distribution of entanglement in light-harvesting complexes and their quantum efficiency. New J. Phys.12 (8), 085006. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/085006
29
FayT. P.LindoyL. P.ManolopoulosD. E.HoreP. J. (2020). How quantum is radical pair magnetoreception?Faraday Discuss.221, 77–91. 10.1039/c9fd00049f
30
FeldmanJ. (2012). The neural binding problem(s). Cogn. Neurodynamics7 (1), 1–11. 10.1007/s11571-012-9219-8
31
FennaR. E.MatthewsB. W. (1975). Chlorophyll arrangement in a bacteriochlorophyll protein from chlorobium limicola. Nature258 (5536), 573–577. 10.1038/258573a0
32
FisherM. P. A. (2015). Quantum cognition: the possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain. Ann. Phys.362, 593–602. 10.1016/j.aop.2015.08.020
33
ForsterT. (1946). Energiewanderung und fluoreszenz. Naturwissenschaften33, 166–175. 10.1007/bf00585226
34
FoxM. (2010). Excitons. 2 edition. London, England: Oxford University Press, 95–110. chapter 4.
35
FrederiksenA.AldagM.Solov’yovI. A.GerhardsL. (2024a). Activation of cryptochrome 4 from atlantic herring. Biology13 (4), 262. 10.3390/biology13040262
36
FrederiksenA.GerhardsL.ReinholdtP.KongstedJ.Solov’yovI. A. (2024b). Importance of polarizable embedding for absorption spectrum calculations of arabidopsis thaliana cryptochrome 1. J. Phys. Chem. B0 (0), 6283–6290. PMID: 38913544. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c02168
37
FreemanW. J. (2003). Evidence from human scalp electroencephalograms of global chaotic itinerancy. Chaos13 (3), 1067–1077. 10.1063/1.1596553
38
FroehlichH. (1968). Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems. Int. J. Quantum Chem.2, 641–649. 10.1002/qua.560020505
39
GerhardsL.NielsenC.KattnigD. R.HoreP.Solov’yovI. A. (2023). Modeling spin relaxation in complex radical systems using MolSpin. J. Comput. Chem.44, 1704–1714. 10.1002/jcc.27120
40
GhasemiF.ShafieeA. (2020). An investigation into the energy transfer efficiency of a two-pigment photosynthetic system using a macroscopic quantum model. Biosystems197, 104209. 10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104209
41
GrüningG.GerhardsL.WongS. Y.KattnigD.Solov’yovI. (2024). The effect of spin relaxation on magnetic compass sensitivity in ercry4a. Chemphyschem a Eur. J. Chem. Phys. Phys. Chem.25, e202400129. e202400129–e202400129. 10.1002/cphc.202400129
42
GrüningG.WongS. Y.GerhardsL.SchuhmannF.KattnigD. R.HoreP.et al (2022). Effects of dynamical degrees of freedom on magnetic compass sensitivity: a comparison of plant and avian cryptochromes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144 (50), 22902–22914. 10.1021/jacs.2c06233
43
HaasT.KrauseR.WeberR.DemlerM.SchmidG. (2018). Technical photosynthesis involving co2 electrolysis and fermentation. Nat. Catal.1 (1), 32–39. 10.1038/s41929-017-0005-1
44
HaganS.HameroffS. R.TuszynskiJ. A. (2002). Quantum computation in brain microtubules? decoherence and biological feasibility. Phys. Rev. E65 (6), 061901. 10.1103/physreve.65.061901
45
HakenH.WolfH. C. (1996). General laws of optical transitions. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 281–296. chapter 16.
46
HameroffS. (2022). Consciousness, cognition and the neuronal cytoskeleton – a new paradigm needed in neuroscience. Front. Mol. Neurosci.15, 869935. 10.3389/fnmol.2022.869935
47
HameroffS. R. (1998). Quantum computation in brain microtubules? the penrose-hameroff ’orch or’ model of consciousness. Philosophical Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.356 (1743), 1869–1896. 10.1098/rsta.1998.0254
48
HameroffS. R. (2018). Anesthetic action and ’quantum consciousness’: a match made in olive oil. Anesthesiology129 (2), 228–231. 10.1097/aln.0000000000002273
49
HameroffS. R.PenroseR. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: a review of the ’orch or’ theory. Phys. Life Rev.11 (1), 39–78. 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002
50
HanićM.SchuhmannF.FrederiksenA.LangebrakeC.MantheyG.LiedvogelM.et al (2022). Computational reconstruction and analysis of structural models of avian cryptochrome 4. J. Phys. Chem. B126 (25), 4623–4635. PMID: 35704801. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00878
51
HoreP. J.MouritsenH. (2016). The radical-pair mechanism of magnetoreception. Annu. Rev. Biophysics45 (1), 299–344. PMID: 27216936. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-032116-094545
52
HoyerS.SarovarM.Birgitta WhaleyK. (2010). Limits of quantum speedup in photosynthetic light harvesting. New J. Phys.12 (6), 065041. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/065041
53
ImahashiM.WatanabeM.JhaS.HayashiK. (2014). Olfaction-inspired sensing using a sensor system with molecular recognition and optimal classification ability for comprehensive detection of gases. Sensors14 (3), 5221–5238. 10.3390/s140305221
54
IshizakiA.FlemingG. R. (2010). Quantum superpositions in photosynthetic light harvesting: delocalization and entanglement. New J. Phys.12 (5), 055004. 10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/055004
55
JedlickaP. (2017). Revisiting the quantum brain hypothesis: toward quantum (neuro)biology?Front. Mol. Neurosci.10, 366. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00366
56
JolyJ. (1921). A quantum theory of colour vision. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, Contain. Pap. a Biol. Character92 (646), 219–232. 10.1098/rspb.1921.0020
57
JonesJ.HoreP. (2010). Spin-selective reactions of radical pairs act as quantum measurements. Chem. Phys. Lett.488 (1), 90–93. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.01.063
58
KalraA. P.BennyA.TravisS. M.ZizziE. A.Morales-SanchezA.OblinskyD. G.et al (2023a). Electronic energy migration in microtubules. ACS Central Sci.9 (3), 352–361. 10.1021/acscentsci.2c01114
59
KarafyllidisI. G. (2017). Quantum transport in the fmo photosynthetic light-harvesting complex. J. Biol. Phys.43, 239–245. 10.1007/s10867-017-9449-4
60
KattnigD. R.Solov’yovI. A.HoreP. (2016a). Electron spin relaxation in cryptochrome-based magnetoreception. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18 (18), 12443–12456. 10.1039/c5cp06731f
61
KattnigD. R.SowaJ. K.Solov’yovI. A.HoreP. (2016b). Electron spin relaxation can enhance the performance of a cryptochrome-based magnetic compass sensor. New J. Phys.18 (6), 063007. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/063007
62
KhoranaH. G. (1992). Rhodopsin, photoreceptor of the rod cell. an emerging pattern for structure and function. J. Biol. Chem.267 (1), 1–4. 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)48444-x
63
KochC. (2016). How to build a conscious machine. Sci. Am.317 (5), 28. 10.1038/scientificamerican1117-28
64
KretschmerK.FrederiksenA.ReinholdtP.KongstedJ.Solov’yovI. A. (2024). Understanding the red shift in the absorption spectrum of the fad cofactor in clcry4 protein. J. Phys. Chem. B128 (22), 5320–5326. PMID: 38805723. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c00710
65
LandauL. D.LifshitzE. M. (1981). Quantum mechanics. 3 edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
66
LaurienM.MendeL.LuhrmannL.FrederiksenA.AldagM.SpieckerL.et al (2024). Magnetic orientation in juvenile atlantic herring (clupea harengus) could involve cryptochrome 4 as a potential magnetoreceptor. J. R. Soc. Interface21 (215), 20240035. 10.1098/rsif.2024.0035
67
LiN.LuD.YangL.TaoH.XuY.WangC.et al (2018). Nuclear spin attenuates the anesthetic potency of xenon isotopes in mice: implications for the mechanisms of anesthesia and consciousness. Anesthesiology129 (2), 271–277. 10.1097/aln.0000000000002226
68
LiZ. Y.ShenH. Z. (2024). Non-markovian dynamics with a giant atom coupled to a semi-infinite photonic waveguide. Phys. Rev. A109, 023712. 10.1103/physreva.109.023712
69
LiedvogelM.MaedaK.HenbestK.SchleicherE.SimonT.TimmelC. R.et al (2007). Chemical magnetoreception: bird cryptochrome 1a is excited by blue light and forms long-lived radical-pairs. PLoS ONE2 (10), e1106. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001106
70
LiuZ.ChenY.-C.AoP. (2024). Entangled biphoton generation in the myelin sheath. Phys. Rev. E110, 024402. 10.1103/physreve.110.024402
71
LoulakisM.BlatsiosG.VrettouC.KominisI. (2017). Quantum biometrics with retinal photon counting. Phys. Rev. Appl.8 (4), 044012. 10.1103/physrevapplied.8.044012
72
MaedaK.HenbestK. B.CintolesiF.KuprovI.RodgersC. T.LiddellP. A.et al (2008). Chemical compass model of avian magnetoreception. Nature453 (7193), 387–390. 10.1038/nature06834
73
MaedaK.RobinsonA. J.HenbestK. B.HogbenH. J.BiskupT.AhmadM.et al (2012). Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.109 (13), 4774–4779. 10.1073/pnas.1118959109
74
MaraisA.AdamsB.RingsmuthA. K.FerrettiM.GruberJ. M.HendrikxR.et al (2018). The future of quantum biology. J. R. Soc. Interface15 (148), 20180640. 10.1098/rsif.2018.0640
75
MariniA.Muñoz-LosaA.BiancardiA.MennucciB. (2010). What is solvatochromism?J. Phys. Chem. B114 (51), 17128–17135. PMID: 21128657. 10.1021/jp1097487
76
MatysikJ.GerhardsL.TheissT.TimmermannL.Kurle-TucholskiP.MusabirovaG.et al (2023). Spin dynamics of flavoproteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24 (9), 8218. 10.3390/ijms24098218
77
McFaddenJ.Al-KhaliliJ. (2018). The origins of quantum biology. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.474 (2220), 20180674. 10.1098/rspa.2018.0674
78
McKemmishL. K.ReimersJ. R.McKenzieR. H.MarkA. E.HushN. S. (2009). Quantum chemistry: simulation of the geometry and vibrational spectra of biomolecules relevant to the orch or model. Phys. Rev. E80 (1), 021912. 10.1103/physreve.80.021912
79
MennucciB.CammiR.TomasiJ. (1998). Excited states and solvatochromic shifts within a nonequilibrium solvation approach: a new formulation of the integral equation formalism method at the self-consistent field, configuration interaction, and multiconfiguration self-consistent field level. J. Chem. Phys.109 (7), 2798–2807. 10.1063/1.476878
80
MillerS. L. (1961). A theory of gaseous anesthetics*</sup>. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.47 (9), 1515–1524. 10.1073/pnas.47.9.1515
81
MoazedK. T. (2023). “Quantum retina,” in Quantum biology of the eye: understanding the essentials (Germany: Springer), 67–86.
82
MohseniM.RebentrostP.LloydS.Aspuru-GuzikA. (2008). Environment-assisted quantum walks in photosynthetic energy transfer. J. Chem. Phys.129 (17), 174106. 10.1063/1.3002335
83
MohseniO. E.PlenioH. (2014). Quantum effects in biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84
MoraC. V.DavisonM.WildJ. M.WalkerM. M. (2004). Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon. Nature432 (7016), 508–511. 10.1038/nature03077
85
MouritsenH. (2015). “Chapter 8 - magnetoreception in birds and its use for long-distance migration,” in Sturkie’s avian physiology. sixth edition edition (San Diego: Academic Press), 113–133.
86
MouritsenH. (2018). Long-distance navigation and magnetoreception in migratory animals. Nature558 (7708), 50–59. 10.1038/s41586-018-0176-1
87
MouritsenH.HoreP. (2012). The magnetic retina: light-dependent and trigeminal magnetoreception in migratory birds. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.22 (2), 343–352. Neuroethology. 10.1016/j.conb.2012.01.005
88
MouritsenH.Janssen-BienholdU.LiedvogelM.FeendersG.StalleickenJ.DirksP.et al (2004). Cryptochromes and neuronal-activity markers colocalize in the retina of migratory birds during magnetic orientation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.101 (39), 14294–14299. 10.1073/pnas.0405968101
89
National Center for Biotechnology Information (2024a). PubChem compound summary for CID 5280490, 11-cis-Retinal. Available at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/11-cis-Retinal (Accessed June 3, 2024).
90
National Center for Biotechnology Information (2024b). PubChem compound summary for CID 638015, retinal. Available at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Retinal (Accessed May 26, 2024).
91
NsofiniJ. (2012). Discrete quantum walk on a line with two entangled particles.
92
Olaya-CastroA.LeeC. F.OlsenF. F.JohnsonN. F. (2008). Efficiency of energy transfer in a light-harvesting system under quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. B78, 085115. 10.1103/physrevb.78.085115
93
OsterbyB. R.McKelveyR. D. (1996). Convergent synthesis of betaine-30, a solvatochromic dye: an advanced undergraduate project and demonstration. J. Chem. Educ.73 (3), 260. 10.1021/ed073p260
94
PedramA.MüstecaplıoğluÖ. E.KominisI. K. (2022). Using quantum states of light to probe the retinal network. Phys. Rev. Res.4 (3), 033060. 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033060
95
PlenioM. B.HuelgaS. F. (2008). Dephasing-assisted transport: quantum networks and biomolecules. New J. Phys.10 (11), 113019. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/11/113019
96
ReimersJ. R.McKemmishL. K.McKenzieR. H.MarkA. E.HushN. S. (2009). Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not biologically feasible. Phys. Rev. E80 (2), 021912. 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021912
97
RitzT.HuX.DamjanovićA.SchultenK. (1998). Excitons and excitation transfer in the photosynthetic unit of purple bacteria. J. Luminescence76-77, 310–321. 10.1016/s0022-2313(97)00286-x
98
RitzT.ParkS.SchultenK. (2001). Kinetics of excitation migration and trapping in the photosynthetic unit of purple bacteria. J. Phys. Chem. B105 (34), 8259–8267. 10.1021/jp011032r
99
RodgersC. T.HoreP. J. (2009). Chemical magnetoreception in birds: the radical pair mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.106 (2), 353–360. 10.1073/pnas.0711968106
100
RoyantA.NollertP.EdmanK.NeutzeR.LandauE. M.Pebay-PeyroulaE.et al (2001). X-ray structure of sensory rhodopsin II at 2.1-Å resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.98 (18), 10131–10136. 10.1073/pnas.181203898
101
RüdigerW. (1986). The chromophore. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 17–33. chapter 2.
102
RunesonJ. E.LawrenceJ. E.MannouchJ. R.RichardsonJ. O. (2022). Explaining the efficiency of photosynthesis: quantum uncertainty or classical vibrations?J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13 (15), 3392–3399. PMID: 35404611. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00538
103
SahuS.GhoshS. K.FujitaD.BandyopadhyayA. (2014). Live visualizations of single isolated tubulin protein self-assembly via tunneling current: effect of electromagnetic pumping during spontaneous growth of microtubule. Sci. Rep.4, 7303. 10.1038/srep07303
104
SarovarM.IshizakiA.FlemingG. R.WhaleyK. B. (2010). Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes. Nat. Phys.6 (6), 462–467. 10.1038/nphys1652
105
SchlosshauerM. (2007). Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Germany: Springer.
106
SchrödingerE. (1944). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Based on lectures delivered under the auspices of the Institute at trinity college, Dublin, in february 1943. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
107
SchrödingerE.PenroseR. (2012). What is life? with Mind and Matter and autobiographical sketches. Canto classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108
SchroedingerE. (1944). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109
SchuhmannF.RyvkinL.McLarenJ. D.GerhardsL.Solov’yovI. A. (2023). Across atoms to crossing continents: application of similarity measures to biological location data. Plos one18 (5), e0284736. 10.1371/journal.pone.0284736
110
SchultenK.HayashiS. (2014). Quantum biology of retinal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–263. chapter 11.
111
SchultenK.SwenbergC. E.WellerA. (1978). A biomagnetic sensory mechanism based on magnetic field modulated coherent electron spin motion. Z. für Phys. Chem.111 (1), 1–5. 10.1524/zpch.1978.111.1.001
112
SenS.KarR. K.BorinV. A.SchapiroI. (2022). Insight into the isomerization mechanism of retinal proteins from hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci.12 (1), e1562. 10.1002/wcms.1562
113
ShenH. Z.XuS.LiH.WuS. L.YiX. X. (2018). Linear response theory for periodically driven systems with non-markovian effects. Opt. Lett.43 (12), 2852–2855. 10.1364/ol.43.002852
114
SingerW. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations?Neuron24 (1), 49–65. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1
115
SmithJ.Zadeh HaghighiH.SalahubD.SimonC. (2021). Radical pairs may play a role in xenon-induced general anesthesia. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 6287. 10.1038/s41598-021-85673-w
116
SmithL. D.ChowdhuryF. T.PeasgoodI.DawkinsN.KattnigD. R. (2022). Driven radical motion enhances cryptochrome magnetoreception: toward live quantum sensing. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13 (45), 10500–10506. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02840
117
Solov’yovA. V.VerkhovtsevA. V.MasonN. J.AmosR. A.BaldI.BaldacchinoG.et al (2024). Condensed matter systems exposed to radiation: multiscale theory, simulations, and experiment. Chem. Rev.124, 8014–8129. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00902
118
Solov’yovI. A.ChandlerD. E.SchultenK. (2008). Exploring the possibilities for radical pair effects in cryptochrome. Plant Signal. and Behav.3 (9), 676–677. 10.4161/psb.3.9.5809
119
Solov’yovI. A.GreinerW. (2008). Iron-mineral-based magnetoreceptor in birds: polarity or inclination compass?Eur. Phys. J. D51 (1), 161–172. 10.1140/epjd/e2008-00118-y
120
Solov’yovI. A.GreinerW. (2009). Micromagnetic insight into a magnetoreceptor in birds: existence of magnetic field amplifiers in the beak. Phys. Rev. E80, 041919. 10.1103/physreve.80.041919
121
Solov’yovI. A.RitzT.SchultenK.HoreP. J. (2014). A chemical compass for bird navigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–236. chapter 10.
122
SpudichJ. L.JungK.-H. (2005). Microbial rhodopsins: phylogenetic and functional diversity. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 1–23. chapter 1.
123
StarrC.EversC.StarrL. (2006). Biology: concepts and applications. Brooks/cole biology series. Pacific Grove: Thomson, Brooks/Cole.
124
SteinmannC.ReinholdtP.NørbyM. S.KongstedJ.OlsenJ. M. H. (2019). Response properties of embedded molecules through the polarizable embedding model. Int. J. Quantum Chem.119 (1), e25717. 10.1002/qua.25717
125
TangH.ShangX.-W.ShiZ.-Y.HeT.-S.FengZ.WangT.-Y.et al (2024). Simulating photosynthetic energy transport on a photonic network. npj Quantum Inf.10 (1), 29. 10.1038/s41534-024-00824-x
126
TegmarkM. (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Phys. Rev. E61 (4), 4194–4206. 10.1103/physreve.61.4194
127
TimmerD.FrederiksenA.LünemannD. C.ThomasA. R.XuJ.BartölkeR.et al (2023). Tracking the electron transfer cascade in european robin cryptochrome 4 mutants. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145 (21), 11566–11578. 10.1021/jacs.3c00442
128
TronrudD. E.WenJ.GayL.BlankenshipR. E. (2009). The structural basis for the difference in absorbance spectra for the fmo antenna protein from various green sulfur bacteria. Photosynth. Res.100 (2), 79–87. 10.1007/s11120-009-9430-6
129
TruhlarD. G. (2003). “Potential energy surfaces,” in Encyclopedia of physical science and technology Editor MeyersR. A.Third Edition (New York: Academic Press), 9–17.
130
VacchiniB.BreuerH.-P. (2010). Exact master equations for the non-markovian decay of a qubit. Phys. Rev. A81, 042103. 10.1103/physreva.81.042103
131
ValeurB.Berberan-SantosM. N. (2011). A brief history of fluorescence and phosphorescence before the emergence of quantum theory. J. Chem. Educ.88 (6), 731–738. 10.1021/ed100182h
132
VarelaF. J.LachauxJ.-P.RodriguezE.MartinerieJ. (2001). The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.2, 229–239. 10.1038/35067550
133
WaldG. (1968). The molecular basis of visual excitation. Nature219 (5156), 800–807. 10.1038/219800a0
134
WhaleyK. B.SarovarM.IshizakiA. (2011). Quantum entanglement phenomena in photosynthetic light harvesting complexes. Procedia Chem.3 (1), 152–164. 22nd Solvay Conference on Chemistry. 10.1016/j.proche.2011.08.021
135
WiltschkoR. (2012). Magnetic orientation in animals, Vol. 33. Germany: Springer Science and Business Media.
136
WiltschkoR.SchiffnerI.FuhrmannP.WiltschkoW. (2010). The role of the magnetite-based receptors in the beak in pigeon homing. Curr. Biol.20 (17), 1534–1538. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.073
137
WiltschkoR.WiltschkoW. (2012). The magnetite-based receptors in the beak of birds and their role in avian navigation. J. Comp. Physiology A199 (2), 89–98. 10.1007/s00359-012-0769-3
138
WiltschkoW.WiltschkoR. (1972). Magnetic compass of european robins. Science176 (4030), 62–64. 10.1126/science.176.4030.62
139
WongS. Y.WeiY.MouritsenH.Solov’yovI. A.HoreP. J. (2021). Cryptochrome magnetoreception: four tryptophans could be better than three. J. R. Soc. Interface18 (184), 20210601. 10.1098/rsif.2021.0601
140
WorsterS.KattnigD. R.HoreP. (2016). Spin relaxation of radicals in cryptochrome and its role in avian magnetoreception. J. Chem. Phys.145 (3), 035104. 10.1063/1.4958624
141
XinL.XuS.YiX. X.ShenH. Z. (2022). Tunable non-markovian dynamics with a three-level atom mediated by the classical laser in a semi-infinite photonic waveguide. Phys. Rev. A105, 053706. 10.1103/physreva.105.053706
142
XuJ.JarochaL. E.ZollitschT.KonowalczykM.HenbestK. B.RichertS.et al (2021). Magnetic sensitivity of cryptochrome 4 from a migratory songbird. Nature594 (7864), 535–540. 10.1038/s41586-021-03618-9
143
ZhuX.-G.LongS. P.OrtD. R. (2010). Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu. Rev. plant Biol.61 (1), 235–261. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206
144
ZuevaL.GolubevaT.KorneevaE.RestoO.InyushinM.KhmelinskiiI.et al (2019). Quantum mechanism of light energy propagation through an avian retina. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.197, 111543. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111543
Summary
Keywords
quantum biology, spin dynamics, molecular chemistry, magnetoreception, quantum mechanics
Citation
Alvarez PH, Gerhards L, Solov’yov IA and de Oliveira MC (2024) Quantum phenomena in biological systems. Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3:1466906. doi: 10.3389/frqst.2024.1466906
Received
18 July 2024
Accepted
30 September 2024
Published
30 October 2024
Corrected
06 March 2026
Volume
3 - 2024
Edited by
Margit Christine Egg, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Reviewed by
Taras Plakhotnik, The University of Queensland, Australia
H. Z. Shen, Northeast Normal University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Alvarez, Gerhards, Solov’yov and de Oliveira.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pedro H. Alvarez, pedro.alvarez@uni-oldenburg.de
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.