You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Rehabil. Sci.

Sec. Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Conditions

Physiological Changes of Cortisol and Oxytocin Following Manual Therapy: A Scoping Review

  • 1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States

  • 2. College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia

  • 3. Libraries, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States

Article metrics

View details

3

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Neuroendocrine responses to manual therapy (MT), including changes in cortisol and oxytocin, have long been proposed as potential physiological mechanisms of MT-related effects. Over the past three decades, a growing body of literature has examined hormonal/neuropeptide responses following MT; however, findings remain heterogeneous and unevenly distributed across outcomes and MT intervention types. The objective of this scoping review was to map and characterize the existing evidence for changes in cortisol (CORT) and/or oxytocin (OXT) levels in response to three commonly used MT interventions and to identify patterns and gaps within the literature. Methods: Five databases (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies included those which were (a) in English, (b) in humans, (c) original data studies, (d) included a form of MT (massage, osteopathic manipulative treatment, spinal manipulation, etc.), and (e) at least one physiological measure (e.g., saliva, urine, plasma) of CORT and/or OXT. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using a structured approach consistent with scoping review methodology. Results: The literature search identified 2374 studies, with 72 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. Studies varied widely in MT intervention type, population characteristics, sample size, rigor, biological sampling methods, and timing of outcome assessment. Most of the included studies measured cortisol outcomes, whereas fewer investigated oxytocin. Both reported hormonal/neuropeptide responses as mixed across MT intervention approaches. Conclusions: CORT and OXT responses to MT were variable across studies, reflecting heterogeneity in intervention delivery, sample size, timing of hormone/neuropeptide collection, and analytical methods. This review underscores the need to standardize how MT-related neuroendocrine outcomes are collected, address the many gaps in the evidence particularly as it relates to OXT, and to clarify the potential mechanistic role of CORT and OXT in MT-related clinical outcomes. Trian registration: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/a78tu), registration date: July 15,

Summary

Keywords

cortisol, manual therapy, Massage, Oxytocin, Scoping review, spinal manipulation, SpinalMobilization

Received

06 October 2025

Accepted

16 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Cao, Alanazi, Billings and Reed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: William R Reed

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics