SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Rehabil. Sci.
Sec. Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Conditions
Physiological Changes of Cortisol and Oxytocin Following Manual Therapy: A Scoping Review
Andy Cao 1
Murdi S. Alanazi 1,2
Rebecca Billings 3
William R Reed 1
1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
2. College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia
3. Libraries, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Neuroendocrine responses to manual therapy (MT), including changes in cortisol and oxytocin, have long been proposed as potential physiological mechanisms of MT-related effects. Over the past three decades, a growing body of literature has examined hormonal/neuropeptide responses following MT; however, findings remain heterogeneous and unevenly distributed across outcomes and MT intervention types. The objective of this scoping review was to map and characterize the existing evidence for changes in cortisol (CORT) and/or oxytocin (OXT) levels in response to three commonly used MT interventions and to identify patterns and gaps within the literature. Methods: Five databases (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies included those which were (a) in English, (b) in humans, (c) original data studies, (d) included a form of MT (massage, osteopathic manipulative treatment, spinal manipulation, etc.), and (e) at least one physiological measure (e.g., saliva, urine, plasma) of CORT and/or OXT. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data using a structured approach consistent with scoping review methodology. Results: The literature search identified 2374 studies, with 72 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. Studies varied widely in MT intervention type, population characteristics, sample size, rigor, biological sampling methods, and timing of outcome assessment. Most of the included studies measured cortisol outcomes, whereas fewer investigated oxytocin. Both reported hormonal/neuropeptide responses as mixed across MT intervention approaches. Conclusions: CORT and OXT responses to MT were variable across studies, reflecting heterogeneity in intervention delivery, sample size, timing of hormone/neuropeptide collection, and analytical methods. This review underscores the need to standardize how MT-related neuroendocrine outcomes are collected, address the many gaps in the evidence particularly as it relates to OXT, and to clarify the potential mechanistic role of CORT and OXT in MT-related clinical outcomes. Trian registration: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/a78tu), registration date: July 15,
Summary
Keywords
cortisol, manual therapy, Massage, Oxytocin, Scoping review, spinal manipulation, SpinalMobilization
Received
06 October 2025
Accepted
16 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Cao, Alanazi, Billings and Reed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: William R Reed
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.