ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Rehabil. Sci.

Sec. Rehabilitation in Neurological Conditions

Body-Weight Supported Treadmill or Total Body Recumbent Stepper for Mobility-Adapted Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Varying Disability

  • Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada

Article metrics

View details

74

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Background: Accurate exercise prescription in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) depends on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Obtaining an accurate VO2max can be challenging when patients experience lower limb impairment and fatigue that can change over time. Objective: We sought the optimal adapted device to achieve a maximal CPET among persons with MS. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial with within-subject, repeated measures design, clinic-referred persons with MS (n=10) with three-month stability, no exercise obstruction, ability to walk with or without assistance, and sex-and age-matched (±3 years) Controls (n=7) were recruited by convenience sampling. Participants performed CPET on body weight-supported treadmill (BWST) and total body recumbent stepper (TBRS). We collected standard aerobic metrics, including V̇ O2max, % normative values for V̇ O2max (%V̇ O2max), heart rate maximum (HRmax), age-predicted HRmax, and Respiratory Exchange Ratio. Results: MS patients, regardless of disability severity, achieved similar V̇ O2max values (mL×min-1×kg-1) on the TBRS and BWST. Control participants obtained higher values on BWST (40.27±7.6 vs. 34.32±7.1, p<0.001). MS patients more consistently met the criteria for maximal CPET using the TBRS (n=9/10 vs. 6/10 on BWST). Conclusions: V̇ O2max was similar between devices among MS patients. On BWST, they achieved lower V̇ O2max values compared to Controls. MS patients more successfully achieved the primary criterion, VO2 plateau (≤150 ml/min-1), using TBRS. Additionally, TBRS permitted persons with mobility disability to achieve more criteria for a maximum CPET. Our results suggest that CPET using BWST, being reliant on the lower body, likely disadvantages MS patients, especially those with mobility disability.

Summary

Keywords

aerobic capacity, Cardiopulmonary exercise test, cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, Disability, fitness, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscle Fatigue

Received

23 October 2025

Accepted

12 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Hadjizadeh Anvar, Kelly, Newell, Alcock, Barzegarpoor and Ploughman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Michelle Ploughman

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics