Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Robot. AI

Sec. Computational Intelligence in Robotics

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1512099

This article is part of the Research TopicTheory of Mind in Robots and Intelligent SystemsView all 6 articles

A Relevance Model of Human Sparse Communication in Cooperation

Provisionally accepted
Kaiwen  JiangKaiwen Jiang1*Boxuan  JiangBoxuan Jiang2Anahita  SadaghdarAnahita Sadaghdar2Rebekah  LimbRebekah Limb2Tao  GaoTao Gao2*
  • 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
  • 2University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Human real-time communication creates a limitation on the flow of information, which requires the transfer of carefully chosen and condensed data in various situations. We introduce a model that explains how humans choose information for communication by utilizing the concept of "relevance" derived from decision-making theory and Theory of Mind (ToM). We evaluated the model by conducting experiments where human participants and an artificial intelligence (AI) agent assist each other to avoid multiple traps in a simulated navigation task. The relevance model accurately depicts how humans choose which trap to communicate. It also outperforms GPT-4, which participates in the same task by responding to prompts that describe the game settings and rules. Furthermore, we demonstrated that when humans received assisting information from an AI agent, they achieved a much higher performance and gave higher ratings to the AI when it utilized the relevance model compared to a heuristic model. Together, these findings provide compelling evidence that a relevance model rooted in decision theory and ToM can effectively capture the sparse and spontaneous nature of human communication.

Keywords: relevance, Decision Theory, Theory of Mind, POMDP, Large Language Model, artificial intelligence

Received: 16 Oct 2024; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Jiang, Sadaghdar, Limb and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Kaiwen Jiang, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 48824, Michigan, United States
Tao Gao, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 90095, California, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.