METHODS article
Front. Robot. AI
Sec. Human-Robot Interaction
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1594529
This article is part of the Research TopicFamily-Centered Design: Enhancing Child-Technology Engagement Through Family PerspectivesView all 5 articles
Pathways to Family-Centered Healthcare: Co-Designing AI Solutions with Families in Pediatric Rehabilitation
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Developmental Neuroscience, Stella Maris Scientific Institute, University of Pisa, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
- 2Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
- 3Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
- 4Fightthestroke Foundation, Milan, Italy
- 5FTS srl, Milan, Italy
- 6Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Medication Area and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Despite the growing interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for pediatric rehabilitation, family engagement in the technologies design remains limited. Understanding how AI-driven tools align with family needs, caregiving routines, and ethical concerns is crucial for their successful adoption. In this study, we actively involved nine families of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) in an online participatory design workshop, underscoring both the feasibility and the need of integrating family's perspectives into AI development. Families enthusiastically participated, not only sharing insights but also appreciating the opportunity to contribute to shaping future technologies. Their active engagement challenges the assumption that co-design with families is complex or impractical, highlighting how structured yet flexible methodologies can make such crucial initiatives highly effective. The online format further facilitated participation, allowing families to join the discussion and ensuring a diverse range of perspectives. The workshop's key findings reveal three core priorities for families: (1) AI should adapt to daily caregiving routines rather than impose rigid structures; (2) digital tools should enhance communication and collaboration between families and clinicians, rather than replace human interaction; and (3) AI-driven systems could empower children's autonomy while maintaining parental oversight. Additionally, families raised critical concerns about data privacy, transparency, and the need to preserve empathy in AI-mediated care. Our findings reinforce the urgent need to shift toward family-centered AI design, moving beyond purely technological solutions toward ethically responsible, inclusive innovations. This research not only demonstrates the possibility and success of engaging families in co-design processes but also provides a model for future AI development that genuinely reflects the lived experiences of children and caregivers.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, Pediatric Rehabilitation, family-centered design, Cerebral Palsy, Participatory Design, healthcaretechnology, Ethical AI, Stakeholder perspectives
Received: 16 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Filogna, Arras, Turchi, Prencipe, Beani, Bombonato, Fedeli, D'Alessandro, Scrocco and Sgandurra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Silvia Filogna, silvia.filogna@fsm.unipi.it
Tommaso Turchi, research@tommasoturchi.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.