ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sociol.

Sec. Work, Employment and Organizations

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1434353

Exploring stroke survivor and employer experiences of disruption within the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial during the COVID-19 pandemic

Provisionally accepted
Diane  TrussonDiane Trusson1Katie  PowersKatie Powers1Kate  RadfordKate Radford1*Audrey  BowenAudrey Bowen2Kristelle  CravenKristelle Craven1Amanda  FarrinAmanda Farrin3Christopher  McKevittChristopher McKevitt4John  MurrayJohn Murray5Julie  PhillipsJulie Phillips1Judith  StevensJudith Stevens5David  ClarkeDavid Clarke3
  • 1University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • 2The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, United Kingdom
  • 3University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom
  • 4King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 5PPI, Leeds, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Returning to work is a goal for many stroke survivors, with benefits for individuals and society. The ReTurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial, which aimed to improve stroke survivors’ work outcomes through early stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation (ESSVR), was ongoing during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to understand the impact of the pandemic on stroke survivors’ work ability and return-to work support. Nine stroke survivors and five employers were interviewed. Thematic analysis informed by Normalisation Process Theory, found that biographical disruption experienced as a result of stroke was compounded by disruption on a global scale due to the pandemic. Attempts to mobilise resources in response to disruption were hampered by pandemic-related issues. Although returning to work offered continuity in pre-stroke identity, businesses were also disrupted by the pandemic. Findings suggest that returning to work was easier for stroke survivors able to work from home and those receiving ESSVR. The opportunity to work from home helped stroke survivors adapt to new ways of working necessitated by the impact of stroke and social distancing rules during the pandemic. Post-pandemic, remote working is more acceptable, which may benefit future stroke survivors aiming to return to work whilst managing post-stroke fatigue. This may mitigate disruption to lives and post-stroke identities.

Keywords: Stroke, Return-to-work, biographical disruption, Normalisation process theory (NPT), vocational rehabilitation, COVID-19 pandemic, interviews, United Kingdom

Received: 17 May 2024; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Trusson, Powers, Radford, Bowen, Craven, Farrin, McKevitt, Murray, Phillips, Stevens and Clarke. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Kate Radford, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.