ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sociol.

Sec. Sociology of Stratification

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1568400

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring Social Stratification Dynamics: Insights from Longitudinal Survey DataView all 6 articles

Privileges among the Privileged

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • 2University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The effect of starting conditions at age 16 on occupational success from age 16 to 66 in an educationally privileged group.Educational selection separates more successful students from the less successful ones. The positively selected students should be better than the ones left behind, but they should also be more homogeneous. Among the ones privileged by educational selection the mean of achievement, of school grades and test intelligence, should be higher than in the student population at large, and the standard deviation lower. Equally, social resources which have partly determined achievement should also be higher in the privileged than in the student population at large. But this does not mean that achievement and social origin no longer filter the student population. They continue to differentiate careers. They may again privilege the already privileged by creating "cumulative advantages" (DiPrete and Eirich, 2006, p. 286;Schafer et al., 2011 Schafer et al., , pp. 1056-7)-7). "Existing social inequalities are deepened further because it is already privileged social groups that profit most from atypical paths to higher secondary education" (Buchholz et al., 2016, p. 90). And they have consequence for the occupational career and the inequality of societies at large (Triventi et al., 2016, pp. 4-6, 12-13).

Keywords: occupational prestige and income, age effects, life course age 16 to 66, Panel analysis, High school students, Germany 1969-2020

Received: 29 Jan 2025; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Birkelbach, Duelmer and Meulemann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Klaus Birkelbach, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.