REVIEW article
Front. Sustain.
Sec. Resilience
The Formal-Informal Institutional and Policy Nexus in Livelihood Diversification among Smallholder Farmers in Developing Countries: A systematic Review
Provisionally accepted
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Mpumalanga, Mbombela, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Livelihood diversification is widely recognized as a strategy for improving income stability, resilience, and food security among smallholder farmers in developing countries. However, evidence on how institutional environments shape diversification outcomes remains fragmented, particularly regarding interactions between formal and informal institutions. This study applies the Sustainable Livelihood Framework to examine how these institutional spheres influence livelihood diversification across developing-country contexts. A systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and institutional reports from Africa, Asia, and Latin America was conducted. The review synthesized evidence on the roles of formal institutions, including extension services, financial systems, policies, cooperatives, and market infrastructure, alongside informal institutions such as kinship networks, reciprocity systems, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, community savings groups, and Self-Help Groups. Findings show that both institutional spheres significantly influence diversification decisions, with stronger outcomes where complementarities exist. Formal institutions shape access to markets, finance, technology, and information, while informal institutions provide social capital, flexibility, and risk-sharing mechanisms. However, weak coordination, policy misalignment, and exclusionary implementation processes often constrain diversification and produce uneven outcomes. The study concludes that sustainable livelihood diversification depends on cohesive institutional environments that recognize and integrate both systems. Key outcomes include improved income, food security, resilience, and capital accumulation. Recommendations include strengthening institutional coordination, improving extension and financial access, investing in rural infrastructure, aligning policies with local norms, and reinforcing governance within informal institutions to support inclusive livelihood diversification.
Keywords: Development5, formal and informal institutions, Livelihood Diversification, Livelihood Diversification1, policy2, Rural Development, Smallholder farmers, smallholder farmers3
Received: 29 Dec 2025; Accepted: 05 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 SITHOLE. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: MOSES Zakhele SITHOLE
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.